/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


File allowance: 3MB mp4, 3MB webm, 3MB swf, 3MB mp3, 3MB gif, 3MB png, 3MB jpg

Thread stats: 199 posts, 15 files (15 image(s))

Toggle poster info Replying to /tnt/987 Close window
Options
No.987
Wiki Maintenance Anonymous
save file
image:163146396419.jpg(504kB , 1906x2732 , sdada.jpg)
This thread is for wiki discussion and maintenance.
No.988
Anonymous
Replies:>>11598
The current site can be located at: https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Special:AllPages
Feel free to discuss whatever in this thread regarding the tournament wiki page but you shouldn't expect fast replies.
No.990
Anonymous
Replies:>>991
save file
image:163146455276.png(295kB , 680x338 , E6399B2B-A86D-48B9-AAE8-51FDA8E2AAD2.png)
>>987
No.991
Anonymous
>>990
Brooke CONFIRMED to have HUGE tits but CORAL IS FLAT BTFO
No.992
Anonymous
Replies:>>8523
>>987
I love Colette so damn much.
No.993
Anonymous
Replies:>>994>>1036
>>987
Will there be a page for Orel Peterson or Ceasar Anon?
No.994
Anonymous
Replies:>>1019
>>993
Is there a way to archive voice clips on the wiki?
No.1019
Anonymous
Replies:>>1020
>>994
Transcripting them?
No.1020
Anonymous
>>1019
Damn. Sounds hard for 15+ Minute clips
No.1024
Anonymous
Want to remind you that any of the 128 girls who are in this tournament are eligible for a page on the wiki. You have to make it though if you want to see it
Also thanks for the anons helping out on the wiki. I'll add the current results in a little
No.1036
Anonymous
>>993
https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Vocaroos
No.1339
Anonymous
save file
image:163175427820.jpg(42kB , 1280x720 , kronkby.jpg)
Could someone add some information about Round 4 for Mr /co/ in 2019? Would especially appreciate it from someone who was actually there to experience it, but it can go either way.

Here's a post about it made from /co/ to get an idea:
---------

The main thing was Bugs Bunny vs Zim, which lead to not only to shitflinging, but a massive trap-off to see which character looked best in girl clothes (note that this was the year Enter the Florpus came out so the board was in a bit of a Zim-rush)

Not only that, but there was also Kronk vs Grievous, the silent majority winner vs one of the most hyped up contestants of the tournament due to all the amazing OC Grievous got. So there were definitely alot of posts about that matchup thrown in the mix.

There were also folks heavily seething about Joker, for he was able to knock out both Donald AND Daffy (essentially preventing a hyped up Donald vs Daffy matchup from happening in Round 3) and there was paranoia that the ones voting for Joker were trolls from /tv/. In the end, Joker lost to Skeletor by ONE vote.

Oh, and there was a bit of Skeleton Gang posting in there as well. Including some involving the match up of Iroh vs Grim.

The only time Mr /co/ ever came close to the show of Round 4 was the Finals in 2020, where the gay wedding event happened.
No.1358
Anonymous
Replies:>>1430
>https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Miss_Pauling
Wiki admins might want to lock this down before it gets ugly.
No.1429
Anonymous
Replies:>>1437
Should poll pictures be added to the Ms. /co/ 2021 page?
No.1430
Anonymous
>>1358
it's quickly deleted, but i'm going to reconstruct her article with relevant info (why she's technically /co/, contest history, pictures etc.) But it's gonna be slow because i need to read the tf2 comics
No.1437
Anonymous
>>1429
I think there should be a redirect to a separate compilation page instead, because that's 128 pictures of girls that will be put there.
But before that the poll pics should be uploaded first.
No.1442
Anonymous
ADD TOURNEY ANON.
AS A WARNING.
No.1526
Anonymous
Replies:>>1527
Someone needs to write longer history/details for the other winners.
No.1527
Anonymous
Replies:>>1543>>1632
>>1526
Yeah I apologize for that (I made several big-candidate pages a while back and all I had were blurbs, other editors seemed to have a lot more to provide). What should be added to some winner?
No.1528
Anonymous
Replies:>>1533>>1544
>>1442
If we add toruney anon we would probably have to add f*se. Do they deserve it?
No.1533
Anonymous
Replies:>>1544
save file
image:163217384211.png(406kB , 1256x767 , yu548.png)
>>1442
>>1528
According to TourneyAnon himself he's done with all the tournament hosting stuff and is focusing on OC and campaigning.
No.1543
Anonymous
>>1527
Jenny's involvement and importance in the contest should be lengthened.

https://msco.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1182
No.1544
Anonymous
Replies:>>1547
>>1442
>>1533
Not the original, but I think we should add Tourney Anon just in case he gets the idea of coming back. I know he did that for both Queen and King /v/ last year.

>>1528
Yes. As a warning.

Though I'd also recommend either adding in Fuse's BTFO moment by Black Hand or making his article boring to read. Don't make him out to be a martyr or something like that.
No.1547
Anonymous
>>1544
>I know he did that for both Queen and King /v/ last year.
He technically didn't come back for those though.
Queen was his first attempt and he was chill during King.
No.1550
Anonymous
Replies:>>1551>>1553
Just double-checking, but a character needs to qualify for Mr./Ms. /co/ or have an overwhelming presence otherwise (like Ramses in the RP) to get a page, right? So individual characters who qualified for Tag-Team don't get their own page?
No.1551
Anonymous
Replies:>>1552
>>1550
Wilkins got a page despite never qualifying for Mr. /co/
No.1552
Anonymous
>>1551
He got in the tag tourney.
No.1553
Anonymous
Replies:>>1554
>>1550
Pretty much, tag-team entries won't count unless they are particularly notable. The is a case by case basis because there are examples of characters who were significant despite not making a tourney (or stuff like Henchgwen which can't qualify but are significant oc)
For example the Goldfish one, if no goldfish qualify, will likely either be merged into one goldfish page or be removed if it's not enough info
No.1554
Anonymous
Replies:>>1558
>>1553
Are you going to add the OP images for the Results/Afterparty
No.1558
Anonymous
>>1554
>OP images for the Results/Afterparty
Have no idea what you mean by this dude
No.1559
Anonymous
Just yesterday I managed to add General Grievous, Twig, Chris McClean and The Monarch's pages to the wiki. They're not exactly detailed, but I could probably get to them later if someone else doesn't (though I may be real busy this October). There's also a page for Grim now.

Might make pages for Dan, Mao Mao, Joker, Godzilla and Zim later, assuming someone else doesn't want to make them first.
No.1561
Anonymous
Replies:>>1570
>>1559
>I managed to add General Grievous, Twig, Chris McClean and The Monarch's pages to the wiki.
As a RPer i know quite a lot about them so if you need some more info just ask.
Sorry but i don't know how to work on a Wiki.
No.1562
Anonymous
Replies:>>1563
Anon who posted the general records won by the E8, you probably found them around the tourney. Might as well posting here the records of all E8 since I don't know how to work a wiki. Some of those might be already inserted, but you never know.
>Oldest Members: Betty Boop for Ms./co/ (1930) and Daffy for Mr./co/ (1937)
>Youngest Members: Fang for Ms./co/ (October 2019, beating Spinel by a month) and WALL-E for Mr./co/ (June 2008; Beating Doofenshmirtz by 5 months)
>Highest seeds: Superman (2018; top seed) and Spinel (2019; top seed)
>Lowest seeds: Black Canary (2018; 66th) and Hugh Neutron (2020; 53rd)
>Highest seed winners: Spinel for Ms./co/ (1st) and Johnny Bravo for Mr./co/ (4th)
>Lowest seed winners: Jenny Wakeman for Ms./co/ (37th) and Tom for Mr./co/ (46th)
>Winner with the smallest vote margin: Betty Boop (Won by 10 votes)
>Winner with the largest vote margin: Spinel (Won by 186 votes*)
>From the same channel: Cartoon Network with 18 characters (Counting also Raven and Starfire because of Teen Titans; Batman and Superman because of Batman: The Brave and the Bold and Justice League Action; and Daffy Duck because of Duck Dodgers)
>First non-american characters: Jucika (Hungary) and Wallace (UK), both of them in the same year
>All the main characters from Courage the Cowardly Dog have been at least once in their respective E8 (Although I'm not sure if they're the first, since I don't know if you only need to count Samurai Jack and Aku as the main characters for that to beat the record already or characters like Ashi and the Scotsman are considered main characters)
Also, other records, not necessarily from the Elite 8:
>Rounds with the smallest vote margin for Ms./co/: Jinx VS Wonder Woman (2018; Jinx wins by 1 vote); Hekapoo VS Demencia (2020; Hekapoo wins by 1 vote)
>Rounds with the smallest vote margin for Mr./co/: Captain America VS Courage (2018; Cap wins by 1 vote); Skeletor VS The Joker (2019; Skeletor wins by 1 vote); Daffy Duck VS Samurai Jack
(2020; Daffy wins by 1 vote). As of now, Mr./co/ had for three consecutive years at least one matchup that was determined by 1 vote
No.1563
Anonymous
>>1562
Also, might as well add the records won in the Tag Team Tournament, if you want them to be lumped with the rest. Although it's more of a Final Four:
>Oldest members: The Power of Two with Oswald the Lucky Rabbit and Mickey Mouse (1927 and 1928 respectively), if you include these tournaments with the rest, Oswald is the oldest finalist
>Youngest members: North Pole Express with Klaus and Jesper Johansson (November 2019), if included, they are both the youngest finalists
>The Freelance Police (Sam and Max) are the first winners that originated from a comic
>The Wiley Eggs (Robotnik and Dr. Wiley) are the first finalists that didn't originate from a comic or a cartoon
No.1564
Anonymous
Replies:>>1566
>>1559
>Might make pages for Dan, Mao Mao, Joker, Godzilla and Zim later, assuming someone else doesn't want to make them first.

Why those ones in particular?
No.1566
Anonymous
>>1564
>Because of....

Mao Mao's Round 1 curse + RP

Dan's RP

Joker disrupting the hyped up "Duck Bowl" in 2019 and only losing to Skeletor by one vote

Godzilla for not "exactly" being /co/ yet having a presence in contests (I know Eggman at least got one), plus he seems to have gotten into every Mr /co/ so far.

Zim for the trap off in 2019 and that he may have been in every contest now I believe?
No.1570
Anonymous
>>1561
The wiki isn't hard to figure out and if you're stuck you can just copy another character's page (I find it easier to switch from 'visual editing' to 'source editing') and change the details around. As long as you don't fuck with any of the important pages or undo a lot of someone else's work, you're fine.
No.1571
Anonymous
Replies:>>1573
Should I bother to go back and make some screencaps or would that be a complete waste of time?
No.1573
Anonymous
Replies:>>1574
>>1571
Any moments in particular you were thinking of? You could also add them to the booru if you aren't sure.
No.1574
Anonymous
Replies:>>1579
>>1573
Janny deletion of the nomination thread or at least the parts that I can still find archived
No.1579
Anonymous
>>1574
I do have an IMGUR of some posts I screenshotted of people bitching on the nomination thread getting deleted.
No.1582
Anonymous
>>1559
>Might make pages for Dan, Mao Mao, Joker, Godzilla and Zim later, assuming someone else doesn't want to make them first.
Nah you can
No.1586
Anonymous
Replies:>>1588>>1593
save file
image:163242267633.png(142kB , 496x389 , 1597465315604.png)
Would you guys like me to make character plates for 2019? I can get around to it until next week at the earliest.
No.1588
Anonymous
Replies:>>1590
>>1586
I'm strongly against this. That year doesn't deserve commemoration and it honestly would just be a waste of your time when you have to do another 128 plates a week after.
No.1590
Anonymous
Replies:>>1591
>>1588
It doesn't have to be next week, though if I did do it and since I said I would try to help with King/Queen /v/, I probably wouldn't get to it until January. I'll ask during Mr. /co/ and if a lot of responses are like yours I won't do it.
No.1591
Anonymous
>>1590
I'll add right here too, if the previous bracketsanon was vehemently against it too I'll drop it.
No.1593
Anonymous
Replies:>>1594
>>1586
Please no. That would just be a waste of time.

Making special brackets for Queen and King /v/ though....
No.1594
Anonymous
Replies:>>1598
>>1593
>/v/ is even trying to steal our tournament OC creators
What does /a/ not steal
No.1596
Anonymous
Is there a king and queen of /v/ dedicated wiki? I'm creating articles on some of their tournaments on my home wikia such as these:
https://saimoe.fandom.com/wiki/King_of_/v/_2019
https://saimoe.fandom.com/wiki/King_of_/v/_2020
https://saimoe.fandom.com/wiki/Queen_/v/_2019
https://saimoe.fandom.com/wiki/Queen_/v/_2020

I'm considering transferring them into the Mr & Ms. /co/ wikia so that there's only one place to upload the character icon templates. But if anons don't like it, then the /v/ tournaments will remain in the above links instead.

I'm also planning to create a page on Miss /aco/ 2021 if that event manages to finish.
No.1598
Anonymous
>>1594
2/3 of the /v/ tournament threads are just /co/ crossposters if you haven't already realized by reading those threads.
No.1602
Anonymous
Slowly working on a table for the Tag-Team Tournament.
No.1632
Anonymous
>>1527
>https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Captain_America
Surprised this one doesn't have anything
No.1655
Anonymous
Replies:>>2051
>https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Dan_(Dan_Vs.)
Damn...I'm impressed by the autism levels
No.2026
Anonymous
the bracket for mr. /co/ 2021 in the wiki is finally finished
https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Mr._/co/lympus_2021
No.2031
Anonymous
Alastor qualified. He needs to go on the Qualified part of the NavBox.

https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Template:Male_Characters_Navbox
No.2051
Anonymous
Replies:>>8518
>>1655
Danfag is insanely autistic as we all know
I'm surprised the Maoanon hasn't made a page yet
No.2059
Anonymous
Welp, Grievous has won.

Do you think we could get some people to expand more on his page?

Or at least add his streaks from this year and last year?
No.2060
Anonymous
Replies:>>2092
Just gonna point out Blacksad has a page while the other detectives (apart from Mao Mao) don't yet. I'd do it myself but I'm not well versed in Mr. /co/ lore
No.2074
Anonymous
Replies:>>2075
save file
image:163484369685.png(3kB , 162x185 , 1634210021125.png)
I think most winners desperately need to have their pages expanded upon. It's quite alarming how characters like Dan get Bibles for pages (though I must say he is sort of an isolated case here), but heavy-hitters with a high presence and long board and tournament history like Skeletor are a blank slate. I would do it myself, but I'm rather busy right now.
No.2075
Anonymous
Replies:>>2076
>>2074
It's because the winner are the least interesting characters, people don't actually care about them, they're actually the biggest losers of these tournaments.
No.2076
Anonymous
>>2075
That's a gigantic cope and you know it. Plenty of Elite Eight members have their own dedicated fanbases on top of being generally well-known to begin with. Sheila and Grievous in particular have been some of the highlights of their respective years.
No.2092
Anonymous
>>2060
Huh, Mao Mao actually doesn't have a page yet
No.8516
Anonymous
Replies:>>8517
Should Queen and King of /v/ be added too, or simply give them their own wiki?
No.8517
Anonymous
>>8516
I say they should have their own wiki because they can stand on their own
No.8518
Anonymous
Replies:>>8519
>>2051
and now we know why lmfao
No.8519
Anonymous
Replies:>>8520>>8522
>>8518
We do?
No.8520
Anonymous
Replies:>>8521>>8522
>>8519
tourney was rp'ing as dan right?
No.8521
Anonymous
>>8520
No, he was the Chris McClean rper.
No.8522
Anonymous
Replies:>>8527
>>8519
>>8520
It was TempAnon.
No.8523
Anonymous
Replies:>>8524
>>992
>I love Colette so damn much.
I said this once and I have to say it again.
I love Colette so damn much.
No.8524
Anonymous
>>8523
Yeah /co/lette is good, she deserves the staying power she has had as a board creation.
No.8526
Anonymous
Replies:>>8527
save file
image:164425939136.jpg(197kB , 1280x720 , 1533482961145.jpg)
I THINK /CO/LETTE SUCKS!
User was banned for this post
No.8527
Anonymous
save file
image:164427122136.jpg(49kB , 780x438 , pipe-weed-seems-a-lot-like-marijuana-1508529821.jpg)
>>8526
lol
>>8522
ah my bad, I got them mixed up
No.8611
Anonymous
Replies:>>8612>>8613
save file
image:164548483531.gif(57kB , 550x351 , 1593020370035.gif)
Just made a page for Sam and Max. Are there any other characters which need to have their own dedicated page?
No.8612
Anonymous
>>8611
Izzy and Cherri
No.8613
Anonymous
Replies:>>8614
>>8611
Sauce?
No.8614
Anonymous
Replies:>>8615
>>8613
Eh, the gif? That's from Symphony of the Night.
No.8615
Anonymous
>>8614
Thank you.
No.8774
Anonymous
save file
image:164841098343.png(64kB , 383x95 , reimu.png)
Just a few things:

At the moment, every winner (to the exception of Spinel) has been given their own gallery section on their respective page. Should everyone get a gallery too, or just leave it for the champions and some select exceptions? It might sound like a very inconsequential question, but I want to know what other anons think as it has been suggested before. Personally, I'm more inclined to declare it a champion exclusive thing given the wiki already links to the booru a making a gallery for everyone else sounds like a ton of work on top of all the wiki maintenance that's yet to be done.

The other thing I want to mention is that I'm considering doing full personalized brackets for Queen and King of /v/, as long as the current bracket anon for the /co/ tourneys or anybody else interested is ok with me stepping in here.
No.9072
wikifag
>>9066
(Posting to appropriate thread)
i meant learning the text formatting like bolds, italics, links, and templates lol
but yeah, this is a fandom wikia, you have to embrace your inner autism there
IMO it really does depend on how much the contributor knows about the series and /co/ culture, and whether they are motivated enough to actually write it

i personally follow a loose guideline like this:
>here is character from [insert whatever series and their origins]
>here is their general character info
>as a /co/mpetitor, they're blah blah blah
>they are popular on /co/ because [reason], they gained a reputation because [something something tourney history], etc.
>insert tournament history, when they appeared, what results, add notable moments, include some lore-related stuff.

admittedly it does sound dry and boring sometimes. of course not all articles are perfectly written, and there's bound to be wrong or missing info that pops up. unfortunately it all falls solely on the users to correct it.
No.10003
Anonymous
Replies:>>10007
There's a month and a few days until Ms /co/
What should get updated or created?
No.10007
Anonymous
Replies:>>10032
>>10003
Izzy’s page is blank
No.10032
Anonymous
>>10007
If pages are blank or terrible quality and they aren’t Elite 8 or above they should probably be removed. They can always be remade when someone wants to make it
No.10442
Anonymous
RadioAnon/Psyanon here. When I get a chance, I'll make/update the pages for the vocaroos. I noticed some of them were incomplete or missing altogether. Someone mentioned having .mp3 uploads at some point, but it never came up. Is there a reliable place to host the files in case vocaroo croaks?
No.10444
Anonymous
>>10442
Maybe a file sharing site?
No.10479
Anonymous
>>10442
Go on archive.org, make a free account, go to the audio file section and make an archive of all the files at one place (or maybe one per tournament).
Easiest and probably safest way to archive them outside having copies locally stored yourself
No.10722
Anonymous
Most female character pages are up to date, a number of them still need to be slightly updated with format or results but they can be done when the newest ms /co/ results are ready. There's a few character pages that are barely filled out or not at all and might be deleted if no one fills them out after the tournament ends. You can always remake them if you fill it out fully though
If you are going to make a new page for a character who qualified for any tournament, just make sure a decent amount of information about them and their results are there when the page is made
No.11283
Anonymous
sooooo, is anyone gonna tell the wiki the news
No.11285
Anonymous
>>11283
Wikifag here, we’re mostly going to be busy updating character pages. Shirley was in the final so she gets 2nd place, if you are wondering that.
No.11287
Anonymous
>>11283
If this is about Chel and Shirley, I'm not gonna mess with what's on the wiki. Also gonna ask any anons genuinely angry about this year to not fuck with the wiki in general.
No.11445
Anonymous
>>11287
Nvm should Chel and Shirley just be switched?
No.11448
Anonymous
>>11445
Yes.
No.11449
Anonymous
>>11445
>>11287
I’m angrier that you’re listening to one guy. Instead of everyone else. There’s one dude on /co/ going thread to thread complaining. How do you know it’s him?
He says the same crap everytime.

If you looked at the post where NSA reveals that placing Shirley in third was not a mistake. You see most of the anons cheering for dabbing on riggers. That thread had the most posters.
https://boards.4channel.org/co/thread/132933033#p132934399

Please don’t be the only one letting them win.
No.11450
Anonymous
>>11449
I'm not a wiki admin which is why I'm hesitant to do the changes myself.
No.11451
Anonymous
>>11450
Didn’t they say in the Ms. /co/ thread on here, they would change it? Or was that you?
No.11452
Anonymous
>>11285
Shirley gets 2nd place. Anon that’s pretty fucked.
No.11458
Anonymous
Replies:>>11467
>>11285
Huh? What kind of cockamamie shit is this? Shirley got to finals by cheating and was disqualified.
No.11467
Anonymous
>>11458
you don’t let a character into finals and then “disqualify” them after the whole thing is over and they’ve already lost
and admittedly we don’t have a precedent for this, but if you’re going to disqualify someone it should entail more than just bumping them down one rank. it would make more sense to mark them as, you know, disqualified. DQ’d.
and you don’t do any of this without having a proper matchup with the real finalists and arguably one for 3rd place as well.
what NSA did is little more than lip service for a problem he knew about but couldn’t be assed to fix. he can say whatever he wants, but the poll results, the rules and procedures of Ms. /co/, and the way in which a bracket works all say otherwise. Rigged or not, Shirley went to finals and lost. Therefore, she is 2nd. Chel lost the semifinals but won the match for 3rd. Therefore, she is 3rd.
No.11468
Anonymous
Replies:>>11477
>>11467
>You don't disqualify a rigging character.
Yeah ok. Nobody wants this.
Also everyone knows the moderators wouldn't allow another thread. There was no way to do a match between them. You've been reposting this nonsense since everyone blew you the fuck out.
Fuck off rig fag.
No.11469
Anonymous
>>11467
You've been trying to change the narrative all this time. This is pathetic.
>>11285
And this is ridiculous. Shirley was in the final because she cheated. We all know it. He showed it. Nobody agreed with letting her through but the cheaters. So now you're saying the host who did a vote and got the overwhelming majority of people saying remove riggers can't remove a character who shouldn't of been there in the first place? That's insane. Wiki guys just make up rules. At least the fuckin host gauged reactions. This is just pulled out of your ass to agree with cheaters.

If you're going to ignore the final result then why not just put whoever you want up there? Since you're going to do what you want anyway. No matter how many anons don't want that.
>>11449
This. There's way more positive replies. And you can tell which negative ones are from the same guy. Then the ones that say Chel should fight Fang don't disagree with the demotion. They just wanted another chance at finals.
No.11470
Anonymous
Replies:>>11477
>>11287
>>11445
>>11469
I think the simplest way to put it is.
>In a tourney. Or competition. If someone has been discovered cheating, are they disqualified and punished?
Pretty obvious answer.
No.11472
Anonymous
>>11285
Ignoring the argument, but the "winning" image with Fang and Shirley was quickly made. Seemed more like trolling. The quality is shotty.The image used for Fang looks bad because it was someone else's then upscaled. The Elite 8 are grey like in Betty Boop's. I just wanted to point that out.
No.11475
Anonymous
save file
image:166309913078.jpg(1.68MB , 2448x3264 , Manwithtinfoilhat.jpg)
call me crazy but are the narrativefags, the wikifags and the riggerniggers all the same person/group?
No.11477
Anonymous
>>11468
>>11469
>>11470
if shirley had been removed earlier as opposed nightshift doing 6D chess last minute rule changes we wouldn't be having this conversation.
the conversation we would be having is "can hosts just straight up remove characters they think are cheating?" but that's a lot less asinine than what we have now.
No.11478
Anonymous
>>11475
What's a narrative fag?
No.11479
Anonymous
Replies:>>11481
>>11477
They can now. Anytime they remove cheating votes they are.
I think a host should remove cheating characters. Else we end up with this. The host seeing cheating and being powerless to stop it makes me feel like we should remove all rules.
No.11481
Anonymous
Replies:>>11482
>>11479
removing cheating votes is not removing cheating characters. anyone worth his salt will agree hosts should remove cheating votes, of course they should. and if the character loses because of that, that's perfectly fine. but to remove a character by fiat? that is out of line.
and before you ask what the difference is, in the former case the character's elimination is a consequence of the host's expected duties as a facilitator. the latter is the host directly interfering in the tournament.
and before you say "why are you talking about this it never happened" i know
No.11482
Anonymous
Replies:>>11487
>>11481
I don't even know what you're talking about. Anytime a host removes votes we assume they are being truthful. Removing a cheater before the round ends or after the round ends makes no difference.
When a character cheats and you know it. They are disqualified. This is basic shit that happens in every other tourney. Any host with common sense would do this. People have won and then had their awards removed. I don't even know what you're arguing. Are you saying Shirley and Nichole shouldn't even be on the winner's podium? Then I agree.
No.11484
Anonymous
>>11450
Do it.
No.11485
Anonymous
>>11285
Other tourneys/competitions
>Cheaters discovered cheating and win lose their medal.
4chan tourney
>Cheaters can outright say they're cheating. The audience says kick them out, and wikifags will have them stay on the as winners. Making the competitions and the wiki not match, and leading to confusion for new anons.
Genius idea. So now the wiki is obsolete, and only hurts the reader.
No.11486
Anonymous
>>11477
>can hosts just straight up remove characters they think are cheating?"
That's basically what removing rigged votes is.
No.11487
Anonymous
>>11482
>People have won and then had their awards removed.
yeah, because of shit discovered after the fact. Nightshift knew there was rigging for Shirley and, instead of doing his job and removing the rigged votes, let Shirley move on.
No.11488
Anonymous
>>11487
No, he asked anons what he should do. He discovered her rigging for the first time in round 3. We were all told.
Even then, that's still not a good excuse for why we should let her take second place. This is a pisspoor reason for your defense.
No.11489
Anonymous
>>11487
Didn't you say he removed her placing after the fact? Didn't he discover rigging in the final round? That means by your logic he still did the right thing.
Finding out rigging and removing them.
Also they will void your win even before the match ends. This happens in other competitions.
No.11490
Anonymous
>>11489
He can't even keep his argument straight. This is the retard wikifags are listening to.
No.11491
Anonymous
Replies:>>11574
>>11475
No, I'm completely fine with changing Chel to 2nd place and adding the new e8 image. I'd just like the person who runs the wiki to OK it too or else we might get a Spinel situation with those pages locked down.
No.11492
Anonymous
>>11489
>Didn't he discover rigging in the final round?
he discovered rigging in round 3, and did nothing.
and if he didn't know there was rigging until the final round, then what the hell was up with that gambit with the rules vote?

but fine, maybe you're right. maybe he didn't know about this stuff until the results came in. so why, dear anon, did he not
1. remove the rigged votes and leave it at that, or
2. disqualify shirley entirely instead of just fudging the placements
because again, I wouldn't even be arguing with you if Shirley had been completely disqualified. but she wasn't.
No.11493
Anonymous
>>11492
>he discovered rigging in round 3, and did nothing.
He did nothing because "we" told him to do nothing. Considering how fucking angry people get over these contests and with the hosts I'm not surprised he went with it.
No.11495
Anonymous
CHEL DID NOT COMPETE FOR SECOND PLACE, SHIRLEY DID.
In no honest tournament in the history of man has a new rule been introduced at the exact end of tournament to be used to retroactively disqualify a participant for a previous round. It makes no sense and it's unfair for everyone involved. The moment Fang and Shirley were declared the finalists was the moment the positions were set in stone and nothing can change that. You cannot "demote" a participant.
No.11498
Anonymous
Replies:>>11572
>>11495
yeah what this guy said
No.11499
Anonymous
>>11495
At bare minimum can we get a fucking better e8 image, what's on the wiki is embarrassing comparing to the one the drawfag made.
No.11502
Anonymous
let's just have the wiki show shirley in 2nd in the fan art and have a controversy section where it explains how she also is in 3rd etc etc
I don't think we're ever gonna come to terms on who won what and even though I'm on NSA's side applying the rule change was damage control thanks to not sorting out the rigging in round 3
No.11514
Anonymous
Replies:>>11572
>>11502
What I'm thinking of doing is adding the elite eight pic the drawfag made to Fang's, Chel's and Shirley's pages and noting them as "alternatives". I also wrote about the controversy on Fang's and Chel's entries and I'll add it to Shirley's when I get around to doing hers.
No.11572
Anonymous
>>11492
Shirley was rigging then she shouldn't be in the finals. This is a non argument. You're just saying Shirley needs to be removed. Which I agree with. So regardless Chel gets second place by default.
>>11495
In no tournament has a cheater been allowed to keep their trophies. Nothing is set in stone. You can change who gets what based on that in every tournament. You said this same exact dumb shit before.
>>11498
Samefag
>>11502
Let's just have the wiki not match the tourney. Have the wiki show her in 3rd or completely disqualified then say she was caught cheating. I can't comprehend how stupid you have to be to think this shit would fly in any other competition. Lance Armstrong won 7 awards and had ALL of them revoked. The rule change happened because round three the samefag troll said to let them through, because NightShift couldn't gauge most reactions. Now wiki fags are gauging it based on the same thing we all know is bad. When the final poll said take rigging characters out.
It's so blatant this is trolling. There is no artwork of Shirley or Nichole winning. There is no thread celebrating them. But Chel and Fang have threads cheering them on. There's like 200 ips between them. The after party threads complaining had like 30 ips.
The "winning" image is poorly made. It was quickly made too. Why would someone who truly believes in those results make an image with no effort? Everything about this idea is so dumb you might as well ignore the host, psyanon, and the majority of voters.
>>11514
Basing your decision on trolls instead of us is just ridiculous. The wiki should remove Johnny bravo and put Captain America instead. After all he "won" in the poll. If you think Shirley should get second place because of this logic then Captain America should get first.
No.11574
Anonymous
Replies:>>11580
>>11491
The wiki guy said he was concerned about change wars. But he can lock pages? I don't understand. So he's willing to leave up inaccurate info, and complain when someone trolls and tries to replace it but he can just block them? Does the main wikiguy read these threads or does he operate on his own.
>>11572
I'm going to look at your points.
>More ips agree with the change.
Looking at it yeah. Even here most people seem to be arguing against the wiki.
>Trolls made the final image.
I didn't even notice how bad it looked. But yeah. All asterisk posting was quickly made.
>Other contests would disqualify her
I wonder if NSA thought of this? Because he really should of did it.
>Wiki not matching the tourney it can lead to confusion.
This is a big problem. How will we actually know who won? The threads and the polls will say different. If wiki anons want to make revisionist history then their wiki is less accurate.
>All others but the wiki said Chel is in second place.
Wiki looks mismanaged when you point that out. Like they have their own horse in this race.
No.11575
Anonymous
>>11572
>Nothing is set in stone.
maybe that's the problem. maybe hosts shouldn't be allowed to do whatever they want and change rules without asking or telling anyone. maybe, and hear me out, maybe that's been the entire problem with Nightshift from day one.
No.11576
Anonymous
>>11575
What rules did he change? He waited until he got approval by a vote. The letting Shirley in was less legitimate than him removing her.

And again. How do you argue against every other competition revoking awards from a person who was caught cheating. Either during the event or after?
No.11577
Anonymous
>>11575
He waited til anons gave him the abilty to. Then he did. He's been pretty by the book.
No.11578
Anonymous
>>11575
All hosts should have basic powers.
>Check for cheating.
>Remove cheater.

Almost like it an unspoken rule too.
No.11579
Anonymous
Replies:>>11581
>>11576
Listening to samefags is more appropriate than listening to the poll. Lmao.
No.11580
Anonymous
>>11574
>The wiki guy said he was concerned about change wars. But he can lock pages? I don't understand. So he's willing to leave up inaccurate info, and complain when someone trolls and tries to replace it but he can just block them? Does the main wikiguy read these threads or does he operate on his own.
No, I can't lock pages, I'm not one of the admins. I just like making/editing pages. If I was, yes I'd just go with NSA's ruling and change Chel to 2nd and lock a few pages for a month or two so people would chill out. I've been hanging around this thread stupidly hoping someone in charge of the wiki would show up and give us the go ahead to make the changes.
No.11581
Anonymous
>>11579
This. Wikianons just don't have any logic. Even now I don't think there is a real argument against moving Chel to second. I voted Shirley until she was revealed as rigged because of her campaign.
Why didn't Wikianons create a vote if they wanted to get the reactions of voters? Why aren't the wiki guys and the hosts working together?
No.11582
Anonymous
Replies:>>11584
>>11576
>He waited until he got approval by a vote.
he deleted every vote that didn't give him approval
No.11583
Anonymous
Replies:>>11588
>>11580
If wiki guys don't follow this thread why is it up?
No.11584
Anonymous
Replies:>>11602
>>11582
We saw the poll. Even with the cheater's votes in, it still was an overwhelming yes. You just made it obvious you cheated.
No.11585
Anonymous
Replies:>>11590
>>11580
Were you the one in the Ms. /co/ thread saying you'd change it if art was made of the real winners?
No.11586
Anonymous
Replies:>>11587
>>11581
Wikifags went the way of Stats anon. Sad they died in that car accident too.
No.11587
Anonymous
>>11586
I meant to reply to this
>>11580
No.11588
Anonymous
>>11581
>>11583
First of all there is no "wiki guys". We're not like an official branch of the competitions, there's just some of us who consistently show up every now and then to edit the pages. I wouldn't know how to get in touch with any of them if you asked me. But there's nothing stopping any of you in this thread from making the edits, you don't even need an account. I imagine this thread was made for shit like "should this character/event get a page" and questions about codes or whatever, not this shitshow we're currently dealing with. My fear that there would be an editing war is sincere, especially since I don't have the power to lock entries.
No.11589
Anonymous
>>11575
Nothing is set in stone.
The future isn't guaranteed.
We can only live life like today is our last day.
No.11590
Anonymous
Replies:>>11591
>>11588
Anon please answer me.
>>11585
No.11591
Anonymous
Replies:>>11593
>>11590
I don't remember saying that so probably not
No.11592
Anonymous
>>11588
I meant why isn't the guy in charge of the wiki here? Does he read any of this? The hosts have organization and open ways to speak to em. NighgShift has his email on the site just for you to message him. It shouldn't be hard to speak to them especially if they put up this thread.
Not blaming you. It just seems redundant.
No.11593
Anonymous
>>11591
So that might have been them hopefully.
No.11594
Anonymous
>>11588
So you're the only one reading these threads? Damn. I don't want to change the wiki just for them to revoke it and ban me etc. I just want them to answer why they did what they did.
No.11595
Anonymous
>>11588
I feel like an editing war would be caused by one anon. He's been using the wiki to troll so I would correct the wiki then lock it.
No.11596
Anonymous
>>11588
Sorry you have to go through this. But it just feels like a wiki thread made by wiki guys should have the main editor in them. I thought this page would be for telling them mistakes, or asking to add pictures.
No.11598
Anonymous
>>988
Guys it says don't expect fast replies. They'll get to it eventually.
No.11599
Anonymous
Replies:>>11601
One of the ''wiki guys'' here. The admin is "MrMsCo", who was last active three days ago. Don't know if he's actually been in this thread or not. As far as I know the best that could be done (if you feel his approval is necessary) is to message wall him.
No.11601
Anonymous
Replies:>>11604
>>11599
I want to but what’s his email? Message wall him? If you got a link or something I’m willing to do it.
No.11602
Anonymous
Replies:>>11603
>>11584
no you fucking tard, it doesn't matter how much one option won by. if he was deleting votes for the other option, he had clearly made up his mind already. those new rules weren't even supposed to go into effect until the next tournament.
the guy with a history of changing rules behind the scenes changed rules behind the scenes, and he's a turbonigger, and Shirley is in 2nd regardless of what he says because she made it to the finals and that's how tournaments work. if you have a problem with any of this, you can gargle my ballsack.
No.11603
Anonymous
>>11602
Tournaments don’t allow cheaters to keep their place. That’s not how tournaments work.
No.11604
Anonymous
>>11601
https://mrmsco.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:MrMsCo
No.11613
Anonymous
save file
image:166318274900.png(2.28MB , 1679x873 , Ms co 2022.PNG)
The homepage for the wiki should change it's "Current Ms. /co/ Tournament" to "Latest Ms. /co/ Tournament" and use this image.
No.11633
Anonymous
Just noticed the wiki's color scheme is Jenny. Intentional or not that's cool.
No.11642
Anonymous
So called admin of the Wiki here
>Why were you gone the past week?
I started a new job and have little to no time right now
>Can you update the frontpage?
Done
>What should be done about Chel/Shirley?
Still undecided, I think best case is mark both 2nd/3rd and make a note about the circumstance It's a very tough shell to crack because it's never been done before but you can input your thoughts
>Can you lock ______ or ban _____
I haven't been following edits the past week so I don't know what people want locked or what vandalism is being made, please be more specific with examples
>Can you make ____ have mod privileges
I've tried asking people if they wanted admin privileges before since I'm not super active and they can make the frontpage nice and all and everyone ignored them. If I do I want to make sure it's not some autist like Tourneyanon getting that privilege or making obscene rules or banning people. This is supposed to be a very low-key wiki
No.11649
Anonymous
>>11642
> Still undecided, I think best case is mark both 2nd/3rd and make a note about the circumstance It's a very tough shell to crack because it's never been done before but you can input your thoughts
Shirley 3rd place with an asterisk or disqualified. 4th Nicole too, 5th Brisby as well.
1.)In every competition cheaters during or after are punished. They lose their awards. It’s common sense.
2.)It’s obvious the placement for Shirley is a troll from the samefag. Even the win image is halfassed.
3.)70 to 80% of anons voted to removed cheaters.
4.)I voted Chel and I’m fine she got second place. Rig fags have been trying to ape our name.
5.)Other wiki editors wanted to change the page to the correct girl. There’s 2 on the board saying they would.
6.)The wiki should match the tourney. It’s a record of the tourney. If we were going only by the poll Captain America would be the first Mr. /co/. It’s inconsistent to not follow that now.
7.)This >>11475

Overall I think wiki anons ignoring the ruling sets a bad precedent. The host had a vote for his rule, but the wiki guys just listened to samesfags. Which we all know is an awful idea from seeing Round 3 when NDA did it.
No.11650
Anonymous
Replies:>>11678
>>11649
The 11475 is just saying they have tried to make several excuses pretending to be several groups. None of them make sense.

If anything please just use basic rules etiquette or common sense.
Looking at Lance Armstrong(caught after lost all awards), Ben Johnson, Forsaken(caught during), the list goes on.
No.11653
Anonymous
>>11649
the precedent we should be setting here is “hosts can’t make up new rules and fuck with the results after the tournament is already over” and before you say hosts should remove cheaters or people voted to remove cheaters, no. hosts should remove votes they think are illegitimate, and people voted for hosts to silently remove illegitimate votes. that does not entail any of the bullshit NSA pulled.
The issue at play here, and also in the argument over Fang having an asterisk, is not about cheaters. It’s about NSA being a raging turbofaggot who overstepped his bounds.
No.11654
Anonymous
Replies:>>11666
>>11653
>Hosts shouldn’t remove cheaters
>>11642
This is the retarded argument from the rigging halfwit. If that isn’t the most obvious display of trolling I can’t make it simpler for you.
No.11655
Anonymous
>>11642
The winning image you used shows Shirley in 3rd with an asterix you might as well commit.
No.11666
Anonymous
Replies:>>11673
>>11654
you didn’t even read my post, fuck off
No.11667
Anonymous
>>11653
>hosts should remove votes they think are illegitimate, and people voted for hosts to silently remove illegitimate votes.
I agree that's the best solution, isn't that exactly what NightShift is going to do as for Mr. /co/?
No.11670
Anonymous
Replies:>>11673
>>11667
Maybe but mr /co/ never had rigging iirc except for the very first year with captain skrull, especially since everyone who participates is worthy of the title and not an aggressive waifu popularity contest.
No.11671
Anonymous
>>11572
This. Chel V Fang should have been the final round. Now we have a third placer that should be second or first place and a first placer that could conceivably been second place.
No.11673
Anonymous
Replies:>>11675
>>11666
NTP but you invalidated your argument the moment you said that.
>>11667
Yes. That anon didn't realize that one of the options in the poll was remove rigged votes without alerting anyone. But he also sounds like he's baiting.
>>11670
This. Ms. /co/ has strong autism running amuck.
No.11674
Anonymous
>>11642
I'm going to agree with the anon saying cheaters should be punished. Shirley should not have gotten there. Therefore she should not recieve the accolades. To give her third place knowing all we know is spitting in the face of sportsmanship.

I think saying Chel vs Fang could have resulted differently is the same as arguing Chel vs any of the other contestants she got to skip because of Tyrhanne could have resulted differently. All we can go on is what happened.
Chel "lost" to Shirley, and as unfair as the win was, Chel lost. Fang however beat Shirley.
No.11675
Anonymous
Replies:>>11679
>>11673
So, we can expect things to get better from now on? I mean this new rule is pretty much going to erase 50% of the drama if it's applied and no character gets their reputation tarnished. Only person I don't see applying because he's too ignorant it's Temp.
No.11678
Anonymous
>>11649
>>11650
post >>11475 was a joke btw
No.11679
Anonymous
Replies:>>11686
save file
image:166336294636.png(33kB , 500x1000 , c4081028cf1146abe07199ea839754617a847502.png)
>>11675
Hopefully. People will probably still accused characters of being rigged but that happens in every tournament. As long as hosts don't enter the threads and start talking about it, then we should be good. Only time something good came out of that was rumorposting in last year's King of /v/.
No.11686
Anonymous
Replies:>>11687
>>11679
Who’s hosting?
No.11687
Anonymous
>>11686
Don't know about Mr. /co/ but supposedly Queen and King of /v/ this year will be hosted by NightShiftAnon and LazyDayAnon, although we need to make sure LazyDay isn't just Tourney in disguise. What I want to know is if Geralt can enter this year seeing as the rule that was made to block him out doesn't even apply to him.
No.11690
Anonymous
Replies:>>11697
>>11687
I thought we didn't know who king/queen was being hosted by
I know mr./co/ is definitely nigthshift
No.11697
Anonymous
>>11690
They discussed it over in the /v/ hype thread here: >>9990
Here's their posts in question:
>>11130
>>11158
>>11160
>>11161
>>11163
>>11165
>>11168

Honestly I hope either Sheets or Macho Manon return this year to host because there will inevitably be drama with NightShift hosting unless Mr. /co/ helps improve his current reputation.
No.11700
Anonymous
>>11697
NightShiftAnon hosted last year too. I don’t think most people care as long as he does what he said he wanted to do. (Just delete rigged votes and stay quiet) I’m just glad Fernanon isn’t involved anymore. From what NightShiftAnon said, he just didn’t do anything except drama post. So it looks like he’s learning to not just trust anyone. I never understood why he let him help since Fern was always a self admitted shit head.

I saw he said he was building a host rotation now though. Maybe he plans on retiring by the end of the year? But so far he said he’s hosting all the tourneys this year, and the new host is in training until King /v/alhalla where he’ll take over.
No.11701
Anonymous
>>11697I'm more curious if he'll add the Grandfather rule since tournaments prior to 21 never needed one but with E&I and the new rule it'd probably need to be applied
No.11702
Anonymous
>>11700
I remember NightShift was there last year. He was fine, just posted results and didn't get involved in the threads until after the finals. I know nobody wants Dominos back after how he acted last year in both /v/ and Tag Team. Good thing Fern isn't coming back either, dude did nothing except make the situation worse. What happened to Ghost? He was silent throughout the whole tournament.
>>11701
Who would it apply to? I can only think of the guns and Geralt.
No.11703
Anonymous
>>11702
Ghost is NSA’s personal friend he got to help. Probably just asked him to post threads when he wasn’t there.
>>11700
I assumed he was desperate. Guy said he couldn’t even find a willing host for /v/. I don’t think he’s retiring unless we force him to. Something about passing the torch if he is still unfavorable by the end of the year.
No.11704
Anonymous
>>11687
>although we need to make sure LazyDay isn't just Tourney in disguise
>this lack of activity in the site
Oh no
No.11705
Anonymous
>>11701
The only rule I saw him add was the rig checking rule. /v/ and /co/ tourneys aren’t connected. I don’t think anyone wants the grandfather rule in.
No.11706
Anonymous
>>11704
NSA you better be clearing this guy well. You can’t afford another fuck up like this.
I’d like it if LazyDay spoke to us first. At least introduce yourself.
No.11707
Anonymous
Replies:>>11710
>>11704
NightShift said he is well aware of Tourney’s existence, maybe we don’t have much to worry about in the end.
No.11708
Anonymous
>>11702
Who’s idea was it to remove Geralt?
No.11709
Anonymous
I like nightshift's idea, we need more hosts that can jump in when needed rather than one host for everything
now that being said I've more tinfoil hate theories:
either lazyday is:
Tourney
or
Nightshift in disguise so he can dump one trip for another
No.11710
Anonymous
>>11707
But NSA said he never dealt with Tourney. He never joined the Tag Team shit show. I don’t even know what he did. Dominos apparently knowingly let him help.
No.11711
Anonymous
Replies:>>11712
>>11709
Lazy day and night butted heads when Lazy first showed up. Lazy created a rumor, apologized. Then offered to host /v/‘s tourney after.
I don’t think they’re the same guy, because NSA posted in Lazy’s thread.
No.11712
Anonymous
>>11711
I forgot to add.
He posted in his thread because NSA’s got pruned when his internet cut out. I can definitely see him as tourney though.
No.11713
Anonymous
>>11708
One of the hosts last year. NSA said he was just the sheets guy so I imagine Dominos? The head honcho host gets to veto characters from what Night said here
>>11697
No.11714
Anonymous
Replies:>>11723
>>11708
I can’t remember exactly, but I think it was brought up during nominations because some anons questioned the inclusion of AM and others responded with a justification along the lines of "if the original creator was involved in the vidya adaptation the character in question should be allowed in". Mind you, that was never applied as an actual rule and none of the hosts made a statement regarding it. I personally believe the real reason Geralt didn’t make it was because the hosts either forgot about it (bunch dumbasses) or had no previous context of who Geralt even was (bunch of dumbasses).
Whatever’s the case, both him and AM should be allowed to participate this year since they very much are synonymous with vidya.
No.11715
Anonymous
Replies:>>11716
>>11712
What did tourney do? Rig? Leave? Half ass?
No.11716
Anonymous
Replies:>>11718
>>11715
>he doesn’t know
No.11717
Anonymous
Replies:>>11789
>>11709
Putting my hat on now.
If nsa is looking for other hosts it makes no sense to make yourself the other host alt. Especially in a contest you don’t know. Lazy is just taking over /v/. Which nsa admitted he doesn’t browse enough to host well. He’d be shooting himself in the foot. Ruining two trips. I’d sooner believe Ghost is his alt.
Tourney would be the worst case scenario.
Dominos would be ehh. Coin flip.
Stats?
The original host?
No.11718
Anonymous
>>11716
Spoon feed me pls. Someone said he did what the current host did. But he sounds like the boogeyman from how everyone describes him here. He can’t be worse than the first host of Mr. /co/ right?
No.11719
Anonymous
>>11718
He rigged in tag team. Check the tag team wiki.
No.11723
Anonymous
save file
image:166344805539.jpg(17kB , 184x184 , mado shrug.jpg)
>>11702
>>11708
>>11714
Alright, I searched through the archives just in case and if we go according to this post by Dominos, both Geralt and AM should indeed be allowed to participate. Case closed.
https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/580590864/#q580597564
No.11727
Anonymous
>>11718
The tl;dr on TourneyAnon/Numnuts Anon/KawaiiSenpai/whatever the fuck he's called is that he's a massive faggot and attention whore who tries to take over tournaments every year so he can rig his favorite characters to win. He's also a RP fag who would try and refuse to let characters enter cause they wouldn't match his RP. Literally nobody wants him here except himself and the only reason why he hasn't been banned is because he's not breaking any rules.
>He can’t be worse than the first host of Mr. /co/ right?
He's worse. That guy at least admitted what he did was wrong and stepped down from hosting ever since. Tourney's ego is too massive to do that.
No.11789
Anonymous
Replies:>>11810
>>11687
>>11704
>>11709
>>11712
>>11717
It was fucking Tourney again
No.11792
Anonymous
save file
image:166354382533.jpg(242kB , 525x814 , CB311D45-C10B-4786-BBF1-9B308E494EEF.jpeg)
>Was denied entry into King /v/ because mods were retarded
No.11810
Anonymous
>>11789
Someone better pick up that phone. Because I fucking called it.