/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Thread stats: 397 posts, 21 files (21 image(s))

Replying to /tnt/224901
Options
No.224901
Mr./Ms. /co/ Off-Season Discussion Thread #21Anonymous
Replies:>>224942
Image:177129296506.png(1.09MB, 736x559)80s.PNG
Saturday morning edition
No.224902
Anonymous
I hope G.I Joe characters qualify this year.
No.224903
Anonymous
Replies:>>224951
>>224902
I can see them getting a boost thanks to the comics and EU getting an adaptation.
Who would make it though?
No.224905
Anonymous
Replies:>>224907
We need to bring in Black Hand more often to start verifying and vetting posts.
No.224907
Anonymous
Replies:>>224911
>>224905
It'd be admitting some faggot no life retard unironically tanked this board's quality single-handedly and most of the blame falls on anon's reactions and boogeymanning about him.
No.224910
Anonymous
Image:177129506974.png(381kB, 1490x886)Screenshot_20260216_211912.png
Yep, he's mad.
No.224911
Anonymous
Replies:>>224964
>>224907
If you have nothing to hide and have done nothing, you wouldn't be afraid to have your post checked.
No.224912
Anonymous
>>224910
Meh, this gets used way too much to dunk on people, I think jannies just got bored of it. We need to switch up our shit posts every once in a while.
No.224918
Anonymous
Replies:>>224921
>>224910
Who is exactly "he" in this situation? What is this from?
No.224921
Anonymous
Replies:>>224923
>>224918
Dunking on one of iCuck's 7,000 bait posts:
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/152506986/#q152512487
No.224923
Anonymous
Replies:>>224924
>>224921
But icuck hates Marvel. Also most of the other posts deleted were blatant troll posts by the other chaosfag. I think you just caught up in the jannies's broom.
No.224924
Anonymous
>>224923
Maybe, lol.
No.224942
Anonymous
Image:177130031197.jpg(4kB, 130x148)Magneto the neato.jpg
>>224901
HOW DARE YOU IGNORE THE MIGHTY AND POWERFUL MAGNETO
No.224951
Anonymous
Replies:>>224958
>>224903
I don't remember any of the heroes being memorable other than the villain
No.224958
Anonymous
Replies:>>224975
>>224951
Snake Eyes?
No.224964
Anonymous
>>224911
>If you have nothing to hide and have done nothing, you wouldn't be afraid to submit your government ID.
No.224975
Anonymous
Replies:>>224976
>>224958
88 TEETH?!
No.224976
Anonymous
>>224975
HAMMERHEAD?!
No.224977
Anonymous
Wouldn't it be funny if Gaslight District, Knights of Guinevere and even Gameoververse started halving support from Circus now that Glitchfags have more to choose from.
No.224981
Anonymous
Replies:>>224984
>Our GODDESS Frankie (and Wuya I guess) is returning to streaming
>Raven already has that Amazon money and Fang is still in WB's good graces
>Duck Dodgers is one of the returning shows
Potential foreshadowing?
No.224982
Anonymous
>>224977
I don't think any of Glitch's upcoming shows scratch that autism itch that TADC does. Maybe Gameoverse will come close. Mel didn't come close to qualifying, but if Gaslight and KoG have their second episodes out by then I can see a few making it in. Mel, Gwen, maybe Frankie?
No.224983
Anonymous
>>224982
Well probably have ADC hard carry Glitch again, especially if the generation wars still happen.
No.224984
Anonymous
>>224981
Frankie, my OBESE all-star...
No.224985
Anonymous
>>224984
She is FIT and HEALTHY from having to carry both Foster's and the tournament on her back.
No.224986
Anonymous
Replies:>>224988
>>224982
Frankie Spanky is absolutely making it in as the highest seeded newcomer.
No.224987
Anonymous
Replies:>>224993
>>224985
NO....NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
No.224988
Anonymous
>>224986
Doubtful, especially when the loli did better in barred.
No.224990
Anonymous
Replies:>>224992
If KoG's second episode drops over the summer and /co/ likes it enough (and they continue to like the show) I can see it playing out like this:
>Gwen
Probably going to be the strongest once more episodes come out. There being multiple Gwens will allow her to check off a lot of boxes for people on top of her already appealing design + whatever conflict 'ours' has with the others could make her an interesting character.
>Olivia
Overall huge missed opportunity. I don't think we're going to see enough of her child self to get her further than round 1.
>Frankie
I admire her fans' devotion but I don't see her going far. Too many people are gonna look at her and hear Dana made her and assume she's a trans lesbian.
>Andi
Ok I don't dislike Andi but nobody talks about her.
Remembering that these characters are working against /co/'s dislike for Dana and attitude that Glitch makes shows for zoomers (even though Dana's a millennial and the show is firmly aimed at adults), I don't see any of them doing well. But if /co/ likes the show well enough I think they could do better than TOH characters at least.
No.224991
Anonymous
>>224977
Murder Drones was a R1 jobber series, and Metarunner AND Sunset Paradise never even qualified
No.224992
Anonymous
>>224990
>Too many people are gonna look at her and hear Dana made her and assume she's a trans lesbian
Wasn't it literally the opposite, she didn't and Bluesky tried to cancel her
No.224993
Anonymous
Replies:>>225082
>>224984
>>224985
>>224987
>Fatfags will never survive Round 1 in Playgirl
>No fatfag will ever qualify again in Playboy
>Cheesecake will never qualify in Ms. /co/
>No fatties will get far in Ms. /aco/
>Vizielard will never win on a main board
>Inflation animation will never get into Tag Team
>Pyrocynical will never be whitelisted onto /v/
>/tv/ tournament will never happen thus Brosnan will stay dead
Read the list fatfags. You will never accomplish anything
No.224994
Anonymous
>>224992
Yeah but not everyone knows that.
No.224996
Anonymous
On a scale of 0.0 (literal who dud) to 10 (MLP) how powerful is TADC?
No.224997
Anonymous
>>224996
7.5 now, 8.5 historically.

You tend to start getting crackdowns and shadow bans if you get much higher. Homestuck was a 9.5 at it's peak and it got soft-banned for years
No.224998
Anonymous
Replies:>>225004
>>224997
I'm really glad that vtubers were never eligible for these because that shit when it first blew up was a 9 at the lowest.
No.224999
Anonymous
>>224996
If we put something like Loud House at a 2-3, MD and Owl House at a 5, and the barrier to overcoming zoomer spite in chan tourneys at a 6, then put SU at a 6.5, I'd give TADC a solid 8.
No.225000
Anonymous
>>224992
Yes, but they got angry to begin with because it's mostly trannies that care about this character.
No.225002
Anonymous
>Kim Possible's VA has cancer.
Fuck and right after James Van Der Beek died.
No.225004
Anonymous
>>224998
Inb4 someone tries to start a /vt/ tournament
No.225005
Anonymous
Replies:>>225006
>>224997
I think it is wild that /co/ has changed so much the past several years that Homestuck General is openly allowed again
No.225006
Anonymous
Replies:>>225007
>>225005
>I think it is wild that /co/ has changed so much the past several years
Generals have always been allowed, you just can't call them that.
No.225007
Anonymous
Replies:>>225008
>>225006
No before a bunch of mods quit Homestuck threads usually got shot down. HS at it's peak was probably second only to mlp in how board encompassing it was.
No.225008
Anonymous
Replies:>>225009
>>225007
Death Battle threads have stayed up for years despite having long since metasized into cancer and are barely even on topic anymore. I think HS fans have skill issue.
No.225009
Anonymous
Replies:>>225010
>>225008
No, it's just that Homestuck threads were deleted left and right because up until The Hack, there was some rogue mod that made sure it was impossible to have any discussion about it.
No.225010
Anonymous
Replies:>>225011
>>225009
So skill issue.
No.225011
Anonymous
Replies:>>225012
>>225010
>off-season tourney threads stopped being deleted at the same time Homestuck General stopped being deleted
HMMMMMMMMMMMM
No.225012
Anonymous
>>225011
Now that's a real thinker.
No.225013
Anonymous
So the guy who hated Homestuck was also the one fucking over tournaments?

Huh.
No.225015
Anonymous
>>225013
Probably wasn't one of the schizos but probably the reason tournaments had to keep rigid rules and why tag team was banished.
No.225016
Anonymous
Well, Tag Team is back, and just in time for it's 8th year and All-Stars.
No.225017
Anonymous
>>225016
Tag Team was unironically better off here.
No.225018
Anonymous
Replies:>>225021
Should we host it on the Anniversary date (December 17th?)
No.225019
Anonymous
Replies:>>225040
Image:177145173150.jpg(60kB, 1171x338)IMG_1567.jpeg
>>225013
Someone did make this post in reply to Temp sharing his IRC logs back when Tag-Team 2023 got banished to /trash/.

https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/53564418/#53565032
No.225021
Anonymous
Replies:>>225026
>>225018
Won't that overlap with King?
No.225026
Anonymous
Replies:>>225029
>>225021
Also (maybe people forgot) there's King m/v/p probably in Jan. Might have to be some major schedule shifting.
No.225029
Anonymous
>>225026
Oh yeah, Christmas is around that time.
No.225038
Anonymous
Replies:>>225048
>>225016
I'd say it was better here considering we don't have to deal with the same ragebaiter all the time (BBC spam, cuck dads, buzzwords and buzzwords) but at least we will have Coayynon and not some random who wanted to turn a shittypost thread into a tournament like Rusty. Maybe by then Samaritanon will also contribute for Tag-team officially back in /co/ and just in time for Tag-team All-Stars. unless it turns out that mod was on vacation and fucks us over when he returns and sees us trying to run Tag-team
No.225039
Anonymous
>tfw ATF was stats anon all this time
No.225040
Anonymous
>>225019
>ATF
>NSA
They aren’t even trying to hide it.

Can you post the logs? I thought Temp never released them
No.225042
Anonymous
Replies:>>225043
Image:177149253143.png(60kB, 811x518)IMG_1572.png
>>225040
They are in the Desuarchive link I posted.
No.225043
Anonymous
Image:177149254936.png(50kB, 876x419)IMG_1571.png
>>225040
>>225042
No.225048
Anonymous
>>225038
Wouldn't that just be funny?
No.225081
Anonymous
Friend inside me
No.225082
Anonymous
>>224993
Fang won tho
No.225089
Anonymous
Replies:>>225108
>>225082
Spear is fatter even as a zombie
No.225102
Anonymous
Kim Possible may be the biggest disparity of performance to expectation there is in tourneys. She's got a super impressive history:
>semifinalist inaugural year and 2020
>E8 2024 (one of the handful of 3x E8)
>only ever lost prior to E8 to Raven (3x E8 and eventual winner) and EVE (2x E8)
Yet she's got no hype and is basically seen as a shoe-in jobber playing third tier to the potential winners of next Ms /co/.
No.225104
Anonymous
Replies:>>225105
>>225102
Kim feels like one of the most normal of the perennial powerhouses. She's hot but not a blatant sexpot, is fairly straightlaced with no crazy personality quirks, and has no real gimmicks or hooks. Even Frankie, who's also fairly normal, has the "cool older girl you had a crush on as a kid" hook. I guess Kim has the "hot and nice overachieving cheerleader" thing, and the secret agent thing is cool, but I don't know how much those things inspire passion for her over other characters with stronger hooks, like Shego, from the same series, who has bad girl appeal.

Not that Kim is bad. I like her and obviously most people do in general, but like her theme song says, she's a basic, average girl... at least in comparison to a lot of the competition. She can stand out among the top but has a harder time standing out among the top of the top. I could see her winning before Shego though.
No.225105
Anonymous
>>225102
>>225104
She lack "aura" is how I'd put it. Chel is in much the same place. They hit the sweetspot demographic and everyone knows them and sort of likes them/their media or cooms to them enough to be universal but they don't inspire champion material sentiment. So they end up the texbook powerjobbers.
No.225108
Anonymous
Replies:>>225131
>>225089
Her supporters are fatfagd
No.225124
Anonymous
>gooseworx melting the fuck down because he got criticized
Lmao
No.225125
Anonymous
>>225124
Unless the ending is really bad this'll blow over by September, and nobody has a problem with Pomni. Jax's dead odds are somehow even deader though.
No.225128
Anonymous
>>225124
>>225125
The guy's specific approach to making a show and managing a fanbase was conducive to that fanbase going batshit insane, not just because the show's direction is very "fandomy" and even downright childish, but also due to the constant public statements about his creative intent.
No.225129
Anonymous
Man does it feel good to like TADC without ever engaging with the fanbase for it, only ever peeking in on /co/ threads because there's a juicy cropped porn OP at most.
No.225130
Anonymous
>>225124
Wow. That is genuinely unexpected coming from the worx.
No.225131
Anonymous
>>225082
>>225108
She's all muscle
No.225132
Anonymous
Replies:>>225133
>>225125
Nothing will ever change where Jax is now. He's created to pander to a demographic that doesn't vote in tournaments (anymore); Goose admitting Jax was his favorite character sealed his fate before it even started.
The only questions I have now are: Will Ragatha's chances be affected next year and will Jax get another scat campaign despite not qualifying?
No.225133
Anonymous
>>225132
>Will Ragatha's chances be affected next year and will Jax get another scat campaign despite not qualifying?
We're not gonna know until we see how Pomni performs this year. Goose effectively shooting herself in the foot and revealing that the show has been a deeply buried under subtext romance all along could sour the show for /co/. But unless Pomni is especially stupid or badly handled in the next episode(s?), I don't think /co/ will really turn on her.
No.225134
Anonymous
When TADC came out I was calling it the autistic digital circus. Little did I know how bad it would get.
No.225135
Anonymous
That's two Glitch shows that have been wrapped up in weird fandom drama. Arin Hanson basically foreshadows a third one happening. Anybody check on Liam?
No.225136
Anonymous
>>225135
>Two shows wrapped in drama
>One just got repeatedly raped in the tourneys
>Arin Hanson involved
This is why zoomers need to stop making things.
No.225137
Anonymous
>>225136
But all of these creators are millennials.
No.225138
Anonymous
Replies:>>225139
>>225135
>>225136
Can we really say KoG is embroiled in drama the way TADC is? The Frankie thing died down after like a week.
No.225139
Anonymous
Replies:>>225140
>>225138
It would be more accurate to say that it's a sign of things to come on the scale of the TADC thing than truly dire. Having the worst aspects of the OH fandom and Glitch autism is not a good mix.
No.225140
Anonymous
Replies:>>225141
>>225139
But we should consider that KoG probably isn't going to have its own Jax (a male character who takes away attention from the female characters and is Dana's self-confessed favorite).
No.225141
Anonymous
>>225140
Dunno, TOH managed to have a Hunter despite not being the favorite so anything is possible.
No.225143
Anonymous
Funnily Jax was probably my favorite character the first few eps. I like that a characters just a psycho asshole in the circumstances. But when he got put in the maid uniform I knew something was up.
No.225144
Anonymous
Pomni getting her own drama (and Jax) just completes the trifecta.

Are there ANY high profile characters going into 2026 without a show drama or character drama or sick actor or something?
No.225145
Anonymous
>>225102
She got the incest falseflagger and is otherwise one of the last silent powerhouses alongside Shego and Helen Parr
No.225146
Anonymous
>>225144
I was gonna say ENA, but then I remembered all the people calling her /v/ adjacent because she's better known for the game now.

I guess Jucika, Eve, and Azula are the cleanest girls with any semblance of power. Out of those three I'd favor Jucika though Azula could easily end her fraud streak with some support
No.225147
Anonymous
>>225146
Jucika seems to have the Joahanna problem of people considering her not worthy, and EVE has the Fang problem of not being humanoid not to mention a robot already won.

Unironically Avatar fans should go all in on Azula, the competition is unusually weakened due to IRL events and good timing and nobody's spite voting her with how much her reputation is in the toilet. With a strong campaign she could make Top 4.
No.225148
Anonymous
>>225147
Azula’s main problem may then be cucking Toph out of the win, who might be seen as the better avatar rep. But tbh I think people have just overrated Azula cause she was filler in an acronym.
No.225149
Anonymous
Image:177180661483.jpg(8kB, 211x239)jetstream sam mind if I cut in.jpg
>>225147
>Azula gets a massive redemption arc and pulls off a win whilst being the only FARTS member in the running
>Toph ends up getting utterly EXPOSED and completely BTFO for all of eternity
funny
No.225150
Anonymous
>>225146
I'm surprised no one is bringing up how all three of Happy ENA's male VAs have been involved in some controversy.
No.225151
Anonymous
Replies:>>225152
>>225144
Tyr has nothing inherently but voters might not be up for a second Duck Dodgers winner so soon.
Might be a very surprising Ms /co/ year if there is no obvious frontrunner since it seems everyone has some flaw.
No.225152
Anonymous
>>225144
>>225147
>>225151
Is a sick actor REALLY considered an IRL flaw to hold against a character? She wasn't even officially diagnosed iirc making this really morbid.
No.225153
Anonymous
>Tyr: Same series curse and super daffy blowback
>Any Adventure Time Girls: Various controversies back to back
>Pomni: Biggest spite target, recent fandom meltdown and controversy
>ENA: Trans allegations, pedo voice actor, /v/ associated now
>Kim: Eternal Curse, Cancer VA, Incestfag
>Eve: a robot already won, a non humanoid already won, NSA ties
>Jucika: Forced allegations and wormyfag
>Azula: Issue of Tophfags fearing she’ll steal the spot


Honestly it’s like the universe itself conspired to do the spiting for us and opened up the playing field. Maybe it’ll be a good year
No.225154
Anonymous
Replies:>>225156
>>225152
/tnt/ has a lot of problems but that kind of shit is the only thing about it that actually upsets me.
No.225155
Anonymous
Replies:>>225162
>>225147
>not being humanoid
>problem
People are lame.
No.225156
Anonymous
Replies:>>225158
>>225152
>>225153
>>225154
Am I crazy for thinking the cancer think isn't gonna have any effect whatsoever and Kim will still lose because it's Kim
No.225157
Anonymous
Replies:>>225163
>>225153
>Eve: NSA ties
Are you daft? The only ties EVE has to NSA is how some guy made funny OC of her mocking the latter.
No.225158
Anonymous
>>225156
No, you aren't.
No.225159
Anonymous
I still think this place is overstimating the blowback Daffy's win will have on Tyr. She's not even really a Looney Tune.
No.225160
Anonymous
Replies:>>225164
>>225153
Just saying again Jessica Rabbit and Tinkerbell feel like massive latent potential that'll get superbuffed if they finally crack E8.
No.225162
Anonymous
Replies:>>225169
>>225155
Fang unironically mindbroke people.
No.225163
Anonymous
>>225157
He's using "cancer va" as an example of "the playing field being evened out". It's beyond daft.
No.225164
Anonymous
>>225160
Having the Disney label attached is a bigger spite curse than all of those combined
No.225165
Anonymous
Replies:>>225182
>>225164
Kronk won and Jessica is barely even a Disney character.
No.225167
Anonymous
>>225153
I don't think any of this stuff really matters. It might decide close matches because out of a thousand voters you can always find at least a few dozen retards who care about such things, but on the whole this stuff is fairly irrelevant. No one who isn't spending the leading 51 weeks of a 1 week event scrutinizing every possibly relevant current event will care.
>Maybe it’ll be a good year
This implies that these overblown controversies are desirable and that these characters having less of a chance somehow makes the tournament good, or at least better than them performing as expected. I disagree with that sentiment. There's no inherent superiority to a dark horse victory beyond trying to force a narrative across multiple tournaments, least of all because the competition got bogged down with forced nonsense that will taint discussion about them. We should be doing less of that stuff, not more.
No.225168
Anonymous
Replies:>>225170
>>225164
There's "Good Old Disney" and there's "Shitty New Disney". Kronk and Nani are right at the border of the cutoff and the former won while the latter has gotten repeat E8s, the most recent just last year. The animosity toward the mouse as a brand doesn't really extend to the stuff they've made that people actually like.
No.225169
Anonymous
>>225162
People still rage about her to this very day. I can’t imagine being angry at a fictional character over something as retarded as a 4chan tourney.
No.225170
Anonymous
Replies:>>225171
>>225168
>Shitty New Disney
When both the movies premiered, they were consider in the era of Shitry New Disney.
No.225171
Anonymous
Replies:>>225173
>>225170
They were post-Renaissance, but not TRULY shit. Not yet. They were getting there but still had momentum left for stuff like these two movies, Treasure Planet, and Atlantis. This was when the creative engine was petering out but there was still decent creative output among some misses, even if not all of it made money. The utter drought of anything memorable probably started in 2003. This is why I say Emperor's New Groove and Lilo & Stitch are on the borderline. I don't think Disney truly crossed fully over into shit until Home on the Range in 2004.
No.225173
Anonymous
Replies:>>225174
>>225171
Emperor's New Groove was not considered highly at the time of its release, especially with people being more aware of Kingdom of the Sun, with it only getting critical appraisal years later and even then KotS still weighs heavily on people's minds. And if the anti Stitchfag is of any indication, people do consider that film to be a low point.
No.225174
Anonymous
Replies:>>225176
>>225173
Should make it clear that I'm not trying to shit on these films or their characters. The point I was not so greatly trying to make is that public perception does change over time and different eras scale differently. If these were held ten or even twenty years ago, the results and opinions would be wildly different.
No.225175
Anonymous
So yeah nobody is spitevoting Jessica Rabbit or Tinkerbell for being Disney, especially in the case of the former.
No.225176
Anonymous
>>225174
>If these were held ten or even twenty years ago, the results and opinions would be wildly different.
We're almost ten years going at this point. It's kinda peculiar just how few powerhouses the zoomer era has produced. Almost all of them are late 90's/2000's core. Spinel carries a major rigger fotm caveat and Fang is Genndy wank so only TADC legit feels like a newer era toon that did big in tourneys on its own traction. But I'm certain characters like Raven, Toph, Hank ect would've been as well performing as are currently twenty years ago.
No.225177
Anonymous
Replies:>>225179
>>225176
>Primal not getting its own traction
>it was only Genndy bro, trust
Which is why UWE bombed out harder than drones?
So many times anons here will be close to making a point and then end up tripping over their own biases and or delusions along the way.
No.225179
Anonymous
Replies:>>225180
>>225177
The distinction wasn't really in the part about getting its own traction but from being a "newer era toon." Genndy is honorary millenial core. Regardless the point is much the same, zoomer toons have been comparatively dimeless in tourneys ten years running now.
No.225180
Anonymous
>>225179
Is it necessary to put "honorary" here when the point you are making is that it's mostly millennials who watch him.
No.225181
Anonymous
>>225180
I hate how we're back on that honorary millennial core bullshit regarding Fang. It just ends up giving Gen Z era toons a bigger complex when we already have a new era winner.
No.225182
Anonymous
Replies:>>225184
>>225165
2019 was the last early installment year before meta and consistent participation was solidified. Kronk was a different era entirely of voters who were more receptive for voting mainline Disney, and that and Pixar struggle harder than acquisitions like Muppets, Star Wars, and Marvel do that are less attached to the parent company and almost seen as screwed by them.
Note Kronk was the last Disney E8 in Mr until Goofy last year, meanwhile Daffy made E8 3x during that span. Many characters alone 2-3x the amount of E8s Disney had this decade.
No.225183
Anonymous
>>225180
Sure whatever. There’s always too much nitpicking about fucking Fang. Point is the same.
No.225184
Anonymous
>>225182
All this tells me is that the tournaments are very biased towards Looney Tunes.
No.225185
Anonymous
Replies:>>225186
>>225184
Do you really believe it is controversial to say classic Looney Tunes are generally funnier and better cartoons than a lot of Disney? Or at least, more visibly appealing to the /co/ voterbase, even classic Disney is comparatively girly in comparison.
And I think Donald and Scrooge should have made E8 a while ago already, by the way.
No.225186
Anonymous
Replies:>>225190
>>225185
>even classic Disney is comparatively girly in comparison.
How is that a problem when /co/ is one of the girliest boards outside of /mlp/ (which is helped spawn)?
No.225187
Anonymous
Replies:>>225189
>>225184
Eh, Samurai Jack and Hank also 3x during that period (if you include 2019 Hank 4x) and Spongebob had 5 Elite 8s including multiple 2x. Number of others had 2x as well
They just seem to hit that sweet spot of notable early 2000s /co/ media nostalgia more than Disney did, outside TENG. Same reason in Ms the only Disney characters who ever got anywhere are from Kim Possible & Lilo and Stitch
No.225188
Anonymous
Truth be told is that if mainline Disney doesn't perform too well in these tournaments (all while still having a winners and E8s), it has more to do with demographic appeal/a matter of taste and a lot less than with corpo fighting.
No.225189
Anonymous
>>225187
Well as mentioned, Disney wasn't in the best place in the first half of the 2000s so it makes sense. I'm honestly surprised that John Silver gained any kind of notoriety while Atlantis still gets nothing.
No.225190
Anonymous
Replies:>>225191
>>225186
You are just describing nerds with a porn addiction. That's like asking why so-called otaku moefags and lolicons care about K-On and Popotan but don't tend to have the same fixation on mahou shoujou and josei stuff.
No.225191
Anonymous
Replies:>>225192
>>225190
You have a point with josei for the same reason most seinen wouldn't do well but mahou shojo are staples of otaku.
No.225192
Anonymous
Replies:>>225193
>>225191
All of these are otaku staples in one way or other, they just appeal to different demographics. If you are thinking of examples like PMMM or Alien Nine, they appeal to lolicons because they were made by and for lolicons.
No.225193
Anonymous
>>225192
Actually I was thinking in terms of the Sentai types like Sailor Moon and Pretty Cure but you make a good point about different demographics.
No.225194
Anonymous
Replies:>>225197
>>225176
>It's kinda peculiar just how few powerhouses the zoomer era has produced.
Not that peculiar when old good new bad has been around for decades; if anyone remembers how the Avatar and its fans were regarded in the day, Toph for sure wouldn't be doing as well. Marceline is already showing subtle shifts in demographic changes.
What's strange to me is how the rest of the 90s doesn't do better given how that era as a whole is praised to hell and back.
No.225195
Anonymous
>>225189
Atlantis is perplexing, it has everything you would think /co/ would like
>Early 2000s production
>Failure, so it has huge cult following cred and Disney distancing from it
>Very non-disney style and worldbuilding
>Very man-targeted action/adventure
And yet
>Milo qualifies exactly once, in 2018 with all the odd one-offs
>Kida never qualifies
I would have thought Milo and Kida would at least have been Round 1 jobber regulars
No.225196
Anonymous
>>225189
>I'm honestly surprised that John Silver gained any kind of notoriety while Atlantis still gets nothing.
Treasure Planet is one of the few animated Disney films made with a male viewership in mind and is fondly remembered despite bombing and being not-so-faithful to the book + Silver is associated with an infamous /co/ thread and other related memes
and last but not least because Silver had someone actually trying, I don't think I have ever seen anyone campaign for Atlantis.
No.225197
Anonymous
>>225194
I don't think Marceline is truly indicative of anything when she was shy of making E8 as early as 2018. Hell, it will soon be a decade since the first iteration of AT officially ENDED. This "vibe shift" should have already taken place and as a zoom zoom who grew up watching AT it's been years since I last cared about it.
>if anyone remembers how the Avatar and its fans were regarded in the day
Do you really want to put this premise forward when TADC is right there?
No.225199
Anonymous
Replies:>>225201
>>225197
Do you not understand "in the day" zoom zoom?
No.225200
Anonymous
>Gen Z are the ones pushing the generation shitflinging in the tournaments
That's a shocker.
No.225201
Anonymous
Replies:>>225202
>>225199
And do you understand that an equally popular and annoying fanbase hasn't deterred the series in question fron doing well?
No.225202
Anonymous
>>225197
>>225201
Do you really want to put this premise forward when Owl House and Murder Drones are also right there?
No.225203
Anonymous
Replies:>>225205
>>225202
I just don't cope about it and admit those simply aren't popular and /co/ in general doesn't like them.
No.225204
Anonymous
>>225202
Murder Drones is a niche series that pulls way above its weight in performance by just qualifying
Owl House is hated for being a poor written series, not the fandom
No.225205
Anonymous
>>225203
I'll give you that /co/ doesn't like them but saying they aren't popular sounds like cope itself.
No.225206
Anonymous
>>225197
>This "vibe shift" should have already taken place
The rule of nostalgia is usually 20 years. This is why a hypothetical 2006 was brought up; the demographics were so vastly different that there's no guarantee that Avatar would do good in a tournament back then. To put it in perspective, comics would legitimately give cartoons competition.

Bringing up a present day cartoon to prove that Avatar would always do good misses the point.
No.225207
Anonymous
>>225206
Yeah, sure, whatever, yadda yadda… but Avatar didn’t need 20 years to start doing well.
I think all of this is just a cope because some millennial loretoon fans here really want their shows to do well eventually and be vindicated as Legiti Good, when the audience is just not really there.
If TADC doesn't need to wait 20 years, then why stuff like OH or Amphibia does?
No.225208
Anonymous
Replies:>>225209
>>225207
>I think all of this is just a cope because some millennial loretoon fans
I thought it was the zoomers, now it's a millennial thing?
No.225209
Anonymous
Replies:>>225211
>>225208
Think about it for a second, why would the zoomers be the ones hoping for a demographic shift when they are the shift in question?
No.225210
Anonymous
Replies:>>225215
>>225207
>but Avatar didn’t need 20 years to start doing well.
Can you really say Avatar as a whole does well when it's just Toph and even then she's had dry spells? None of the Avatar guys do good and Azula was outed as a fraud. TADC has a better track record ATLA.
No.225211
Anonymous
Replies:>>225212
>>225209
…Because zoomer shows are the ones that do the worst you fucking retard. Millennial shows are the 90s and 2000s shows that dominate.
No.225212
Anonymous
Replies:>>225214
>>225211
Have you considered for a moment a majority of /co/ zoomers just don't indulge in those zoomer shows?
No.225213
Anonymous
Replies:>>225216
I've seen we've reached the "if you're pick doesn't do well in this random contest, it's not popular or well liked" stage of tourney discussion.
No.225214
Anonymous
>>225212
Now this is beyond cope.
No.225215
Anonymous
Replies:>>225217
>>225210
Top has x3 E8, Azula and Uncle Iroh are x1 E8 but otherwise midcards, and other characters like Zuko almost always qualify but aren’t really seen as winner material. That's far from "a worse track record than TADC", but then again I wasn't the one brought the Avatar connection to the table.
No.225216
Anonymous
>>225213
>if you're
But yes, these are popularity contests first and foremost. If many of these characters cannot do well despite being subjected to a lot of meta discussion it probably has a lot to do with not being generally well received on the board.
No.225217
Anonymous
Image:177186063279.jpg(579kB, 1061x4530)image0.JPG
>>225215
Technically someone else brought up TADC when Avatar was brought up. Avatar was used example as an example of "things people liked now were hated back in the day" and it somehow spiraled into this.
No.225218
Anonymous
>>225216
>I see you made a grammar error there
I fucking hate zoom zooms.

Also these stopped being popularity contests a long time ago and are just tourneyfag circlejerks. There are well liked series and characters that don't well because something like meta even exists.
No.225219
Anonymous
Replies:>>225220
>>225218
So you admit it's mostly millennials who like these shows the ones going on about a supposed demographic shift on /co/?
No.225220
Anonymous
Replies:>>225222
>>225219
How the fuck did you glean that from the post?
No.225221
Anonymous
Replies:>>225224
>>225216
>>225218
Attitudes like this are why less and less people want to be involved with tournaments btw.
No.225222
Anonymous
Replies:>>225223
>>225220
>I fucking hate zoom zooms
Hm!
No.225223
Anonymous
>>225222
That's a big leap in logic.
No.225224
Anonymous
Replies:>>225225
>>225221
Man, is it really so much to ask for some tourneyfags to stop coping about the reason why some of their series don't do as well as they wish they did?
No.225225
Anonymous
>>225224
It's tourneyfags like you that scare off the natives of the board actually. This was demonstrably proven with Capeshit after cap.
No.225226
Anonymous
>>225225
>the reason zoomer toons don't do well is cuz board natives have been driven away from the tourneys
Please, just stick to a concrete narrative already.
No.225227
Anonymous
>>225226
You realize that more than one person is talking to you, right?
No.225228
Anonymous
Replies:>>225243
If millennials supposedly like shit like Owl House and Amphibia then what the fuck even counts as zoomer toons at this point?
No.225229
Anonymous
Replies:>>225230
>>225226
I mean that seems pretty concrete? If your favorite shows get a hostile reaction from other voters and campaigners and people try to demoralize you, no shit they would rather just stick to their generals. I think TADC is the rare exception due to being able to match tourney autism tit for tat.
No.225230
Anonymous
Replies:>>225231
>>225229
Where have I attempted to demoralize anyone? If anything, being honest about the reception towards something is better than making up a fantasy where a series finding success in the tournaments is just a matter of time and hoping the userbase changes.
No.225231
Anonymous
Replies:>>225233
>>225230
>Where have I attempted to demoralize anyone?
I was talking about in the actual tournaments and how people are poor sports. Jesus Christ dude no one was pointing any fingers at you, get a grip.
No.225232
Anonymous
Replies:>>225233
Image:177186521758.jpg(165kB, 1200x489)prequel trilogy.jpg
>opinions don't change over time and reception doesn't improve as years go by, that's just tourney cope
I don't even like most new cartoons but come on now.
No.225233
Anonymous
>>225231
>no one was pointing any fingers at you
>>225225
>It's tourneyfags like you
Meh.

>>225232
I don't necessarily disagree with this, but my point is that the demographic shift already took place and I don't see people changing their tune on loretoons. Some of you guys have been parroting this since late 2023, geez.
No.225234
Anonymous
>>225233
>Meh.
That was my post and that wasn't aimed at you specifically but shit attitudes like yours are a problem in bringing down the atmosphere.
No.225235
Anonymous
Replies:>>225238
>>225233
>>225234
The shit I was talking about is stuff like how Amity and her campaigner were getting trashed by that one Enidfag. Don't know what you two are referencing but if you're not doing that, okay.
No.225236
Anonymous
Replies:>>225239
>>225234
Quit acting so defensive over me calling unpopular shows /co/ doesn't really like for what they are. I haven't even said they are terrible or whatever, but this is not a hug box either way.
No.225237
Anonymous
Replies:>>225241
>>225233
>geez
Ech. Also a loretoon already won the second ms. If you're talking about Amphibia and Owl House then the shift hasn't happened yet; neither are even a decade old yet and are still considered the new thing that's cool to hate on.
No.225238
Anonymous
Replies:>>225240
>>225235
Trashing specific people over harmlessly expressing support for something (no matter to what extent you may think it's shitty or loathsome) is wrong, of course. That's not the same as stating "this doesn't do well because most people don't it like and that's not magically gonna change" in a conversation about why these cartoons don't do well, for the umpteenth time.
No.225239
Anonymous
>>225236
You're the only one acting defensive over people disagreeing with you. If this isn't a hug box, you wouldn't have a stick up your ass over differing opinions.
No.225240
Anonymous
Replies:>>225248
Image:177186714700.jpg(104kB, 975x969)it do be like mr. Caine.JPG
>>225238
lol he's seething over the though of shows he dislikes possibly doing good
No.225241
Anonymous
>>225237
>neither are even a decade old yet and are still considered the new thing that's cool to hate on
See, my problem is how some of you guys seem delusional about this and are fully convinced Amphibia and Owl House fail because of contrarianism and there not being enough zoomers/alphoomers (?) voting, not because they are just organically unpopular next to TADC or ENA.
No.225242
Anonymous
Image:177186727668.jpg(87kB, 2048x1145)sad Rex.JPG
Guess I shouldn't support Rex anymore since he's unpopular by tourney rules and nothing will change that.
No.225243
Anonymous
Replies:>>225245
Image:177186731230.jpg(14kB, 750x528)1762834753127866.jpg
>>225228
The oldest zoomers are turning 30 soon, so that means any cartoon made after '96 is zoomerslop. That means the only pure winners are Betty, Raven, Spider-Man, Tom, Daffy, Zorak and Skeletor.
No.225244
Anonymous
Replies:>>225252
>>225241
>ENA
See this is where you are delusional. ENA is nowhere popular as any DTVA slop, let alone TADC; in fact, I see ENA more in tournaments than I do on the board. That's what I would use to show that the tournaments aren't completely in tune with their board.
No.225245
Anonymous
Replies:>>225246
>>225243
You are the delusional "you guys" being talked about.
No.225246
Anonymous
Replies:>>225247
>>225245
Anon I was joking lol. The point is everyone has their own idea of what a zoomer show is that probably doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
No.225247
Anonymous
Replies:>>225249
>>225246
>It was just a joke bro.
No.225248
Anonymous
Replies:>>225251
>>225240
Not really, but it is kinda sad to see the same cope get repeated over and over again.
It's one thing to admit the characters you support are not popular enough but you will still keep at it, it's another to insist "hehe, just you guys wait until people who were young when these were airing start voting" (they already do). It's giving smug Murder Drones fags, and people here used to mock the shit out of them.
No.225249
Anonymous
>>225247
Yes? Did you really think anyone using a picture of Dale Gribble arguing that the only good winners are from 30+ years ago was being sincere?
No.225251
Anonymous
Replies:>>225256
Image:177186823200.jpg(73kB, 435x563)notimpressed.jpg
>>225248
>smug Murder Drones fags
How is is anything like that when people are just discussing a hypothetical and want them to do incrementally better? It's more sad to see someone this get bent out of shape over discussion you yourself state may ever happen.
No.225252
Anonymous
>>225244
>ENA is nowhere popular as any DTVA slop
Really? It for sure is not as ubiquitous as TADC's "one bump limit thread per day" traction, but /co/ has talked about it plenty and I see the character brought up frequently, be it through reaction images or fanart.
>>225249
Half this thread has descended into turning the opposition into a strawman for some reason.
No.225253
Anonymous
Replies:>>225254
>>225249
Did you think your cope is any effective?
No.225254
Anonymous
Replies:>>225259
>>225253
My cope for what? I don't have any problem with newer cartoons doing well in the tourneys.
No.225255
Anonymous
Replies:>>225258
>>225252
The dude you're replying to is the one turning the opposition into a strawman.
No.225256
Anonymous
Replies:>>225263
>>225251
> just discussing a hypothetical and want them to do incrementally better?
Because I don't believe the premise the hypothetical is based upon is accurate to begin with. These shows don't perform badly because of "new thing BAD, old thing GOOD" psychosis,
Once again, if TADC can do it, why not these?
No.225257
Anonymous
>>225252
I legitimately see Disney shit get posted more. I didn't even know who she was before the tournaments and can honestly say this things introduced me to something new.
No.225258
Anonymous
Replies:>>225260
>>225255
I was genuinely just joking and trying to make fun of how there's no solid definition of a zoomer cartoon. It's fine if you didn't find it funny.
No.225259
Anonymous
Replies:>>225262
>>225254
Newer cartoons don't do good. That is the cope.
No.225260
Anonymous
Replies:>>225261
>>225258
It wasn't accurate to begin with.
No.225261
Anonymous
>>225260
Yes, that's the joke I was making.
No.225262
Anonymous
>>225259
Yeah they don't. I also don't mind if they do well.
No.225263
Anonymous
Image:177186891595.jpg(39kB, 645x698)gangle.JPG
>>225256
I fully admit TADC is lightning in the bottle and a major exception to the rule. I've also seen enough shit thrown TADC's way to know that there absolutely is a bias towards newer things regardless of the perceived writing qualities. To write it off as just a psychosis is just bad faith arguing and yes, just comes off as trying to demoralize people.
But hey, let's stop talking about that tired point and doom about Pomni for the hundredth time.
No.225265
Anonymous
>>225206
There was a cartoon tournament in 2017 we could use as compariwson
No.225268
Anonymous
Replies:>>225269
You all smell that? I just farted.
No.225269
Anonymous
No.225270
Anonymous
>>225204
>qualifying and then getting stomped by low seeds is “pulling above their weight”
So over the years MD went from “inevitable high tier performers” to “well they qualified, that’s impressive!” and now they don’t qualify at all.
/tnt/ just can’t help itself but to revise history and cope can it?
This place will call consistent high tiers jobbers and then say this shit. If we are praising merely qualifying now then we should never make fun of a performance ever again. And I know that this praise only applies to series said anon likes, just pointing out the double standard.
No.225271
Anonymous
>>225204
>Murder Drones is a niche series that pulls way above its weight in performance by just qualifying
Cause it's technically indie while OH was Disney backed? It got even more millions of YT views than OH, was super popular for a series on /co/ to the point it needed its own board on the off-site, plus getting more tourney OC and fandom self-hyping than probably any series ever. This is some major copium.
No.225272
Anonymous
Replies:>>225273
>losing to lapis in a 60/40 landslide is pulling above their weight now
No.225273
Anonymous
>>225270
>>225271
>>225272
Someone post the greentext screencap, the one with the Nfag gloating.
No.225274
Anonymous
>>225271
Also MD absolutely did get hate for fandom, especially in a tourney context. Remember all the seethe and arguing in 23/24 over them basically having too much presence/ovrestaying or generally just being annoying and shit? Arguing about MD would take over entire off-season threads lol.
No.225276
Anonymous
>>225241
Biggest odd indicator to me is the disparity with how Gravity Falls and Star Vs (before the finale) were received board-wide vs. Amphibia and Owl House. Like the former two are the same beansart style, humor, people, studio, even arguably continuity as the latter two and not really better shows quality-wise yet got a far fairer overall treatment from the board, had better early tourney performances, and don't get derogatorily lumped in automatically as "DTVA." You can't really say it's a quirky fem protag thing either cause Star was that. Maybe the gayness of OH was too much especially for when it came out but Amphibia at least is as good as the best of GF and Star, but even at it's very peak and with heavy campaigning it somehow got bodied in tourneys (Anne fucking R1 loss to Peppermint Patty in 2022 lmao). To me there's just a major shift in how newer zoomer media, especially from the mouse, is perceived once the twitter screencap political brainrot era fully took over.
No.225277
Anonymous
Replies:>>225278
>>225274
I think MDfags staying to circlejerk long after they got wiped out absolutely played a role in their performance from then on. Anons are far less likely to give something new a chance when the fans keep circlejerking themselves for like four rounds after they lost. And then anyone who tried to tell them this was labeled a poopdickschizo so they learned nothing.
No.225278
Anonymous
>>225274
>>225277
It’s been fascinating to watch the evolution of their coping. Anything to avoid taking responsibility for their behavior. Much easier to blame everything on an imaginary schizo then to actually accept fault.
No.225279
Anonymous
Replies:>>225280
>>225270
If MD performances is "pulling above their weight" then Jucika must be on some dbs powerlevel compared to everyone else.
No.225280
Anonymous
Replies:>>225283
>>225279
2022 Fang is every single higher power combined.
No.225281
Anonymous
>>225241
People forget the simplest aspect:
These are largely still waifu tournaments with some extra meta. Normal people are repulsed at the idea of sexualizing children to not vote for them, and many are annoyed with how obnoxious the vocal minority of lolifags on the board are. TADC, Marcelene, etc are adults so face no barrier there
>But Toph
Besides the nostalgiafag legacy there is a reason she gets blown out by characters like Raven
No.225282
Anonymous
>>225281
Pomni is some midget noodly looking clown girl tho.
No.225283
Anonymous
Replies:>>225284
>>225280
Fang is from a corpo studio and a 2000's legendary director so it's actually not that impressive. Jucika is from an obscure magazine, a comic strip, from Hungaria, sixty years ago, and was only fairly recently unearthed and gained a cult following in /co/. Not only is she not just an R1 jobber but is a 2x E8 and finalist who beat bitches like Tyr'ahnee Kim Possible. p4p the stronkest character in /co/ ever and it's not even close.
No.225284
Anonymous
Replies:>>225285
>>225283
>a literal dinosaur who’s worst performance was 3rd place and dominated even other massive powerhouses isn’t impressive
No.225285
Anonymous
>>225284
Anon I don't think you're following the joke.
No.225287
Anonymous
Personally I never saw Fang being a dino as a debuff. It actually encouraged the hype cause of novelty/meme/anit-coom/subversion.
No.225288
Anonymous
>>225287
>anti-coom
Have you seen her biggest supporters?
No.225289
Anonymous
Replies:>>225291
>Accidentally sparked a huge argument
I was pretty much just trying to counter the argument this was purely a Pomni Vs Ty’ranhee year and that Tyr was fucked over.

We’ve got like 9 girls who could be considered powerhouses and most of them have some sort of crap going on that anons can fling around. Calm down about the fear mongering
No.225291
Anonymous
>>225289
>Calm down about the fear mongering
The shit that anons can fling at the girls IS fearmongering and was pretty much debunked as baseless as one anon pointed out. That isn’t even what sparked the argument wth.
No.225293
Anonymous
Replies:>>225295
>>225288
Speaking of talking points that have been done to death, he's just trotting out the same complaints people have had about Fang since 2022.
No.225294
Anonymous
Replies:>>225295
>>225288
You fags keep flip flopping on Fang being coom or not.
No.225295
Anonymous
Replies:>>225298
>>225294
Multiple anons say different things from one another? Woah.
>>225293
Will people ever get over her? The got their way in all stars and kept freaking out about her after that.
No.225296
Anonymous
>>225276
Thank you, this is a far more nuanced take I was looking for as to why these shows in particular don't seem to have taken off in the tourneys.
No.225298
Anonymous
>>225295
>Multiple anons say different things from one another?
I mean it's an annoying point of discussion from Fang supporters over the years cause whether or not she had coomvote behind her seems to become dependent on what's being argued. She was an anti-coom vote? No she totally had tons of dinolust behind her, look at the threads. She was a coom vote then? No it was totally ironic/not real, you're retarded for thinking that.
I think, practically speaking, she was obviously not a coom vote outside of mostly irony and had feral dino novelty in a "waifu tournament" driving her hype a lot. I don't think it's ever been a big leap to admit that.
No.225299
Anonymous
>>225298
I haven't really seen her supporters say it was all ironic.
No.225300
Anonymous
>>225298
>fang was all ironic!
You ever notice that the people who say that aren’t fang supporters, but people like (you)? What you’re doing amounts to calling someone a hypocrite because someone who disagrees with them said something that doesn’t align with the original person. To put it in simple terms for you
Fang supporter:
>I legitimately love her show and her character
Anti Fang:
>All the support is ironic
You:
>Those don’t align, make up your minds fangfags!

I shouldn’t be surprised, you guys have been crying about her for almost four years now. Six if you started in 2020.
No.225301
Anonymous
Replies:>>225303
>>225300
It's talking about Fang being coom, anon. You're saying Fang was in fact a sexo pick from her legit fans standpoint then?
Also irony and support for show and character in themselves is a different thing and I'd never deny she is mainly driven because Primal is huge and loved and the character is seen as cool and compelling. Of course Fang has legit support. But I'd always say that there was a strong element of irony hype that went beyond the core fans which feels obvious and even bringing that up sends things into a spiral. The initial spark was simply stating being a dino wasn't really a debuff in meta context >>225287
No.225302
Anonymous
Replies:>>225305
I just wish EVE wasn't caught up in the Fang drama. Every time she loses in the tournament you have someone going "Ha ha anti coomers btfo!"
No.225303
Anonymous
Replies:>>225307
>>225301
>But I'd always say that there was a strong element of irony hype that went beyond the core fans which feels obvious and even bringing that up sends things into a spiral.
From where I stand, it comes off as a backhanded way to downplay her genuine supporters which they don't take kindly to, not helped by Fang is the only one that gets this. Like was it really necessary to add all that stuff after debuff?
No.225304
Anonymous
Replies:>>225306
>>225276
>>225281
>millennial cope
>>225300
>fangfag cope
No.225305
Anonymous
>>225302
It's worth pointing out EVE never got lumped with these things up until 2023.
No.225306
Anonymous
>>225304
>2020 plus 6
>still crying that epic loli got BTFOd by based dinosaur mom
No.225307
Anonymous
Replies:>>225311
>>225303
>it comes off as a backhanded way to downplay her genuine supporters
Whatevs anon. Imagine if you were one of the Spinel or Wuya supporters instead.
>Like was it really necessary to add all that stuff after debuff?
To explain why yes.
No.225308
Anonymous
Replies:>>225318
>>225305
Can you blame them for being paranoid after 2023?
No.225309
Anonymous
Replies:>>225312
No.225310
Anonymous
>>225306
Whatevs anon. You couldn't stop traditional waifus from winning and you never will.
No.225311
Anonymous
Replies:>>225322
>>225307
>Whatevs anon. Imagine if you were one of the Spinel or Wuya supporters instead.
The hell does that have to do anything?
>To explain why yes.
The dinosaur debuff not being a debuff gets the point across. Again it comes across as a backhanded way of saying she is just a ironic, anti coomer novelty winner.
No.225312
Anonymous
Replies:>>225315
I get autism is a hell of a drug, but I cannot figure out how people can hold grudges against characters and their shows because of things that happen in 4chan popularity contests. It absolutely shouldn’t mean the world to you for a fictional character to win a poll that I doubt most votes are legitimate. It’s one thing to meme but when it proceeds into actual obsession and derangement there’s an issue.
>>225309
Have you tried finding a non tourney hobby? It might actually help you be a better person.
No.225313
Anonymous
>225306
Amphibia lost.
Owl House lost.
Knights of Guinevere will lose.
No.225314
Anonymous
Replies:>>225323
>>225310
Oh hey you’re that guy! You gotta stop being so obvious. Try keeping that mask on next time.
Wafflespancakestweet.jpg.
No.225315
Anonymous
Replies:>>225317
>>225312
>unironically going "We must be better men".
No.225316
Anonymous
Replies:>>225323
>>225313
>>225310
>responding with unrelated bullshit
I cannot believe you people are mindbroken this badly.
No.225317
Anonymous
>>225315
If you’re still angry about things like spinel almost a decade later you have an issue
No.225318
Anonymous
Replies:>>225328
>>225308
EVE had already been a decent performer before, anon.
Not to mention if you actually grew up in the 2010s Internet, seeing waifu and/or gijinka fanart of EVE was far from a rarity. There's nothing ironic about liking her.
No.225319
Anonymous
Replies:>>225323
>make statement
>people make counterpoints
>devolves into sperging about people hating traditional waifus almost immediately
Over and over again forever.
No.225320
Anonymous
>>225313
I don’t like any of those things anon. Try harder next time.
No.225322
Anonymous
>>225311
>The hell does that have to do anything?
You complaining when critiques can be far worse. Everyone gets scrutiny in tourneys.
>The dinosaur debuff not being a debuff gets the point across
Does it really.
>just a ironic, anti coomer novelty winner.
I always avoid total language. I said encouraged the hype.
This >>225310 is the residential strawman nigger imitating me and pissing on the conversation btw.
No.225323
Anonymous
>>225322
It's another fangnigger deliberately trying to piss on the conversation
>>225314
>>225316
>>225319
All within a minute of each other
Imitation is not the sincerest form of flattery
No.225324
Anonymous
Replies:>>225329
>>225322
>you should put up with unfair criticism because it can be worse
>Fang winner is on par with actual rigged winners
Seriously?
No.225325
Anonymous
I’d be surprised if more than 50% of tourney votes in recent years are legit. Traffic keeps slowing but vote counts keep rising to more absurd levels.
No.225326
Anonymous
I don't think I've ever seen Jenny, Raven or Frankie get much in the way of criticism. Even the worst Betty has gotten was just being called bland.
No.225327
Anonymous
Replies:>>225346
>the residential shit stirrer is part of the Fang Gang
That was a turn I didn't see.
No.225328
Anonymous
Replies:>>225332
>>225318
>seeing waifu and/or gijinka fanart of EVE was far from a rarity
That wasn't the form that competed in tournaments, was it?
No.225329
Anonymous
>>225324
I think the criticism is fair. It's not even a MAJOR criticism it just gets taken horribly every time, though i can get why cause there's the other autist(s) who won't stop stirring shit with her hardcore.
>on par with
No I'm proposing worse cases of genuine fans having some critique leveled at their winners (I for example legit supported Wuya for a while). You all never can stop with phrasing things as absolute offense/defense in your mind. To me Fang always seems like a super sore point and no ground wants to be given on anything.
No.225331
Anonymous
>>225329
>though i can get why cause there's the other autist(s) who won't stop stirring shit with her hardcore.
This is something her supporters do all the time; just look a what they do with Toph every time she gets brought up. When they have to create strawmen every time someone brings up completely fair criticism, you have to wonder who's really the mindbroken ones.
No.225332
Anonymous
Replies:>>225333
>>225328
Because people do find the robot design cute in its own right, yes.
No.225333
Anonymous
Replies:>>225334
>>225332
Do they really? Think about this anon.
No.225334
Anonymous
Replies:>>225336
>>225333
Oh piss off already, strawmanning faggot.
No.225335
Anonymous
I'm starting to think NSA wasn't the only tourist bitching about Amaterasu the past few years.
No.225336
Anonymous
Replies:>>225337
>>225334
>makes a statement
>someone offers counterpoints and an argument
>"strawman"
Not how this works.
No.225337
Anonymous
Replies:>>225338
>>225336
The counterpoint in question being:
>it just isn't, okay?
No.225338
Anonymous
Replies:>>225339
>>225337
Much like with Fang, EVE's supporters have yet to actually disprove the hype allegations, never mind it isn't even that harsh of a criticism.
No.225339
Anonymous
Replies:>>225341
>>225338
…Did you just have a stroke making this post?
No.225340
Anonymous
Image:177189196280.gif(686kB, 498x280)Smiling Toph Beifong.GIF
She may have lost the battle, but she won her war in the end.
No.225341
Anonymous
>>225339
I'm sorry you can't read.
No.225342
Anonymous
Replies:>>225343
Literally all of this could have been avoided if you all had just let Chel face off against Fang in 2022. The one thing.
No.225343
Anonymous
Image:177189249651.jpg(177kB, 1128x1128)she’s aiming at chel.JPG
>>225342
Proclaim the score Chelfags.
No.225344
Anonymous
Replies:>>225351
>>225329
I mean it's ironic that you complain about absolutes but then put a "you all" in there.
No.225345
Anonymous
>>225322
>Does it really.
Yes.
>I always avoid total language. I said encouraged the hype.
This is backpedaling.
No.225346
Anonymous
>>225327
>the one biggest critic of Fang turned out to be a Wuyafag
That was a turn I didn't see coming
No.225348
Anonymous
Replies:>>225349
>the residential shit stirrer is the grass glenn campaigner
Hehe! what a predicament
No.225349
Anonymous
>>225348
>what a quagmire
FTFY
No.225350
Anonymous
Fang and EVE's fans got real quiet after the diss track dropped.
No.225351
Anonymous
Replies:>>225352
>>225344
My experience with retardation on /tnt/ is absolute.
No.225352
Anonymous
>>225351
If you're posting here with us, you're no better than the other retards.
No.225353
Anonymous
Replies:>>225364
>>225329
It's not really a fair criticism since it assumes so much about a character's supporters and their intents beyond just genuinely liking her. I haven't seen this to this extent with the other characters.
And the cases with with Spinel and Wuya are different since those were definitively proven to be rigged, which is their main source of criticism.
No.225354
Anonymous
Why DOES /tnt/ defend Fang so much? She's not even anthropomorphic let alone mammalian.
No.225355
Anonymous
What are Spider-Man Noir's chances in the tournament based on new show hype?
No.225356
Anonymous
>>225354
Primal is a good fucking show, which is a hard concept for some people to get that you can like a character as a representative of their source material
No.225357
Anonymous
Replies:>>225359
>>225356
You're voting for a character, not a show.
No.225359
Anonymous
>>225357
Then why do Vivziepop characters and Murder Drones characters and Owl house characters also get obliterated, even though they're sexier than a feral dinosaur?
No.225361
Anonymous
>>225305
That's what I meant by NSA ties.

She was the one spreading tha tshit
No.225364
Anonymous
>>225353
>>225356
Autists have a hard time understanding different perspectives.
>>225354
>Why do people like an awesome dinosaur? It needs to be an anthro for me to like it!
Again, try looking at and actually reading the perspectives people keep laying out for you.
No.225365
Anonymous
>>225359
Nothing is sexier than a feral dinosaur.
No.225367
Anonymous
>>225359
Vivzie characters are for girls, Muder Drones is too juvenile and a niche series as already said.
>Owl House
Now you are just a pedo, or a transbian, or both.
No.225370
Anonymous
>>225365
No lies detected btw.
No.225371
Anonymous
I saw a thread about it on the catalog and it got me wondering, how come nuShe-Ra and its fans never attempted to take root in the tournaments like other "zoomertoons" did while it still had something a vocal fanbase?
No.225372
Anonymous
>>225371
I've wondered the same about Voltron and Arcane.
No.225374
Anonymous
Replies:>>225380
>>225371
I think they had enough self awareness to understand why their show wouldn't do well.
>>225372
I can't think of anything for these two however.
No.225375
Anonymous
Replies:>>225384
>>225372
Pretty easy for both
Voltron’s final season came out between 2018 and 2019 and that is when the fandom turned of it for picking the wrong ship (lol) so it was too early a series for tournaments and had no fandom left by the time tournaments got legitimized.
Arcane never did because they are not allowed. Given all the characters originated in League of Legends they would be disqualified so they never bothered
No.225376
Anonymous
>>225372
Voltron crashed and burned so hard it's been almost completely memoryholed, only faintly remembered for its fandom related drama. Most of its audience were women, also.
As for Arcane, the other guy has got a point, but the series also introduced some very popular original characters that would normally be allowed, so idk.
No.225379
Anonymous
Replies:>>225381
Netflix cartoons in general seem to be really ephemeral compared to other cartoons and never stick around in the wider consciousness. Remember when Centaurworld was a thing and competed in one or two tournaments?
No.225380
Anonymous
>>225371
>>225374
Catra has qualified but not since 2020.
No.225381
Anonymous
>>225379
Centaurworld never qualified but it got REALLY close. Like seven votes short close.
No.225383
Anonymous
No.225384
Anonymous
>>225375
I remember Arcane was banned for a year then it was lifted, the characters just didn't get enough votes to qualify.
No.225389
Anonymous
Replies:>>225394
At least the lack of a ton of new material gave us time to deal with the backlog, especially after NSA wasted 2 or 3 years
No.225394
Anonymous
>>225389
Hell, there's still lots of older stuff I wish would start doing better.
No.225412
Anonymous
Replies:>>225423
>>225329
I think some people here get so defensive over Fang because they unironically waifu/want to fuck her.
No.225416
Anonymous
>"Burn out"
KWAB Friends
No.225417
Anonymous
Replies:>>225426
So Smiling Friends is ending after all. Good call, it was cancelling it now or just turning it into a second Rick & Morty as it shrivels up before its imminent death.
No.225418
Anonymous
Image:177208116818.jpg(97kB, 1920x1080)1772080112530691.jpg
The STRONGEST
No.225419
Anonymous
Replies:>>225422
Good that show had a repulsive fanbase.
No.225420
Anonymous
Replies:>>225425
>zach and Michael told none of the crew in advance and they learned via the Twitter post
Lmao
No.225421
Anonymous
Image:177208917187.jpg(325kB, 1185x4096)1771886364163201.jpg
Damn, Meru looks like THAT?
No.225422
Anonymous
>>225419
Seriously, why the fuck does anything created after 2015 just have the worst fanbases? I just want to enjoy things without having to associate with miserable pseuds and throat-biting puritans.
No.225423
Anonymous
>>225412
That’s a very normal thing to do
No.225424
Anonymous
Replies:>>225428
Image:177210121445.jpg(107kB, 824x1024)IMG_1959.jpeg
How we feeling about Ms /co/‘s kids?
No.225425
Anonymous
>>225420
That's fucked up.
No.225426
Anonymous
Replies:>>225427
>>225417
This is cope and SF fans cannot stop thinking about R&M after all these years.
No.225427
Anonymous
>>225426
>thinking about R&M after all these years.
That's not hard to do when nobody else thinks about R&M anymore.
No.225428
Anonymous
>>225424
New Ms /co/ potentials?
No.225429
Anonymous
Replies:>>225435
>>225427
And yet it still makes /co/ seethe despite no one seemingly thinking of it.
No.225430
Anonymous
Replies:>>225431
>>225427
People still talk about it, people have just psyopped themselves into thinking that if something isn't constantly talked about online and trending, it's nothing. Which is ironic considering everyone wanted R&M fans to shut the fuck up.
SF might actually be in danger of being forgotten given the weird circumstances.
No.225431
Anonymous
Replies:>>225432
>>225430
Anon, I'm sorry, but this is just delusional.
No.225432
Anonymous
>>225431
>SF fans calling anyone else delusional
No.225433
Anonymous
My point is that this is just something that happens with something that becomes a long running show; you're just part of pop culture and the novelty has worn off. Not helping its case but it's like with The Simpsons, Family Guy and American Dad.
No.225434
Anonymous
I have never interacted with the Smiling Friends fandom and have no idea what makes it "repulsive".
Judging a show by it's fanbase is gay and saying it's good for it be cancelled is also gay.
No.225435
Anonymous
>>225429
Weren't the comparisons born out of wanting to predict SF would eventually devolve into what happened to R&M if left running for long enough? As in
>pffft, none of you can see this coming but Smiling Friends WILL turn into the next Rick & Morty!
No.225436
Anonymous
Replies:>>225438
>>225422
>why the fuck does anything created after 2015 just have the worst fanbases?
The Great Tumblr Exodus of 2018.
No.225437
Anonymous
>>225435
And even when that didn't happen people are still making the comparison. The attachment between the shows is as forced as the tribe war between TADC and SF.
No.225438
Anonymous
>>225422
>>225436
People have complained about fanbases for well over two decades of not more. Literally nothing is forcing you to interact with these troglodytes, people just want to talk about anything besides the shows themselves.
No.225439
Anonymous
Image:177211412013.jpg(47kB, 516x483)hmmm.jpg
>miserable pseuds and throat-biting puritans.
No.225440
Anonymous
Replies:>>225447
>>225437
...There's a tribe war between TADC and SF?
No.225441
Anonymous
>>225435
>this is going to be the next MLP!
It's almost amazing how much /co/ self sabotages shows they like just because they cannot and will never not get over past bad experiences. At least won't have to worry about pity vote fearmongering with this show.
No.225442
Anonymous
Replies:>>225443
>>225439
Oh no, you are not doing the Redditbot bit here.
No.225443
Anonymous
Replies:>>225444
>>225442
I don't know what that means, I just find it suspicious those exact terms are brought up in reference when Smiling Friends is being talked about.
No.225444
Anonymous
Replies:>>225446
>>225443
The "neopuritanism" schizo doesn't post here, surely.
No.225445
Anonymous
>>225435
Smiling Friends will never become the next Rick and Morty if only because the former show didn’t have a szechuan sauce episode that gave /co/ PTSD since it caused Samurai Jack S5 to skip a week.
No.225446
Anonymous
>>225444
Probably not but he does know about the tournaments and he is not happy about them, at least back then.
No.225447
Anonymous
>>225437
>>225440
No. I have no fucking clue what this guy's talking about.
No.225450
Anonymous
Replies:>>225456
>>225439
I genuinely forgot about the "neopuritan" guy, it just seemed like a good word to describe the people that can't stand a preconceived idea they have being challenged, especially in the sexual terms.
No.225454
Anonymous
Replies:>>225456
>>225422
>miserable pseuds and throat-biting puritans.
I sort of get what you're saying but at the same time I don't cause this is weird phrasing. You talking about how fandoms get overly political and social-coded about media?
No.225456
Anonymous
>>225450
>>225454
Just say /tnt/ instead of bullshit terms like puritan and safe horny.
No.225457
Anonymous
Replies:>>225458
I'm 60% sure this is just a bit, in spite of what Zach said.
No.225458
Anonymous
Replies:>>225459
>SFags spam about how they’re epicilly destroying Richard and Mortimer nihilism
>they die well within Rick and Morty’s lifespan
I don’t even like reddit and memey but this was funny to watch.
>>225457
Copium
No.225459
Anonymous
Replies:>>225460
>>225458
The only copium are shit stirrers trying to stoke this fandom rivalry.
No.225460
Anonymous
Replies:>>225463
>>225459
Oh fucking please. That shit went on for a long ass time. It is not cope to point it out and comment on the irony. Keep coping though I’m sure it’s an epic oneyplays bit.
No.225461
Anonymous
Replies:>>225462
Just saying, a lot of this doesn't add up unless the creators want trouble down the road. Something is up.
No.225462
Anonymous
Replies:>>225464
>>225461
I think newgrounds animators might just be retarded and oblivious to the realities of the industry.
No.225463
Anonymous
Replies:>>225465
>>225460
Keep coping, I'm sure Dan Harmon find your bit funny. I think OneyPlays sucks btw.
No.225464
Anonymous
>>225462
Then there's no hope for that studio they're opening, lol.
No.225465
Anonymous
Replies:>>225466
>>225463
>n-no you
Epic reply anon, you sure showed me. Nice projection with the Dan Harmon thing, you probably think it’s normal to worship show runners.
No.225466
Anonymous
>>225465
>I-I was just pretending to be retarded!
Way to show us. You also brought up OneyPlays first,
No.225467
Anonymous
When did /co/ turn this hard on Smiling Friends? I thought they liked that show.
No.225468
Anonymous
>>225467
Show is good fanbase is insufferable.
So par for the course really.
No.225469
Anonymous
Replies:>>225470
>>225467
Sir, this is /tnt/.
No.225470
Anonymous
>>225469
Oh yeah, I never did get why SF was only a mid card despite early love for the show.
No.225474
Anonymous
Replies:>>225479
Should I use EMH Iron Man or the 90s modular armor for him this year?
No.225479
Anonymous
Replies:>>225491
>>225474
What is your intent?
No.225483
Anonymous
>>225470
People kept saying it was too soon
No.225485
Anonymous
Paramount will now acquire WB, so now they will own almost all /co/ contestants and winners.
Israel owns this contest.
No.225487
Anonymous
>>225485
Most of the winners are from Jewish creators. They already owned it.
No.225489
Anonymous
>>225485
Nothing is official yet and this was after people were dooming over Netflix getting it and Paramount getting rebuffed other times. I'll believe it when the deal is actually done this time.
No.225491
Anonymous
>>225479
At this point, just getting him in and going 1 or 2 rounds is enough for me. I was pleasantly surprised by Hulk so I want to keep that going.
No.225494
Anonymous
>>225470
Smiling Friends competes in Mr. /co/. And in Mr. /co/, simply being liked is not enough.
No.225496
Anonymous
Replies:>>225497
How will Transformers fair this year?
No.225497
Anonymous
>>225496
Very carefully
No.225500
Anonymous
>/co/ keeps saying a character/franchise is ‘too new’, either telling people to hold off or calling them FOTM
>Suddenly that series ends and they’re now dead and irrelevant
Other than TADC rhis has happened to every new years from 2020 onward.
No.225501
Anonymous
>>225500
It’s intentional psyopping
No.225502
Anonymous
>>225500
"Give her the crown already" with extra steps
No.225514
Anonymous
>>225500
It's generally the same sentiment as the Spinel rule, just enforced through voter consensus rather than any explicit rule. I know there are people who have suggested straight up banning characters debuting up to a year beforehand, which is too much, but there's a clear aversion to a potential repeat Spinel that's encoded into the rules itself.

At the same time, I'd say that becoming "dead and irrelevant" is the definition of FOTM. The shelf life for any character that isn't all current thing hype should be longer than that, not that I'd advocate for deferring them indefinitely. I personally like to see a character with at least one tournament of history. It seems less like a fluke if they win it all.
No.225522
Anonymous
Wonder how Spinel would've done in tourneys had she just been barred in 2019 or the movies premiered a week after Ms. instead.
I think she'd have a been midcard in 2020, and then a constantly qualifying lowcard like Lapis or Peridot.
Also if an FOTM had been implemented in 2019 Pearl or Peridot might've gone further than QF as Spinel power stand-ins.
No.227118
Anonymous
>Courage creator shilling scam shitcoins with Courage
Is it over
No.227359
Anonymous
>>227118
I don't give a shit what the guy is doing. Courage ended in 2002 and remains a great show. Fog of Courage and the Scooby crossover don't count.
No.227435
Anonymous
Replies:>>227808
>>227118
Why would that do anything? I think you overestimate how much voters care about every little thing that happens. At best it will be used to derail the threads and falseflag that doesn’t work.
No.227505
Anonymous
Replies:>>228039
>>227118
>thought the dude was hacked
>learn he's now going to be at a panel shilling crypto
Damn shame, but doesn't change his magnum opus is still great to this day.
No.227686
Anonymous
Replies:>>227743
>trolling
>genuine retardation in the form of somehow not understanding things like “plot” and “build up”
>occasional post that actually tries to talk about the show, either to praise it or criticize it in a way that’s actually constructive
>poopdickschizofag convincing himself that everyone criticizing or insulting the season is a discord raider or a gaslighter
>threads get slower and slower with every episode
Primal threads have been sucking the last few weeks. Probably a combo of this season not being amazing and 4chan in general getting worse. But even season 2 threads just a few years ago weren’t like this.
No.227743
Anonymous
>>227686
Yeesh, I get it. I like season 3 but only real harsh thing I can say against it is 10 episodes doesn't feel even close to enough time for it. What a weird trend, 10 was plenty for the first season, 10 was tight for the second but could've worked with better editing, 10 for three is blatantly not enough, I feel like we're only in the mid point.
No.227808
Anonymous
>>227435
Courage’s entire appeal and campaign is on how he is a cute wholesome chungus and that is a bit tainted now
No.227823
Anonymous
Replies:>>228039
>>227118
I don't think it's a big deal. Legacy characters don't get sullied over new things on /co/.
No.227837
Anonymous
Replies:>>227846
>>227808
Texan trying to poison the well for the 21497th time...
No.227844
Anonymous
Replies:>>228040
I like Eustace more as a Mr. /co/ winner.
No.227846
Anonymous
Replies:>>228036
>>227837
>Every opinion or news I don’t like is Texnig or Irishnig
No.227872
Anonymous
Tangled thread on /co/ had me wondering if Rapunzel could ever make a big breakthrough one day. Disney characters tend to not do well but she's very well-liked and Tangled pretty regularly still gets threads.
No.227873
Anonymous
>>227872
Nvm I just checked the results and was surprised to see that she hasn't qualified since 2022. Bit of a shock.
No.227875
Anonymous
>>227872
I haven't seen her as very prominent. If any Disney hoe's breaking the mold its Tinkerbell imo.
No.228010
Anonymous
Replies:>>228040
Image:177293127474.png(211kB, 500x375)puter.png
Maybe with the CRYPTOuage debuff you twits will actually vote me in!
No.228011
Anonymous
Replies:>>228040
>crypto courage
No.228036
Anonymous
>>227846
Schizo schizoing has honestly ruined these tournaments.
No.228037
Anonymous
>>227808
Legitimately, what the fuck are you talking about
No.228038
Anonymous
Replies:>>228080
Not to sound like a crypto bro but I don't get why this is getting people's panties in a twist. Bitcoin is stupid but people are acting like this dude raped and murdered someone. Comes across as parasocial as fuck.
No.228039
Anonymous
Replies:>>228044
>>227505
>>227823
>this is totally a shame...but I'm still voting for the dog in mr. /co/
I can tell how serious people are taking this.
No.228040
Anonymous
>>227844
>>228010
>>228011
This is going to be great for his campaign this year. Mr. will be redeemed.
No.228044
Anonymous
Replies:>>228067
>>228039
They are taking this the right amount of serious because this is the most milquetoast "news" and most forced controversy I've seen, which is saying something.
Reminder that /co/ knew about this back in February and the thread only got about 50 posts. Truly Courage is hosed, amirite?
No.228067
Anonymous
>>228044
I do not see how insider pump and dump controversies are forced
Actively trying to scam your fans with criminal activity is pretty fucked. And creators being like this has shown it does not benefit their creations in tournaments (see how Ren And Stimpy had never qualified for Mr /co/)
No.228069
Anonymous
>>228067
Quit concern trolling Texan.
No.228072
Anonymous
>>228067
>shilling crypto (which is what what Dilworth did) is on par with raping women and abusing your staff (which is what John K did)
So this is why /v/ keeps calling you guys tumblr.
No.228080
Anonymous
>>228038
Get with the program, AI and crypto are le bad no matter the context or volume.
No.228084
Anonymous
Spider-Man already won so we'll have to see how this year will pan out for Supergirl and maybe Clayface. I have no hope for the Lanterns.
No.228135
Anonymous
Replies:>>228235
I don't think this will impact Courage but I've also thought that Courage isn't going to win for awhile yet.
No.228235
Anonymous
>>228135
Hank and Jack kind of foreshadowed that.
No.228406
Anonymous
>>228067
You're blatantly concern trolling. Stop trying so hard.