/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Thread stats: 610 posts, 28 files (28 image(s))

Replying to /tnt/177807
Options
No.177807
/co/ All-Stars/EE8 Tournament Speculation/Waiting RoomAnonymous
Image:173734342549.png(847kB, 1633x413)EE8.png
This thread is for discussing and planning a possible /co/ all-stars tourney.

As you may know /co/ is about to have its 8th tourney year and crown it's 8th Ms. and Mr. /co/ champion. The first eight winners have been dubbed by many as the "all stars" or Elite-Elite 8 (EE8) line-up. Many have also brought up and hyped for a while the possibility of a tourney between these first eight winners. This is would be a one time opportunity, aligning with the "elite 8" tournament concept, and a similar all-stars thing (after waiting another eight years for 16 winners) may be unlikely as it's so far in the future.

How should an all-stars tourney go down? When? Where? What do we think would happen? ect. Generally celebrate or judge our winners too I guess.
No.177812
Anonymous
The boring answer is to just do a final ranking of the first eight winners in each tournament. Basically the usual 5th-8th votes, except that it's for all eight positions.
No.177813
Anonymous
Replies:>>177910
No point if Jenny and Johnny are probably going to win this.
No.177814
Anonymous
Replies:>>177818
>>177807
This would be interesting only if the Ms. one was about voting for the worst instead of the best.
No.177818
Anonymous
>>177814
I mean that's basically what could be done with a traditional QF kind of round with 5-8th ranking determining the losers.
No.177910
Anonymous
Replies:>>177942
>>177813
Yeah Jenny sweeps the girl's side, no contest
Johhny probably too, but I will say I'm a huge fan of both Tom and Kronk
No.177917
Anonymous
Image:173737387404.jpg(84kB, 600x450)how-much-money-did-the-sam-raimi-spider-man-movies-make.jpg
THE STRONGESTchads... It's our time.
No.177942
Anonymous
>>177910
Tom or Kronk would be neat, I agree, though Johnny is already one of the most OP characters in tournament history, he was the only human that stood a chance in Playboy.
No.177943
Anonymous
Also two more Tag Tournaments until they get their own all star lineup. The winner for the hypothetical tournament would probably be down to either Freelance Police or Mystery Inc., Cognito is definitely getting fucked.
No.177947
Anonymous
Honestly don’t do a tourney, just do a poll on a form either next year or in 26 to rank the winners
No.177948
Anonymous
What's the chances ms. this year has a really fucking awesome winner that is agreed by most to surpass even Jenny?
No.177949
Anonymous
Replies:>>177950
>>177948
Raven and Toph are both coming back this year.
No.177950
Anonymous
Replies:>>177951
>>177949
>>177948
Raven, Toph, and maybe Eris and Jessia Rabbit are the only one's I can think of that maybe could be widely agreeable on that level, but it'd depend on them getting a big quality campaign and not silent majoonering into finals. I'd add Chel but I get the feeling even if she did get a big campaign she's carrying too much baggage the the big bad silent rep at this point.
No.177951
Anonymous
>>177950
Toph has almost always had at least decently active campaigns but there was that unfortunate 2020-2023 jobbing streak that really threw her off. Luckily I think she's killed her jobber status for good after 2023, so I have high hopes she can finally make it this year as she would easily surpass Jenny for me as the best possible Nicktoons winner, let alone best Ms. Winner.
>(Chel) is carrying too much baggage as the big bad silent rep at this point.
You have to remember Frankie had that exact same reputation going into 2024 and she completely flipped it around. If she gets a good campaign like Frankie had with her drawfags I can see her pulling off a win
No.177952
Anonymous
Frieza is gay
No.177953
Anonymous
A side tourney would be fun but it would probably be relegated to here and not /co/. Better off just doing a ranked vote maybe during the 2025 after party
No.177956
Anonymous
Replies:>>177957
My suggestion is make it a /tnt/ thing friday after Mr. /co/. Have it be split, one side of the bracket female, one side male, crown the super champ for each gender and then maybe an ultra monarch with the two super champs or something.
No.177957
Anonymous
>>177956
That’s a dumb idea, I’d rather /co/ be able to vote on something like this rather than just confirming the circlejerks we have on here. They won Mr and Ms /co/ not Mr and Ms /tnt/
No.177958
Anonymous
>>177957
Adding to this: /co/ and /tnt/ have VERY different tastes and thus the results would be vastly different based on which board it’s hosted on. Remember when we swore brisby would sweep last year?
No.177960
Anonymous
Replies:>>177961
>>177957
I think that's just what's most practical if it's gonna be a normal tourney format and not a single round poll in the afterparty.
No.177961
Anonymous
Replies:>>177970
>>177960
Then we should just have an afterparty poll, not everything has to be a big tourney
No.177962
Anonymous
>>177957
This is a big reason why I was pushing for >>177812. It's not only cut and dry, but you can absolutely fit that onto the end of each major tournament.
No.177964
Anonymous
>>177812
I agree with this
No.177969
Anonymous
If it's not a tourney and just a side poll I wouldn't be shocked if Spinel or Fang end up as one of the best performers just for the contrarian factor. Remember Battler swept the 4-way king loser's bracket because he had "Crown Steal" behind him while the not-Shitposting crowd couldn't decide whether to rally behind Wario, Peppino or Jacket since all are well-liked vidya guys
No.177970
Anonymous
Replies:>>177971
>>177961
A poll's kind of lame. A big part of this (for me at least) was having the winners back in a tourney format again and having them go head to head directly in this retrospective context.
No.177971
Anonymous
Replies:>>177976
>>177970
I'd much rather have a nice cut and dry poll that is ACTUALLY ON /co/. Because if it's /tnt/ all we get is a small portion of the voterbase with, as I said, a drastically different taste than the actual board.
No.177972
Anonymous
https://strawpoll.com/PKgleVRG1Zp
No.177973
Anonymous
>>177972
Neither.
No.177974
Anonymous
>>177972
Do the "final ranking" on /co/ itself. If anons really want a full 16 all-star tournament, then just do it off-season. That seems like the best compromise.
No.177976
Anonymous
>>177971
It can somewhat helped by advertising it a bunch and encouraging anon's to participate here.
No.177979
Anonymous
>>177951
>Easily surpass Jenny
I like Toph but no.
No.177995
Anonymous
>>177951
/co/ is a lot more forgiving that I can see Chel avoiding being another Tifa situation.
No.178016
Anonymous
Replies:>>178018
>>177951
/tnt/ stop being delusional challenge: Impossible
No.178017
Anonymous
Replies:>>178026
Image:173749435253.png(133kB, 374x366)IMG_7120.png
Tbh fam if this does happen Im expecting my girl to be low ranking. I’d be happy with 5th or above though
No.178018
Anonymous
Replies:>>178019
>>178016
There's nothing really delusional about that particular post though.
No.178019
Anonymous
>>178018
>Toph would easily surpass Jenny as the favorite winner
No.178020
Anonymous
Replies:>>178034
>>177951
>>178019
I don't know about "easily surpass" but I think she'd easily be 2nd best all things considered. I can't really think of anyone that would, in a board-wide agreeable sense, be regarded as easily surpassing Jenny. Same as looking for someone that would easily surpass Bravo, Armstrong, or Samus. They're inaugurals for a reason.
No.178022
Anonymous
Replies:>>178043
>>178019
Yeah? I can see it.
No.178024
Anonymous
long shot prediction that either betty or monarch ends up in last and is forever mocked for being less popular than spinel, fang, and wuya
No.178026
Anonymous
>>178017
I'm a bit surprised at people putting Fang so low in predictions. Meta stuff only tourneyfags here know in-depth aside she still has a novelty factor and Primal is still a /co/ favorite, and her run was the hypest in /co/ tourney history. When she won it felt like she could take on every other winner. I can see her getting upper half at least.
No.178029
Anonymous
Replies:>>178032
>>178026
Idk, maybe it’s the constant hate she gets but I don’t like her odds. I’d be happy with 6th, as long as it’s not last or second to last.
No.178031
Anonymous
>>178026
Fang is a King /v/ winner for Ms /co/ if King /v/ could pick better winners
No.178032
Anonymous
>>178029
I can't see anyone ranking lower than Spinel and Wuya unless this year's winner is rancid somehow. They seem like solid 8th and 7th placers.
No.178034
Anonymous
Replies:>>178037
>>178020
Dante is tough competition for Armstrong, but I feel Armstrong has the advantage of feeling like more of a special winner. With Samus, I feel nearly anyone with an argument over her has already won.
No.178037
Anonymous
>>178034
I'm speaking in terms of general appeal, not tourney autists specifics. Dante might have an edge on Armstrong but not easily. Samus I feel would still come across as the biggest general /v/ favorite.
No.178038
Anonymous
Will Chel do well this year or will she be stuck with the curse of the pooper
No.178039
Anonymous
Replies:>>178041
>>178038
I hope she never does well ever again.
No.178040
Anonymous
Image:173750636635.gif(1,007kB, 300x180)wwalks into thread.gif
>>178038
CURSE? I THINK YOU MEAN BLESSING! I PLAN ON SIGNING CHEL ON FOR THE NEXT SEASON, AND I CAN'T WAIT TO SHIT ON HER WHILE SHE'S GETTING RAPED BY A MOTORCYCLE GANG, A BLACK MOTORCYCLE GANG!
No.178041
Anonymous
>>178039
Fang…
No.178042
Anonymous
>>178038
She would have to get a campaign which is unlikely, and ittodler will probably be falseflagging her again so no.
No.178043
Anonymous
>>178022
Considering ms. is partially a waifu contest, I don't see Toph surpassing Jenny in that aspect
No.178058
Anonymous
Replies:>>178251
>>177812
Personally I feel the best would be to do a sort of round robin thing during the tournament where each round the character with the least votes is eliminated
No.178060
Anonymous
Fang is still the only winner we have canon lewds of
No.178071
Anonymous
Replies:>>178251
How would the seeding work? The easy option is to just pit the champions for each year against each other in Round 1 but that would mean either Jenny or Johnny is out immediately.
No.178072
Anonymous
The funny thing is this whole concept started as a funpost as it was always attached with comments saying that tournaments were going to end after it happened
No.178073
Anonymous
>>178072
God I wish that were true
No.178079
Anonymous
Replies:>>178082
>>178072
*canonical tournaments
No.178082
Anonymous
>>178079
… in bizarro world.
No.178087
Anonymous
>>178026
>Meta stuff only tourneyfags here know in-depth
the fang debacle happened in plain sight right in the afterparty threads, out of all the champion scandals it's probably the one non-tourneyheads will know the best, right behind the OG spinel shitshow.
No.178250
Anonymous
Replies:>>178271
The cumulative ms. placements based off people's prior rankings and general attitude is easy to guess.
>1. Jenny
>2. Frankie
>3. Monarch
>4. Betty
>5. Fang
>6. Wuya
>7. Spinel
Mr. is much more difficult and people got different opinions all over the place. Maybe Bravo cumulatively tops and Zorak and Grievous are most often at the bottom.
I don't think it's a locked deal for anyone anyhow. And seems to me the more people say x is guaranteed to happen the less it tends to happen.
No.178251
Anonymous
>>178071
That's partly why I suggest >>178058 as it would mean we don't need to deal with no seeding
No.178271
Anonymous
Replies:>>178284
>>178250
Mostly agree, but believe Fang is being undersold here.
No.178284
Anonymous
>>178271
Thread and tourneyfag opinions of course aren't perfectly accurate. I'd say /co/ in general would put her up one or two spots.
No.178297
Anonymous
I shall rally fanggang in 2025
No.178298
Anonymous
Frieza is gay
No.178300
Anonymous
Sad thing is this heckin All Star Elite 8 meme is going to fuck up the /co/ tournaments this year because people are going to be autistic that it has to be a powerhouse to be a final pick for this initial chapter
I’d say there’s about 6 Ms /co/ contestants and 4 Mr /co/ contestants that have a realistic chance this year about that
No.178302
Anonymous
>>178300
>Sad thing is [/tnt/ babble]
No one outside of this site gives a fuck about an EE8 tournament and even less are going to change their voting preferences because of that.
No.178304
Anonymous
>>178300
I don't think people will care. And knowing ms. /co/ that could result in the opposite effect anyways.
No.178324
Anonymous
No.178350
Anonymous
I'm starting to get the feeling doomfagging about people using the EE8 as an argument is gonna be worse than people actually using EE8 as an argument.
No.178410
Anonymous
Replies:>>178762
People are just gonna have an extra excuse to declare whatever winners they don't like as non-canon next year.
No.178760
Anonymous
Replies:>>178825
You know if you removed the context entirely the ms. /co/ line-up ain't that bad.
No.178762
Anonymous
>>178410
Who cares people do that every year
No.178825
Anonymous
Replies:>>178827
No.178827
Anonymous
>>178825
Well think about it.
>Spinel: yes the board hates SU but in the context of 2019 it's very understandable that she'd win, plus Spinel in herself is arguably the best thing to come out of SU and watching her it's very easy to see why a damaged peppy BPD alien reaper girl swept up so many anon's
>Monarch: A straight up decent pick from a renown show /co/ loves
>Betty: The toppest legacy pick.
>Fang: Similar to Spinel, very understandable why she'd win 2022, but also /co/ actually loves Primal
>Wuya: 2000's /co/core waifu, fetish bait, pretty much everyone knows her and she's arguably the most remarkable thing about her series
It's when you add on how they won it becomes a parade of "bad" winners.
No.178828
Anonymous
Replies:>>178829
>>178300
>>178302
wouldn't it be funny if guy gagne won this year just so we could have him lose the all stars tourney?
No.178829
Anonymous
>>178828
Wouldn't it be funnier if a snail won instead?
No.178833
Anonymous
If it's held here Johnny and Jenny won't win cause it's been predicted too much meaning subversion meta dictates it won't happen.
No.178866
Anonymous
Replies:>>178867
I think monarch and fang are good winners
No.178867
Anonymous
Replies:>>178871
>>178866
Monarch is alright. 7/10
Fang almost feels impossible to evaluate. On a purely character level i'm meh on her.
No.178868
Anonymous
Fang was FOTM (Primal was airing season 2 at the time of her win), a meme pick, an anti-coom meta pick, and a "why wasn't Genndy won already?" (Grievous is George Lucas' creation) pity pick all rolled into one. Prove me wrong.
No.178869
Anonymous
Replies:>>178872
>>178868
Fang got third place and got extremely close to beating the champion when she was in off season
No.178871
Anonymous
Replies:>>178872
>>178867
>>178868
Fang's problem is her meta novelty hype which I don't think ages well + really weird circumstances of 2022. There was the big rigger conundrum in round 3 where a bunch of (apparently) rigged picks were just left to continue and keep winning and Fang ended up facing rigged competition to win. And the win was basically a host lock since NSA was set on having her win against Shirley regardless. Why not just have Fang face Chel if they really thought that? I don't know. Just strange win all around for Fang.
No.178872
Anonymous
Replies:>>178874
>>178869
That doesn’t really disprove anything.
>>178868
>>178871
There are too many novelty and meta winners in addition to people feeling coomers are being discriminated against.
No.178874
Anonymous
>>178872
>coomers being discriminated against
Cry me a fucking river
No.178876
Anonymous
>>178874
They should've done more for the horny contests, playgirl this year was a ghost town
No.178877
Anonymous
>>178876
They were all inside my belly.
No.178879
Anonymous
Replies:>>178883
>>178876
I don't care about furries.
No.178883
Anonymous
Replies:>>178885
>>178879
How do I know that you voted for Death then?
No.178885
Anonymous
Replies:>>178892
>>178883
Nta, but I'm gay. That's why I hated playgirl.
No.178886
Anonymous
>>178874
Yeah we only care about sexy people if they’re animal people, dumb fucking coomers don’t get that amirite /tnt/!?!?!?
No.178890
Anonymous
>>178886
Who are you quoting?
No.178892
Anonymous
>>178885
Should we just get rid of Playgirl?
No.178893
Anonymous
>>178886
Seethe more playloser
No.178896
Anonymous
Replies:>>178899
>coomer meltdown
This is why fang won
No.178899
Anonymous
>>178896
Voting for something cause it’s anti-coom is even gayer than voting for something cause it’s coom. At least the latter is some kind of interest in the character innately.
No.178903
Anonymous
>>178899
I voted for her because I like the show and character. Not my fault others vote with their cocks
No.178904
Anonymous
Replies:>>178905
When you start using phrases like “discriminated against” in a 4chan tournament discussion then you’re too far gone
No.178905
Anonymous
>>178899
This is true. People have more than likely never watched MLAATR, Venture Bros, or Foster’s but they had that innate interest in the character’s attractiveness.
>>178903
You have never seen a single episode of the show she comes from.
>>178904
Then stop voting for anti coom characters?
No.178906
Anonymous
Image:173921502162.jpg(3.62MB, 5712x4284)IMG_9691.jpeg
>>178905
>you have never seen an episode of the show she comes from
I have both seasons on blu ray you fucking tard
No.178907
Anonymous
>Puritan meltdown
This is why Frankie won
No.178908
Anonymous
>>178905
>stop voting for anti coom characters
Im sorry that I just vote for the characters I enjoy regardless of coom. I’m not really sorry but you know what I mean. I’m not going to vote for a character because I know a lot of people coom to them, I won’t not vote for them because of it, but I’m not going to use that for points in their favor
No.178909
Anonymous
>>178907
The funny thing is I supported Frankie in 24 because I like her show and character
No.178910
Anonymous
>>178909
But /co/ told me no one actually likes Foster’s Home just like they also told me no one actually likes MLAATR, how could it be possible that the board full of twitter screencap threads and e-celeb threads was wrong?
No.178911
Anonymous
Replies:>>178912
>>178910
/co/ and /tnt/ are constantly saying “no one likes *insert winner here*” which ignores how they won in the first place. Sore losers I guess.
No.178912
Anonymous
>>178911
Yeah, even Spinel the FOTM rig pick still had to have some merit to get that far in 2019, even if people think she would’ve lost to Raven without that Facebook group brigade.
No.178913
Anonymous
>>178909
>>178910
This isn't really helping the puritan allegations
No.178914
Anonymous
>>178907
>get BTFO
>"y-you are having a m-meltdown!!1!"
Pathetic display.
No.178915
Anonymous
Replies:>>178927
>>178903
The original point is (one of) Fang's meta joke hype things was how anti-coom she was. She's a fucking dino and it sticks it to all the normal waifufags or something. People voting for something to vote AGAINST another thing is worse than voting for that thing even if it's shallow imo cause as far as character tourneys go it's gay meta shit.
>>178905
>>178910
Anyone on /co/ saying that is a faggot. Frankie, Monarch, and Jenny all got far primarily cause they are watched, known, and liked in their shows in era they aired in. Most of /co/ watched those shows, they're popular childhood airings.
No.178916
Anonymous
Replies:>>178924
>>178906
Based, I own both seasons as well. Such a good show, love Fang as a winner
No.178918
Anonymous
“You have to vote for characters if people coom to them!” Is pretty close to the usual /tnt/ “you have to vote for the powerhouses!” shit

I’m not going to hold either of those against them, but those aren’t going to be deciding factors of who I vote for. It’s a popularity contest where you vote for who you like more, so I will vote for who I like regardless of meta nonsense.
No.178919
Anonymous
>>178918
I thought the stereotype was that /tnt/ hated powerhouses and that you only have to vote for characters who roleplay more than the other opponent regardless of popularity.
No.178920
Anonymous
>>178918
>“You have to vote for characters if people coom to them!”
No one's fucking saying this. The complaint was people doing the polar opposite meta stuff about Fang.
This place always has the reading comprehension of a goose.
No.178921
Anonymous
Image:173922025139.jpg(1.10MB, 1179x832)IMG_9693.jpeg
Reminds me of the masters 8 thing from the pokemon anime, maybe people will draw them in this format?
No.178922
Anonymous
Replies:>>178925
>>178919
/tnt/‘s stereotype is they like campaigns and use it as the deciding factor over character merit. They can very much like powerhouses if they are vocal and heavily campaigned and roleplayed but they hate powerhouses that are silent but are being voted on for the character
No.178923
Anonymous
>>178920
There’s a reason they voted for Fang; they can’t read at all
No.178924
Anonymous
Replies:>>178928
>>178916
>>178906
Why do you hate coom so much?
No.178925
Anonymous
Replies:>>178929
>>178919
>>178922
/tnt/ is fucking stupid and shouldn’t be voting in these things.
No.178926
Anonymous
Replies:>>178935
>>178920
>reading comprehension
I've been reading this convo and it seems more like people are accusing anyone who voted for Fang of being an anticoomer, regardless if they actually voted for on character or because they like her show.
Seeing meta where there isn't is pretty meta poisoned.
No.178927
Anonymous
Replies:>>178953
>>178915
Just because people watched the shows doesn’t mean they were liked. Plenty of people were saying that Jenny and Frankie were the only good things in their shows.
Also how is “it aired in my childhood” better than other gay meta shit?
No.178928
Anonymous
Replies:>>178933
>>178924
>you voted fang because you hate coom
>no I like her and her show a lot
>you haven’t seen any of it
>*provides proof of owning both seasons*
>”why do you hate coom”
Why is voting for someone not for coom reasons such an alien concept to some people? God forbid someone votes for a character they like from a show they like. Other people can’t fap to it and it makes them mad so you shouldn’t vote for them
No.178929
Anonymous
Replies:>>178932
>>178925
But my literal who must win
No.178930
Anonymous
Replies:>>178931
>/tnt/ is having trouble grasping the idea of popularity contests
Huh, almost like this place is a circlejerk of like 20 spergs
No.178931
Anonymous
>>178930
Fang isn't popular
No.178932
Anonymous
>>178929
When has a literal who won these things?
No.178933
Anonymous
>>178928
"My literal who must win!"
Yup, this sounds like /tnt/ alright.
No.178934
Anonymous
Replies:>>178938
>>178931
>>178933
>more /tnt/ schizobabble
This place is so out of touch with /co/ it isn’t even funny
No.178935
Anonymous
Replies:>>178936
>>178926
>people are accusing anyone who voted for Fang of being an anticoomer,
No, just that that was a factor for some during her run, part of her novelty. Or at least that’s what i’m saying. I can’t speak for the other anon.
No.178936
Anonymous
>>178935
How exactly did you know it was a factor? Were people actually saying they wanted to stick it to the coomers or this like how Wonder Woman was headcanoned to be the Cheesecake pick.
No.178937
Anonymous
Replies:>>178941
No.178938
Anonymous
Replies:>>178940
>>178934
>Fang
>not the /tnt/ novelty pick
The only out of touch with /co/ is you
No.178939
Anonymous
>>178936
This exact argument played out in 2020, people accused fang gang of just being anti coomers voting for a meme, and no amount of justification from fang supporters could sway them
No.178940
Anonymous
>>178938
/tnt/ fucking hates fang lmao, look at this thread
No.178941
Anonymous
>>178937
Fang is not a literal who
No.178942
Anonymous
Replies:>>178954
>NOOOOOOOOOOO THE CHARACTER WITH THE MOST PIECES OF ART ON THE BOORU ISNT POPULAR AT ALL
>NOOOOOOOOOOO NO ONE LIKES HER IT DOESNT MATTER SHE WAS THE POWERHOUSE TO END ALL POWERHOUSES
I see we’ve hit the phase of denial of basic facts
No.178943
Anonymous
>>178932
Recette, Batter, Cognito, Glamgals, Torres, Grimm to name a few.
No.178944
Anonymous
Image:173922788288.jpg(53kB, 221x301)1663476955044880.jpg
>We've come to the point where we can lie through our teeth and people eat it up
The true and definitive census around Fang wasn't that she was rigged by vote in 2022, its that the finals results were altered and dictatorially changed by the host.
Fang was the clear winner even by vote turnout but the runner up was announced to be chel when she lost in semi-finals.
And the actual runner up, Spinel, is the only definitive pick that was most certain to be rigged to high hell.

Wanted to clear this because many people weren't there it seems and are thinking that fang was rigged when it wasn't exactly that.
>Fang wasn't popular
Lol. Lmao even.
No.178945
Anonymous
Replies:>>178954
>>178944
Welcome to /tnt/, where the facts are made up and reality doesn’t matter
No.178946
Anonymous
>>178944
This is the site that called Cass vs Eda a Milf Vs Gilf fight despite the fact Eda is a couple years younger than Cass.
No.178947
Anonymous
Replies:>>178950
>>178936
Because she's a fucking dino. FANG GANG and all that shit had a big memey and ironical element (including when it came to "sexualizing" her) and a lot of people supporting her ended up doing so as just part of the hype.
>>178944
I don't think i've seen anyone call her straight up rigged. I've seen a lot of comments over the years that the tourney and her win had odd circumstances though, being the whole round 3 fiasco with NSA and the finale swap as you said.
No.178950
Anonymous
Replies:>>178952
>>178947
>Because she's a fucking dino.
That’s not being anti coom, you can just like something for being a dinosaur.
>FANG GANG and all that shit had a big memey and ironical element (including when it came to "sexualizing" her)
I don’t think anyone is memeing when they want to fuck a dinosaur; it’s the same board that would genuinely jerk off to a curvy piece of driftwood.

Again, posts like these really put words in people’s mouths and assume there could only be meta reasons or irony or memes or hypes instead of the simple answer of “I like this character and their show.”
No.178951
Anonymous
Dinosaurs are cool. Simple as.
No.178952
Anonymous
Replies:>>178954
>>178950
I think you're daft if you actually took all Fang stuff at face value.
In any case, it's worth noting the Fang "coom" posting was acceptable and didn't hold her back cause it was perceived as ironical and not actually sexy to most, in a similar way homo's can get away with a bunch of gay stuff as a "joke."
No.178953
Anonymous
>>178927
Anyone who thinks Vexus or most of the Imaginary Friends from Foster’s Home aren’t cool is a ginormous faggot.
No.178954
Anonymous
Replies:>>178962
>>178942
>>178944
>>178945
This isn't about rigging, it's about Fang being used as a weapon to screw over coomers.
>>178952
And that's what people mean. Everything about Fang was ironic, even down to people posting DVDs for some fucking reason.
No.178955
Anonymous
Image:173923156945.jpg(225kB, 1280x720)mvc1roster.jpg
>>177807
I'm waiting for this year's results so we can have Mr. /co/ vs King /v/. Spidey's even here already.
No.178956
Anonymous
>>178955
You can also apply this to MvC3 since Dante is also a winner.
No.178958
Anonymous
Replies:>>178969
>People can’t like the cool dinosaur for any reason other than irony
I don’t care about Fang and thinks she’s a mediocre winner but this is an extremely retarded argument.
No.178960
Anonymous
You have it half right
Fang wasn't an ironic anti-coom pick in entirety. Fang was a pick for people who wanted character personality (like it is in Mr /co/) to take precedence over being most coomable. It's less anti-coom as much as appreciating character over coom
Fang is a strong character, and that she had a stronger one than most the lifeless powerhouse girls /co/ circlejerks despite being a fucking dinosaur says a lot
No.178961
Anonymous
Replies:>>178968
I think anyone who considers a mute dinosaur to be a stronger character than girls like Raven or Toph needs a reality check and an in depth conversation about why coolness isn’t a replacement for an actual personality.
No.178962
Anonymous
>>178954
>posting DVD’s is ironic
Jesus fucking Christ this board has so much brainrot it isn’t even funny. I posted them as proof I watched and like the show, why would I own two blu rays of a show I didn’t watch IRONICALLY?

You people are so stupid
No.178964
Anonymous
>Owning merchandise that you had to pay for with money you earned makes you an ironic fan because… because it just does okay!?!?!?
No.178965
Anonymous
>>178962
Fang is not a good character. Raven and Toph mog her easily personality wise.
No.178966
Anonymous
Hell I even have an unofficial primal shirt, because there isn’t an official one
>>178965
That has nothing to do with what I said. What the fuck is wrong with you
No.178967
Anonymous
Image:173923266682.jpg(152kB, 1064x1200)IMG_2102.jpeg
>>178965
No.178968
Anonymous
>>178961
I will give you Toph but no one ever talks about Raven's personality in the tournaments, let alone it being a strong personality.
Hell, Toph is more like Fang in that personality and love for the source material were big factors in getting far over looks.
No.178969
Anonymous
>>178958
The claim is that SOME people to SOME degree voted in ironical and meta fashion about Fang and it was rather apparent given the nature of these tourneys, especially ms. /co/, that this was part of what was making up her powerhouse run. MY claim at least has always been this. But because I'm on /tnt/ we must talk in reductive ABSOLUTES all the fucking time.
I'm tired of arguing about tourney meta. It never goes anywhere or actually changes anyone's opinion.
No.178971
Anonymous
Replies:>>178975
>>178969
Were you the anon who was accusing people of never watching Primal? Because if you are AND you were the one who said posting merch was “ironic” then it really goes against your claims here.
No.178972
Anonymous
Replies:>>178975
>>178969
Every character has some sort of tourney meta attached them whether it's coom, irony, memes, roleplay, etc.
The only reason people complain about the meta is if it doesn't go their way.
No.178973
Anonymous
>>178969
>But because I'm on /tnt/ we must talk in reductive ABSOLUTES all the fucking time.
But remember /co/ is the one in the wrong because…muh e-celeb threads and muh twitter screenshots.
No.178974
Anonymous
Replies:>>178984
Image:173923321181.jpg(81kB, 708x458)91f6905965338dd2c2bde1c5258694f5.jpg
>>178955
Samurai Jack please close the Mr. /co/ elite 8 by breaking the runner-up curse for /co/.
No.178975
Anonymous
Replies:>>178977
>>178971
>Were you the anon who was accusing people of never watching Primal?
no.
>>178972
The complaint typically arises when meta overrules the character being a natural pick in an extreme or very undue way (i.e. the character is pretty widely regarded as shit).
No.178976
Anonymous
Image:173923326299.jpg(443kB, 1072x594)IMG_9694.jpeg
>>178962
>And that's what people mean. Everything about Fang was ironic, even down to people posting DVDs for some fucking reason.
Do you actually believe this? My mind says it’s bait but at the same time this is /tnt/.
No.178977
Anonymous
Replies:>>178982
>>178975
>The complaint typically arises when meta overrules the character being a natural pick in an extreme or very undue way
Every character gets this accusation at some point
No.178978
Anonymous
Replies:>>178986
>>178969
>I'm tired of arguing about tourney meta. It never goes anywhere or actually changes anyone's opinion.
And you will continue to argue about it. Because when people say they're tired of it, they really can’t get enough of it.
No.178979
Anonymous
Image:173923349959.jpg(72kB, 848x472)Dbz.jpg
If I see another post about this retarded argument after this one, I'll rape Kakarot's child.
No.178982
Anonymous
Replies:>>178999
>>178977
Not really. It's never been a real complaint that Zorak or Frankie got a campaign boost. People like those characters and the campaigns are a tasteful accompaniment of them. People complain Hex Maniac or Batter did cause the campaign was basically not about the character and the swayed voters didn't have grounding in actually liking the character themself. The latter is why the term "campooner" even came about.
No.178984
Anonymous
Replies:>>178996
>>178974
If Genndy gets a third fucking win people will seethe lmao
No.178986
Anonymous
Replies:>>178989
>>178978
I do like analyzing meta. I don't like debating the same old thing twenty times though.
No.178987
Anonymous
Just make it easy and start spamming your Mr Incredible image or some DBZ Yabba funpost, you're too obvious
No.178989
Anonymous
Replies:>>178998
>>178986
It’s the same thing. Why is meta so important to this site even considering this is the tournament board?
No.178990
Anonymous
Image:173923411678.jpg(21kB, 686x386)deadpoolandwolverine.jpg
...Gubernatorial.
No.178991
Anonymous
Image:173923412508.gif(875kB, 282x212)bejitabro.gif
No.178992
Anonymous
>>178987
Wouldn't be a complete /tnt/ discussion without the poopdickschizo post.
No.178993
Anonymous
>>178987
Who are you quoting?
No.178994
Anonymous
>>178987
Is Mr. Incrediblefag in the room with us right now?
No.178996
Anonymous
>>178984
Samurai Jack is our Princess Zelda. We can’t let the joke end.
No.178998
Anonymous
>>178989
/tnt/'s existence itself is literally tourney meta.
No.178999
Anonymous
Replies:>>179002
>>178982
Didn't campooner start on /co/?
No.179002
Anonymous
>>178999
I mean the latter voting tendency. Yes it started on /co/, ms. 2023 to be exact.
No.179012
Anonymous
I dunno, I think the funniest shit ever was when Wuya (and Eris) were propped up as a “le heckin campaign queen” that led to a still undelivered porn OC and being one of the factors to NSA’s downfall which arguably caused /co/ to become more traditional with their picks.
No.179015
Anonymous
>>179012
>/co/ tournament went to shit
>/v/ tournaments became better
Fascinating
No.179017
Anonymous
Replies:>>179018
>>179015
on bizarro world
No.179018
Anonymous
>>179017
Which is our world and therefore true.
No.179020
Anonymous
Replies:>>179026
>>179012
>arguably caused /co/ to become more traditional with their picks.
It's arguable the actual finale that year was the traditional powerhouse face-off Toph vs. Raven, but Wuya and Eris were NSA's personal pet picks.
No.179026
Anonymous
Replies:>>179030
>>179020
So true plus4chanbro
No.179030
Anonymous
Replies:>>179032
>>179026
Are we now contesting this long-known fact that blew up here a year ago?
No.179032
Anonymous
>>179030
I don’t trust /tnt/ with the facts
No.179035
Anonymous
>>179015
… on planet retard.
No.179081
Anonymous
Replies:>>179083
Image:173928914819.png(1.78MB, 1179x1066)simpsons_loss.png
This argument sums up what’s wrong with /tnt/, denial of facts, absolutism, schizoposting, it’s all here. I have no idea why I’m still here.
No.179083
Anonymous
>>179081
I'm at a loss
No.179089
Anonymous
Replies:>>179090
Image:173929815969.png(188kB, 399x429)noodles.png
if fang wasn't hostrigged she'd be seen as a FOTM win on the same level as Dr. Mrs. the Monarch. her reception would skew more negative for the meta reasons discussed at length here, but she wouldn't have the slight stigma that monarch does of cockblocking better characters from her show.
in such a timeline, i believe the consensus ranking of winners would be Jenny>Frankie>Monarch>Fang>Betty>Wuya>Spinel
it is solely because of the fucked finals that Fang is down in * tier with Spinel. I know a lot of you weren't around to witness that in person, so trust me when I say that no shitshow since has even come close to the 2022 meltdown.
No.179090
Anonymous
>>179089
I don’t think Fang is solely FoTM boosted like monarch was. Monarch was a low level jobber until her show got canned which propelled her into winning. Fangs debut and only other tourney had her get 3rd place, losing to the winner by only 9 votes, and that was with like a year without any new primal stuff and only 5 episodes out at the time.
No.179091
Anonymous
Replies:>>179093
>>179090
whether she was actually FOTM boosted or not is a discussion for another time but people do definitely see it that way and that wouldn't change even if her win was legit
No.179092
Anonymous
>>179090
>Monarch was a low level jobber
nah, she was a solid midcard filter. The two years prior she lost R3 against Chel and Frankie. Had the cancellation never happened I could see her still getting an E8 at a future point.
Anyways NTA but I wouldn't call Fang's quite on the FOTM level as Monarch, but I do consider Fang FOTM-lite, in the sense she was from a big currently airing show and 2022 involved the week of her finale, and I don't think she'd pull off the same hype run and win any point afterwards. Take away the weird NSA shenanigans and it's a legit, incontestable win, just with some of the same meta reservations about her hype and novelty.
I would argue Jenny>Frankie>Monarch>Fang>Betty>Wuya>Spinel would still in fact be the main board ranking. Fang dropping decisively lower half will depend on if this year's winner is good.
No.179093
Anonymous
Replies:>>179094
>>179091
>people see it that way
People see what they want to see, we have people ITT claiming fang was an unpopular literal who. This is untrue and we have the data to show it, but it doesn’t stop them.
No.179094
Anonymous
Image:173930167168.png(389kB, 359x540)that's not the point.png
>>179093
do you understand what is being discussed here? because your responses give the impression that you do not.
No.179095
Anonymous
Image:173930207905.jpg(98kB, 640x829)something about breaking bucks.jpg
Everything about Fang's post-win meta and reception is basically just pic related; she was always a controversial contender, but the whole Ms. /co/ 2022 kerfuffle is what truly "legitimized" that status and gave people who disliked her since the beginning leverage in tournament discussion.
This is not me saying the controversy is unwarranted, but compare it to another winner like say, Wuya, which for all intents and purposes is a more evident example of a "host rig" but hasn't produced nearly as much bickering.
And why is that, you wonder? Because Wuya is not a fucking dinosaur, duh.
No.179096
Anonymous
Replies:>>179098
>>179095
you've got it backwards. people don't argue about wuya because there is nothing to argue about. as soon as NSA exposed everyone went "yeah wuya was rigged" even though there's no smoking gun that 100% confirmed it.
Fang's rig was a lot more explicit. NSA outright said she knew Shirley was rigged but let her into finals anyway, and she openly fucked with the results after voting had concluded. but people did and still do try to defend Fang despite it being as clear-cut as you can get. and some of the defenders may have been NSA, we know she has a penchant for astroturfing and she did make victory screens to go with her shuffled E8 placements.
No.179097
Anonymous
I just don't know why Fang gets people THAT mad. "Oh she's anti-coom, she's not a waifu, she was rigged" etc but who cares? She hasn't really left any lingering impact on the tournaments, she's not like Spinel or Batter where what she did changed the course of things for years ahead. It was a silly one-off happenstance.
No.179098
Anonymous
>>179097
See
>>179096
A rigged pick who ruined it for the waifufags
No.179099
Anonymous
The concept of the EE8 is stupid and will only bring harm to more champions than the asterisk already does. Let them rest in peace.
No.179102
Anonymous
/co/ needs to take notes from /v/. Traditional winners ruin these tournaments and make them less fun journeys.
No.179103
Anonymous
>>179095
Fang, basically, was dimes, and Wuya was not. People did care about Fang or at least got behind a huge two-year parade for her. Wuya is just low key, hardly noticeable as a winner so when the reveals came it wasn't "LMAO WTF RIGGED" it was just "oh fuck well i guess she was rigged."
No.179105
Anonymous
Replies:>>179112
>>179102
Anyway, here's to one more of bitching about the latest King of /v/ winner.
No.179106
Anonymous
Replies:>>179109
>>179103
Anons were already calling Wuya the best winner since Jenny before the OnlyFansArt stuff.
No.179107
Anonymous
>>179097
Knocking off a chance at a retiring a legit and conventional winner in a tourney that desperately needed one is a reason. But ehhhh, yeah that shit goes back to Spinel setting a weird standard for it. Had the ms. line-up been normal up to that point Fang probably would get seen as an entertaining oddball without as much seethe.
No.179108
Anonymous
Replies:>>179112
1. Frankie - Legit, honest win (+Larger votepool, more advanced meta, -E8 handicap)
2. Jenny - Legit, honest win (+No E8 handicap, -Smaller votepool, less advanced meta)
3. Boop - Technically legit, last one standing in the spitefest
4. Monarch - Semi-legit, pity bump
5. Wuya - Fraudulent, Hostrig
6. Fang - Fraudulent, Hostrig/Recency/Trololo (but sizable pool of genuine fans)
7. Spinel - Fraudulent, Peru/Recency/Trololo (smaller pool of genuine fans, subjectively more annoying)
No.179109
Anonymous
>>179106
That's more to do with how bad ms. /co/ is. Wuya got praise but it wasn't any big hype around her. She was a character that basically didn't belong past the midcard and stoked only modest enthusiasm outside NSA's astroturfing.
No.179110
Anonymous
>>179097
>but who cares?
you do, apparently
No.179112
Anonymous
>>179105
A meh winner is tolerable if people had a fun experience.
>>179108
Case in point, how many of these legit winners had entertaining threads
No.179113
Anonymous
>>179112
Every queen year was good except for 2024 and Loser's final 2023 and queen also has better winners than King
No.179114
Anonymous
>>179112
>refers to a line-up filled with oddball winners
No.179115
Anonymous
Replies:>>179118
>>179102
>>179112
King /v/'s idea of fun doesn't translate well to /co/ (or to Queen /v/ for that matter). And that's for the better imo cause I find most King /v/ antics and how they effect votes retarded.
No.179116
Anonymous
>>179102
No because then we get shit like Livesey who feels exactly like a /v/ pick.
No.179117
Anonymous
>>179103
That's certainly a better way of putting it. There was investment in Fang winning (which one can argue ties into her more contentious nature) whereas Wuya just sort of came and went, fitting for a character that was being astroturfed after all.
No.179118
Anonymous
Image:173930717166.jpg(17kB, 500x508)1730754315006959.jpg
>>179115
I'm gonna go for a longshot here and say that digits are a big reason why /co/ never gets as dumb as king of /v/. because on /co/, we actually have digits. dubs trips, quads, etc. and each level is increasingly rarer. so when someone successfully rolls, there's more weight to it. you can't get dubs and cancel out someone else's trips. so when a get establishes something, it sticks. there's more weight to it. everyone immediately recognizes "okay, this is what we're doing now".
/v/ only using the last digit to roll means every post is a 1/10 chance to derail. so, as expected, happenings will inevitably get derailed. and part of this is /v/ not being funny and making everything about rape, but when gets are so common there's no reason to accept anything else. /co/ RP isn't solely digit-based because good digits are hard to come by. it's a nice mix: you've got the getless RP that anons are free to accept or ignore, so only the stuff that passes peer review sticks. but there's always the slim possibility of digits to keep you on your toes. for example, the direction of the joker/gordon match was completely shifted because of quads. i don't think the gordon RPer would have cared if it was just "with this 7 Gordon stops raping the Joker and has a crisis of faith". in fact I know he wouldn't have cared, because he's me.
No.179123
Anonymous
Replies:>>179125
>>179118
Whys are digits disabled on /v/ anyways?
No.179125
Anonymous
>>179123
iirc it was to prevent anons from derailing threads with rolling for dubs, but it can still easily happen with singles, so it's really just a useless change.
No.179133
Anonymous
Image:173931482485.gif(757kB, 400x225) hankbb.gif
It still shocks me how we managed to find out NSA was OFA and a major rigger through a single discord nametag.
We literally were in the dark regarding who NSA really was, but that time he shared his nametag literally everything made sense.
No.179134
Anonymous
>>179133
>he
>his
We found out she was a girl too.
No.179136
Mr. Sir The Guymanbro !xNDnmYN2QQ
oh my goodness, oh my damn
oh my goodness- they goin H.A.M.

this is how bacon is supposed to be
the fries, they blend so perfectly
the cheese up in here is goin H.A.M.
dayum, dayum, DAYUM
No.179137
Anonymous
Replies:>>179140
>>179118
GETimus Prime >>> "If I get this number you GET RAPED!" with the ensuing replies of "OH NONONO ___keks" and "KWAB!!!"
No.179140
Anonymous
Replies:>>179144
>>179137
the only digits that should matter on /v/ are 00's or higher, and 92
No.179144
Anonymous
>>179140
92 is literally
>"If I get this number you GET RAPED!" with the ensuing replies of "OH NONONO ___keks" and "KWAB!!!"
except instead of "you get raped" it's "i get raped"
No.179145
Anonymous
Replies:>>179148
>>179144
I thought it was pretty funny when a combine officer posted "with this 5 Wario will get a cattle prod up his ass" and it backfired and he got a 92 instead
No.179147
Anonymous
Replies:>>179155
>>179102
>/co/ needs to take notes from /v/
We already had our /v/-esque tournament. It was called Ms /co/ 2019
No.179148
Anonymous
Replies:>>179149
>>179145
True, non-characters like Hex and Combine Officer needed to be taken down a peg,
No.179149
Anonymous
Replies:>>179161
>>179148
The combine officer that tells you to pick up that can is a real character, though.
No.179150
Anonymous
>>179144
92 is honestly fine since it's extremely harder to get compared to just normal digits and often doesn't benefit the poster
No.179151
Anonymous
Replies:>>179152
>>179144
92 is funnier cause it's specific. Single digit gets are kind of lame though.
No.179152
Anonymous
Replies:>>179153
>>179151
Oh yeah? If my post ends in a 2 your head explodes and is replaced with a big poopoo! :D
No.179153
Anonymous
>>179152
Vince...
No.179155
Anonymous
>>179147
Heroes of /co/ got pretty /v/ esque at times
No.179156
Anonymous
Replies:>>179158
>>179155
>/v/ doesn’t watch cartoons so they nominate, campaign and vote for literal fucking /a/ characters cuz “puppets are western guys!!!”
No.179158
Anonymous
>>179155
>>179156
The thing is that Heroes of /co/ was not long after the Heroes and Villains /v/ tournaments so /tnt/ still had the typical /v/ philosophy of "campaigns over characters" fresh on their minds. It's why you get things like a character who admittedly abuses rule technicalities (i.e. Shou Fu Kan) getting to E8 because of drawfagging, Popeye beating Harvey Birdman somehow being a controversial result, that brief doomfagging over Scooby-Doo in round 4, etc. Villains of /co/ was more in line with /co/ though, even if some characters like Voltar were pushing it.
No.179160
Anonymous
Replies:>>179162
Shou Fu Kan seems to get shit on a lot in retrospectives but I don't remember any controversy about him at the time. The biggest example of /tnt/ meta picks faggotry to me is still the mutineers getting in the finals of /cov/.
No.179161
Anonymous
Replies:>>179165
>>179149
a real faggot character I'll bet
No.179162
Anonymous
>>179160
I complained about Shou’s eligibility during the tournament and got dismissed by anons who voted for him solely for being a Torresanon pick and claiming he was “more heroic” than Hulk(?????).
No.179163
Anonymous
Replies:>>179172
>>179162
I'm not sure how people came to that conclusion even if they've never touched Hulk media. I think that's definitely an example of campaigning going to far to the point character stops mattering.
No.179165
Anonymous
>>179161
I'd love if the Goomba from Super Mario Bros. 1-1 qualified and got a campaign for something. Being the guy who's responsible for more gamer deaths than Mao was for real deaths is quite the accomplishment
No.179166
Anonymous
>>179133
It really was a near 1:1 on the moment hank found out. She was literally right our nose all this time.
No.179169
Anonymous
Replies:>>179171
>>179118
I never got the appeal of single digit GETs, there's nothing remotely impressive or interesting about some random fag saying "5 and rape", failing several times in a row before eventually rolling a single 1 in 10 digit
I remember Mr. /co/ 2020 had a lot of big GETs that were actually hype like with Tom smiting his opponents with quads and quints left and right, and even CHADimus Prime posters could at least get dubs/trips consistently even without trying. Wake me up when Battler rapes someone with quads or something, that would be an actual interesting happening instead of just the mindless spam that tends to take over threads past image limit
No.179171
Anonymous
>>179169
Transformers posting is funny because Optimus never fishes for digits, he just happens to get them on random posts. The Decepticons actually fish for dubs and usually never get them.
No.179172
Anonymous
Image:173939809116.png(463kB, 736x739)arthurcup.png
>>179162
>>179163
Genuinely what the fuck is even the point of having a rule like "character must be of Western /co/ origin" if "lax rules" are ultimately going to be enforced in the tournament and thus theoretically allowing ANYONE in the tournament regardless of source material? Why was the Nostalgia Critic shunned in Heroes of /a/ yet the /co/ tournament was perfectly fine with letting a character who was conceptualized by a Japanese creator from a series talked about more frequently on /a/ be a legitimate contender for "Hero of /co/"? I don't care if these are "fun, smaller tournaments," the rule of "character must come from [X]" is completely fucking redundant and worthless rule if the hosts are going to mindlessly allow anyone who either bends the rules or straight up shouldn't be allowed. Why have a filter if you're not going to enforce it?
No.179173
Anonymous
Replies:>>179174
>>179172
Imagine if someone took that one retard and his "Toonami ruling" babble seriously and we had Naruto or Goku competing in one of the /co/ tournaments.
No.179174
Anonymous
Replies:>>179176
>>179173
Goku STILL hasn't competed in a real tournament, even Bejita got i to Playboy
No.179176
Anonymous
Replies:>>179179
>>179174
Bejita was in Queen /a/ first
No.179179
Anonymous
>>179176
>The score is 2-0.
No.179193
Anonymous
>>179172
The one that kind of annoyed me in terms of “actually enforce it or not have it at all” was the /trash/ porn tournaments, with the rule of no loli or shota characters allowed*
*The host said this rule wasn’t even being applied at all and only put up to not get a ban, so a bunch of loli and shota characters could be nominated
No.179202
Anonymous
>>179193
/a/ bro....
No.179204
Anonymous
>>179193
/a/CHAD…….
No.179208
Anonymous
Replies:>>179219
>>179193
It was kind of a pointless rule, but I think it's mainly to apply to pre-pubescent characters. None of the "loli" and "shota" nominated was actually banned on /trash/. Rules and complaining is doubly pointless pointless cause none of them were even close to qualifying. Shou is a rather big deal cause the fucker got all the way to semifinals of heroes.
No.179219
Anonymous
Replies:>>179296
>>179208
>Semifinals
He lost in quarterfinals to Hank, but he got 5th place over Daredevil and Optimus Prime.
No.179296
Anonymous
>>179219
>but he got 5th place over Daredevil and Optimus Prime.
That’s some bullshit
No.180306
Anonymous
It really pisses me off how much NSA fucked over Fang’s legacy. The fucked up part is that Fang would have almost certainly won against Chel. The character with the most art of any singular character ever in the tourneys vs a girl who’s “OC” was getting shoved in a dude’s pooper. Considering how she was fucking steamrolling powerhouses like Raven, Chel would have been a non issue.

But NSA had to fuck everything up to prove a “point”. I’m still mad we couldn’t just have a fun afterparty because of her.
No.180407
Anonymous
Replies:>>180471
>>180306
I get NSA was going to taint Fang anyways with the OFA reveal, but I’m being honest, from the initial thread the rigging was revealed to this day i don’t get the meltdown over letting Shirley through. It seemed like typical Ms /co/ spitefest seethe
People were mad because… NSA didn’t disqualify a contestant like the rules didn’t allow and has never happened before? That doesn’t happen because the slope is so slippery if you openly disqualified someone. Chel lost and given even the rigging couldn’t save Shirley she effectively lost there too.
I still think the Shirley rigging group and anti-fangfags made it far bigger of a deal than it was because they were mad Fang was going to win and/or Shirley was called out for rigging and wasn’t going to win, so they kept spamming meltdowns to make it seem a bigger deal than it was.
And it worked. So really, all these tournaments have shown me is /co/ cannot handle the redpill of if something is rigged. If NSA said nothing there wouldn’t have even been any issue brought up. If anything is brought up doomerfags will make sure they try to ruin it all.
No.180471
Anonymous
Replies:>>181391
>>180407
Why the fuck wouldn't an openly declared rigged character moving forward be controversial? It ruins the overt validity of the contest. It would be controversial in any tournament.
I agree though that the best course of action would probably have been to just silently remove the rigged votes. That's on NSA's decision and I think it was poorly handled.
No.180951
Anonymous
>>180306
>The fucked up part is that Fang would have almost certainly won against Chel.
I still can't get over how Chel's perfect E8 attendance was broken by a character that didn't even exist before ms. /co/ 2024.
No.181015
Anonymous
Replies:>>181263
>>180951
Very dirty match, for multiple reasons, especially considering the controversy the round after.
Too bad basically zero tourneyheads care much for Chel. Despite being still the strongest non-winner in ms she has no winner hype whatsoever.
No.181263
Anonymous
Replies:>>181352
>>181015
Is Chel the Eggman of ms. /co/?
No.181352
Anonymous
>>181263
No, she's more like the Fio. Or, more accurately, Fio is the Chel of /v/.
No.181391
Anonymous
>>180471
Because the reverse, a host disqualifying a character, would have been far more controversial. Imagine the meltdowns then. The only winning move is to not announce anything, anons can’t handle the truth.
>>180951
To be fair the character she was against was not only FOTM but very likely the rigged character revealed next match. And she had a legendary spite falseflag campaign that round that likely came from the same group, people will see that in the future and get it was Ms 2019 esque
No.181392
Anonymous
>>181391
What makes you think Pomni fans were falseflagging Chel?
No.181393
Anonymous
>>181391
Fang also had an unfair FOTM boost in 2022. It's a disturbing pattern.
No.181394
Anonymous
>>181392
How quickly Tyr’ahnee was spited the next round and then after that when the controversy happened. It was clear Pomnifags weren’t playing clean if the controversy didn’t make it clear
And if you were there it was so obvious Chel was being falseflagged with the “‘meltdown”, it was a very classic Ms /co/ trick
No.181397
Anonymous
>>181391
>but very likely the rigged character revealed next match
That's basically what I was implying. Pomni seemed very sketchy in general last ms. /co/, but it didn't seem like something you could even bring up, similar to trying to critique Fang the year after her win: too big and popular with too many defenders ready to funpost you down.
For the record too i actually liked Pomni and think she would've made a cool E8 if people had just waited for this year. The run she had was too premature and controversial.
No.181398
Anonymous
>>181391
>>181394
What is this retarded fanfiction? Chel was getting faleseflagged since round 1 with her opponents getting AI art starting with Charlie. Rather than call it out, the one Chel post had her mocking the situation. Yet the meltdown was some epic ms. /co/ 4D chess move by Pomnifags…somehow.
No.181399
Anonymous
Replies:>>181404
>>181397
>people have to “wait their turn” in a popularity contest
No.181400
Anonymous
Replies:>>181406
>>181397
Sketchy how? As pointed out, Pomnifags couldn't have been falseflagging Chel since that was happening before their match up.
The closest angle I can think of is MD fans rallying behind Pomni to avenge their losses.
No.181403
Anonymous
>>181394
I'm not sure Pomnifags were behind the Chel shittery, but it certainly helped them.
Thing to keep in mind is ms. had a major zoomer vs. boomer things going on and Chel vs. Pomni was sort of a central focus considering what those two characters represent, which adds another layer of controversy to it. I think Tyr getting canned so hard was in response to that as well.
No.181404
Anonymous
Replies:>>181410
>>181399
I'm not saying people have to do anything, but as far as optimal circumstances go it could be a lot better. Pomni had two fucking eps. out, and now is the prime year for the show but she's benched while being overwhelmingly the most popular pick.
No.181406
Anonymous
Replies:>>181408
>>181400
>Sketchy how?
Were you not there for quarterfinals or what.
No.181408
Anonymous
>>181406
Were you not there when Chel was getting falseflagged since round 1 or what?
No.181410
Anonymous
>>181404
If she can get E8 with only two episodes, I'm sure she'll be fine when 2026 and the show is still in its peak.

If TADC fans were smart, they'd find some way to push for Gangle and Ragatha.
No.181411
Anonymous
Replies:>>181415
Weird how Kim got falseflagged and humiliated even harder than Chel yet she doesn’t get as much sympathy.
No.181412
Anonymous
Replies:>>181414
>>181410
The show will very likely be over a while by then
No.181414
Anonymous
Replies:>>181416
>>181412
Not likely; indie cartoons take longer to produce than studio cartoons despite having fewer episodes. For reference, Murder Drones lasted about four years with only 8 episodes and Helluva Boss is at 2 out of 4 seasons despite airing for 5 years.

At worst, the final episodes air in 2026 during the tournament and create another Primal situation.
No.181415
Anonymous
>>181411
Kim is just unnoticeable. Chel was unnoticeable too until people kept pointing out how she got three E8's, and now she's the booty powerhouse strongest of the E8's not to win so a bunch of spotlight is put on her.
No.181416
Anonymous
>>181414
Counterpoint: she can't be part of the EE8 now...
No.181452
Anonymous
Replies:>>181474
You can both think Pomni's run was sketchy in some aspects AND that her supportbase didn't actually have much to do with the Chel falseflagging.
No.181474
Anonymous
Replies:>>181478
>>181452
Chel falseflagging is one of the reasons why it was sketchy run. It’s Fang all over again but people are too afraid to speak up.
No.181477
Anonymous
Replies:>>181569
Pomni wouldn't be seen as sketchy if Perifag hadn't opened his mouth and he's full of shit anyways.

The boomer vs zoomer debate was probably more of a deciding factor in the later matches than anything else.
No.181478
Anonymous
>>181474
No, the Chel stuff had been going on since practically the beginning of the tournament, to the point people have wondered if it was a (failed) attempt at making an anti-campaign instead of just a falseflag. We are not rewriting history here.
No.181516
Anonymous
Replies:>>181518
>>181391
>>181392
>>181394
>>181397
>Pomnifags were falseflagging a character they didn’t even know they would go up against since the stwrt of the tournament because…… because they just were okay!?!?!?!?
No.181518
Anonymous
Replies:>>181538
>>181516
I'm talking about the RIGGING faggot, stop quoting me.
No.181538
Anonymous
Replies:>>181556
>>181518
That's still retarded since you're taking the word of Perispammer of all people.
No.181556
Anonymous
>>181538
I thought the suspicion mainly came from her losing by like 3 votes with a 100+ votes removed.
No.181569
Anonymous
Replies:>>181573
>>181477
The thing is, Pomni would have been figured out regardless even if that fag never said a thing in those threads because it was against Tyr, the character known to be openly spited by them for beating their tranny character years ago
They aren’t really discrete. People would have known as soon as Tyr was being rigged against who it was
No.181573
Anonymous
Replies:>>181582
>>181569
>the character known to be openly spited by them for beating their tranny character years ago
What the fuck are you even talking about? Pomni, much less Pomnifags, didn't even exist until October 2023. And now you're implying Jucika rigged against Tyr?
No.181576
Anonymous
Replies:>>181582
I can't even parse what "tranny" character is being referred to since people accuse several characters of being trans.
No.181582
Anonymous
>>181573
>>181576
I think he's referring to Tyr beating Peridot years ago.
No.181586
Anonymous
Replies:>>181588
>>181582
He is. Perifag swore he would continue to spite Tyr or something like that.
No.181587
Anonymous
>>181582
What makes him think TADC fans have anything to do with SU characters? This is fucking retarded and all because some funposter claimed he rigging with no proof.
No.181588
Anonymous
>>181586
Would have switched over to Chel had she won her match?
No.181597
Anonymous
Pomni beating Chel in R4 last year felt like one of those typical weird ms. /co/ surprise things that wasn't supposed to happen and exists cause the tourney is in an alt universe vortex caused by Spinel years ago. Conventionally, Pomni bows out midcard at a respectful 4th round against a powerhouse like Kinger did, and getting E8 should've been this year. Chel gets 4th E8, has a classics face-off third rematch with Tyr and then the finale is a classics Frankie vs. Tyr/Chel. Instead Pomni won and sent the rest of the tourney on a weird course with rigging, Tyr getting annihilated somehow, and the odd finalist of Jucika.
No.181603
Anonymous
>>181597
If you think about it, even the oomer debate can be traced back to Spinel winning.
No.181608
Anonymous
>>181597
Pomni is fun, and had a really good campaign. Whatever Chel had was basically an anti-campaign.
No.181609
Anonymous
Replies:>>181615
>>181597
We are not calling Jucika an "odd" finalist now when she was an E8 veteran already.
No.181615
Anonymous
>>181609
She still sucks and is not winners material at all.
No.181617
Anonymous
Replies:>>181621
>>181615
She would have been a terrible winner but her getting far isn't totally unexpected in hindsight and after seeing Queen that year, there could have been worse.
No.181618
Anonymous
>>181615
Alright, but she falls completely in line with /co/'s taste and is a popular pick dunno why people can't grasp these categories aren't mutually exclusive.
No.181621
Anonymous
>>181617
Ayla would've been a much better Queen than Jucika a Ms. imo.
No.181623
Anonymous
>>181621
I was actually referencing shit like Hex and Miku; it would have been more embarrassing if we let a background character or an /a/ character get that far.
You are right about Ayla though.
No.181628
Anonymous
>>181621
There are better representatives of Chrono Trigger than Ayla.
No.181629
Anonymous
>>181621
Ayla benefitted from an easy bracket with underdog momentum (Gacha meme, Alice fatigue, Morrigan is le boring silent, Tifa spite, and barely won against Palutena) and Toriyama pity ngl. She would've sucked in hindsight.
No.181632
Anonymous
>>181391
>Because the reverse, a host disqualifying a character, would have been far more controversial.
I really don't think it would be, because NSA actually showed us the votes for that one. People in the threads saw it and agreed that Shirley was being rigged.
No.181633
Anonymous
>>181629
I honestly don't get the Tifa spite when she actually got some campaigning that tournament.
No.181635
Anonymous
Replies:>>181642
>>181633
The Princess vs. Tifa match was extremely fucking close and Spideranon's graph showed an uptick of votes at the last minute so Princessfags were mostly accusing Tifa of rigging.
No.181638
Anonymous
>>181391
>Because the reverse, a host disqualifying a character, would have been far more controversial.
Really only if the character is cared about. I don't think hardly anyone gave a fuck about Shirley then. It was a surprise she even qualified. The real problem with DQ characters for rigging is how it sets the precedent for hosts simply removing picks under that guise, or people mock rigging a character for the purpose of getting them DQ'd, whicj i think is the real reason stats didn't DQ Emmy yars prior.
But even if your point is conceded it doesn't change that an openly rigged character moving forward is understandably gonna be a shitfest. Especially if that character goes all the way to finals lol.
No.181642
Anonymous
>>181633
Tifa carried baggage of being a silent boring majooner rep plus getting stomped by Reimu and havig some fag seethe about it a bunch. She was en route to shake off her old rep. but then she beat Princess and on top of what >>181635 said Princess was basically the premier super vocal thread favorite so it rubbed princessfags extra bad when Tifa in particular was the one that took her out.
No.181645
Anonymous
Jucika is /co/ culture.
No.181654
Anonymous
Replies:>>181655
>chelfags are saying they were rigged out now
Lmao
No.181655
Anonymous
>>181654
No one said that. Also Chelfags don't exist.
No.181658
Anonymous
Replies:>>181833
Image:173991869447.jpg(110kB, 901x917)soon.jpg
>>181410
gangle's focus episode dropped the ball and only steers and queers like ragatha
zooble and the sun are gonna have to carry
No.181833
Anonymous
>>181658
>zooble
I honestly don't see it
No.181920
Anonymous
>this entire thread
I’m starting to think that 24/7 tourney discourse is bad for your mental health
No.181921
Anonymous
Replies:>>181936
>>181920
I think it's more those already autistic and/or mentally unsound are attracted to tourney discourse.
No.181929
Anonymous
Replies:>>181931
>>181920
>you now remember last year's controversial tournament opinion threads
No.181931
Anonymous
>>181929
We should make a /co/ All-Stars/EE8 Tournament Speculation/Waiting Room #2 after this one.
No.181934
Anonymous
This doesn’t work not only because tournaments (especially Ms) were so fucked with meta and rigging over the years, but because also the Elite 8 itself, namely that characters were barred from participating after their Elite 8 and not making it a proper all-star lineup
No.181936
Anonymous
>>181920
>>181921
Kind of a chicken or the egg situation innit?
No.181942
Anonymous
Replies:>>181974
No.181965
Anonymous
>>181615
Slappy….
No.181969
Anonymous
Replies:>>181974
>>181934
E8 is like the only thing most people agree on lol
No.181974
Anonymous
>>181942
Unironically don’t know what this is referring to
>>181969
People like Elite 8 and this isn’t related to that, but when it was conceived even back in 2018 it was mentioned that it has a purpose in preventing tournaments becoming solely popularity ranking contests (as in year 1 is the greatest /co/ guy, year 2 is the second greatest, etc) by staggering strong performers
Hence a true, proper “all-stars” of the best can’t ever truly happen since they never faced over every year. The closest we’d get to that, and arguably the real all-stars contests, were the 2018 tournaments
No.181983
Anonymous
>>181974
The 73.6% refers to the vote share in favor of keeping the E8, you'd know that if you paid attention
No.182037
Anonymous
Replies:>>182050
>>181974
I don't think it's meant to be a literal all-stars, that's just a potential name. It's a winner's tourney is all. An all stars wouldn't be possible even without the E8 rule imo, considering meta trends. Likely an E8 would not reach E8 the following year. In a way the E8 rule actually helps the powerhouses by not having them become too stale to the returning voterbase.
No.182046
Anonymous
Replies:>>183132
>>181974
>The closest we’d get to that, and arguably the real all-stars contests, were the 2018 tournaments
Black Canary bro's, we're one of the STRONGEST after all.
For real tho i think the closest to a true all stars would be an aggregate calculation similar to what that tier chart anon did.
No.182050
Anonymous
>>182037
Something something “we won’t have a noble nine situation!”

I hate how the debate over E8 nearly eclipsed finals, just because one guy wouldn't shut up about it.
No.182408
Anonymous
Replies:>>182424
There is nothing wrong with voting for coom; it's more integral and honest than campaigning
It should not be seen as lazy
Chel should have been crowned instead of Fang
No.182424
Anonymous
>>182408
I know you're probably just taking what I said and making it inflammatory but I wanna be clear, campaigning in the mode of the character is fine. Honest campaigning is fine.
I just think it's weird people will wank some crazy ooc shit while holding the sentiment that coom posting should be voted against.
No.182434
Anonymous
>>182424
Both should be voted against. Also that's literally just a king thing; no one goes overboard and wanks OOC shit harder than king.
No.182446
Anonymous
Replies:>>182450
>>182424
I'm kind of scared to ask what counts as "honest campaigning" or "mode of the character" considering how anal ms. gets.
This coom and campaign debates are so stupid.
No.182450
Anonymous
Replies:>>182465
>>182446
Just normal shit that showcases the character as they are.
No.182465
Anonymous
Replies:>>182482
>>182424
>>182450
This is why coom gets a bad wrap though; a lot of porn erases the actual personality characters have for generically sexy. Chel's huckster personality never gets featured.
Perhaps we need in character coom just as much as we need in character campaigns.
No.182479
Anonymous
Who are you people and why are we having this conversation?
No.182482
Anonymous
>>182465
Thing is appearance is also part of the character. It's completely "in-character" if a sexy character is campaigned with their sex appeal.
No.182495
Anonymous
Replies:>>182514
>>182482
Frankie isn't even designed to be sexy outside the black dress; the sex appeal comes more from her caretaking personality. Characters like that would be OOC if you campaigned solely on sex appeal.
No.182499
Anonymous
Replies:>>182514
>>182482
Why are you so afraid of personality in your porn.
No.182508
Anonymous
Replies:>>182522
Since we're just regurgitating /v/ opinions from the other thread I'm just going to bring up what another guy said; genuinely liking a character and fapping to them are different things. When those things overlap, you get good winners like Jenny and Frankie.
No.182514
Anonymous
>>182495
Well that and she's a redhead with the voice and the whole Mac /ss/ thing.
It's besides the point though. Design is part of the character, and a sexy design is a valid character campaign and voting reason.
>>182499
I'm not making any statement at all about my own preferences. Just the logic of coom/anti-coom.
No.182521
Anonymous
Replies:>>182531
>>182514
The logic is sound, coom fags are silent shitters that demand their characters go to the top simply because they're sexy.
If it was such a valid campaign and voting reason, they would get farther.
No.182522
Anonymous
>>182508
Maybe it's just a semantics issue.
When people use "character" they often conflate that exclusively with personality. But a "character" is also their design.
What the debate's really about is evaluating personality vs. looks in the worth of a character. Particularly female characters cause I don't think people are nearly as harsh or scrutinizing about voting a male character for looking cool or something.
No.182526
Anonymous
Replies:>>182801
>>182514
>the whole Mac /ss/ thing
But…that's OOC…
No.182529
Anonymous
>>182482
Yeah, but a character's appearance shouldn't erase their characterization or what's more, a character's sexual appeal shouldn’t be built on off-model porn. This is what you should be preaching if you believe in honest campaigning.
No.182531
Anonymous
Replies:>>182536
>>182521
They do in fact often go far and get to the top. I just think people are over-reactive about it. Design is essential to a character. They get far on looks appeal then whatever, it's an honest reason from the majority.
No.182534
Anonymous
Where were all of the coom voters during playgirl? It was a ghost town this year compared to 2023
No.182536
Anonymous
Replies:>>182542
>>182531
>Shitty reasons are okay if they're """honest"""
Yeah, Frankie's campaign should have used more Mac /ss/.
No.182538
Anonymous
Replies:>>182548
>>182529
You voted for Fang didn't you?
No.182541
Anonymous
>>182534
Furries pushed us out.
No.182542
Anonymous
Replies:>>182547
>>182529
I never said off-model was okay, I've only been bringing up character design.
>>182536
I don't think it's shitty, it's fine because it's honest and part of the character. Is it more shallow than personality? Probably. But I'm not gonna fucking mald over it. It goes back to remembering it's a fucking board tournament and if a character is naturally famous for something then fine.
No.182547
Anonymous
Replies:>>182557
>>182542
Fang was naturally famous for being a dinosaur and yet she got the most shit from people who vote for sexy character designs.
No.182548
Anonymous
Replies:>>182560
>>182538
Ad hominem. Nigger, I'm just working by the logic of the origimal argument about "showcasing characters for who they are".
No.182550
Anonymous
>>182534
I was all geared up to campaign but every pick of mine got squashed and it turned into a furfest which i just don't care for. Playboy was more popular probably mostly cause there was more time to advertise and people knew what to expect.
No.182552
Anonymous
I'm beginning to think something that would "decide" the best and worst winners is a really bad idea, if this thread is any indicator of things
No.182556
Anonymous
>>182552
>he is just now realizing
No.182557
Anonymous
>>182547
Fang had a big ironical meme element that went in hand with her being a dinosaur and so anti-coom. But that's not really what she gets the most shit for anyways.
No.182560
Anonymous
>>182548
Oh yeah, you voted for Fang.
No.182562
Anonymous
Replies:>>182567
>>182552
Pretty all /co/ controversies have exclusively to do with the ms. side, including this debate about "character." Waifu's are drama.
No.182564
Anonymous
Replies:>>182569
>>182557
And there it is. Voting for a character solely for sex appeal is good and honest but voting for a dinosaur you find cool is memey and anti coom.
No.182566
Anonymous
Replies:>>182569
>>182557
You are just proving his point
No.182567
Anonymous
>>182562
Literally just the anti coomers that cause problems and keep pushing for campaigns.
No.182569
Anonymous
>>182564
>>182566
I'm saying the reasons for some were memey and anti-coom. That element was obviously there to a degree and is against the honest part of character voting.
No.182573
Anonymous
Replies:>>182579
>>182569
>for some
And there we go again with the generalizations. Some people did it for the memes so now no one had genuine reasons to vote for her. As disingenuous as saying that Frankie was only voted for being hot.
No.182575
Anonymous
Replies:>>182586
>>182569
Is honest character voting what you decide or is coom just the only honest way of doing it.
No.182577
Anonymous
I wish Granny from Looney Tunes would qualify. She's hilarious, and feels like a perfect fit for "funny and iconic cartoon lady"
No.182579
Anonymous
>>182573
That's the opposite of generalizing you tard. At no point am I saying Fang is only voted for that reason, I specifically say SOME. Because that element did exist and the overall novelty and hype of her run was part of what got her so powerful. The point is she was far from just "naturally famous for being a dinosaur" and some of the shit she got about being anti-coom i think is right.
No.182581
Anonymous
Replies:>>182583
>>182577
Do you like her design?
No.182582
Anonymous
Replies:>>182584
>>182577
Why do you fags hate coom so much.
No.182583
Anonymous
Replies:>>182593
>>182581
Yes? It works as "silly old lady". I'm not jerking off to her if that's what you're asking, I just think it's funny when she beats Sylvester's ass with a newspaper
No.182584
Anonymous
Replies:>>182588
>>182577
>>182582
I was about to make a sarcastic joke about voting for Granny being anti-coom but I guess you beat me to it kek
No.182586
Anonymous
Replies:>>182590
>>182575
Honest is voting for the character for the character. Does that really need to be spelled out for you at this point?
No.182588
Anonymous
>>182584
What sarcastic joke? You fags always pull this shit whenever Gang or sexy women come up. It's tiring.
No.182589
Anonymous
>>182588
>Gang
A bloods vs crips tournament? A daring proposition...
No.182590
Anonymous
Replies:>>182598
>>182586
>Does that really need to be spelled out for you at this point?
Yet when people say they vote for Fang for the character, people start butting in about how it was only for the novelty and for the anti coom and whatever.
When people said they voted for Toph, they were accused of being lolifags when they just liked the character.
Why is voting for the character in question when it isn't a conventionally attractive character?
No.182591
Anonymous
Replies:>>182593
>>182588
You realize hat giving any reason for voting for a female character that has nothing to do with her design is automatically perceived as anti-coom meta by you, right.
No.182593
Anonymous
>>182583
>>182591
So you admit that Granny was only picked for the novelty of having an old lady character in the tournament. It's a simple question to answer.
No.182594
Anonymous
Replies:>>182600
I vote for female characters for many aspects than just personality. Design, looks, quality of their shows, or style. Design and cool/cute factor can trump the lacking personalities if the show is enjoyable to watch. If it looks like an eyesore or the show is shit then I will shit on it and never vote for them despite the campaign.
No.182598
Anonymous
Replies:>>182617
>>182590
>people start butting in about how it was only for the novelty and for the anti coom and whatever.
That it was an ELEMENT and that SOME voted along those lines.
>Why is voting for the character in question when it isn't a conventionally attractive character?
It isn't, just when it becomes an apparent meta element.
The issue is really far more visible on the opposite end, with all the vocal hatred about coom or coom-only voting, I'm just trying to clear up there isn't anything basically dishonest about that and I don't think it's worth seething over so much or actively spiting against. It feels kind of weird and meta that people do get so worked up against it.
No.182599
Anonymous
>>182593
No it's because I've seen at minimum over 200 Looney tunes shorts, own Six volumes of the Golden collection on DVD and the first two volumes of the new collector's choice sets. My favorite was that one where she was a rich widow, and using giants wads of cash as kindling. None of the girl cartoon characters that qualify are funny except Slappy Squirrel, but Animaniacs sucks dick I'm not watching a garbage show for the 5 minute segments that are actually good.
No.182600
Anonymous
>>182594
Fang Gang…we got called the fuck out…
No.182603
Anonymous
Replies:>>182613
Weird how he went from "it's just a tournament whatever" to get serious about meta the more people pressed him on Fang.
No.182605
Anonymous
Replies:>>182607
>>182599
I take.it back, Pomni is funny but is in the E8, and Lola is funny but I've only seen LTS as clips.
No.182607
Anonymous
>>182599
>>182605
Not beating the novelty allegations
No.182609
Anonymous
Replies:>>182612
>>182593
Can't tell if this is a strawman falseflag or if this person is genuinely upset.
No.182612
Anonymous
Replies:>>182614
>>182609
You really can't pull that card when people still get upset when people call Fang novelty and anti-coom.
No.182613
Anonymous
No.182614
Anonymous
Replies:>>182621
>>182612
But you are the one getting upset over someone merely bringing up a character that hasn't even qualified for any tournament?
No.182617
Anonymous
>>182598
I see more people getting worked up over "coom" picks given we have this same conversation anytime mentioned that dinosaur. Coom has now become a meta.
No.182621
Anonymous
>>182614
Follow the conversation you tard.
No.182622
Anonymous
>>182617
>I see more people getting worked up over "coom" picks
I don't.
Coom is just coom.
No.182624
Anonymous
>>182622
Which is better than voting for a dinosaur or little girls.
No.182626
Anonymous
Replies:>>182631
>>182617
The current meta I'm sensing here is how giving any reason for voting for a female character that is unrelated to their potential sexual appeal (not really visual design in itself btw) makes it anti-waifu/anti-coom. Which shouldn't be happening at all 'cause you can favorite a character without fapping or considering it your waifu.
No.182627
Anonymous
>>182622
I think he meant coomers are getting defensive on behalf of their picks from a perceived anti coom sentiment.
No.182631
Anonymous
Replies:>>182642
>>182626
But…this is the waifu contest.
No.182633
Anonymous
Image:174003828929.jpg(38kB, 589x589)d83.jpeg
You know, multiple times now I express opinion and some fag runs a strawman with it to stir up shit and basically invalidate me even talking about it reasonably.
Fuck that guy.
No.182636
Anonymous
>>182633
Same. I swear it's the opposite side doing this to silence people.
No.182640
Anonymous
Replies:>>182646
>>182633
Honestly fuck everyone here. This is just a popularity contest for anons a basket weaving forum; no matter where you stand, it's not that deep.
No.182642
Anonymous
Replies:>>182655
>>182631
Unofficially yeah, but voting habits are like that because casual male nerdom usually doesn't think about female characters in any termss deeper than "waifu". Getting worked up over other people *honestly* voting for a character for a variety of other reasons is just stupid.
No.182646
Anonymous
Replies:>>182654
>>182640
Sometimes I wanna make a civil analysis you know? It's like piecing apart sports or something. But then some people are set on lowering discourse as much as possible.
No.182654
Anonymous
Replies:>>182656
>>182646
>Sometimes I wanna make a civil analysis you know? It's like piecing apart sports or something.
Nigga it's a contest about picking which is the best female cartoon character; it's about as deep as picking your favorite on American Idol. It’s this analysis shit that makes these things such a slog.
No.182655
Anonymous
>>182642
I think there's a fairly simple dsitinction between meta and character-primary voting and that basically distinguishes "honest" voting. That's never been that deep. The debating always just comes down to differing attitudes about what or how much of a character tourney it is.
No.182656
Anonymous
Replies:>>182673
>>182654
>picking which is the best female cartoon character
That's literally where all the debate comes from lol. Sometimes it's not about that, sometimes there's differing standards about that.
No.182661
Anonymous
Replies:>>182663
All I got from this conversation is that voting for characters on shit like /ss/ is somehow less dishonest than campaigning,
No.182663
Anonymous
Replies:>>182667
>>182661
Reading comprehension has always been a /tnt/ weakness.
No.182667
Anonymous
Replies:>>182672
>>182663
So has been formulating good arguments but I suppose that's just plain /co/ rather than the scapegoat site.
No.182672
Anonymous
Replies:>>182677
>>182667
I go over basic shit repeatedly and someone here will still misconstrue it. You are just pea-int.
No.182673
Anonymous
>>182656
It's literally all there is about that. Differing standards just needlessly complicates simple contests.
Whoever wins, wins. That's that.
No.182677
Anonymous
Replies:>>182683
>>182672
Or maybe you just suck at not sounding like a stuck up asshole?
No.182679
Anonymous
>>182673
>Whoever wins, wins. That's that.
Sure but we have shit like Spinel which pretty much everyone will trash so eh...
No.182681
Anonymous
>>182673
But anon... Spinel won...
No.182682
Anonymous
I think this needs repeating; tournaments should be a monthly thing on the main board only. Constant analysis and arguments over beauty contests is not good for you.
No.182683
Anonymous
Replies:>>182686
Image:174003987572.png(251kB, 680x845)6ja3h0.png
>>182677
Or maybe you should graduate high school.
No.182686
Anonymous
Replies:>>182689
>>182683
>unironically using gigachad images
Big talk coming from a middle schooler
No.182688
Anonymous
>it has now devolved into schoolyard taunts over who's the best at debating a 4chin contest
/tnt/ everybody
No.182689
Anonymous
Replies:>>182691
Image:174004022389.jpg(100kB, 659x753)GMNgIG4XIAAM2t7.jpg
>>182686
The ironical part is it's pretty ironical and you are further exposed for lacking comprehension.
No.182691
Anonymous
>>182689
>being retarded on purpose is ironic while posting le chad image
Not beating the underaged allegations.
No.182695
Anonymous
Replies:>>182696
So anyways.
Let's complete the EE8 with a good winner yeah?
No.182696
Anonymous
>>182695
So not Fang then
No.182697
Anonymous
Replies:>>182699
>>182696
Fang already won.
No.182698
Anonymous
Replies:>>182702
>>182696
>FANGFANGFANG
Fang already won.
No.182699
Anonymous
Replies:>>182701
>>182697
The debate is literally about that.
No.182701
Anonymous
Replies:>>182702
>>182699
...no one is debating the reality than Fang won, anon.
No.182702
Anonymous
Replies:>>182705
>>182698
>>182701
It's a widely known fact that Fang was not a clean winner
No.182705
Anonymous
Replies:>>182706
>>182702
That doesn't change that she won.
Or that Spinel and Wuya won.
They're on the chart. They're winners. There's no revoking that really.
No.182706
Anonymous
Replies:>>182707
>>182705
It can be debated. Like we’ve been doing. It’s productive to talk about these things.
No.182707
Anonymous
>>182706
Nobody's been doing that.
Do you ever stop with this retard shit man.
No.182710
Anonymous
Replies:>>182713
To poke some holes into the earlier points, saying voting for looks is more honest is a dishonest statement; people could have never seen a show let alone have attachment to it yet they still vote for girls they find hot, which is about the same as voting on campaigns.
Speaking of which, mr., ms., and queen up until 2024 have always preferred in character RPs and shit on king for going overboard so bringing up OOC campaigns comes off as whataboutism.
>but Fang
If there's no generalization, then some shouldn't cancel out the genuine personality fags.
No.182713
Anonymous
>>182710
Missing a fundamental point I think. Hotness found inherent in a character is the character. So I wouldn't say it's the same as voting for something purely on thread meta lines.
It goes back to conflating "character" entirely with "personality." Character design is part of the character and can be a major part of their legacy alone.
No.182715
Anonymous
>>182713
Is the hotness inherent when we are only going off anatomically incongruent, off-model fanart though.
It's not unreasonable to call, let's say, someone who only votes for Frankie due to inflation porn dishonest.
No.182716
Anonymous
Replies:>>182718
>>182713
Character with no personality is just a design. I've fapped to dozens of OCs but I wouldn't say they were my favorite character or if they even had a character.
If you're voting purely on looks with no regard to their personality, show of origin or if you have any personal attachment to them, sorry not sorry, that is exactly the same as voting for thread meta lines. Horny is its own meta.
No.182717
Anonymous
Replies:>>182721
>>182715
We touched on off model art before but this brings up what happened in Queen. Even setting aside the artist, Hex Maniac's biggest claim to fame was having an attractive design that generated lots of porn; as a trainer class, she is literally not a a character. It was widely agreed that she was a terrible E8 and would have made a worse winner.
No.182718
Anonymous
>>182715
Off-model is dishonest, sure.
>>182716
No, it's not the same. Meta denotes something to do with the tourney or threads that has no relation to the inherent qualities of the character separate from it. A design and its appeal is in fact a quality of the character, an essential one in fact.
No.182720
Anonymous
>>182718
Design and appeal don't always have to do with sexual appeal. You can find appealing designs in a variety of ways…like a dinosaur.
No.182721
Anonymous
Replies:>>182724
>>182717
Hex is a weird case cause it's the off-model porn fame + the extremely prolific drawfag push. And the drawfag in question did draw Hex with big boobies but peculiarly avoided actually doing porn of her, instead made it a big self-inserty OC thing, so it was doubly dishonest in a weird way. Just a shitty pick all around.
No.182722
Anonymous
Replies:>>182726
>>182718
You're arguing semantics when the net effect is still the same. Just because it explicitly doesn't have to do with the tournament doesn't make it less shallow than meta shit. Can you really say you're being honest when you vote for a character you don't know or care for outside of looks? Would you really say that Hex Maniac is a good E8 and potential Champion?
No.182723
Anonymous
>>182720
Sure. But coom appeal gets shit on a lot, and is the usual focus of this debate.
Main point is inherent design appeal isn't an invalid reason for liking a character, hence is an acceptable vote and campaign. That's what I've been trying to get at.
No.182724
Anonymous
>>182721
It's a case of getting it from both ends and an example of both negative extremes.
No.182725
Anonymous
>>182723
I was getting the impression the focus of the debate was that voting for a character OTHER than coom was a form of meta, what's with the guy previously calling anyone who argued against that "anti-coom" just a few posts above.
No.182726
Anonymous
>>182722
We're not discussing shallowness. It's about voting for the character as the character. Design is a character vote, even if it can be called a shallow one.
Hex doesn't make sense as an example since she's usually an off-model fanart fanfiction vote. In fact, Hex is basically the poster character for that.
No.182727
Anonymous
Replies:>>182731
>>182723
It's a flawed premise since it doesn't take into account whether the people actually know the character and her source material; look at how much the actual source material gets discussed and is usually just as loved as the character. So a potential champion who only has a looks going for comes off as hollow and insincere.
No.182729
Anonymous
>>182725
No, that's retarded and that anon's a funposter.
No.182730
Anonymous
Replies:>>182734
>>182725
Likewise, voting for design appeal isn't inherently bad in and of itself. If it's just one part of the reason you like the character, that's perfectly fine. If your vote starts and ends with they're hot, that is no better than or any less shallow then campooning.
No.182731
Anonymous
Replies:>>182735
>>182727
Liking the character based on design is still liking the character, it's liking an inherent quality of that character. It's not liking the character fully, but it's still the character. A shallow win? sure. I don't see how that's insincere though.
No.182732
Anonymous
>>182723
>hence is an acceptable vote and campaign.
>"This character is hot. I know nothing other than them being hot. Vote for them."
Great campaign you got there.
No.182734
Anonymous
Replies:>>182737
>>182730
Again, the debates not about shallowness, anon. It's voting for the character in some regard vs. voting for a character based on a regard unrelated to them, i.e. meta. The former is still more valid than the latter in a character tournament since it's about a character's quality.
No.182735
Anonymous
Replies:>>182736
>>182731
If you don't care about the source material or the rest of the character as whole, it's pretty insincere. People wouldn't vote for Frankie as champion if they didn't like Foster's to begin with.
No.182736
Anonymous
Replies:>>182738
>>182735
If the criteria is just that you like the character and prefer them over another and design does that for you then it's a sincere vote. Don't know why you're bringing up Frankie, never said she was just a coomvote or whatever
No.182737
Anonymous
Replies:>>182740
>>182734
In addition to having a very weird definition of character, you misunderstand the point of campaigning.
The campaign is supposed to show why we should give a shit about your character by showing off their best qualities. I can't exactly praise much off attractiveness, which is where a campaign would come in if I didn't already know them.
No.182738
Anonymous
>>182736
She's just one random example numb nuts, I could have used any other winner. Design being the edging out factor is one thing but not many would find it sincere if it was just looks alone.
No.182739
Anonymous
Replies:>>182743
Why is it that neither mr. nor queen get caught up in these retarded arguments about design and sincerity. Amaterasu takes the form of the wolf yet no one ever questions why she makes E8.
No.182740
Anonymous
>>182737
If a campaign does that it's fine, that's a showcase of character. I'm speaking in regard to the "vote just for the campaign/being vocal" kind of attitude (campoon, whatever).
And there's nothing weird about design being part of the character. It's literally fundamental. Again, it seems people conflate "character" entirely as "personality."
No.182742
Anonymous
Replies:>>182744
>>182740
People have been saying the two concepts are linked you jackass; literally cannot have one without the other. This isn't a debate with most waifufags because they know the concepts and inherently linked,
No.182743
Anonymous
>>182739
There are several Queen characters that get trashed for just being coom picks.
No.182744
Anonymous
Replies:>>182748
>>182742
I know they're linked. That's fucking obvious. I'm saying the fault is in their being entirely conflated as only being each other. Design is part of a character, as is the character's personality.
No.182745
Anonymous
Replies:>>182750
>>182740
>I'm speaking in regard to the "vote just for the campaign/being vocal" kind of attitude (campoon, whatever).
For the fiftieth fucking time, that's not an attitude held in /co/ tournaments; they get called silent tournaments because such attitudes get frowned on heavily.
We're not king tier autists who worship campaign above all else.
No.182746
Anonymous
>>182743
Queen has their own equivalent of Fangfags? Bummer.
No.182748
Anonymous
Replies:>>182751
>>182744
And voting for one over the other isn't good either way. Characters like Jenny and Frankie are the bridge between silent shitters and picks like EVE and Muriel.
No.182749
Anonymous
>>182743
They're just a cover for the real reason; they're hated for being neither lolies or shorstacks.
No.182750
Anonymous
Replies:>>182752
>>182745
Doesn't matter. You're asserting in a post i reply to that looks voting is no better than "campooning," which I think is wrong I tell you why, the design is ultimately still part of the character, an inherent quality of it.
No.182751
Anonymous
>>182748
...How is voting like EVE invalid in any way? You are aware she has been a waifu character for years, right?
No.182752
Anonymous
>>182750
Just admit you don't watch cartoons already.
No.182753
Anonymous
Replies:>>182757
>>182751
Her design is purposefully simple and minimalist. It works for what it is and it’s cute but I can understand why people would pass over her for characters with more eye catching designs.
No.182754
Anonymous
I think we need to start voting during Mr /co/ solely for coom potential also if that's the criteria people really want for these tournaments
No.182755
Anonymous
>>182751
Not a traditional waifu
No.182756
Anonymous
>>182754
Isn't it funny how design rarely comes up in mr. and how the main focus is who you'd want to hang out with?
No.182757
Anonymous
Replies:>>182758
>>182753
You are still taking the visual design into account. Without reiterating what >>182720 said, it might not be conventionally sexy but it's still cute and endearing.
No.182758
Anonymous
>>182757
The topic was about coom appeal specifically. EVE isn't the right look for a contest like ms.
No.182759
Anonymous
If a character is famous and gets far cause of coom then that's fine. That's a valid legacy for the board. So is a character getting far cause of personality. Or any combo of character traits. It's a character tourney. It gets gay when it starts becoming meta though and people vote for shit that's got nothing to do with a character outside a tournament context. That's all.
No.182760
Anonymous
Replies:>>182763
>>182759
Why is this only applicable to ms.? Why is it that this character/design philosophy and "legacy of coom is valid" gets thrown when it comes to the male tournament?
No.182761
Anonymous
>>182758
See this is exactly why you guys get shit. People are not against "coom" or whatever, they are against (you) giving others shit for voting for reasons other than sex appeal. That, or you are a dishonest shïtposter.
No.182762
Anonymous
Replies:>>182770
>>182761
No one is giving EVE shit. The only thing that was said is that she is likely to get overlooked for other designs. Don't twist words around.
No.182763
Anonymous
>>182760
It doesn't? It's just that male characters usually aren't voted for coom so it's not even a thing to discuss.
>>182761
That fag is a funposter. It's difficult to have reasonable discussions on /tnt/ cause of that fag specifically.
No.182764
Anonymous
>>182763
I thought this was about design not coom? So why isn't design this much of a factor in mr.?
No.182765
Anonymous
>>182763
>reasonable discussion
lol
lmao
No.182767
Anonymous
Replies:>>182769
>>182764
Because male characters aren't as evaluated on their looks? (by a mostly male voterbase). Same thing.
No.182768
Anonymous
Replies:>>182772
>>182763
No one was funposting EVE. I even said that EVE was a cute design, she would just get overlooked by other designs. Don't whine about reasonable discussion and then shut other people down.
No.182769
Anonymous
Replies:>>182777
>>182767
So this whole discussion has been kind of sexist since it hinges on the looks of women being more valuable whereas men are more evaluated on their character.
No.182770
Anonymous
Replies:>>182773
>>182762
That's as close as it gets to saying that a a character "isn't right" for the tournament.
No.182771
Anonymous
>>182754
This but unironically.
No.182772
Anonymous
Replies:>>182775
>>182768
People were referring to this >>182758 tard, not you.
No.182773
Anonymous
Replies:>>182774
>>182770
Factually speaking that is true. As we've mentioned multiple times, looks are a big part of character and design and are what's judged by our fellow anons. EVE isn't even a bad character, she'd probably do well in tag team.
No.182774
Anonymous
Replies:>>182776
>>182773
The metric here isn't really character design then, it's sex appeal.
No.182775
Anonymous
>>182772
Make it clear next time. This whole thread has just been people jumping on each other's ass for lightly disagreeing with them.
No.182776
Anonymous
>>182774
Yes? That's what's been discussed?
No.182777
Anonymous
Replies:>>182779
>>182769
I never said looks was more valuable than personality. In fact I concede looks alone is a more shallow vote, but not less valid as far as voting for a character quality goes.
There's predominantly male voters and 4chan is horny so yeah you'll get more looks voting in the female tournament than the male. Whatever.
No.182778
Anonymous
I fucking get it, I'll vote for conventionally attractive waifus only from now on.
No.182779
Anonymous
Replies:>>182782
>>182777
So would it be valid if we started voting for male looks as a character quality? You can't just whatever after debating for several hours, defend your thesis.
No.182780
Anonymous
Replies:>>182781
>>182764
Cuz we are talking about a voterbase that's majority male, and as such has sexists notions of what works for either tournament. Of course it were the other way around you would get the same arguments, only mirrored.
No.182781
Anonymous
Replies:>>182798
>>182780
Actually if we go by the tumblr sexy man archetype, females would have a much more varied pallet of men they go after and would value personality more. Despite men bragging about how not shallow they are and would fuck mind flayers, these threads prove otherwise.
No.182782
Anonymous
Replies:>>182784
>>182779
Yes? Where is it ever implied I wouldn't?
No.182783
Anonymous
I've never seen this sexist angle ever come up before. niggers just thinking of shit to keep arguing about now.
No.182784
Anonymous
>>182782
Well put your money where your mouth is come mr. Don't be a hypocrite.
No.182785
Anonymous
Replies:>>182787
>>182783
It was getting stupid when they kept bringing up """valid""" in terms of sexy voting. If you're going to vote with your dick, shut and don't let Twitter lingo like coomer trigger you.
No.182786
Anonymous
>>182759
>It gets gay when it starts becoming meta though and people vote for shit that's got nothing to do with a character outside a tournament context.
I don't know why you keep bringing this up when it's clear no one here thinks this way.
No.182787
Anonymous
Replies:>>182788
>>182785
I don't even know what you're saying anymore, anon. Who is triggered by "coomer"? Go to bed already.
No.182788
Anonymous
Replies:>>182789
>>182787
>Who is triggered by "coomer"?
This all started because someone brought coomshit or something. It started retarded and got even more retarded.
>Go to bed already.
Not everyone has your timezone anon.
No.182789
Anonymous
>>182788
>Not everyone has your timezone anon.
if you're not murrican you should not be voting.
No.182791
Anonymous
Replies:>>182793
Analysis fags have to be the worst thing to come out of /tnt/; they despise everyone taking meta so seriously yet they're the ones who never shut up about it.
At least sports statisticians have a skill that can be an applied to an actual job.
No.182793
Anonymous
Replies:>>182825
>>182791
analysis fagging existed before /tnt/ lol.
No.182794
Anonymous
Replies:>>182816
>>182783
It has come up before but nobody defined it as sexist.
And well, is giving importance to sex appeal exclusively to the female tournaments sexist? Yeah. Does it really matter? Not really.
No.182798
Anonymous
>>182781
Female's are also shallow coombrains, just in a somewhat different sense. Don't fall for memes.
No.182801
Anonymous
Replies:>>182814
>>182526
I mean, at least it's based on something from the show.
No.182809
Anonymous
Replies:>>182818
Funny thing is coom actually did play an rather unsaid role in the early Mr contests
There’s a reason the first two winners were buff guys. Bravo was the inaugural because he pretty much covered every criteria you could ever ask for in a candidate. Being fuckable was one of those noted aspects
No.182814
Anonymous
Replies:>>183045
>>182801
No it isn't
No.182816
Anonymous
>>182794
Yeah, there's a reason Fang was so hated.
No.182818
Anonymous
>>182809
>Tom is basically the Spinel of mr. /co/
No.182825
Anonymous
>>182793
And it sucked back then too
No.182836
Anonymous
Replies:>>182877
All I got out of this was that some anti-Fangfaggot had a several hours long melty.
No.182839
Anonymous
All I got out of this was a lousy t-shirt.
No.182851
Anonymous
All I got right now is this box of one dozen starving, crazed weasels.
No.182875
Anonymous
All I got is a rock.
No.182877
Anonymous
Replies:>>182885
>>182836
People are allowed to voice their displeasure over novelty picks that unfairly overshadow other characters
No.182885
Anonymous
Replies:>>182897
>>182877
People are also allowed to call you an annoying faggot.
No.182896
Anonymous
Replies:>>182905
I voted for fang because I like her show and her as a character too bad that’s frowned upon by some people.
No.182897
Anonymous
>>182885
Yes that would be considered ad hominem
No.182900
Anonymous
The fact that someone used the term “discriminated against” to refer to people voting for characters they personally do not like shows we are too far gone.
No.182905
Anonymous
Replies:>>182957
>>182896
You can like a character without liking their show. I doubt design was a factor for you liking Fang.
No.182916
Anonymous
Replies:>>182920
This place is /pw/ levels dumb. It's the same points over and over and nobody learns shit from any conversation or can even grasp anything beyond basic A to B points.
No.182920
Anonymous
>>182916
That's echo chambers for you.
No.182939
Anonymous
Replies:>>182960
This kinda makes me want a /lit/ tourney more. Imagine the autistic nuanced meta debates coming from /lit/fags arguing with each other.
No.182957
Anonymous
>>182905
Well I like primal, one of my favorite shows
No.182960
Anonymous
>>182939
Believe me anon, things would only be marginally more nuanced.
No.182965
Anonymous
Love me Jenny
Love me Mrs. Monarch
Love me Betty Boop
Love me Fang
Love me Wuya
Love me Frankie
Spinel... okay not even I can defend that one but at least it's a cautionary tale
Shrimpel as that. It's surprising how fun these tournaments are when you don't got a bitch in yo year telling you that everything after 2018 sucks dick
No.182969
Anonymous
No.182970
Anonymous
There's obviously nothing wrong with people voting for characters that aren't conventionally attractive by itself. However, because this is 4chan, people use this as yet another way to act obnoxiously contrarian and elitist, and that's what others have a problem with.
>we are so much better than you DUMB COOMERS because we don't vote with our dicks! get bent we will spitevote all your shitty coompicks out with our funny picks!
This kind of contrarian appeal was a clear element in Fang's run in 2020 and in 2022. This was maybe more prevalent for Fang herself in 2020, but in 2022 she was joined by Propane, who cranked this up to eleven and whose supporters also probably supported Fang for the meme. No wonder people associate her runs with this kind of obnoxious attitude.
No.182982
Anonymous
>>182970
Finally we can admit Fang was contrarian appeal first and foremost. People were suing characters like this and EVE to shit in other people's picks. This is why funny stuff gets a bad rap in this tournaments.
No.182990
Anonymous
Replies:>>182995
>>182970
If anything I've seen the opposite more often and it's usually waifufags who lash out against the perceived anti coomers and accuse not conventionally attractive picks of being only for memes or contrarianism or some other slight against sexy women.
In general, ms. let’s banter and Shitposting get under their skin way too easily.
No.182995
Anonymous
>>182990
>If anything I've seen the opposite more often
Case in point, the post right above you. Where the fuck have you seen EVE of all characters being used as a spite pick? Likewise, I heavily doubt the anons who are autistic about Slappy Squirrel are doing it to dunk on waifufags.
No.182996
Anonymous
Replies:>>183005
>king of /v/ accuses anyone of not being part of the OOC circlejerk as being no fun allowed
>ms. /co/ is genuinely no fun allowed and takes things way too seriously
I see why mr. and queen are regarded so highly
No.182997
Anonymous
>>182995
This guy is probably the same shit-stirrer from before. But Slappy vs Jucika in 2022 WAS another example of that anti-coom appeal at play.
No.183001
Anonymous
>>182997
Honest I always took it as spite directed towards Jucika specifically, it's not like she didn't get shit from people here.
No.183004
Anonymous
>>182995
>>182997
It's not one random shit stirrer; I was there in 2023 and people were getting antsy over EVE making E8, thinking it was going to be another Fang. The words used were along the lines of: "Look you have your unconventional pick now please just let us have a traditional waifu."

Ironically EVE's supporters took the ass shoves better than Chel's fans.
No.183005
Anonymous
>>182996
>Queen is fun and Ms. is anti-fun
Could've fooled me. Ms. was the tourney where people cheered on Fang eating her opponents and schizo drawings of Slappy dismembering Jucika. Queen was the tourney where people had panic attacks over a drawing of a dog in a muzzle and no, it wasn't because the host was doing it, people didn't know this at the time
No.183008
Anonymous
>>183004
>EVE's supporters took the ass shoves better than Chel's fans.
For the last time that shit was fake as fuck. Everyone falling for Chel falseflags was the low point of last year.
No.183009
Anonymous
>>183005
>Could've fooled me. Ms. was the tourney where people cheered on Fang eating her opponents and schizo drawings of Slappy dismembering Jucika.
This was spiteshit. Speaking of spite, one of the reasons people were antsy was because people keeping pushing the retarded coom/anti-coom binary. People tried making Ammy the new Fang but it doesn't work for the same reason king seething over Spider-Man didn't work; people genuinely liked the character and her source material.
No.183010
Anonymous
>>183004
You could tell that was some poor newfag for the most part 'cause EVE had already made E8 before and got real close again in 2022.
No.183014
Anonymous
Replies:>>183019
>>183008
>Chel has no actual fans outside of the dude who shoved her up his ass
Grim.
No.183015
Anonymous
Replies:>>183017
>>183008
Several parts of the falseflag's are being reiterated here in complete earnest. I'm half expecting someone to drop "effective quietness" at some point.
No.183017
Anonymous
>>183015
Because it’s the same obvious funposter fag here.
No.183019
Anonymous
>>183014
Even he ended up voting against to the retarded controversy going on.
No.183021
Anonymous
I'm surprised no one brought up how badly MD and TOH got shat on despite being harmless campaigners. The latter even had coom being used as a reason against her.
No.183034
Anonymous
>>182997
It wasn't even an anti-coomer spite thing, Slappy actually does have a decent coomer base
It's that Slappy is simply an asshole, so her campaigning as a cunt to her opponents is actually in-character for her, and Jucika is just the one who stuck as a memed rival because whoever was campaigning that year went all out with the paint OC and the upset overreaction from the opponents added to the hysterics
That people don't get that and still get upset at Slappy because of it is funny
No.183042
Anonymous
Replies:>>183112
>>183021
MD was overbearing as fuck. In 2023 they kept going after they lost, which probably contributed to their bad rep going into 2024
No.183044
Anonymous
>>178905
>you have never seen an episode of the show she comes from
A coomer saying this to someone is pure irony and projection. Imagine only caring about characters only because of your penis and then telling others that they’re fake fans who’ve never seen the show they claim to like.
No.183045
Anonymous
Replies:>>183049
>>182814
It's essentially Mac's fantasies about Frankie.
No.183049
Anonymous
>>183045
That's not the same as them actually getting together and a stupid reason to bring up in regards to voting for someone.
No.183060
Anonymous
Replies:>>183066
>>183021
MD was brought up constantly. Their problem is being honestly TOO prevalent with very little reach outside their generals, and very defensive about anything, so they come across as an annoying fan cult. In 2023 they kept sticking the rounds which also annoyed some people but that wasn't really an issue last year, possibly cause most of the fandom just went in on TADC.
TOH shitting has mostly been one notoriously obsessed tribefag for years and everyone calls him out.
No.183066
Anonymous
Replies:>>183087
>>183060
Looking back it was obvious he was using Enid as a proxy for Anne, who ironically lost to Chel and got AI slopped
No.183083
Anonymous
Replies:>>183102
>>182965
Spinel is basically why I don't believe anyone's claims about just enjoying the tourney, fun only, whoever wins wins ect. cause it's guaranteed they dislike Spinel and probably were seething about her in 2019 if they were there. Everyone implicitly has some standard for a "good" winner even if it's light.
No.183087
Anonymous
>>183066
The Industrycuck fake was also falseflagging Enid but considering the entire reason he started doing so was because of an extremely retarded tribalfag slapfight between her and Amity before either schizo did anything I can’t really say I’m surprised if anyone fell for it that year.
No.183091
Anonymous
>>183005
/v/ has a higher concentration of weebs, who tend to get really anal about their waifufagging. as long as things go exactly the way they want then it's the best thing ever, but any deviation is immediately a crisis worth derailing the entire thread to complain about. a lot of them are probably autistic.
No.183102
Anonymous
Replies:>>183109
>>183083
If Spinel wasn't literally rigged she wouldn't be the worst winner. She would still be FOTM but at least she had a genuine following.
No.183109
Anonymous
Replies:>>183134
>>183102
Is Wuya better then if we assume she was host rigged? Cause Spinel had a waaay bigger following.
No.183112
Anonymous
Replies:>>183119
Image:174009237137.jpg(790kB, 1242x906)1709081598367050.jpg
>>183042
this again?
No.183119
Anonymous
>>183112
Not even using that correctly. ICfag would be defending zoomer toons.
No.183122
Anonymous
>>183119
Not MD actually; he hates the fact there's the dad and did his usual cuck posting. His loyalty to zoomer toons is weird.
No.183130
Anonymous
Replies:>>183211
>>183122
He also tried to cuck post against N before hijacking him for his zoomer cartoon gigabasedchad harem NTR shit, which should make it pretty obvious he doesn’t care about any of the characters he funposts with or against and just goes with whatever will get the most attention.
No.183132
Anonymous
Replies:>>183170
>>182046
>>177823
>>178103
So basically, to get the truest estimate of a legit "all-stars" right now I think you could include inaugural winners by default, winners who won their first qualified year (not counting Spinel cause FOTM rigged) and winners that were consistently strong and could replicate a win another year. After that it's a matter of consistent statistical dominance.
So the closest thing to a legit "all-stars" line-up would probably be
>Jenny
>Fang
>Frankie
>Chel
>Tyr'ahnee
>Raven
>Kim Possible
>Starfire

>Bravo
>Kronk
>Skeletor
>Hank
>Jack
>Courage
>Grim
>Daffy (skipping JJJ cause he's fucked now due to Spiderman)
No.183134
Anonymous
Replies:>>183148
>>183109
Rigging aside, it's hard to tell. Spinel has the downside of being an obvious FOTM, but she does have a bigger following that's somewhat lasted even to this day. Wuya, on paper, has the advantage of being a 2000s legacy pick, but she wasn't a very popular one. In a vacuum, between these two, Spinel would probably be a better representative of /co/'s tastes.
No.183148
Anonymous
Replies:>>183153
>>183134
Wuya also had a nice rags to riches story with her going from repeated Round 1 loser to Champion
and since it's somewhat relevant to today's discussion, She has both great Sexiness and Personality to boot
No.183153
Anonymous
>>183148
>She has both great Sexiness and Personality to boot
I mean, so does Spinel really...
No.183170
Anonymous
Replies:>>183175
>>183132
>Only three of each of the strongest have won for both tournaments, and 10 of the other Elite 16 haven't
Grim
No.183175
Anonymous
>>183170
You don’t get to complain while King of /v/ is how it is.
No.183211
Anonymous
>>183119
>>183122
>>183130
point is, the idea that MD fans were overbearing in 2023 and stuck around after they lost is bullshit. i have combed the archives and found only a few anons complaining about it, and one of them was an ESL retard who even the other people in the thread were calling out for blatantly seething.
MD got discussed throughout the tournament because people picked up on it as the face of underdogs with high-effort campaigns, which was the hot button issue that year.
it's far more likely that people don't vote for MD characters because they don't like the show. i can understand that. there's a lot to dislike about the show. and no campaign is gonna convince people to vote for something they don't like.
No.183233
Anonymous
Replies:>>183856
>>183175
We have hope now that NSA is gone. King might be permanently fucked.
No.183338
Anonymous
Replies:>>183350
>>183211
I was there and MDfgs did in fact stick around themselves and wank a lot. You are full of shit if you're saying that wasn't happening lol.
No.183350
Anonymous
Replies:>>183539
>>183338
I was there and you are wrong and also you like man ass
No.183355
Anonymous
>>183175
The difference is /v/fags love how their tournaments go
Look at their Co-Op where they voted fucking King Boo to Elite 8
No.183398
Anonymous
>>183355
Eh, even with King Boo, co-op feels a lot less funposty and more that people care about the source material.
Now if Alex and Geralt made E8, that's a different story.
No.183401
Anonymous
>>183355
There's no inherent reason King Boo doesn't deserve to be in Elite 8. People like his game and his personality being memorable is probably part of why the jobber memes blew up in the first place.
No.183427
Anonymous
Replies:>>183466
>>183355
Infinite...
No.183466
Anonymous
>>183427
… is less of a jobber than King RAPEDoo
No.183477
Anonymous
>>181629
>people finally admitting Ayla would not have been a good winner
I almost felt bad considering the effort put into her at the end, but it as kind apparent she wouldn't age well and no one really believes she'd have the dimes or luck to repeat a similar run. The real finale was Hex vs. Mado.
No.183480
Anonymous
>>183477
Honestly after the Hex clusterfuck was taken care of, the interactions between Mado and Ayla were nice and threads were slightly more chill, even when the winner was obvious.
No.183483
Anonymous
Replies:>>183484
>>181629
>>183477
I still think she would have passed off as a 6 or maybe 7/10, but no way she would have held up as an agreeably great winner. Her campaign was fun, but she would have still felt obviously unusual as a winner. Chrono Trigger also has a few other picks that could go all the way instead and probably have better arguments over Ayla. Frog and Lucca come to my own mind.

If there's any condolence, there likely would have still been a fair argument for many ranking her over Recette. It would mainly just come down to how much you value older board legacy value over more broad classic appeal.
No.183484
Anonymous
>>183483
I would agree she's a solid C tier. Probably above Recette, probably below the rest. The biggest issue may be how she cucked mado again and reinforced the runner-up block though lol.
No.183485
Anonymous
>>183484
>The biggest issue may be how she cucked mado again and reinforced the runner-up block though lol.
Fair argument for her interpretation through a more meta lens, yeah. I feel Ayla or Palutena beating Mado would have definitely been seen as odd. If Hex had beat Mado, I do think either could have gotten by as a "sure, I can accept it" winner if they managed to take down Hex. Not sure they could have, of course. The closest we saw to that was the 3rd place match, and despite a close fight Palutena still lost to Hex.
No.183539
Anonymous
>>183211
>>183350
>underage MDfag is resorting to gay fantasies again
Your gaslighting will never work and drones will never make it passed round 1.
No.183542
Anonymous
Replies:>>183750
>>183539
N made it to round 4 in playboy
No.183562
Anonymous
>>183484
Recette has more board history. Ayla just happens to come from a game /v/ likes and it's debatable if she was even the best pick from it.
No.183563
Anonymous
Replies:>>183569
>>183562
We need more board history winners. Too many just get picked from games /v/ likes rather than what they contributed to the board.
No.183566
Anonymous
>>183562
Recette's board history is overstated. She was a meme for like a year. She got less mentions than any /v/ winner ever by far.
No.183569
Anonymous
Replies:>>183570
>>183563
The issue with /v/'s winners is NOT what games /v/ likes. If that were the problem we'd have a TF2 winner already and Batter never would have made it past round 1.
No.183570
Anonymous
>>183566
>She was a meme for like a year.
Evidently enough oldfags remembered her in 2021 to prove her legacy lasted.
>>183569
It's probably the same fag who keeps replying to everyone in faux agreement trying to make eveything into an inflammatory take.
No.183571
Anonymous
>>183570
Didn't she only one because of a drawfag and it had fuck all to do with "board legacy"?
No.183573
Anonymous
Replies:>>183578
>>183562
>Ayla just happens to come from a game /v/ likes
Liking the source material the characters come from should matter more than arbitrary board history.
No.183574
Anonymous
>>183566
I mean, /v/'s archive only goes as far back as 2015.
No.183575
Anonymous
>>183571
If people didn't remember her she wouldn't have qualified or gotten so close in votes to Jill Valentine in the first place.
No.183576
Anonymous
Replies:>>183582
>>183571
Recette representing oldfag legacy was a commonly brought up point during the tournament, yeah.
No.183577
Anonymous
>>183575
Right because obscure material being pushed by a few autists never happens in these things
No.183578
Anonymous
Replies:>>183579
>>183573
Character tournament. The thing is Ayla is just a relatively minor part of why people like CT.
No.183579
Anonymous
Replies:>>183580
>>183578
>Character tournament.
Agreed, which it's dumb to bring up board legacy over the characters themselves. Lucca and Frog should have made it before Ayla, let’s clear.
No.183580
Anonymous
Replies:>>183582
>>183579
I mean, board legacy is ultimately a part of how the board thinks about a character.
No.183581
Anonymous
>>183570
>It's probably the same fag who keeps replying to everyone in faux agreement trying to make eveything into an inflammatory take.
More like /co/ days seething that they don't have as good a winner as Recette.
No.183582
Anonymous
Replies:>>183584
>>183575
>>183576
>>183580
Why is it that board legacy is only a thing brought up with Recette while other winners have their actual character and source material talked about?
No.183583
Anonymous
Replies:>>183589
>>183570
She won cause of the big campaign and meta shift massively favoring campaigns that year. She was a low seed, hadn't qualified before, and absolutely would not have gotten even close to winning if she hadn't had the big positive thread push that stood out from all other standard picks. It's way more a campoon win than a legacy win.
No.183584
Anonymous
>>183582
It's not. It's brought up for Reimu, Batter, Grimm, and ironically Madotsuki too.
No.183585
Anonymous
Replies:>>183589
>>183584
>Batter
>Grimm
Those were also campaigner wins over any kind of legacy or appearing for the games
No.183586
Anonymous
>>183584
I can buy Reimu and Mado and even then, they didn't hang on to the legacy angle as hard as Recette's supporters. For the former, there's also the fact that Touhou fandom is still active and very intense.
No.183589
Anonymous
>>183583
>>183584
>>183585
I think separating Reimu and Madotsuki as board legacy winners and Recette, Batter, and Grimm as campaigning winners makes the most sense. The latter three did all play a huge part in changing and evolving tournament campaigning meta.
No.183590
Anonymous
The "board legacy" angle seems to come up mostly as cover reasoning for justifying campaign based wins of lesser apparent winners. Grimm, Batter, Recette, and to an extent Zorak and Grievous.
No.183592
Anonymous
>>183590
People also bring up board legacy when it comes to Garland.
No.183595
Anonymous
This gives me an idea of making a spectrum chart for winners. Something like an x/y axis evaluating popular/board-core and campaigner/silent majority.
No.183598
Anonymous
>>183590
Zorak's full legacy extends to him and his voice actor being major parts in the development of Cartoon Network.
No.183750
Anonymous
>>183542
Kindof a bummer he had to go up against Beerus, but that's the nature of tournaments. Maybe he can keep good momentum and get E8 next time.
No.183765
Anonymous
>>183539
>passed
eslBITCH...
No.183851
Anonymous
Image:174023340076.jpg(812kB, 866x1083)IMG_9733.jpeg
I think fang was a good winner
No.183856
Anonymous
Image:174023780803.png(1.22MB, 1830x902)Queen of v 2025 quarterfinals.jpg
>>183233
King is great fun. You may think it's shit because of a bad winner, but I would much rather have a shit winner than an "acceptable" winner where the tournament was a shitfest of seething, spiting and falseflagging. Like Queen 2025.
That or you weren't there to see for yourself how enjoyable it was and read about how it's a horror show here.