>>395956 Who even cares? Is there some kind of rule that says you must know all the original greats from times long passed? Well, if there is, I'd like to meet the enforcer. Plus, I am getting "how dare you not like what I like" vibes here.
>>396340 iMovie. I used it all the time, and probably not to its full potential. Beware though: you will never be able to do anything groundbreaking with iMovie.
Not youtube poop, but does anyone have the 'Arthur The Missing Episode' dubs? All except the original have been privatised. //youtube.com/watch?v=65NvPDPZwiY
>>399744 Making videos takes a long time, and can be stressful. Why do something that takes up a large percentage of your free time and isn't even fun, if there's no payoff?
No shit people wouldn’t do something “for free” unless they enjoyed it. But the point you seem to miss is that things can stop being fun over time. And even if it doesn't stop being fun, people still have to make money to survive.
Yeah, uh…doing so would probably be skirting some ridiculously thin legal lines concerning for-profit parodies. Most people wouldn’t want to leave themselves open for legal repercussions in that way. The only Patreon I can think of that comes close to what you're suggesting is Team Four Star’s, and they go out of their way to stress that their Patreon is not for DBZ Abridged or Hellsing Abridged.
>>399757 Technically, Fair Use works for parodies regardless of whether or not they're commercial--the issue is that Fair Use is a defense, not a Natural Right, so it doesn't do you any good against people who can afford to take you to court unless you can afford lawyers to defend you.
And the average person would probably give up on making their parodies rather than go to court and defend their rights in an expensive, time-consuming lawsuit.
>computer is somehow glitching every so often, replays the same sound three times in a row before continuing >cant tell if its the YTP or my speakers have part 3 of a 3 & 1/2 part series //youtube.com/watch?v=Dns75B46oCg
Image:145636841500.png(153kB, 440x364)Screen Shot 2016-02-24 at 21.43.34.png
According to this video, YTP is a secret ploy to brainwash children into becoming reclusive monsters who masturbate to fantasy creatures: //youtube.com/watch?v=2wxI7I8sIdw
>>407111 That is what I thought myself, but knowing me giving that guy 1 view is not going to destroy the universe, I clicked anyway. It was the opposite of bad.
From wikipedia, from another website: >Associate professor of cultural anthropology at Kansas State University Michael Wesch has defined YouTube Poop as "absurdist remixes that ape and mock the lowest technical and aesthetic standards of remix culture to comment on remix culture itself" I personally think he may be reading too much into it. I've always considered it a mixture of simple parody, remix, allusion and absurd/non-sequitur based humour. (note: absurd, not absurdist) (but then again, I'm a bit of a philistine when it comes to conventions of art)
There might be a minority that have an artistic social commentary mindset, but I doubt it. I wonder what that guy thinks of Soundclown.
(Don't worry, there's better descriptions on Wikipedia by university people)
>>407230 >Hopefully it lives up to your standards. I am not the king of the thread. You post for other posters and for yourself. Doesn't fucking matter what I think.
>>407238 Yeah I know, but I've gotta aim for something.
In other other news, I finally got a "worst video ever" comment. I think I coped alright. He picked the one I was proud of too. (Wasn't quite a poop but similar genre)
Amazingly, saw my first CS188 vids today, although not the one you linked (yet)
Image:146904841100.png(220kB, 630x411)Screen Shot 2016-07-20 at 16.58.37.png
So, good old Stu is better than ever at pooping, and yet had become touch-ier than ever (disabled comments everywhere) //youtube.com/watch?v=vKUVDpJtOdA
>>409604 Actual audio poops (as opposed to popular "soundclowns", like the one I posted) are rare. I think I've already posted it, but this one is a favourite. https://soundcloud.com/mcmangos/denacious-t
We are number one, but please read the descripton because there is so much going on //youtube.com/watch?v=_MfvMG9IOpU description: It's starts with beat 2 and 4 being switched, then beat 2 and 4 is reversed, then there is some weird panning, then the 1 and 3 is switched, then there is some weird echo in the style of the shepards tone, then it 1,4,2,3 until they fall and break the matrix, leading the song to slow down, and as it steady gets momentum, the matrix is still broken so the switching is randomized until all beat 1s decide to kick in in rapid sucsession, and beat 2 and 3 and 4 also likes that, so they follow straight after and the matrix is still broken so all the versions end up playing the final part before they fade out.
I need to check out the first half of the thread >>393692 >An avant-garde sonic and visual reediting of a short clip from the classic 1962 film "To Kill a Mockingbird." Damn. Very repetitive, but still interesting.
>>412197 >XJ9 I've never watched the show (is it good? what's it similar to?) but I checked out the channel of someone who loves the show and found a video which was just dA deviant art/porn of the show with audio of a little kid gamer autistically screaming "DELET THIS". .com/watch?v=IpIgqTrIzS4. Warning: pregnancy and gay shota.
Despite having a lot of non-sequitur, pitch-changing and repetition/reversal humour (in a typical YTP way), this is surprising sophisticated in parts. It's got a Shakespeare line, a reference to The Treachery of Images and a nice little social comment at the end (starting 4:04).
>>397954 >>407931 Well, I discovered via TVTropes that there's a hidden annotation one each of these two videos on the watermelon during the auto-fellatio scenes that links to a hidden video. It's a different video linked in each of those two Jewniverse videos.
>>414233 In the next five years, I can't see YouTube sinking to second place. It has become very difficult to kill. I think it would require a mass exodus of eCelebrities to damage it, and I can't see that happening unless they seriously, insanely fuck up.
Second place? The probability is low, but nothing is impossible. First place with a smaller gap between first and second than there is now? Far more probable.
YouTube is a bit like WWE right now. Both are the “leader” of their specific area by a country mile, but they also have plenty of smaller competitors that stay afloat because they appeal to different niches. Any one of those competitors could conceivably “break out” and become the clear “second place”, but it will not overtake the “industry leader” unless that company really fucks itself over.
Hey thread, do you think is it fine to call this style of edit a YTP? For the most part, it's splicing/remixing an original cartoon to create an alternate series of events, but at the same time it doesn't really utilise many YTP stylistic conventions.
I'm just wondering if there's another subculture that it fits better.
>>415021 I was meaning to toss my 2cents at this when you first posted them. I like them and I'm very thankful that there wasn't much LOUD audio distortion.
Image:150741706800.png(912kB, 776x660)I should have watched these five years ago.png
Apparently this needs an ear-rape warning? Whatever.
The following programme is intended for an immature audience, it may contain adult themes and sexual references. Viewer discretion advised. //youtube.com/watch?v=6JLeI632kDk
>>416324 The "saas" took me by surprise but this was great. I've actually been looking for a few slightly creepy but not overtly scary edit videos (such as Aliantos's edits, Dmitri Petrov's outros and parts of //youtube.com/watch?v=_DIQKUZIqHo)
I think this is a very good thesis on YTP. Written in 2011, but still relevant. https://stijniethuijs.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/scriptie-youtube-poop-v-2.pdf
>>409606 I think I forgot to post the actual YTP: //youtube.com/watch?v=T-6x6V-6iaY Context: someone made the audio track in a YTP style, this guy added a video to match
Hey meester and anyone else who like, come join this discord. I run it and it will be a little more free to discuss things on than the standard plus4 discord.
>>417720 Are you okay with me talking in depth about crimes like those committed against Junko Furata or Terrell Peterson here? I'm gonna say probably not.
But hey, if anyone wants to go on that Discord that's a lot of the kinds of things I'd be talking about.
Look at the little wunderkind playing the accordion like a true maestro. You can see on the faces of the girls sitting behind him that all pussies in a 100 meter radius are getting wet. The kid's got the moves.
>>421675 There's some talented people out there making stuff on youtube. Remember when this sort of editing was mostly used for Disney shipping music-videos?