/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


File posting was rewritten, please post in the support thread if you experience any bugs.
Please consider donating! Thanks!

Thread stats: 260 posts, 36 files (36 image(s))

Replying to /tnt/131568
Options
No.131568
Ms. and Mr. /co/ Off-Season Discussion Thread #11Anonymous
Image:171760943182.jpg(106kB , 823x858 , 81755D2A-2664-4261-B44A-9DA605E085B2.jpeg)
Tools edition
No.131571
Anonymous
Replies:>>131572
Image:171760949266.png(87kB , 1080x1015 , FBFBA121-5AD4-4A92-9F0B-E1E2B64D8EFA.png)
comic win in the main tournament when?
No.131572
Anonymous
>>131571
Three more years.
No.131575
Anonymous
>>131568
Finally, a good OP image for the /co/ thread
No.131576
Anonymous
Fang was a bad winner.
No.131579
Anonymous
Fang was a great winner
No.131580
Anonymous
>>131568
MURDER SISSIES WTF IS THIS
No.131588
Anonymous
Fang was a shit winner
No.131592
Anonymous
Fang was a winner
No.131593
Anonymous
Mr. Incredible is a shit E8
No.131596
Anonymous
Replies:>>131598
Fang* wasn't a winner
No.131598
Anonymous
>>131596
/v/ btfo
No.131599
Anonymous
Replies:>>131611
>Murder Drones OP
>genuine discussion
>Fang OP
>low effort meme spam
so what have we learned here today?
No.131611
Anonymous
Replies:>>131616
>>131599
That Nfag will sabotage a thread if he can't be OP.
No.131616
Anonymous
>>131611
Anti-Fangbros... Our response?
No.131617
Anonymous
>One Guy is also Nfag
No.131620
Anonymous
Image:171763682839.jpg(161kB , 1280x720 , fucker.jpg)
As one of my favorite characters growing up, I still like Wuya as a winner, I just don't like the circumstances of her win and that's something she will have to carry with her forever.
No.131623
Anonymous
>>131620
Definitely better than Fang.
No.131624
Anonymous
>>131620
Wuyafags should be grateful that she wasn’t pushed to win to fulfill a meta criteria unlike Mr. Incredible.
No.131625
Anonymous
Nfag?
You mean Niggerfag
No.131627
Anonymous
>Nfag
>faNg
>Fang
No.131628
Anonymous
Replies:>>131634
>Fangfags are larping as the Nfag just to make Murder Drones fans look even worse
No.131629
Anonymous
Replies:>>131630
N and Mr. Incredible should fuck
No.131630
Anonymous
>>131629
more like N should fuck Incredible's wife
No.131632
Anonymous
More like I should fuck N
No.131634
Anonymous
>>131628
So that's what MD fags mean when they keep calling out "dinofag."
No.131636
Anonymous
Image:171764419288.png(56kB , 1298x200 , ZENren the ONE.png)
>cuckoldry shit
No.131653
Anonymous
Image:171765167537.jpg(239kB , 1156x1294 , 1694357748841256.jpg)
>>131620
As someone who rooted for Eris I've gone through all the stages of grief since NSA's downfall:

>denial she and Wuya might have been manipulated into the finals
>anger about the porno trick that NSA pulled off
>bargaining/coping ("her campaign was so strong she may not have even needed NSA's help at all")
>sadness that she'll also have to deal with the 'host favorite' reputation
>acceptance of the chaos and eagerly waiting for 2025
No.131663
Anonymous
>>131653
2023 really wasn't kind to second places
No.131689
Anonymous
I’d fuck fang desu
No.131690
Anonymous
Replies:>>131746
>>131653
>chaos
Eris gets to come back, this works for her. She's also one of the few characters whos vibes roll with it.

Wuya is the one tarnished, and Raven and Toph are the ones screwed over. (Not that this is Raven's first time).
No.131696
Anonymous
Replies:>>131697
No.131697
Anonymous
>>131696
HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS
No.131704
Anonymous
Replies:>>131705
fang is ugly desu
No.131705
Anonymous
Image:171771334572.jpg(458kB , 1125x859 , B2213EAC-DF45-42F7-B59E-F3BB04A39586.jpeg)
>>131704
t. Alphoomer
No.131706
Anonymous
>>131705
>t. seething soilennial
No.131707
Anonymous
>>131705
>still posting it
No.131713
Anonymous
https://boards.4chan.org/co/thread/143975470
No.131714
Anonymous
>>131713
>Immediate post seething over Mr incredible
No.131716
Anonymous
>>131713
Why do threads related to tournaments, whether deliberately or not instantly go to shit when they're linked here
No.131722
Anonymous
>>131716
Shitposters must funpost
No.131724
Anonymous
Replies:>>131792
Uh, this one is the stealth thread
https://boards.4chan.org/co/thread/143974159
No.131727
Anonymous
you know if it was any other character i'd tell the omni-man rper to piss off already, but i respect his commitment to the pomni-man bit. i never paid much attention to him in previous years so i'm curious as to how he'll play it.
No.131731
Anonymous
Replies:>>131738
>>131716
I wish people would stop linking threads here, there's no point in stealth threads if it's just the same faggots from /tnt/ sperging about the same shit they do here
No.131733
Anonymous
>>131716
I'm pretty sure most or all off-season threads are made by someone here.
No.131734
Anonymous
>>131727
I don't mind Omni-Man being one of /co/'s comic relief characters.
No.131738
Anonymous
>>131731
nooooo but i need my /v/ friends to brigade and start spammy sharty dbz memes and doomposting with me
No.131739
Anonymous
Replies:>>131741
>>131734
Honestly? Same here. He's fucked by being both a comic character and having serious recency bias, so if anything carving out a different niche might have been the best route for him. I'm not confident that a near completely serious Omni-Man campaign would actually do that well.
No.131741
Anonymous
>>131727
>>131734
>>131739
It's not like he had anything to lose considering he's THE poster boy of "FOTM jobbers" right down to being the namesake of the phenomenon.
No.131742
Anonymous
>>131727
I think they'll pull it off well.
No.131743
Anonymous
Image:171773119876.gif(17kB , 220x113 , zorak-space.gif)
*blink*
No.131746
Anonymous
>>131690
Part of me is thankful Eris didn't win so she didn't have to face all the scorn that went to Wuya; and even after NSA's bullshit, she has such a broad popularity (no pun intended) that she'll always be in the running.
No.131747
Anonymous
Replies:>>131750
>/tnt/ are inbred creatures. They are like the board equivalent of the hill people from The Hills Have Eyes.
Is this true?
No.131750
Anonymous
>>131747
‘Fraid so.
No.131754
Anonymous
Image:171779232022.jpg(1.79MB , 2774x3699 , 20240607_160238.jpg)
It's gonna be alright bros. KINO is now in the house
No.131755
Anonymous
Replies:>>131757
>>131754
I actually like that episode.
No.131757
Anonymous
>>131755
It's pretty fun, reminds me of Road to Rhode island
No.131761
Anonymous
>>131754
Get well soon!
No.131765
Anonymous
Why are so many retards getting worked up over Jucika
No.131766
Anonymous
>>131765
You are experiencing first-hand why Ms. /co/ is so cancerous.
No.131769
Anonymous
Replies:>>131775
>>131765
To be fair at least one of the Jucikafags has been acting really retarded. Maybe a troll.
No.131770
Anonymous
Replies:>>131772
One of the core Jucikafags is Augie, fyi.
No.131772
Anonymous
>>131770
Augie just attaches himself to anything eastern bloc /co/, it's just a facade.
No.131775
Anonymous
Replies:>>131776
>>131769
Sure thing antiJucikabro
No.131776
Anonymous
Replies:>>131779
>>131775
Okay "Jucika is just like Primal" tard
No.131779
Anonymous
Replies:>>131780
>>131776
Jucika and Fang have about the same amount of basic character traits. There is nothing wrong with pointing this out.
No.131780
Anonymous
Replies:>>131782
>>131779
It was more about the comic strip vs. the series. Even comparing Samurai Jack at one point.
No.131782
Anonymous
>>131780
I know what it was about, and I was only ever talking about the characterization. Maybe you misunderstood me.
No.131783
Anonymous
Replies:>>131787
I have a schizo theory about the Mr Incredible fag. What if it's all subtle 4d chess to make people so annoyed with ritual posting they vote Mr Incredible back into E8 this year, rendering his main complaint moot? While in actuality he's a Mr. Incredible supporter...
No.131787
Anonymous
>>131783
This would only prove his argument correct because Mr Incredible would be voted back in because of more metafagging instead of for convetional reasons.
No.131792
Anonymous
Replies:>>131821
>>131724
>What do you mean little to no actual /a/ representation?
I assume what he means is that it's quite literally not /a/ in any way whatsoever. The side tournaments for /co/ and /v/ still have posters that are from those boards; this /a/ side tournament, while I'm sure some people also browse /a/, can't be said to be participated by /a/ posters.
No.131793
Anonymous
Replies:>>131797
Why was Captain Amerigged getting worked up over Dastardly Duo?
No.131797
Anonymous
Image:171781548769.png(70kB , 2267x1155 , Celebrate.png)
>>131793
It's natural to be jealous of our greatness!
No.131821
Anonymous
Replies:>>131839
>>131792
Curious to stealthily run by the results on /a/ when it's done.
No.131826
Anonymous
So, pastebin?
No.131827
Anonymous
>>131826
The real pastebin was the friends we made along the way
No.131828
Anonymous
>>131826
NSA's COPEbin never existed.
No.131839
Anonymous
Replies:>>131842
>>131821
That would be fucking stupid, even more then doing it for Co-op or Tag-Team.
No.131842
Anonymous
Replies:>>131861
>>131839
Huh? Why is doing that stupid?
No.131861
Anonymous
>>131842
Already, doing it for those two is dumb because it being offboard, though /v/ is filled with off-topic shit anyway so it doesn't really matter there and plus4chan basically is just /co/ so I guess it's okay.
/a/ won't know this is happening nor would they care, coming in and saying "Here are the real HEROES of /a/! :D" when it has nothing to do with /a/ is stupid. Plus, good luck on getting your "stealth" thread to not get deleted.
No.131872
Anonymous
Image:171789302695.jpg(131kB , 1920x1080 , KILL RAPE AND DESTROY.jpg)
WHERE'S NIGHTSHIFT ANON?!
No.131875
Anonymous
>>131872
Either in the same Asylum room as NN, being molested by Cheesecake, being tortured by Serbian Nationalists, or hiding in the same sticky corner as every other coomer
No.131876
Anonymous
Replies:>>131877
>>131872
getting married to me
No.131877
Anonymous
>>131876
>t. Tumblr Sexyman
No.131879
Anonymous
Image:171792259958.png(562kB , 628x628 , 1649622930145.png)
Who do you all legitimately think will take this years Ms. /co/ title?
>IT'S MY MAIN
Lets say your main lost, who would you bet your money on to win? This is a post on good-faith and a lot of assumption.

My main candidates for taking this years crown, will most likely boil down to these three: Chel, Queen Tyr'ahnee and Jessica Rabbit.
No.131880
Anonymous
Replies:>>131883
>>131879
Ms. /co/ is the most volatile and hardest to predict tournament. by predicting someone will win it basically cancels the likelihood. There is no obvious stomp candidate like Fang now either. The safest prediction would probably be an inconspicuous mid-tier girl that no one or very few have predicted yet.
No.131881
Anonymous
>>131879
Watch it be Kim Possible
No.131882
Anonymous
No.131883
Anonymous
>>131880
>tfw my main is an inconspicuous mid-tier girl that no one or very few have predicted yet
No.131885
Anonymous
Image:171792847341.png(232kB , 1734x1698 , 1712075885285633.png)
>>131879
>Lets say your main lost
No.131886
Anonymous
>>131879
It's unironically going to be Peridot
The new hosts have not shown on any side tournament they have the ability or care to remove rigged votes, and might be pressured not to do so, so this is going to be a contest of who can fit in the most votes in 24 hours
No.131887
Anonymous
>>131886
>this is going to be a contest of who can fit in the most votes in 24 hours
so, like every other tournament?
No.131888
Anonymous
Replies:>>131889
>>131887
Yeah but this one is different. The new hosts are literally the worst.
No.131889
Anonymous
>>131888
NSA btw
No.131890
Anonymous
>>131879
I think Tyr'ahnee has a good shot at breaking the runner-up curse
No.131892
Anonymous
>>131879
It’ll probably be Ty’rahnee.
No.131895
Anonymous
>>131886
Peridot would be so cataclysmically stupid that it'd end up being kindof funny
No.131896
Anonymous
Replies:>>132111
>>131879
>Chel, Jessica Rabbit
They're too quiet to win. At this point you gotta have some kind of vocal push to win in the final push, otherwise they'll get trashed as silent or boring or whatever. Same with Frankie. They have the major potential but not enough fandom.
No.131901
Anonymous
>>131887
Not from one person or group, no. For the majors that's supposed to be very obvious and removable. During the NSA era that was removed (though arguably with bias on who she ignored) but recent tournaments the most obvious rig jobs were allowed to go by with no takedown of votes and that's concerning.
If NSA didn't remove qualifier votes last year Peridot would have easily been #1 qualified. That fucker is so autistic he would engage in this 24/7 and pay actual money to rig this thing and if action isn't being taken like hosts haven't been then she's your winner.
No.131902
Anonymous
Replies:>>131930
>>131901
What obvious rig jobs in recent tournaments? Bee's and shit in /an/? Clinton isn't working on the main tourneys.
No.131905
Anonymous
Image:171796129779.jpg(164kB , 1024x1024 , IMG_0741.jpeg)
Can’t wait to vote for STACYroid 18 in this year’s Ms /co/!
No.131906
Anonymous
Who are some consistent fringe candidates that you'd like to see last a round or two?

Not win, not even E8, but something akin to Tiff Crust's run from last year(character with loyal fans and a strong presence in qualifiers who hadn't managed to break through)
No.131930
Anonymous
Replies:>>131938
>>131902
Bees weren't even rigged, They were the top seed and even then they had a bit of trouble with some of their matchups.
No.131938
Anonymous
>>131930
Also the underage retard who started the rigging """drama""" just said "haha i was behind the results of every match i am le epic rigger xdddd", it didn't have anything to do with Bumblebee specifically
If there's anything that can be learned from it, it's not to give attention to faggots claiming they totally rigged all the matches, though that should go without saying
No.131945
Anonymous
>>131906
Emmet Brickowski would be nice to see in the bracket again
Also pretty much any Moomin character, I really hope Snufkin and/or Moomintroll can make it even if I know Tag-Team performances rarely have an impact elsewhere
No.131946
Anonymous
>>131879
>Chel, Queen Tyr'ahnee and Jessica Rabbit
Of those three, I see Jessica being most likely if she gets any support at all. There's general resistance to characters seen as "powerhouses" and Jessica is probably considered the least powerhouse of the three, regardless of her actual popularity. It's the perception that counts.

Sometimes a character builds up a rabid enough support base to do well the next time they compete (Tyr'ahnee, Fang, Eris), but I don't see anyone in particular this year that people are obviously rallying around. Odds are it will be some character from seeds 20-50. That's the sweet spot for both flying under the radar and actually having enough raw popularity to win anything. My best guess is a character that just missed the E8 last year, most likely Tinker Bell. She has some popularity, some meta stuff going for her (ousted by a NSA pick), and probably wouldn't be targeted as a threat early on.
No.131947
Anonymous
>>131946
>here's general resistance to characters seen as "powerhouses"
I feel like that mentality peaked with 2021 and has been gradually dying down since, I don't remember Toph and Raven getting that last year if nothing else besides the "powerhouse vs underdog" thing with Toph/Raven vs Wuya/Eris. Jessica tends to get at least some support already so with a good push I could see her making it far
I agree on Tinker Bell though, she already has a consistent fanbase on /co/ in general so I think she has what it takes to have a successful run. It's either her or Alice that I see being the big Disney reps this year
No.131948
Anonymous
>>131946
I think the "anti-powerhouse" era has died now that people look at results more closely, and the last time this argument was brought up people were tricked by it into supporting NSA's two candidates being the finalists
No.131949
Anonymous
No.131951
Anonymous
So...what's gonna become of Shirley? She had a pretty good campaign, but some fuck was rigging for all the animal reps, which got rid of a lot of trust. But now that that's been taken care of...
No.131956
Anonymous
Replies:>>131967
>>131951
It's pretty agreed upon these days none of the ""furriggers"" were actually rigged (at least not more than any other character) and it was mostly just NSA being a massive faggot and/or spiting them for some reason, but the thing is Shirley is the only character among them that is still thought to actually HAVE been rigged (at least that's the sentiment I'm seeing), so I still think her chances aren't great even if her campaigners come back. And for the record she did have a really fun campaign, it's just a shame about the circumstances
The Fall of NSA probably did put Shirley in a better position than she previously was, before she was basically doomed to never qualify again whereas now I think she at least has a chance. Though if she does make it in I really don't see her making it past round 1
No.131959
Anonymous
Replies:>>131961
>Totally Spies is the biggest show talked about right now with a new season
>Clover and Alex cucked themselves from having any boost from the new show by blowing their load early getting E8 last year and being barred from entry
Never get over how funny this is
No.131961
Anonymous
>>131959
Sam has a chance now at least.
No.131962
Anonymous
>>131961
finally worst girl will win
No.131965
Anonymous
>>131962
Fuck you.
No.131966
Anonymous
>>131962
Alex isn’t winning this year
No.131967
Anonymous
Image:171804755427.png(652kB , 748x662 , Shirley.png)
>>131951
>>131956
I mean, I do find the logic that NSA may have tried to screw the other girls on purpose in her first time hosting. I also hope Shirley's campaign can come back to redeem her regardless of whose fault was that. The only thing we won't be able to change is the fact the general thread consesus is that she had a foul play in her run. If that's so, then please keep the other girls out of that drama. It depresses me the idea that Shirley possibly had a good run but the host intentionally screwed her forever just like she's tainted Eris and Wuya now. I can do some posting myself but I'm not great either greentexting
No.131968
Anonymous
Replies:>>131969
>>131967
Forgot to add, I would be satisfied if Shirley just has some support in qualifiers or round 1 and loses in either of them.
No.131969
Anonymous
Replies:>>131971
>>131967
>>131968
She really is a round 1 or 2 exit.
Not to say she has no redeeming qualities, but it is way too fucked up to think a character not even couragefags seem to remember, makes it to the E8, let alone the FINALS. She legitimately doesn’t have the fame nor is an icon to really be considered even sweet 16 material.
No.131971
Anonymous
>>131969
Agreed. Like I wouldn't mind if she loses early. Sadly she was known but mostly when people wanted to pair her with Courage. Besides that,I like that now with the revelation about NSA I can look back at the OC she produced with a fresh mindset
No.131974
Anonymous
>>131961
Jerry*
No.131976
Anonymous
>>131951
She's gonna be SHIT and FINISHED like all the other rigged characters that year. Here's a reminder just in case you forgot. Remember these names so we can spitevote them into oblivion and to dunk on the riggers.
>Shirley*
>Nicole*
>Brisby*
>Judy*
>Tigress*
>Karen*
No.131980
Anonymous
Replies:>>132004
>>131976
NSAsister btw
No.131987
Anonymous
Replies:>>132004
>>131976
I had forgotten, I need to vote and support all of them. Thank you.
No.131989
Anonymous
Replies:>>131992
Image:171808397411.png(425kB , 588x422 , EAT SHIT AUTOBOTS.png)
I TOLD YOU. I FUCKING TOLD YOU!
No.131990
Anonymous
Replies:>>131992
In the end the decepticons were right and we all laughed at them
No.131991
Anonymous
Replies:>>132004
No.131992
Anonymous
Replies:>>132007
>>131989
>>131990
Megatron lost
No.131994
Anonymous
Replies:>>132004
>>131976
These characters are greaf, I'll make sure to vote for all of them!
No.131998
Anonymous
Replies:>>132009
>>131967
>first time hosting
I think I saw you post this misconception in the stealth thread too, the first time NSA hosted was Mr. /co/ 2021.
No.132003
Anonymous
>>131951
You can see here how there's still Shirley apologists, so that group has a vested interest in still promoting her in this tournament.
The 2022 run made it so everyone in tournaments knows who she is, and unless it's universally despised (like CA) then they have a hard time not competing. And Shirley is mostly but not entirely.
So my guess is she's too known and will make the bracket, but lose immediately unless she's seeded against a real shitter due to being clear how fucked that run was. And she'll either be round 1 fodder for life or more likely eventually slip out of the bracket as the years go by and never qualify again. I personally think she makes it this year, loses round 1 bad and never is seen again in the bracket.
No.132004
Anonymous
>>131980
>>131987
>>131991
>>131994
The furriggers are getting mad lol. Continue your seething. We all know you're gonna get BTFO again just like last year.
No.132006
Anonymous
Replies:>>132019
Image:171811111063.gif(148kB , 810x900 , 171808839920.gif)
No.132007
Anonymous
>>131992
at least he's no criminal
No.132009
Anonymous
>>131998
I think he meant with her fully taking in charge. Back then we had stats
No.132011
Anonymous
>>132009
And also the only one who knew about her actions was Ghost anon. Aka Dominos.
No.132013
Anonymous
Replies:>>132037
>>132009
In Mr. /co/ 2021? No we didn't, remember stats exclusively solo hosted up until he disappeared without a trace during the Ms. /co/ 2021 afterparty
No.132016
Anonymous
>Murder Drones got their own Plus4chan board
Were they /tnt/‘s series all along?
No.132017
Anonymous
>>132016
Maybe it means they can fuck off from here though.
No.132018
Anonymous
>>132016
What's the backstory behind that, were they having issues with the jannies on /co/ or something
No.132019
Anonymous
No.132021
Anonymous
Replies:>>132024
I don't know what MDfags are thinking by trying to follow Battler's footsteps in being a punching bag that will suddenly get a boost out of it. Look at what happened with King Boo and Icon
No.132024
Anonymous
>>132021
Only ginger characters can accurately follow in battler's footsteps.
No.132033
Spideranon !!hAaBXjbZBz7
>>131886
>The new hosts have not shown on any side tournament they have the ability or care to remove rigged votes
Not shown, because it was not done in public or talked about in public. That and other talk was done privately.
>>131901
>recent tournaments the most obvious rig jobs were allowed to go by with no takedown of votes and that's concerning.
To not go in any particular detail, no, it happened. Although I cannot speak about /an/'s since I have no particular contact with Clinton.
No.132035
Anonymous
Image:171813792518.png(86kB , 537x433 , 1711923914819417.png)
>>132016
campooner series
campooner board
do the math
No.132037
Anonymous
Replies:>>132042
>>132009
>>132013
Newfags are slowly revising tourney history...
No.132038
Anonymous
People really want to be contrarian to all things NSA, but just saying, Ms. 2022 did have some weird outlier performances from characters who normally don't perform nearly as well.

Aside from Shirley, the outlier performances I remember were Creepy Susie, Judy, and Tigress, all of whom are normally Round 1-2 jobbers.
No.132042
Anonymous
>>132037
Old fart...
No.132044
Anonymous
Replies:>>132055
Image:171814314578.png(538kB , 1280x979 , Msco22_oc_83.png)
>>132038
Creepy Susie in particular was long overdue for a deeper run, the fact she had failed to go past round 1 until then was in of itself a gag. Most of her 2022 opponents weren't much to write home about, so yeah, I think it makes sense she went as far as she did.

What definitely DOESN'T make sense is her failure to qualify the subsequent year, after five tournaments of perfect attendance and her best result yet, to boot.
No.132045
Anonymous
Replies:>>132055
>>132038
This. We all know characters' performance can't ever change during tournaments. Must be the work of riggers. Jobbers should stay jobbers forever. Nevermind the fact that people just like those characters and definitely nevermind the fact that Judy got to 3 rounds literally the year before that even without a very active campaigner. The fact they did well was mind-boggling. I hate riggers so much.
No.132047
Anonymous
Reminder that if you use asterisks on anyone then you’re are going against the wishes of Stats himself
No.132052
Anonymous
Replies:>>132054
>>132047
What if I use Asterix on anyone?
No.132054
Anonymous
Image:171815090699.png(33kB , 417x400 , Spoiler image)
>>132052
No.132055
Anonymous
>>132044
>>132045
Logically, since Susie's "performance" in 2023 is much closer to her other showings, then her performance in 2022 is the clear outlier and is what should be questioned. Same for other characters. You can hate on NSA all you want but you can't say there's no logic in what I'm pointing out.
No.132056
Anonymous
>>132055
I was agreeing with you. NSA was right and this was all the work of riggers.
No.132057
Anonymous
>>132047
Everyone gets an asterisk, it's all rigged anyway
No.132059
Anonymous
Replies:>>132068
Image:171815796899.jpg(99kB , 1083x611 , 1705789667438972.jpg)
>>132016
Well uh, at least I'm personally content with what we've had for /co/ so far
No.132067
Anonymous
Replies:>>132069
Image:171816348422.jpg(5kB , 250x121 , jrking finner.jpg)
>Did you hear that, JR? It looks like Ms. /co/ 2023's qualifiers was legit despite NSA pulling the strings from the shadows in favor of her favorites!
>I heard it right, King. My god, I've never heard biggest bullshit from anon since Vince with the whole Montreal Screwjob
>*wheezes*
No.132068
Anonymous
Replies:>>132070
>>132059
i don't want to imagine what a /dbs/ board would be like
No.132069
Anonymous
>>132067
Based.
No.132070
Anonymous
>>132068
It’d be dead as fuck due to being on plus4, no one’s gonna want to use it unless it’s on the main site.
No.132079
Anonymous
Replies:>>132198
>>132055
Suddenly dropping out of the top 128 after being a consistent middle seed for years is the outlier performance. It would be one thing if the character had been gradually losing presence in the tournaments, but it makes even less sense that it happened right after her best year.
Also, the alternative to this is implying Susie actually was being rigged in 2022 but NSA obfuscated this fact for whatever reason.
No.132084
Anonymous
Replies:>>132090
Don't forget Goo also got suspiciously high seed.
No.132087
Anonymous
Replies:>>132089
>Email verification turned on once
>Suddnely very obscure character with little vocal support who qualified every tournament suddenly doesn’t
Hmmmm
No.132089
Anonymous
>>132087
Email verification was only active during the round matches, qualifiers didn't have it.
No.132090
Anonymous
Replies:>>132094
>>132084
NSA's favorite
No.132093
Anonymous
Replies:>>132100
>primal season 3 may be revealed tomorrow

We may get a look at Ms /co/ 2025 lads
No.132094
Anonymous
>>132090
How come she didn't win then?
No.132095
Anonymous
>>132094
Because NSA planned her other favorite to win obviously. Though realistically it's because it would be significantly easier for NSA to tamper with the qualifiers, which we have proof of NSA having done in the past through various means, than it would be to tamper with the rounds themselves without attracting suspicion from the other hosts. Thus NSA was able to rig Goo in but not able to rig her to win an actual round, especially when she got BTFO that hard against Alex
Also I remember one schizo theory I saw was that NSA swapped Creepy Susie's seed (or maybe it was Nia's seed I forgot) with Goo's, so one of them got cucked out of the bracket just so NSA could force in Goo. I'm not sure if there's even anything to base that claim off but it would be funny if true
No.132098
Anonymous
>>132094
Because Goo winning the tournament would've raised a bigger bullshit flag than Spinel. It was noteworthy enough she qualified, though having her in the top 30 seeds was pushing it.
No.132100
Anonymous
>>132093
Her name? Fangigger
No.132102
Anonymous
Image:171822152030.jpg(110kB , 900x900 , 5442CE31-E26F-40AF-9738-1FB9719BD354.jpeg)
here's your indie winner bros
No.132105
Anonymous
>>132102
That's not Hank J. Wimbleton!
No.132111
Anonymous
Replies:>>135244
Image:171822598331.jpg(51kB , 564x829 , a558fb7cccb412447f8d49a9a3ddf4a6.jpg)
>>131896
>>131946
I am planning on doing a campaign for Jessica Rabbit this year. It really is high time the uncrowned Ms. /co/ takes her proper title.
No.132120
Anonymous
>>132102
Shouldn’t win, but I’d be fine with an elite run.
No.132198
Anonymous
Replies:>>132199
Image:171826897823.png(74kB , 852x582 , csp.png)
>>132079
>Suddenly dropping out of the top 128 after being a consistent middle seed for years is the outlier performance.
I mean, if you look at pic related it's pretty clear what's the outlier performance here.
The thing is, even if Shirley was the only rigged character, that still means any number of other characters could have inadvertently benefitted from this simply because of the rigger happening to vote for them enough times.
> NSA obfuscated this fact for whatever reason.
Could be that she didn't notice/didn't care.
No.132199
Anonymous
>>132198
>The thing is, even if Shirley was the only rigged character, that still means any number of other characters could have inadvertently benefitted from this simply because of the rigger happening to vote for them enough times.
At that point, all the matches in the tournament can be argued to have been rigged. This is still ignoring the incrongruity of a perfect attendance qualifier dropping out without warning, which is more surprising than beating Francine Smith first round.
>Could be that she didn't notice/didn't care.
It's not so much the character couldn't possibly have been rigged, but as to what reason would NSA have to ignore it in particular. NSA didn't show bias towards the character and, as has been pointed out, among the furriggers she even made request OC for Shirley before the infamous 2022 rigging reveal.
No.132213
Anonymous
I'm always neutral on this speculation especially knowing what NSA herself has done but the only character I agree her results were still fishy is Shirley. The others just didn't deserve to be grouped with her if NSA lied about Nicole being actually rigged
No.132274
Anonymous
Fang is hot desu, I wish we saw more of her cloaca.
No.132276
Anonymous
Fang is ugly desu, I wish we saw less of her in the tournaments.
No.132277
Anonymous
>>132276
I love snoot game and fang should be queen
No.132394
Anonymous
Replies:>>132443
Image:171840693589.jpg(585kB , 2152x1712 , 46431B93-87AC-4AD8-BA1E-4EF6D5FE288C.jpeg)
>>132276
Fang is hot an there is absolutely nothing you can do about it
No.132443
Anonymous
>>132394
That's a dinosaur with absolutely no sex appeal.
No.132678
Anonymous
Replies:>>133098
https://poal.me/r7k2oz
No.132708
Anonymous
Image:171842143997.jpg(521kB , 629x1100 , B76AD95F-DE9C-4883-B6C3-B4009B592134.jpeg)
>>132276
t.
No.133098
Anonymous
Replies:>>133114
>>132678
>3-1
Fangsissies... We got too cocky...
No.133114
Anonymous
>>133098
Did you actually, unironically, make that and expect any other result? Of course no one else here finds the dinosaur sexy, I know that.

t. Fangfucker
No.133191
Anonymous
Image:171850343771.png(68kB , 230x217 , Gluzoka Devochka.png)
I'm pairing Noodle up with her
No.134900
Anonymous
Might actually try a serious campaign for Mr. Boss coming off Season 2. Would be nice to see him get some sort of redemption instead of just being known for being cucked out of a slot in 2022.
No.135244
Anonymous
Image:171872058901.png(262kB , 512x512 , 523731213.png)
>>132111
I legitimately pray that she's the Ms. /co/ this year. It would legitimately make the tournament have a massive comeback because we will finally have a winner that's hot, has character and personality, has some serious legacy behind it and most important of all: Being Board Relevant.
Jessica Rabbit Why Don't You Do Right HDyoutube thumb
No.135252
Anonymous
>>135244
I mean, it'd be cool if she won, but she's got no presence, and had very little attention before. If there would be some consistent campaigners she could win. I was thinking of finally giving Chel some support too.
No.135272
Anonymous
>>135252
Someone’s planning on giving her a major campaign this year apparently
No.135281
Anonymous
I want to campaign for the nostalgia critic.
No.135338
Anonymous
>>135281
Since we're doing /a/ right now you could try to push for us to do /tv/ and then you'd have your chance.
No.135343
Anonymous
Replies:>>135454
>>135252
She's not my favorite to outright win, but if she's not running interference with my few mains I'm likely just going to keep voting her up the first four rounds. She's a jarring omission from Elite Eight at this point.
No.135454
Anonymous
Replies:>>135575
Image:171875278190.jpg(37kB , 720x623 , 1713409070651889.jpg)
>>135343
>She's a jarring omission from Elite Eight at this point.
Her two chances at making E8 was snuffed out by Peridot in 2019 and Hilda in 2021. She went against the two pen-ultimate poster childs of those years shitstorms.

Even more jarring fact to know is that out of the 15 total opponents she has faced, 9 have strong E8 placements under their name. Shirley and Johanna placing 2nd place with Kim Possible, Hilda and Frankie placing 3rd. I really think that Jessica is cursed as fuck.
No.135575
Anonymous
>>135454
She's the designated power jobber alongside Dominator. There always has to be a few to get the topmost contendors over.
No.135738
Anonymous
>>135244
I mean, I like her a lot too and I always vote for her but don't build any one contestant as a messiah, anon. Unless you get really, really lucky it can only lead to dissappointment
No.135741
Anonymous
Replies:>>135745
Image:171881557985.png(161kB , 556x766 , 48D5B660-20BE-45E2-9FF1-AEAEC1C6022E.png)
this must finally be Round 2, where's my opponent?
No.135745
Anonymous
Replies:>>135762
Image:171881696220.jpg(78kB , 641x534 , excellente.jpg)
>>135741
No.135762
Anonymous
Replies:>>135810
Image:171882156764.jpg(28kB , 225x225 , 6FF8CAC4-9703-4732-A271-ED2CDB2BDD8A.jpeg)
>>135745
hey get away from me
No.135810
Anonymous
Replies:>>135830
Image:171882598766.jpg(14kB , 175x289 , images (48).jpeg)
>>135762
You seem just like The Russian's type of man.
No.135830
Anonymous
Image:171882965825.jpg(103kB , 1042x1198 , D04BEF0C-0A57-4DE9-98DA-F63E891E0E78.jpeg)
>>135810
so this is my opponent? alright bring it on
No.136081
Anonymous
i don't know who the fuck this guy is but this is instantly one of the tournament's worst jokes. as horrendously unfunny as others can get, at least they're not spilling over into unrelated threads.
No.136083
Anonymous
>>136081
I dunno it's pretty funny
No.136085
Anonymous
>>136081
Yugi bro btw.
No.136106
Anonymous
Replies:>>136108
That latest stealth thread was honestly good and interesting to see what the natural board feel is instead of all the sharty, /v/, or tourneyfag tourist opinions and spam as they are too preoccupied with /a/
No.136108
Anonymous
>>136106
I'll post an archive of it as a response to anyone calling Betty a literal who or irrelevant winner for now on.
No.136114
Anonymous
>>136108
Post it now?
No.136117
Anonymous
>>136108
Betty is a literal who
No.136118
Anonymous
>>136115
lol, I didn't mean to click the NSFW tag at all
No.136119
Anonymous
Image:171885598665.png(79kB , 540x396 , 1715102586228.png)
(try this again) With all the talk about Jessica Rabbit, I'd also keep Pacifica Northwest in mind with regards to characters well overdue for recognition. Always highly rated, always has a vocal support base, but every single year so far, she's been stonewalled in the third round. I shall stand for this no more.
No.136121
Anonymous
>>136117
RETARD
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/144092003/#144143777
No.136129
Anonymous
Replies:>>136139
>>136121
>those couple anons confused why Niacey got 6th place over Regular Duo and Warner's Finest
Shame no one jumped in to tell them they also tied with Wallace & Gromit.
No.136139
Anonymous
Image:171886498120.png(548kB , 1196x1099 , Snuggles.png)
>>136129
Truly the darkest of dark horses.
No.136149
Anonymous
Replies:>>136165
>>136117
>Literal who fag is confirmed to be a tourist to /co/ who raids when tournaments happen
Lol
No.136150
Anonymous
Replies:>>136165
>>136117
Maybe on planet retard.
No.136165
Anonymous
>>136149
>>136121
>>136150
I'm not even that guy I just wanted to see the thread
No.136179
Anonymous
>>135244
I know this might come across as insultful and clueless, but what type of legacy does Jessica Rabbit have? I know she stars in a movie where there's a lot of big names in it but I am legitimately not sure what else.
No.136182
Anonymous
Replies:>>136189
>>136179
Nostalgia Critic put her as #1 in his top 11 hottest animated women.
No.136189
Anonymous
>>136182
Anon he put sailor moon in there too.
No.136190
Anonymous
>>136179
it's a good movie
No.136198
Anonymous
>>136179
It has a lot of things that it permanently revolutionized for the animation industry. But the most important things boil down to these three:

1. Steven Spielberg directed it
2. It was a collaboration between Walt Disney, Warner Bros and Universal Pictures
3. Father of modern western animation, Richard Williams, was the main animator for the movie.

Starting off, it is pretty obvious why it is such a big deal that Steven Spielberg directed it. He also was responsible for the biggest cinematic studios to collab with each for them to star their characters in the movie. But most importantly, Richard Williams was the guy who animated the movie. The things this movie achieved wouldn't have been feasibly possible without this artist in the production. He's singlehandedly responsible for teaching and revolutionizing modern western animation (not western artstyle but western animation. Big difference). His animation skills were absolutely unparalleled and made 2D animation blend in with the realistic background flawlessly.
No.136225
Anonymous
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm comics and cartoons
No.136507
Anonymous
>NSA was probably lying about furriggers
>that means Shirley was actually second place the whole time
>the argument for Fangs asterisk is gone
Ummmmm, asterisk xisters, what the fuck
No.136509
Anonymous
>>136507
>2024
>Shirlnigs are still trying to make up why the most blatant rigged run in Ms /co/ history ackually was legitimate
No.136510
Anonymous
>>136507
I still think Shirley was stranger than the other furry picks that got far, but at the same time it almost seems that people forget she was getting a lot of attention around her campaign. Saying she was simply rigged doesn't tell the full story.
No.136513
Anonymous
>>136507
I refuse to believe Shirley getting to finals was legit. To an extent Nicole still feels bullshit to me too.
No.136517
Anonymous
Replies:>>136591
>>136510
it's possible that some minor rigging got the ball rolling, then she picked up momentum from a solid campaign and people generally liking courage. but there's no way it was entirely legit.
No.136520
Anonymous
>>136179
To give an answer that's not just about her movie, she's a thoughtful parody on Golden Age Hollywood actresses who turns out to be sincere and capable beneath her pretty exterior. She's just a likable character and arguably the biggest breakout among the movie's original cast. When you throw in her renowned sex appeal and the impact of her movie, it all adds up to a strong pick. She's absolutely deserving to make at least Elite Eight.
No.136522
Anonymous
Replies:>>136547
>>136179
WFRR basically was the start of the late 80s/early 90s renaissance, both in film (where it's basically the first film in that line) and tv. It had such a solid critic reception and box office success that it single-handedly revived interest in quality, mature animation. And that's before Jessica inspired a whole generation of waifus
Roger Rabbit himself might represent better but he's a niche, non-serious character in Mr /co/ terms with inconsistent on and off qualifying and never getting past round 1. Which means Jessica has to take the reigns, and with that background she wouldn't be a bad winner in the slighest
No.136547
Anonymous
>>136522
a lot of good legacy/representative picks in mr. /co/ are stymied because the average character quality is so damn high that they can barely get their foot in the door. seriously, mr. /co/ is in a whole 'nother echelon compared to every other tournament.
No.136555
Anonymous
Nightshift really shoulda just removed the 4 votes and let Chel move on
One time rigging was the correct move
No.136559
Anonymous
Replies:>>136560
>>136555
The one time I've actually been peeved by /v/fag crossover autism and where I think it had an actual influence on /co/ tourneys was the Armstrong fag that was basically responsible for slightly tipping the votes in Shirley's favor.
No.136560
Anonymous
Replies:>>136564
>>136559
All Chel did was get shoved up some attentionfag's butt, anon.
No.136561
Anonymous
>>136555
Seriously, this is what blows my mind the most about the situation. If she wasn't actually lying about or misreading Shirley being rigged, this would have been the obvious course of action.
No.136562
Anonymous
>>136561
But then NSA wouldn't get "glory" to stroke her ego for giving the big epic asterisk to the horrible, evil furries if she just quietly removed a couple of votes
No.136563
Anonymous
Replies:>>136588
>>136562
The reveal that both Elite Eight images were done by her was insane. I disliked the use of the asterisks there already, but I assumed it was some anon or couple of anons just sticking by the "official" word. Learning it was NSA made it even worse, and it's a shame we don't have pics without the asterisks now.
No.136564
Anonymous
Replies:>>136584
>>136560
That doesn't make Shirley the better choice.
No.136565
Anonymous
>furfags are STILL getting mad
Shouldn't have rigged, now take this
>*
No.136572
Anonymous
>>136565
>says stupid shit
>accuses others of just being mad
A tale as old as time...
No.136575
Anonymous
>>136565
Are the furfags in the room right now anon?
No.136584
Anonymous
Replies:>>136586
>>136564
Chel didn't do a very good job of showing she was a good choice to begin with
No.136586
Anonymous
>>136584
You're thinking too much in a campooner mindset.
No.136587
Anonymous
Replies:>>136589
Chel is boring and Armstrong was right.
No.136588
Anonymous
>>136563
>and it's a shame we don't have pics without the asterisks now.
Here.
https://files.catbox.moe/xtf6h8.png
https://files.catbox.moe/rh1sdz.png
No.136589
Anonymous
Replies:>>136620
>>136587
It's not about being right, it's about doing it in semi's against Shirley of all times.
No.136591
Anonymous
>>136510
>>136517
Shirley might not have been rigged at first, but NSA basically going and saying "DON'T vote for these characters you guys!" guaranteed she would be rigged for the rest of the tourney.
No.136595
Anonymous
>>136555
>>136561
>>136562
Too revisionist in history.
Main reason was NSA basically could not remove any votes because there wasn't anything saying people could, as after the Captain America accident people didn't trust hosts enough to not just remove votes so their favorites moved forward. Similar with the Emmy/Mika controversy where it came out the characters were openly being rigged by outsiders, however neither were removed and allowed to advance due to not wanting to start a trend where people rig characters so they could be disqualified and it was decided for people to naturally vote them out next round.
NSA probably thought people would do the same with shitters like Shirley and Nicole once she brought up rigging, which the opposite then happened potentially due to a stronger rigging setup and potentially due to /v/types being encouraged to go against host for lulz
The sketchy part was not asking this right when the characters were said to be rigged but waiting until the final round so that Fang was basically guaranteed the win, even if it was very high probability she would have won against Chel also
No.136596
Anonymous
>>135281
What the actual fuck is this board's obsession with Nostalgia Critic and AVGN I don't get it
No.136603
Anonymous
>>136596
the lols
No.136604
Anonymous
>>136595
don't those usually happen in the final round?
No.136618
Anonymous
>>136596
Dunno, but JdG is better than AVGN.
No.136620
Anonymous
Replies:>>136623
>>136589
When only four characters are left, people are going to have more scrutiny against obvious weak links
>>136588
Wow, you'd you get such clean edits?
No.136622
Anonymous
>>136595
>Main reason was NSA basically could not remove any votes because there wasn't anything saying people could
if NSA gave even the slightest fuck about the rules she wouldn't have taken a big fat shit on the final round
No.136623
Anonymous
>>136620
>people are going to have more scrutiny against obvious weak links
Right… so Shirley should’ve lost.
No.136625
Anonymous
Replies:>>136665
Even if most furry picks in Ms. 2022 weren't rigged, it's still annoying how resident furfags jump on every excuse to whine about being the most oppressed minority and how everyone is out to get them when most people just don't give a shit.
No.136626
Anonymous
>>136595
>NSA probably thought people would do the same with shitters like Shirley and Nicole once she brought up rigging
The problem here is that you assume NSA was merely a case of incompetency and didn't have any ulterior motives by that point. Hosts have always had the ability to trash individual votes, there really was no point at all to bringing up rigging other than just wanting to kick the hornets nest, which is something people had accused NSA of since the very beginning.
No.136665
Anonymous
>>136625
I do find it tragic that Captain Amelia was also grouped with the furries on being a rigged pick, when there’s little to no evidence of that ever actually happening.
No.136773
Anonymous
>>136588
Thanks!