/baw/ - General Discussion

Board was updated, if you get any errors, please mention it in the feedback thread.

Board stats: 41811 posts, 231 threads

Posting a new thread on /baw/
Options
No.418510
Picture Unrelated threadAnonymous
Image:155858483653.png(477kB, 424x565)1220309799436.png
We need some fucking content here. Post an image here you don't know where else to post.
No.419894
Anonymous
This thread is actually in autosage, huh. No hurry on starting another one while images can still be posted, at least until it falls off the first page.
No.419899
Anonymous
Image:158496868121.png(1.14MB, 1215x726)russian co.png
That reminds me of that time I visited Russian /co/. Wish I'd remember which site it was on, though.
No.419964
Anonymous
Image:158564261894.jpg(595kB, 907x6700)344525.jpg
goddamn animu weight lifters
No.417543
Black Hand ## Developer
Image:152917417300.png(3kB, 116x116)plus4chan.png
After half year, the board software has finally been updated.

Please use this thread for bug reports, questions, and suggestions.
No.419718
Anonymous
Replies:>>419719
Image:158242569010.png(4kB, 320x200)demo.png
>>419717
Will do, sorry about that.
No.419719
Anonymous
Replies:>>419721
>>419718
Please also test it with javascript on. A lot of effort was put into a more usable quick reply, and I'm dreading that it'll have some bugs that will end up breaking the site.

also what c64 demo is that pic from?
No.419721
Anonymous
>>419719
JavaScript on? Ok.

No idea where it's from, just searched images for demoscene (source is avatar of https://twitter.com/demoscene)
No.419520
moose ## Admin
Image:157801694054.png(46kB, 422x513)ripmoose.png

With the turn of the decade comes a turn of ownership: As of today, Black Hand is officially the owner/operator of plus4chan. I have the utmost confidence in them, Black Hand has done more for this site in the two years they've been involved than I did in the prior three from when I took over+time prior to that when I was just a mod.

And I did let the site languish (including an attempted murder), so I don't deserve any outgoing speech. Instead, I want to offer thanks:
- Thanks to the mods who have continued to check in from time to time and help keep things in order
- Thanks to Anonex for creating p4c, and for putting up with my shit when I took ownership
- Thanks to Black Hand for the blood and sweat poured into the site, and saving this place from death

...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.419668
Anonymous
Image:158110447383.jpg(14kB, 325x307)16k95pi.jpg
Late to the (funeral)party, but here's my 2 cents anyway.

Thanks for /coc/. Without that, we'd probably never have gotten as far with the Melusine translation project as we did before the translator unfortunately vanished.
Have a good life.
No.419674
Anonymous
Replies:>>419729
Thank you anyway. Stupid question: are you animoose?
No.419729
Anonymous
>>419674
No, he is anonymoose. A completely different moose.
No.419682
Anonymous
Image:158141871043.jpg(10kB, 262x254)aj5fgnc35ha41.jpg
Hi all. I was wondering if it's possible to delete a thread from the archive? It has a bunch of old art I'm kinda ashamed to have up somewhere and would much rather it was just all gone haha
No.419684
Anonymous
The archives have no database whatsoever, so deleting anything from it would end up throwing a bunch of errors unless all the html files are manually edited out.

And on general principle I wouldn't want to revise the past.
No.419685
Anonymous
That's fair. Ah well, I figured I'd ask
No.419686
Anonymous
Technically it COULD be edited out, but the archives are also checked by the wayback machine and google, and updating them will just flag them as a newer page, and then they would get ranked higher / get archived again, which is kinda not what you want. Getting re-crawled means people can compare the old and new content and see that your thread got removed.
Oh and you'd need to tell us what you want edited out in the first place, and then people would know that they should check your old art.

tbh we get so low traffic that you really don't have to worry about it. The archives mostly get linked to in offsite comments made 10 years ago. I don't think anyone will find them unless they specifically search for "{artist name} plus4chan archive".
No.392806
Eating
File deleted
Yet another crazy ideas thread.

Would it be that controversial if museums and airlines introduced free, mandatory gags to put over your babies mouth when they start crying? Or even a bloody plastic bag?
No.419398
Anonymous
Replies:>>419399
>>419397
It is arguable because PS1 does hardware dithering to fake a higher colour count and has such a low resolution that CRT screens make it look better. The screen is way sharper because the CRT can match the resolution of the game, while a flat panel would do some basic bilinear stretching with variable amount of ringing noise to make it run on its native resolution.
PS2 doesn't run in high resolution or in widescreen (except for very few select titles), and many games actually use 480i, so it would look better on a decent CRT too. Except for the games that actually do progressive output, which is not that common.

PS3 and above, games with digital output, will of course look the best on digital panels.
No.419399
Mister Twister
Replies:>>419400
>>419398
You were wise to use the key word, "arguable". Because if you have a good deinterlacer (either built-in or something like a Framemeister), you can make 480i and 576i look good on a flat panel. And, arguably 240/288p of PS1 games does not look better on a CRT, since it introduces black scanlines.
No.419400
Anonymous
>>419399
The problem isn't the deinterlacing but that the low-res polygon graphics look really really blurry when stretched out to a HD panel. A good scaler helps, but those have their own downsides: Framemeister is extremely expensive and EOL, and has huge problems when a game switches resolutions mid-game, while the OSSC is good for 240p and switches resolutions fast but it is absolutely trash for interlaced games (it makes them look WORSE).

the Crt scanlines and shadow mask / aperture grille layouts do end up making the graphics much sharper, since each pixel is more defined, as opposed to a blurry soup on a hd panel.
No.409833
Anonymous
Replies:>>409835
Image:147476447400.png(15kB, 300x300)1226302880236.png
THE ARCHIVES ARE STILL DEAD!

BRING THEM BACK!

BRING BACK THE PLUS4CHAN ARCHIVES!
No.409835
Anonymous
Replies:>>411626
>>409833
HA HA. GOOD LUCK.

I saved the threads I cared about. did you?
No.411626
Mister Twister
>>409835
>saving threads
It's the content you need to save.
No.419334
Anonymous
Just in case you haven't seen them:
https://boards.plus4chan.org/archives.php
No.419191
Help save RMS and Free SoftwareAnonymous
Image:157274987780.jpg(1.16MB, 2048x1536)1570473185738.jpg

Help RMS defeat the tranny faggot sjws destroying Free Software. Learn the truth of what is happening and spread these links everywhere.

https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/
https://medium.com/@whoisylvia/richard-stallman-has-been-vilified-by-those-who-dont-know-him-a3907b25b4c7
https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2019-09/msg00259.html

...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.419215
Anonymous
Replies:>>419216
>>419214
I'm surprised it hasn't been removed yet, seems like a bot post.
No.419216
Anonymous
>>419214
>>419215
I was AFK, it's gone now.
No.419228
Anonymous
>people complain about windows 10 privacy
>that update deletes your personal documents so hackers cant get them
I call that progress
No.419006
Anonymous
Image:156980462949.png(6kB, 768x768)Facebook logo.png
The Plus4chan Facebook group was just archived
No.419011
Anonymous
I quit facebook years ago. Fucking good riddance.
No.419012
Anonymous
Image:156984936206.png(5kB, 500x96)Archived.png
>>419008
You can find the group if you search Plus4chan on Facebook
No.419013
Anonymous
It was probably something that was done automatically due to lack of use. Do we even know who created it?
No.415307
Alpharius
Image:149981646100.png(1.08MB, 736x725)Summer 2017.png
Speak Your Mind: S U M M M E R edition

Please remember to brush and floss your teeth.

Old thread here ==> >>411618
No.418821
Mistir Twistir
>>418820
8chan is necessary, despite its ugliness.
No.418992
Anonymous
Replies:>>418993
Why are so many movie stars cultists?

I mean, scientology is a collection of them, but even Gwyneth Paltrow has her own snake-oil company that also has its own culty scam seminars
No.418993
Anonymous
>>418992
Because stardom makes their lives hell. They can't do as much as go down to the groceries without people flocking over them. Cults are a place where that doesn't matter, and it gives them a sense of belonging too, so when the join they feel a level of appretiation they do not feel elsewhere.

It is one place where they can go to and meet people without stardom being a problem.

That, or they are just scammers who know that people go to cults for that reason, and they try to take advantage of that.
No.418851
Anonymous
Image:156586484905.png(127kB, 280x280)my badge of honor.png
AHEM...
Hello hello… I come in peace.
No.418858
Anonymous
HOLA, SENOR!
No.418861
Janny
Replies:>>418863
Just keep politics in the politics thread and we'll all have a good time.
No.418863
Anonymous
>>418861
The last politics thread is not bumping anymore so might as well use this as the new one?

No.418453
Anonymous
Image:155627880480.gif(34kB, 220x220)tenor.gif
So I recently discovered this site. First of all I appreciate that this place is fully functional without JS. I would like to know if the board software is available. I would love to use it in my site. How does this site control spam though?
No.418462
Anonymous
Replies:>>418465
>>418457
I definitely think those are fair points, I just think in most cases JS should be a bonus enhancer rather then a requirement. On some sites that can't be done, but forums and imageboards rarely have a need to require JS just to load and post (captcha being the biggest exception I can think of)
No.418465
Black Hand ## Developer
>>418462
On a fundamental level, an imageboard (or any social network site for that matter) does not need it, yes, and I do make it a point to get every site I work on done with bare minimum javascript. But on a practical level, the site needs it really badly, to make things simpler and faster for the users. People don't sit in front of the monitor pressing F5 F5 F5 when waiting for replies; they expect their phone to ping to notify them of a new reply. That's just how it is now.

Regardless of that, I want the new design to retain every function of the current one, there must be no regressions. And that means there's still some work left to be done.
No.418675
Black Hand ## Developer
>>418456
>I'm happy to test on demo whenever needed.
I've updated it with an alpha/preview for you to check.
No.418404
Anonymous
Replies:>>418410
Image:155442441895.gif(1.29MB, 195x229)1552369713766.gif
https://boards.plus4chan.org/b/
No.418406
Anonymous
Replies:>>418407
For what purpose?
No.418407
Master Twaster
>>418406
To try and see if it works.
No.418410
Anonymous
>>418404
I noticed yesterday. Time to post.
No.415045
Screencap Thread: plus4chan editionAnonymous
Image:149758133600.png(41kB, 720x1032)They Might Be comrades.png
Previous thread: >>409421
No.418315
Anonymous
Image:155266841807.png(111kB, 1127x681)1446583146509.png
No.418317
Anonymous
Replies:>>418318
Thread is autosaging, so 400 is the limit?
No.418318
Black Hand ## Developer
>>418317
It's 400 on /baw/, 500 on /coc/, should be 300 everywhere else.
No.418157
Anonymous
Image:154698155168.png(259kB, 512x512)ET Contact Tool app.png
ZIN-URU

Poderoso Mantra de Toth Zim Uruyoutube thumb
No.418169
Anonymous
Video:154707458721.webm(1.15MB / 0:00:52 / vp8, 640x480)ohhmmmmmmmmm.webm
I see your ZINURU and raise with OHHMMMMMMMMM.
No.418170
User 9
Replies:>>418217
>>418168
Occasionally being mistaken for spam is just the price of looking enigmatic.
No.418217
Anonymous
>>418170
I can sympathize with that
No.417696
Anonymous
Image:153403009600.png(90kB, 962x1490)5dc6ki6j8jf11.png

Tumblr raw images are no longer accessible. You're now stuck with shitty 1280px downscales.

https://www.reddit.com/r/userscripts/comments/9605e8/
https://www.reddit.com/r/tumblrhelp/comments/961vqf/

complain to:

...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.418055
Anonymous
>>418054

As much as I am happy about tumblr tanking, what alternative is there for NSFW art?
- deviantart only allows nudity, not porno
- pixiv requires censoring (for at least the title pic), they have no RSS feeds
- twitter compresses the shit out of all image files, uses random unidentifiable filenames, and most people flood it with reposts - it's not a gallery/blog, is what I'm saying.
- newsgrounds allows porno but not loli. no RSS

...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.418056
Anonymous
Image:154390757300.jpg(72kB, 535x796)tumblr suicide.jpg
I'm dyin' from laughter here.
No.418057
Anonymous
EVERYTHINGS COMING UP NEWGROUNDS!