/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Thread stats: 665 posts, 48 files (48 image(s))

Replying to /tnt/205694
Options
No.205694
/TNT/-Tournament General #10Anonymous
Replies:>>207934
Image:175674462715.jpg(223kB, 1200x675)gcFR5soyBCbWtJboWKeKqY-1200-80.jpg
Legends Never Die edition.
Previous thread:
>>194340
Tourney Wiki:
>4tourney.wikitide.org

TOURNAMENT HAPPENINGS:
>ms. /co/ 2025 on September 5th
No.205695
Anonymous
Let's start this thread with a good opener:
What are some of the best winners ever?
No.205696
Anonymous
>>205695
Shadow
No.205697
Anonymous
>>205695
>ms.
Frankie
>mr.
Spider-Man
>queen
Curly
>king
Dante

Do we include the side tourneys too?
No.205700
Anonymous
Replies:>>205701
>>205697
Side tourneys aren't real tourneys.
No.205701
Anonymous
>>205700
Fair enough.
No.205702
Anonymous
>>205697
the /trash/ ones aren't side tourneys.
No.205703
Anonymous
>>205697
I don't see why not
No.205704
Anonymous
>>205702
Well on that topic, I guess it's Tyr for the female tournament and I'm not sure that's for coom reasons and just because I liked her in Duck Dodgers.
The male tournament only has one winner so there's not exactly options.
No.205705
Anonymous
>ANOTHER capeshit OP
Can we not for once?
No.205706
Anonymous
Replies:>>205707
>>205702
They're not main one's either. This place constantly gassing them to be the same tier as /co/ and /v/ is stupid.
No.205707
Anonymous
Replies:>>205708
>>205706
>still seething over Death winning
No.205708
Anonymous
Replies:>>205710
>>205707
I couldn't give a fuck (or fap) what the gay tourney elects.
No.205710
Anonymous
Replies:>>205711
>>205708
You are quite literally getting mad over furries.
No.205711
Anonymous
Replies:>>205713
>>205710
How is that what you glean from my post?
No.205713
Anonymous
Replies:>>205716
>>205711
>furry tournaments don't count because…they just don't okay?!
No.205714
Anonymous
don't feed the trolls
ignore him, he's trying to start a meltdown over shit nobody seriously has issue with again
No.205715
Anonymous
Personally I never got the point of tournaments on /aco/ and /trash/.
No.205716
Anonymous
Replies:>>205819
>>205713
Because they're small. I would've said the same thing if it wasn't a furry tourney.
If the tourney cannot average at least 300 votes per round it shouldn't count with the "big four."
>now inb4 Mr. get less than 300 this year.
No.205717
Anonymous
Predicted vote counts this year:
>Ms. /co/: 450
>Mr. /co/: 250 or barely 300
>Queen: 750
>King: 600
No.205718
Anonymous
Replies:>>205720
If a board's tournament has gone on for 3+ years at this point, can it really be called a side tourney?
No.205720
Anonymous
>>205718
Aren't "side tourneys" just tourneys that happen in attached relation to a bigger one? (i.e. bottom, barred, tag team and co-op too I guess). I think the better distinction for things like /an/ and such is minor and major tourneys.
No.205724
Anonymous
>>205720
The parallel to major league and minor league in sports is quite fitting.
No.205728
Anonymous
Image:175675665219.jpg(1,008kB, 1911x1080)IMG_3312.jpeg
Ryu’s /cov/ victory might’ve fucked Ken over at Co-op, but dreams never die.
No.205733
Anonymous
Replies:>>205780
>>205720
Yeah, I'd say the /co/ and /v/ tourneys are the main ones, Playboy and Tag Team the minor ones, and Bottom/Barred the side tourneys
No.205749
Anonymous
Replies:>>205753
No.205753
Anonymous
>>205749
He would actually be a good winner.
No.205780
Anonymous
>>205733
Pretty much this.
I can understand the case for things like the team tourneys and /an/lympics being discussed with the big four as long as no one is treating them as such (they often share hosts with the main ones, the Wiki front page acknowledges them, blahblahblah), but trying to group Barred and Bottom with these is getting too far and should be viewed as nothing more than side acts.
No.205806
Anonymous
Replies:>>205811
Image:175677113286.jpg(338kB, 1019x757)1752861147796225.jpg
main tournaments must be held on 4chan and must not overlap with existing main tournaments. so /co/, /v/, /an/, /mlp/, and /his/. a good rule of thumb is that candidates will only be eligible in one main tournament, though obviously there are exceptions.
minor tournaments either overlap with the subject matter (/aco/ and /trash/ tournaments) or they are held on /tnt/.
side tournaments are offshoots of existing tournaments. they occur at the same time and use the same threads.
No.205808
Anonymous
>>205705
Kingbro btw
No.205810
Anonymous
>>205705
No need to say that about Capcom, anon.
No.205811
Anonymous
Replies:>>205814
>>205806
Ain't no way /an/ or /his/ is practically the same tiered status as /co/ or /v/. I still think the main marker should be voter count and activity.
No.205814
Anonymous
Replies:>>205815
>>205811
/an/ and /his/ are smaller boards, of course they're not gonna have as many voters
they only feel like a sideshow because there's no meta for /tnt/ to circlejerk over
No.205815
Anonymous
>>205814
They feel like sideshows cause they're small. Small = minor. Minor tourneys.
No.205819
Anonymous
>>205716
After the shitstorm that happened with the staff on April we will be lucky if we get 300 if the raid from sharty didn't fend off the regular lurkers.
No.205820
Anonymous
>>205717
I don't see how getting less than 500 is bad. We're talking about threads who had an ip count of already 200 people posting and a lot of them most likely using alternate accounts. If anything less than 500 is the right amount to define the thread is voting. Of course not /co/ or /v/ general vote in these tourneys but you get the point.
No.205821
Anonymous
>>205820
By the latter I obviously mean that of course not the other lurkers who are in the other threads are gonna pay attention to the tourneys and vote. Unfortunately these tourneys never get the vote of absolute everyone in the board but just a bunch of us who are still in touch with them.
No.205822
Anonymous
why not:
>main board tournament
>off-board tournament
>side tournament
main can be for all on 4chan, off-board can be for /tnt/ and side tournaments can be from either site and are attached to a bigger tournament?
No.205823
Anonymous
>>205822
Cause again, just putting all "main board" tourneys together now levels an event like /his/ that gets 20 voters and one thread with an even like Queen that gets 1000+ voters a 100+ threads.
No.205824
Anonymous
>>205820
I don't know why it keeps being assumed the thread post count is so indicative to the voter count. There's nothing unrealistic to me that the active thread posters are only like 40% of total voters. You constantly have "silent powerhouses" that no one actively supports or even mentions getting far.
No.205825
Anonymous
Image:175677797939.jpg(96kB, 810x720)spiderman.jpg
>>205822
I agree with this. However off-board and side tourneys should be just for the tag-team tourneys and second tournaments like Heroes and Villains. The other tournaments like /his/, /trash/ and /an/ should count as main as they take place in their respective boards. It doesn't matter the vote difference because we know the reason is because not a lot are aware of the existence of a few of these new tourneys.
No.205826
Anonymous
Replies:>>205827
>>205825
You forgot /m/
No.205827
Anonymous
Replies:>>205830
>>205826
That shit was cancelled by the jannies
No.205828
Anonymous
Replies:>>205831
>>205825
that's actually a good point that I missed, main tournaments take place ON their main boards and voter count isn't really a factor
No.205830
Anonymous
Replies:>>205833
>>205827
....................Why?
No.205831
Anonymous
Replies:>>205832
>>205825
>>205828
Just split up "Main" category into "major" and "minor." I don't know why we want to completely ignore the division between tiny and giant tourneys that get way more attention and content.
No.205832
Anonymous
Replies:>>205837
>>205831
It would be too cliche if we only consider the /co/ and /v/ tourneys as the only 4 main tournaments, We should but adding some more doesn't hurt the importance of /co/ and /v/ tourneys. I know /his/, /trash/ and /an/ don't get that much attraction let alone for some being too new but they still take place in their respective boards whatsoever.
No.205833
Anonymous
>>205830
Didn't the organizer bail?
No.205834
Anonymous
Replies:>>205839
>people just finding out /m/ tournament was cancelled
No.205837
Anonymous
>>205832
>too cliche
What? Why would it matter?
Also not even what I'm saying. You can call a tourney "main" but also "minor" under all these categories. I don't get insisting they're all equal when there's obviously a massive difference between them.
No.205838
Anonymous
>>205837
stop trying to min/max tournaments lmao
#alltournamentsarevalid
No.205839
Anonymous
>>205834
I thought this was common knowledge, it was posted about pretty frequently in 2023.
No.205842
Anonymous
>>205837
I just personally think the category shouldn't be necessary. A lot of the differences come from the amount of voters around which not a lot are aware of these others. Other than that, it's not much different.
No.205845
Anonymous
>>205842
It's seems pretty straightforward and common sense. Dinky loosely put together events with a few dozen circlejerkers and single threads vs. massive organized events with several hundreds of anons and tons of OC and off-season hype and discussion and meta. Does using more than one axis just blow your mind?
No.205846
Anonymous
Replies:>>205848
Just call them board tournaments.
No.205848
Anonymous
>>205846
Boardies for short.
No.205849
Anonymous
ngl this just feels like some people reeeaaaally wanting to have their tiny pet favorite tourneys thought of on the same level as the big old founding four in the inter-meta tourney autist-verse.
No.205850
Anonymous
>>205849
I honestly forget /an/ and /his/ tournaments even exist sometimes.
No.205851
Anonymous
Replies:>>205864
>>205842
>it's not much different other than this factor that makes them hugely different
No.205852
Anonymous
I think the only tourneys that can really stand with /co/ and /v/ in terms of numbers and fanfare are the hypothetical /a/ and /tv/ ones, both of which seem impossible to get started and just disappear into aether whenever anything seems to get going about it.
No.205853
Anonymous
Replies:>>205854
>>205849
This desu. Whole thing sounds like an anon really wanting a meme pick like Anon's Budgerigar Birb to be discussed alongside other "le ebin winners" like Johnny Bravo or Dante but is insecure about smaller tourneys.
No.205854
Anonymous
>>205853
It kind of misses the point that these are CHARACTER contest and trying to replicate that with general plants and animals won't have the same effect as using fictional characters.
No.205855
Anonymous
Replies:>>205910
>>205852
/trash/ got like ~80 votes a round average? /an/ was about the same and so are the side tourneys here. /his/ is at the low end of about ~25.
Mr. gets about ~400, Ms ~700, King ~800, Queen ~1000. /mlp/ is kind of hard to find the data but looks like about ~100?
If I could guess at hypothetical numbers for other proposed tourneys:
>/a/ (female): ~800
>/a/ (male): ~600
>/tv/: ~1000+ (i legit think it could be the biggest on the site)
>/m/: ~80
>/lit/: ~150
>/fit/: ~120
>/pw/: ~150
>loli/b/owl: ~100
>/mu/: ~100
>/jp/: ~120
But this is all pre-hack. One of the interesting things with this years tourneys would be a hard look at how much the hack might've actually effected traffic.
No.205856
Anonymous
>>205849
so really we should define them also as meta defining and non-meta relevant tournaments?
No.205857
Anonymous
/mlp tourneys are weird. They're these events that are as old as /v/'s and seem to be decently active and well run but pretty much exist in their own completely isolated context with no relevance at all here. I keep forgetting about them then someone brings them up and I think "oh yeah, those happen."
No.205858
Anonymous
>>205857
Doesn't help that they're near impossible to talk about outside /mlp/ thanks to GR15.
No.205859
Anonymous
>>205857
When do those even happen anyway?
No.205864
Anonymous
>>205851
which is?
No.205865
Anonymous
>>205852
The doomerism about /a/ and /tv/ is so stupid because literally all that needs to happen is one guy manning up and making a nominations thread. Queen of /a/ was an absolute dumpster fire, like genuinely the worst tournament ever hosted thus far, but it was genuinely good for the single day that the host didn't sperg out. People were generally happy, threads were fast and even some OC got made. It was a little rough but absolutely could've ended great with better management.
We just need one man, A HERO, to rise to the occasion... but who? Whom will dawn the armor and be our shining knight?
No.205866
Anonymous
Image:175679131362.png(917kB, 736x964)CHADly.png
>>205865
BerCHAD the CHADly
No.205867
Anonymous
>>205866
The heroes of heroes.
No.205868
Anonymous
>>205866
My knees.... They are kneeling on their own!
No.205869
Anonymous
Replies:>>205883
>>205865
Why don't YOU do it anon? You know a host kit exists? Is it laziness? lack of motivation, confidence, and/or time? Therein lies the problem. Everyone talks about starting new tourneys but no one wants to run them. It's telling that the Queen of /a/ guy was also an apparent retard newfag, probably underage too. It seems to take that kind of brazen naivety to just storm in, create and try to run a new major tourney out of the blue.
No.205883
Anonymous
>>205869
Plus there's the one thing that's been discussed over and over again; there has to be genuine desire from the home boards and so far there hasn't been much of that. A lot of the times, it just as across as people wanting to push tourneys on other boards regardless of what the inhabitants think.
No.205905
Anonymous
Image:175684270120.jpg(82kB, 421x500)1603748485262.jpg
>>205695
Only including tourneys with more than one winner.

>Ms.
Jenny
>Mr.
Johnny
>Queen
Curly
>King
Dante
>/trash/ or Playgirl or /aco/ or whatever the fuck we're calling it idk
Tyr'ahnee
>/an/lympics
Crow
>/his/
Napoleon
>Tag Team
Rogard and Mansley (honestly a three way tie between this, Freelance, and Mystery, but I like Iron Giant a tad more)
>Co-op
Little Mac and Doc Louis
>/cov/
Ryu and Cyclops
>Shitpost Showdown
Sam

Why yes, I do think we should be able to talk about /tnt/ tournaments in the /tnt/ general thread. I don't know or care enough about MLP to rank their winners.
No.205907
Anonymous
>>205697
>Ms.
Jenny
>Mr.
Zorak
>Queen
Midna
>King
Shadow
>Playgirl
Krystal
>Tag-team
Shaggy and Scooby-Doo
>Co-op
Little Mac and Doc Louis
>/cov/
Ryu and Cyclops
No.205908
Anonymous
>>205695
>Ms.
Jenny, follwoed closely by Frankie.
>Mr.
Bravo, followed closely by Spider-man.
>Queen
Samus, followed closely by Midna.
>King
Dante by a decent margin.
No.205910
Anonymous
>>205855
>/tv/ -1000+
Still makes me confused why nobody's started one given /tv/ has next to no moderation, just last week I remember seeing a frogpost OP with no text and the thread was full of off-topic schizo rants and funposting, and despite all that it stayed up for like 16 hours with no deletion or autosage. And /tv/ is filled with these kind of brainless threads all the time, if the jannies allow those there's no way a tournament where people actually talk about television shows and movie would be a problem.
No.205911
Anonymous
Replies:>>205921
>>205910
Someone apparently went to contact the mods but there's been no word since.
No.205915
Anonymous
>>205695
>Queen
If I put personal bias aside, then Midna. Otherwise, Samus.
>King
Dante
>Co-Op
Banjo & Kazooie
>/cov/
Dreams Never Die
I never participated in the /co/ tournaments, so I don't know if I could really give an opinion on who the best winners are, so I'll just say that I like Jenny and Bravo the most.
>>205910
I believe it was during Queen 2022 that someone tried to start a Queen /tv/ tournament out of the blue, but it got saged.
No.205920
Anonymous
Image:175685388404.jpg(26kB, 400x400)NIGGER.jpg
>this faggot screencaps a King/Queen /v/ OP
>it gets millions of views and an enormous flood of votes
Your reaction?
No.205921
Anonymous
Replies:>>205926
>>205911
Do we need to? Like anon said the moderation on that board seems lax enough that they wouldn’t give a shit if we ran a tourney unannounced.
No.205922
Anonymous
>>205920
If that happens I never want to hear people say xitter is less cancerous than reddit again
Both are absolute cancer but xitter is way more invasive to 4chan in general, just look at how many retarded twitter screencaps from blatant tourists flood every single board.
No.205923
Anonymous
>>205922
How are so many screenshot threads even allowed? A lot of the time they barely have anything to do with the board topic.
No.205924
Anonymous
Replies:>>205943
>>205920
Most seem to assume an outside flood would come from something related to /v/ tourneys. But the biggest leaks to date were /co/ related (ten reddit thousand views for that wedding OC and the facebook crossover).
No.205925
Anonymous
Image:175685768179.jpg(30kB, 540x492)shrek is not okay.jpg
>>205922
>threads with twitter screencaps of 4chan screencaps in the OP
No.205926
Anonymous
>>205921
Better to be on the safe side and to ask because A. it doesn't look like a tournament is being forced on the board and B. insurance in case a janny decides to suddenly janny.
No.205943
Anonymous
>>205924
Nope. The biggest tournament leak was Ashleynigger posting tournament thread OPs directly on twitter. A piece of tournament art for Madotsuki got something like a quarter of a million views. Xitter is still the worst of the worst.
No.205946
Anonymous
Replies:>>205947
>>205943
Riiight. Funny how that pretty much got memoryholed. I remember everyone having a meltdown and calling it the end of tourneys then everyone completely forgot about it next thread. Asheyfag even posted more OC in the threads later and no one brought it up.
Which honestly is okay since it didn't seem to have any perceptible effect on anything. Xitterfags seemed to not know what the fuck it was. The worst leak is still the facebook thing since it was a direct poll link that increased turnout 100+% and got a hated character to win and arguably ruined ms. /co/ for years.
No.205947
Anonymous
Replies:>>205949
>>205946
It's still more ammuniton for why lolifags are shit
No.205949
Anonymous
>>205947
We know you're obsessed and want any reason to bring them up.
No.205952
Anonymous
Image:175687447231.png(218kB, 1043x510)1533870087763.png
>>205949
Nah it's just common knowledge. Piratebro btw.
No.205953
Anonymous
Replies:>>205987
>>205949
You're right, I should stop. Apologies.
No.205955
Anonymous
>>205943
Biggest you say, it was a complete nothing burger you autist.
No.205957
Anonymous
Image:175687544537.png(667kB, 607x892)Queenv24_oc_627.png
Xitterfaggotry aside Ashleyfag's one of my favorite tourney drawfags. Really liked his style.
No.205958
Anonymous
Image:175687645026.png(454kB, 586x378)COMPLETEMONSTERkuTHEEVILEST.png
>Ashleyfag died riding his bike in the terrible car accident perpetrated by Son Goku who was aiming for Bejita who still died anyways.
No.205959
Anonymous
>>205958
why would goku do that
No.205962
Anonymous
>Ashleyfag
>Hat Kid anon
>Hexfag
>aerd
>that one Rollfag
>almost all of /v/'s most remarkable and prolific drawfags are lolifags /tnt/ hates
No.205963
Anonymous
Replies:>>205964
>>205958
Why is this crap so funny?
No.205964
Anonymous
>>205963
You're autistic.
No.205966
Anonymous
>implying autism isn't the fuel for all of these tourneys
No.205967
Anonymous
Replies:>>205988
Image:175688167595.png(1.09MB, 1284x965)1740177493577585.png
>>205962
Hate? No darling, I love every single one of them to death
No.205968
Anonymous
COMPLETEMONSTERku....
No.205969
Anonymous
Replies:>>205974
>>205943
> posting tournament thread OPs directly on twitter
He didn't post the OP. He posted his art, which was then used for the OP.
Also if you looked at NiggerRock's king /v/ plane post everyone was completely oblivious to the tournament part and just going haha funny pilot.
No.205973
Anonymous
>>205943
The only thing that would kill them (that is not mods ending them or the site dying) is if some YouTuber made a video directly about tournaments
No.205974
Anonymous
>>205969
Someone should educate them.
No.205977
Anonymous
>>205958
>that indentation in Bejita where the car ran him over
Keeeeeeeeeek
No.205987
Anonymous
Replies:>>205988
>>205953
Please continue.
No.205988
Anonymous
>>205987
I'm afraid Goku killed them all
>>205967
No.206000
Anonymous
Replies:>>206057
>>205962
/tnt/ is faggity circlejerk that never represented source board opinions.
No.206001
Anonymous
Gotta be honest I don't see as much motivation in myself about the tournaments. It could be related to some things but I say it's mostly because of that stupid 10 posts limit rule that 4chan established.
No.206011
Anonymous
>>206001
Wasn't it less than ten now?
No.206014
Anonymous
Replies:>>206016
>>206001
It wasn’t that bad last year, everyone got their nominations in despite the rule
No.206016
Anonymous
>>206014
We were setting nominations records despite the rule. Kind of bullshit tbh. Likely goes to show how samefagged it is.
No.206017
Anonymous
>>206001
>10 posts limit rule
What??
No.206021
Anonymous
>>205920
Well I mean he did posted a King OC once with no context whatsoever. Its more likely than you'd think.
No.206057
Anonymous
Replies:>>206060
>>206000
The tournaments themselves are faggoty circlejerks that slowly lose ties to its source boards.
No.206060
Anonymous
Replies:>>206064
>>206057
It's literally just a beauty contest powered by Google forms. Faggots like for example the cuckfag from /co/ don't even bother participating in the tournament they just want a reaction for the sake of that free (You).
No.206062
Anonymous
>>206001
That doesn't matter much outside of nominations.
No.206064
Anonymous
>>206060
>It's literally just a beauty contest
It's more like a favorite character contest. How would you explain the male tourneys?
No.206103
Anonymous
>>206064
Shadow is pretty hot, seems more like a beauty contest winner to me.
No.206132
Anonymous
Replies:>>206134
>>206064
Straight male demographic.
No.206134
Anonymous
Replies:>>206149
>>206132
Nothing straight about what goes on in either male tourney. Or even some of the female tourneys if I'm being honest.
No.206149
Anonymous
>>206134
That's just a loud minority.
No.206225
Anonymous
Replies:>>206262
>>206219
I checked every winner from both boards. The only one's to win and not be nominated the first thread are:
>Kronk (thread 2)
>Betty (thread 2)
>Reimu (thread 2)
>Recette (thread 7)
Once again Recette's a huge outlier. Every other winner seemed to get nominated pretty quickly. So your likely winner is someone nominated in the first twenty or so minutes.
No.206262
Anonymous
>>206225
Kleinerfag always does manage to nominate one of his picks in the first five minutes...
No.206263
Anonymous
Replies:>>206272
>>206262
To be fair so do all of you
I guarantee that everyone but pure funposters who don’t care for tournaments who see this post will be refreshing the board tomorrow waiting for the first thread and nominate a pick within 2 minutes
No.206264
Anonymous
>>206262
And they're all either literally whos or meme picks.
No.206272
Anonymous
Replies:>>206301
>>206263
>>206264
Now I'm wondering who the first character nominated in every tournament was. And I'm talking about every year.
No.206297
Anonymous
Replies:>>206302
>>206064
My dude a good bunch of people voting for Zorak just did so because they wanted to fuck him
No.206299
Anonymous
>>206264
That doesn't narrow it down.
No.206301
Anonymous
>>206272
Archives exist.
No.206302
Anonymous
>>206297
Just take the L on the retarded take instead of throwing out more of them.
No.206320
Anonymous
Image:175705118937.jpg(135kB, 581x965)1522564895605.jpg
Gentlemen, the very first character nominated in the history of the (modern) tournaments and it was by OP himself
>https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/102838846/#102838860
Come back to me tomorrow or the day after and I'll compile a list for every tournament.
No.206323
Anonymous
Image:175705159027.png(744kB, 887x720)cordiecliffside.png
>>206320
>Cordie was the 4th nominated
Reminder that Vickers shit (and Droneshit by association) was there from the very start.
No.206373
Anonymous
>>206320
>3rd is Death from Sandman
sad falloff, that one.
No.206375
Anonymous
Replies:>>206376
I think the nom system is kind of broken ATM, the (you) system filters out laggers and very very obscure characters. The number of yous scales pretty well with the number of nominations so it doesn't really alleviate anything.
No.206376
Anonymous
Replies:>>206377
>>206375
however inadvertedly it does help the threads archive faster so people can nom even more people. Although if the goal is to have fewer nominations, paradoxically it would be better to let everyone nominated with an image in and have the thread die out slower. But this would be asinine
No.206377
Anonymous
>>206376
On the other hand there are redundant nominations quite often so perhaps there'd be more room for nominating new characters faster in each thread
No.206378
Anonymous
>>206373
It's the duality of being a cult favorite waifu.
No.206386
Anonymous
>>206373
She would've fallen off regardless, but it still has more to do with cartoonfags finding tournaments and drowning out comicfags past the first year because comics are a niche hobby. Even though /co/ owes its existence to comics, since it was created because people kept posting comic book pages on /b/.
No.206388
Anonymous
Replies:>>206389
Alright, here's a list of the nominee from every /co/ tournament. In 4 hours this will be outdated.
>>Ms. /co/
>2018 - Jinx (Teen Titans 2003)
________by none other than OP
________the first not by OP was Carol Danvers
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/102838846/#102838860
>2019 - Erma (Erma)
________Spinel was 2nd
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/109988270/#109988284
>2020 - old Toph (Avatar)
________failed to get enough (you)s
________young Toph was (successfully )nominated immediately afterwards
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/117598849/#117598861
>2021 - Shego (Kim Possible)
________didn't get enough (you)s since the thread got trashed
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/125650216/#125650223
>2022 - Charlie Morningstar (Hazbin Hotel)
________Fang was nominated 2nd
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/132730963/#132730969
>2023 - Fionna the Human (Adventure Time)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/139162543/#139162551
>2024 - Tiff Crust (My Life as a Teenage Robot)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/145410341/#145410349

>>Mr. /co/
>2018 - /co/'s favorite
________it's Killer Moth, but the poster neglected to use his name
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/103334973/#103335004
>2019 - SkekTek the Scientist (The Dark Crystal)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/110486162/#110486179
>2020 - Alastor (Hazbin Hotel)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/118537544/#118537552
>2021 - Rorschach (Watchmen)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/126221190/#126221201
>2022 - fpbp
________actually it was Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)
________the 1st nomination was the 2nd post
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/133388193/#133388200
>2023 - Mac (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/139836152/#139836158
>2024 - Killer Bean (Killer Bean)
________https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/145872414/#145872419
No.206389
Anonymous
>>206388
the *first nominee from every /co/ tournament
Thought I should clarify. Anyways, here's /v/:
>>Queen of /v/
>2019 - Maya Fey
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/477719848/#477720038
>2020 - Coco Bandicoot (Crash Bandicoot)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/531674576/#531674694
>2021 - Buddy (Lisa the Painful)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/577154497#577154563
>2022 - Rathian (Monster Hunter)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/617872778#617872819
>2023 - Dinah (Summon Night: Swordcraft Story 2)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/656295387/#656295408
>2024 - Dinah (Summon Night: Swordcraft Story 2)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/694076708#694076721
________looks like somebody's dedicated to their waifu

>>King of /v/
>2019 - He's in
________and by "he" anon means Phoenix Wright
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/478933036#478933291
>2020 - Manager/Ayin (Lobotomy Corporation)
________forma de buff
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/536246643/#536246691
>2021 - Sunny (Omori)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/579575158#579575214
>2022 - Jetstream Sam (Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/620648163/#620648192
>2023 - Dr. Isaac Kleiner (Half-Life)
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/659242248#659242281
>2024 - Luigi (Super Mario Bros.)
________funnily enough, two posts later Luigi was nominated again with the same gif
________https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/696524528#696524550
No.206390
Anonymous
Replies:>>206407
>>206386
That's more on the staff deciding to combine the two mediums.
No.206395
Anonymous
>>206389
>Jetstream Sam is the very firsf nomination
>A year later, everybody forgets and he causes mayhem
Now that was funny
No.206404
Anonymous
>>206389
>Dr. Isaac Kleiner
Kek, he fell off.
No.206407
Anonymous
>>206386
>>206390
Can't even split them up now since it would create another /pw/ scenario where one board thrives more after splitting off.
No.206750
Anonymous
GUYS WHY IS LITTLE AUDREY AND THE JETSONS ARE MISSING CAN YOU ADD THEM ALL OF THEM GOT TO 9 REPLIES


Also Hailey Flower and Jojo Violet are still missing please update it NOW


And also Little Suzy too, where is she?

Fucking god there is alot of missing characters, both krisztas are missing too. Where are they?
No.206895
Anonymous
Replies:>>206896
uhh where did the ms. /co/ thread here go?
No.206896
Anonymous
>>206895
/tnt/ mods banned ms /co/
No.207352
Anonymous
Good news: the whole tourney environment might get a new resurgence of hype and fun like after NSA was outed
Bad news: since this happened mid-season, this will likely take up a ton of discussion for the next few months and detract from the actual tournaments
No.207899
Anonymous
Image:175797526696.png(866kB, 1300x1300)IMG_8701.png
Posting the last Ms. /co/ 2025 tilemap update here in case there's no more new threads.
No.207900
Anonymous
Replies:>>207935
Image:175797600044.png(868kB, 1300x1300)IMG_8703.png
>>207899
(Probably) final update.
No.207901
El Barto
Replies:>>207903
i was gonna put this (>>207897) into 4chan's ms /co/ thread but my IP got banned souhh ye

(hopefully this pic still ends up on 4tourneys)
No.207903
Anonymous
Replies:>>207906
>>207901
What did tranjan b& you over? Just reset your roiter and delete your cookies. In the meantime, I can post it for you if you want.
No.207906
El Barto
>>207903
ithink someone else broke a rule an' i was on the same IP as them so i ended up banned aswell
No.207934
Anonymous
Replies:>>208239
>>205694
Which character do you think had the longest gap between appearances?
No.207935
Anonymous
Image:175799413870.png(745kB, 1300x1300)1757989941870.png
>>207899
>>207900
Something else was added while you slept.
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/150402223/#150405448
No.207968
Anonymous
And just to remind you folks, Mr /co/lympus begins on October 10th
No.208135
Anonymous
>>207522
TARDjita...
No.208137
Anonymous
Another one
No.208155
Anonymous
Who is the least underdog winner ever?
No.208156
Anonymous
>>208155
Samus, Armstrong,Dante,Reimu
No.208167
Anonymous
Replies:>>208238
>>208155
>top seed
>huge fotm factor
>widely known and liked by the board (at the time) to the point meta and spite factors wouldn't matter anyways
>everyone knows they're going to win from the beginning
>crushes other classic competition
Spinel, Fang, and Garland.
No.208238
Anonymous
Replies:>>208341
>>208155
>>208167
Yeah, I'd agree on Garland. His win felt almost like a canon event for King of /v/. Don't mind it myself since I like the character and thought his main supporters did a good job propping him up outside just memes. It was just very obvious he was going to take that year. I feel Spinel would be a similar case if she wasn't marred by the Peru shit.
No.208239
Anonymous
>>207934
Cassandra Cain first qualified in 2018, the first tournament, with her second qualification being this year

This beats out the three-way tie for second between Megatron, Judge Dredd, and Principal Skinner in Mr. /co/, with their qualifications being in 2018 and 2024
No.208339
Anonymous
Replies:>>208349
when will /his/ starts?
No.208341
Anonymous
Image:175861111994.png(63kB, 602x480)Final-Fantasy-Garland-Fight.png
>>208238
At least with Garland you can justify him not being a new character since he's supposed to be the same Garland from the first Final Fantasy game before he became the armored enemy he is today. Hell, he's technically the oldest King of /v/ winner born in 1987 with the others that come close being Shadow and Dante who were born in the same year of 2001.
No.208349
ANEgroid !!/Uw+IBaMwoK
Replies:>>208350
>>208339
Realistically next week on friday
No.208350
ANEgroid !!/Uw+IBaMwoK
>>208349
Seems like my trip code changed. Well you'll know it's me since I still have the same challonge account.
No.208360
Anonymous
Image:175864660524.png(891kB, 1080x823)p01wv4bwvz991.png
>mfw i got banned from 4chan again
I am starting to wonder why anyone would want to go onto 4chan at this point due to the terrible users and the terrible mods who allow blatant rule breaking to be allowed.
>Wanted to talk about PlayStation All-Stars but the only reply i got was the usual /v/ pessimism mixed with fetish gooner posting
>Was about to have good conversation on /coc/ but got banned before i could reply
>/coc/ and /co/'s creativity in general is far from what it used to be
>Got banned for "falsely reporting" a /vg/ thread despite it clearly having a NSFW image on a blue board
>I don't even think /vg/ is for video games anymore, just posting NSFW images
Perhaps i should take this as a sign from God that i should take a break from 4chan or that he doesn't want me on that site altogether.
I don't expect 4chan to be around for much longer anyway as through The Holy Spirit inside of me i know that the site will face God's Righteous Judgement for the wickedness, even more so the jannies and the mods who stay complacent in all of it, the dirty laundry of the mods will be exposed.
The Sharty hack and so many people leaving the site because of it was just a Divine warning that went ignored.
May God forgive and have mercy on them.
No.208362
Anonymous
Replies:>>208376
>>208360
What a delusional faggot you are. You deserve the ban. Why are you blogging in /tnt/ of all places? You should get banned here too.
No.208363
Anonymous
Replies:>>208369
>>208360
It's disheartening to be sure of it seeing the jannies allow so much detestable coomerslop that doesn't even try to be SFW on the blue boards, while at the same time deleting people actually discussing the board topic for no reason. If 4chan is going to have these disgusting, despicable ass porn boards could they at least do us the liberty of keeping the garbage that's supposed to be contained on those boards in those boards?
No.208366
Anonymous
>>208360
Numnuts...
No.208368
Anonymous
Replies:>>208370
>>208360
Yoel I think you should take that sign from God and fuck off here too retard.
No.208369
Anonymous
>>208363
I know right? And they ban those who actually want something done about it. The mods are too busy on their Discord server to do their jobs properly yet they only ban when it's someone they personally disagree with or when it's people reporting because getting reports cuts into their personal time, why do the job they don't want to do when they can just ban everyone who wants them to do their jobs.
The mods and jannies of that site are only in it for their own benefit and i wouldn't be surprised if all the off topic goon posting is nothing but mods and jannies.
Last time i tried to appeal a ban of mine the mod who looked over my appeal faulted me for trying to appeal my ban to him when he was unavailable for a few days, yet he was the one who reached out to me and didn't tell me that while he we were discussing my appeal, and he even got defensive and mad when i told him that if he was too busy then he should not have offered to look handle my appeal.
No.208370
Anonymous
Image:175864980148.png(399kB, 859x452)166481434598.png
>>208368
Forgot my image.
No.208373
Anonymous
Replies:>>208374
I have no problem with coomer content. 4chan has always been porn brained and I don’t get to why it makes some people so irate. The twatter screencaps and political junk has got to go though.
No.208374
Anonymous
>>208373
Two things.
For starters just because something was always bad doesn't make it any less bad, that just means a fix is a long time coming.
Secondly was 4chan really always such a gooner site? I admit i wasn't on 4chan in the olden days of the site but from what i have seen 4chan was more about memes and communities getting together making fun screencaps, telling stories, actually discussing what they love, making memes, etc, but now the NSFW posting has gotten out of hand, seriously, when was the last time 4chan has made a good wholesome meme or had a screencap that was just good hearted SFW fun?
It's not just NSFW posting but also the toxic behavior with far more people going into threads about subjects they hate to let their hatred be known instead of going into threads about stuff they actually like.
And it's only gotten worse, i haven't participated in this year's Ms. /co/, didn't even enter a single thread for it, but while looking at the catalog i noticed that the OP images being used have become far more NSFW than they were last year and the years before. I assume this may be because of how many people left 4chan due to the Sharty hack, including OC makers, and the people who stuck around being the toxic users who always start fights and the gooners so the tournament managers pretty much had so little options on OC to choose for their OP. Like i said this is just an assumption so could anyone who was in those threads tell me if my assumption is correct? How many people voted and ere in the threads compared to the previous years? What was the overall experience and posting like compared to previous years?
Now that i think about the Sharty hack causing OC makers to leave could also explain why /coc/ is more dead than it was before the Sharty hack.
No.208376
Anonymous
Replies:>>208395
>>208362
ngl /tnt/ feels like an asylum with anons casually posting stuff that’s better off private the more they get comfortable posting here.
Frankly I want to talk about tourney shit in the tourney thread.
No.208378
Anonymous
>>208374
>was 4chan really always such a gooner site?
Yes. It sounds like your problem isn’t with nsfw anyways but ass and titties in swimsuits kind of pics. If you’re that neurotically angry about some lewd pictures in the catalog then probably you’re better off leaving.
No.208379
Anonymous
Replies:>>208380
>>208378
What you described is NSFW, it's just not outright pornography. There's a difference but both are NSFW.
No.208380
Anonymous
>>208379
Not really but it doesn’t matter, you’re a gigafag.
No.208381
Anonymous
>>208374
I mean, people came up with rule 34 for a reason. Not to mention old 4chan boasts such wholesome memes as "your resistance is only making my penis harder" or "a cat is fine too".

But back then, it was mostly a cool edgy counter-culture thing. Porn naturally existed in huge quantities, but it didn't cross over with memes that much. People posting "a cat is fine" too most likely didn't jerk off to bestiality, but people posting "damn brat needs correction" nowadays most likely do jerk off to lolis. Porn on the internet has become a normie commodity, the half of twitter that isn't inane arguing is soulless trend-chasing porn artists. It grew from a niche subculture into something a ton of people online are constantly consuming, and turns out even something as low-brow as porn can get more low-brow when normies get into it. The internet is somehow both more horny and more puritannical than before simultaneously, though on 4chan the horny part is obviously more visible.

That said, a lot of "NSFW" pics you saw were probably from the swimsuit round, which is an early tournament tradition from years ago, giving artists incentive to draw cheesecake of their favorite girls is one of its purposes.
No.208384
Anonymous
Replies:>>208386
>Cumnuts samefagging about shit he doesn’t know
No.208386
Anonymous
>>208384
Now we wait for him to ask for Silveranon's email for "non-tourney related reasons".
No.208387
Anonymous
Replies:>>208399
>>208380
He's probably one of the SF fags.
No.208390
Anonymous
Why the fuck would you be so invested in 4chan as a devout Christian. It’s always been a godless den of degeneracy.
No.208394
Anonymous
>>208390
Ask Pencil Anon; he seems fine with it while also being devout.
No.208395
Anonymous
>>208376
This isn't your hugbox. We can talk about whatever we like.
No.208396
Anonymous
>>208378
>>208380
So true furry bro.
No.208397
Anonymous
>>208390
Iit's become hip and cool to pretend to be Christian on 4chan as a contrarian thing, so maybe if you're autistic you could get fooled by that.
No.208398
Anonymous
Replies:>>208400
>>208395
>We can talk about whatever we like.
Does whining about being banned from 4chan because you don't like lewd images contribute to tourney discussion whatsoever? No? Then I don't give a shit about your off-topic blog post.
No.208399
Anonymous
Replies:>>208401
>>208381
The rules of the internet were made to be a joke never to be taken seriously yet sadly it has causes people to obey, if not outright worship, one of the "rules"to justify their own wicked behavior.
And the two examples you posted really are just exceptions, not the rules, and those two memes died for a reason, that reason being sex and pornography just isn't funny, meanwhile we have lots of good, not NSFW, memes from the past such as Rageface, Trollface, Rick Roll and even Pepe started out wholesome and honestly has become more wholesome in recent times so good on them for making Pepe wholesome again.Even the tournaments were more wholesome than what they have become.

I completely agree with you on your second paragraph.

If what i have seen was swimsuit round then perhaps the swimsuit round should be replaced with something else, not to mention that the image mages in the OPs i have seen were more fetish suits than swimsuits.
I guess this means that somehow something already made to be gooner posting like the swimsuit round has also become for more low-brow than it was before, like what you mentioned with the subculture stuff.
>>208387
Who?
>>208390
Same reason why Jesus and his disciples hanged around the sinners and outcasts.
Psalm 1:1 Blessed is the one who does not walk in step with the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers.
Although it is good to take breaks from such company as the apostle Paul warns about.
1 Corinthians 15:33 Bad company corrupts good character.
Good reason for everyone to take a break from 4chan honestly.
No.208400
Anonymous
>>208398
That's not me, turns out someone else disagrees and uses this board to talk about stuff unrelated to tourneys.
No.208401
Anonymous
Replies:>>208608
>>208399
Swimsuit round is swimsuit round. It's an old tradition that everyone wanted back, because it's a waifu contest and it's natural to appreciate their appearance as part of it. NSA only ignored it during her years because of laziness/prudishness. It's not what I was referring as the soulless low-brow stuff. That would be something like the Elf comic slop that Hexfag latched onto, stuff that only exists to inspire porn.
No.208402
Anonymous
You guys realize you are arguing with Numnuts, right?
No.208403
Anonymous
>>208381
Porn and sex were not an ironic niche subculture, retard. People were absolutely always gooners.
>posting "damn brat needs correction" nowadays most likely do jerk off to lolis.
This here's a great instance of exposing yourself. Lolifag degeneracy has always been a staple of 4chan. It was founded by weeb wankers and there was board in the early days devoted to it. If anything there's way more prudishness about it now since it's a huge no-no for the normiebase.
No.208404
Anonymous
>>208402
I thought it was Numnuts arguing with himself,
No.208405
Anonymous
>>208403
Akshually it became a no no after moot disavowed it in the early 2010s. Or was it 2009?
No.208406
Anonymous
Replies:>>208415
>>208405
moot saying something years later after he became a public adult figure and his site went mainstream doesn't mean much.
No.208407
Anonymous
Replies:>>208415
Let's be honest. The problem is with straight sexy wimminz. If it was furry cock and balls numnuts would probably join in by posting more of his asshole.
No.208408
Anonymous
Replies:>>208409
>>208403
You're missing the forest for the trees. The point of that example is that people jerked off to whatever, but they usually didn't make memes about their fap material (unless it was something funny in its own right) because that kind of culture didn't form yet. "Damn brat" becoming a meme on 4chan is in the same vein as "step on me" becoming a meme on twitter, people online getting more comfortable with making their fetishes and the porn they consume part of their identity and self-expression.
No.208409
Anonymous
>>208408
Seems your issue is more with certain cultural rot then than the actual sex content
No.208414
Anonymous
>look at catalog
>only about 15 out of 150 threads are coom OP's
My virgin eyes can't handle the cooch bro's, 4chan must die...
No.208415
Anonymous
Replies:>>208418
>>208406
Reading the original post, he seemed more annoyed than anything. Wonder what ate him.
>>208407
That's all of tnt.
No.208417
Anonymous
>>208402
I just find it funny one guy is all it took to derail tourney talk.
This board will talk about anything besides the actual tournaments.
No.208418
Anonymous
>>208415
>Wonder what ate him.
Probably his crazy hobby site getting so mainstream and him needing to dial back, maybe for legit legal fears. And just getting older, maybe starting to become a family man. Changes a lot.
No.208426
Anonymous
I can't believe this conversation is still going. I can't believe this is not samefaging. I can't believe this isn't a false flag. I can't believe someone would get so offended about literal drawings they come to blog to /tnt/ of all places, like it'd do anything. Go back to Recettera.
No.208427
Anonymous
>>208426
>I can't believe this is not samefaging.
Anon I…
No.208429
Anonymous
>>208426
/co/ is all about getting offended over drawings. This is why bad comics get the most traction.
No.208450
Anonymous
Replies:>>208468
>>208395
>This isn’t your hugbox so we can talk about blatantly off topic shit
Why are retards like this all over 4chan now?
No.208468
Anonymous
>>208450
It's the new retard meta.
Patch when, devs? Ragebaiting was at least funny some times when it was really obvious.
No.208606
Anonymous
>>208426
>offended
No, i'm just doing God's duty for me. I must never give up. 4chan got God's warning once, and the way God works, each warning becomes more and more of a slap across the face until people either see his truth or get their kingdoms destroyed, the kingdom in this case being 4chan.
No.208608
Anonymous
>>208401
>waifu
Ah yes, "waifus", a modern form of idolatry, same with "husbondos".
Those who actually delve into such a thing are hurting themselves and their potential, especially in terms of family.
Just look at how much "waifu" culture has gotten a tight grip over Japan for the past few decade then look at the nation's birth rate.
In fact look at the worldwide birth rate after Japan's "waifu" culture became worldwide. It's a curse.
But with that being said i will agree that the Hex stuff is far worse. May God have mercy on the poor soul behind the Hex posting.
No.208609
Anonymous
Replies:>>208614
>>208405
I wonder how moot feels about what he has created.
No.209072
Anonymous
Replies:>>209087
>/co/ thread and tournament are filled with schizos
>/v/ thread has gone defcon 5 in arguments
These are hard days for /tnt/.
No.209087
Anonymous
>>209072
>/v/ thread has gone defcon 5 in arguments
What's going on?
No.209169
Anonymous
>>209087
Seething about /co/ for the past few hours.
No.209170
Anonymous
Replies:>>209181
>>209169
Seriously? Why?
No.209176
Anonymous
>>209087
>>209169
That and the same arguments about King that this board has been having all year but with even more retardation.
No.209181
Anonymous
>>209170
Their pet artist got exposed on /co/ and they took great offense to that, even citing racism.
No.209182
Anonymous
Replies:>>209188
>>209176
There was so much retardation that the thread managed to reach 400 posts in THREE days.
No.209188
Anonymous
Replies:>>209243
>>209182
I wonder if Black Hand gets any revenure from that sweet sweet PPH.
No.209189
Anonymous
>>209176
What's the argument?
>>209181
Really? People from /v/ are making accusations of racism? This is a rabbit hole i am now even more interested in. Where can i learn more?
No.209219
Anonymous
The hack was the best thing to happen to the site in years, and this year's Ms. is proof. Initially, I believed the hack would drive people away, but Ms. just reached the 1K vote mark on R1, a guarantee in /v/alllhalla but a rarity here. Rigging? Don't think the worst. PUBLICITY. The hack actually spread across the internet, and reignited interest in the site. And when newcomers saw the concept of voting on their favorite characters in a fighting tournament in the guise of a poll, they flocked to it. People did leave, I'm sure. But people CAME too. Dontsaythatswhatshesaid
No.209221
Anonymous
>>209219
I think it might've killed off more interest in tournaments than you think.
No.209225
Anonymous
>>209219
That's why I think Raven ended up barely surviving against Ragatha. A lot of newcomers without exposure to TourneyMeta were just backing their favorite girls without being as responsive to prior year bias or campaigning, and it offset the people who didn't want another FARTS winner
No.209228
Anonymous
Ok so going forward we need to explain rules and ideas really really fucking clearly because 60% of the thread is people shocked we aren't doing Round Robin, most of them having apparently never heard that word or having completely missed the prior discussion on it.
No.209233
Anonymous
>>209181
>Their pet artist got exposed on /co/ and they took great offense to that
You left out the part where he wanted to send him an IP logger through his email and look through data breaches.
No.209234
Anonymous
Replies:>>209235
so are we switching to round robin
No.209235
Anonymous
>>209234
>are we gonna change format from the voted option in the middle of the tourney cause of samefag
No, shutup fag.
No.209236
Anonymous
Replies:>>209262
No.209243
Black Hand ## Developer
>>209188
I wish.
No.209262
Anonymous
>>209233
>>209236
That was a /v/ fag avatar fagging with a Simpsons character and long after the initial exposure. /co/ does not care for this person no matter how much people push him, yet there's this narrative that this board is out for Peruvian blood.
No.209280
Anonymous
Image:175907836382.png(52kB, 500x250)teddie_p4.PNG
>ms. /co/ finally had a relatively smooth sailing this year with a beloved winner taking it
>decide to go through with an all star tourney
>both /tnt/ and /co/ have had one shit storm after another since all star started
Maybe we should have quit while we're ahead.
No.209281
Anonymous
>>209280
I told you it would be a bad idea!
No.209282
Anonymous
Replies:>>209284
>>209280
What have the shit storms been other than what's gone on here?
No.209284
Anonymous
Replies:>>209289
>>209282
Every single meta complaint built up from ms. burst upon, especially concerning Fang. That and off site drama has completely spilled over.
No.209287
Anonymous
Replies:>>209289
This basically turned into an average /co/ stealth thread now.
No.209289
Anonymous
>>209284
>>209287
It feels like a /cov/ situation. Like, the tourney itself is fine, and the results will probably be fine, but the threads got overrun with any excuse meta drama possible.
No.209290
Anonymous
>Told everyone it would be a horrible idea to do All Stars as it would just be a drama shitfest and we should just let things go on
Glad to see I'm vindicated.
No.209291
Anonymous
>>209290
Nah, I still wanna see how the tourney itself plays out.
No.209292
Anonymous
Replies:>>209294
>>209290
What's happening? I'm ignoring it and you got me interested but not enough to actually go into the threads myself.
No.209293
Anonymous
Replies:>>209321
>>209219
From what i heard the hack drove people away.
Did it just drive away the bad people and brought in good people?
No.209294
Anonymous
>>209292
The normal meta arguments you would expect.
It's really not that bad though, outside of the Hexfag drama here getting discussed there.
No.209304
Anonymous
Replies:>>209312
I legitimately struggle to understand how people get so legitimately angry about 4chan tournaments that they cry at every opportunity for literal years (3-6 depending on who they hate). Fang haters just got their way and they’re still going on and on about how non waifus need to be banned and shit and this tournament is proof.

They’re funpost tournaments and I doubt the majority of the total vote count is even legitimate. What is the need to get so upset about it?
No.209305
Anonymous
I think Betty getting so many cartoon showcases on the streams and her thread activity nudged her just over Monarch who otherwise has historically been considered better
No.209307
Anonymous
>>209305
There are two things you have to consider:
>much lower turnout this tourney
>the voting demographics change every year
The people voting in this are a subset of this year’s voters. Of course results are going to be different than what you might expect.
No.209308
Anonymous
>>209305
Monarch had no pity boost too.
No.209309
Anonymous
>>209305
Monarch is a victim of bad timing, there's an anti-campaign swing rn. She was still considered the second best winner as recently as the 2024 Afterparty
No.209312
Anonymous
Replies:>>209322
>>209304
So who's winning? I imagine Spinel is already out?
No.209313
Anonymous
Replies:>>209314
>anti-Fangfag won, she flopped and is proven an fotm meme hype boosted winner
>STILL seethes, copes, pisses, malds
autism has been upgraded to actual derangement.
No.209314
Anonymous
>>209313
He will continue to seethe for many years to come
No.209315
Anonymous
As an anti-Fang guy myself, i believe that she was rigged by NSA, but even i admit that others go too far with the hate. I hope they find peace away from such anger.
No.209316
Anonymous
It’s weird to say this on /tnt/ but I couldn’t imagine being fucking mad at a tournament, specially years later.
No.209317
Anonymous
I am tired of hearing about Fang both from her fans and her detractors, unfortunately the detractors are far more vocal about the character they hate than the dinosaur’s actual fans.
No.209319
Anonymous
Seeing Fang get exposed was based.
No.209320
Anonymous
Monarch losing was not particularly surprising. Only slightly favored her odds.
I'm glad for Bettybro's though. Despite the meta circumstances always being a used as a mark against the year she won, she's legit a good winner in herself. I wouldn't mind if she won this tourney now.
No.209321
Anonymous
Replies:>>209322
>>209293
Precisely. News on the hack promoted 4chan, and it also wrung out the shitstormers...mostly. Apparently All-Stars has NOT been going well from what I've reading.
No.209322
Anonymous
>>209312
>>209321
You know you could just make a few clicks and go to the tourney yourself.
No.209323
Anonymous
You know this seethe will just repeat when mr. all stars starts, right?
No.209325
Anonymous
>>209323
Is it too late to have a second vote in Mr. and decide not to do another All-stars?
No.209326
Anonymous
>>209323
Not necessarily. Mr. has always been chiller.
No.209327
Anonymous
>>209326
It already has its own version of anti Fangfag.
No.209328
Anonymous
>>209326
King is around /co/ now and look how they are with ms. They will ensure that all star is as miserable as possible for mr.
No.209330
Anonymous
Replies:>>209358
>anti-fangfag is going to use this to spam primal season 3 threads when that starts
>fang won’t even be in that season
I hate when tourneyshit bleeds into unrelated threads.
No.209331
Anonymous
>>209319
She did batter against Raven than Toph did.
No.209334
Anonymous
>>209331
>She did the batter
That's…quite a mental image.
No.209345
Anonymous
Replies:>>209346
>thread has just devolved into cuck and bbc posting male characters
Hey now, you're an all star…
No.209346
Anonymous
Replies:>>209357
>>209345
What do you mean? This is peak /v/ humor.
No.209357
Anonymous
Replies:>>209360
>>209346
/v/ are a bunch of black obsessed cucks?
No.209358
Anonymous
Replies:>>209365
>>209330
>I hate when tourneyshit bleeds into unrelated threads.
Oh me too. Slay The Princess fans had to deal with that last year.
I am no longer into horror so i won't go into those threads anymore but i still feel bad for them because i know the tournament is going to derail their threads again.
No.209359
Anonymous
>>209319
What happened?
No.209360
Anonymous
Replies:>>209363
>>209357
Mindbroken by /v/.
No.209361
Anonymous
Replies:>>209362
>>209359
Lost against the most recent winner, which in the minds of the deranged means her previous years never happened.
No.209362
Anonymous
>>209361
While i agree that people g too far with the hate i will say that Fang's previous years had, for lack of a better term, unrighteous factors that helped her out and her having such a defeat now is evidence of this, kinda like how Tifa getting completely destroyed in the Elite 8 last year proves how her win against Princess had unrighteous factors.
No.209363
Anonymous
No.209364
Anonymous
Replies:>>209375
>>209362
>anti-fang is also a princessfag
Figures
No.209365
Anonymous
>>209358
>>209359
>>209362
Fuck off, Numnuts.
No.209366
Anonymous
Should /co/ vote little girls to appease /v/? Are they the weird ones?
No.209368
Anonymous
>This character lost to a character several years later, that means everything they’ve ever done is null and void!
I’ve seen this sort of cope crow over the years and it is only going to get worse. You can use this to attack almost any character btw.
No.209369
Anonymous
Replies:>>209370
>>209368
>crow
*grow
No.209370
Anonymous
>>209369
For a minute I thought the narrator was trying to speak to us.
No.209371
Anonymous
Replies:>>209372
>/v/ fag gets called brown
>"Just for that I'm going to campaign Peter to first place!"
Isn't this the kind of empty threats /v/ mocked /co/ for?
No.209372
Anonymous
No.209373
Anonymous
Replies:>>209375
>he's watching the thread and calling people raped for his retardation
Hi /v/ fag! Seethe more.
No.209375
Anonymous
>>209364
Trying to spread your flame war on /tnt/ now?
>>209368
So should we have nothing for respect for the likes of Spinel or any other character that got votes through dishonest means?
>>209373
That's disgusting of him. Why don't people report such behavior?
No.209376
Anonymous
Replies:>>209407
>>209375
Toph lost to Raven by a bigger margin than Fang did, despite previously beating her. Does that mean Toph’s previous wins against Raven are null and void? Just ignore that the demographics of the tourneys have changed a lot over the years and that most of the main voters aren’t even participating in this.
No.209377
Anonymous
Replies:>>209407
>>209375
>trying to spread your flame war
Nigga we know it’s you. The “civil” mask you wear isn’t working. Accusing everyone else of being a troll or “clinically insane” like you do in the main threads doesn’t work here.

My advice that I know you won’t heed? Stop taking these things seriously, they aren’t worth being angry about, especially not over the course of 5 years.
No.209382
Anonymous
Replies:>>209383
Why does Princess attract these weird defenders.
No.209383
Anonymous
>>209382
It's 90% Numnuts.
No.209385
Anonymous
>>209319
Where's the sauce?
No.209402
ANEgroid !!/Uw+IBaMwoK
Replies:>>211301
All right, will run nominations for a day or two depending on how long it takes to fill 64/128 characters, if there's not 64 on the first day it'll only go up to 64 but if there's more than that I will let it run up to 128.
https://itsalmo.st/time-for-emperor-of-his-2025-t4uf
No.209407
Anonymous
Replies:>>209413
>>209376
I never said anything about "null and void", you seem to be the only one using those words. I'm just saying that Fang's wins were covered is suspicion, first by FotM and the other due to NSA's suspicious workings. Honestly to act like nothing about Fang is suspicious is to ignore NSA's terrible polling and rigging.
>>209377
>The “civil” mask you wear isn’t working. Accusing everyone else of being a troll or “clinically insane” like you do in the main threads doesn’t work here.
I haven't even been in the main threads this year. To think everyone you disagree with is the same person is paranoia and i hope you find help for that.
>My advice that I know you won’t heed? Stop taking these things seriously, they aren’t worth being angry about, especially not over the course of 5 years.
I honestly believe you should be telling this advice to yourself.
No.209412
Anonymous
>Fang cope still going strong
This will literally never end and I just want it to. All stars was a horrendous idea.
No.209413
Anonymous
Replies:>>209417
>>209407
>2020 was FoTM
Even if that was a disqualifying thing (it’s not) her show was on break at the time. The new episodes wouldn’t start until weeks later. And a character with massive support and hype coming back after a year absence doing great isn’t this massive stretch, especially given how her show was literally airing at the time unlike 2020.

I accepted she’s a controversial winner, it’s part of why I like her so much, I accepted the fact that the timing helped her a lot. But to go on about “unrighteousness” or whatever in a fucking 4chan tournament is crazy. It’s also crazy to look at a poll years later and come to the conclusion that the previous year (three years ago) was rigged despite the audience of this poll being very different in both size and demographics (we literally talk about the changing tourney demos every single year).
No.209414
Anonymous
>>209412
Maybe blame the fangfags for coping?
No.209415
Anonymous
Replies:>>209416
>>209412
For Fangfags maybe.
No.209416
Anonymous
Replies:>>209417
>>209415
This must be their personal 9/11.
No.209417
Anonymous
>>209413
>Even if that was a disqualifying thing
Whao man, i never said that should be a disqualifying thing wither, i'm just saying that it gave her a dishonest advantage.
>But to go on about “unrighteousness” or whatever in a fucking 4chan tournament is crazy.
I just believe that the tournaments could have more integrity.
>It’s also crazy to look at a poll years later and come to the conclusion that the previous year (three years ago) was rigged despite the audience of this poll being very different in both size and demographics (we literally talk about the changing tourney demos every single year).
Honestly i wouldn't consider it rigged if it wasn't an NSA tournament, i just do not trust her.
>>209416
Didn't Fang win on a 9/11?
No.209418
Anonymous
Kill Numnuts. Behead Numnuts. Roundhouse kick Numnuts into the concrete.
No.209420
Anonymous
Replies:>>209421
Would anyone care if during Mr. /co/ we voted whether or not to replace the trophy design or judge spot or anchor with Frankie for the next 8 years to mark her All Stars win? It should be voted on, but it's not a bad idea
No.209421
Anonymous
Replies:>>209427
>>209420
Why do you have to vote on it? Artists draw what they want. There's nothing stopping drawfags from giving the winners little golden Amitys.
No.209427
Anonymous
>>209421
…Have any artists even stated they want the trophy changed?
No.209439
Anonymous
Some people keep pushing a thread personality tourney.
No.209443
Anonymous
Replies:>>209451
>>209331
Anti loli boost is my choice of explanation
No.209451
Anonymous
>>209443
Sounds kind of like a cope.
No.209453
Anonymous
>>209331
Raven was 60% against Toph and 58% against Fang (and Betty, funnily enough), it's a pretty small difference especially with lower voter turnout.
No.209457
Anonymous
Replies:>>209458
Toph could definitely beat Fang in present year.
No.209458
Anonymous
Replies:>>209459
>>209457
Somehow I'm not sure of that.
No.209459
Anonymous
Replies:>>211284
>>209458
I am. Fang was a hype train. All Stars kinda proved it's no longer with her. Toph just made finals coming out a year she made semifinals (and probably should have won). She's an evergreen.
No.209461
Anonymous
Is the consensus Toph would have beaten Raven in 2023 without NSA?
No.209462
Anonymous
Replies:>>209463
People also forget that Fang’s stock tanked hard not because the show ended, but HOW that show ended. It was hated so much it soiled a lot of the praise that series had to that point, and this was only days after Ms /co/ ended. If it had a good ending she would have still be a deep contender if participating today
But because of that 2022 really was her last chance to win
No.209463
Anonymous
>>209462
Is there a single cartoon from the last 15 years that DIDN'T have a shitty ending?
No.209464
Anonymous
Replies:>>211283
>>209463
No one outside the fandom would admit it but Owl House.
No.209465
Anonymous
>>209463
Regular Show's was satisfying, at least for me.
No.209466
Anonymous
Replies:>>209467
Mr /co/ tournament begins when?
No.209467
Anonymous
Image:175935482644.png(20kB, 843x202)ssss.png
>>209466
https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/4chan_Tournaments_Wiki
No.209468
Anonymous
>>209467
The timer for Mr. /co/ is wrong btw. It should be 9 days.
No.210783
Anonymous
Replies:>>211279
Image:175935845922.jpg(84kB, 1280x720)maxresdefault (1).jpg
>Dude, check the catalog, It doesn't matter what tab
No.211276
Anonymous
Replies:>>211280
How we ranking the tournaments this year so far?
No.211279
Anonymous
>>210783
>over 50 pages of fucking Soyjaks
The poor janitors
No.211280
Anonymous
>>211276
I can hardly remember how the early team one's went. Ms and all stars were better than /an/ to me at least.
No.211283
Anonymous
No.211284
Anonymous
Replies:>>211285
>>209459
If she was oh so evergreen, why does she keep jobbing?
No.211285
Anonymous
>>211284
Are you retarded.
No.211286
Anonymous
Replies:>>211287
>>211285
Fangfags do tend to be retarded…
No.211287
Anonymous
>>211285
>>211286
She would have won if she were that good.
No.211301
Anonymous
Replies:>>211304
>>209402
Which timer is correct, this one or the one on the wiki?
https://4tourney.wikitide.org/wiki/4chan_Tournaments_Wiki
No.211304
Anonymous
>>211301
Assumed it was starting on Friday, my bad. Still wouldn't mind clarification just in case.
No.211342
ANEgroid !!/Uw+IBaMwoK
Will start soon
No.211348
Anonymous
>>209467
Thanks.
No.211349
ANEgroid !!/Uw+IBaMwoK
Huh, seems like the trip code is different between this site and 4chan. Oh well, yeah it's me.
No.211414
Anonymous
Replies:>>211415
Image:175959205524.jpg(18kB, 360x360)in-space-jam-1996-mr-swackhammer-thinks-the-looney-toons-v0-9htprfy1e9pe1.jpeg
Who are some characters who are very 4chan coded that have little to no presence in the tourneys?
No.211415
Anonymous
Replies:>>211482
>>211414
What is 4chan coded?
No.211482
Anonymous
>>211415
Poorly in php.
No.211581
Anonymous
Image:175980917394.png(452kB, 1314x796)Doctor Ivo Robotnik.png
There is an Egg Match going on in the third round of the /his/ tournament.
No.211584
Anonymous
>>211581
This really is another /tnt/ tournament.
No.211627
Anonymous
>>211581
Eggman made it to round 3?
No.211628
Anonymous
Replies:>>211633
Image:175987803857.jpg(90kB, 460x215)1750817174400227.jpg
>>211581
>Baldry won
No.211629
Anonymous
Predicting Jesus will win the whole thing.
No.211633
Anonymous
>>211628
He was a cool person even outside voicing Robotnik, but he shouldn't have beaten one of the most interesting figures in US history.
No.211634
Anonymous
>>211633
I think you mean the biggest chads in US History.
No.211636
Anonymous
>>211633
This. He was a legitimate great singer and even saved Elton John's life before. Teddy definitely deserved the win though.
No.211649
Anonymous
Image:175991338977.jpg(82kB, 663x868)1627577286254.jpg
>>211581
>beaten Cao Cao, the all time Chinese warlord classic.
>beaten the best US president
It would only be fit that the Eggman proxy gets taken out by the meme pick Nasir. And judging by some of these results it wouldn't surprise me if /tnt/ is responsible for more than just a couple of votes.
No.211653
Anonymous
Our king of colors Gold just hit 4k in spot price! Crazy
No.211678
Anonymous
Memey /his/ E8. Vote count abotu doubled from before too. Gonna call this one /tnt/ corrupted.
No.211680
Anonymous
>>211678
How many of the twelve people here even go to /his/ in the first place? My bet is 0.
No.211681
Anonymous
>>211678
For reference, the current lineup is
>Franklin D. Roosevelt (United States, 1882–1945)
>Edward "Blackbeard" Teach (United Kingdom, 1680–1718)
>Tex Avery (United States, 1908–1980)
>John William "Long John" Baldry (United Kingdom, 1941–2005)
>Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin (Georgia, 1878–1953)
>Captain James Cook (United Kingdom, 1728–1779)
>T.E. Lawrence (United Kingdom, 1888–1935)
>Evel Knievel (United States, 1938–2007)
No.211682
Anonymous
>>211681
Only 3 meme picks out of 8
No.211683
Anonymous
Replies:>>211685
>>211681
I can't wait for the inevitable annoying arguments about /his/ hating fun if Tex, Baldry, or Knievel lose.
No.211684
Anonymous
Tex Avery is nowhere near being a "meme" pick. Do I really have to say this on a prominently /co/ altchan?
No.211685
Anonymous
Replies:>>211687
Image:175996233327.png(23kB, 384x266)emperor 2023.png
>>211683
They are the boring meme picks. Other guys here have some absolutely nutty political and military careers, wars and rivalries while also having altered the course of history. Same goes for many of those guys meme picks won against.
No.211686
Anonymous
>>211684
Look at the post with the number of mentions each guy has on /his/. He's an influential animator, but he's a /tnt/ pick.
No.211687
Anonymous
>>211685
A good meme pick for /his/ would be Emperor Norton but I forgot to nominate him.
No.211690
Anonymous
>>211684
He’d be the kind of guy that would win a Mr. /co/ for real people, but not a straight up human history tourney.
No.211697
Anonymous
Replies:>>211698
Image:175999720934.jpg(17kB, 334x393)c71.jpg
>he's now in the thread complooning about "memepicks" and /tnt/ to an audience that knows not a lick of what he's babbling
No.211698
Anonymous
>>211697
Except /tnt/.
No.211724
Anonymous
Replies:>>211726
/tnt/ ruined emperor of /his/
No.211726
Anonymous
>>211724
That would imply it was ever a good and honesy /his/ tournament to start with. We had nothing to ruin
No.211727
Anonymous
>>211726
It was tiny and had obvious results but it didn't have an Eggman proxy in top 4
No.211728
Anonymous
>>211726
When it had like 15 votes and the most famous figures in history topping it was probably legit.
No.211729
Anonymous
Replies:>>211731
Is the /his/ tournament gonna be first tournament victory for Eggman?
No.211731
Anonymous
Replies:>>211739
>>211729
better not
Baldry was a cool guy but he is NOT winner material, especially for /his/ where he has been mentioned less then 10 times.
No.211739
Anonymous
>>211731
Reminder that this is only happening because /tnt/ can't get over their jobber autism.
No.211745
Anonymous
Replies:>>211746
Baldry and Knieval are cool but how in the fuck can you justify making them semifinalists in a tournament about all the figures in world history lol.
No.211746
Anonymous
>>211745
Easy, you just have to admit that you're voting in a tourney on a subject you don't know/care about
No.211747
Anonymous
Voting FDR 8th to spite that gold-hating gun-banning communist cripple faggot fuckface, worst president EVER
No.211901
Anonymous
If you need anymore evidence on how much /mlp/ is disconnected from the autism these things produce, the preliminary thread has been live for a week and nobody here has noticed
https://boards.4chan.org/mlp/thread/42629164
No.211904
Anonymous
>>211901
Time to meme Eggman into 2nd place.
No.211961
Anonymous
>>211901
Which is extra funny since they started at the same time as /v/ for basically the same reason, Ms. /co/ 2019 was just that big
No.211983
Anonymous
>>211901
>the madlad host is actually considering doing a bracket of 256
No.211999
Anonymous
>FDR is either going to get 7th or 8th
And all is right in the world
No.212181
Anonymous
Image:176020987184.jpg(5kB, 238x148)download.jpg
Isn't it interesting how pretty much every tourney gets a weird unconventional winner by the third year?
>Tom for Mr (in a sense that he was campaign and meme buffed)
>Recette and Batter for Queen and King
>Ms /co/ had this happen on second year with Spinel
>Ms /mlp/ had an IRL horse with no relation to the show win third year
>Tag-Team just massively shat itself on the third year
>Co-Op kinda ruins my narrative here but it was still regarded as not as good as the previous years
>/an/ was always kinda weird but a single pet budgie probably counts as the weirdest winner yet
>now /his/ with this inexplicable boner for Knievel
You could almost create a two years tourney stability theory based on this...
No.212182
Anonymous
Image:176020990103.png(448kB, 1030x761)29323275-p8akfpgm-v4.png
>Knievel won by 2 votes
No.212183
Anonymous
>>212181
You could say Banjo and Kazooie weren't exactly driven by a campaign like the others.
No.212185
Anonymous
>Alexander
>Napoleon
>Eval Knieval
uhh…
No.212186
Anonymous
>>212181
Co-Op got its first weird winner year one. The next two were mostly playing catch-up.
No.212189
Anonymous
I’d say Knieval is easily the worst winner of the year so far but then I remembered anon’s singular budgie won.
No.212204
Anonymous
/his/ and /an/ are just too small to outweigh the /tnt/ influx like objectively.
No.212246
Anonymous
I have an evil idea
Form password, except it accepts anything
If the input doesn't have the actual password or something close to it, then the vote gets disqualified
No.212247
Anonymous
>>212246
This is what the /mlp/ tournaments do btw.
No.212248
Anonymous
Replies:>>212250
>>212246
>>212247
This is smart, not evil. Why haven’t we been doing this?
No.212249
Anonymous
Replies:>>212253
>>212247
i'd know that if they had wiki pages.
No.212250
Anonymous
>>212248
I... I uhhh.... Don't know. Maybe there could even be two passwords?
No.212253
Anonymous
Replies:>>212279
Image:176031084607.png(19kB, 662x144)missing pages.png
>>212249
someone should hit them up
No.212279
Anonymous
>>212253
Speaking of Miss /mlp/....
>October 24'th
No.212286
Anonymous
Please stop trying to cross pollinate with /mlp/. They're like a national park preserve. The natural meta must be left intact.
No.212287
Anonymous
>>212286
Now I want to cross pollinate even more
No.212289
Anonymous
>>212286
I don't want to cross pollinate I want to count the horse population and document it. Just grab one or two ponies for study to write the wiki pages and send them back into the wild once they are complete.
No.212491
Anonymous
>Tomonobu Itagaki, a famous vidya designer, dies during Mr. /co/
Which cartoonist/animator is going to die during King /v/?
No.212492
Anonymous
>>212491
John K
No.212501
Anonymous
>>212491
Lauren Faust
No.212502
Anonymous
>>212491
Robert Crumb
No.212510
Anonymous
Replies:>>212512
Eddy is now the first ever shota E8 for any major tourney.
No.212512
Anonymous
>>212510
On one hand, I hate calling him a shota pick because of what it implies. On the other hand, weird how he's the only 12 and under character to get this far.
No.212670
Anonymous
King is now the only tourney to not have a runner-up winner, or even a past E8 winner.
No.212674
Anonymous
Replies:>>212678
>>212670
and the /trash/ ones?
No.212678
Anonymous
Replies:>>212679
>>212674
What about them?
No.212679
Anonymous
Replies:>>212680
>>212678
Have they had a runner-up winner, or even a past E8 winner?
No.212680
Anonymous
>>212679
Doesn't matter. They're a minor tourney.
No.212697
Anonymous
Does /mlp/ count as a Main tournament, even if it's the lesser of the 3? Maybe a "Mane" tournament perhaps
No.212699
Anonymous
>>212697
It's Main, just ignored
No.212702
Anonymous
>>212697
Sure but it's practically irrelevant.
No.212705
Anonymous
>>212697
Main yes.
No.212717
Anonymous
>>212670
Robotnik has a big chance!
No.212719
Anonymous
Replies:>>212721
Next 2024 tournaments and their dates?
Unrelated, but was Battler really autonominated in 2024?
No.212721
Anonymous
Replies:>>212724
>>212719
2025?
>was Battler really autonominated in 2024?
I think he was meant to autoqualify. Looking at the wiki he seems to have qualified the normal way though.
No.212724
Anonymous
Replies:>>212727
>>212721
Oops, 2025.
What about nominations?
No.212727
Coayynon !hJA5r5.WJw
Replies:>>212728
>>212724
Queen is currently scheduled for November 7th. King for December 5th. Possibly may change.
And Battler went through normal nominations and qualifiers.
No.212728
Anonymous
Replies:>>212730
>>212727
What about the 2023 Qo/v/ 9th place in 2024? Are the 2023 /v/ tournaments the only ones with double-elimination?
No.212729
Anonymous
Replies:>>212730
A full calendar if possible with the respective boards (but I'm not going to participate in the gooner ones).
No.212730
Coayynon !hJA5r5.WJw
>>212728
>What about the 2023 Qo/v/ 9th place in 2024?
SHODAN was also nominated and qualified normally.
>Are the 2023 /v/ tournaments the only ones with double-elimination?
Yes.
>>212729
Not decided on dates beyond King at the moment.
No.212744
Anonymous
The tourney seasons pretty packed.
>ms. followed by /his/ and all stars
>mr. followed by /mlp/ and all stars
>playgirl then playboy
>king and queen
In under a four month period followed assumingly by a slew of team tourneys January onward.
No.212764
Anonymous
Why do we expect /v/ to follow suit like other tournaments when /v/ is known for being contrarian?
No.212769
Anonymous
>>212764
I don't think we do.
No.212788
Anonymous
>>212764
That's just /co/ being upset that /v/ is /v/
No.213096
Anonymous
Replies:>>213109
How many times in the E8 is too many times?
I feel like after 3x you should either win the 4th one or get some other commendatory retirement.
No.213109
Anonymous
>>213096
tbh I would not mind if Chel, Jack, and Hank got some kind of /co/ympus residency retirement not as winners. It would award them for consistent powerhousing and not have them put through another two years of waiting and then likely losing again, and also clear up the E8 for people complaining about the backlog. May come across as a cheap retirement to most though.
No.213119
Anonymous
>>213109
Yeah, as someone who actually wants Jack to win, some kind of participatory "you did well, now get lost" award wouldn't be as satisfactory as him actually winning, and it would lock him out of the possibility entirely. It makes it so that hovering just underneath the E8 threshold makes you more likely to actually win than performing at an elite level consistently but falling short. We already have the E8 timeout as a concession that basically punishes high performers. Functionally, it just cycles high performers and it would do the same thing regardless of how many characters you expand it to unless you just bar the whole bracket, but can you really say then that the next winner accurately reflects what the voters would choose if we didn't twist the tournament into a pretzel trying to artificially force certain outcomes?

I understand that some people vocally complain about it, but it's not a majority. By definition, no character gets to the E8 without a majority wanting them there. The competition is working as designed, but the people complaining just don't want an actual competition anymore, or want a competition based on metrics besides voting. Every rule suggestion I've ever heard on the topic amounts to "remove competition".
No.213123
Anonymous
>>213109
What if we characters who get to the E8 at least 4 or 5 times are no longer barred for a year?
No.213125
Anonymous
>>213123
That... honestly doesn't sounds too terrible.
No.213126
Anonymous
>>213123
If we started at 4, this would immediately go into effect for Chel, Hank and Jack while it could theoretically go into effect this year if Fio, Roll and Kiryu make it to E8 again. If we started at 5 we wouldn't see its effects for another 2 years minimum.
No.213127
Anonymous
>>213123
I actually like this idea. It feels more like a reward for characters who have proven themselves consistent high performers for the better part of a decade, and gives them more opportunities to get properly retired for the people who are tired of seeing them. I think if a character hits E8 3x back to back, or at least 4x overall, that should break their limiter. That's already a rare selection of characters in any tournament.
No.213132
Anonymous
Replies:>>213135
>>213123
I think this'll just get them spited the following year.
No.213135
Anonymous
>>213132
That's not guaranteed, but even if it was, it's a self-correcting solution to the problem of those characters getting to the E8 "too often".
No.213144
Anonymous
>>213123
I like this idea, but you probably thought of it too late to implement it for /co/ this year.
No.213145
Anonymous
>>213144
We could hold a small poll for it during the start of Ms. next year since it would only affect Chel, and only Jack and Hank for Mr.
No.213146
Anonymous
Replies:>>213150
>>213144
Then we wait until Ms. /co/ 2026 (or even Mr. All-Stars) to make a fuss about it because it benefits male characters more, and we don't even know how well Tyr'ahnee will do post-Daffy.
No.213150
Anonymous
>>213146
Kim's the other potential 4x E8 btw. Also I'd take it we'd want to do a separate poll for the /v/ tourneys as well.
No.213151
Anonymous
No more rule changes please
No.213153
Anonymous
>>213151
More rule changes please
No.213154
Anonymous
>>213151
Can we go back to 9 votes? The 12 votes failed to do what it was supposed to.
No.213156
Anonymous
>>213154
It at least did something since there were occasions were a thread would die just before a bot could finish spamming a nomination to 12 replies whereas it definitely would've gotten several times more if it was only 9
Speaking of why do we have nominations spam bots now, it's not even a case of like Augie samefagging his picks because they're his picks, who does and doesn't get spammed by the bots is completely random as far as I can tell
No.213158
Anonymous
>>213156
Why do you keep assuming it was bots instead of deviated autists?
No.213159
Anonymous
Replies:>>213163
>>213156
>It at least did something
We had an increase over 2024 if only slightly. I think we should call it a failed experiment everyone predicted wouldn't work.
No.213162
Anonymous
Replies:>>213164
>>213154
There were about 250 less nominations than Ms. I think it worked.
No.213163
Anonymous
Replies:>>213164
>>213159
The rule was pretty much in response to the crazy nomination rate in ms. /co/, which looked like botting. Mr. was lower, but you could argue Mr. in general is slower (though it did surpass Ms. in nominations before). If the nominations are the same amount in Ms. /co/ next year it can be called a failed experiment.
No.213164
Anonymous
>>213162
Anon, Mr. always has less votes than Ms. That's not a sign of it working.
>>213163
Fair point.
No.213165
Anonymous
>>213154
Just to be sure, the increase in required replies is only for /co/, right? /v/'s minimum is already 12.
No.213185
Anonymous
>>213151
I agree normally but I think this is a good enough idea to bother actually entertaining. It's a nice consolation that gives a small edge to reward the best performers while being infrequent enough that it wouldn't shake up the meta too much.
No.213187
Anonymous
>>213109
>Let’s make the cuckshed canon
>>213123
I am not for this either because then I think people get fatigued with these characters every single year and they get very diminished results or really hated if they make round 4 or better every year
Best answer is just to eventually let them win. For Mr there were three characters people kept talking about needing to retire and one won so I do not see the hurry
No.213221
Anonymous
>>213187
>they get very diminished results or really hated if they make round 4 or better every year
These would be mutually exclusive outcomes and people are already not pleased when characters get past round 4 repeatedly, as evident by the mere suggestion that they should be given the boot permanently for doing so. I don't agree with that solution, so the only options left will not be pleasing to that crowd either way.

The options are keeping things as they are, with all the complaints that entails, or just try to cycle those characters out as quickly as possible, which would yield basically the same complaints but with more opportunities to actually resolve them. Or, as you say, the characters just stop doing as well, which would also resolve those complaints.
No.213256
Anonymous
Hello.

None of you will probably believe this, but this is cum. Before anyone asks, no, I don't have my trip on because I deleted the password connected to it. If you need verification, then it's probably best to ask Black Hand to verify it's me.

I'm not here about hosting, but to apologize for my actions. It will probably mean jack shit to you people, but I am sorry. You people expect a level of maturity from a host, and I didn't provide that in the slightest. I shouldn't have used the Joker muzzle art for one of the OPs, focused so much on what people were saying, and run a funpost tournament when there was an actual tournament going on. All I wanted to do was make you people smile, to make up for everything NSA did, but all I managed to do was make a ass of myself, and I'm sincerely sorry about that.

I don't expect any of you to accept my apology, but I feel as if I owe you all something after storming off like a spoiled child.
No.213259
Anonymous
Replies:>>213361
>>213187
People are still fatiguied when the same characters make E8 regardless
No.213361
Anonymous
>>213259
That is the issue of the voters no?
No one is forcing anyone to vote Hank or Jack in the Elite 8 four times, but that is what the board wants to vote for so it is a bit silly to then complain you are fatigued by them if you keep voting them.
Hundreds of other options who never made E8 exist to select, but when we get the stats of
>Ed, Edd, Donald, Scrooge: 0 Elite 8s
>Jack, Hank: 4 Elite 8s each
Then we are kind of past that potential of fatigue whining since the other options are rejected each time. And even when first timers are selected (like Eddy, Goofy, Doom) apparently it is not enough if there are still many 3-4xers
No.213366
Anonymous
Replies:>>213515
>>213256
You should apologize to Balls
No.213515
Anonymous
Image:176134513736.png(31kB, 589x199)google emails.png
>>213366
I honestly don't know if Balls even wants to hear me out, so I emailed Coayyon an apology for my actions and behavior a few days ago.

Also, here's a screenshot as some proof that this is Cum. I'm not sure if this is enough, but take it.
No.213519
Anonymous
>>213256
>>213515
In your efforts to not become a NSA, you ended up becoming a Temp. Take this as a lesson for your future...
No.213520
Anonymous
Replies:>>213529
>>213515
I don't think you should post again, but good to see you at least want to make things right.
TBH I kindof wish NSA came to say "Sorry for any trouble".
No.213522
Anonymous
Replies:>>213527
>>213515
Have you been following tourneys at all since then, or did you just bail completely after Mr?
No.213527
Anonymous
>>213522
No. I didn't find out that Spiderman won until recently.
No.213529
Anonymous
>>213520
Sorry HOST again, didn't mean to type the "P"
No.213644
Anonymous
Replies:>>213645
Image:176151299047.png(27kB, 848x433)random.png
Didn't see nobody talking about it, but the /mlp/ tournament voted for randomized brackets.
No.213645
Anonymous
Replies:>>213646
>>213644
>70 responses
I thought this shit got like 350 Mr. /co/ numbers.
No.213646
Anonymous
>>213645
this was a form before the tournament started
No.213755
Ballsanon !th0DR5qBxs
>>213515
yeah I'm not too bothered about all that, shit happens
No.213759
Anonymous
Replies:>>213762
All-Stars is today
No.213762
Anonymous
Replies:>>213780
>>213759
No it isn't
No.213778
Anonymous
Replies:>>213874
>someone reported the playgirl tournament form and got It taken down
No.213780
Anonymous
>>213762
Yes it is.
No.213864
Anonymous
Replies:>>213865
>three separate tourneys on 4chan going on at once
>all three have the same metafag funposting in some form
No.213865
Anonymous
>>213864
Ms. being good had ripple effects for the others.
No.213866
Anonymous
Image:176168113412.jpg(34kB, 640x360)1754631087033.jpg
>>213865
YOU FOOLS
YOU'VE MESSED WITH THE NATURAL ORDERRRRRRRRRRRR
No.213869
Anonymous
>>213865
My fault. Ms. is my favorite so I made a wish on a monkey paw. I have no regrets.
No.213874
Anonymous
Image:176169677314.gif(3.26MB, 360x360)1761612690586.gif
>>213778
Ur ur ur, it was me. You're welcome, Roxxy and Chica.
No.213899
Anonymous
Moving Ms. /mlp/ to the top IQ tournament spot after the Dan200 revelation.
No.213953
Anonymous
Replies:>>213954
I think some people have chronic tourneyfaggotry
No.213954
Anonymous
>>213953
You think?
No.213959
Anonymous
Replies:>>213960
What the fuck been up with capcha on 4chan lately.
No.213960
Anonymous
>>213959
I was about to ask if it was shitting itself for anyone else
No.213974
Anonymous
Image:176192026456.gif(3.99MB, 720x540)watch the pumpkin watch.gif
>HAPPY HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
>HALLOWEEN!
>HALLOWEEN!
>HAPPY HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
>HALLOWEEN!
>HALLOWEEN!
>Silver Shamrock!
No.214003
Coayynon !hJA5r5.WJw
The /co/ tourneys this year are now concluded.
Reminder to everyone Queen /v/ will begin one week from now 7:00 PM EST. Mind daylight saving time changing in the US.
https://itsalmo.st/time-for-queen-v-2025-1i9p
No.214006
Anonymous
Anon announced in mr. /co/ afterparty he is making a female /a/ tourney btw.
No.214007
Anonymous
>>214006
Wha- don't leave us hanging. DON'T LEAVE US HANGING.
No.214008
Anonymous
>>214006
Some retard is suggesting doing female and male tournaments in December right alongside King. Seems like a bad idea to try and rush it out. Same with a /tv/ tournament, but I can at least see how that could slot in long as it's not the same exact week as Queen or King. Don't think we should be touching /a/ this year.
No.214009
Anonymous
>>214006
And he comes across as another bullheaded retard. Chances this is the same Queen of /a/fag last year?
No.214018
Anonymous
It's up…dear god it's a mess.
No.214019
Anonymous
Replies:>>214034
>>214018
Why does God hate us?
No.214022
Anonymous
>he just copypasted the /co/ tourney OP and pastebin
lmao.
No.214024
Anonymous
>told /co/
>told /trash on Playgirl
>told fucking /mlp/
>told /tnt/
This isn’t /a/ and we know it
No.214025
Anonymous
Replies:>>214047
Image:176201970430.png(12kB, 939x90)lole.png
the funniest part is the blatantly obvious people from here pretending to be /a/utists
No.214026
Anonymous
I mean... it COULD work this time guys...
No.214028
Anonymous
Replies:>>214030
Even if it works there is zero argument to be made that this was a completely organic tournament run by /a/. He’s linked it on /trash/ and /v/ and /co/ and /mlp/ and here.

/v/ and /mlp/ started on their own, no /co/ involvement
No.214029
Anonymous
Image:176202199741.gif(1.91MB, 400x233)patrick grere.gif
I'm too busy right now. This is going to fail. I shouldn't even bother. But maybe....
No.214030
Anonymous
>>214028
The biggest, the riggest, nobody does it more than us I tell you, the people have been saying it, and theyre right, because nobody fucks shit up like us
No.214031
Anonymous
Baki CHADS.
No.214033
Anonymous
Replies:>>214042
Image:176202275012.png(891kB, 1080x823)p01wv4bwvz991.png
Got another ban from 4chan. Might try to appeal it later.
So assuming my ban doesn't get appealed what are you guys up to? Any plans for the next 3 days? Any of you hang out on any other boards on this site?
No.214034
Anonymous
>>214018
Wait, what's going on?
>>214019
Want the list?
No.214035
Anonymous
/a/ banned for 3 days
No.214036
Anonymous
Image:176202340265.jpg(137kB, 1000x1107)1561692067317.jpg
>
No.214042
Anonymous
Image:176203034157.png(178kB, 693x373)eggman middle finger laughing.png
>>214033
Just wipe your cookies and reset your router, brother. Fuck them tranny jannies.
No.214047
Anonymous
>>214025
>falseflaggers trying to SABOTAGE the tournament
>everyone is ignoring them and having fun
Somehow I knew it would be like this.
I...BELIEVED...
No.214056
Anonymous
Replies:>>214085
If the /a/ tourney goes fine I honestly think we should try running /aco/ again.
No.214067
Anonymous
owari da....
No.214069
Anonymous
several people are apparently getting banned for trying to report the tournament, what the fuck did one of us get a mod position
No.214072
Anonymous
Replies:>>214225
I'm just sad it had to get advertised on so many different boards, there's zero way you can claim this was 100% /a/ done with no outside board involvement like you can for /co/ and /v/s first tournaments
No.214074
Anonymous
And it's dead and the host is apparently banned
No.214075
Anonymous
Okay /a/ is not fucking happening. You HAVE to at least talk to mods about it beforehand, but no way you can just charge in like the other boards.
No.214085
Anonymous
>>214056
This aged like milk
No.214095
Anonymous
Well, on the bright side, now there isn't any scheduling conflict with Queen.
No.214153
Anonymous
you know what fuckit
/b/ tournament
No.214154
Anonymous
Yeah, I'm starting to think /tv/ doesn't care for hosting a tournament at all. They're reacting way worse than the /a/ anons.
No.214157
Anonymous
>they made a /tv/ tournament right after
tourneyfaggots calm your damn tits
No.214158
Anonymous
>>214154
Anon, how many of those initial /a/ anons were even /a/ anons at all? It got linked here, on the /co/ All-Stars thread. in /mlp/, in /Playgirl/, and on a /v/ thread.

At least with /tv/ we know the first 30 pages are all /tv/ anons since no one else knew, and we know what they think of us.
No.214159
Anonymous
>2 images
fucking grim
No.214161
Anonymous
Replies:>>214162
>>214154
The /a/ one was raided to hell and back, it wasn't mostly /a/ users anyway. This is organic
No.214162
Anonymous
>>214161
You can tell it's organic since no one wants it and want the mods to delete it.
No.214163
Anonymous
>someone lost their minds over the /b/ tourney proposal
LMAO
No.214165
Anonymous
Some people from here are starting to trickle in now and from /co/, but we finally have a blind sample of what they think of this from before Dr. Green showed up.

It is very telling
No.214166
Anonymous
lmao this /tv/ backlash.
No.214167
Anonymous
>>214154
Doubting hard most of those were actual /a/ anons
No.214168
Anonymous
Image:176204440409.jpg(103kB, 1242x691)qdhkyrinpwn71.jpg
I think tourneys suck as board culture threads
No.214171
Anonymous
OP delete the /tv/ thread before you get us all killed
No.214177
Anonymous
>someone posted it on /v/
>nominations only start to happen then
yeah a pattern is starting to form
No.214182
Anonymous
Honestly the posting style between the people trying to go like "enjoy having the tournaments banned" seem kinda similiar. Feels like another dedicated funposter is on the loose.
No.214183
Anonymous
Some asshole is trying to make damn sure this year's Mr. /co/ goes down in infamy.
No.214184
Anonymous
To any /tv/fags viewing here, I hope it's evident that, yes, we were also caught off-guard by this shit.
No.214185
Anonymous
>>214184
A couple of them have zero clue what's going on, some are just hurling slurs, and some seem to know about the tournaments and not like them
No.214187
Anonymous
The fact that OP hasn't deleted it proves he's an idiot. The fact /tv/ is so united in not wanting this makes me question how many people not from /a/ were at the /a/ attempt
No.214191
Anonymous
>>214184
I think that was the plan
No.214192
Anonymous
Replies:>>214199
there are no posts about this on /v/ you fuckwards
No.214193
Anonymous
/tv/ is officially off the list forever and I'm increasingly doubting how much actual /a/ users wanted Empress with how many other boards and tournament threads got linked there
No.214199
Anonymous
Replies:>>214203
>>214192
I think that's the easiest way to tell there is some retarded falseflag about this, there are no meta threads about this on /v/ at all and haven't been for days or even weeks in regard to just regular ol' queen or king. If someone's bringing up /v/ out of nowhere they're either completely keyed into some meta nonsense or just trying to cause drama over nothing.
No.214203
Anonymous
>>214199
apparently some circus fags brought it up in a general
No.214205
Anonymous
Replies:>>214210
I think the OP abandoned the thread
No.214206
Anonymous
>>214193
I would think jannies getting involved both years means /a/ is off the list forever too.
No.214208
Anonymous
>>214193
I don't want a /tv/ tournament mainly because it's clear the hype isn't there. That's perfectly fine by me. I would love to see a hype male tournament, but what's the point if the board's not in the mood for it? At least/a/ seemed somewhat on board both times, before the retarded hosts ruined it.
No.214210
Anonymous
>>214205
ah jinxed it
No.214211
Anonymous
>>214208
Did they actually or was it all offboarders
No.214214
Anonymous
Seeing a few of the anons in the thread is making me feel /tv/ might be too schizophrenic to bother risking a tournament regardless. They seem really defensive over anything they perceive as a potential board raid, even being told calmly what's actually going on. It's making some of the anger I've seen from /co/ and /v/ regulars toward the other board seem soft in comparison.
No.214215
Anonymous
>>214208
>before the retarded hosts ruined it.
Let's be real, regardless of hosts, /a/ will not permit a tournament to be hosted.
No.214217
Anonymous
>>214215
Last year seemed fine until it got fucked up. I do think it could have worked if the host wasn't a retard and talked to the mods first.
No.214219
Anonymous
Replies:>>214221
>>214217
Last year was off literally the moment the actual tournament started. I think it's literally just case of the OP getting lucky that the mods were asleep rather than the tournament being banned for poor performance or some nonsense.
No.214220
Anonymous
Replies:>>214226
>>214217
I'm kind of glad last year did not work out.
This year was quite unfortunate though. Host seemed reasonable, if highly unprepared.
No.214221
Anonymous
>>214219
Though, I do agree that talking to the mods is literally step one they should try.
No.214222
Anonymous
Replies:>>214244
I think it's time that we make like Jack Skellington, and be content with what we've got. Now that I think about it, the idea that mixing two completely different holidays leads to disaster is reminding me of something....
No.214224
Anonymous
Replies:>>214230
The first 30 or so posts are before anyone not on /tv/ knew about it. They don't want us
No.214225
Anonymous
>>214072
Part of it is the fact /a/ has been reduced to few users who all stick in their own generals. Even a year ago it wasn't this bad. So seeming organic there is nearly impossible except maybe in december
>>214215
Exactly. The mods wouldn't allow it even if /a/ posters themselves want it
No.214226
Anonymous
Replies:>>214227
>>214220
Did you really want to have an /a/ tourney running at the same time as Queen though?
No.214227
Anonymous
>>214226
I'd care more for an /a/ tourney than Queen. It'd have only collided for like two days anyways.
No.214228
Anonymous
After watching /tv/ I don't believe most of the Empress anons were actually from /a/
No.214230
Anonymous
Replies:>>214232
>>214224
the first posts are all about the /a/ tourney and other tourneys
No.214231
Anonymous
>/a/ will never have a tournament
>Playgirl that has no restrictions on who can compete is a furfag mess with barely any /a/ picks that qualify and the ones that do always job before E8
This sucks ass.
No.214232
Anonymous
>>214230
It's a mix of both, but the WTF replies and the raid calls are all /tv/ and none of it is positive.
No.214234
Anonymous
>>214231
Why not submit furfag /a/ picks
No.214235
Anonymous
>>214231
I'm telling you:
Ms. /h/.
No.214238
Anonymous
Replies:>>214241
>>214234
This is equivalent to telling a /co/ that has no tournament representation to vote for Transformers in Saigar.
No.214239
Anonymous
>>214234
Didn't Beerus get to 2nd?
No.214241
Anonymous
Replies:>>214246
>>214238
The Cybertron trilogy would be cleared for /a/ so that's not a bad idea. Though wouldn't /m/ make more sense?
No.214244
Anonymous
Replies:>>214247
>>214222
I think we should pull back before we got shot down out of the sky like Jack
No.214246
Anonymous
Image:176204898973.jpg(3.28MB, 2700x3200)__optimus_prime_transformers_and_1_more_drawn_by_kome_cola__05d2d19c166c805bfebc1413e1eb8131.jpg
>>214241
You mean Armada? Yeah it'd count, even G1 and the movie do since it's by Toei if I recall. Issue is that the /m/ tournament fucking died last year if I recall.
No.214247
Anonymous
>>214244
>with no survivors
No.214248
Anonymous
Replies:>>214258
>>214246
Yeah and good luck trying to get one running on /m/ now without it getting derailed by faggots like Duel.
No.214250
Anonymous
Yeah, this was stupid. I'm done dwelling in the /tv/ thread.
No.214258
Anonymous
>>214246
>>214248
>inb4 some dumbass tries making a /m/ tournament tonight
No.214270
Anonymous
Replies:>>214277
So, who's gonna take Balls' role in the host roster? Bill?
No.214277
Anonymous
Replies:>>214278
>>214270
What happened, did Big Brother finally ban 4chan?
No.214278
Anonymous
>>214277
He’ll survive for Queen at least, but the gavel’s likely landing in December.
No.214333
Anonymous
I think we should be happy with the tournaments we have and focus on fixing our own very chronic and recurring issues(which are mounting as of late) instead of continuing to recklessly expand against the wishes of other boards members and/or their janitors
No.214337
Anonymous
>>214333
I agree; I even think we need less side tourney additions to the main tournaments. Stuff like /cov/ is pushing it while heroes and villains is just redundant.
No.214338
Anonymous
>>214333
>cut back on side tournament autism
>segregate hosting a bit more
>both of these should reduce crossboarding
>if the thread autism and crossboarding reduces we can get away with more off-season discussion threads and the occasional tourney promotion thread which will boost turnout
>More casual turnout helps smother hardcore tourney autism and lessen crossboarding impacts
Basically we need to get a positive loop going to undo the negative one we've been slowly getting into for years
No.214340
Anonymous
>>214337
We already got the best possible winners for /cov/ twice anyway.
No.214342
Anonymous
Replies:>>214344
>>214337
I'd be happy if we could get down to one main minor tournament on /tnt/ per board (Tag Team and Co-Op) and one or two side tournament per main tournament thread thread (Barred is already struggling a lot and has the vaguest criteria so maybe cut that). Honestly in my ideal world we'd do 256 brackets like /mlp/ does(which would solve some other issues too), get rid of Next, and keep Bottom the single side tournament, but that's probably asking too much
No.214344
Anonymous
>>214342
What was stopping 256 brackets on the other boards again?
No.214345
Anonymous
>>214344
Dunno, with how much we've automated everything that argument no longer holds up(and /mlp/ is less automated than we are).
No.214347
Anonymous
Probably would have made more sense to have a 256 as part of the big eight year celebration but maybe we could have it as our big season 2 opener.
No.214348
Anonymous
Advice to the hosts: maybe avoid having Reimu in thread OPs as much as possible this year. There's apparently some massive vendetta a schizo has against /v/hu, and I'd rather not see the main tournament threads filled with CP.
No.214349
Anonymous
>Retire Barred(vague criteria and increasingly forced)
>Retire Next because now they're allowed into the main
>Expand to 256 girls included to take advantage of the automation
>Keep Bottom untouched
>Cut /cov/(crossboarding autism needs to be checked) and Heroes/Villains, stick to Tag Team and Co-Op on here.
That would be by suggest for improving things going forward
No.214350
Anonymous
>>214348
>we now have to avoid showing one of our winners at all cost because one giganigger spamming CSAM
I'm worried for next week.
No.214351
Anonymous
>>214348
I'd be safer and avoid any Touhou period.
No.214352
Anonymous
>>214349
>>Keep Bottom untouched
The format goes untouched but put Guymanbro on that to make up for Barred. I don't trust that substitute guy.
No.214353
Anonymous
>>214348
Yeah, what the fuck was that about. I didn't even see any images thankfully, but the stealth thread still had a shitton of shady looking links. I do NOT want to even allow that stuff as a possibility.
No.214354
Anonymous
>>214352
He was a little suspicious in Mr /co/.
No.214355
Anonymous
Replies:>>214357
>>214352
Sure, sounds fair to me. Bottom seems fun as a side tournament and organic, like the Razzies. Barred was always super situational and Next was made specifically because people wanted 256 brackets so if we do that no need for it. Little minigame type things that aren't really side tournaments like Shen's Bounty Hunt or Literally How can stay too.

You guys otherwise like the suggestion? Cut barred and next, expand the tournament to 256 with an extra round, put Guyman on Bottom. I mean trash survived an extra day just fine we can do 256 if we want...
No.214357
Anonymous
>>214355
This would be the start of S2 so it would be a great time to clean up things a bit. People already are turning on Barred so that's fine, and Next isn't needed if there's 256 girls in Ms. /co/.
No.214360
Anonymous
Imagine all the new blood and pleasant returns we'll get with 256 brackets.
No.214391
Anonymous
>>214349
>Expand to 256 girls included to take advantage of the automation
Poor Psy if this actually happens,
No.214393
Anonymous
256 has always been a stupid idea.
No.214395
Anonymous
No.214396
Anonymous
>>214393
It should be cut down to 32 instead
No.214398
Anonymous
Guys, there's a candle on the screen.
No.214399
Anonymous
>>214398
You're imagining things.
No.214402
Anonymous
>>214398
Well blow it out.
No.214406
Anonymous
>>214398
Happy birthday anon, make a wish.
No.214421
Anonymous
>unanimous agreement to cut barred
damn just like that? I thought we liked the table scraps bracket
No.214422
Anonymous
Replies:>>214430
>>214421
The problem with Barred is that it just isn't actually Barred anymore. It's funpost nominations made purely to enter that tournament mixed with losers that failed to qualify. It insists upon itself.
No.214423
Anonymous
>>214421
I think the posters themselves should decide via vote but barred's the side tournament that relies heavily on campaigning to work. If all the funny/interesting candidates get crushed it stops being funny real quickly.
No.214424
Anonymous
Replies:>>214425
>>214344
Increasing Psyanon's workload
No.214425
Anonymous
>>214424
As well as the bracket anon's. And requiring too much time to vote in.
No.214429
Anonymous
Replies:>>214432
Image:176208995355.png(580kB, 1280x688)Kingv24_barred_oc_3.png
>>214421
>unanimous
Don't take what you see on this board as gospel. Remember how "everyone" here harped on about whitelist characters on /v/ only for the actual board to be 75% in favour of keeping them in some form? Barred is not going anywhere unless the hosts remove it without a vote.
No.214430
Anonymous
Replies:>>214434
>>214422
>mixed with losers that failed to qualify.
It was always like that by design. Barred by series limit was one of the requisites meaning a legit character could win it.
No.214432
Anonymous
>>214429
Oh yeah, why didn't he get shit for being a "coper pick"?
No.214434
Anonymous
Replies:>>214436
>>214430
I think he meant that it's people who failed to qualify not people who were barred by series limit as in actually barred
No.214435
Anonymous
Replies:>>214437
>the /tv/ tourney archived
I think this proves that a /tv/ tournament is never happening
No.214436
Anonymous
>>214434
That still makes them coper picks in the sense they get a second chance after being series limited. Like this is what people mean by vague requisites; you can't call it a shit post/meme tournament when you allow characters in like that.
No.214437
Anonymous
>>214435
At least this matter is finally solved. Good riddance.
No.214438
Anonymous
Image:176209868551.png(64kB, 1062x909)Kingv24_barred_oc_62.png
>>214432
First time I heard anyone being called a "coper pick" is today. And not a single barred character got any shit except SHITven BITCHverse. Last barred was pretty much universally regarded as a good time.
No.214439
Anonymous
>>214432
Because it was a King of /v/ tournament, lol.
No.214440
Anonymous
>>214438
you can thank Soundwave for turning people against Barred
No.214441
Anonymous
>>214440
I thought it was Brisby
No.214442
Anonymous
>>214440
>people turning against barred
I saw more people calling out the drama over a side tournament than anything else.
No.214453
Anonymous
Replies:>>214454
>>214438
Marzipan hated Dante before it was cool
No.214454
Anonymous
>>214453
Glad we could finally agree
No.214456
Anonymous
>the novelization of A New Hope was released a whole year before the movie
Finally, people will stop asking for more Star Wars characters in /co/.
No.214482
Anonymous
>>214344
Besides the increasing workload for some people it takes double the time to set up, double the time go vote, adds on an additional day which could be testy to the mods, and diminishes the prestige of qualifying. People are gonna start pointing to the pony board now over rule shit cause i guess /tnt/ successfully integrated them in the meta, but forget it's basically a hermit kingdom with a hugely different and more tightly knit culture, and their rules votes are 1/5th of their voterbase in a pre-tourney thread.
No.214483
Anonymous
Replies:>>214484
>>214482
>and diminishes the prestige of qualifying.
This I don't get. It's a popularity tournament not the Oscars.
No.214484
Anonymous
Replies:>>214485
>>214483
Right... so there's not much point letting in a bunch of 128+ seeds.
No.214485
Anonymous
Replies:>>214486
>>214484
The fact that we have a next 128 indicates people want to see those extra seeds compete.
No.214486
Anonymous
Replies:>>214487
>>214485
And they can so in next 128.
No.214487
Anonymous
Replies:>>214488
>>214486
Why not just put in the main bracket instead of making all these coper tournaments?
No.214488
Anonymous
Replies:>>214491
>>214487
The reasons were already explained, anon.
No.214489
Anonymous
>>214482
>People are gonna start pointing to the pony board now over rule shit cause i guess /tnt/ successfully integrated them in the meta
I just find it funny one guy managed to do it single handedly but it's somehow too much of a workload for a team of four people.
Also mods getting testy isn't a strong argument when they okayed All Stars twice.
No.214491
Anonymous
>>214488
Those were poor excuses. Really, /tnt/ doesn't want to give up the side tourneys because they'll lose more influence over time.
No.214492
Anonymous
>>214489
How long did it take him to do it?
No.214493
Anonymous
128 is a perfect balance for numbers, intrigue, and time and it's how shit's already been done everywhere for years. I don't care what ponyfags decide to do one year. The only reason to double it at this point is coper's shit so lowcard fans can get their picks in and technically say they qualified.
No.214494
Anonymous
>>214492
Not as long as you would since it's one guy.
No.214495
Anonymous
>>214482
Also just declaring it when we don't have a potential replacement for Balls lined up isn't a good idea.
No.214496
Anonymous
Replies:>>214516
>>214493
And a billion side tourneys is not coper shit how?
No.214497
Anonymous
>we're not allowed to copy ideas from other tournaments we find exciting
But remember, we have to do a three player /v/ tournament because /co/ wants trios.
No.214498
Anonymous
Replies:>>214499
>>214489
>>214492
>>214494
I think that "one guy can do it" isn't the best argument since people like him and Stats are rare.
No.214499
Anonymous
Replies:>>214500
>>214498
The argument is less one guy can do it and more "we have four guys that can do it".
No.214500
Anonymous
>>214499
Taking a look at how our hosts have been handling the tournaments as of recently... LOL no.
No.214502
Anonymous
>>214493
>128 is a perfect balance for numbers, intrigue, and time and it's how shit's already been done everywhere for years.
"It's how it's been done for years" doesn't hold up when the rules and format have been tweaked for years. We didn't even have a FOTM rule until Spinel came along.
No.214503
Anonymous
Replies:>>214505
>>214502
You mean the second year?
No.214505
Anonymous
Replies:>>214534
>>214503
Looney Tunes being series limited was also something done for years but we decided to change that.
No.214508
Anonymous
Replies:>>214570
Image:176211528374.png(752kB, 642x910)170294105282.png
>People still trying to advocate for a 256 bracket
Stop, we're not doing that. It's a terrible idea.
>Making the hosts' jobs even harder with a bigger bracket full of shitters
>Making threads even more of a mess
>Making qualifying piss easy because any goober can campaign once or twice and immediately get into bracket
>Making poor Psyanon when he's already struggled with running late recently
>All this for some shitters who can't make top 128 normally who will probably never win the tournament anyways
Stick to your cope side bracket, it's not happening. And yes, I am every schizo you think I am. I'm NSA, I'm Balls, I'm Coayy, I'm the Queen of /a/ guy, I'm Mandingo Martin, I'm Hexfag, I'm Psyanon, I'm Numnuts, and yes I'm even Stats.
No.214512
Anonymous
>>214482
Yeah and in the first year something like 70% of the nominees qualified, second year about 45%. Now it's 12%-10% on /co/ and around 7% on /v/.

Plus it allows us to get rid of Next, which alongside getting rid of Barred will calm down the autism levels a lot which will make the mods happier which might allow us to promote things more elsewhere. (Bottom can stay that's fun, that's the Razzies)
No.214515
Anonymous
>>214494
That doesn't answer the question. I've yet to get someone to tell me how long it actually took him. Looking at the archive it seems about 3 hours.
No.214516
Anonymous
>>214496
They're just side things that can be ignored.
>>214502
We're not talking about a little tweak here. Doubling the size of the fucking tourney is a whole different thing.
No.214518
Anonymous
>>214512
I hope you realize that making the main bracket 256 will just make Next 128 the Next 256, so that the Top 512 will be represented in brackets. Bottom would also likely follow suit, because the side brackets are ultimately monkey see monkey do as far as their rules go.

Also
>make the tournament go for an extra day
>this will make the mods happy
???
No.214520
Anonymous
>>214512
>Plus it allows us to get rid of Next, which alongside getting rid of Barred will calm down the autism levels a lot
Nothing is going to calm down autism levels in these tournaments
>which will make the mods happier which might allow us to promote things more elsewhere
Why would the mods give a shit? They definitely don't lurk these threads.
No.214521
Anonymous
>>214512
Bottom became even worse than shit the moment Augie took over hosting duties and getting his characters to win that.
No.214522
Anonymous
Replies:>>214534
Another aspect to consider is that 256 would give the Franchise Rule that many more chances to take effect, meaning that many more characters get Franchise-ruled, meaning the actual lower limit of qualifying characters will be much lower than the actual 256th seed.
No.214523
Anonymous
>>214482
>it's basically a hermit kingdom with a hugely different and more tightly knit culture
Yep I don't know why this part is getting ignored. It was a vote of like 45/75 anons firstly. Then mind that /mlp/ is a single franchise board of a pretty unified mind. There isn't series limits of disqualifications to keep track of. And the tourneys pretty slow paced anyways and people aren't onna mind waiting several hours for a setup.
I'm not aware if their qualifier form used images but if they did that probably sped up the round making process too since it's just a matter of copypaste. Round forms take a while in /co/ and /v/ probably mostly cause the images have to be found, opened and pasted from the archives.
No.214527
Anonymous
>>214512
>autism bad
No.214530
Anonymous
Replies:>>214533
What if the required amount of (you)s to enter increased every thread.
No.214531
Anonymous
Image:176212096142.jpg(1.02MB, 2461x4497)Hector.jpg
Feliz Dia de Muertos
Who doesn't like a visit from cousin Hector!
No.214533
Anonymous
Replies:>>214536
>>214530
You just make the samefags samefag harder, it changes nothing.
No.214534
Anonymous
I do not think the 256 character bracket should be considered. Too much bloat for what is going to be blowout losses to get us to our same end results. More rounds is going to seem too long for people with as low participation as they get. There is still some prestige of making top 128 that it is actually quite difficult.
What /mlp/ does is irrelevant as well as different jannies have different rules. Just because they can does not mean we can. Same as how we can have tournaments, but try asking /a/ if they can.
>>214505
Looney Tunes exemption was being debated seriously for years, at one point hosts were planning to implement it regardless. This is the first time I have seen serious discussions of doing 256 which were not immediately shot down by everyone
>>214522
This would lead to another change to series rule if not elimination of it entirely. Rolf being barred for making top 20 because Ed Edd n Eddy were in the top 8 while some 300 seeds are qualifying will not go down well
No.214535
Anonymous
Replies:>>214568
>>214534
I agree. Also next 128 is not a cope tourney. A real cope tourney would be making a new round dedicated to see if the winner of next 128 can steal the win of the main bracket's winner. Isn't that right, NSA?
No.214536
Anonymous
Replies:>>214537
>>214533
The harder they samefag the faster the thread archives and the higher the (you) limit goes.
No.214537
Anonymous
>>214536
Threads already hit bump limit quickly, having more samefagging does not do anything.
No.214538
Anonymous
>>214534
Guy who opened up the 256 discussion, I was kind of assuming we'd go back to the 2018-2019 series limit of 5 that we had in place Pre-Spinel.
Ironically we originally had a series limit of 3 for everyone and 5 for the big 3, but the threads forced 2018OP during an takeover to change it to 5 for everyone and unlimited for the big 3. Then the 5 got changed back to 3 when Stats took over in response to Spinelgate)
No.214539
Anonymous
Replies:>>214540
>>214534
>This is the first time I have seen serious discussions of doing 256 which were not immediately shot down by everyone
Combination of Next proving the base support is there(Next was partially made to placate those people) and the fact we're aware of /mlp/ pulling it off with fewer people and less automation without issue.
No.214540
Anonymous
>>214539
The forms don't use automation in the first place. Th bot is for the sheet.
No.214541
Anonymous
With things being more quiet right now, feel fine reposting this in this thread.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd4133riLNqGsCRMyG-k6V0BOAxus5m5Jbj0M-y1FmjY4rMhw/viewform

Doing a form out of curiosity to see how anons here actually rank /v/'s winners, before Queen begins in a few days. Will likely close it on Wednesday or early Thursday. It's less of a serious vote and more a fun vote out of curiosity.
No.214543
Anonymous
Replies:>>214551
You could argue the slightly looser requirements are more accurate to how it was it in 2018-2019. Let's look at /co/: In 2018, 83% of girls got in. In 2019, it was down to 36%. Since then, it's varied from 12% at best (2020 and 2023) to 9% at worst (2022 and 2025). /v/ can get as low as 8%. We started at 83%.

We had a lot of characters show up in 2018 or 2019 who have never been able to make it back since due to how much tighter the brackets have become, or never made it far again. Hell, we had to loosen the restrictions on Literally Who in 2024 and rename it this year to Literally How because nobody meeting the original qualifications(first timer who is really obscure) was getting in anymore. Increasing the bracket to 256 would get /v/'s qualification percentage to 16-18% and /co/s 18-24%. That's still lower than 2019's 36% and waaaay lower than 2018. I'd hardly call it coper tier. You'd still need 70-80 votes to qualify based on last years numbers.
No.214551
Anonymous
>>214543
Why does any of this matter. The percentages should be low if anything.
No.214568
Anonymous
>>214535
All side tourneys are cope tourneys by default. Bottom and Barred were from the NSA era.
No.214570
Anonymous
Replies:>>214581
>>214508
I don't get why the next 128 are inherently considered shitters.
No.214571
Anonymous
Replies:>>214576
>>214534
>Looney Tunes exemption was being debated seriously for years, at one point hosts were planning to implement it regardless.
And considering how much people regretted that rule after it got voted in, it shows that /co/ is even worse than thinking things through than /v/.
No.214576
Anonymous
Replies:>>214591
>>214571
>how much people regretted that rule after it got voted in
The whole complaint came down to "we just didn't need any more rule votes right now" from a few people. There's nothing disagreeable about the limit reduction.
No.214581
Anonymous
>>214570
>a hypothetical 256 bracket would bring in more Disney and comic book picks
I'm nooooooticing.
No.214591
Anonymous
>>214576
There's plenty disagreeable with it, from blatant favoritism to it being unnecessary.
No.214613
Anonymous
Replies:>>214619
All series limits are gay metafag rules btw.
No.214619
Anonymous
>>214613
I would be fine with series limits if it was consistent but if exceptions keep getting made you might as well just toss it aside. What next, Total Drama gets series limit exception?
No.214623
Anonymous
Replies:>>214624
How did Kingdom Hearts do in /co/v/ stuff? I just remembered that they exist.
No.214624
Anonymous
>>214623
Pretty badly considering they're one of the few canon /cov/ crossovers.
No.214625
Anonymous
>>214624
Shame, it's possibly the most /cov/ shit ever that I could think of as well.
No.214627
Anonymous
>>214625
That and Capcom vs Marvel. It's slim pickings.
No.214628
Anonymous
>>214624
>>214625
I'd chalk it up to the general Disney and Nomura stigma these tournaments have.
No.214630
Anonymous
A randomized bracket of 256 would be kino.