/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Due to the recent cyberattacks on 4chan, the boards are currently on Red Alert.
Stay vigilant.

Thread stats: 369 posts, 44 files (44 image(s))

Replying to /tnt/187517
Options
No.187517
Mr./Ms. /co/ Off-Season Discussion Thread #2Anonymous
Image:174241767955.png(1.11MB, 1280x720)frozensheriff.png
"Am I glad he's funposting in there and that we're out here!" edition
No.187519
Anonymous
Replies:>>187521
(Retroactively thread #15)
No.187521
Anonymous
>>187519
Even the tournament threads have legacy numbering, just like my comics
No.187522
Anonymous
Replies:>>187527
>/v/ is on thread 17
/co/bro’s…
No.187523
Anonymous
Mr./Ms. /co/ Off-Season Discussion Thread (Vol. 2) #2
No.187527
Anonymous
>>187522
/co/ all stars ruins yet another good thing
No.187529
Anonymous
Replies:>>187530
>>187517
Spear comeback when
No.187530
Anonymous
>>187529
>Genndy
Not until Jack is out of the equation, in which case he has to win and then be retired for several years.
No.187537
Anonymous
Predict champions for Ms /co/ and Mr /co/ 2025
No.187540
Anonymous
>>187517
Fuck you I wanted to name it thread #15 and use the chad Mr. /co/ E8 image.
No.187542
Anonymous
>>187537
Ms: Raven, Eris, Toph, Azula, Chel
Mr: Jack, Hank, Daffy, SpongeBob, Optimus

Less likely but still have a decent shot: Starfire, Wile E or Marvin, Batman, Superman, one of the Eds, Megatron or Starscream

Would be funny while still fitting /co/'s tastes: A Smiling Friends character, EVE
No.187543
Anonymous
Replies:>>187548
>>187505
>Who are the STRONGEST most DANGEROUS characters
That's not a thing in Mr. /co/, powerlevels are pretty flexible. Unless you're Monarch or Silver, then you're just fucked forever.

As for Ms., well, you could see how much /tnt/'s predictions of that are worth last year when people here were hyping up Brisby and Jessica Rabbit and one didn't qualify at all while the other maintained her position as an E8 gatekeeper.
No.187548
Anonymous
>>187543
Monarch was the closest to beating Daffy last year before Spider-Man, losing only by 20 votes, and it was the second closest of the round 2 results with Mojo Jojo and Superman only having an 18 vote difference. His wife might have won first, but he still shows promise.
No.187549
Anonymous
>>187537
watch the mr. winner be farquaad because god hates you all and your predictions
No.187550
Anonymous
>>187542
>Azula
I think we can dispense with taking her as a serious winner contender. Her place in (F)ARTS was always the weakest and she hasn’t got E8 since 2019. No campaigning either.
No.187551
Anonymous
Replies:>>187567
>>187542
>Eris
Tainted because of the NSA association.
>Azula
The FARTS no one liked.
>SpongeBob
I think the SpongeBob E8 fatigue will kick in.
>Prime
Most likely TF and the only one from there as a realizable winner, but I felt like he had a lucky Livesey-tier run in 2023 thanks to randomized brackets.
No.187552
Anonymous
Replies:>>187556
>>187542
I'm already betting against Eris, Spongebob, Batman, and Superman. Eris will have the NSA stigma. Anons have tried saying it won't be that bad because NSA chose Wuya in the end, but Ms. /co/ voters are petty. Spongebob has the same problem as Shake, where voters want their grumpy neighbors to win way more. Spongebob has made an elite eight unlike Shake, and I can see him making another one, but I don't see him winning before Squidward. I don't think Mr. /co/ anons are predictable enough to vote for the faces of DC to win right after voting for the face of Marvel to win.
No.187553
Anonymous
>>187549
Jokes on you, I'm hyped to drawfag for Farquaad again. God loves me. Amen.
No.187554
Anonymous
>>187549
If anything that's a more solid prediction for a Shrek character in light of the trailer reveal.
No.187556
Anonymous
>>187552
>I don't think Mr. /co/ anons are predictable enough to vote for the faces of DC to win right after voting for the face of Marvel to win.
i'd extend this to any DC or Marvel character. I think comic characters are going to do better in general going forward (so long as people keep the enthusiasm up) but it's too soon for Mr. to have another capeshit winner.
However, I wouldn't say the same about Ms., and I think Raven is in a good position to win this year. Knock on wood.
No.187557
Anonymous
I to this day don’t get Hank being overwhelmingly the strongest non-winner.
He’s fine, his show is alright in a subdued way but not a particular highlight of the era, his character personality is alright but isn’t that strong compared to the other heavies, he’s liked on /co/ but the presence of him isn’t as frequent as the CM shows. There really isn’t a reason I see why he’d be multitudes above every other contestant who hasn’t won, outside being maybe the show being the most subdued and mature of the ones with characters who have a shot
No.187558
Anonymous
>>187554
The trailer was universally panned so I think it hurts Shrek characters more than anything
No.187559
Anonymous
>>187554
>>187558
We don’t even know if Farquaad is going to return in that movie yet.
No.187560
Anonymous
>>187537
>>187505
Going off that statistical chart anon made the strongest returners would be:
>Chel, Raven, Starfire, Eris, EVE, Toph
>Hank, Jack, Grim, JJJ, Daffy, Aku, Shaggy
Taking into account meta debuffs JJJ could taken off. Chel, Starfire, Grim, and Shaggy do not feel like winners with their current silent obligatory powerjobber trajectory. They need an actual campaign started for them. If they got a sizeable vocal base then they're in good standing for a win.
I also still stand by Ms. having a strong favoritism for consistent midcards that don't bring much attention to themselves. They're the possible inoffensive under the radar winners that wouldn't be surprising for Ms. /co/ winners.
No.187561
Anonymous
>>187558
I hope Mr. /co/ wouldn't overreact like that. Shrek is unironically good.
No.187562
Anonymous
Replies:>>187563
>>187557
KotH is absolutely a highlight and Hank is one of the greatest western animated MC's ever.
No.187563
Anonymous
Replies:>>187565
>>187562
…in bizarro world
No.187565
Anonymous
>>187563
...which is our world.
No.187566
Anonymous
Replies:>>187585
>>187557
this guy did not understand King of the Hill
No.187567
Anonymous
>>187551
Optimus' run was definitely luck but he still had a good E8 showing and only lost to Zim by 10 votes. It put TF back in the spotlight as a series for Mr. /co/ considering three Decepticons qualified the following year. I think Optimus will still have good odds.
No.187573
Anonymous
Replies:>>187585
>>187557
It's called a cult following.
No.187575
Anonymous
Replies:>>187576
>>187560
>I also still stand by Ms. having a strong favoritism for consistent midcards that don't bring much attention to themselves. They're the possible inoffensive under the radar winners that wouldn't be surprising for Ms. /co/ winners.
I sure hope that era of underwhelming winners is behind us now.
No.187576
Anonymous
Replies:>>187577
>>187575
It is neither behind Ms or Mr
No.187577
Anonymous
>>187576
Projecting /v/ro...
No.187585
Anonymous
>>187566
>>187573
If he was so liked people would not try to make him the new Geralt
No.187586
Anonymous
Replies:>>187587
>>187585
Hank actually got three E8s on main unlike that fraud.
No.187587
Anonymous
Replies:>>187589
>>187586
On easy matchups
No.187589
Anonymous
Replies:>>187590
Image:174250631249.jpg(14kB, 300x301)baint.jpg
>>187585
>>187587
No.187590
Anonymous
>>187589
It's a well known fact these things are rigged
No.187591
Anonymous
Replies:>>187595
If Hank is a lucky jobber then there are literally no powerhouses anywhere because they can all be called that.
No.187592
Anonymous
Replies:>>187593
Stop humoring the baiter.
No.187593
Anonymous
>>187592
Unironically this.
No.187595
Anonymous
Replies:>>187596
Image:174251115367.jpg(104kB, 2208x1242)IMG_6112.jpeg
>>187591
And when everyone is a lucky jobber, no one will be.
No.187596
Anonymous
>>187595
Oswald...
No.187604
Anonymous
>>187560
Sexiness IS a character campaign. If that's not good enough for you then these characters are too good for this tournament.
No.187614
Anonymous
Replies:>>187617
>>187604
New level of cope unlocked
No.187615
Anonymous
>>187604
There are thousands of /co/ girls that can be considered sexy.
No.187617
Anonymous
Replies:>>187621
>>187614
From the minds that brought you "coomers are being discriminated against" comes...
No.187618
Anonymous
Replies:>>187619
Stop giving the obvious troll replies /tnt/...
No.187619
Anonymous
No.187621
Anonymous
>>187617
NTA but they are. As someone who doesn't want a blatant coompick like Bellum to win, you can't say traditional hot characters aren't getting shit simply for being hot and therefore inherently boring. This happens in both Ms. and Queen.
No.187625
Anonymous
>>187621
There's a reason EVE and Amaterasu get so highly regarded; it's too torture other people
No.187626
Anonymous
Image:174257902219.jpg(118kB, 627x477)bait.jpg
No.187627
Anonymous
>>187621
>As someone who doesn't want a blatant coompick like Bellum to win
You are literally part of the problem
No.187629
Anonymous
How do we reconcile the anti coomer stigma with the fact that Frankie won last year? Does her campaign make her an evil campooner pick?
No.187631
Anonymous
Replies:>>187632
Hot women characters do have a natural advantage. The anti coomer thing really only shows in OC output and some vocal complaining. Tourneyheads, cause they find standard coom boring or cause degenerate autists specifically are drawn to "tourney culture" have created an odd world where hot women get no porn and all sorts of gay stuff, furries, and even loli's get content instead, even in the porn tourneys. It's an odd ass backwards time being a normal goonfag in tourneys.
No.187632
Anonymous
Replies:>>187633
>>187631
Also the only normal hot women porn I can even remember the last several months being drawn tourney related was that Hexfag drawpile thing a week ago (granted the actual porn was of a pokemon, Hex just was very suggestive) and that caused a bunch shitflinging her for some reason.
No.187633
Anonymous
>>187632
I think the shitflinging was because Hex was being praised as a coom pick while characters like Tifa and 2B were lambasted and falseflagged for being coom, creating a bit of a double standard.
No.187635
Anonymous
Replies:>>187660
>>187633
No one praises Hex for being a coompick. It was cause people don't like Hexfag specifically.
No.187636
Anonymous
>>187621
>Queen
/v/ is lolicons, not anticoomers. They're not being funny or ironic when they vote in younger girl characters.
No.187637
Anonymous
What actually wold be the reception if one of the powerhouse straight coom icons like Raven, Chel, 2B, or Tifa got a lewd campaign in the main tourneys? I know there'd be some complaints here but could that actually give them a win in the main tourney? I know there's speculation Hex could've won if the drawfag just went lewd with it.
No.187638
Anonymous
>>187637
I would understand it and 2B would benefit from any genuine campaign
anyway why was Recette the only winner with a lewd campaign besides the obvious?
No.187641
Anonymous
Replies:>>187652
>>187638
The trouble with giving 2B any sort of genuine campaign is that she is secondary fans: The Character.
No.187642
Anonymous
Replies:>>187645
>>187638
>Recette the only winner with a lewd campaign
Wasn't it a perfectly wholesome campaign during the tournament, aerd was just a degenerate outside of that?
No.187643
Anonymous
Replies:>>187648
Image:174258386787.jpg(53kB, 700x473)1699847163375649.jpg
from my experience the outcry against prime "sexy" candidates had more to do with the "baby's first boner" archetype. characters old enough to have been the sexual awakening of the average 4chan user. you vote for someone just because they're sexy, that's whatever. they're probably not going to get far. but it's that extra dollop of nostalgia that leads to a massive overestimation of value.
also /co/ is a blue board. so when porn is all a character has going for them, there's not a lot to talk about. so now you've got the silentfag debate rolled in as well. that's a far bigger issue. active sex-focused campaigns are received positively, same as any other campaign.

tl;dr /co/ doesn't care if something is carried by sex appeal unless it turns into silent- or nostalgia-fagging
No.187645
Anonymous
>>187642
it was wholesome for the first couple of rounds
No.187646
Anonymous
Replies:>>187659
Image:174258403155.png(265kB, 802x750)1726707382352243.png
>/co/ thread starts getting activity
>/v/tards immediately inject their dumbass drama into it
No.187647
Anonymous
What if I actually do find Fang attractive and voted with my pp, what does that make me?
No.187648
Anonymous
Replies:>>187655
>>187643
While I agree with the observation, the ground of meta arguments in general kind of comes from the counterpoint to this sentiment, being that if that's what the board is naturally inclined towards then it's fine that's what characters get voted on.
Coom debating in general seems wrapped up in the larger debate about more "interesting" and active picks and purposes of voting.
No.187649
Anonymous
>>187647
a nigger
No.187650
Anonymous
No.187651
Anonymous
>>187647
A bird probably
No.187652
Anonymous
Replies:>>187653
>>187641
So is Hex and that worked out well for her
No.187653
Anonymous
Replies:>>187654
>>187652
The "genuine campaign" for her was literally one guy making up a whole different character.
No.187654
Anonymous
>>187653
what character?
No.187655
Anonymous
>>187648
Adding a layer to this is the fact you got coom posting and OC for just about everything other than standard popular sexy girls. The designated female porn tourney now (or at least it was intended to be) basically punts all these picks from even qualifying.
No.187657
Anonymous
Replies:>>187658
>>187637
>>187638
Considering the backlash humanoid Amaterasu got in 2023, I don't think people would be that understanding
No.187658
Anonymous
>>187657
>humanoid Amaterasu
I don't think that's a good comparison...
No.187659
Anonymous
>>187646
Today is /cov/ so I guess things are extra retarded
No.187660
Anonymous
>>187633
That's just the normal round 3-4 /QoV/. Hexfag just made the mistake of addresing the shitflingers.
>>187635
Imagine hating on OC. Oh wait, this is /co/. Go on.
No.187661
Anonymous
>>187660
Why does /co/ hate OC so much?
No.187662
Anonymous
Replies:>>187670
https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/Spider-Man/Gallery
What are all these art pics and videos doing here, /v/ told me /co/ was silent and hated OC!
No.187663
Anonymous
>>187660
>That's just the normal round 3-4 /QoV/
It has never gotten that shit before. Even 2023 was fine until the crown steal shit came up.
No.187666
Anonymous
>>187660
It's not hating on OC. Again, it's hating on hexfag specifically, even the shit about off-season OC being bad felt like it was made up just to attack him. Personally I don't care if he's making some coom art for a coom character. It does get annoying when he gets his character pushed for shelling out a bunch of completely unrelated quirky avatarfagging in the main tourney though.
No.187667
Anonymous
>>187666
Why does /co/ hate off season OC so much?
No.187668
Anonymous
>>187666
>It does get annoying when he gets his character pushed for shelling out a bunch of completely unrelated quirky avatarfagging in the main tourney though.
Totally okay when the Decepticons and the Monarch do it however.
No.187670
Anonymous
>>187662
>>187666
stop feeding the troll
No.187671
Anonymous
Replies:>>187676
This was never an OC competition, the OC was just supposed to help the characters do well and liven up the threads. The fact that people take attacks on OC and artists so personally shows how far we are from the original point of these things.
No.187676
Anonymous
>>187671
i dunno dude, i don't think it's a good idea to constantly insult the people who put the most effort into tournaments or shit-talk the characters they support
the fact that most of the widely beloved OC creators, like Psyanon or the boxing artist, avoid supporting any specific characters is an omen of deeper problems.
No.187679
Anonymous
>>187676
>avoid supporting any specific characters is an omen of deeper problems.
I don't see how that of all things is an open. They just want to participate and have fun without backing anyone character.
No.187680
Anonymous
Replies:>>187688
>>187676
>i dunno dude, i don't think it's a good idea to constantly insult the people who put the most effort into tournaments or shit-talk the characters they support
Why is it that insutling Hexfag is somehow insulting all artists and contributors? People shit on Pencilfag and it's never seen as sign of hating all OC.
No.187682
Anonymous
If anything I think it's more telling that admitted campaigners (NSA, E8fag, Hexfag, that one waifufag who flooded a Smiling Friends thread) have all caused grief in the threads, either directly or indirectly.
No.187688
Anonymous
Replies:>>187690
>>187680
the constant vitriol towards hexfag is indicative of a broader culture where the work of artists is only respected if they draw for the right characters, those of course being the ones you already like
No.187689
Anonymous
Hexfag wasn't even seriously slandered by anyone up until the Baiken round incident. What the hell is up with all the weird revisionism that's been popping up about him as of late.
No.187690
Anonymous
Replies:>>187703
>>187688
I thought it was because Hex Manaic literally isn't a character and is just a cypher for the artist. It's such an odd situation I don't think you can take it as indicative of all other artists.
No.187693
Anonymous
Replies:>>187696
>>187689
We need to protect our artists from /co/.
No.187694
Anonymous
Replies:>>187696
>>187689
Hexfag isn't even relevant to /co/, I don't know why people keep pushing that shit here.
No.187696
Anonymous
>>187694
Trolls baiting, see >>187693
No.187698
Anonymous
>>187689
They were definitely getting shit for being an ooc bad character campaign. Particalarly after beating Maya. Did you not see all the controversy during the Zelda round?
No.187699
Anonymous
>>187698
The BBC posting and the King Piccolo avatarfag didn't exactly help.
No.187700
Anonymous
do not respond to /v/fags
ignore them and eventually they will go back to their own thread
No.187702
Anonymous
Replies:>>187705
>>187698
The contestant has always been shat on for a variety of reasons but the artists themselves wasn't subject of controversy until more recently.
No.187703
Anonymous
>>187690
Yes, Hexfag is a unique case, there isn't really a comparison anywhere else. Besides the usual stuff about campaign vs. popuarity or whatever there's the fact the character in question is literally not an actual character and the campaign is based off a guys original interpretation that isn't accurate even to the usual fan gooner approach.
No.187705
Anonymous
>>187702
The artists started getting shat on a lot R3 last year, then way more R4 onward. The idea that the Baiken stuff was the first part of it is just how people that were neutral or liked him started to turn on him too.
No.187771
Anonymous
>>187698
Who wasn't getting shit on those rounds?
No.188033
Anonymous
Replies:>>188048
Image:174267654948.jpg(1,021kB, 1179x874)IMG_9808.jpeg
New jobber dropped
No.188048
Anonymous
>>188033
New Elite 8 dropped
No.189174
Psyanon !umpn/.DAgw
Image:174286924724.png(3.52MB, 2000x964)4N.png
>>187676
Being impartial about the contestants has always been integral to my shows. I don't do it out of any kind of fear, it's just what the listeners have come to expect from me. If I take distinct sides, it would seem like I'm punching down on whoever they're up against, and punching down is the worst form of comedy. I can understand your feelings that some content creators feel pressured to not express their own personal likes and dislikes and thus hamstring their creativity, but know that, for some of us, neutrality is what allows us the most creative freedom, rather than stifles it.

Truth be told? The only 'advantage' a character may have is if I've played their game or watched their show, and not done so for the other character, if for no other reason than my gags might not be as witty as I'd like them to be. You have no idea how many wikis I have to have up during tournament season to learn about obscure characters, /v/ or /co/, in order to attempt to make an appreciable joke that isn't just making fun of their physical appearance or the like.
No.189230
Anonymous
Imagine the shitstorm if Looney Tunes gets announced as sold to another company slightly before or during Mr /co/
No.189240
Anonymous
Replies:>>189242
>>189230
Honestly, I'm not entirely sure I believe the rumors since that would fuck everything even beyond Zaslav's pale. But at least people can't call Daffy a WB winner now.
No.189242
Anonymous
Replies:>>189243
>>189240
>Disney buys Warner’s remains
>They are now retroactive Disney winners
No.189243
Anonymous
>>189242
Didn't work for Grievous and Spider-Man
No.189289
Anonymous
lol augie's having a meltdown and begging to be permanently banned
No.190021
Anonymous
Image:174304353036.jpg(56kB, 514x432)1567603638551.jpg
With Pepe the Frog having unfortunately fallen short of expectations the last couple editions of Mr. /co/, I was wondering, which boards have the highest concentration of frogposters? I know /tv/ and /int/ have frog threads up pretty much constantly
Maybe with their support Pepe could make it big like in previous years
No.190039
Anonymous
Replies:>>190067
>>190021
Well now that's a pretty self-explanatory answer. Which competition last year did frogs rank as the 2nd highest seed?
No.190062
Anonymous
Replies:>>190093
>>189289
Really? Lol, I'd love it to see it
No.190064
Anonymous
>>190021
Posting frogs should be an immediate ban.
No.190067
Anonymous
>>190039
That's actually a good point. Aren't Frogs like THE /an/imal?
No.190085
Anonymous
Replies:>>190093
>>189289
Where?
No.190093
Anonymous
>>190062
>>190085
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/148049184/#148049184
It was actually Birchy, Augie was just mentioned. Guess this means we won't see him around the /co/ tournaments.
No.190097
Anonymous
No.190112
Anonymous
>>190093
>It was actually Birchy, Augie was just mentioned.
they're the same person
No.190122
Anonymous
Much more tournament related
>someone brought Johanna winning Ms. in a mom thread
>out of nowhere someone starts shitting on Spider-Man and accuses his supporters of self inserting to fuck Frankie
>someone links a Twitter of some obese autist and goes "This is how his fans really are
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/148064779/#148065260
I think we've cracked the mystery of who's been shitting on Spider-Man
No.190157
Anonymous
>>190122
How in the fuck does Spider-Man of all characters make someone seethe this much.
No.190159
Anonymous
>>190157
Being THE STRONGEST isn’t always easy
No.190160
Anonymous
>>190157
To be fair it's in-character for him to be hated.
No.190209
Anonymous
Replies:>>190299
>>190122
This is somewhat ironical too cause Hildafags have gotta be the most pompous wanker cartoonfags on the boards. Had Johanna won you'd probably be seeing them bragging smugly about it to this day.
No.190299
Anonymous
>>190209
It's very strange how certain things attract certain types of people to the point where it influences the way their fandom is
No.190968
Anonymous
>>189230
Yeah, like those old rumors of DC Comics being sold? Forget it, the Warner’s will never sell off their very own mascot characters, that would be equivalent of Disney retiring Mickey Mouse as the face of the company
No.190992
Anonymous
Image:174320433620.gif(156kB, 640x474)IMG_5276.gif
>>190093
If you start seeing spam of various obscure Eastern European characters this coming tourney, it’s a red flag he didn’t actually leave. The website is much harder to leave than one thinks, look at famicom. He once claimed that he was officially done posting on that website and he was spotted quite recently on /a/‘s animejapan thread again spewing out his fan fiction lies over the industry all over his obsession on animaniac’s, I’m very much expecting Augie to be present this year, no one’s ever really gone
No.191007
Anonymous
>>190992
>obscure Eastern European characters
That's Augie, not Birchy
Brush up on your poopdickschizo lore
No.191128
Anonymous
Image:174321423275.jpg(18kB, 500x331)1551223159280.jpg
>/hsg/ is back
So, what are the chances a homestuck rep makes it in this year?
No.191134
Anonymous
Replies:>>191146
>>191128
0%
Generals get deleted and will at one point, and if an active thread was the sole criteria then Arcane and Primos would have qualified characters
No.191135
Anonymous
>>191128
Mods are really getting desperate to raise board activity.
No.191138
Anonymous
>>191007
>That's Augie, not Birchy
they're the same person
No.191146
Anonymous
Image:174321870467.jpg(38kB, 640x640)1559505480425.jpg
>>191134
>Arcane (Series based on /v/idya)
>Primos ("Not taken seriously" the show)
No.191149
Anonymous
>>191146
Wasn't Arcane allowed for /co/ tournaments?
No.191152
Anonymous
Replies:>>191170
>>191149
Normally no, they are /v/ original characters and have debuted on /v/ first and foremost. Secondly, /co/ only has a grandfather clause and no other rule about non-/co/ entries.
No.191153
Anonymous
>>191149
I think they were in qualifiers. None qualified though.
No.191163
Anonymous
I think a Homestuck character should win either Ms or Mr
No.191170
Anonymous
>>191152
One of the hosts said they're cleared for /co/ tournaments
No.191181
Anonymous
Replies:>>191183
Image:174323135838.png(28kB, 620x283)surrender yourself to kanaya.png
>>191128
It's been… uh, how many years?
No.191183
Anonymous
>>191181
I still am angry at the nigger mods for nuking the Bluey threads off of /co/
No.191184
Anonymous
Replies:>>191199
And it’s dead again
Would have been a sweet FOTM if this happened during /co/ qualifiers
No.191186
Anonymous
Image:174325186528.png(3.97MB, 2093x2232)ruby-redraw-v0-w1ikchnjwmfb1.png
>they thought they could escape /trash/
No.191188
Anonymous
Replies:>>191200
Image:174325591844.jpg(85kB, 756x876)hey g would you make me a sandwich.jpg
>>191163
but which one?
No.191199
Anonymous
>>191184
How is that flavor of the month? Generals don't help in tournaments
No.191200
Anonymous
Replies:>>191261
>>191163
>>191188
Which would cause more salt?
No.191201
Anonymous
>>191146
Then consider Wazzo Wednesday and Sari Sunday on /co/ or the Snoot and Hazbin generals on /trash/.
People prefer sticking to their generals than voting in tournaments.
No.191261
Anonymous
Replies:>>191272
Image:174328740911.png(226kB, 800x922)6aa3235f-a338-485c-b05f-b3305c10ab6f.png
>>191200
In general, for those with only a cursory knowledge of Homestuck? Probably no one in particular; the virtue of a Homestuck character winning is enough to piss a remarkable amount of people off.

For fans of the thing? Vriska, Jane, Calliope, or any Beforus troll that is -not- Aranea would be pretty harrowing outcomes, but patently impossible even in a hypothetical where HS characters do qualify because they barely have any fanbase to speak of on 4chan.

With that being said, Homestuck has its fair share of good characters that would fit right in with the kind of humor and posting tourneyheads enjoy: Doc Scratch, Caliborn, Terezi, Equius, Jack Noir/Spades Slick and the Midnight Crew as a whole, just to name a few.
No.191272
Anonymous
Replies:>>191311
>>191261
Oh right, some guy keeps campaigning for Terezi in qualifiers every year in Ms.
No.191297
Anonymous
Replies:>>191300
I’ve watched some gameplay of the new Ena game o it of curiosity, and I gotta say: this is what /co/ likes?
No.191300
Anonymous
Replies:>>191310
>>191297
It's based on surreal walking simulators that /v/ likes though.
No.191310
Anonymous
>>191300
I meant more of the style of humor and the character of Ena herself.
No.191311
Anonymous
Image:174328994551.jpg(70kB, 800x450)17493942803558.jpg
>>191272
No.191633
Anonymous
>>190992
>>191007
>>191146
And to the surprise of no one, he's back to posting long after his meltdown and begging to be banned
No.192028
Anonymous
Coyote Vs Acme is being released in 2026 after another distributor bought it
No.192029
Anonymous
>>192028
Wouldn't it be funny if Marvin cucked Wile E out of a slot this year as payback for last year?
No.192030
Anonymous
>>192029
If Farmer Jim doesn't make at least E8 of Mr. /co/, I will be so disappointed
No.192032
Anonymous
Replies:>>192033
Fucking hell, the aliens here here
No.192033
Anonymous
>>192032
Marvin’s campaign is starting early I see
No.192037
Anonymous
>>192029
There’s an extra slot this year for the franchise due to Bugs’ E8 spot, which means outside some freak event or a Porky resurgence due to his film both will qualify this year
But do you know what would be funny? Marvin gets cucked out of a spot by Wile in 2026 which continues his alternating qualifying and not qualifying streak
No.192073
Anonymous
>>192028
And the rumors of LT being sold are ramping up higher before
No.192103
Anonymous
>Pony board shut down and now on /co/
Ponies are now eligible for /co/ tournaments
No.192104
Anonymous
>/co/ is losing to /mlp/ again
Feels good being a vidyaCHAD
No.192108
Anonymous
Replies:>>192109
This year’s April fools is much better than the one on the main site, ACK ACK
No.192109
Anonymous
>>192108
>This year’s April fools is much better than the one on the main site, ACK ACK
The Red Alert one last year was also better.
No.192110
Anonymous
Image:174351492117.jpg(105kB, 660x470)IMG_6831.jpeg
No.192111
Anonymous
Replies:>>192115
/co/ has fallen.
No.192112
Anonymous
Sorry bros Mr and Ms /co/ are cancelled forever
It is now Mr and Ms /tnt/
No.192115
Anonymous
>>192111
Didn’t even make it to noon
No.192119
Anonymous
>the mods' idea for April Fools is to gradually get rid of every board that isn't /b/ or /pol/
Real subtle.
No.192157
Anonymous
Image:174355535979.jpg(345kB, 1059x1492)Sweet Art and Hella Style.jpg
the most remarkable part of this whole event is that there's consistently been a homestuck thread up all day
No.192158
Anonymous
Ms. /martian/ when
No.192159
Anonymous
I'm so sick of the garbage main site april fools, I want discussion that isn't porn
No.192175
Anonymous
>Looney Tunes didn't get sold off
>Instead WB is developing a theatrical, full length Looney Tunes movie, along with Flintstones and Tom & Jerry
Warner is not fucking around after Spider-Man won.
No.192284
Anonymous
Image:174378818342.jpg(83kB, 1152x864)sqkjlgdr.jpg
>5 months until Ms. /co/
No.192384
Anonymous
Image:174389897747.png(289kB, 445x503)1444018279039.png
>TDTEBW will be forgotten by the time Mr. & Ms. /co/ arrive
No.192385
Anonymous
>>192384
Good, that means Daffy won't have a coom campaign.
No.192386
Anonymous
>>192385
Shut up fag.
No.192388
Anonymous
>>192384
It was kind of already forgotten the moment people got their live action hybrid.
No.192409
Anonymous
Replies:>>192424
Image:174397433228.png(42kB, 495x495)I love dersites.png
>decide to give Homestuck a reread for potential tournament shenanigans
>turns out the site has been down for more than one whole fucking month
What is the cuck known as Andrew Hussie even doing now.
No.192424
Anonymous
>>192409
it probably won't happen since the moderators kind of nipped any buds for it back during it's prime, but will the recent Homestuck resurgence on /co/ play any role in the tournaments this year?
No.192426
Anonymous
>>192424
Maybe next 128
No.192439
Anonymous
>>192385
He’s never had one though
Do people actually coom after Daffy? He had a seed in the 20s for Playboy but can’t tell if it was just for brand name and being the most prominent animal character in /co/ tournaments
No.192448
Anonymous
Replies:>>192492
Image:174404693159.png(1.61MB, 1000x1000)Bargaining_with_the_Beast_track_image.png
>>192424
>the moderators kind of nipped any buds for it back during it's prime
I know what you're trying to say, but that's just not what happened. Homestuck's prime dates all the way back to 2011, by the time the general was banned on /co/ the project was already way, way past its expiration date, and becoming a taboo topic was a consequence of that with the fandom around it growing despodent and bored.
With that being said, the point is that you can't really deny the impact Homestuck had on /co/ and 4chan in general. MS Paint Adventures has around 5 or 6 rotating banners for fuck's sake.
No.192467
Anonymous
Replies:>>192476
>Homestuck
Literally who?
No.192476
Anonymous
Image:174407051373.jpg(592kB, 800x1068)1734932294203.jpg
>>192467
Not knowing what Homestuck is is the mark of a post-2016 election newfag although Homestuck does deserve to be forgotten.
No.192492
Anonymous
>>192448
Homestuck should have won instead of Johnny Bravo as the inaugural winner
No.192533
Anonymous
What did he mean by this?
>>192532
No.192535
Anonymous
Replies:>>192538
>>192533
It appears that vexus is starting her campaign real early, not only is she off by several months and almost two seasons, she posted in the wrong thread lol
No.192538
Anonymous
>>192535
Mindbroken by Jenny champ.
No.192733
Anonymous
>>192533
Tifffrens we can't stop winning
No.192796
Anonymous
Replies:>>192797
Image:174466370552.jpg(40kB, 1039x773)IMG_9892.jpeg
I promised during cov that I’d post it, here’s the completed 3D model of Fang, it’s being printed right now
No.192797
Anonymous
Replies:>>192799
Image:174466872937.png(22kB, 500x450)HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HAVE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUITS IN OH MY GOD THAT FEELS SO GOOD MORE MORE.png
>>192796
anon delivers
No.192799
Anonymous
Image:174467293052.jpg(509kB, 1179x776)IMG_9916.jpeg
>>192797
Speaking of, I just got a message that she’s done printing. I got her at 15 inches long.
No.192836
Anonymous
Replies:>>192861
>4chan died before the EE8 can happen
Pottery
No.192857
Anonymous
Replies:>>192858
Remember that crazy hypothetical people had about what would happen if 4chan died and Plus4chan had to pick up the refugees and become the new main site?
No.192858
Anonymous
>>192857
The servers would just explode from the traffic
No.192861
Anonymous
>>192836
4chan has been hacked before. Remember Moot and the Australian? I think it'll recover.
No.192862
Anonymous
Image:174469882723.png(107kB, 348x291)WHERE.png
WHERE'S 4CHAN, BLACK HAND!
No.192863
Anonymous
Hey, I got a task for you fuckers
See if jannies have talked about the tournaments on /j/
https://litter.catbox.moe/l41yyz.7z
>The hell is this
This catbox contains every thread ever posted on /j/, the hidden board for jannies
No.192864
Anonymous
Replies:>>192868
>>192863
>How the fuck did you get this
Someone on the sharty managed to hack into 4chan itself and is leaking a bunch of shit, including janny emails, code, and the /j/ board.
No.192865
Anonymous
>>192863
virus do not click
No.192866
Anonymous
Replies:>>192868
>>192865
WTF i just clicked and now my computer emits mustard ga
No.192867
Anonymous
Replies:>>192873
>>192863
im not downloading a zip file from some sharty teen hacker lmao
No.192868
Anonymous
Image:174469983106.png(120kB, 400x400)38d.png
>>192864
>>192865
>>192866
Sweet mother of christ, imagine the fucking blast /dbs/fags must be having right now. They spent YEARS of their lives torturing the mods from /a/ even managing to make one GIVE UP on duty through samefagging and routerfagging
No.192869
Anonymous
>the last thing posted on 4chan was chicken jockey
I hate this world sometimes
No.192870
Anonymous
And to think just early today, a gameplay-focused Mad Rat Dead thread reached bump limit on /v/ and peacefully archived. Knew it was too good to be true
>>192869
Lmao, proof?
No.192871
Anonymous
Replies:>>192896
>>192863
Oh god, imagine the nuclear fallout if they rigged a controversial winner like Shadow or Grimm for some personal agenda they had. The NSA stuff would be a blip on a radar compared to the explosion of rage.
No.192872
Anonymous
Replies:>>192879
>the source code got leaked
No.192873
Anonymous
>>192867
Same, what the hell is stuffed in that thing? A computer-bricking virus would be one of the good outcomes, imagine if it was something that fucked my whole network, or was illegal shit
No.192874
Anonymous
Replies:>>192879
You guys think it’s gonna take more than a week for the site to unfuck itself now that the source code got leaked?
No.192875
Anonymous
Replies:>>192876
Image:174470111499.gif(1.16MB, 320x310)1743656280467882.gif
Isn't Doxxing people pretty patently illegal?
I'm amazed someone hasn't sued the sharty into oblivion, it sounds like the most cut-and-dry case of promoting Doxxing with malicious intent. On 4chan just an accidental selfie usually gets pruned pretty fast, only Cabinbro and his ban evasion really gets away with it
No.192876
Anonymous
>>192875
If this ends with 4chan death along with sharty being sued into oblivion I will actually celebrate
No.192877
Anonymous
Image:174470127323.jpg(27kB, 540x504)Starscream_face.jpg
Lord Megatron! Soundwave managed to leak precious information about 4chan staff and it reveals they have been sucking off Prime and the autobots under our noses!
No.192879
Anonymous
Image:174470153780.png(266kB, 528x529)yang almost concerned.png
>>192872
>>192874
No.192896
Anonymous
Replies:>>192951
>>192863
If somebody actually wants to help me out with it, just go here.
https://bvll.neocities.org/j/
https://bvll.neocities.org/j/
https://bvll.neocities.org/j/
https://bvll.neocities.org/j/
>>192871
Doubt there's anything of interest to be found anyway, that sort of stuff would go directly to their Discord server.
No.192900
Anonymous
Replies:>>193676
Image:174471021549.png(60kB, 1543x305)1744699096457-1.png
Also, for those curious
>last time they talked about /hsg/ or Homestuck was almost 11 years ago
>in spite of pic related, it's still a banned topic on all boards except /aco/
No.192923
Anonymous
>>192869
The king /v/ deserves
No.192951
Anonymous
>>192896
>bvll
Somehow I knew Industrycuck was wrapped up in all this
No.193049
Anonymous
Replies:>>193331
Damn you Eris!
No.193150
Anonymous
Replies:>>193153
>4chan dies before the Eds, the Ducks, or Jessica Rabbit could make an Elite 8
No.193153
Anonymous
>>193150
>DC will never get a win since Bane is all but guaranteed to crash the /tv/ tournament with no survivors
No.193199
Anonymous
Replies:>>193262
Are the rumors about that one mod who hates fat threads because he got dumped by a fat chick true?
No.193262
Anonymous
>>193199
It might as well be.
No.193270
Anonymous
I still want Fang’s tyrannosaurus ass on my face
No.193273
Anonymous
welp, the people who wanted this year to be the end got their wish
No.193290
Anonymous
The last canon year...
No.193291
Anonymous
Frankiechuds got their wish and wanted to be the only FARTS member to win.
No.193293
Anonymous
Not canon if it’s not hosted on 4chan btw
No.193331
Anonymous
>>193049
Thank Goddess she sent her minions to destroy 4channel once and for all.
No.193535
Anonymous
Image:174478595465.png(124kB, 1834x126)perispammer source coude.png
he was... a hero?
No.193553
Anonymous
Replies:>>193558
Image:174479070478.gif(457kB, 180x166)1740885075460.gif
List of /co/ jannies
>bluemug, Conan, Corinne, Daze, jfaxdora, PurpWal, SquishyGlobe
Things of note to point out is that to the exception of two, most of these janny at least another board, with there being significant overlap with /vp/. Conan in particular appears to be some Filipino Tiktok kid who is also a /mlp/ and /hm/ janny.
No.193558
Anonymous
>>193553
I wonder which one is Industrycuck.
No.193673
Anonymous
Genndy's Fixed is actually being released and comes out August 13th
This means characters from this film will be eligible for Mr /co/ this year
https://www.animationmagazine.net/2025/04/first-look-netflix-rescues-genndy-tartakovskys-fixed-from-the-dog-house/
No.193675
Anonymous
>>193673
It was supposed to be Ketchup!!!
No.193676
Anonymous
>>192900
Actually HSG was effectively unbanned this year.
No.193680
Anonymous
>>193673
Genndy comedy cartoons never do as well as his action cartoons. It will be a miracle if it even qualifies.
No.193690
Anonymous
>>193673
I'll laugh if this fucking nut dog managed to qualify before any Unicorn: Warriors Eternal character.
No.193691
Anonymous
>>193690
>Dog balls gets farther than Dexter himself
No.193692
Anonymous
>>193690
I watched throug Unicorn and it was just really bland and lame. I was active in the /co/ threads, I only remember the furrylust for Fox Lady, and that drawing of Edred farting
No.193706
Anonymous
>>193673
Literally everyone I’ve seen talk about this movie on /co/ says that it looks a massive waste of talent on Genndy’s party, no one likes this movie and I doubt any of the characters will get enough votes to make it past the bottom 128 let alone come close to qualifying for the top 128.
No.193740
Anonymous
>>193673
>animation fandom finds out about this
>make it about Zaslav and WB, pivot all discussion to getting Batgirl and Scoob 2 getting released, need to be reminded that this was made by Sony Pictures

>movieheads find out about this
>Talk about Genndy's career in full, complement the art style, draw parallels to films like Fritz the Cat

Really makes you think.
No.193817
Anonymous
Replies:>>193839
>>187517
Do any homestuck characters stand a chance at getting E8 or at least getting in this time?
No.193818
Anonymous
Replies:>>193841
Do you guys think any Downtown reps could make it? Before the happening, we've been getting quite a few threads about it.
>By ONE (1) guy)
Probably, but nonetheless they've been successful threads and more people have checked the show out as a result and liked it. Honestly, Alex and Jen have a rather 4channy feel to them so I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet.
No.193839
Anonymous
Replies:>>193878
>>193817
Why do people here keep hyping up Homestuck? Unless it gets new material it's not making it far. Especially considering it's polarizing at best.
No.193841
Anonymous
>>193818
It's a cult classic cartoon when /co/ usually favors more accessible shows so it's not surprising that it hasn't happened yet. I don't know where people are getting this idea that having one active thread would suddenly increase their chances in the tournaments.
No.193849
Anonymous
If the question is if a niche/obscure property’s character that is not brand new will make the final roster, the answer is always you should have nominated them in 2018 when you had the chance
No.193872
Anonymous
>>187517
Hey, I know there's a rule for characters that are technically different versions of the same character, but I dunno if that should apply to everyone.
Like, Supergirl and Power Girl are technically the same person, but they're quite different from each other.
However, one clearly wouldn't consider Golden Age Superman (Kal-L) different enough from Silver Age Superman (Kal-El).
Guess all I'm trying to say is that some alternate versions of characters should be counted separately.
Yes, this is because I want to nominate Batman Who Laughs as his own separate character instead of just Batman, I think he's different enough.
No.193878
Anonymous
>>193839
>unless it's getting now material
It's (sadly) getting new material.
No.193879
Anonymous
Replies:>>193881
>>193872
I think Batkek was nominated separately from Batman, he just didn't qualify. Good catch though.
No.193881
Anonymous
Image:174496185359.jpg(571kB, 900x1366)Superboy-Prime vs Batman Who Laughs.jpg
>>193879
I mainly say this cause recently I've been going through old Ms. and Mr. /co/ threads, I'm on 2021 right now, Batkek was nominated, but apparently just folded into Batman, and it got me thinking about other alternate versions of characters.
I'm not here to advocate every Multiverse variant should be considered separate necessarily, but it's something worth discussing, specially for alternates that are vastly different and/or have taken lives of their own.
Like, is Ultraman from Earth-3 different enough from regular Supes? They even had different names one time, Ultra was Kal-Il. What about Superboy Prime? I think he's definitely different enough despite also being named Clark Kent.
And what about the mess that is Superwoman from Earth-3, she's technically a Wonder Woman variant, but she's actually Lois Lane, Mary Marvel in that one movie, and most recently Donna Troy in the comics, would she only count if Wondy, Lois, Mary, and Donna didn't get in? I could probably go on and on about these fringe cases, don't even get me started on Stan Lee's weird versions of DC characters who all have different names.
Sorry if this has already been discussed, and it may seem like a non-issue considering how comic characters don't even get particularly far in these competitions, but it's something I wanted to bring up cause I'd actually like to see how one or two of these variants could do by themselves without being overshadowed by their main counterparts.
No.193882
Anonymous
>>193881
It’s fascinating how this is mostly a DC thing; so many multiverse variants and legacy characters give them unique challenges in the tournaments.
By comparison, the only real equivalent on Marvel’s side is the Jean Grey and Dark Phoenix kerfuffle.
No.193883
Anonymous
>>193872
>Like, Supergirl and Power Girl are technically the same person, but they're quite different from each other.
To cotton onto this, there's Linda Danvers, an Earthborn Angel with no connections to Kara Zor-El.
So that's three distinct versions of Supergirl.
No.193884
Anonymous
Replies:>>193885
>>193882
The Maker?
No.193885
Anonymous
>>193882
>>193881
>>193884
Nominating spiderman (miles morales) next mr. /co/ as well as 50 other spidermen
No.193890
Anonymous
>>193885
I mean some already qualified in 2019
No.193895
Anonymous
All Spider-Man are banned via champion rule
No.193896
Anonymous
>>193895
>>193885
Peter Parker is barred. It never covered the entire Spider-Man identity. That being said most people associate the role with Peter meaning other characters won't make it; no one will seriously have Miles qualify lol.
DC is more fucked since it's much heavier on legacy characters and can have multiple characters carry the same identity. Look at Jay, Barry, and Wally.
No.193898
Anonymous
Replies:>>193900
>>193896
>Peter Parker is barred.
now i'm thinking it would be funny to have peter compete in the barred tournament this year. he technically counts
No.193900
Anonymous
>>193898
Hm. Why don't more people try sneaking winners into barred come to think of it?
No.193901
Anonymous
Would Joe Fixit be separate or does he get folded into Bruce Banner/Hulk?
No.193904
Anonymous
>>193901
I think that characters with multiple personalities like Hulk,Two-Face, or Captain Underpants should all still count as 1 character, mainly cause their different personalities are technically still just part of one single shattered mind, instead of actually being different people, does that make sense?
No.193906
Anonymous
>>193904
It'd be funny if the multiple personalities were treated as a team.
No.193907
Anonymous
Replies:>>193913
>>193904
If something like Killer7 was ever popular enough to qualify, that'd be a really interesting dilemma
No.193908
Anonymous
>>193901
Folded into one character, to me that's like saying Ben Tennyson and his alien forms should be separated.
No.193909
Anonymous
>>193896
As confirmed with Batkek and various other DC and Marvel cheacters and specified in the rules, there is only one interpretation of a character allowed in the tournament so we don’t have multiple of the same characters

Since Spiderman (not Peter Parker, but Spiderman) won and winners are barred regardless of they qualified or not, all versions of Spider-Man’s are now banned. Anything else is trying to to bend the rules to allow Spider-Man back in the tournament
No.193910
Anonymous
Replies:>>193915
>>193909
>all versions of Spider-Man’s are now banned
But that makes no sense, not all Spider-Men are Peter.
No.193912
Anonymous
>>193909
>Since Spiderman (not Peter Parker, but Spiderman) won and winners are barred regardless of they qualified or not, all versions of Spider-Man’s are now banned.
Except that the wiki specifies that it was Peter Parker, not Spider-Man in general that won; as pointed out, not every Spider-Man is Peter, like Miguel or Miles. Legacy characters=/=interpretation of the same character. Unless you're seriously suggesting we fold Dick Grayson and Terry McGinnis into Batman.
No.193913
Anonymous
>>193907
Same with Crazy Jane, Legion, and Critical Mass from Rising Stars
No.193915
Anonymous
>>193910
It’s like if Bugs won and saying you can nominate Happy Rabbit saying he’s different, or if Raven won and nominating TTG Raven. The rules against multiple versions of the same character exist for this reason. There’s no point in nominating additional Spider-man either outside intentionally trying to bend the rules
>>193912
The wiki isn’t officially endorsed
No.193916
Anonymous
>>193915
The wiki is quite literally made by /tnt/, that's as close to official as you can get
No.193917
Anonymous
>>193912
>Unless you're seriously suggesting we fold Dick Grayson and Terry McGinnis into Batman.
See that’s where the conversation gets interesting
It’s already what hosts enforce (see the Batkek debate, or multiple Spider-Mans being left out). In those cases those two are grandfathered in for being voted in top 128 before this took effect, same way Spider-Ham was.
But if Batman won? They’d be banned, because grandfather rule does not apply to the champion ban rule, and that would void the grandfather protection those two have
No.193918
Anonymous
>>193915
>The wiki isn’t officially endorsed
Except it is, the hosts link them in the tournament OPs and the rules.
No.193919
Anonymous
Replies:>>193927
>>193915
>It’s like if Bugs won and saying you can nominate Happy Rabbit saying he’s different, or if Raven won and nominating TTG Raven.
That's not even close to the same, Happy Rabbit is an old version of Bugs, TTG Raven is an adaptation of an adaptation of Raven, Miles is LITERALLY a different person from Peter Parker, they're different people.
No.193920
Anonymous
>>193915
>It’s like if Bugs won and saying you can nominate Happy Rabbit saying he’s different, or if Raven won and nominating TTG Raven.
It is not the same thing because we are referring to legacy characters, which is NOT the same thing as a variant. Legacy characters are distinctly characters who all share the same mantle (Wally and Barry, Sam and Richard, etc).
Hell, Green Lantern is an organization, not a singular identity. Do we ban John, Guy, and Kyle if Hal were to win, despite clearly being different individuals?
No.193921
Anonymous
Replies:>>193923
>>193881
My problem with this is that if we allow one, we'd have to allow everyone.
Let's say we allow Batkek, what about all the other Dark Multiverse variants? I guess those are fair game too, and if we allow the Maker, that would mean all of the Ultimate Universe should be allowed too, maybe even the new one, and even DC's Absolute Universe.
I don't think it's worth the trouble.
No.193922
Anonymous
Replies:>>193924
>>193917
If you want to make this an even bigger mindfuck; some legacies jump genders, meaning it's entirely possible different Robins could win both Ms. and Mr. hypothetically speaking.
No.193923
Anonymous
>>193921
My only answer to that is that absolutely no one cares about the Dark Multiverse outside of Batkek, you're not gonna see Red Death or Mindhunter suddenly become dark horses, those type of characters probably wouldn't even get to the first round.
Truth is that certain characters have outgrown their original universes and variants, Power Girl, the Maker, and Superboy-Prime also come to mind. We don't even have to allow everyone from their universes, just acknowledge that these characters have changed so much that maybe they should be exceptions to the rule.
Again, I'm not saying every alternate version should be counted as a separate character, most of them comic should be treated the same as TV adaptations imo, but I think there are definitely certain cases where characters should be considered separately.
No.193924
Anonymous
Image:174500864688.jpg(205kB, 943x896)Earth11.jpg
>>193922
Oh, we could make this discussion even more annoying.
No.193925
Anonymous
Image:174500867162.png(65kB, 355x328)1630522695312.png
>>193917
>implying Stats didn't simply abuse a ruling loophole out of bias and wanting to fuck over Batkek specifically
No.193926
Anonymous
>>193917
Batkek is excluded because he's Bruce Wayne, not because he's Batman.
No.193927
Anonymous
>>193919
Miles is the alternative parallel universe Spider-Man. Even if they distinct name and identity it’s still Spider-Man. I’ve seen Spider-Ham banned (even if supposed to be grandfathered) due to this, even if he has a different name and design than Peter. The generalization rule applies to all characters of the same identity, which means all Spider-Mans
If we’re going that route of allowing it it’s going to be so messy. Quite a few champions I could bring back because it’s different interpretations like Miles
No.193928
Anonymous
Replies:>>193932
>>193927
Like who? Not a single other champion has a legacy character attached to them because that's mostly a comic thing.
No.193929
Anonymous
Replies:>>193938
>>193927
Again, different people holding the mantle=/=different interpretations.
Even if you invoke parallel universes (which is bullshit since Miles lives in the same universe as Peter now), that still doesn't account for the Flashes, the Green Lanterns, or even the Trinity.
The generalization rule was for different adaptations, not altnertae identities.
No.193930
Anonymous
>>193927
>even if he has a different name and design than Peter.
It's a different character altogether. LEGACY =/= ALTERNATE VERSION.
Btw if I were you I wouldn't be giving this position you are defending right now so much weight because anyone with a few working neurons would understand Miles would never qualify, let alone win. This is issue concerns other characters.
No.193931
Anonymous
>>193930
>Dick could get fucked over because he took over as Batman for a short time
>Hal could get screwed if John wins, despite being the more beloved GL
DC is a such a unique ball of wax even considering the other comics that use legacies.
No.193932
Anonymous
>>193927
Peter and Miles are different people, Miles isn't Ultimate Peter, he's his own person.
Spider-Man is just a mantle, not an actual person, but an identity used by many different people.
>>193928
Not a champion, but I immediately thought of G1 Megatron and BW Megatron, both different characters but using the same name.
No.193933
Anonymous
>>193930
That’s why I don’t see why people are getting uppity over saying the rules in effect should be applied
Spider-Man won and it was exciting. Don’t know why people need to try to proxy in Spider-man with variants now when it’s been banned for years. If you want Spider-man universe characters to campaign or talk about JJJ is still there
No.193934
Anonymous
Replies:>>193942
>>193932
>Not a champion, but I immediately thought of G1 Megatron and BW Megatron, both different characters but using the same name.
Oh that's a good catch. How does that work?
No.193935
Anonymous
>>193933
>trying to sort out how legacy characters is somehow being "uppity"
You're so hyper focused on the Spider-Man shit that you're ignoring other legitimate examples people have brought up.
No.193936
Anonymous
>>193933
>Spider-Man won and it was exciting.
>exciting
Yeah keep telling yourself that…
No.193937
Anonymous
Image:174501006263.jpg(25kB, 600x600)1617751208444.jpg
>>193933
>Don’t know why people need to try to proxy in Spider-man with variants now
Because this is something you just made up inside your head.
No.193938
Anonymous
>>193929
>>193932
Parker is different than Porker and they have appeared together, yet the later has been banned for this reason
TTG Starfire and TT03 Starfire have appeared together in media, and yet they can’t be nominated separate
These issues are why the generalization statute exists, and if we’re trying to break it because we like a character who isn’t allowed anymore should we just vote to scrap the rule?
No.193939
Anonymous
>>193938
I'd have it be a case-by-case basis instead of having a general rule.
No.193940
Anonymous
Replies:>>193945
>>193938
>TTG Starfire and TT03 Starfire have appeared together in media, and yet they can’t be nominated separate
No one is arguing for different adaptations getting different slots you retard, we realize that this is covered by generalization rule. You keep avoiding the legitimate examples of legacy characters to make our arguments stupider than they are and act like we want to scrap all the rules.
No.193941
Anonymous
Replies:>>193950
>>193938
>Parker is different than Porker and they have appeared together, yet the later has been banned for this reason
Okay but how does this apply to the Green Lantern Corp, they don't even share the same names phonetically.
No.193942
Anonymous
Replies:>>193944
>>193934
G1 Megatron is the original, BW Megatron exists in the far future and Megatron isn't his actual name, but he changed it when he became a terrorist.
TRANSFORMERS: THE BASICS on Beast Wars MEGATRONyoutube thumb
No.193943
Anonymous
>>193936
Did people not like Peter winning? I missed 2024 and was surprised to hear he won cause I think he was getting cucked by Paul around that time.
No.193944
Anonymous
Replies:>>193964
>>193942
Sorry should have worded it better; how would this scenario work in the tournaments? Anyone familiar with the lore would know they're different character with the same names but someone might want to enact "generalization ruling". Same with Primal to a lesser extent.
No.193945
Anonymous
>>193940
The examples brought up are grandfathered in because they were in the top 128 before the rule took effect, and we now have an unprecedented instance of the superhero identity winning and being retired
Those examples are either generalized into one candidate, or grandfathered in and would be banned if the main character interpretation won
No.193946
Anonymous
Replies:>>193951
>>193945
are you stupid
No.193947
Anonymous
Replies:>>193952
>>193943
You are responding to /v/irgin schizobabble.
No.193948
Anonymous
>>193945
Yet none of the examples are legacy characters the way it's being defined here or even collective identities like GLC. How do you miss the point this hard?
No.193949
Anonymous
Replies:>>193959
>>193945
>the superhero identity
Peter won, not all Spider-Men ever.
No.193950
Anonymous
>>193941
Because that’s an instance where a different name and design entirely doesn’t change that it’s Spider-Man, and that’s how hosts historically applied the generalization rule
If their main identity is Green Lantern, then they apply for generalization as one “Green Lantern” candidate
No.193951
Anonymous
>>193946
Please be patient with him, he has autism.
No.193952
Anonymous
>>193943
>>193947
/co/ wanted JJJ to win. It sucks he's been reduced to a "Spider-Man proxy" just so people can vote for him. I don't see how that's /v/ related.
No.193953
Anonymous
>>193950
Ah, so Hal Jordan is the same as Mogo, okay retard.
No.193954
Anonymous
Replies:>>193955
>>193950
I thought the generalization rule existed for adaptations and alternate universe versions of the same character, not characters with shared mantles.
No.193955
Anonymous
>>193954
Exactly; I have yet to see one instance of the hosts ever bringing up legacies in regards to rulings.
No.193956
Anonymous
>>193953
tbf I would vote for Mogo if he did actually qualify
No.193957
Anonymous
>>193953
How I apply it isn’t how hosts do, if you don’t like that interpretation talk with them and ask to put generalization rule to vote
Its forward thinking it that it was made for if scenarios like Spider-man winning occurred and how to handle it
No.193958
Anonymous
>>193957
Show us where the hosts ever said anything about different characters with the same identity
No.193959
Anonymous
>>193949
It was put up during the tournament as “Spider-man”, which is all of them.
You just associate the most with Peter as the main version but per generalization it applies for the hero identity itself
No.193960
Anonymous
>>193957
I don't think anyone with half a brain would argue Miles is now banned cause Peter won.
Not like Miles would even get far anyway, but come on man, don't be dense.
No.193961
Anonymous
>>193953
Even stupider is that Green Lantern is more of a job title than a secret identity; it would be like submitting a bunch of characters under "Cop" because that's their job.
Though if you want really make it weirder, bring up Alan Scott and his Starheart…
No.193962
Anonymous
>>193959
Because people know Peter as THE Spider-Man, but he's not the only Spider-Man.
Again, the rule is for alternate versions and adaptations, not shared mantles.
No.193963
Anonymous
>>193959
It was the Peter Parker version, something even the wiki takes time to point out. Generalization never applied to titles, that's just something you made up to be a hall monitor.
No.193964
Anonymous
Replies:>>193966
>>193944
I mean, just make it clear they're separate characters I guess, it shouldn't be more different than Bruce and Terry.
No.193965
Anonymous
Is there a source for Spider-Ham getting banned? I know he qualified for Mr. /co/ 2019 and he was nominated for 2022 but was never banned from qualifiers.
No.193966
Anonymous
>>193964
Miles was even nominated under his own name rather than Spider-Man, I don't know where people are getting that he's banned too,
No.193967
Anonymous
Replies:>>193968
Image:174501195634.jpg(137kB, 445x630)atom smasher.JPG
So is he good or does he skirt too close to the Atom identity?
No.193968
Anonymous
Replies:>>193970
>>193967
He's a different guy with an Atom-adjacent identity, he's fine, and so are all the other Atoms, they're all different people.
Even if no one would vote for them, get real.
No.193969
Anonymous
Image:174501215073.png(1.48MB, 728x1112)Miles_Morales_(Earth-616)_from_Miles_Morales_Spider-Man_Vol_1_10_001.png
Erm, Ultimate Miles is actually just an alternate version of this guy.
No.193970
Anonymous
>>193968
Just you wait, the Atom Project will sweep 2025!
No.193971
Anonymous
Replies:>>193983
Can someone tell me how to access sharty please?
No.193975
Anonymous
>>193895
I like how this comment was so retarded everyone forgot about the original argument.
No.193977
Anonymous
>>193933
>Don’t know why people need to try to proxy in Spider-man with variants now when it’s been banned for years.
I only think this is a funny hypothetical scenario, i dont think anyone's actually gonna do something like this.
Right?
No.193983
Anonymous
>>193971
First, you creampie your own butthole
No.193984
Anonymous
The Batman who laughs should be allowed to qualify owlman too.
No.193987
Anonymous
>>193965
>no one can prove this
So it's made-up schizo shit, then?
No.193989
Anonymous
Image:174502052481.jpg(89kB, 548x724)owlman.JPG
>>193984
As it turns out, there's a distinct version of Owlman that already coexists with Batman on the main earth, with a similar backstory. So he can compete legitimately.
No.193991
Anonymous
Image:174502066224.jpg(53kB, 360x450)Owlman.jpg
>>193984
>not Batman
>not Bruce Wayne
Why wouldn't Owlman be able to qualify? He's completely different in both of his identities from Bruce.
No.193992
Anonymous
Replies:>>193993
>>193989
Yeah, but no one cares about this Owlman, it's Thomas Wayne Jr. who people care about.
No.193993
Anonymous
Replies:>>193995
>>193992
He's implied to be both in the antimatter and main universe
No.193995
Anonymous
>>193993
Earth 3 Owlman is Thomas Wayne Jr., but the New 52 Earth Prime Owlman was just Lincoln March bullshitting about being TWJ.
No.193996
Anonymous
Replies:>>193997
>>193984
For no particular reason, any other alternate versions you think should be allowed? Anyone can answer this question.
Just trying to see something.
No.193997
Anonymous
>>193996
Would Orson Scott Card's Iron Man count? That was retconned into an anime within the original Ultimate Marvel continuity.
No.193998
Anonymous
>>193989
Lincoln March isn't needed since the Owlman from the alternate Earth already isn't Batman nor Bruce Wayne, he's his own separate character too.
No.193999
Anonymous
This will be the thing that decides Hank's fate in the tournaments.

https://x.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1913254825107599491
No.194000
Anonymous
Replies:>>194002
>>193999
How is it that we barely know anything about this despite coming so soon. No trailers, no art outside the older Bobby, basically under wraps.
No.194002
Anonymous
>>194000
That seems to be a trend with the Fox revivals lately. Hulurama came out on July 24 but the first trailer for that IIRC was in late June.
No.194003
Anonymous
>>193999
>if this ends up sucking, Hank could possibly go the way of Doomguy
Why does everything need to be rebooted or get sequels?
No.194004
Anonymous
>>194003
We live in the era of reboots and revivals cause it's safer to bring back an old property that already proved itself to be successful than it is to greenlight a completely new and unproved new IP.
No.194005
Anonymous
>>194003
At least there's a chance it won't suck if Mike Judge is involved. Even the Beavis and Butt-head revival was pretty solid all things considered.
No.194006
Anonymous
Replies:>>194009
>>194003
>>194005
And it's not like Samurai Jack started out as a jobber in 2018 a year after season 5.
No.194007
Anonymous
Replies:>>194008
Speaking of new cartoons, the pilot for that new Glitch Studios show, Gaslight District, dropped a few hours ago. Guesses on its tourney performance?
No.194008
Anonymous
>>194007
It's hard to tell what /co/ thinks of the pilot thanks to the 4chan nuke. But it probably won't be an OC darling like Drones or getting decent runs like the Circus characters.
No.194009
Anonymous
Replies:>>194037
>>194006
The whole nostalgia accusations lobbed at /co/ are funny since it usually means we look at the better times rather than focus on how shit it became in recent years.
Meanwhile on /v/, if you have a game that's even halfway controversial, that franchise is permafucked.
No.194010
Anonymous
>>194005
It was solid the both times B&B was revived, something not even Futurama managed.
No.194011
Anonymous
Image:174502399300.jpg(1.36MB, 4960x5015)1634083677008.jpg
Might as well try asking here, did anyone save the high quality version of this image?
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/126315339/#126324072
The catbox link in this post is dead and not archived in the Wayback Machine, and I also couldn't find the image in the Mr. /co/ booru nor the dropbox.
No.194012
Anonymous
>>194005
Johnny Hardwick's death will be one tough shadow to overcome
No.194016
Anonymous
Replies:>>194017
>>193965
Away from computer so can’t look back at it but I can tell you he 100% wasn’t allowed one year for this reason and will show later in the week
No.194017
Anonymous
>>194016
>will show later in the week
Well if you’re confident about it you’d show it right away.
No.194023
Anonymous
>>194005
>Beavis and Butthead revival
We're cooked.
No.194029
Anonymous
Replies:>>194031
>>193936
We know Kingbro.
No.194031
Anonymous
Replies:>>194032
>>194029
There were better options available
No.194032
Anonymous
>>194031
Nah, Spiderman is one of the most logical 4chan winners ever. "This is now a Spiderman thread" is one of the oldest ongoing memes, and Raimiposting has been a joke forever. He might be the most fitting winner of all of tournaments, because he not only is a strong representative of /co/, he's also huge on /b/ and /tv/ and could've very well win in a theoretical contest for those boards. "One more Day" also needed a fat middle finger thrown against it.
No.194034
Anonymous
Replies:>>194035
>>194032
Pairing Frankie off with Spider-Man won't do anything against One More Day. If anything it pissed people off.
No.194035
Anonymous
Replies:>>194038
>>194034
yeah she should've gotten with a little boy
No.194036
Anonymous
>>194032
>Spider-Man is basically Recette if she were a good winner
No.194037
Anonymous
Replies:>>194039
>>194009
Hell, Hornet jobbed last year purely because her game still wasn't out, even though it wasn't out in 2022 either. Silksong is either going to make her a perma-jobber if it disappoints or fling FOTM accusations if it's great.
No.194038
Anonymous
>>194035
Industrycuck…
No.194039
Anonymous
Replies:>>194041
>>194037
>fling FOTM accusations
Something people are already preparing for Hank because of the revival. You just cannot have new content released in these things.
No.194040
Anonymous
>>193999
I'm already not looking forward to what will happen to Kahn and what will be left of Dale. Bobby living in Dallas could also go in a lot of ways.
No.194041
Anonymous
>>194039
I don’t think it can work on a character who’s already an established powerhouse. FOTM accusations only really work on someone who’s had a shaky/poor record then suddenly starts succeeding.
No.194042
Anonymous
Hank Hill is going to be FOTM this year because of the new show