/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Please consider donating! Thanks!

Thread stats: 1001 posts, 162 files (161 image(s), 1 video(s))

Replying to /tnt/102718
Options
No.102718
Ms. and Mr. /co/ Off-Season Discussion Thread #9Anonymous
Image:170818499486.png(337kB, 1000x1000)d2e9c0dbbcec70b9075246337ef79b9fe528dd71.png
Can't beat the classics edition
No.102721
Anonymous
Image:170818563871.png(205kB, 564x423)dg2o1l6-ca6b3089-c550-4f6a-a569-38f7832bbe1f.png
The last thread isn't even dead yet.
No.102724
Anonymous
Replies:>>103273
>>102721
999, 1000, what's the difference?
No.102725
Anonymous
Replies:>>102779
Will be spitevoting against Disney and indie characters btw. All of them are just wasted slots and early round fodder.
No.102726
Anonymous
Image:170818634298.jpg(127kB, 860x1250)5011d5066fc38ce366d9cdcd1af0bfc2.jpg
>>102718
Robotfuckers WON.
No.102729
Anonymous
Image:170818733037.jpg(146kB, 1092x1185)enaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg
>>102723
based ENA voter
No.102735
Anonymous
>>102726
Johnny Bravo and Grimm are so lucky
No.102737
Anonymous
Replies:>>102769
>You posted some of the most popular /co/ girls who regularly get threads and high seeds, and you act like wanting them to win is some controversial minority opinion?
absolutely. Have you never seen a Mrs. /co/ tournament before?
No.102754
Anonymous
Replies:>>102853
>>102712
Tulip is basically in the same class as Disney loretoon girls.
No.102760
Anonymous
Replies:>>102772
You all think Spinel and Wuya are deserving of wins your "opinions" are worthless
No.102769
Anonymous
>>102737
Then who are the non-controversial picks? The winners that everyone loves and that never cause any dissatisfaction postfactum? Oh wait.
No.102772
Anonymous
>>102760
>Spinel
No one has said this.
>Wuya
No one says this anymore.
No.102779
Anonymous
Replies:>>102785
>>102725
Spitevoting has wreaked havoc on the past three tourneys and you still haven't learned a lesson about it
No.102785
Anonymous
>>102779
>taking troll posts at face value
No.102852
Anonymous
>>102726
>"robot"
>it's a human with gray skin
No.102853
Anonymous
>>102754
I'd say her class a bit higher considering she doesn't attract the same amounts of vitriol.
No.102855
Anonymous
>>102726
These are not good robots.
t. robotfucker
No.102875
Anonymous
>>102785
That's not a troll post.
No.102891
Anonymous
>>102785
Normally I'd agree it's a troll post, but since we're talking about ms. /co/...
No.102897
Anonymous
I'll only vote for Disney and indie characters if they have good YTPs.
No.102934
Anonymous
>>102897
>Geralt loses Co-op
>Relapses in his YTP addiction
No.102956
Anonymous
Image:170821042528.jpg(159kB, 533x400)1611165347_400.jpg
>>102897
>decided to look up their YTPs for shits and giggles
>found something with 4.3 million views...
[YTP] Zoodystopiayoutube thumb
No.102980
Anonymous
Announcement when? Just do it now I don’t care about these retarded side tournaments
No.103037
Anonymous
>>102980
nigga just wait a day
No.103051
Anonymous
>>102980
It's only gonna take another day chill.
No.103124
Anonymous
Predict what Ghost's anooncement will entail.
No.103137
Anonymous
Replies:>>103166
>>103124
I hope it’s about NightShift formally stepping down. Predicting it’s Ghost stepping down instead.
No.103166
Anonymous
Image:170822428600.png(178kB, 480x360)5iot9h.png
>>103137
Ah shit I forgot about that second option. That's way more likely.
No.103168
Anonymous
Replies:>>103270
>>103124
"NSA says the pastebin is confirmed to be releasing sometime in 2024 so just be patient"
No.103270
Anonymous
Replies:>>103291
>>103168
Wasn't it released when she was banned?
No.103271
Anonymous
At this point, is there ANYTHING that could realistically be shown in a Pastebin that might make you change your mind on NightShiftAnon?
No.103273
Anonymous
>>102721
>>102724
It now reached it BTW.
No.103274
Anonymous
>>103271
I could easily get a WORSE opinion of her than I already have.
No.103278
Anonymous
Replies:>>103323
>>103271
No, nothing’s changing the fact that NSA is a spiteful fujo who gets assmad when her pet picks lose.
No.103291
Anonymous
>>103124
I don't know I'm actually kind of optimistic that the announcement will be that NSA is no longer hosting, I recognize that's cope to some degree because I really just want to leave The Fall of NSA behind us but I think it could actually happen. Granted it's most likely going to be NSA getting forced out rather than NSA stepping down of his own free will because lmao like that's ever gonna happen, but I'll still take it
>>103270
NSA got banned? Did I miss something?
No.103323
Anonymous
Image:170824811610.png(24kB, 240x240)1458531418797.png
>>103278
>fujo
Why the fuck do you guys keep saying NSA is a fujo? Absolutely nothing about her art and interests suggests she's one: A "fujoshi" is a woman who primarily consumes and/or makes Yaoi/Boys Love content, it's not just a catch-all term for female coomers in online fandoms. Stop using otaku terminology wrong.
If anything, NSA is closer to the definition of yumejoshi: a woman who obsesses over a specific character from a piece of media AKA a husbando/waifufag AKA a self-inserter.
No.103324
Anonymous
Replies:>>103326
>>103323
>ackshually
NSA is a big fat stinky FUJO BITCH.
No.103325
Anonymous
>>103323
Well you see it's because nobody likes fujos, and nobody likes NSA, so it fits
Personally I just call NSA a nigger, much more to the point (also i refuse to call him a woman)
No.103326
Anonymous
Replies:>>103328
>>103324
I mean, for the longest time many people here refused to believe she was actually female even though there were many signs pointing at it since the beginning. Most wouldn't have thought the anon making the WuyaxEris porno was a woman.
No.103328
Anonymous
Replies:>>103329
>>103326
What signs were there prior to the whole OFA reveal? They were kind of irrational and non-negotiable but that was attributed to them being an asshole autist instead of a woman.
No.103329
Anonymous
>>103328
The prime focuses of her art, interests, ways of interaction with other posters and attitude as a whole. I'm not exclusively talking about NSA the host here but OFA the drawfag. Silver anon put it very well when people asked for his reasoning as to why he suspected NSA/OFA was a woman.
Like, you people seriously didn't entertain the notion the Black Hatfag from Mr. /co/ was a guy, right???
No.103330
Anonymous
>>103329
I meant NSA exclusively before the scandal. Nevermind.
No.103333
Anonymous
>>103329
Every anon on 4chan is a man until proven otherwise ("tits or gtfo" exists for a reason), it was perfectly reasonable to assume Black Hatfag was just some raging homo
No.103334
Anonymous
Image:170825516619.jpg(260kB, 500x486)i bet batman never does this to his parents.jpg
>girls
>on the internet
anon...
No.103336
Anonymous
>>103333
>it was perfectly reasonable to assume Black Hatfag was just some raging homo
Maybe if you are reclusive autist who has had no social interactions with women outside his own family. It's not like /co/ is infamous for being one of the hobby boards with the highest percentage of female posters or anything like that.
No.103337
Anonymous
Replies:>>103340
>>103336
Why are girls so interested in western comics and cartoons anyway?
No.103340
Anonymous
Replies:>>103341
>>103336
Damn /co/ has 5% women instead of 1%, I guess next time I see someone lusting over a male character it has to be a woman
>>103337
They aren't
No.103341
Anonymous
>>103340
It's not like it's impossible for gay men to have overlapping tastes with women in fictional characters and specific archetypes (which is already a rare occurrence with "Tumblr sexymen" mind you, although it does happen), but the kind of adoration NSA/OFA expressed towards some of her favorites is that of a woman. It's glaringly obvious from miles away if you have ever interacted with nerdy women. Hell, just go to a random husbandofag lust thread be it on /co/, /a/ or /v/, and it's super fucking easy to tell apart when the anon posting is a gay dude or a female.
No.103347
Anonymous
>>103333
Homo’s almost never lust after Tumblr Sexymen like Black Hat, this is something that’s done nigh exclusively by women.
No.103358
Anonymous
I hate this "le epin shared board culture you have to wait until /v/'s circlejerk ends" meme
No, there is very little shared board culture. I never participate in any of /v/'s shit and many others don't either. Many of /v/'s fags don't participate in /co/'s contests. The idea that they are "shared" is wrong and cancerous and it's holding back critical information so people who don't give a shit about our tournament can finish stuffing Wario paper in their ass
No.103359
Anonymous
Image:170827212623.jpg(199kB, 731x1163)L.jpg
>>103358
No.103361
Anonymous
Replies:>>103368
>>103323
She draws gay porn of her male avatar getting raped.
No.103368
Anonymous
>>103361
It only happened with King Kong and it was done in a very tongue-in-cheek fashion, and remember that NSA also drew that same avatar being sexually assaulted by Miku. I hope people understand how that whole stunt was in essence an attempt at making anons amicable to idea of adopting the NSA avatar as a global tournament mascot or otherwise simple attention whoring through self-humiliation.
No.103370
Anonymous
Replies:>>103378
Image:170827533266.jpg(58kB, 640x632)5ee.jpeg
>>103358
No.103375
Anonymous
>>103358
normally i’d agree but this is very much a cross-board tournament issue
No.103378
Anonymous
>>103370
SamePUTA...
No.103455
Anonymous
>>103358
Bejitabro btw
No.103459
Anonymous
No.103477
Anonymous
Replies:>>103492
>NONONO WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A SHARED TOURNAMENT CULTURE WITH ME THE CENTRAL LEADER AND ICON OF THESE BOARDS YOU CAN'T JUST NOT PARTICIPATE IN KING OF /V/ YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO CARE ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR WESKER
Kek NSA is seething
No.103481
Anonymous
Why does anyone care about the side tourneys? Assuming there are no duplicates the main tournaments get like 10x more voters.
No.103482
Anonymous
>>103481
It's fun for lesser known characters and it can also serve as practice for the main deal.
No.103484
Anonymous
>>103481
They're often better than most the main tourneys.
No.103490
Anonymous
>>103481
Other anon said it well but it's mostly characters who'd never have a chance to make a tournament but have a more vocal support base getting a chance to be in something as well as tournament dry runs for how to approach a character's campaign
The results are entirely meaningless though, only 100 voters and one drawanon making a few drawings can put randos into elite 8, and TTT 2022 was so rigged it pretty much delegitimized them as respected tournaments. Still fun though
No.103492
Anonymous
Replies:>>103901
>>103477
Speaking as an artist who has active socials outside of being an anonymous drawfag, it's very funny to me how NSA seemingly intended to monopolize the tourneys for her own gain. Absolutely ridiculous and insane if her ultimate main goal here was to become a recognized personality, because the thing she clearly cared about first and foremost was attention towards her art.
No.103866
Anonymous
Where’s the announcement MANSLEY
No.103901
Anonymous
>>103492
Well, she got what she wanted, just not in the way she anticipated.
No.103910
Anonymous
Image:170830485715.png(1.28MB, 1300x866)1681522990385295.png
>>101995
Alright dominos, state your business
No.103912
Anonymous
Where's the announcement?
No.103958
Anonymous
I ate Dominos btw.
No.103959
Anonymous
>>103958
Mid tier chain.
No.103961
Anonymous
>>103958
FATren...
No.103966
Anonymous
Dominos is about to pop in for the big announcement she just beat one of the Skyrim bosses
No.103975
Anonymous
Image:170830690910.png(64kB, 640x519)Noid_Angry_b.png
>>103958
You WHAT?!
No.103989
Anonymous
>>103958
Louie...
No.104008
Anonymous
REEEEEEE I DONT WANNA WAIT ANYMORE
No.104013
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
Image:170830859667.gif(302kB, 257x194)Moving-animated-picture-of-chicken-dancing.gif
Alright, here’s the announcement.



I’m thinking of stepping down from the tournaments. Not because I hate y’all or anything, but because I plan to focus on a project. I am working on a Proof of Concept for a cartoon series idea I've had since high school. And I’m going to need all the help and time I can get, since making this is essentially my dream. If you want to help out with this series, well, you guys already know what my Discord is.

This isn’t a guarantee that I’ll step down, but know that if I ever disappear from hosting, you’ll get why. I've also told Coayyanon that I'd help find new hosts if needed.

As for NightShiftAnon, I’ve asked her a few times about the pastebin and working on my project (since she is a great artist), but she hasn’t responded. In the midst of that, Samaritanon, Coayyanon and I have come to a decision:
If NSA doesn’t release the pastebin the week after /cov/ ends, she’s getting booted from hosting the tournaments.
No.104015
Anonymous
>>104013
Alright so when is cov
No.104025
Anonymous
Image:170830922297.gif(599kB, 250x250)5343C437-AAD2-47A4-A472-B286963B65B4.gif
>>104013
>If NSA doesn’t release the pastebin the week after /cov/ ends, she’s getting booted from hosting the tournaments.
Fucking finally
No.104029
Anonymous
Replies:>>104036
>>104015
Sometime in early Mars or something like that.
No.104031
Anonymous
Replies:>>104463
>>104013
Thank you for taking action and being upfront about everything that's going on
>>104015
It's in March, date has not been specified last I saw. So latest pastebin needs to be out is first week of April, but potentially by mid-march
No.104033
Anonymous
Replies:>>104066
>>104013
>If NSA doesn’t release the pastebin the week after /cov/ ends, she’s getting booted from hosting the tournaments.
Ten bucks says she's gonna release pastebin just before an entire week passes after the end of /cov/ specifically to avoid this and try to stay in power.
No.104036
Anonymous
Image:170830981549.jpg(34kB, 750x560)catpain.jpg
>>104029
>next Mars year starts the 12th of November this year
Fuck
No.104037
Anonymous
>>104013
MY QUEEN
No.104066
Anonymous
>>104033
If she refuses to answer most questions and has leaps in logic, the others should boot her anyway. The deadline should have been sooner because it's been over a month since the promised pastebin.
No.104104
Anonymous
Replies:>>104163
>>104066
I don't even see the point anyway because there is almost zero that could be said to improve the situation and not want everyone to still want her kicked out.
It's better to let the deadline pass and move on with new host leadership then try to make a cope pastebin months later then promised
No.104156
Anonymous
That is way too lenient of a deadline.
No.104163
Anonymous
>>104066
>>104104
If we were going off the information when the Pastebin was first mentioned there might be more worth to it, but the double whammy we got a few weeks ago means there would have to be some major missing pieces to justify NSA here. I don't really see her doing that, especially if she WAS deflecting at earlier points.
No.104359
Anonymous
>>104156
Important fed job. Please understand.
No.104361
Anonymous
Replies:>>104439
Image:170832634558.jpg(22kB, 310x344)when does the round finishes.jpg
>>104013
>If NSA doesn’t release the pastebin the week after /cov/ ends, she’s getting booted from hosting the tournaments.
So there's a god!
No.104439
Anonymous
>>104156
As long as it means NSA can't try to stall until Ms. /co/ it's perfectly fine by me.
>>104361
Jack's smile and optimism... restored...
No.104440
Anonymous
Regardless of what NSA does the only outcome we will accept is her retirement from the hosting position.
No.104446
Anonymous
Replies:>>104463
Image:170835166134.jpg(34kB, 635x635)1674078116991601.png
>>104013
Good luck with your project, Ghost!
No.104463
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
>>104015
>>104031
It starts sometime in Mid-Late March. So NSA's pastebin should be expected in either late March or early April.

>>104031
>>104446
No problem, and thank you! I really want to talk more about my project here, but I don't wish to risk my ideas getting stolen.

All I'll say about the project is that it's kinda similar to The Owl House (despite me having the show idea before TOH aired). I also took inspiration from Invader Zim and Dr. Seuss books for it.
No.104464
Anonymous
Image:170836214289.jpg(131kB, 1920x1080)IMG_2075.jpeg
>>104013
>She
WAIT, NSA’s a girl?
No.104465
Anonymous
Image:170836237745.jpg(115kB, 922x922)1655695901046.jpg
>>104463
hmmm
No.104467
Anonymous
Replies:>>104521
Image:170836312655.jpg(774kB, 1721x920)D34F388C-5ED1-45D9-9E73-511EEAE4DD43.jpeg
>>104464
did you finally figure that out?
No.104468
Anonymous
Replies:>>104521
>>104464
Welcome newfren
No.104471
Anonymous
Replies:>>104521
Image:170836462830.png(120kB, 800x751)slowpoke.png
>>104464
>
No.104473
Anonymous
Replies:>>106116
Image:170836577262.png(113kB, 477x429)1603127789121.png
>>104463
You are pitching for what company? Good luck regardless.
No.104481
Anonymous
Image:170836982899.png(103kB, 2632x2588)Colympus Suffering Chart 6.png
Mr. /co/ winners that aren't placed are
>Kronk, General Grievous and Zorak
Ms. /co/ winner that isn't placed
>Betty Boop
No.104482
Spideranon !!hAaBXjbZBz7
>>104463
>/co/ tourneys could have a contestant from a host-made cartoon in the future
But for real good luck G
No.104483
Anonymous
>>104464
they/them pronouns. Either a gay tranny or a femautost who's a big fujo. We don't know which but people have more fun assuming a girl
No.104484
Anonymous
Been away for a while, someone give me a good ol' rundown of wtf's been going on?
No.104486
Anonymous
>>104484
https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/NightShiftAnon_/_OnlyFansart_incident
No.104487
Anonymous
>>104484
Remember in King /v/ where the Erikanon busted some drawfag for being a bitch? That drawfag was basically confirmed to be NSA by Black Hand here on /tnt/ by checking IP locations.
No.104488
Anonymous
>>104484
NightShiftAnon is SHIT and FINISHED.
No.104489
Anonymous
>>104484
TL;DR NSA got exposed as a falseflagging spiteful drawfag and also has most likely been involved in rigging, and probably won't be hosting anymore
If you want a proper rundown on recent events you can read this https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/NightShiftAnon_/_OnlyFansart_incident
No.104490
Anonymous
Replies:>>104495
Image:170837456552.png(28kB, 720x872)1671155270699.png
*sighs*
No.104494
Anonymous
>>104489
>As one last hit, he confirmed that one post trying to defend NSA in the ongoing thread also lined up with their ISP, giving possible credence that they had been actively following along in the threads.
That was me. I wasn't defending NSA, I was not agreeing with leaking the city locations. I have helped with the investigation prior. There was also confirmination another ISP with opposite views of mine in the thread matched as well.
No.104495
Anonymous
>>104490
Based.
No.104496
Anonymous
>>104489
Honestly, some parts of this article kinda suck at being informative.

In "More connections come to light":
>While most was either straightforward or already known, including Ghost being Dominos and Numnuts being tourney anon
Then, in "Ghost response":
>This was off another shocking reveal: Ghost had actually been Dominos under a new name after the Tag-Team 2021 incident.

So was it a shocking reveal or was it already known? And yes, I remember that the Ghost response happened before Black Hat looked into things. But then why does the article place it AFTER Black Hat? That's just weird.

And the final part about the fonts is pretty poorly explained and only really makes sense if you were there. The "infamous font" isn't mentioned in the article before this at all.
No.104497
Anonymous
Replies:>>104504
>>104496
Article writer here. I added the reaction section prior to all that coming out. Been thinking on rearranging it, and now that you mention that now I can get on that real quick.

>>104494
Oh really? Apologies, I didn't get the full extent of that when it went down. I can remove that section then, especially since there's already more important information there.
No.104498
Anonymous
Replies:>>104503
>>104494
>>104496
The admin also just locked the page, so only he can further edit it. I'm kind of bothered there's no mention to the events of King of /v/ 2022 in the article at all even though a lot of important leads and evidence for the case go back to that tournament.
No.104499
Anonymous
Replies:>>104503
>>104489
>2024
>Article still does not mention the time NSA left their trip on and was campaigning for Black Hat against other characters
No.104500
Anonymous
Replies:>>104503
>>104496
IIRC some were speculating that Ghost was Dominos before the reveal, so the wording could be fixed there. 
No.104503
Anonymous
>>104498
>The admin also just locked the page, so only he can further edit it.
Thought it was only locked from being moved? I could double check real quick.

>I'm kind of bothered there's no mention to the events of King of /v/ 2022 in the article at all even though a lot of important leads and evidence for the case go back to that tournament.
That could certainly be added to the background. Article was designed to open with the muzzle incident since that's what led to the accusations actually coming out, but that could be added in now with it basically being confirmed. Added a mention of concerns over AM being rigged out to the potential rigging section.

>>104500
>IIRC some were speculating that Ghost was Dominos before the reveal, so the wording could be fixed there.
Yeah, that's fair enough. Went ahead and changed that part slightly.

>>104499
Okay, so what happened is that I had a whole plan to flesh out a big section of the article, but then I ran into a lot of BS on my side unrelated to anything here. Since this all is coming back into discussion, I'll try to finally grab the time to finish that up.
No.104504
Anonymous
Replies:>>104505
>>104497
>Oh really? Apologies, I didn't get the full extent of that when it went down. I can remove that section then, especially since there's already more important information there.
Just add a section about this post. >>92339 Even if I got caught in the middle of it, there is some important information there, like ISPs being muddied and anons did think I was NSA for a moment.  
No.104505
Anonymous
Replies:>>104507
>>104504
Alright, sounds good.
No.104506
Anonymous
Alright, I've updated the page a lot to reflect feedback in this thread. Still need to get around to covering the rest of the earlier accusations, but everything that's come up lately should at least hopefully be covered here.

https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/NightShiftAnon_/_OnlyFansart_incident

The page should be open to edit by anyone? If there's any trouble with specific protections, I can simply just roll those back for sake of ease right now.
No.104507
Anonymous
>>104505
Maybe a rewording that I was concerned about revealing cities and not defending NSA, though anons did mistake it for me defending her as well.
No.104509
Anonymous
Replies:>>104510
>>104506
Thanks and sorry we're making you do all of this.
No.104510
Anonymous
Replies:>>104513
>>104509
Nah, it's fine. Even if some personal timing was bad for me with the wiki, the article was certainly due for a proper clean-up. I'd rather this resource exist going forward for the sake of informing people about all that's gone down surrounding this.

I'll find the time to go back through previous threads and summarize the earlier points not in there yet. It's unfortunately a bit of a pain in the ass with the relevant posts being across the span of thousands of replies, but I also would like to keep sourcing the posts as well to make sure the article comes off as well-researched.

If there's one request I could give, would love if that person who contacted OnlyFansart directly on DeviantArt could share that response again. For some reason, that one post kept eluding me despite searching up various key terms with it.
No.104513
Anonymous
Replies:>>104514
No.104514
Anonymous
>>104513
Thank you so much for that.
No.104516
Anonymous
>>104506
You're a good writer and I love our wikianons over the years
No.104521
Anonymous
Replies:>>104522
>>104467
>>104468
>>104471
Sorry, I wasn’t here during the big Nightshift incident, I was present for tagteam so I did witness quite a bit already
No.104522
Anonymous
Image:170838317126.jpg(23kB, 450x333)lungeread.jpg
>>104521
Well, now you know
No.104523
Samaritanon !!0q4n9L7G/iU
Replies:>>104524
>>104013
Hey Ghost, good luck with your project. Coayy might've already told you there's something I want to talk about. Would be nice if we could discuss it before you step down because I don't think anyone else left could provide independent info on that.
No.104524
Anonymous
Replies:>>104525
>>104523
Is it something about NSA tampering with the votes and rounds?
No.104525
Anonymous
>>104524
I don't want to pry much, but curious as well here. That being said, it could be something far more innocent like simply asking her about certain aspects related to general hosting.
No.104526
Anonymous
Image:170838399310.jpg(67kB, 828x465)V2.jfif
It seems like the Space Ghost characters will be coming to Jellystone (they're cosplaying the Galaxy Trio here) but there's no screenshot to confirm if Space Ghost himself will be in.
No.104527
Anonymous
Replies:>>104528
>>104526
If Zorak is genderswapped in Jellystone would she be allowed to participate in Ms /co/?
No.104528
Anonymous
>>104527
That's actually a good question, but believe the answer is no if it involves intertwined tournaments?
No.104596
Anonymous
Fanggang who are we supporting this year?
I nominate Brisby
No.104598
Anonymous
Replies:>>104599
>>104596
I don't think they are even active unless Primal ever comes back. But I will support Brisby too.
No.104599
Anonymous
>>104598
I agree with everything in this reply. I'm sure some tournament frequenters who supported Fang will have a good perspective on Brisby overall, but a lot of Fang's supporters are likely satiated now.
No.104603
Anonymous
>>104596
Chel
We need a traditional winner to get rid of the backlog, Chel is so far without controversy and she has shown to be very strong everytime she participates so very deserving
No.104604
Anonymous
Replies:>>104655
>>104603
Chel is boring and Armstrongposter is right.
No.104605
Anonymous
Replies:>>104655
>>104603
Tyr is a better choice for traditional winner unless Chel gets a campaign surge.
No.104637
Anonymous
Image:170840483558.jpg(88kB, 1204x1198)cb8fa31c30e60fdb2fc5f1a38b90f8cd1401ba94.jpeg
>>104596
I was part of Fang Gang in 2020 and 2022 and I'm going to be maining my wife ENA this year
No.104655
Anonymous
>>104603
See:
>>104604
>>104605
Chel is a coomer meme, that’s it. Tyr gets OC and has actual campaigns. Chel just exists and people vote for her based on their cocks. Maybe if Chelfags did something other than shove her up their asses she’d win.
No.104657
Anonymous
Replies:>>104688
Image:170840709440.jpg(2.19MB, 4032x3024)If Fang wins.jpeg
>>104596
I'm still around, in it for Brisby
Slappy the squirrel would also be pretty neat
No.104688
Anonymous
>>104657
Holy based
No.104700
Anonymous
Alright which one of you made this blatantly undisguised thread? https://boards.4chan.org/co/thread/142331197
No.104713
Anonymous
Image:170844303337.jpg(22kB, 644x476)Griev.jpeg
>>104700
No idea but I'm not posting there. Already tired from so many tourneys
No.104714
Anonymous
Replies:>>104724
>>104713
Okay Tabitha.
No.104716
Grimlock
>>104526
Me Grimlock want to marry genderbent Zorak.
No.104721
Anonymous
Replies:>>104724
>>104713
NSAbro btw forgot to add that part in my post
No.104724
Anonymous
>>104714
>>104721
Not that bitch but if it completes the joke for you, sure I am.
No.104750
Anonymous
"Male Disney characters are based but I will be spiting all the female one's" sentiment is a good demonstration of how fucked trying to have a normal ms. /co/ is.
No.104752
Anonymous
Image:170845977043.jpg(24kB, 400x225)episode-image.jpg
*blink* I haven't entered the thread but I may use it to host if it survives long enough after I'm done with work.
No.104757
Anonymous
Image:170846361933.jpg(413kB, 932x1028)full of uranium.jpg
>>104750
It's all just spite by this point
No.104760
Anonymous
>>104750
I think it's just to troll DTVA. I would be cool with Jessica Rabbit, Mulan, Judy, or Dominator again getting elite eight.
No.104776
Anonymous
>>104750
Disney as a whole gets spited not just the females, let's not pretend they aren't
Hell it might be spited more, there hasn't been a Disney/Pixar Mr Elite Eight character since 2020 but Ms had three since then
No.104804
Anonymous
Replies:>>104809
>>104776
Hank and Dale?
No.104806
Anonymous
Replies:>>104810
>>104776
Kronk won tho.
No.104809
Anonymous
Replies:>>104812
>>104804
acquired properties are a stretch imo, you might as well call Grievous a Disney winner too
No.104810
Anonymous
>>104806
Yeah back in 2019 before people really hated them
No.104812
Anonymous
>>104809
Grievous is a Disney winner.
No.104813
Anonymous
If we're talking brands then CN fucking dominates the /co/ tourneys.
No.104815
Anonymous
Image:170848628182.png(135kB, 1367x791)443nsa.PNG
Another non-sus NSA tournament
No.104816
Anonymous
>>104815
If this is weird then so are Zorak and Optimus
No.104817
Anonymous
>>104815
>DC
>DC
>DC
>DC
No.104820
Anonymous
Replies:>>104821
Image:170848711539.gif(762kB, 480x220)1700590052079118.gif
>>104700
>Person who barely uses commas is advocating on changing the rules of the tournaments
No.104821
Anonymous
Replies:>>104823
>>104820
NSA is a massive campoonsissy rulefag and outright refused to put it up to vote. Probably not them.
No.104823
Anonymous
>>104821
I don't believe it. Honestly from what I've seen of NSA there is a huge possibility of him just switching mentality.
No.104826
Anonymous
>>104464
This is honestly a surprise to me too, I've been pretty out of the loop since king /v/ ended.
No.104827
Anonymous
>>104823
This particular anti-E8 anon has been at it for years. I remember them.
No.104828
Anonymous
Replies:>>104832
Image:170848783434.jpg(16kB, 328x247)huh.jpg
>>104827
Years? Sure I've heard of said anon but this is the first time I've seen him this rampant. Almost reminds me of the breakdowns OFA had back in King of /v/.
No.104832
Anonymous
>>104828
They were complaining as early as like 2020, and they claim to have been complaining since 2019. I think they even went on other boards (/aco/) and complained about it.
No.104833
Anonymous
Image:170848905414.jpg(28kB, 720x565)1708199274752224.jpg
I've been participating in these tournaments since 2019 and I have legitimately never heard of this anon.
Like, yeah? I guess he said he's claimed that's he's been against E8 since 2019 but that's the thing, I know people did put the E8 to a brief question but didn't really bother go fully against it. This is the first time someone has been so adamant on being against the E8 rule.
No.104834
Anonymous
>>104827
Same, I'm surprised he's still arguing this because nobody agrees with him.
No.104837
Anonymous
Can we update the pic on Donald Duck's page? The colors look a tad... faded.
https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/Donald_Duck
No.104838
Anonymous
Replies:>>104846
>>104823
Semi-related but if NSA somehow manages to stall long enough to still be in power by the time Ms /co/ 2024 happens I expect her to make a 180 turn and start acting like campaigning is a bad thing in an attempt to divide the voterbase and keep them from booting her out.
No.104839
Anonymous
No, I’m not NSA, NSA refused to consider an E8 appeal.
Yes, I’ve been contesting this cancerous rule since 2019 during the peruvian occupation (thinking it might have stopped the Spinel fuckery).
I’m fully aware that my words fall on deaf ears, as they do every year.
No, I won’t stop until E8 is repealed.
No.104842
Anonymous
Replies:>>104847
Image:170849152196.jpg(16kB, 637x358)point and laugh.jpg
>>104839
you're a fuckin loser
No.104845
Anonymous
Replies:>>104847
>>104839
It won't
No.104846
Anonymous
Replies:>>104849
>>104838
>if NSA somehow manages to stall long enough to still be in power by the time Ms /co/ 2024 happens
Literally how at this point lol.
No.104847
Anonymous
>>104842
Yep. I’m here, aren’t I?
>>104845
Probably, but it’s worth making the argument anyway.
No.104849
Anonymous
>>104846
Hence why I said “somehow”, it would take a miracle for her to still be in power.
No.104887
Anonymous
Image:170851353382.jpg(28kB, 309x328)FAD61194-57E2-4642-ADEF-62CC7F3310AC.jpeg
Predict her placement for this year
No.104888
Anonymous
Replies:>>104891
>>104887
literally who
No.104889
Anonymous
>>104887
Round 4 again.
No.104891
Anonymous
Replies:>>104894
>>104888
Someone that's better than your main.
No.104894
Anonymous
>>104891
Impossible, no one is better than [character you hate]!
No.104910
Anonymous
https://boards.4chan.org/co/thread/142348909
*king batch voice* anotha one
No.104912
Anonymous
Replies:>>104920
Image:170852020664.jpg(22kB, 600x338)stopsign.jfif
>>104910
No.104913
Anonymous
Image:170852047533.png(11kB, 500x513)1558207317141.png
>>104910
This stealth thread is so dogshit I wouldn't be surprised if it just became a regular DC thread instead
No.104915
Anonymous
>>104910
Remember dorks, 1 stealth thread a month or you’re becoming obnoxious and risking shit
No.104920
Anonymous
Replies:>>104927
>>104912
*YTP Robotnik voice* NO!
No.104927
Anonymous
Replies:>>104931
>>104920
>Citing JOBotnik
See?
No.104931
Anonymous
Replies:>>104932
>>104927
What color is my pingas?
No.104932
Anonymous
No.104966
Anonymous
Image:170855313426.gif(2.97MB, 480x348)1704142728621097.gif
>MD fags begin their persecution complex again
>People watch the first episode just to calm them down because that's how you watch any show, from the beginning
>MD fags say it sucks
>People that watch it hate it, ask what's the point in watching further
>MD fags insult them and tell them "Well yeah, the first episode SUCKS but the show is totally better you retard"
>it backfires horribly and anons point out how stupid that is, leading to even more people disliking the show and the fanbase
No.104968
Anonymous
>>104966
Nbros... Uzibros... Cynbros... Are we truly SHIT and FINISHED?
No.104969
Anonymous
>>104966
You're right, Amphibia is a much better show because it has a better pilot.
No.104972
Anonymous
Replies:>>104973
>>104966
Should've just told them to start with the second episode.
No.104973
Anonymous
Image:170855517009.gif(577kB, 380x268)I get it.gif
>>104972
I can't imagine what possibly changes in the second episode to get me to like it. I legitimately didn't like anything from the pilot. The robot designs are stupid, the setting is stupid, the characters are awful, the premise of robots eating robots is stupid.
No.104979
Anonymous
Replies:>>104983
>>104966
Didn’t a few anon’s watch the next few episodes and still thought it sucked?
No.104983
Anonymous
Image:170855880633.png(6kB, 390x470)1668231624476491.png
>>104979
Yes
Fuck it, I might see episode 2 just so if they cope again, I can claim with accuracy why it's garbage
I mean, I thought Tears of the Kingdom was terrible 15 hours in, so to truly cement my opinion I beat all five dungeons and the final boss
No.104987
Anonymous
Replies:>>104988
>>104966
There is early-installment weirdness, but I never watched Murder Drones, so I couldn't tell you how much it really changes. The series you posted went through a lot of changes too, like Porky being the star before Bugs or Daffy existed and Daffy going from wacky to arrogant. However, these changes took years to happen, and I don't think they were actually bad before getting changed either.
No.104988
Anonymous
Replies:>>104991
>>104987
you're responding to bait
No.104989
Anonymous
>only allowed to vote for someone if they have a good pilot
No.104990
Anonymous
Replies:>>105005
>>104989
I will spitevote against any show that doesn't have a good pilot. If you can't make the most important episode of a show good then why bother?
No.104991
Anonymous
Replies:>>104992
>>104988
You do realize not every single piece of criticism levied at a cartoon is bait right?
No.104992
Anonymous
Replies:>>105100
>>104991
bait or retarded, better off ignored either way
No.104997
Anonymous
Replies:>>105001
>>104966
I'm kinda tempted to watch it because of that and because I'm still surprised it's from someone who made Mario 64 Blooper videos a decade ago
No.104998
Anonymous
Image:170856761039.jpg(193kB, 1920x1080)GG3uZs4XEAApVm_.jpg
The Epic Mickey remaster got surprisingly announced today for later this year and I can see two tournament results occuring
1. Mickey actually qualifies, people don't realize how close he gets to the top 128 (last year off the pack by 4 votes) and being in something cool and well received like this will push him over the line.
2. Oswald makes a deeper run. Epic Mickey is the storyline and characterization that gave him that many fans in the first place and people are going to be reminded of or introduced to it. Last year he was against a 4th seed with strong FOTM vibes and had the first instance of a particular falseflag yet still only lost by 4%. He's been undervalued as a contestant and while it might not mean Elite 8 I can easily see him making round 3
No.104999
Anonymous
Image:170856774350.jpg(187kB, 1920x1080)3h2nv.jpg
>>104989
How about y'all post some good pilots will ya?
Preview - The Pilotyoutube thumb
No.105000
Anonymous
>>104999
DYNAMITE!
DYNAMITE!
No.105001
Anonymous
Replies:>>105003
>>104997
the mario guys just own the studio, the series is made by liam vickers. same guy who did cliffside and internecion cube.
No.105002
Anonymous
>tfw your mains' show only has a pilot and nothing else
No.105003
Anonymous
>>105001
Oh okay, that makes more sense then.
No.105005
Anonymous
Replies:>>105006
>>104990
To be fair to Dronefags, most pilots kinda suck in retrospect because they usually don't reflect what the overall show ended up being and its appeal. If someone's favorite episode of their show is the pilot they're 100% in some ways dissatisfied with the ultimate direction of the show so they might not even like the actual show at the end of the day.
No.105006
Anonymous
>>105005
There might be two things really working against it here.

1. The show only has a few real episodes to it, meaning that there's far less there to bury the pilot's pitfalls.
2. TADC pilot happened, and while that has its own room for improvement it seems to have clearly resonated with general viewers better.
No.105018
Anonymous
Image:170857624049.gif(81kB, 510x510)1674334262533878.gif
I will watch episode 2 and if it still is shit I will never let any pityfagging or argumentative MD faggots live it down
No.105019
Anonymous
Replies:>>105033
>>105018
Better make sure to tell us what you think when you're done.
No.105020
Anonymous
Image:170857670541.png(37kB, 477x337)yeah okay.PNG
>>105018
No.105021
Anonymous
>>104989
>>104999
Speaking of which, Boondocks pilot was found recently
The Boondocks Unaired TV Pilot (2003)youtube thumb
No.105027
Anonymous
>>105018
You won't like it.
No.105028
Anonymous
>>105018
Why hampter shooting
No.105033
Anonymous
Image:170857948263.gif(723kB, 240x240)1694542013270200.gif
>>105019
Alright, I watched it. Here's my thoughts, since you asked. It WAS better. I wasn't ACTIVELY loathing the time I spent watching it, like the pilot.
Does that make it good? Hell no.
Uzi's character is "I am... Le cunt" and N is "I am... Le inappropriately optimistic and stupid". Humor is still the exact same awful humor style from the pilot of "Random" and "Stupid" likes it's the exaggerated version of Rick and Morty people criticize Rick and Morty for being. (That show is shit too by the way, still better than Murder Drones) And it's too the point it sabotages the edgy, semi-serious setting, unlike R&M which is at least openly retarded. It feels like every joke are the awful Latter-era Puck jokes from Berserk where you can have a what's meant to be tense moment, with some little shit making a bad star Wars or Doraemon joke. But except instead of a little chestnut scribble that can be easily ignored and is at least ocassionally funny, the "quirky" humor overtakes the entire scene and is never funny. Is Uzi's "Bite me" supposed to be endearing, or cool, or funny? Because it's none of those, it's grating and tryhard in the same way most holocaust references to garner sympathy just feel cheap.
Sad part is, the setting HAS potential. Some of the uses of shadow in Episode 2 with robot tentacles were nice, from a cinematography standpoint. But I hate Uzi, and I hate N. There's no getting around that. I don't like any character I've seen, but I REALLY don't like them. Pilot from E2 goes from comically bad, to just pointlessly bad. Like going from the Lady Gaga Simpsons episode to yet another Zombie Simpsons episode.
There's nothing worth my time, and the fact that the CHARACTERS were my least favorite part of what's supposed to appeal to me in a CHARACTER tournament just totally has me turned off.
Sorry MD fags, I tried. MAYBE if you go against some especially obnoxious DTVA or Calarts slop I MIGHT vote for you, but that's legitimately it. I don't know what the fuck you see in this absolute garbage to constantly have a bump limit discussion thread up on /co/ about. Get some better fucking taste or at least use of your time. I got more action, humor, and entertainment talking with a boomer at a flea market today about coin grading services. Not coins themselves mind you. Companies that put coins in little plastic boxes with grades, like trading cards or comic books to tell you it's a coin. That was better than your entire franchise. Fuck you.
No.105034
Anonymous
Replies:>>105056
>>105033
>what do you see in this
They’re autistic. The whole show is designed to appeal to autists. The sameface characters, the random humor, the edgy setting that conflicts with the humor. It’s all autism bait. Which allows the obsession and dedication for constant bump limit threads at all times.

I’m so glad they’re round 1 fodder. I’ll never ever feel bad for them.
No.105035
Anonymous
>>105033
Hoo boy, and since most people here already seem to not like MD that isn't a good sign for them, gonna have to hope these tournaments stick around long enough that zoomer fans make up the majority of the voterbase, they're unlikely to do well as is.
No.105037
Anonymous
Remember how that MDfag was the OP for the first bunch of our Ms /co/ discussion threads and kept making Uzi the OP image? They were so adamant that they were the front runners. It’s really funny in hindsight
No.105042
Anonymous
Replies:>>105046
>>105033
Don't worry, it gets even better. You should watch episode 3 now and give your thoughts on that!
No.105043
Anonymous
Replies:>>105045
I'm telling you, there needs to be a nu-toon alliance.
No.105045
Anonymous
Replies:>>105048
>>105043
Just like there needs to be a DTVA alliance?
No.105046
Anonymous
Image:170858143842.gif(1.16MB, 400x268)GIVE IT UP FOR.gif
>>105042
Lmao
I know you're likely joking, but I wonder how many of them are going to keep moving the goalposts with cope after several people hated the pilot and they said "Well the pilot is BAD but it gets better assholes, fuck you"
>Well did you watch EVERY episode
>Okay well did you rewatch them
>Well how about cockmongler's two hour video essay on it
>Then did you draw porn of the robots
>What about gay and bisexual porn of the robots
>And fly out to the studio to suck the production staff's dicks
>Ha! Guess you didn't get the full Murder drones experience then kiddo. Looks like you can't REALLY hate it
No.105047
Anonymous
gonna vote for Squidward this time
No.105048
Anonymous
No.105049
Anonymous
Image:170858195474.jpg(88kB, 1125x292)CD1BC7F2-4B31-4ECF-A0A9-2CE7E658DC02.jpeg
>looking at desuarchive for Ms 2022 threads
>see that there’s a meta reply to Fang’s nomination
>it’s this
Wow some people were really mad about her, huh
No.105050
Anonymous
>>104989
What if their respective show doesn't have a pilot per se (at least, one available to the public), will the first episode do?
No.105051
Anonymous
Image:170858199180.jpg(90kB, 1280x1043)Mr KEKbs.jpg
>SHITward LOST
No.105052
Anonymous
>anti-MDfag was the annoying Krabsspammer the whole time
No.105053
Anonymous
>>105052
>Schizo headcanon theory
No.105054
Anonymous
>>105053
>literally posted Krabs while complaining about Murder Drones.
Okay schizo.
No.105055
Anonymous
Replies:>>105062
>>105054
>He thinks there's only one CHADbsbro in these threads
No.105056
Anonymous
Image:170858242066.jpg(94kB, 600x600)1661449698051488.jpg
>>105034
I'm literally a case study in my state for Autism. Like, prolific to the point you could potentially dox me just by knowing what part of the country I'm from. Murder drones sucks balls.
No.105057
Anonymous
>>105052
>only one person can hate murderdrones!
Sad to see you’re still trying this shit
No.105058
Anonymous
>>105056
Holy shit he posted a Spongebob image while criticizing MD he must be the only person responsible for Mr Krabs funposting!
No.105059
Anonymous
Replies:>>105060
>>105056
You're just clearly not autistic enough. These MDfags are unfathomably autistic. Of all the round 1 fodder, this is clearly the worst and I'm so happy they'll never get any further.
No.105060
Anonymous
Replies:>>105067
>>105059
They are not necessarily autistic, they are just a bunch of kids.
No.105061
Anonymous
Replies:>>105065
I wonder what the next excuse from the MDfags will be.
>The Venture Bros. had an awful first few episodes too guys
No.105062
Anonymous
Image:170858366330.jpg(657kB, 959x2609)the mighty score.jpg
>>105052
>>105053
>>105054
>>105055
Who cares? THIS should be the main topic. Remember this means Bejita is also 3-0 against your favorite character.
No.105063
Anonymous
Image:170858369532.png(227kB, 457x429)1692934766781.png
>>105033
Nfag's not gonna like this.
No.105064
Anonymous
Image:170858382495.png(408kB, 1096x1493)Bejita cry.png
>Who cares? THIS should be the main topic. Remember this means Bejita is also 3-0 against your favorite character.
No.105065
Anonymous
>>105061
Not true. Speedy was so close to getting his wings.
No.105066
Anonymous
I’m glad we moved on from the “but they were so wholesome and passionate!” Bullshit about MDfags
No.105067
Anonymous
>>105060
Even worse. They're autistic children.
No.105068
Anonymous
>>105066
I blame that one Nfag with his constant spiteful meta whining for almost single-handedly turning the goodwill towards them (or at least being the catalyst).
No.105069
Anonymous
>>105066
It had to be settled. It's shit.
No.105070
Anonymous
Image:170858580567.jpg(276kB, 1220x959)My HERO.jpg
Don't worry, this guy will come in and help SAVE the tournaments once and for all.
No.105071
Anonymous
Replies:>>105074
>>105070
>Literally left with no one to vote for
No.105072
Anonymous
Replies:>>105073
>this guy
You mean Vince?
No.105073
Anonymous
>>105072
his opinions are forever invalid now that boxing won before wrestling
No.105074
Anonymous
>>105070
>>105071
Seems like a very roundabout way of saying he supports Tyr'ahnee.
No.105077
Anonymous
Image:170858815831.png(2.92MB, 1920x1080)zv0b09.png
>>105074
A very spiteful human doesn't speak for us!
No.105078
Anonymous
>>105074
Damn he's even more based than we thought...
No.105093
Anonymous
Replies:>>105097
Image:170859427616.jpg(49kB, 959x539)Dronerooms.jpg
>>105033
Step aside, "Murder Drones". It's time for the better Drone to win.
No.105097
Anonymous
Replies:>>105099
>>105093
>a literal who
No.105099
Anonymous
>>105097
>not knowing the Drones
No.105100
Anonymous
>after months of raging about MD on 4chan dinofag decided to spread his wings and do his tirades on /tnt/ too
Its so tiring, this schizo just doesnt give up.
>>104992
Its definetly all bait, all the signs are there.
No.105101
Anonymous
Replies:>>105102
You guys are honestly retarded.
No.105102
Anonymous
Image:170859699357.png(936kB, 644x644)WDYTWA.png
>>105101
No.105105
Anonymous
>>105100
>>dinofag decided to spread his wings and do his tirades on /tnt/ too
Or, better yet, many of us find you to be obnoxious autists and are just venting our frustration with your ridiculous fanatism and victim complex.
No.105106
Anonymous
>Nfag is seeing his perceived nemesis in everyone
No.105107
Anonymous
>dinofag decided to samefag even harder because it's easier to do it on /tnt/ and thought we wouldn't notice
No.105108
Anonymous
>>105107
Holy shit you might actually have a double digit IQ.
No.105109
Anonymous
Replies:>>105149
>>105100
>>105107
do not feed the trolls
No.105117
Anonymous
Image:170861646727.png(236kB, 640x480)vlcsnap-2024-02-22-16h35m33s655.png
Mr. Judge I would like to respectfully suggest that you put an asterisk next to Wuya's name in the win book, and that asterisk should read "this win was obtained by means of fraud and bad sportsmanship". Thank you
No.105124
Anonymous
Replies:>>105139
>>105074
He explicitly said 'no furries'
No.105139
Anonymous
Replies:>>105140
>>105124
Yeah, so he supports Tyr'ahnee.
No.105140
Anonymous
>>105139
isn't she anthro
No.105141
Anonymous
>>105140
Of what animal?
No.105142
Anonymous
Acting like anyone who makes criticisms against your series is the same person only makes you look like a desperate idiot.
No.105144
Anonymous
>>105140
Tyr is a xeno.
No.105145
Anonymous
The biggest what if for all tournaments is if the Peru Facebook was caught during Spinel’s tourunament and not during the following year’s tournament.
Would Spinel have been disqualified? Would RC have stopped directing the Facebook users to the polls when exposed? Would Spinel have lost enough votes to lose with the Facebook gone? How would the hosts have handled it? And most of all would this have changed the culture and winners of Ms /co/ to be less chaotic and messed up?
No.105146
Anonymous
>>105107
>he actually believes one person doesn’t like a group of obnoxious autists
No.105147
Anonymous
>>105145
Assuming the host didn't disqualify her, Spinel would have still won the tournament.
No.105148
Anonymous
>>105145
It's hard to tell if she'd be DQ'd. The host at the time seemed lenient and liable to crack under pressure. He even spoke with the thread telling everyone he just watched SU and thought Spinel was fine and all. He may have just quit the moment the brigading was revealed cause it'd be too much shit from the threads (which were at any point already terrible). Stats didn't want to DQ a character for the same thing (see Emmy in 2020), but this was a much bigger deal than Emmy so who knows. If Spinel wasn't DQ'd mid-tourney it'd make the threads unbearable and possibly stop the tourney for good.
Another quandary is if she wasn't brigaded by FB at all. How much of her votes were actually FB? Easiest assumption is the extra several hundred votes around the last round. I do think Spiel was legit power-housing her way through most opponents. It was perfect FOTM timing and she was hijacking the board in a way not seen since ponies. Add on the troll, spite, and general humor train that came with her and she was probably a real E8. Her first almost definite organic loss was Frankie in semi's. Finale was probably meant to be Frankie vs. Raven which would be the traditional early year heavy hitter finale. This obviously would have changed the whole course of Ms.
No.105149
Anonymous
Replies:>>105154
>>105109
I know, but its still worth letting anons know the cause of anti MD posts. He's been doing this constantly on /co/ since 2023 Ms., guess took him enough to reach /tnt/ too
No.105150
Anonymous
Replies:>>105151
Image:170862622524.jpg(177kB, 1242x691)IMG_0269.jpeg
I THINK MURDER DRONES SUCKS!
No.105151
Anonymous
>>105150
is TFR the reason why Fred has a presence in Mr. /co/lympus?
No.105154
Anonymous
Replies:>>105176
>>105149
well also, i don't think this guy is dinofag. there can be more than one dipshit with an obvious chip on their shoulder, it doesn't make them any less of a dipshit.
whatever the case, it's better to ignore the retards. let them stew in their own autism.
No.105158
Anonymous
Image:170863126355.jpg(140kB, 640x426)1708622418076376.jpg
I encourage more anons to watch the first two episodes so they'll hate it too and it'll be impossible for everybody that dislikes it to be the same couple of people. The goalpost moving I've seen is unreal. All within what, 48 hours?
>you hate it because you didn't see it
>okay well the first episode sucks, you'll like the second one
>okay so you hated the second one, you must be Krabs/Dinofag/some third agenda
No.105159
Anonymous
Replies:>>105230
>>105158
This has actually encouraged me to watch it too. Will report later.
No.105167
Anonymous
TELL ME ABOUT MR KRABS WHY DOES HE HATE THE MURDER DRONES!?!?
No.105168
Anonymous
>>105167
Because anon posted a Krabs reaction image, which means that the character itself now despises Murder Drones more than anything else ever.
No.105169
Anonymous
>>105158
Yeah, sure, I'll give it a fair shot.
No.105176
Anonymous
>>105154
>MDfags trying to call anyone else autistic
There’s an irony to this that you’re too retarded to comprehend
No.105178
Anonymous
Image:170863881391.jpg(34kB, 512x512)CC088E12-BF20-4FB2-BCE2-E6E69F0B5599.jpeg
>>105158
Count me in sir.
Already watched the first episode and will be going for the entire series.
No.105195
Anonymous
It's making sense the corporation worshipping cattle are trying to trash on a fully independent production, they are scared of individuals taking ownership of their creations
No.105196
Anonymous
Image:170864285951.jpg(38kB, 1280x720)plane.jpg
>>105167
Perhaps he is wondering why someone would coom to a character without even watching the show they came from.
No.105200
Anonymous
>>105195
ebin falseflag
No.105202
Anonymous
Replies:>>105203
>>105195
Just make good toons bro.
No.105203
Anonymous
>>105202
You can't name a single good zoomer toon (because it doesn't exist, zoomers are incapable of making good art).
No.105205
Anonymous
Replies:>>105206
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/103334973/
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/103338874/
Man look how old and disorganized the first Mr /co/ tournament threads were. Ignoring the hostfag trying to rig it was a very comfy time, just really odd to see how slow and weird the infant stages of tournaments were compared to how they eventually grew into how they are now
No.105206
Anonymous
Replies:>>105214
Image:170864428102.png(64kB, 1295x319)host_nomination.png
>>105205
lol
No.105212
Anonymous
Image:170865309120.jpg(58kB, 780x438)JERRY.jpg
"What's the deal with Murder Drones? I mean, you think they're there to kill humans, but the humans are already extinct by the time they get there, so what are they supposed to do, murder other robots?"
No.105214
Anonymous
>>105206
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/103372026/#103372026
Looking through these threads are so weird now knowing everything that came after
No.105215
Anonymous
Replies:>>105229
Video:170865506526.mp4(327kB / 0:00:03 / avc1, 1280x720)Whatever.mp4
*blink* New video reaction dropped.
No.105216
Anonymous
Image:170865521117.jpg(470kB, 1444x1074)200721-MB54_1.jpg
So, Wile E.'s a lock for this year, right? This whole fiasco has been better advertising for him as a contestant than if WB had just released the movie and not done anything stupid.
No.105217
Anonymous
Replies:>>105225
>>105216
His campaign would be incredibly funny if people make him talk with the signs and the creative traps he could set for his opponents.
No.105220
Anonymous
>>105216
To win? Absolutely not, especially with Daffy back. Elite Eight? I could see it if he gets an actual campaign behind him. Out of the remaining Looney Tunes to make it, he’s one of the most fun options.
No.105221
Anonymous
Image:170865892910.jpg(7kB, 225x225)hit what.jpg
>>105216
Not entirely. Wile is likely on the bracket but nowhere near a lock for that. That being because the male Looney Tunes track is among the hardest series to qualify from with 3 character limit for any /co/ tournament (oddly enough various /v/ franchises are far harder though even before the 2 rule). What makes it especially tough is Bugs and Daffy always are locks to qualify no matter what and both are eligible this year. Leaving one Looney Tunes slot open for a whole sleuth of higher-ranking guys. Marvin especially will be the issue.

There's been rumors that Looney Tunes might be added to the character limit exception rule since it's hard to classify, and if Looney Tunes is allowed more then 3 characters Wile is a lock. If not, Wile is going to be fighting hard against Marvin for that final slot since Bugs and Daffy will be way too high seeded to overtake. Which Wile has qualified three times already and is the definite 4th place Looney Tunes male even before the cancellation so he'll have a fighting chance, but Marvin has always placed higher then him. Cancellation pity votes couldn't get Pepe in even with Daffy out that year, there's no lock in pity votes getting Wile above Marvin to qualify.
No.105222
Anonymous
Image:170865895554.jpg(52kB, 691x377)SPAAAAAAAAACEEEEE.jpg
I feel bad for Judyanon last time we met in that thread and having to miss tag-team. I know what it's to be busy especially with work and family.
No.105225
Anonymous
>>105217
That could be a REALLY fun change of pace. We're terribly overdue for a Warner Bros. winner considering they're THE cartoons of the golden age of animation. But series limit might screw him over, Bugs and Daffy are guaranteed slot fillers and Daffy tends to do stuff.
No.105227
Anonymous
>>105225
Do you mean Looney Tunes winner? Because Johnny, Tom and Zorak are all Warner Bros.
No.105228
Anonymous
>>105225
I’d take Wile over Marvin.
No.105229
Anonymous
>>105215
Is that Tom Kenny as Zorak?
No.105230
Anonymous
>>105158
>>105159
Watched the first two eps. as well and it's kind of... whatever?
I like the style, how the expressions of the bots faces work, and the general visual fluidity, though the action scenes become debatable.
The humor is overbearing and terribly unfunny. The character archetypes and plot setup are pretty by-the-numbers. N is almost unbearably too much a soinut fag and I'm not surprised his fans are the faggiest. Uzi's catchprashe they want to wear to death just ain't endearing. You got the /deepest-lore/ hints which is something I guess, though with how the show seems structured they're gonna have development every ep. instead of episodic spacing with occasional lore bombs (like SU, DTVA or whatever), so I feel like having high-quality start is more crucial and more reflective of how the rest will be.
Overall like a 5/10. I don't hate it but I'm not very motivated to watch more. I could see maybe why it gets so much autism and I probably something I'd have liked a lot more as a young teen. Though if we're comparing zoomer autist staples and my level of respect I'd put it like a tier or two below Hazbin and Owlphibia right now. Above loud house if that's worth anything.
No.105231
Anonymous
>>105230
I've seen cartel murders more appealing than the loud house and its fandom.
Pretty fair review of the show.
No.105232
Anonymous
>/tnt/ likes murderdrones less and less the more they watch it
Wow the pleas to watch it backfired pretty hard.
>>105230
I agree with this. I get how teens would like it which makes me wonder how much of the fanbase on /co/ is underaged. Maybe they’re all just mentally stunted adults idk.
No.105233
Anonymous
>>105230
Hazbin and Owlphibia bros we just can't stop winning.
No.105234
Anonymous
Going off the Golden Age discussion, it might be fun to go over each winner's debut year and original companies.

Mr. /co/lympus has a pretty solid spread overall:
>Johnny Bravo - 1995/1997, Warner Bros / Hanna-Barbera / Cartoon Network Studios
>Kronk - 2000, Disney
>Tom - 1940, MGM
>Grievous - 2003, Lucasfilm / Cartoon Network Studios
>Zorak - 1966/1994, Hanna-Barbera
>Skeletor - 1983, Mattel / Filmation
There is some bias towards the late 90s to early 2000s, but there's still a decent range here. Shockingly, there's also decent creator variety here despite how much most of these changed hands over the years. (Hanna-Barbera alone is tied into half of these, including Tom.)

Ms. /co/ on the other hand has an interesting bias thus far:
>Jenny - 2003, Nickelodeon / Frederator
>Spinel - 2019, Warner Bros / Cartoon Network Studios
>Monarch - 2003, Warner Bros / Astro Base GO! / NoodleSoup Productions
>Betty Boop - 1930, Paramount / Fleischer
>Fang - 2019, Warner Bros / Cartoon Network Studios / Williams Street
>Wuya - 2003, Warner Bros Animation
Somehow, everyone but Betty is from one of two debut years. There's also the obvious matter that everyone other than Jenny and Betty were Warner Bros creations in some fashion from their inceptions. To add to it, most of the runner-ups would have still not changed this streak. 2003 was a huge year for animation, huh?
No.105237
Anonymous
>>105234
Just a very clear generational bias based on the boards demographic. It's long been pointed out how basically what aired in the 2000's is the strongest preference.
No.105238
Anonymous
>>105234
Not really. It just means that 2003 is the most fondly remembered year by the nostalgia-blinded millennial and zillenial types that makes up the majority of the /co/ voters.
No.105239
Anonymous
Replies:>>105263
>>105237
>>105238
Oh yeah, there's definitely a lot of nostalgia at play here. Even Mr. /co/ displays that fairly well. I was just more specifying on 2003 in particular for Ms. /co/, since it's only one year in a prime range that might as well encompass over a decade of time. To elaborate on my last point, Teen Titans and Duck Dodgers also both debuted that year. That alone is half the finalists covered right there.
No.105250
Anonymous
>>105230
yeah it's definitely not for everyone. thanks for giving it a shot though.
No.105251
Anonymous
>>105234
/co/ tournaments are known for a very heavy Warner Bros bias since that was the edgier alternative animation company. That’s why over 12 tournaments at most only four winners have no connection to Warner Bros (potentially even only three is you say Skeletor was helped by the early 2000s show on Cartoon Network)
And don’t get into how many elite 8s are Warner Bros
No.105252
Anonymous
Replies:>>105254
>/co/ tournaments are known for a very heavy Warner Bros bias since that was the edgier alternative animation company
Don't know if /v/ retardation or DTVA warmongering.
No.105254
Anonymous
Replies:>>105259
>>105252
9/12 winners are associated with Warner Bros/CN/AS
9/12 2nd place finalists are associated with Warner Bros/CN/AS
It’s pretty well known /co/ has a preference for content from those channels
No.105256
Anonymous
>It’s pretty well known /co/ has a preference for content from those channels
Don't know if /v/ retardation or DTVA warmongering.
No.105257
Anonymous
>>105238
Just because a show came out in 2003 doesn't mean everyone watched it in 2003, it's a whole time period.
No.105258
Anonymous
Image:170870857896.jpg(113kB, 1280x720)pixelamphibia.jpg
Warmongering DT/v/A retardation.
No.105259
Anonymous
>>105254
Most of the /co/ roster and champions is Warner Bros adjacent because Warner Bros happens to be the company that owns a majority of American animated TV productions. I can assure you it has absolutely nothing to do with company fanatism or bias, as your post seemed to imply.
No.105261
Anonymous
Replies:>>105262
>>105230
>below Hazbin
Retard detected, nothing is worse than Viv's shit cartoons.
No.105262
Anonymous
Replies:>>105301
>>105261
Then why did it win two tournaments?
No.105263
Anonymous
Image:170871416991.jpg(329kB, 1921x2222)1601172447253.jpg
>>105237
>>105239
Mr. /co/ is the biggest nostalgia wank tournament by a sizeable margin. Someone pointed it out during the last event that the newest character to ever make Elite 8 is Wall-e, who's movie came out in 2008. It's crazy to think that not a single cartoon guy from the last 16 years of animation has made it that far. Every other tournament has seen new characters (as in debuted within the past 5 years) reach top 8 or even win.
No.105265
Anonymous
Replies:>>105267
>>105263
Again worth noting /v/ seems more welcoming of newer characters, or characters associated with newer media at least. Makes me wonder how /a/ would take it. Years ago I'd have said they'd be the most staunchly oldfag, but now I'm not so sure.
No.105266
Anonymous
>>105263
Name something from 2020s that would be worthy of entering the E8 (aside from spear).
Not to sound condescending or offensive, actually just good-intended curiosity.
No.105267
Anonymous
Replies:>>105271
>>105265
Depends on how many years ago.
There's been so many shows over the years that seem to stay around in people's subconscious. Seasonsal shit has its place, but you'd definitely get one-time stuff like K-on competing with older stuff like Rozen Maiden very often.
I think /a/'s deal will not necessarily be nostalgia but pretty much board culture stuff.
No.105269
Anonymous
Replies:>>105272
>>105266
2020s only has Spear so far but 2010s has characters that would work
You can’t tell me Wander characters or OTGW characters wouldn’t be worthy of an E8 slot, and there’s probably more then that
No.105271
Anonymous
>>105267
I wouldn't really call K-on new at this point. I'd say new as anything post-KLK since that was basically the last show to get universal positive engagement across the spectrum (or at least since I browsed there some years ago).
No.105272
Anonymous
>>105266
>>105269
Primal premiered in 2019
No.105273
Anonymous
>>105266
I don't know if I'd really count Primal since anything Genndy would make is honorary millennial. Better phrased which 2020 zoomer generational thing is worthy of entering E8.
I would make an unironic case for the calamity frog girls. All the most rounded and popular characters to come out of loretoons on /co/.
>Amphibia premiered 2019
Nevermind.
No.105277
Anonymous
Replies:>>105280
Bejita betrayed me
No.105279
Anonymous
Replies:>>105280
Goku betrayed me...
No.105280
Anonymous
>>105277
>>105279
my HEROES have trapped the 2020 and late 2010 jobbers
No.105281
Anonymous
Tranny Meme Circus is about to be the next Murder Drones for this tournaments
No.105284
Anonymous
Replies:>>105286
>>105281
Literally same studio.
No.105285
Anonymous
Image:170872225140.jpg(44kB, 563x694)F9KisVAXQAAjrqv.jpg
>>105281
glitch won
goose won
the sharty lost
No.105286
Anonymous
>>105284
What the fuck. Not as many big zoomer creators as I thought.
No.105287
Anonymous
Replies:>>105289
we're probably going to be seeing a lot of karen dress art come next ms. /co/
No.105288
Anonymous
>>105286
Also
>MD pilot = 38M
>Circus pilot = 271M
damn
No.105289
Anonymous
>>105287
Eh, it feels like an FOTM trend.
No.105291
Anonymous
>>105281
Digital circus was definitely much better than Murder drones. I'm not by any means invested in digital circus, but I didn't outright dislike it like MD.
No.105292
Anonymous
Happy ENA day
ENA Day 2024youtube thumb
No.105293
Anonymous
>>105292
>more indie zoomer slop
No.105294
Anonymous
>>105292
Dream BBQ never ever
No.105297
Anonymous
Replies:>>105298
>>105286
It's only the beginning.
>>105292
We should enter her in /cov/ with Madotsuki.
No.105298
Anonymous
>>105292
>Dream BBQ being split into multiple parts
Interesting decision. Not sure if I like it or not, but at least it raises odds of us finally getting something this year.

>>105297
ENA and Mado actually would be a fun team thinking about it. I'm down.
No.105301
Anonymous
Replies:>>105306
>>105262
Because they're both /tnt/ side tournaments and you know this board is obsessed with campaigning.
No.105306
Anonymous
>>105301
Ackshually Ms. /aco/ 2023 wasn't held on /tnt/, check your facts before you make a statement
No.105310
Anonymous
Replies:>>105311
Image:170872898204.jpg(78kB, 859x1024)1615919150588.jpg
>>105292
My beautiful wife ENA on her very own special day... no matter what she'll always be Ms. /co/ in my heart!
No.105311
Anonymous
Replies:>>105313
Image:170872923625.jpg(82kB, 512x512)1654481270825.jpg
>>105310
>t.
No.105313
Anonymous
Replies:>>105314
>>105311
but he's with his bro Dale Gribble
No.105314
Anonymous
>>105313
there is room in his heart for two men
No.105315
Anonymous
>>105314
Bejjitabro btw
No.105316
Anonymous
>>105314
>ENA
>man
No.105317
Anonymous
>>105314
This is true and correct.
No.105318
Anonymous
>>105317
... in bizarro world.
No.105319
Anonymous
>>105317
t. Propanefag
No.105320
Anonymous
>>105314
I can't believe Dale is Double Gay
No.105321
Anonymous
>>105320
Daleble Gaybble
No.105322
Anonymous
Replies:>>105323
Image:170873521265.png(356kB, 700x522)bromance.png
>>105320
I mean...
No.105323
Anonymous
Replies:>>105324
>>105322
Chad 4TH PLACE team, unlike that 8TH PLACE ENA pairing.
No.105324
Anonymous
>>105323
how far would an Xavier/ENA/Dale trio go if /co/ trios become a thing?
No.105325
Anonymous
Replies:>>105332
>>105324
Job early on after running into my SILENT HEROES, the Eds.
No.105328
Anonymous
>>105324
If you can figure out a funny way to have Dale and ENA interact, that trio has a good shot at elite eight. A trios tournament would likely be mostly canon trios due to the greater difficulty of trying to handle three characters at once and people trying to avoid an awkward canon pair and third wheel. A team that could successfully manage three characters from three different series at once would instantly stand out. 
No.105329
Anonymous
>>105324
I'd think the first trios would be pure canon trios going far with one complete random oddball, and that would have to be the full Plunderers lineup
No.105330
Anonymous
>>105329
It'd be scary to have a /co/ trio considering that the Plunderers would then be at full force.
No.105331
Anonymous
>>105329
>>105330
>implying it won't get spitevoted out immediately due to Zorak already winning
No.105332
Anonymous
>>105325
The actual SILENTHEROES would be Mr. Incredible, Elastigirl, and Frozone.
No.105333
Anonymous
>>105329
>>105330
>lose R3
>lose R1
>still think they would be some epic unstoppable force
No.105334
Anonymous
Replies:>>105336
Image:170874020507.jpg(26kB, 750x561)dale.jpg
>I know what the problem with that girl is. She's not hearing voices, she's hearing waves. Radio waves. The government is beaming radio waves into her head to make her vegan.
>You know what vegans do? They spend a lot of money on food they don't need. More money spent on food means less money for your bunker. Which means no bunker. And no bunker means you're a sitting duck once the mothership arrives and Earth is plunged into an interplanetary war.
No.105335
Anonymous
Replies:>>105340
>>105333
They lost to the champions
No.105336
Anonymous
No.105337
Anonymous
Replies:>>105338
Coyote vs Acme got written off bros time to rev up the campaigns
No.105338
Anonymous
>>105337
oh god not another pity winner
No.105339
Anonymous
Replies:>>105340
>>105329
>Lost R1 just a while back
>Still thinks they'd be a powerhouse
No.105340
Anonymous
No.105341
Anonymous
Replies:>>105367
Image:170874203921.jpg(224kB, 695x793)Moon knight.jpg
>>105329
Place him
No.105342
Anonymous
Replies:>>105345
the plunderers are kinda shit and finished nowadays but if they played it like an old band reuniting for one last gig i think a trio run could be really charming and memorable
No.105343
Anonymous
Image:170874241504.jpg(87kB, 722x546)Me and the boys.jfif
>>105329
>>105330
>canon
*blink* In case the Plunderers doesn't work there's always the second option
No.105344
Anonymous
If trios ever happened it would be such a lame duck tourney since we know Ed Edd n Eddy would be the runaway winners
There'd be a few other challengers though I doubt they could get close to a definite early 2000s CN trio. Powerpuff Girls, Warner Siblings, Three Caballeros, Totally Spies would be contenders. Then probably a few other trios like the Spongebob or Shrek gang and one or two absolute meme pairings from different series.
No.105345
Anonymous
>>105342
>shit and finished
>their loss in Tag-Team affected the eventual winners
No.105346
Anonymous
Replies:>>105359
>>105344
This. The Eds absolutely deserve it, but it means you'd either have to vote against them BECAUSE they seem too obvious or give the tournament a second year afterwards. I'm not sure if it would be worth doing more than once anyways.
No.105347
Anonymous
plunderer's more like the coper's
No.105348
Anonymous
Replies:>>105350
>>105344
>>105344
I'd have no problems with the Ed's winning it even if it was "obvious". It'd be a fitting prize and consolation for never making E8 despite being the MC's of probably the most universally acclaimed show in /co/.
No.105349
Anonymous
Image:170874641450.png(1.81MB, 1920x1080)48rl8w.png
>everyone dunking on the plunderers
Martians won
No.105350
Anonymous
>>105348
Agreed. I wouldn't mind it if they are the winners that kickstart the annual tournament and I wouldn't guarantee their win even with that.
No.105351
Anonymous
Image:170874703328.jpg(61kB, 552x414)Oh dear god.jpg
No.105352
Anonymous
>Trio happens
>Eds voted out R1 due to them being the "obvious" winners and everyone wanting to balance the vote.
No.105353
Anonymous
>>105349
Sticks won actually
No.105354
Anonymous
>Trio happens
>Eds voted out R1 due to them being the "silent" picks and none of the namefagged campaigners want to campaign for them.
No.105355
Anonymous
Image:170874797084.jpg(46kB, 320x320)4606904-1059668882-Stick.jpg
>>105349
No.105356
Anonymous
It's obvious the Eds are the frontrunners for /co/ trios, but what about /v/? I'm probably forgetting a big one, but it doesn't seem quite as obvious at least.
No.105357
Anonymous
Replies:>>105358
>Trio happens
>Eds voted out R1 against some trash team like "the shitinators" with Megamind, Azula and Jon Arbuckle
No.105358
Anonymous
Replies:>>105368
>>105357
That would just mean Vince rigged the round.
No.105359
Anonymous
Replies:>>105362
>>105346
>you'd either have to vote against them BECAUSE they seem too obvious
if you do this for that specific reason, you are hopeless
No.105360
Anonymous
>>105356
Sonic, Tails and Knuckles come to mind
No.105361
Anonymous
Image:170875024583.png(91kB, 302x230)Screenshot 2024-02-23 221729.png
totally jumping the gun making oc for my ms. main 8 months ahead of the tournament but what the hell it's fun and i like drawing her
No.105362
Anonymous
>>105359
I don’t even thing they are remotely the best animation trio it’s just the most insanely obvious ones /co/ would pick to win with the way they vote
No.105363
Anonymous
>>105356
Bulbasaur, Charmander, And Squirtle
No.105364
Anonymous
Replies:>>105366
>>105361
literally who
No.105365
Anonymous
>>105356
the Battletoads
No.105366
Anonymous
>>105364
Emilia, from Sitio Do Picapau Amarelo
real talk, it fucking blows when your favorite character is a literally who, especially where these tournaments are concerned, even with the advent of the literally who award
No.105367
Anonymous
>>105341
with a good enough campaign he could probably get to the elite 8
No.105368
Vince McMahon
Image:170875267166.png(279kB, 600x464)VinceA.png
>>105358
How many times do I have to tell yoouaAARGGGHHH!!! You're so lucky I'm not there!
No.105369
Anonymous
Replies:>>105403
>>105361
>>105366
I will now vote for your character
No.105372
Anonymous
Image:170876039072.png(22kB, 578x407)vytuouououououo.png
Hey, it's been a while. Thought i'd drop by and see what going on.
No.105373
Anonymous
Image:170876131193.jpg(78kB, 800x794)Ignored.jpg
>105372
No.105384
Anonymous
>>105366
Cheer up champ, she could always win Bottom 128, that's gotta count for something
No.105387
Anonymous
Image:170878101456.jpg(52kB, 500x500)1566488335353.jpg
>NightSHITanon is DEAD
No.105388
Anonymous
Is anyone else absolutely dumbfounded by the existence of NSA/OFA sometimes? It just astounds me that someone seemingly put this much effort into monopolizing the tournaments all while fumbling it in the most pathetic and infantile way possible. NSA could have easily gotten away with everything and the usual level of host incompetence (just look at how fucking hard it has been to convince the other hosts to do something about the situation) but nooo, he had to be a spiteful crybaby over fictional characters.
No.105389
Anonymous
Replies:>>105391
>>105388
I do not know but I am glad we finally get to leave that faggot in the past, because now that NSA is gone we might have an actual clean Ms. /co/ this year
Because 2023 was almost that but literally everything wrong with it was directly because of NiggerShift's hosting autism (e-mailgate, losers bracket vote drama in the finals, wuya now being seen as a rigged winner), otherwise it would've been seen as pretty close to 2018 or at least 2020 in terms of quality. Just hope we don't find some way to screw it up ourselves
No.105390
Anonymous
Replies:>>105398
>>105333
>Zorak won Mr. /co/ 2022
>Ruber rode all the way to the Finals in villains of /co/
>Silver keeps losing to contestants who reach E8 or become champions
They're definitely not invincible but they're far from being total jobbers.
No.105391
Anonymous
>>105389
If hosts are not looking out for rigged votes like they don’t for /tnt/ tournaments we might get in a really shitty situation where Peridot or the Sharty girls or Shirley win by some shit amount
Otherwise it should be far smoother, might take a longer time for them to get things done but people would trade qualifiers happening a hour later for no petty bitch host
No.105392
Anonymous
Replies:>>105393
>>105388
The funniest part to me is NSA saying that they want their characters to make Elite Eight but not win so they can continue campaigning in the future, but then she freaks out when her mains make it to Elite Eight but don't win.
No.105393
Anonymous
>>105392
C'mon, she actually does want her characters to win, what she didn't like was being unable to campaign for them when they get the 1 year Elite Eight time out.
... Which is still pretty fucking funny because NSA was staunchly against getting rid of the Elite Eight clause.
No.105394
Anonymous
Replies:>>105395
>>105391
There should unironically be some sort of protocols for instances where there is unquestionably some sort of rigging going around (I.e. Perifag going fucking haywire in the thread).
We really need to find something to combat genuine rigging autism that follows Ms. /co/.
No.105395
Anonymous
Replies:>>105448
>>105394
Didn't Spideranon say he was working on something, and that NightShit just never used it?
No.105396
Anonymous
>they think NSA is truly gone
Just you wait. When the pastebin drops you guys are gonna regret everything you said about her. She WILL be innocent and WILL be hosting the next tournaments.
No.105397
Anonymous
>>105396
Shut up Quint.
No.105398
Anonymous
Replies:>>105400
>>105390
>using side tournaments as evidence
No.105399
Anonymous
Replies:>>105402
>>105391
>Otherwise it should be far smoother, might take a longer time for them to get things done but people would trade qualifiers happening a hour later for no petty bitch host
Even that evens out actually since I assume with NSA being gone, the other hosts will use forms results instead of documents results; forms results are instant as soon as the round timer ends whereas the documents could take up to two hours to be released. So in the long run it would save a lot of time too.
I do want to ask the other hosts to confirm if they're going to go back to using forms results like we used to (and like they've been doing with tag-team and co-op) but I guess I can wait until after /cov/ to ask.
No.105400
Anonymous
Replies:>>105401
>>105398
>Mr. /co/
>side tournament
No.105401
Anonymous
Image:170879802126.png(280kB, 400x400)150532041650557687.jpeg
>>105400
yes.
No.105402
Anonymous
Replies:>>105423
>>105399
If NSA's leaving there should be a general rollback on their reign.
>go back to showing forms
>get rid of E8 and winner additional limitations in /v/
>either get rid of LB or make it an optional separately linked poll, never have crown steal possibility again
>maybe move the vote link back to the OP (the actual reasoning for moving it to the OC anchor was overt anti-majority pro-campaigner/drawfagging from NSA)
No.105403
Anonymous
Image:170879960848.png(28kB, 220x347)Santo_Cielo.png
>>105361
>>105366
>>105369
I can confirm here in latin they used to air this show in Tooncast where the other classic CN shows aired.
No.105406
Anonymous
>>105396
On opposite day
No.105423
Anonymous
>>105402
>>maybe move the vote link back to the OP (the actual reasoning for moving it to the OC anchor was overt anti-majority pro-campaigner/drawfagging from NSA)
nah, that one can stay
No.105424
Anonymous
>>105396
Rebeccabro btw
No.105425
Anonymous
Image:170881302805.jpg(30kB, 480x480)424729720469244002.jpg
>>105423
I agree, that one has worked but honestly a new voting system would be good too. Come to think of it, it's especially because of what has happened why NSA never went for other options when it comes to the voting system. I have the feeling those alternatives she speak of weren't even that expensive or didn't even have a price at all in the first place.
No.105427
Anonymous
Replies:>>105429
>>105425
>Come to think of it, it's especially because of what has happened why NSA never went for other options when it comes to the voting system.
He actually did but due to /tnt/ feedback he didn;t
No.105428
Anonymous
>>105423
Of course a /tnt/ user is arguing this
But don't complain when you don't like the results or you think too little of people are participating
No.105429
Anonymous
>>105427
Yes, I remember that. What was the name of the website he tested? I remember it was very sloppy.
No.105430
Anonymous
Replies:>>105448
Wasn’t the voting site she tested an IP grabber too? I wasn’t fucking trusting her with that information.
No.105431
Anonymous
>>105423
>>105425
What is having the vote link in the OC anchor ACTUALLY meant to work?
>filter the majooners
Then it's bias and gay. Reminder it was another one of those things implemented by NSA samefagging.
No.105433
Anonymous
>>105431
Putting the voting link in the OP doesn’t actually prevent anyone from voting because one has to enter the thread to access the voting link. If anything it only directs more attention to the anchor.
No.105434
Anonymous
Replies:>>105436
>>105431
Supposedly it's to make OC a bigger factor in swaying people's votes, in turn encouraging people to make more OC. That was supposedly why Eris and Wuya, the characters with the most notable OC presence, were the final two. But in practice who knows, the whole tournament could have been rigged for them.
No.105435
Anonymous
Replies:>>105440
>>105431
Nothing’s stopping the Silent Majority from looking at the OC anchor, if they get filtered then they don’t deserve the chance to vote in the first place.
No.105436
Anonymous
>>105433
>>105434
We don't need more people looking at the OCs, stupid /tnt/ users. If people want to vote without looking at any OC then they should. This is a character tournament not an OC tournament.
No.105437
Anonymous
Image:170881509621.png(66kB, 625x626)bait.png
>105431
>105436
No.105438
Anonymous
Image:170881529029.png(279kB, 680x659)Spoiler image
Putting the poll link in the OC anchor doesn't actually change anything. There's only one way for the silent majority to get filtered.
No.105439
Anonymous
Here's where I can find the OC anchor voting link thing brought up
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/139264553/#139264773
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/139264553/#139264964
Basically a self-proclaimed "salty waifufag part of the great round 1 purge" that stated they wanted more engagement "instead of the increasing number of silentfags." NSA agreed.
It very clearly was made in an attempt to bolster campaign favoritism and lessen silent majority impact. I don't think shrek poster is NSA samefagging (too many other complaints they have), but it is odd how it's another instance of NSA picking out and immediately favoring one meta suggestion over others. Or perhaps not that odd now knowing they were a fervent drawfag.
No.105440
Anonymous
>>105433
>>105435
Why should you NEED to look at the anchor to vote?
No.105441
Anonymous
>>105439
See? So if you want the voting link be in the anchor then you're literally just an NSAfag.
No.105442
Anonymous
Replies:>>105449
>>105439
It’s funny how /tnt/ will defend this specific NSA choice to benefit her art campaigns hard because they worship campooning as the greatest thing
You want this in the next tournament then you should be asking for NSA to return
No.105444
Anonymous
Look I just think changing where to vote should have at least... had a vote.
No.105448
Spideranon !!hAaBXjbZBz7
>>105395
I do not recall saying so. If anything, she used the scripts I made more than any other host. I believe at some point the others said something along the lines of "only NSA knows how to run J3nny", even.
>>105430
You're thinking of JotForms and yes, it can be set up to grab IPs. But it's worth noting it doesn't care if you are using a VPN. Also, from what NSA talked with me, she was more interested in its referrer widget than the IP thing.
No.105449
Anonymous
>>105442
whatever floats your boat dude
No.105450
Anonymous
>>105448
>it doesn't care if you are using a VPN
So what you're saying is... it's still easily riggable.
No.105451
Anonymous
>>105450
Well that’s why they clearly didn’t go with it
And we got to mention that nothing is going to stop full rigging outside of removing votes and doing very specific questions you have to answer when you put in your votes to see if there’s similarities
No.105452
Anonymous
Replies:>>105454
>>105451
The only thing that will stop full rigging is in-person verification.
No.105453
Anonymous
Image:170881801705.jpg(93kB, 746x497)jtu.JPG
>>105448
>>105450
This shit gets rids us of the little riggers, those who use multiple emails but aren't too dedicated about it.
This however is absolutely useless against someone like Perifag who is autistically obsessed to rig and ruin /co/ as a whole.
No.105454
Anonymous
Image:170881822876.jpg(123kB, 713x285)1680876803457175 (1).jpg
>>105452
I've suggested this sometime ago but what about shuffling password polls? Each time you refresh you get a new question and password you need to fill.
No.105455
Anonymous
>>105453
It's actually easier in theory as it would just required switching IP's on a client. With google you at least have to go through the process of making accounts and sometimes it'll set limitations.
No.105456
Anonymous
Replies:>>105458
I still want to know:
Can you remove results from google polls and can you have them removed and that show up when you make responses public?
No.105458
Anonymous
Replies:>>105461
>>105456
You can delete responses from Google Polls, yes. Not sure what you're asking with your second question.
No.105461
Anonymous
>>105458
Let's say you're making results to a poll public. If you delete the votes will those votes not be seen on the publicly shown results and not say that you deleted votes
If so, my question becomes why is NSA keeping the results private
No.105463
Spideranon !!hAaBXjbZBz7
>>105450
I should've added an * to that
It doesn't care about VPNs as in, it doesn't restrict it. Detected swaps of location access is a flag. And there can be some access problems. Also, the restriction may be toggleable, but I didn't really look into it.
>>105451
>that’s why they clearly didn’t go with it
Nah, the reason was because it was too slow for loading for some people.
Also, I'll say I've thought about some such verification as you described, probably as good as it gets in an anonymous context.
>>105453
You'd be correct as Perifag uses a paid VPN service. Though some other methods(some of which JotForms allows) would likely bar him since he's as dedicated as he's stupid.
Tho Jot isn't getting used anyway so moot point
No.105464
Anonymous
>>105461
Probably because deleting dozens of votes manually is a hassle and wastes time.
No.105466
Anonymous
>>105461
If you delete a response, it's fully gone. If a host deletes votes, no one can see that they did delete votes, not even themselves.
>why is NSA keeping the results private
The inner machinations of NSA's mind are an enigma.
No.105467
Anonymous
Replies:>>105469
>>105461
>>105464
If there are MASS deletions of votes going on it's easier to just present a separate doc of results than manually deleting them all.
No.105469
Anonymous
Replies:>>105471
>>105464
>>105467
So then how do you know votes are deleted or removed from results if you don't delete them
Explain to a bro this is insanely confusing
No.105471
Anonymous
Replies:>>105473
>>105469
We know votes were deleted at certain occasions due to characters getting a lower amount of votes than the amount of people saying that they voted for them.
No.105473
Anonymous
Replies:>>105474
>>105471
Also because the shakara rigger sacrificed his character's reputation to present evidence that NSA was deleting votes, since shakara ended up with less votes than the amount of alt accounts he voted with (and each alt voted differently as to prevent detection of duplicates). So it basically confirms the unreasonably low vote numbers from this year came from NSA mass deleting votes indiscriminately
No.105474
Anonymous
Replies:>>105475
>>105473
They never provided proof
No.105475
Anonymous
Replies:>>105476
>>105474
Anon, I wouldn't fucking desecrate the reputation of my pick for a lie. Especially one you actually want to see try and be good at. He was fully aware of it too.
No.105476
Anonymous
Replies:>>105477
>>105475
I can put up a Ruber image and say I voted for him 50 times but that doesn't mean I did
No.105477
Anonymous
No.105479
Anonymous
We should just feed NSA to Fang
No.105480
Anonymous
Image:170882706936.jpg(47kB, 1280x720)maxresdefault.jpg
i voted for ruber 50 times
No.105488
Anonymous
Ruber bro's...
No.105490
Anonymous
Out of curiosity, any characters that are well and truly banned forever from these tournaments? Asking for OC purposes.
No.105491
Anonymous
Replies:>>105492
>>105490
only the winners
No.105492
Anonymous
Replies:>>105496
>>105491
banned, not retired.
No.105495
Anonymous
>>105490
only the losers
No.105496
Anonymous
>>105492
Marco was banned from Mr. /co/ for a while
No.105497
Anonymous
Replies:>>105508
>>105490
Ebony & Ivory are actually banned due to Queen and King of /v/ not having a grandfather clause.
No.105498
Anonymous
No.105499
Anonymous
>>105490
Batkek due to the incarnation rule was banned in 2020 by Stats even when drastically changed incarnations were allowed in during the previous year
No.105501
Anonymous
>>105490
ponies
No.105502
Anonymous
>>105490
King Kong but fuck him since he nearly got the whitelist shit into the /co/ tournaments
No.105503
Anonymous
Replies:>>105505
speaking of the grandfather clause, would a hypothetical rollback of NSA's rules include removing propane from the list of grandfathered contestants? since she was the one who let it in.
No.105504
Anonymous
>>105490
Isn't Bridget banned from both Kind and Queen /v/?
No.105505
Anonymous
>>105503
no, in fact it'd do the exact opposite as the rule banning inanimate objects would be removed
No.105506
Anonymous
>>105504
They just never qualify.
No.105507
Anonymous
>>105504
There’s debate over it, but Bridget WAS allowed into King past two years despite not qualifying.
No.105508
Anonymous
>>105497
Hope we can finally add it now that Nightshift is outta here
No.105513
Anonymous
Replies:>>105514
I am looking forward to TADC going the way of murderdrones
No.105514
Anonymous
>>105513
Nah, TADC is fuckin's HUGE compared to Murder Drones, and last I checked, a good deal of /co/ already likes it.
No.105515
Anonymous
Replies:>>105516
>>105514
>a good deal of /co/ already likes it
so why didn't it save Omni-Man?
No.105516
Anonymous
Image:170883550167.jpg(26kB, 720x393)5FP.jpg
>>105515
His name is Omni-Man, he hates you anon
My name is Caine, I am your bitch anon
No.105518
Anonymous
>>105514
Something having a large fandom, especially something new, does not automatically equal a good run. Something might have a big immediate recency fandom but that does not mean the entire board likes it and no one hates it. And /co/ tournaments are more universal liking vs largest fandom, only Spinel and Fang bucked that trend and Spinel was entirely rigged and Fang had Genndy bias.
See how bad TVA and MD performs and that's how TADC will perform, especially if the fans start becoming entitled to a win. Maybe a round or two win but the hatedom will prevent anything past that
No.105519
Anonymous
>all these zoomer toon faggots thinking they have even a slight chance of doing well
I'm glad the voters aren't as retarded.
No.105520
Anonymous
Why does /co/ hate modern media so muc
Peppino managed to reach Top 32 and the final 4 in loser's bracket. Why not here?
No.105521
Anonymous
>>105520
There’s a lot more Zoomer games then there are zoomer cartoons, so there’s bound to be a few that /v/ likes, contrast with /co/ barely getting any new cartoons, there’s less series that have a chance at getting a positive reception.
No.105522
Anonymous
Replies:>>105523
>>105520
Another reason why /co/ tournaments are better. The voters don't have shit taste.
No.105523
Anonymous
Replies:>>105527
>>105522
Bejitabro btw
No.105524
Anonymous
>>105520
/v/ has a huge amount of underages
No.105525
Anonymous
Replies:>>105527
>>105524
Bejitabro btw
No.105526
Anonymous
>claim to be the frontrunners
>MDfag makes the OP images on the Ms /co/ discussion threads all Uzi pics up until round 1 ended
>Uzi’s “campaign” was just a couple autists posting the same images every thread with the caption “queen of /co/!”
>lose round 1
>rest of the tournament they keep circlejerking about how amazing their campaign was and how they deserved to win
>any sort of pushback got you labeled as a schizo because more than one person hating them is impossible
>beg /tnt/ to watch their show
>/tnt/ doesn’t like it
Do you think pomni will get the full MD treatment? Or will they be more humble than the MDfags?
No.105527
Anonymous
>>105525
>>105523
ONE JOKE

I DONT KNOW WHY
No.105528
Anonymous
>Dragonballtard likes zoomer games like pizza tower
Expected
No.105529
Anonymous
Replies:>>105530
>Claims to have better tastes
>Made Spinel of all characters one of their queens and very nearly voted for Joanna as another queen
No.105530
Anonymous
Replies:>>105531
>>105529
Don’t you have a poop tribute to make or something?
No.105531
Anonymous
>>105530
>Seething
Still haven’t gotten a single winner without a ton of baggage weighing her down after your first year by the way.
No.105532
Anonymous
Mr. Incredible is the unholy combination of metafagging and silentfagging so I’m not surprised people keep calling him a terrible E8 member
No.105533
Anonymous
>>105532
He's good now.
No.105534
Anonymous
>>105520
/v/ is more willing to play new games than /co/ is watch new cartoons. Toons are mostly a very youth-nostalgia based thing.
No.105536
Anonymous
>>105532
nah he's fine. At least he's a decent character from a classic movie.
A terrible E8 would be Jucika.
No.105537
Anonymous
Ms. winners are much, much better than King winners. It's not even close.
No.105538
Anonymous
Replies:>>105539
>>105537
…in my delusional fantasies.
No.105539
Anonymous
Replies:>>105540
>>105538
At least Ms. winners can be unexpected. Can't wait to see your incessant whining when AM inevitably wins this year.
No.105540
Anonymous
>>105539
>Sure our Ms winners suck ass but AT LEAST you can’t tell what flavor of shit they’ll be this year!
No.105541
Anonymous
Replies:>>105546
>>105524
underage is when you like & enjoy a recent video game
No.105542
Anonymous
>>105537
I kind of agree. Ms. winners are evaluated on their meta, and they're shittiest pantheon in comparison, but completely separate from tourney circumstances it's a decent representative line-up. You got Jenny, Monarch, and Wuya as classic board waifu's from classic shows. Fang and Primal are basically already classics. Betty is the most fitting obligatory legacy winner possible. And Spinel.... say what you will about SU but Spinel is statistically the most talked about of all the winners despite premiering later, and SU had its moments of taking over the board, biggest of all Spinel's premiere.
No.105543
Anonymous
>>105532
What's wrong with Mr. Incredible?
No.105544
Anonymous
>>105543
“WE MUST GET LE HECKIN’ BUFF GUY TO WIN /CO/LYMPUS” and then proceeding to do nothing with him
No.105545
Anonymous
>>105543
Lack of scat rp
No.105546
Anonymous
Replies:>>105548
>>105541
Yes. Real adults are too mature to enjoy the latest zoomer slop.
No.105547
Anonymous
Mr. Incredible is a bad E8 for tourney autism, but not a bad E8 as a character. The latter is more important.
No.105548
Anonymous
Replies:>>105550
>>105546
>ZOOMERZOOMERZOOMERZOOMER
No.105549
Anonymous
>>105532
what metafagging? he was a silent character in a silent bracket that got far because our of the silent characters he was the most liked
No.105550
Anonymous
Replies:>>105552
>>105548
>the zoomer is having a meltdown because real adults are the ones that are voting in the /co/ tournaments while underages are most of the voters in the /v/ tournaments
No.105552
Anonymous
Replies:>>105553
>>105550
Why are you such a mindbroken retard, did the big bad evil zoomers rape your mom?
No.105553
Anonymous
Replies:>>105554
>>105552
I think he's just doing the "intenonally retaredd" trolling thing
By his logic Elden Ring is zoomershit
No.105554
Anonymous
Replies:>>105555
>>105553
it is and so is Black Souls
No.105555
Anonymous
Replies:>>105559
>>105554
Clearly the lesson to take away here is that good Zoomer media already exists.
No.105556
Anonymous
Zoomers will win eventually anyways, they already have really, 4chan is just somewhat of a hold-out. Of course, zoomers time will come too when the alpha's amass.
No.105557
Anonymous
Replies:>>105558
Image:170884400284.jpg(55kB, 426x397)1680488308064394.jpg
>>105528
>t. JOBrus
No.105558
Anonymous
>>105557
K, b, c.
No.105559
Anonymous
Replies:>>105561
>>105555
...and other lies you can tell yourself.
No.105561
Anonymous
>>105559
… which are actually true.
No.105562
Anonymous
>/v/ Dragonball zoomer is having a meltdown
No.105563
Anonymous
Image:170884630179.jpg(21kB, 363x449)89acc93678fda949bf44466c0418a4c8.jpg
Of course, the zoomer was a fan of the OPTIONAL prequel that is Dragonball.
No.105564
Anonymous
Replies:>>105565
>He’s still seething over his boogeyman
No.105565
Anonymous
>>105564
Are you the guy who seethed when people were discussing Jack’s campaign in a negative light? You’re acting very similarly
No.105566
Anonymous
>>105565
I don’t care about Jack.
No.105567
Anonymous
Image:170884679948.gif(2.56MB, 478x268)CHADgeta hits JOBren.gif
No.105568
Anonymous
>>105565
>Jack's campaign
If is it Garland you are taking about, most of his fags dissapeared after a while becuase they were just bandwagoners.
No.105570
Anonymous
Replies:>>105571
>Nfag FLED
No.105571
Anonymous
>>105570
Of course, he's a zoomer. All zoomers have no taste and no balls.
No.105572
Anonymous
Replies:>>105573
>He’s STILL seething over his boogeymen
No.105573
Anonymous
Replies:>>105574
>>105572
Okay Nfag.
No.105574
Anonymous
>>105573
>Schizo headcanon
No.105575
Anonymous
N > Mr. Incredible
No.105576
Anonymous
Mr. Ncredible
No.105577
Anonymous
Nr. Mcredible
No.105578
Anonymous
I'M GONNA SAY THE N WORD
No.105579
Anonymous
Replies:>>105589
N is hot and I'm tired of pretending he's not.
No.105580
Anonymous
Image:170884918381.jpg(6kB, 225x225)N.jpeg
No.105581
Anonymous
Image:170884919534.png(78kB, 225x225)I.png
No.105582
Anonymous
Image:170884920799.png(78kB, 225x225)G.png
No.105583
Anonymous
nope
No.105584
Anonymous
Image:170884921870.jpg(12kB, 225x225)G.jpg
No.105585
Anonymous
Image:170884923047.png(76kB, 225x225)E.png
No.105586
Anonymous
Image:170884924238.jpg(8kB, 225x225)R.jpg
No.105587
Anonymous
Image:170884927764.jpg(17kB, 252x336)1638771527376.jpg
No.105588
Anonymous
>>105583
Bejitabro btw
No.105589
Anonymous
>>105579
I'd fuck his robussy.
Still not a good show or character though.
No.105590
Anonymous
Even in the robussy department N is kind of mediocre.
No.105591
Anonymous
>>105583
>n-word
YOU RETARD YOU JUST GAVE HIM MORE POWER
No.105592
Anonymous
>>105590
To be fair there’s not a lot of robussy competition, plenty of robot girls but very few robot guys.
No.105593
Anonymous
>>105590
Name some good robussy.
No.105601
Anonymous
>>105536
Slappy moment
No.105605
Anonymous
>>105536
Jucika is more interesting than a lot of the "generic 90s/2000s waifu you jerked off to as a kid" pack. At least she's exotic and unique, and it's disingenuous to dismiss her as a coom character when the top 10 seeds of any given year are all guaranteed to have more degenerate porn than her. If anything her comics are probably more classy than a good chunk of the art your average popular /co/ waifu receives.
No.105607
Anonymous
>>105605
Jucika's main issue is, like her comic, her supporters are insanely pretentious and humorless
No.105608
Anonymous
>>105607
...according to my headcanon.
No.105609
Anonymous
>>105607
> pretentious and humorless
In what way?
No.105611
Anonymous
Replies:>>105614
Jucika is actually not bad because she's not some shitty zoomer pick.
No.105614
Anonymous
>>105611
but she was
No.105615
Anonymous
Replies:>>105620
>>105605
>My Eastern Euro waifu that most people only learned about thanks to her being a FoTM is better than everyone else’s waifus because…..
No.105616
Anonymous
Replies:>>105617
Jucika is a boomer coomer joke character from an old obscure hungarian comic strip that became fotm a few years ago when twitter feminist rediscovered it.
No.105617
Anonymous
>>105616
I can guarantee you feminists groups on Xitter din't give a shit about Jucika.
No.105618
Anonymous
Replies:>>105621
There are really still people that don’t see Jucika as a terrible E8?
No.105619
Anonymous
>type Wuya on Desuarchive
>all the most recent mentions are in relation to Ms. /co/
People really don't care about Xiaolin nowadays do they.
No.105620
Anonymous
>>105615
She got discovered a couple years before she made E8 and still qualifies consistently, so clearly her popularity is a bit more sustainable than just FOTM.
No.105621
Anonymous
Replies:>>105623
>>105618
Not everyone gets autistically upset at seeing characters they don't know in E8
No.105623
Anonymous
>>105621
This kek.
No.105625
Anonymous
You know I'm surprised with all the NSA & Friends drama that happened the past two months no one brought up the Felix controversy from 2021
That might have been a very early warning sign of what was to come
No.105626
Anonymous
>>105625
Please enlighten me anon, because I can't quite recall that controversy.
No.105627
Anonymous
>>105625
I second what >>105626 said, what was it?
No.105628
Anonymous
>vagueposting
No.105629
Anonymous
Image:170888634805.png(29kB, 128x128)1509207732868.png
>Jucika
No.105636
Anonymous
Image:170888972210.png(13kB, 923x102)1634071835996.png
>>105626
Back in Mr /co/ 2021 when NSA and Ghost hosted for the first time after Stats died they had a long delay between the qualifier poll and giving the full results that weren't the top 128 (and never directly showed it through the forms). So after results were revealed and before R1 they gave out the number of votes for characters people requested that didn't qualify. When asked about Felix the Cat, who qualified the prior year, NSA said they got 107 votes. Issue was the cut-off for top 128 that year was 104, and 107 votes would mean Felix actually did qualify and would have been at minimum 122nd seed.
When the spreadsheet was finally made it said Felix had 101 votes, which was below the qualifier amount, and the character hasn't gotten close to qualification since. Some said it was an typing error and some were convinced he was rigged out.
It was a minor controversy that died and was forgotten quickly but it's notable because it's afaik the first controversy of NSA's reign. Also knowing later events like with Mr Boss plus seeing Alastor at 125th and Black Hat at 108th always makes you question.
No.105640
Anonymous
>>105528
>dismissing games just because of what generation they were released
fatherless behavior
No.105644
Anonymous
Replies:>>105654
>>105619
>NSA single-handedly ruined an obscure girl from an obscure show and those few fans who remembered without any sign of remorse whatsoever
No.105650
Anonymous
>dismissing toons just because of what generation they were released
fatherless behavior
No.105651
Anonymous
>>105650
I dismiss the shitty ones, I watch the ones that are good/got tricked into watching and now stuck on the train
No.105654
Anonymous
>>105644
This got me thinking, how are people going to treat Wuya as a character going forward meta-wise? I don't think there has been any serious attempt to brand her as an asterisk winner and we have to take into account there were more anons other than NSA supporting her, but I can only see her becoming another funpost shitstirrer a la Spinel.
No.105655
Anonymous
>>105654
Tier above Spinel and Recette. Tier below all the others.
No.105657
Anonymous
>>105654
She won by enough each time to avoid direct rigging allegations, but there's still a lot of voter remorse after what came out about her main campaigner. Wuya won't end up quite the same as Spinel, but there's going to be a hard split between people seeing her as just good and people thinking she was a waste.
No.105658
Anonymous
>>105654
on the same tier as recette, slightly higher if i had to guess, still above spinel and fang
No.105659
Anonymous
>>105640
>>105650
Go back to reddit or tiktok lil zoomies. This place is not for you.
No.105660
Anonymous
>105659
weak bait
No.105664
Anonymous
Replies:>>105667
>>105650
Maybe zoomies should make some good toons
No.105667
Anonymous
>>105664
"Zoomer" cartoons are made by millenials, retard-kun.
No.105668
Anonymous
Replies:>>105672
Image:170890161259.jpg(106kB, 823x858)7F836CF7-F95A-4F1D-B365-D6E0FE0AA9EE.jpeg
Best winner unironically
No.105669
Anonymous
Image:170890201519.jpg(1.82MB, 2048x1920)753.jpeg
No.105672
Anonymous
>>105668
zoomer winner
No.105673
Anonymous
Replies:>>105675
>>105640
Maybe zoomies should make some good games.
No.105675
Anonymous
>>105673
"Zoomer" games are made by millenials, retard-kun.
No.105681
Anonymous
Replies:>>105683
Why are xoomers so good at cartoons and games?
No.105683
Anonymous
>>105681
...in my headcanon.
No.105687
Anonymous
Replies:>>105689
>>105619
Wuya and Jack heavily carry Xiaolin Showdown's legacy, and are the only reason the show is remembered at all. It would be a literally who tier show like Juniper Lee if those two didn't have such a good villain dynamic.

Doesn't help that it had one of the worst reboots ever, but the less said about Chronicles the better
No.105689
Anonymous
>>105687
Don't forget the Wuya-Raimundo dynamic.
No.105691
Anonymous
NSA has made people forget that Wuya has been in every tournament since the very first one and was seen as a low mid major until she won
It's not like she's an entire literal who
No.105697
Anonymous
If the all star meme ever comes true I hope Jenny loses round 1. I don’t even dislike her, I’m just sick of the jennyfags who shit on every other winner and I want it to bite them on the ass
No.105699
Anonymous
>>105697
>You can’t shit on the other winners for being bad Jennyfag fuck you for having standards
No.105700
Anonymous
>>105697
Nfag btw
No.105701
Anonymous
>jennyfags are getting cocky again
No.105702
Anonymous
>>105697
Spinel is going to win all-stars
No.105703
Anonymous
Image:170891394890.jpg(44kB, 500x500)Jetstream_sam.jpg
>mfw
>Recette beats Jenny in the all-star tournament
No.105704
Anonymous
Image:170891407290.jpg(34kB, 320x238)Neptune.jpg
this thread fucking sucks
No.105705
Anonymous
Replies:>>105707
Image:170891412085.jpg(207kB, 904x960)4606904-1059668882-Stick.jpg
>>105703
Now that sounds hilarious!
No.105707
Anonymous
Image:170891495070.png(3.08MB, 2202x2160)A69261F9-97E2-4D63-A00C-42A442DE34C3.png
>>105705
no
No.105708
Anonymous
Image:170891521680.gif(3.99MB, 640x358)170813885366.gif
Wouldn't it be funny if Wuya won the All-Stars? That would mean NSA will get the last laugh after all of this.
No.105711
Anonymous
>>105697
Not gonna happen.
No.105712
Anonymous
Replies:>>105715
How will we do All-Stars? Both male and female winners for each board per tourney? Curious about the brackets as well. Could go off win percentages or something like that.
No.105715
Anonymous
>>105712
I always saw it as an 8th year celebration thing (elite-elite 8) and having either one side of the bracket be one gender of winners, or just an even gender mix of winners.
No.105716
Anonymous
>>105697
If you want Jenny to lose vote a viable non-controversial ms. /co/ this year.
I know you won't though.
No.105717
Anonymous
>>105716
She’s still the only clean winner after 5 years, if NSA getting overthrown doesn’t lead to another clean winner then Ms is hopeless.
No.105719
Anonymous
Replies:>>105720
>>105716
Seems like a very roundabout way of saying people should support Tyr'ahnee.
No.105720
Anonymous
>>105719
Already won a tournament, won't be votin' for her
No.105721
Anonymous
>>105691
> was seen as a low mid major
That's a very generous description of a Round 1 jobber
No.105722
Anonymous
>>105721
>t. high low minor character supporter
No.105723
Anonymous
Replies:>>105726
>>105721
Nah she won some rounds as well before 2023 and I consider anyone who regularly appears in tournaments a mid major at minimum
The real jobbers are the fags who never qualify, then round 1 jobbers, then everyone else isn't
No.105724
Anonymous
Replies:>>105728
Image:170892017502.jpg(62kB, 1024x666)The Riggers.jpg
>>105703
>mfw
>Zorak wins the all-star tournament
No.105725
Anonymous
>the all stars tournament somehow comes down to Spinel vs. Recette
No.105726
Anonymous
>>105723
Last time she made Round 2 before was in 2019, which was the year of the big rigs
No.105727
Anonymous
Replies:>>105730
imagine Kronk winning the All-Star tournament while being silent again
No.105728
Anonymous
Replies:>>105767
>>105724
>plunderers
Round one jobbers.
No.105730
Anonymous
>>105727
Kronk is hilarious and from a great movie so I'd be perfectly fine with that outcome
No.105733
Anonymous
>>105697
>jennyfags get called out for their cockiness and overall shit behavior
>they lose it
Lol
No.105734
Anonymous
>The fans of the shit winners are seething over the only clean queen again
No.105736
Anonymous
Replies:>>105738
>>105734
Hey if you don’t want people to be annoyed with you maybe stop acting like a smug cunt at every opportunity
No.105737
Anonymous
Image:170892279270.gif(1.28MB, 498x376)xj9-mlaatr.gif
No.105738
Anonymous
Replies:>>105742
>>105736
It is objectively true, 5 winners after her and every single one of them has major baggage, there is nothing you can do to change this fact.
No.105742
Anonymous
>>105738
You mean like
>oh her show was being canned at the time
>oh her show was being aired at the time
>oh she was the last defense against spitevotes
Those aren’t examples of major baggage, that’s you whining over meta shit and or nitpicking to try to act like a self assured smug cunt.
No.105745
Anonymous
Replies:>>105748
>>105742
They're all shit winners. Jenny isn't.
No.105747
Anonymous
Replies:>>105749
>the Nfag is going after Jenny now
No.105748
Anonymous
Replies:>>105752
>>105745
So finally going mask off, good.
Tournament culture was a mistake
No.105749
Anonymous
>>105747
Nfag is a raging tard and I hate murderdrones, I’m tired of the purity testing nonsense and golden cow bullshit.
No.105751
Anonymous
>>105742
>Pity winner
>Deflecting from the fact that NSA botched her win permanently by not letting her beat Chel fair and square
>A tournament that was so shit that the winner can only be considered good in a vacuum
If every other tournament can manage to have more than 1 winner that people can accept then Ms /co/ can do the same thing, you have another year, pick a winner that people can generally accept instead of whining that people rally behind the one girl that isn’t tainted.
No.105752
Anonymous
>>105748
Yes having recurring tournaments mean some winners will be better than others, I'm glad you understand. You can leave this tournament board now.
No.105757
Anonymous
Replies:>>105763
Jenny is just undeniably the best winner of her respective tourney, more so than any other tourney winner. Ms. is a fucking shit tourney and she won with no cheats, no meta bullshit, no fotm boost, and she's universally agreeable and a popular long-time icon of the board. In fact the only controversy I've ever actually seen of her is this anon angry that she's so widely well regarded.
No.105759
Anonymous
I like how Betty and Fang are probably the most clean winners outside of Jenny, and yet they both have a lot of opposite problems from each other.
No.105760
Anonymous
I enjoyed Eris and Wuya's campaigns overall, even with the latter being tainted. Still think people were riding the high way too much with that super campaign finale. I don't want everything to be a meta game here, but it's also going to hurt having two of the best heavy hitters be ineligible later this year.
No.105763
Anonymous
Replies:>>105769
>>105757
I’m not angry she’s well regarded, I’m annoyed with the people that claim everyone else is shit.
No.105764
Anonymous
>>105759
Betty is definitely the next most "clean" winner in that there was no known fuckery about her orboost for or against her. She just scooted on by being inoffensive and unnoticeable like the rest of the 2021 E8.
No.105767
Anonymous
Image:170892516425.jpg(259kB, 1171x800)zorak_rainbow.jpg
>>105728
>t. rainbow pony
No.105768
Anonymous
>>105760
You're talking about Raven and Toph right? Well we still have Tyr'ahnee. Everyone's best bet is probably her. She literally has all the makings of a good veteran winner with none of the problems except for being a runner-up.
No.105769
Anonymous
Replies:>>105923
>>105763
Then what's your angle for evaluating a winner? If you're asking to see the winner's completely separate from meta and tourney circumstances that's fair enough. But it's difficult to do that when it becomes inarguable that they wouldn't be a winner at all without those circumstances. Basically a winner's worth becomes inherently bound in their tourney to some degree, like it or not. Getting tourneyheads to then detach all that is pretty much an impossible task.
No.105770
Anonymous
>>105760
Eris and Wuya being the "super campaigner finale" is much worse in retrospect of all the NSA revelations, and puts a bit of doubt to its legitimacy. Prior to all that shit I was fine with Wuya, now I think it should've went to Toph.
No.105771
Anonymous
Replies:>>105773
Image:170892550157.jpg(20kB, 768x768)1692809093747.jpg
Is Silveranon around here? I want to talk to him about something in private. It's not related to the tournament or characters, it's something off-topic I want to talk about with him. If he does have a gmail I'd like to message him otherwise I will show him mine.
No.105772
Anonymous
>>105734
Wouldn't Boop and Monarch also be clean wins? They were before NSA took over and there were no cheating scandals around them.

If you wanna complain about Monarch benefiting from the cancellation news or Boop winning in a meta-voting year as a compromise winner, go ahead but those things don't make a win 'dirty'. You could just as easily nitpick about Jenny benefiting from first year weirdness and a super small tournament, but that doesn't make her win dirty either
No.105773
Anonymous
Replies:>>105789
>>105771
This guy just wants a free therapy session btw.
No.105774
Anonymous
Replies:>>105789
>105771
t. cumnuts
No.105775
Anonymous
>>105772
Did Monarch cheat? Almost certainly not. It just feels like a hollow victory because of the circumstances. I don't mind going against the current every now and then, but it's wild to see the only feasible girl from a very male-centric show win out over several big powerhouses.
No.105776
Anonymous
Replies:>>105779
>>105772
First year weirdness only applies to stuff like exceptional blowouts and small-time characters getting results they would never have again. First years still establish who the general powerhouses are and with the winner beating them all without E8 stipulations or past-inner-tourney contextual effects.
No.105779
Anonymous
Replies:>>105781
>>105776
I'd go as far as to argue that the only massive flukes in the main inaugural Elite Eights are Black Canary and, for very specific reasons, Captain America. The majority have returned at least once in later year, to the point where only six others haven't returned later on.

>Helen Parr, who still seeds well and has only lost to one arguable fluke loss in April O'Neil
>Kuzco, who was hurt soon after by Kronk's same series win and yet is finally recovering as seen last year
>Peach, a big legacy pick that seeds alright despite weaker results later on
>Doomguy, who seeds around the top and still remained a finalist filter up until an upset loss last year
>Superman, another big legacy pick whose downfall is arguably tied about as much to comics' failing relevance in the /co/ tournaments
>Duke Nukem, a fairly popular /v/-core pick among at least older regulars

If you want to stretch it, then maybe the Duke is also a fluke?
No.105781
Anonymous
>>105779
You forgot, JJJ was a fluke. He didn't even qualify last year.
No.105782
Anonymous
>>105781
Last Mr. /co/'s qualifiers were so much of a fluke that it might as well cancel out, especially when his absence caused a lot of uproar afterwards.
No.105783
Anonymous
>>105781
He came back, narrowly lost in R4, then got 7th the year after. His not qualifying last year is the fluke.
No.105790
Anonymous
>cumnuts is getting mad because he won't be getting his free therapy session
No.105791
Anonymous
>everyone i don't like is cumnuts
No.105792
Anonymous
Image:170892941106.png(310kB, 569x422)joker.png
The Anti-Zorakfag may have died pretty quickly, but it sure spawned the pain in the ass that is Anti-Silverfag
No.105795
Anonymous
For what reason would this nigga be asking for a private conversation with Silveranon unrelated to tourney's?
No.105796
Anonymous
>>105795
He wants to hook up.
No.105798
Anonymous
Replies:>>105800
>>105795
>nigga
Just say nigger, newfag.
No.105800
Anonymous
Replies:>>105801
>>105798
>tryhard nigga
No.105801
Anonymous
No.105803
Anonymous
No.105804
Anonymous
Replies:>>105805
>>105801
you nigger
No.105805
Anonymous
Replies:>>105806
>>105804
But I'm you.
No.105806
Anonymous
Replies:>>105810
>>105805
Prove it.
No.105810
Anonymous
Image:170893122602.jpg(26kB, 300x300)SameCELL.jpg
>>105806
Me and you (also me)
No.105812
Anonymous
I'm everyone.
No.105819
Anonymous
Replies:>>105820
>>105792
Credit where it's due, Anti-Zorakfag actually was one of the first to call out NSA's underhanded behaviour and believed she was causing drama on purpose during the 2022 furrigging fiasco.
No.105820
Anonymous
Replies:>>105852
>>105819
Anti-Zorakfag... Was a hero.
No.105849
Anonymous
Replies:>>105850
>>105792
it's the same guy
No.105850
Anonymous
>>105849
It's not. Anti-Zorakfag was super fixated on specifically Zorak being rigged. Anti-Silverfag is just some incredibly dense motherfucker with a vendetta against his roleplayer. He might or might not be Temp.
No.105851
Anonymous
>>105759
>Fang
>clean
No.105852
Anonymous
Replies:>>105853
Image:170895566312.jpg(9kB, 300x225)A-1719518-1346381499-8063.jpeg.jpg
>>105820
*blink* I forgive him even though I had nothing to do with those Space Ghost threads being spammed that pissed him off
No.105853
Anonymous
>>105852
That was some /r9k/ autist whose spam just so happened to overlap with the tournament.
No.105854
Anonymous
>>105850
I honestly feel sorry for Temp. For it was the mods and randomized seeds that made him the monster he's today
No.105857
Anonymous
>>105691
And she didn't even make E8 all those previous times.
No.105863
Anonymous
>>105850
No i am not Temp and you need to stop trying to tie in everyone you disagree with as specific named autists it’s making you look schizophrenic
No.105864
Anonymous
>>105863
Temp btw
No.105866
Anonymous
>>105863
Numbnuts btw
No.105872
Anonymous
>>105863
NSAbro btw
No.105874
Anonymous
Past hour of discussion bros…
No.105875
Anonymous
>>105874
>anon that replies disagreeing with me gets btfo by the site
No.105877
Black Hand ## Developer
>>105875
You can blame CentOS.
No.105878
Anonymous
Image:170897056379.jpg(57kB, 500x403)1584862354394.jpg
>>105874
>>105875
No.105883
Anonymous
Replies:>>105884
>>105781
JJJ was confirmed by Ballsanon to have had votes deleted. JJJ knew the truth about that NSmenAce.
No.105884
Anonymous
>>105883
Bro every single character (besides maybe Black Hat voters kek) had votes removed, it took 25 or so votes to make a tournament which is nothing
No.105885
Anonymous
Image:170897349218.jpg(34kB, 551x422)1649399304135.jpg
>>105884
It is fucked up how Mr. /co/ 2023 had votes comparable to Tag-Teams 2023
No.105886
Anonymous
>>105884
Fair point. However, JJJ definitely would have qualified if the votes weren't rigged because of how strong he is. Two E8 runs and one snub all while in the top 30 seeds is nothing to scoff at. 
No.105887
Anonymous
Image:170897375975.png(856kB, 1006x766)IMG_8444.png
How likely it is NSA only deleted qualifier votes so Black Hat could qualify? He was the cut-off, after all.
No.105888
Anonymous
Replies:>>105889
>>105887
I mean...
Just look at the nomination list, Black Hat had the same votes as 10 contestants but he was raised as the highest seed there despite not even being the first one to be nominated.
No.105889
Anonymous
Replies:>>105899
>>105887
>>105888
Well look on the bright side, Black Hat may have been Captain America-tier rigged, but just like Cap he's never going to qualify ever again because of it
No.105891
Anonymous
>>105887
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11o2pJRb47IHnWBLYdm_cn6w_OthxvVIFAyJEB8u9e5g/htmlview
>it's true
No.105892
Anonymous
Replies:>>105901
Image:170897515637.png(666kB, 731x802)irongiant-animationscreencaps.com-2976.png
>>105887
As a 4toruneywiki editor, I've been exposed to the nominations sheets and seeds more times than I can count and I can confirm that NSA definitely had some work in there. Check other tournaments qualifier sheets and earlier Mr. /co/ qualifiers and see how there is one defining detail and that being the inconsistency and variety. In Mr. /co/ (most of 2023 tournaments for that matter) had this odd consistency about them, there were a lot of characters that were under the same vote count but were randomly decided for their seeds. Every other prior tournament qualifier sheet were extremely random and characters most often had their vote count just by themselves, and even when it was shared it was around the middle to lower parts, not throughout the whole sheets.
No.105894
Anonymous
>>105891
mother of fuck
No.105895
Anonymous
>>105887
This is a theory that has been passed around every now and then
Black Hat isn’t the only character she supports so the idea that the entirety of the polls was driven down to the exact number of this character needed to qualify is a bit insane, there probably was actual rigged votes remove. However, it’s pretty obvious she will let it slide just enough to get him in
No.105897
Anonymous
Replies:>>105917
Image:170897546629.jpg(740kB, 1203x800)1634838996759.jpg
>>105891
>Putting Black Hat first and foremost
You can't make this shit up.
No.105899
Anonymous
Replies:>>105905
>>105889
At least Capanon successfully rigged his character up to the finals and didn’t get away with it because Johnny was the most dominant /co/ contestant ever and it wasn’t possible
Jobber Hat had the entire host bending the tournaments entirely for them and not even having to show the results to us plebs and he could only get to round 3. Imagine being so shit a contestant when specifically rigged this is as far as you can get
No.105900
Anonymous
>>105887
It's odd cause you got something like Black Hat being the cutoff in weirdly low qualifier results, but then you also got Goo being 28th seed. Maybe Perifag threw some votes to Goo and NSA just decided to keep those.
No.105901
Anonymous
Replies:>>105904
>>105892
Well because you dwelled the qualifer sheets so much, what do you about Boos high seed placement?
No.105902
Anonymous
The other hosts themselves could shed more light on this but it's not like they are willing to. And honestly, it's probably for the better.
No.105904
Anonymous
No.105905
Anonymous
Replies:>>105917
Image:170897691698.png(259kB, 1331x3165)SOMETIMES I CAN GET A BIT FORGETFUL.png
>>105899
>>105900
>Imagine being so shit a contestant when specifically rigged this is as far as you can get
>Maybe Perifag threw some votes to Goo and NSA just decided to keep those.
Because NSA couldn't rig by stuffing the ballot herself, she could only directly delete votes from the Forms AND most likely ignored external cheating from other people depending on how their biases aligned with hers.
No.105906
Anonymous
Replies:>>105907
>>105900
Perifag didn’t vote because of the email recording that round. Perifag also doesn’t care about a single character besides Peridot and they only vote in relation to Peridot or against characters who eliminate Peridot. The only character Perifag might care for is Zim because he was the direct influence for Peridot
Goo’s placing just doesn’t add up with the theory. The vote totals are way too high for a rig job to happen. If NSA just put her in, why wouldn’t he just say Black Hat was a 40th seed with no evidence instead of going through the effort of removing votes so Black Hat got in, when Goo was supposedly just inserted in without need to change vote results
The question becomes more how did Goo get enough votes to rank that higher
No.105907
Anonymous
>>105906
email recording started Round 1.
Perifag could've thrown votes to others in a modicum of effort to throw off the trail. I'm just trying to think of a reasonable explanation here.
No.105908
Anonymous
Replies:>>105915
It was only a minor controversy in comparison to JJJ, but many of us were surprised Captain Amelia and Creepy Susie in particular didn’t qualify last year. Both were only a few votes away from making the bracket, but more interestingly both were amongst the characters NSA specifically denied being rigged during Ms. /co/ 2022. Mmmm…
No.105910
Anonymous
Meant to ask >>105903 here
No.105915
Anonymous
Replies:>>105918
>>105908
I feel both had genuine support, especially with Ms. 2022 having a weirder spread of results in general. Now it would be both funny and sad if NSA was ignoring other cases of rigging that tournament, but I also don't want to start anything against either girl there without solid proof.
No.105917
Anonymous
>>105887
>>105891
>>105897
>>105905
I don't believe that she actually changed anything with the main rounds beyond the Gardevoir/Muffet incidents and smear campaigns, but I can also more than believe that she might have been testing herself with the qualifier forms with them being up to less scrutiny in the past. Just another reason it's good we caught her now and not later.
No.105918
Anonymous
Replies:>>105920
>>105915
Oh no I wasn't implying they were being rigged during 2022, but that I'm somewhat suspicious NSA intentionally excluded them from qualifying last year. Susie was one of the few characters to consistently qualify for every single Ms. /co/ until last year.
No.105920
Anonymous
>>105918
Ah, my bad then. Yeah, while not as bad as Mr. /co/lympus's own qualifiers there was still some oddities from Ms. /co/ last year.
No.105923
Anonymous
Replies:>>105926
>>105769
>quality of character
>how much I personally like them
>how much they represent the board
The only thing I truly take issue with is if they were rigged for. Which is why only spinel is on my shit list.

I’ll reiterate because reading comprehension is on the decline these days, I like Jenny, I don’t think all the winners are equal, I’m just sick of certain people constantly jerking themselves off and claiming only Jenny is good at all and everyone else is garbage. I’m also sick of meta factors and nitpicky bullshit being blown out of proportion.

The fact that me saying that I’m sick of people shitting on everyone else was enough to cause a good amount of seething is an example of my issues.
No.105924
Anonymous
Replies:>>105925
>>105891
I told you fuckers the incredibly low amount of qualifier votes was super suspicious
No.105925
Anonymous
>>105924
The thing I'm wondering is how did NSA manage to justify this to the other hosts.
No.105926
Anonymous
>>105923
I'll reiterate. There's the matter if a character largely wins via some meta and tourney circumstances then their victory and hence their worth as a winner is tied with that. If you're going to give Spinel a hit for this you may as well the rest.
No.106048
Anonymous
Karen is getting a boost this year isn't she.
No.106049
Anonymous
Replies:>>106050
>>106048
What happened now?
No.106050
Anonymous
>>106049
FoTM boost thanks to an episode where she wears a red dress, makes a lot of emotes with her display head, and yuri shipping with an orange fish girl, likely won’t last all the way to September to actually have an effect on her perfomance.
No.106051
Anonymous
Remember when everyone thought that Garfield Australian guy was going to sweep Mr. /co/lympus?
No.106052
Anonymous
Replies:>>106054
>>106050
I'm barely seeing threads on /co/ and they have low replies so I'm seeing this change nothing at all
More so images will be used during her campaign
No.106053
Anonymous
>>106048
>>106050
Karen has always been a midcarder, so even if this gave her a slight boost somehow it wouldn't be a solo endeavor.
No.106054
Anonymous
>>106052
Thread presence doesn't affect tournament performance at all. If it did those Murder Drones would've been in the Elite 8 already.
No.106055
Anonymous
>>106050
>makes a lot of emotes with her display head, and yuri shipping with an orange fish girl
This sounds like a detriment if anything.
No.106072
Anonymous
>>106051
I'm still sad Durk didn't make it in anything last year
it's not like Garfield suffers from series limit or anything it's always the same 2 characters
No.106084
Anonymous
Replies:>>106102
>>102718
I wonder how many here have been around since the first. Seems like the majority now were around 2020 onward. I still remember the thread Jenny won and I'm pretty sure seeing that OP OC drop.
No.106087
Anonymous
>>106051
Truly nobody likes to be hated by the population.
No.106102
Anonymous
Replies:>>106103
>>106084
Yep, one of the OGs around since that first tournament (though I didn't take note of it until a few rounds in)
Really was a different vibe entirely and no one thought they'd eventually turn into this or even really continue. Imagine a modern tournament who has trouble getting characters nominated and can only muster 150.
Knowing what I know now wish I nominated some more characters while I still could for the only chance of them actually being in a tournament. Also what's odd to think is those few anons decided some of the traditions and also which characters would be grandfathered in like how Eggman is allowed in but Sonic and Tails aren't. We were a few votes from Sora being grandfathered in. A DBZ character was nominated at one point too which would have been insane if allowed in and grandfathered in.
No.106103
Anonymous
>>106102
> Imagine a modern tournament who has trouble getting characters nominated and can only muster 150.
Heroes of /v/ was kinda like that
No.106116
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
I haven't heard from NSA in a while. I'm worried she's gone the way of Stats. I don't want to put a halt on the deadline but I also hope she's okay.

>>104473
I've pitched my idea to Nickelodeon during one of their pitch contests but they denied it. I'm thinking about either going indie or pitching it to a company since my project can work either as a full series or a mini-series. I'd prefer indie, but I lack the funds.
No.106117
Anonymous
Replies:>>106127
>>106116
>I've pitched my idea to Nickelodeon
DOA
No.106118
Anonymous
>>106116
>I've pitched my idea to Nickelodeon duri-
WHY THE HELL WOULD ANYBODY EVER DO THAT?
Especially after Harvey Beaks
You're just asking to get barely advertised and then silently cancelled after 1 season
No.106119
Anonymous
Replies:>>106127
Image:170914374637.png(12kB, 800x500)....png
>>106116
>I've pitched my idea to Nickelodeon
No.106121
Anonymous
Replies:>>106127
>>106116
I also hope NSA is doing alright and living a happy life far, far away from these tournaments. Silently stepping away rather than making a big show of the pastebin is probably for the best anyways.
>I've pitched my idea to Nickelodeon during one of their pitch contests but they denied it.
Having to bounce around between networks tends to be the norm for showrunners, especially for showrunners pitching to Nickelodeon who are notoriously picky bastards (let's not forget the time they turned down adventure time, only for that particular golden goose to end up in the hands of CN) so that's to be expected. If it's indie Kickstarter/Gofundme seems to always be the go-to for getting it off the ground.
No.106122
Anonymous
>>106118
It doesn't help either way, if it's successful they will turn it into their now milking cow like SpongeBob, FoP and TLH.
No.106125
Anonymous
>>106116
>I’ve pitched my idea to The Spongebob Squarepants and Friends channel
What the hell were you thinking?
No.106127
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
Replies:>>106130
>>106117
>>106118
>>106119
Ha ha good thing they denied it then. I want my story to get two seasons max, and given what my project's story is about. I don't think they would've wanted to do much with it anyways. I've been doing alot of research for this story and I'd hate to see it be thrown away.

I've been reading the Avatar second edition art book lately and it's clear Nick is a different company from what it was in 2003.

>>106121
If NSA wants to silently step away, I don't blame her. I just wish she told us first.
No.106130
Anonymous
Replies:>>106133
>>106127
I'm the anon that wanted to contact NSA on discord, if she's not around then can I add you instead?
No.106133
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
Replies:>>106135
No.106135
Anonymous
Replies:>>106136
>>106133
alright, tried adding you but it didn't work, so here's mine TheWanderer1800#3560
No.106136
Anonymous
>>106135
What is it you want to ask the hosts about, anyway?
No.106138
Anonymous
>>106136
Numnuts being Numnuts
No.106139
Anonymous
>>106129
So much for being a "bad" artist.
No.106141
Anonymous
Image:170914793985.png(110kB, 243x300)Spoiler image
>>106138
No.106143
BallsAnon !!tNX6nZEObO7
No.106201
Anonymous
>>106129
Does this art line up with NSA’s other drawings?
No.106204
Anonymous
>>106201
Yes but also it doesn't really matter, NSA = OFA has been confirmed a long time ago and we already know what NSA's art looks like
No.106207
Anonymous
Replies:>>106209
Image:170915677904.jpg(144kB, 1073x745)villainous_an_attempt_at_flirting_by_onlyfansart_deqwqwu-pre.jpg
>>106201
Somewhat? I really couldn't find any more recent works that depict animals (mighty appreciated if someone does) but there is the consistent pointy and blocky arm and feature doodles that was pointed out by Silveranon.
No.106209
Anonymous
Image:170915703763.jpg(215kB, 891x987)1625481789751.jpg
>>106207
I forget how horny women tend to get.
No.106319
Anonymous
Replies:>>106329
>>106116
She's definitely fine, it's that everyone knows it's over and there's no recovery, so it's better to quietly retire now and people forget overtime so she can get back to drawing art on random boards and elsewhere. Because most of 4chan doesn't know about her and the whole internet doesn't so that won't change much
If she's hurting herself because of some random ass character tournament on 4channel she'd have far bigger personal issues then anything she'd need help with.
No.106329
Anonymous
>>106319
I want to believe NSA will quietly retire and try to actually change from here on out rather than hurt herself over any of this, but at the same time she didn't exactly offer the image of someone willing to let go of the tournaments or who felt the faintest bit of remorse over her actions.
No.106332
Anonymous
NSA should quit because her secretive fed job is clearly too important to worry about 4chan tourneys.
No.106423
Psyanon !umpn/.DAgw
Well, if the show ever does take off, you know who to ring if you need to put a voice to things.
No.106445
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
Image:170923020376.png(872kB, 1000x900)happy anniversary.png
>>106423
Dude, I'd be honored to have you in my project. I even have an idea for a part where your voice could fit into the Proof of Concept.

We're doing a 2-5 minute proof of concept first because I don't want to overwork my Discord studio and I believe we should test the waters and slowly gain popularity before creating something as big as a pilot and kickstarter/patreon. Also I sent a friend request to you already, I wanted to ask something tournament related.
No.106449
Anonymous
So uhh, would a series and characters made by hosts be advantaged in the tourneys or no?
No.106467
Anonymous
Replies:>>106471
>>106449
Made by someone who used to host? Neat, might get tiny boost, but don't expect that to carry it.
Made by someone who is still hosting? People shit their pants at the thought of hosts liking a character, imagine it'd be the same thing, if not more, for a character they literally made.
No.106471
Ghost !!Oo4T4nqR2jB
>>106449
>>106467
I honestly don't expect my characters to ever make it past qualifiers, regardless if I'm hosting or not.
No.106475
Anonymous
>>106449
Satina's creator used to openly post on /co/ but I don't think it ever did her characters any favor
No.106478
Anonymous
Replies:>>106479
Image:170923646104.png(3.87MB, 4350x432)satina background.png
>>106475
The artists working on the show also posted on /co/, and posted some art from the show.
No.106479
Anonymous
Image:170923656772.png(1.39MB, 1526x734)satina 2023-04-17 13_30_41-Window.png
>>106478
Apparently one of their inspirations was Doug TenNapel related stuff (Neverhood, Earthworm Jim), hence the Granny Chair from Earthworm Jim 2.
No.106488
Anonymous
>>106475
They weren’t a host intimately involved with tourneys though.
The most creator engagement tourneys got I can remember is the Blu Rivers guy campaigning for her in bottom.
No.106536
Anonymous
Replies:>>106565
>>106423
How are you doing these days, Psyanon?
No.106565
Psyanon !umpn/.DAgw
>>106536
Oh, I'm fine. Work's really starting to pick up at the job now that I've been in for a year, but I've already figured out sneaky little tricks to make sure I have time to do the shows without taking actual time off work. I'm making some steps in my life to try and make VA work an actual career; it just wasn't feasible earlier, what with dealing with a new mortgage and the like. Fortunately I have my VA benefits to use as a buffer in extremis.
No.106572
Anonymous
Image:170925075859.jpg(276kB, 934x755)147DAB97-5487-4F63-8868-28F3F0F77EA3.jpeg
It’s very odd to me how much /tnt/ considers Fang a terrible winner when she embodies a lot of things /tnt/ loves.
>OC production machine
>campaigned for heavily
>started as an underdog but fought her way to the top tier

The big issue people have with her requires you to take NSA at her word and believe her “derigging” shit as legitimate (it’s not).
>NSA said Chel was the true second place winner so fang is bad because she never faced her!
>NSA is dishonest and shouldn’t be listened to.
How do you believe both of these are true at the same time? It doesn’t make sense to me.

And we have the original sheets which showed that she beat shirley 55/45 (the stats the wiki uses, they have Shirley at 2nd too btw) so we know NSA didn’t rig her to victory.
No.106575
Anonymous
>>106572
The people who complain about Fang now were already complaining about her back in 2020. The circumstances surrounding her 2022 run are unfortunate, but honestly feel like an excuse for her detractors above anything else.
No.106580
Anonymous
Replies:>>106604
>>106572
You'll note every single time that people who shit on Fang (including the IC Discord) then also try to paint Shirley as this misunderstood legitimately voted character.
It's pretty obvious they are still seething they got caught rigging and their Discord mascot didn't get to win.
No.106584
Anonymous
>>106572
>It’s very odd to me how much /tnt/ considers Fang a terrible winner when she embodies a lot of things /tnt/ loves.
wow it's almost like the /tnt/ stereotypes are complete bullshit or something
and it's not so much the "attempting to put chel in 2nd" that's a problem as the "letting a character go to finals and then disqualifying them". it doesn't matter if shirley was rigged or not. i think she was rigged. and her being rigged makes it worse because it means NSA let a character she knew was rigged into finals. but none of that matters. it doesn't change the fact that Fang never had a proper final round and NSA handed her a free win.
the fact that there are still people arguing about this shows that they're either complete tards or are being disingenuous.
No.106585
Anonymous
>>106572
I don’t think she’s a terrible winner, I just think the circumstances behind her win are terrible.
No.106586
Anonymous
Man if Nightshift only pulled the rug one round sooner then we wouldn't need this conversation
Chel was like 4 votes off from tieing why didn't you rig this one
No.106587
Anonymous
>>106586
ran out of accounts
No.106588
Anonymous
>>106586
Chel didn’t appeal enough to her campaigner tastes to get rigged over Shirley.
No.106589
Anonymous
>>106586
It's so strange how she just... didn't do anything to stop Shirley. It would have likely been mostly accepted by anons.
No.106592
Anonymous
Replies:>>106594
>Newfags forgetting that hosts were not allowed to remove any votes until asked to approve doing so
No.106594
Anonymous
>>106592
that vote was as much of a farce as everything else. she discarded the votes that told her not to discard votes. the whole thing was some half-baked trap to catch riggers.
No.106599
Anonymous
>>106586
Armstrong poster's fault.
No.106604
Anonymous
Replies:>>106605
>>106580
Look I was one of the Shirleybros but I was legitimately voting for her and supporting her campaign after the attention she was getting during her matchup with Jessica, it wasn't until the "accusations" dropped that I kept myself neutral about it and didn't vote.

Also do you even have anything to backup the idea of a Discord server, I have noted you're the only one who keeps spamming that and yet the only proof of Discordfags there is that Fangrigger from the Queen tournaments.
No.106605
Anonymous
>>106604
Funny because NSA is a discordfag herself
No.106627
Anonymous
Image:170927611415.jpg(242kB, 1125x433)34D6344D-6D41-4E89-893F-C8D3B1BB0C44.jpeg
In hindsight (lol) did this scene hurt or help fang?
No.106628
Anonymous
No.106629
Anonymous
>>106627
Absolutely help, even if it was more a fun bonus to joke about during the tournament.
No.106634
Anonymous
>>106627
It did nothing really.
No.106666
Anonymous
With the years of tournament evidence we can now say there’s three major indicators of success
>Widely associated with CN/AS
>Prominently aired during the late 90s/early 2000s
>Villain
Majority of winners cover all three, just about all cover two. Only one (Betty Boop) breaks the trend and covers none of these indicators but that is known as a fluke who slipped through during a major spite year. If you don’t cover any you simply will never win.
No.106669
Anonymous
>>106666
That sucks. But it is what it is.
No.106681
Anonymous
Replies:>>106685
No.106685
Anonymous
>>106681
Tom and Jerry aired on Cartoon Network (both owned by Warner Bros) in the late 90s/early 2000s
No.106686
Anonymous
>>106666
I shall now vote against any 90-2000s Cartoon Network & Adult Swim villains
No.106688
Anonymous
>>106686
Monarch bros…
No.106690
Anonymous
>>106686
Aku aspies…
No.106720
Anonymous
Image:170931641133.png(143kB, 800x600)marceline_dribbble.png
>>106666
>Marceline actually checks 1.5 of these boxes
I like those odds! Except she was made bi and paired up with the most controversial character in the series, which is like a -10 debuff.
No.106723
Anonymous
Replies:>>106724
>>106720
I'd say the dyke debuff is very damning but Harley made it to 5th place last year and all her recent stuff has her as a raging homo. Then again I'm pretty sure her voters were largely voting for BTAS Harley and not nu-harley, so maybe that's your ticket right there, just base your support for her exclusively on early season Adventure Time before they turned her into a dyke
No.106724
Anonymous
>>106723
When a character has a ton of existent popular legacy nu-variations, even if bad, aren’t really a factor.
No.106734
Anonymous
If the fated zoomer populace takeover of /co/ is ever going to happen, Marceline and other early 2010s picks are going to be the first to benefit from it
No.106737
Anonymous
Replies:>>106739
>>106734
By the time that happens we'll be in the non-canon years anyways.
No.106739
Anonymous
Replies:>>106741
>>106737
We’re a long while away from the Mr and Ms /co/ All Star Elite 128 tournaments
No.106741
Anonymous
>>106739
I kind of doubt these tourneys will last more than ~10 more years. Whether cause mods finally crack down, some epic drama shits all over it too hard, 4chan itself goes under, or it morphs into something largely unrecognizable to now.
No.106874
Anonymous
Replies:>>106875
>>106741
Never say never. /v/ the musical is still ongoing 10 years after the fact.
No.106875
Anonymous
>>106874
Nah. This shit has just a couple years at best. It's going to be completely ruined one way or another.
No.106876
Anonymous
Replies:>>106881
>>106741
To be honest, my gut is leaning on one of the last two scenarios.
No.106877
Anonymous
Replies:>>106878
>>106720
Granted, she still has a lot going for her even for people who loathe her pairing with Bonnie. For all the mixed impressions on later Adventure Time, the main five aside from PB were mostly received well from beginning to end. While the show hasn't had an elite yet, Marceline and Simon both do better than you'd think. Just to give credence to that, Simon made it to round 3 last year:
>facing campaign favorite Silver in Round 2
>having to face a huge powerhouse in Doof the third round
>dealing with FOTM spite from Fionna & Cake airing so close to the tournament
and biggest of all
>suffering from one of the worst anti-campaigns to date from the fucking fartfag
No.106878
Anonymous
>>106877
The fartfag actually helped him. They thought it was funny.
No.106879
Anonymous
Replies:>>106882
>>106734
they already have, why do you think early 2000s shows have advantages over other eras?
No.106881
Anonymous
>>106741
>>106876
4chan itself morphs into something unrecognizable. Actually, yeah, that sounds most likely.
No.106882
Anonymous
>>106879
zillenials aren't quit what's usually meant by zoomers.
No.106883
Anonymous
Replies:>>106886
>>106882
>zoomers aren't quite what's usually meant by zoomers
huh?
No.106886
Anonymous
Replies:>>106888
>>106883
2010's+ are usually what fall into 'zoomer media'.
No.106888
Anonymous
>>106886
You guys have a very erroneous and warped view of what media Gen Z enjoys and has been exposed to at large.
No.106984
Anonymous
Replies:>>107022
>>106882
"zillenial" is a stupid term and the fact that it's caught on drives me up the wall.
No.107017
Anonymous
>People said Fang was the heavy favorite to win, she won, and most people were not seething about it.
Do you anons agree with this statement?
No.107018
Anonymous
Replies:>>107212
>>107017
they were seething but mainly because of the whole Chel Shirley thing
No.107022
Anonymous
>>106984
zoomer itself is a stupid term.
No.107061
Anonymous
>>107017
The people seething were and still are a vocal minority, so everything said by
>>107017
is true
No.107208
Anonymous
Image:170951183818.png(42kB, 604x486)stast.PNG
Any conclusions?
No.107209
Anonymous
>>107208
We need more friendly buff dudes as winners.
No.107211
Anonymous
Image:170951203157.png(277kB, 426x600)mr incredible.png
>>107209
...
No.107212
Anonymous
Replies:>>107218
>>107017
>>107018
you can go look at the 2022 afterparty threads and plainly see that the seething was nuclear and a good chunk of people wanted Fang to have an *
considering NSA's penchant for samefagging it's likely that the support for Fang's win has been overestimated
No.107213
Anonymous
Image:170951213616.png(169kB, 360x406)Mr-Incredible-GD.png
>>107209
...
No.107217
Anonymous
Image:170951288908.gif(1.38MB, 498x373)Spoiler image
>>107209
No.107218
Anonymous
Replies:>>107230
>>107212
Good chunk =/= most people
No.107230
Anonymous
>>107218
i'm sayin "a good chunk" to be generous. go look at the thread.
No.107231
Anonymous
please never use good chunk again
No.107242
Anonymous
Image:170951771046.png(90kB, 527x193)1591185822355.png
>>106572
>>107017
Dude what is it with you and Fang? Do you want people to tell you everyone likes her? That's not true and will never be true, if not because of the handling of the circumstances of her win, then because a dinosaur winning a beauty pageant was always bound to be controversial. But also, she won and no amount of seething will change that, just like with other controversial winners like Recette. Is this not enough for you and you want some extra validation?
No.107328
Anonymous
>>107208
Why Tom got Chris Benoit'd?
No.107332
Anonymous
Image:170952627578.png(202kB, 537x663)A lonely ghost.png
>>107208
Anyways, I still think Wuya is a great winner but, man it does suck she's forever tied to NSA's bullshittery.
No.107350
Anonymous
>>107242
I won't be satisfied until everyone loves Fang as much as I do. She's a truly special winner.
No.107354
Anonymous
I won't be satisfied until everyone loves Spinel as much as I do. She's a truly special winner.
No.107355
Anonymous
Replies:>>107357
I won't be satisfied until everyone hates the winners as much as I do. They're all truly shit winners.
No.107357
Anonymous
>>107355
Fangbro btw
No.107358
Anonymous
Image:170952865358.jpg(657kB, 959x2609)the mighty score.jpg
I won't be satisfied until everyone accepts the fact Bejita being undefeated against TARDku thrice also means he's undefeated against every single character TARDku faced THRICE.
No.107366
Anonymous
>>107242
You replied to multiple people there anon
No.107370
Anonymous
>>107242
Replying to diferent people. I made the second post when someone in the Controversial Opinions thread was attempting to assert that Fang is NOT a controversial winner (something that even her fans as evidenced by the first quoted post often disagree with).
No.107377
Anonymous
Replies:>>107378
>>107370
And for the record I also didn’t make that post in the controversial opinions thread

>>107242


I’m mostly tired of /tnt/ bitching about everything that isn’t their absolute gold standard. We get a powerhouse that still makes up the plurality of the booru and had a massive campaign and /tnt/ still hates her.

Even things like who the characters were created by or circumstances beyond the tournament and used against characters. It just feels needlessly petty.
No.107378
Anonymous
>>107377
I will complain until there is finally a gold standard ms. /co/.
No.107379
Anonymous
>>107370
But she's not a controversial winner. Almost everyone loves her and the people who don't are a vocal minority.
No.107380
Anonymous
>>107379
I think the only legit complain which I personally agree is that she depended a lot on Primal's new season airing at the time, which gave her a massive boost because the second season was everywhere.
No.107381
Anonymous
>>107380
She would've stomped even without that.
No.107384
Anonymous
Replies:>>107387
>>107379
I know you’re being sarcastic but those are not mutually exclusive. Fang won all her matches by almost a 60% average and has the most OC of ANY other character in Ms by far. You don’t get that without being loved in some way.

However, there is that other 40% that mostly hates her, which would make it a vocal minority. Therefore Fang is loved by a lot of people, however she is controversial and has a decent amount of haters at the very least.

t. Fangfag
No.107385
Anonymous
Replies:>>107388
Fang has to have generated more retrospective discussion than any other /co/ tourney winner.
No.107386
Anonymous
>>107380
You’re right it probably provided a boost. But remember her 2020 performance was very similar and that was when her show wasn’t airing at all and only had five episodes.
No.107387
Anonymous
>>107384
I wasn't being sarcastic.
No.107388
Anonymous
Replies:>>107390
>>107385
Nope. Spinel is still just as talked about.
No.107390
Anonymous
>>107388
I don't know. Opinions on Spinel are pretty clear. Discussion is just kind of naunces of how she's bad and ruined the tourneys. Fang still seems to get a bunch of back-and-forth.
No.107391
Anonymous
Replies:>>107392
>Jenny
>Spinel
Diet loli winners.
No.107392
Anonymous
Replies:>>107393
>>107391
Don’t bring that shit here
No.107393
Anonymous
>>107392
Anon he is baiting you.
No.107784
Anonymous
Replies:>>107787
Krillin should be next Mr. /co/.... I love him...
No.107787
Anonymous
>>107784
Bejita...
No.107795
Anonymous
>the last bunch of murderdrones general OPs have been straight up porn, including multiple vore images
They’re not doing ok
No.107798
Anonymous
>>107795
Wait what?
No.107799
Anonymous
Replies:>>107804
>>107795
>/a/ has /dbs/
>/v/ has the /v/ touhou threads
>/co/ has...
Does murderdrones count?
No.107800
Anonymous
I think you are giving MD more attention than it deserves.
No.107801
Anonymous
>>107795
>Glitch says next episode will be delayed only a few months
>Murderfags have an absolute schizo mental breakdown
Yep that sounds like them lol
No.107802
Anonymous
genuinely rent free
No.107804
Anonymous
>>107799
/co/ *had* /hsg/ (Homestuck General), which was arguably the most autistic general the board ever conceived and mostly puts all the others that came after it to shame.
No.107807
Anonymous
Replies:>>107809
>>107804
/mlp/ is basically one giant /co/ general that needed it’s own board and is the unbeatable all time champ of autism.
No.107808
Anonymous
>>107804
To remind you how autistic /hsg/ was:
Not only did the topic get banned from /co/ but the general managed to get banned from /trash/. I cannot think of a single other series that managed to accomplish anything like it
No.107809
Anonymous
>>107807
Yeah but as far as distuptive fandoms that didn't get their own board goes there's Homestuck.
No.107810
Anonymous
Replies:>>107817
>>107808
And before someone says the low hanging obvious fruit of horses, MLP never got banned from /trash/ and posts are still made there
No.107811
Anonymous
We need an autism tournament. Finalists are MLP and homestuck
No.107815
Anonymous
Fun Fact: Thanks to Temp, we now know the dude who softbanned Homestuck due to getting cucked is apparently also the guy who tried getting Tournaments banned sitewide
No.107817
Anonymous
>>107810
Homestuck can be dispensed with entirely because it's still relatively manageable (though apparently they would still sneak on /co/ from time to time). Horses were so prevalent and persistent they have to be given some containment.
No.107818
Anonymous
>>107815
That really explains a lot.
No.107819
Anonymous
>>107815
I remember pointing that out but I would guess not a lot of people here are familiar with Homestuck let alone care about it.
No.107820
Anonymous
Replies:>>107821
>>107815
Fusefag?
No.107821
Anonymous
>>107820
lol no, we are talking about someone in the moderation team.
No.107823
Anonymous
>>107815
God imagine the level of seething he has when tournaments get to run and he can’t do shit about it
No.107826
Anonymous
>>107815
>Stats cucked that same mod sometime after Mr. /co/ 2020 and that's why Ms. /co/ 2021 was banned at first
No.107852
Anonymous
Replies:>>107856
>>107808
homestuck did not get banned for being cancerous, that's bullshit. it got banned because of one powertripping mod.
No.107856
Anonymous
Replies:>>107858
>>107852
Does anyone know the name?
No.107858
Anonymous
Replies:>>107880
No.107880
Anonymous
>>107858
evil fucken company
No.107923
Anonymous
Replies:>>107925
>>106741
I thought the same thing a few years back, but despite cheating hosts, verifiably rigged champions like Spinel, mod persecution, meta-gaming and spite voting, a tournament with email verification, etc. Anything I could think of that would have destroyed these tournaments and disillusioned voters has already occurred, and despite it all people still keep showing up year after year. If the transition of power from NSA to the new host is successful, then I think they'll be well and truly unkillable. These things will be going on until 4chan itself goes under, and even then some people will keep trying to do it here for a few years after that.

>>105266
There are a lot of characters from the 2010s that I think would be worthy of Mr. /co/ E8 as animation reps, but they either don't have much campaigning or /co/ is still tsundere about their endings
>Rango, Emmet from the Lego Movie, any of the Regular Show or AT guys, Hiccup, Garden Wall brothers, Grunkle Stan
2020s is trickier because the pandemic ruined a lot of production in the industry, and the few shows that are being made now either female led or reboots. The 'big new cartoon IP' of the 2020s has yet to establish itself. As of now I guess the Smiling Friends are the best rep for the decade.
No.107925
Anonymous
>>107923
All of those suck.
No.107926
Anonymous
Replies:>>107931
>>107925
At minimum, how does Rango suck?
No.107927
Anonymous
>>107925
Oh I’m sure this post is in no way dishonest and looking in the direction of causing fake outrage.
No.107931
Anonymous
>>107926
I was exaggerating a bit but respectfully, I don't see him as winner material at all. He's not very funny, he's not cool, his movie was good but I don't even remember the last time that was talked about ever. He doesn't have any memorable campaigns. He couldn't even compare to a lower tier Mr. winner like Kronk. Those other examples aren't much better either. They're nothing more than just "fine".
No.107934
Anonymous
>>107931
This post wasn't written by someone who watched or understood Rango.
No.107937
Anonymous
Image:170972237755.jpg(3.80MB, 4032x1908)0d50def6f5232c4cb12b67d58863a1bdf0a57777.jpeg
>>107931
>He doesn't have any memorable campaigns
He has among the most notable campaigning moments in the history of the tournaments you imbecile.
No.107938
Anonymous
Zoomer characters shouldn't win and ruin the /co/ tournaments too.
No.107943
Anonymous
Replies:>>107978
Image:170972541477.jpg(32kB, 564x556)09c202529ab75f94129c8e922bb6c0f4.jpg
https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/Statistic_Records
>Jessica and Chel have among the highest statistical win/loss ratios
>They both nearly tie each other
I really wonder how much deeper run Jessica Rabbit would've done if she had not had the unluckiest brackets all the time.
No.107945
Anonymous
Replies:>>107954
>>107938
The zoomer takeover is inevitable, cope
No.107951
Anonymous
Replies:>>107954
>>107938
but Fang did
No.107954
Anonymous
>>107945
8th place is as far as you're going to get, lil zoom zoom.
>>107951
>Primal
>zoomer
No zoomer ever watched this. It's a millennial show through and through.
No.107956
Anonymous
>He’s seething over the inevitable generation replacement agaih
No.107961
Anonymous
That guy from the other day really was onto something when he said there has been a surge in bad faith posting.
No.107963
Anonymous
We discussed how the Mr /co/ 2023 qualifiers were weirdly low and Black Hat was suspiciously just getting enough votes to qualify but i don’t think anyone brought up that another of NSA’s picks in Zim was the top seed
It’s looking more likely that NSA kept every vote that voted for Zim and Black Hat, and removed every vote that didn’t vote for either until votes were low enough Black Hat had enough to qualify
No.107964
Anonymous
>>107938
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL0LwTlXY9Q
No.107965
Anonymous
Replies:>>107967
>>107963
That would explain why the vote count was /tnt/ tier.
No.107966
Anonymous
>>107963
Interesting theory. I did notice that "coincidence" about Zim's placement but didn't bring it up since he has always seeded very high.
No.107967
Anonymous
Replies:>>107968
>>107965
>AEW out of nowhere
Foaz
No.107968
Anonymous
>>107967
WWE fucking WON
No.107969
Anonymous
Replies:>>107974
>>107968
..... the KWAB contest
No.107970
Anonymous
>>107968
That EVIL FUCKEN COMPANY LOST
Tony and AEW WON
No.107971
Anonymous
Replies:>>107972
>>107963
No, I don't believe NSA rigged for Zim.
Zim as a character has always had a high seed and I reckon for a good reason as Invader Zim is well liked on /co/. For the record here's the stats for zim

>2018, wasn't nominated
>2019, 2nd seed 134 votes
>2020, 12th seed 112 votes
>2021, 11th seed 161 votes
>2022, 2nd seed 196 votes
>2023, 1st seed 70 votes?
In 2023, he ironically enough had the least amount of votes.
No.107972
Anonymous
Image:170973498526.jpg(49kB, 800x580)46494395_2281442405200369_8593733031011811328_n.jpg
>>107971
>Literally more than two times fall-off in votes
What the fuck was NSA doing?
No.107974
Anonymous
>>107969
K, b, c.
No.107976
Anonymous
If you want to get really conspiracy the overlap of comic voters who vote JJJ and also Zim or Black Hat is probably very low
No.107977
Anonymous
Replies:>>107986
We have to remember NSA probably also moved votes so Battler would lose by one vote, King Boo's humiliation in qualifiers and duck match just for the sake of a reaction
No.107978
Anonymous
Replies:>>107982
>>107943
And people will still call Johanna a jobber for losing to a powerhouse like Jessica who has a higher win ratio than every single winner.
Also why is Garland listed as the 33rd seed when the year he won he was the 5th seed?
No.107982
Anonymous
Image:170974175409.jpg(23kB, 563x305)7ca7fec4d2a6b39d12425ae8c83fd0b3.jpg
>>107978
Jessica Rabbit is one of those characters who has a very high likely-hood of taking the crown when she breaks her non-elite status and gets a proper campaign. Although she will have to contend with the likes of Chel and seeing her bracket luck, It might make her lose early again.
No.107986
Anonymous
>>107977
Well shit
No.107988
Anonymous
Haha wouldn’t it be funny if Battler actually did win those matches and NSA intentionally made him lose because they were very close?
No.108060
Anonymous
>Error: This CAPTCHA is no longer valid because it has expired. Please try again.
Anyone else having this problem on /co/?
No.108068
Anonymous
Stealtho threado?
https://boards.4chan.org/co/thread/142579600
No.108075
Anonymous
>>108068
Not stealthy.
No.108150
Anonymous
Replies:>>108152
>>108068
>RWBY shitter so dimeless it kills the thread
No.108152
Anonymous
No.108705
Anonymous
Replies:>>108773
>kills the /tnt/ thread too
No.108773
Anonymous
Replies:>>108819
>>108705
the controversial opinions thread has basically become the new offseason general. It's sucking up traffic from the king/queen thread too.
No.108806
Anonymous
Image:171001275716.jpg(49kB, 927x862)ruby_rose_as_death_at_the_cemetary_by_the0118_dfghvam-pre.jpg
No.108807
Anonymous
Image:171001389525.jpg(29kB, 564x564)5cb518fe34fd01d3de78a4175ab91106.jpg
A curious question that got to me is what other attribute does Black Canary have aside from her sexy looks? Does she have a deep backstory, a cool personality or a mix of both?

There should be a reason why she has made it to the Elite Eight.
No.108810
Anonymous
Image:171001617726.jpg(285kB, 1000x1537)22E6C31D-C05D-4DEE-A7D9-1D4551FD68EB.jpeg
>>108807
she was the only smart one in Heroes in Crisis
No.108812
Anonymous
Replies:>>108817
>>108807
>There should be a reason why she has made it to the Elite Eight.
Hype over somehow beating the 2nd seed. Honestly glad she made Elite 8 in retrospect even after Villains of /co/ Comicfags get no respect nowadays
No.108813
Anonymous
Replies:>>108817
>>108807
The voterbase back then probably just happened to be comprised of comicfags who were horny for her.
No.108817
Anonymous
Replies:>>108900
>>108812
>>108813
It is still kinda of a headache on how the hell she managed to beat Jessica Rabbit.

Lets actually have a civil discussion about this, Black Canary was the 66th seed, while as previously said, Jessica had the 2nd highest seed meaning she was one of the strongest contestants in that years tourney. This isn't just a baseless statement either, Jessica holds the second highest landslide win out of any character in the tournaments at 88.0% which happened in this very edition of the tourney. While the winner was the 37th seed Jenny, 5 out of 8 elites were on the top 10 seeds (Exceptions being Jenny of course, Toph who went to be 1st seed on 2020, and Black Canary).

We know that Jessica hasn't made it to E8 yet but this is purely due to her having the unluckiest brackets out of any contestants in history of these tournaments. Peridot in 2019 was the second most rigged character in the tourney just behind Spinel, Kim Possible is a two time 3rd placer, Hilda was a favorite to the spite mob, Shirley needs no introduction and Frankie is a silent powerhouse who's made it to the 3rd place in 2019 and consistently scores high seeds since her debut.
Jessica either loses to rigging or powerhouses, Black Canary in hindsight is a total anomaly. I wouldn't be writing this if Black Canary would've been a regular tourney contestants, but she hasn't qualified ever since.
No.108819
Anonymous
Image:171002021991.jpg(24kB, 600x688)ea85b7fed5d3b7886b1e5fa114c5b3c5.jpg
>>108773
It pretty much sums up the entire board, doesn't it?
No.108900
Anonymous
>>108817
Sometimes a weird surprise just happens. Probably a combo of comicfags being a stronger force, Jessica being 2nd seed and having stomped her previous opponent so a perception she was unbeatable and too obvious, coomers, and general oddness with a smaller voter group in a first year tourney. It was a narrow loss.
No.108905
Anonymous
Image:171008039866.jpg(678kB, 2048x1536)2168707E-A169-4891-8B34-96730041EB17.jpeg
What are the chances of Star Defneders making into the bracket?
No.108906
Anonymous
>>108905
1%
Only 1% because I said Murder Drones had a 0% chance last year and underestimated the amount of autists into it
No.108907
TheJudge
>>108905
Space King fans are quite literally either zoomies or 40kfags, usually both. But they seem to not as obnoxious as MDfags and at times even funny.
No.108908
Anonymous
Replies:>>108909
>>108907
Oh man, I gave away my identity lmao
No.108909
Anonymous
Replies:>>108910
>>108908
Still less embarrassing than NSA forgetting to turn his trip off while shilling for Black Hat
No.108910
Anonymous
>>108909
Or NSA sharing his Discord fucking everywhere,
No.108911
Anonymous
>>108907
QUICK EVERYONE NOMINATE MURDER DRONES & 4OK LOLIES
No.108915
Anonymous
>>108905
Slim, though if they do make it in they might not get as much since 40k has a sizable fandom on the site.
No.108957
Anonymous
>>108905
FOTM, if even
No.108961
Anonymous
Replies:>>109018
What the fuck is the deal with RWBY anyways? I know their indie zoomer shit but they were a pretty big fandom with a long-running presence on /co/. You would think at least someone would QUALIFY over the years. Is it really just a giga example of an enclosed fandom?
No.109018
Anonymous
Replies:>>109020
>>108961
They are a very self contained general and once moved to /trash/ continue their general nonstop until a new season is close to release (which is now never kek). They are very heavy into waifus without thinking the show is good and a lot are likely /a/ posters and not the usual /co/ crowd and aren't into usual /co/ content.
Even so, they have to be the biggest jobbers of all time with the amount of posters they have and comments they make. Ignoring /co/ or not there's zero reason for a show with 2500 general threads and counting to not qualify for a single tournament ever, including during 2018 when there was no competition. Basically every show that wasn't a complete wash of disinterest had at least one character qualify around the time it airs if not more, and Rwby should have a yearly representation if they weren't jobbers.
No.109020
Anonymous
>>109018
I think it can officially be said they're the biggest jobbers in (/co/) history. Even the fucking Loudfags QUALIFIED once or twice.
No.109036
Anonymous
since he won an Oscar I might as well ask how Godzilla didn't qualify last year when he appeared in every year prior
No.109039
Anonymous
>anime beat all western toons for the oscar
/co/bro's...
No.109040
Anonymous
>>109039
expected, I didn't like Spider-Verse 2
No.109041
Anonymous
Replies:>>109051
Image:171012554054.jpg(364kB, 1137x847)1710124160574520.jpg
>>109040
oh no no no
No.109042
Anonymous
>>109039
But War Is Over! Inspired by the Music of John & Yoko won best animated short?
No.109050
Anonymous
>>109039
>>109040
I really enjoyed the movie, but I still believe The Boy and the Heron was the right choice. Besides, even on a basic level one is a historic director's possibly final project while the other is literally the first half of a two-parter. If Beyond the Spider-Verse sticks the landing, that should be the one to actually win.
No.109051
Anonymous
>>109041
I had to look into this, and he outright said right after this that he was being a sore loser. Still a dumb response, but I guess he's self-aware about it?

For comparison sake, Christopher Miller outright said he didn't mind losing to Miyazaki of all people.
No.109054
Anonymous
So now that the dust has settled, what caused the Fall of MILFs after 2021? You used to see MILFs as powerhouses in Ms. /co/ with like Johanna making it to finals and Elastigirl being a heavy hitter, but now in 2023 with big names like Dexter's Mom losing round 2 and Aunt Cass not qualifying, and Maria Rivera losing by the most out of any character, has /co/'s preferences just shifted away from mature women and towards younger girls?
No.109055
Anonymous
No.109059
Anonymous
>>109054
Johanna being the “powerhouse” candidate kinda shows it, so do how you mention those others as the other big examples.
MILFs are kinda boring personality wise and there aren’t really any heavy hitters or super notable ones that would make continuous runs. It’s less no one likes them and more there aren’t really any viable candidates strong enough for a run after Johanna burned hers
No.109060
Anonymous
>>109054
Johanna's run really should be taken into serious calculations.
No.109064
Anonymous
>2024
>still giving the Oscars any real merit or value, especially in regards to the animation category
No.109065
Anonymous
Replies:>>109066
>>109064
t. Miles Morales
No.109066
Anonymous
>>109065
I think Spiderverse is dogshit in anything that isn't the visuals departament. It's still incredibly silly to take the Oscars as an authority on quality.
No.109067
Anonymous
>>109054
With the exception of Johanna, none of those even have campaigns so how should that even be a surprise? If there was a good MILF with a good campaign then she would get my vote. Also /v/ has better MILFs.
No.109068
Anonymous
Replies:>>109072
>>109054
If we're being real technical, Mrs. Brisby exists?
No.109069
Anonymous
Replies:>>109072
>>109054
Fang is a MILF and won 2022
No.109070
Anonymous
Replies:>>109071
>>109064
Godzilla won and that’s all that matters
No.109071
Anonymous
Replies:>>109080
>>109070
>Godzilla could sweep the /m/ tournament if it happened
Goddammit why can’t it just be a thing
No.109072
Anonymous
Replies:>>109075
>>109068
>>109069
Rigged year, doesn't count.
No.109073
Anonymous
Replies:>>109074
>>109054
Vexus fits the definition and she seems to turn in pretty decent performances every year.
No.109074
Anonymous
>>109073
I feel like her status as a robo trumps her status as a MILF.
No.109075
Anonymous
Replies:>>109076
>>109072
Every year is rigged.
No.109076
Anonymous
>>109075
Then why do we participate in the first place?
No.109077
Anonymous
Image:171014857427.png(218kB, 775x775)LifeShrug.png
>>109076
No.109078
Anonymous
>>109076
Ask people why they enjoy professional wrestling even though they know it's scripted, you'll get the same answer
No.109080
Anonymous
>>109071
I still wonder why that guy started hosting it only to leave with no word before it got to round 1.
No.109083
Anonymous
they removed IP counts...how are we supposed to know how dead the tournaments are now?
No.109085
Anonymous
Replies:>>109086
No.109086
Anonymous
Replies:>>109088
Image:171016625152.jpg(69kB, 544x299)SameCHADlers.jpg
>>109083
>>109085
>it's real
>4chan actually removed the poster count
SameCHADS WON.
No.109087
Anonymous
>>109083
>they actually did
lmao
No.109088
Anonymous
Replies:>>109369
Image:171016634206.png(25kB, 360x420)worry.png
>>109086
But, why?
No.109089
Anonymous
Lovely, as if the hobby boards already didn't have a problem with chronic samefagging and astroturfing.
No.109097
Anonymous
>They removed the IP counter
What the fuck is wrong with the staff?
No.109114
Anonymous
>>109083
What has been going on with the site the past few months? They are changing so much.
No.109249
Anonymous
Image:171022722453.jpg(252kB, 471x998)18C2C41F-0396-49DE-A960-A36D03B01AE1.jpeg
>MDfags are posting vore again
Not beating the schizo allegations
No.109252
Anonymous
>>109249
I literally never seen any MDfag say they weren't a schizo.
No.109288
Anonymous
Replies:>>109305
murder drones lives in this dude's head rent free
No.109305
Anonymous
Replies:>>109306
>>109288
>post vore in the OP of your general repeatedly
>”wow they’re posting vore again”
>”heh, rent free”
No.109306
Anonymous
>>109305
>see weird thread on /co/
>make post about it on a completely different website
>"yep, this is normal"
No.109308
Anonymous
>>109249
Nfags do be like that tho
No.109322
Anonymous
Replies:>>109339
Y'know if you think about it Black Canary is technically the first campooner pick
No.109339
Anonymous
>>109322
I don't remember if she had any campaign.
No.109358
Anonymous
Replies:>>109364
>>109339
No shit, Its been 6 years since she last qualified. People barely remember what happened in 2021.
No.109364
Anonymous
Replies:>>109367
>>109358
I'm basically asking if she was really a campooner pick.
No.109367
Anonymous
Replies:>>109371
>>109364
>>109339
Campaigns in 2018 were barely a thing
No.109369
Anonymous
Image:171028778853.jpg(79kB, 470x352)TimeShed.jpg
>>109088
*blink* Because we're all us.
No.109371
Anonymous
>>109367
Then tell the anon calling her a campooner.
No.109378
Anonymous
Image:171029111725.png(40kB, 119x220)ena.PNG
which returning character are you most excited for?
i cannot wait to support ENA again
No.109380
Anonymous
Replies:>>109382
Image:171029195359.png(262kB, 512x512)523731213.png
>>109378
Jessica Rabbit has gone under radar for far too long and she needs to have a proper year where she shines as a contestant.
No.109382
Anonymous
Replies:>>109385
>>109380
good choice. i'm also eager to see what JJJ's been cooking up after his unfortunate exclusion last year
No.109383
Anonymous
Replies:>>109384
>>109378
That has a realistic chance of winning? Nobody.
No.109384
Anonymous
>>109383
what about the ones who don't have a chance?
No.109385
Anonymous
Replies:>>109387
>>109382
I plan on writefagging a bunch for him this year unless Harvey Birdman manages to qualify again.
No.109386
Anonymous
Mandela catalogue lost
No.109387
Anonymous
>>109385
brb rigging out harvey birdman
No.109390
Anonymous
Replies:>>109392
Squidward lost
No.109392
Anonymous
Image:171029607872.jpg(28kB, 480x360)the king.jpg
>>109390
Squidward won