/baw/ - General Discussion

Please consider donating! Thanks!

Board stats: 39226 posts, 196 threads

Posting a new thread on /baw/
Options
No.392806
Eating
File deleted
Yet another crazy ideas thread.

Would it be that controversial if museums and airlines introduced free, mandatory gags to put over your babies mouth when they start crying? Or even a bloody plastic bag?
No.419398
Anonymous
Replies:>>419399
>>419397
It is arguable because PS1 does hardware dithering to fake a higher colour count and has such a low resolution that CRT screens make it look better. The screen is way sharper because the CRT can match the resolution of the game, while a flat panel would do some basic bilinear stretching with variable amount of ringing noise to make it run on its native resolution.
PS2 doesn't run in high resolution or in widescreen (except for very few select titles), and many games actually use 480i, so it would look better on a decent CRT too. Except for the games that actually do progressive output, which is not that common.

PS3 and above, games with digital output, will of course look the best on digital panels.
No.419399
Mister Twister
Replies:>>419400
>>419398
You were wise to use the key word, "arguable". Because if you have a good deinterlacer (either built-in or something like a Framemeister), you can make 480i and 576i look good on a flat panel. And, arguably 240/288p of PS1 games does not look better on a CRT, since it introduces black scanlines.
No.419400
Anonymous
>>419399
The problem isn't the deinterlacing but that the low-res polygon graphics look really really blurry when stretched out to a HD panel. A good scaler helps, but those have their own downsides: Framemeister is extremely expensive and EOL, and has huge problems when a game switches resolutions mid-game, while the OSSC is good for 240p and switches resolutions fast but it is absolutely trash for interlaced games (it makes them look WORSE).

the Crt scanlines and shadow mask / aperture grille layouts do end up making the graphics much sharper, since each pixel is more defined, as opposed to a blurry soup on a hd panel.
No.409833
Anonymous
Replies:>>409835
Image:147476447400.png(15kB, 300x300)1226302880236.png
THE ARCHIVES ARE STILL DEAD!

BRING THEM BACK!

BRING BACK THE PLUS4CHAN ARCHIVES!
No.409835
Anonymous
Replies:>>411626
>>409833
HA HA. GOOD LUCK.

I saved the threads I cared about. did you?
No.411626
Mister Twister
>>409835
>saving threads
It's the content you need to save.
No.419334
Anonymous
Just in case you haven't seen them:
https://boards.plus4chan.org/archives.php
No.419191
Help save RMS and Free SoftwareAnonymous
Image:157274987780.jpg(1.16MB, 2048x1536)1570473185738.jpg
Help RMS defeat the tranny faggot sjws destroying Free Software. Learn the truth of what is happening and spread these links everywhere.

https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/
https://medium.com/@whoisylvia/richard-stallman-has-been-vilified-by-those-who-dont-know-him-a3907b25b4c7
https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2019-09/msg00259.html
...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.419215
Anonymous
Replies:>>419216
>>419214
I'm surprised it hasn't been removed yet, seems like a bot post.
No.419216
Anonymous
>>419214
>>419215
I was AFK, it's gone now.
No.419228
Anonymous
>people complain about windows 10 privacy
>that update deletes your personal documents so hackers cant get them
I call that progress
No.419006
Anonymous
Image:156980462949.png(6kB, 768x768)Facebook logo.png
The Plus4chan Facebook group was just archived
No.419011
Anonymous
I quit facebook years ago. Fucking good riddance.
No.419012
Anonymous
Image:156984936206.png(5kB, 500x96)Archived.png
>>419008
You can find the group if you search Plus4chan on Facebook
No.419013
Anonymous
It was probably something that was done automatically due to lack of use. Do we even know who created it?
No.415307
Alpharius
Image:149981646100.png(1.08MB, 736x725)Summer 2017.png
Speak Your Mind: S U M M M E R edition

Please remember to brush and floss your teeth.

Old thread here ==> >>411618
No.418821
Mistir Twistir
>>418820
8chan is necessary, despite its ugliness.
No.418992
Anonymous
Replies:>>418993
Why are so many movie stars cultists?

I mean, scientology is a collection of them, but even Gwyneth Paltrow has her own snake-oil company that also has its own culty scam seminars
No.418993
Anonymous
>>418992
Because stardom makes their lives hell. They can't do as much as go down to the groceries without people flocking over them. Cults are a place where that doesn't matter, and it gives them a sense of belonging too, so when the join they feel a level of appretiation they do not feel elsewhere.

It is one place where they can go to and meet people without stardom being a problem.

That, or they are just scammers who know that people go to cults for that reason, and they try to take advantage of that.
No.418851
Anonymous
Image:156586484905.png(127kB, 280x280)my badge of honor.png
AHEM...
Hello hello… I come in peace.
No.418858
Anonymous
HOLA, SENOR!
No.418861
Janny
Replies:>>418863
Just keep politics in the politics thread and we'll all have a good time.
No.418863
Anonymous
>>418861
The last politics thread is not bumping anymore so might as well use this as the new one?

No.418453
Anonymous
Image:155627880480.gif(34kB, 220x220)tenor.gif
So I recently discovered this site. First of all I appreciate that this place is fully functional without JS. I would like to know if the board software is available. I would love to use it in my site. How does this site control spam though?
No.418462
Anonymous
Replies:>>418465
>>418457
I definitely think those are fair points, I just think in most cases JS should be a bonus enhancer rather then a requirement. On some sites that can't be done, but forums and imageboards rarely have a need to require JS just to load and post (captcha being the biggest exception I can think of)
No.418465
Black Hand ## Developer
>>418462
On a fundamental level, an imageboard (or any social network site for that matter) does not need it, yes, and I do make it a point to get every site I work on done with bare minimum javascript. But on a practical level, the site needs it really badly, to make things simpler and faster for the users. People don't sit in front of the monitor pressing F5 F5 F5 when waiting for replies; they expect their phone to ping to notify them of a new reply. That's just how it is now.

Regardless of that, I want the new design to retain every function of the current one, there must be no regressions. And that means there's still some work left to be done.
No.418675
Black Hand ## Developer
>>418456
>I'm happy to test on demo whenever needed.
I've updated it with an alpha/preview for you to check.
No.418404
Anonymous
Replies:>>418410
Image:155442441895.gif(1.29MB, 195x229)1552369713766.gif
https://boards.plus4chan.org/b/
No.418406
Anonymous
Replies:>>418407
For what purpose?
No.418407
Master Twaster
>>418406
To try and see if it works.
No.418410
Anonymous
>>418404
I noticed yesterday. Time to post.
No.415045
Screencap Thread: plus4chan editionAnonymous
Image:149758133600.png(41kB, 720x1032)They Might Be comrades.png
Previous thread: >>409421
No.418315
Anonymous
Image:155266841807.png(111kB, 1127x681)1446583146509.png
No.418317
Anonymous
Replies:>>418318
Thread is autosaging, so 400 is the limit?
No.418318
Black Hand ## Developer
>>418317
It's 400 on /baw/, 500 on /coc/, should be 300 everywhere else.
No.418157
Anonymous
Image:154698155168.png(259kB, 512x512)ET Contact Tool app.png
ZIN-URU

Poderoso Mantra de Toth Zim Uruyoutube thumb
No.418169
Anonymous
Video:154707458721.webm(1.15MB / 0:00:52 / vp8, 640x480)ohhmmmmmmmmm.webm
I see your ZINURU and raise with OHHMMMMMMMMM.
No.418170
User 9
Replies:>>418217
>>418168
Occasionally being mistaken for spam is just the price of looking enigmatic.
No.418217
Anonymous
>>418170
I can sympathize with that
No.417696
Anonymous
Image:153403009600.png(90kB, 962x1490)5dc6ki6j8jf11.png
Tumblr raw images are no longer accessible. You're now stuck with shitty 1280px downscales.

https://www.reddit.com/r/userscripts/comments/9605e8/
https://www.reddit.com/r/tumblrhelp/comments/961vqf/

complain to:
...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.418055
Anonymous
>>418054
As much as I am happy about tumblr tanking, what alternative is there for NSFW art?
- deviantart only allows nudity, not porno
- pixiv requires censoring (for at least the title pic), they have no RSS feeds
- twitter compresses the shit out of all image files, uses random unidentifiable filenames, and most people flood it with reposts - it's not a gallery/blog, is what I'm saying.
- newsgrounds allows porno but not loli. no RSS
...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.418056
Anonymous
Image:154390757300.jpg(72kB, 535x796)tumblr suicide.jpg
I'm dyin' from laughter here.
No.418057
Anonymous
EVERYTHINGS COMING UP NEWGROUNDS!
No.417852
Anonymous
Image:153853713800.png(420kB, 600x870)gun.png
what if... you had a gun?
No.417898
Anonymous
Replies:>>417899
Image:153965810500.jpg(367kB, 800x586)1294958720520.jpg
I already have a gun. Multiple in fact.
No.417899
Mister Twister
>>417898
Good joj.
No.417902
Anonymous
Exhibition shooting is honestly pretty interesting, and I wouldn't mind taking it up.
No.417845
Anonymous
Replies:>>417847
Image:153848413600.png(90kB, 250x250)Hiroyuki.png
>breaks the site
No.417847
Anonymous
>>417845
Oh, what happened now?
No.416688
Anonymous
Image:151382584000.gif(817kB, 350x262)yuri oh shi.gif
Does this shit work?
No.416697
Anonymous
Image:151390149700.jpg(15kB, 270x270)The_Brotherhood_of_Nod_Emblem.jpg
>>416694
You should put your faith in the Brotherhood instead.
No.416700
Mr. Stone !zWb42fBPMM
>>416693

I put my faith in Blast Hardcheese.
No.417547
Black Hand ## Developer
Image:152918126700.png(70kB, 600x600)nod_logo.png
The Brotherhood provides.
No.416404
moose ## Admin
Image:151144989000.png(49kB, 422x513)rip.png

plus4chan will close enter read-only mode 1/1/2018 is on double-secret probation


No excuses, no speeches, announcement only, final destination.

anonymoose.chan@gmail.com

I have been approached by someone who is not only going to fix the code, but will also help me handle at least some of the day-to-day administration. This is pro bono so I don't have a date for when it will be complete, but at that time we will do a soft-relaunch with the updated software. Until that time, +4 will remain open unless/till we get a nastyspam, and then it will go read-only either for a short time or until improvements are complete.
...
message too long. Click here to view the full post.
No.417539
Anonymous
>>417537
That's a style sheet, not code.
No.417541
Anonymous
test
No.417542
Anonymous
We can close this, finally.