/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Please consider donating! Thanks!

Thread stats: 610 posts, 92 files (91 image(s), 1 video(s))

Replying to /tnt/10800
Options
No.10800
Ms. /co/Anonymous
Image:166216676263.jpg(161kB, 1195x1564)enaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg
it began
No.10801
Anonymous
Image:166216731136.png(209kB, 399x490)disgust.png
>>10800
yes indeed it did
so uh, what now? Wait for the other half of the globe to wake up?
No.10802
Anonymous
>>10800
That first thread is always one of the hypest moments of the tourney. Now it's just wait 22 hours.
No.10803
Anonymous
Replies:>>10805
Image:166216871592.png(259kB, 467x593)addy cute.png
Welp, now we're waiting, who nominated Jucika before me you schmuck

t. nominated picrel
No.10805
IC
Replies:>>10807
Image:166217563353.png(161kB, 864x1296)Jucika early polling.png
>>10803
I did.
No.10806
Anonymous
Image:166217570975.jpg(174kB, 720x511)1661283984211785.jpg
vote for piper kaufman from intragalactic!
No.10807
Anonymous
>>10805
hnng JUICYka
No.10810
Anonymous
Replies:>>10811
Aaaand the fake threads start, lovely
No.10811
Anonymous
>>10810
By fucking lunafag of all people, how are anons this retarded
No.10812
Anonymous
>real thread archived
>fake and gay one still up
Its fucking over.
No.10813
Anonymous
Ive always wanted to play coin toss roulette with the hotpocket munchers, lez see if the graveyard shift possesses reading comprehension
No.10814
Anonymous
Replies:>>10816
OK, I'm on a cruise and 4chan doesn't work on the cruise wifi and I won't have access to mobile data tomorrow, which is when the qualifier vote is. Can someone please post the link to the voting Google doc when it happens?
No.10815
Anonymous
I'm so pissed off, ms co is my favourite time of year
No.10816
Anonymous
Replies:>>10817
>>10814
I gotcha bud. 10 something hours till qualifiers
No.10817
Anonymous
>>10816
Thank you so much, man
No.10818
Anonymous
Replies:>>10819
Still annoyed I can't cheerlead my picks though, but we'll see
No.10819
Anonymous
>>10818
sorry to hear that man
No.10820
Anonymous
Can a VPN bypass the block?
No.10821
Anonymous
Image:166221883360.png(278kB, 700x350)5a56818ba75e201f008b4c14.png
Orel Peterson Here... I'm going to be busy doing something late in the night. So I won't be here for the Qualifiers. So to make up for this I am giving you this cover of a parody that some anon made in the first thread.
>A Girl Worth Voting For
https://voca.ro/1lFfxyef5dbk
I could not find a backing track/instrumental/karaoke for the original song but I do hope more anons will end up joining this eventually. Sorry for the shitty singing but it's the best I could do.
Now I have to get ready for tonight. God Speed You Magnificent Mother Fuckers.
No.10822
Anonymous
And my.mobile data is officially out. Be sure to send me that qualifier voting doc
No.10823
Anonymous
Replies:>>10824
We hit the 1k nominations, lads!
Is this a good or a bad thing?
No.10824
Anonymous
Replies:>>10825
>>10823
Par for the course nowadays. Shame I can't view threads on mobile while working, all the campaigning starts when I'm off the clock
No.10825
Anonymous
>>10824
All my characters already got in so now I’m just waiting for the nomination proportion of the preliminaries to end, the qualifying section is where the fun begins
No.10826
Anonymous
Replies:>>10827
Is Desuarchive down?
No.10827
Anonymous
>>10826
It seems to be the case; does not load for me either.
No.10828
Anonymous
According to Downornot, it's been down for 2 days
No.10829
Anonymous
Replies:>>10830
How long before the qualification?
No.10830
Anonymous
Replies:>>10831
>>10829
2 hours and 6 minutes
No.10831
Anonymous
Replies:>>10837
>>10830
Cool, thanks. If anyone can share the voting link here, I'd definitely appreciate it; same with the initial results of the poll tomorrow
No.10833
Anonymous
Image:166224158219.png(165kB, 512x384)Erics pissed.png
i swear if that lunafag made fake thread for qualifiers then i'm gonna lose it!
No.10834
Anonymous
Nominations partically close, no more new challengers.
Also less than 10 minutes to close completely the nominations.
No.10835
Anonymous
No.10836
Anonymous
Replies:>>10838
soooo, when the nomination thread dies what now? lunafag is definitely gonna try and post another thread
No.10837
Anonymous
Replies:>>10840
>>10831
Behold
https://forms.gle/a2dCCqtmtH7YqsVE7
No.10838
Anonymous
>>10836
Dumbass got themselves banned TWICE. Judging by the lack of lunafag so far it looks like they ran out of IPs
No.10839
Anonymous
Image:166226152238.png(1.04MB, 750x750)old radio.png
Seems this place might become the refuge, not just for the tournaments, but for all of 4Chan, if the doomsayers are correct!

Nominations:
https://voca.ro/11qbH3jaVZpy

Qualifiers (New!):
https://voca.ro/1nxGzbZyfv5q
No.10840
Anonymous
>>10837
Thanks so much!
No.10841
Anonymous
Image:166227478178.jpg(83kB, 360x450)1DB8E0F1-8DF9-42E5-837F-4E9613BACAFF.jpeg
Vote for Cheesecake Boeing 747 Saint Cherrywell
No.10842
Anonymous
Replies:>>10843
Are the full results posted on the wiki, like the link to where every character placed in?
No.10843
Anonymous
Replies:>>10844
No.10844
Anonymous
>>10843
OK, thanks
No.10846
Anonymous
Image:166231517213.jpg(238kB, 1416x900)B459BF2D-7AC2-49FC-8C8F-E6194A699D44.jpeg
Vote Cheesecake Boeing 747 Saint Cherrywell
No.10847
Anonymous
Replies:>>10848
When does Round 1 begin?
No.10848
Anonymous
>>10847
Less than two hours
No.10850
Anonymous
Replies:>>10851
Qualifiers are over, wat now?
No.10851
Anonymous
>>10850
I dunno, I'm painting battletech while I wait
No.10852
Anonymous
Image:166233331827.png(301kB, 692x1024)7d7390a947ffd13387a7154fa7826106.png
Hope they can make it in.
No.10853
Anonymous
Alright, wheres the round one thread?! It's been 15 MICROSECONDS AHHHH
No.10854
Anonymous
Image:166233696892.gif(2.67MB, 400x226)every year.gif
Top 32
Fang (Primal)
Queen Tyr'ahnee (Duck Dodgers)
Pacifica Northwest (Gravity Falls)
ENA (ENA)
Shego (Kim Possible)
Toph Beifong (Avatar: The Last Airbender)
Azula (Avatar: The Last Airbender)
Coraline Jones (Coraline)
Tulip Olsen (Infinity Train)
Millie (Helluva Boss)
Frankie Foster (Foster's Home For Imaginary Friends)
Buttercup (Powerpuff Girls)
Anne Boonchuy (Amphibia)
Molly McGee (The Ghost and Molly McGee)
Raven (DC Comics)
Loona (Helluva Boss)
Velma (Scooby Doo)
EVE (WALL-E)
Jucika (Jucika)
Nicole Watterson (The Amazing World Of Gumball)
Jessica Rabbit (Who Framed Roger Rabbit)
Wendy (Gravity Falls)
Alice (Alice in Wonderland)
Tigress (Kung Fu Panda)
Chel (The Road To El Dorado)
April O'Neil (TMNT)
Marceline (Adventure Time)
Mandy (The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy)
Nani Pelekai (Lilo & Stitch)
Marcy Wu (Amphibia)
Sasha Waybright (Amphibia)
Lake (Infinity Train)
No.10856
Anonymous
Replies:>>10857
Image:166234101004.jpg(69kB, 700x525)368A4E23-FC9C-4BB2-9A87-22442D3D3743.jpeg
>>10800
I’m kinda stuck at the password, Imm giving the answer but it apparently isn’t correct. What’s the correct password?
No.10857
Anonymous
Replies:>>10862
>>10856
lol, get fucked
No.10858
Anonymous
ANNE NO
No.10859
Anonymous
Replies:>>10864
Image:166236547543.jpg(377kB, 737x572)fatties get out.jpg
Is this year cursed?
No.10860
Anonymous
Replies:>>10861
Image:166237884408.jpg(101kB, 750x375)Punishedl Peterson.jpg
https://voca.ro/1csrwEkcYTsz
No.10861
Anonymous
>>10860
https://voca.ro/143JCLGIVe6I
No.10862
Anonymous
Replies:>>10863
>>10857
No legitimately, aside from Ryan Collins who the fuck is the guy supposed to be?
No.10863
Anonymous
Image:166237993012.jpg(38kB, 256x256)B36588EF-D926-4852-9543-2DA0F9C84BF5.jpeg
>>10862
>Uses one braincell

Oh… well shit I’m sorry.
No.10864
Anonymous
>>10859
It was guaranteed to get crazy with all the big players this year, at this point drama is a tradition lol
No.10866
Anonymous
Image:166239766852.jpg(15kB, 239x207)6140730.jpg
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/132790032/#132791463
No.10867
Anonymous
Image:166239862077.png(118kB, 460x420)1604349390752.png
>>10866
Honestly I'm not surprised at this point
No.10868
Anonymous
No.10872
Anonymous
Image:166241066321.png(45kB, 804x618)1662348089975.png
boorufags are jucika simps and not posting any of the slappy OC
No.10884
Anonymous
monarch confirmed
No.10892
Anonymous
https://vocaroo.com/1kQS1Mjh8vP3
No.10895
Anonymous
Well, people are accusing the hosts of corruption, fatfags rule tbe threads, and all OC has dried up because all the main girls getting art lost and the remaining ones aren’t getting art because people are legitimately worried it’ll attract spitevoters if they make OC.

Fun
No.10896
Anonymous
Replies:>>10897
>>10895
Here's hoping 2023 is better
No.10897
Anonymous
>>10896
Also Lunamedia aka the chris chan enabler exists

I will span barneyfag in the threads wish me luck.
No.10898
Anonymous
>>10895
Remember when fusefag hijacked mr /co/? sauce:
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/126242633/#q126243027
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/126224028/#126226154

Also remember gokufag?
No.10899
Anonymous
>>10898
Either this or they're industrycuck in disguise.
No.10900
Anonymous
I want anyone but the stupid propane can to win. If /co/ votes in an inanimate object for "EPIC DANK MEMES", I will unironically cheat next time for all my waifus to get in. I mean it
No.10901
Anonymous
Replies:>>10902
>>10895
>Hosts
It’s one host. Nightshift owns the poll. Fern can’t touch it. The most corrupt thing we saw was the tranny ban. Which the prior host did too.
The most Fern did was funpost.
Ghost doesn’t say anything.
No.10902
Anonymous
Replies:>>10904
>>10901
Why didn't anyone complain to Stats about 'spitevoting' the previous years, and now out of a sudden it's something the host should be responsible for?
No.10903
Anonymous
>>10898
not been feeling the goku energy just yet
No.10904
Anonymous
>>10902
Because Nightshift changed the rules without telling anyone and only told Fern about it. Ever since Princess Marco got embargo'd, people got antsy even after NSA reversed it later. We only knew it was deliberate and not a miscount from sheer nominee numbers because Fern thought it was retarded and spilled the beans. On top of that, round results take nearly an hour to post and while Anons mostly joke about it, there's some people thinking that the hosts are rigging it. But I think it was these key details:

>Nightshift (or was it Fern?) said that a character winning by a lot in round 1 started losing by a lot in the middle of the thread
>there were 1028 votes total, in contrast to the 700+ votes in the qualifiers
>all of the disney cartoons getting wiped out round 1 (Amphibia, Owl House, Molly Mcgee, etc) despite their high seeds
>the almost unnatural ties with some matches (Fang beat Desiree by only 30 votes, though this could just be my bias)
>blatant admittance to falseflagging and spitevoting
>Propane.

Add in the paranoia from last year, the OC train drying up, and stats still being MIA and replaced by a dubious, it's no wonder that everyone's crying about spitevoting.
No.10905
Anonymous
Replies:>>10906
>>10904
>>all of the disney cartoons getting wiped out round 1 (Amphibia, Owl House, Molly Mcgee, etc) despite their high seeds
Doubly so because they had 70% of the OC
No.10906
Anonymous
>>10905
I'm sorry anon but that's fucking bullshit. Slappy, Jucika, Coraline and Brisby alone have had more OC and campaign than all of them.
>B-BUT!-
Spamming the thread with shipping art is not "OC".
No.10907
Anonymous
No.10909
Anonymous
>>10906
fucking Virginia Arnoldson got more OC than any of the Amphibia girls
No.10910
Anonymous
Replies:>>10912
>>10904
No rule was changed. Nobody gave a shit about Marco since he didn't even get in the bracket even with the ban hype. It's way overblown. Stats banned trannies all the same. The nomination sheet even says who they do and don't allow. It was never hidden even from the start.
I didn't hear about a miscount. What's the lore?
>NightShift said that, and was most likely funposting.
>Votes increase from nominations to qualifiers that's not suspicious.
>4chan hates modern shows. Hazbin hotel and Helluvaboss got booted even though they're high seeds. This happens every year.
>nothing can be done about spitevoting. It also assumes anons actually made several accounts to vote. And anyone can lie say they spite voted. The amphibia characters were brigading and they still lost.
>Object rule isn't a thing apparently. So dumb fake characters like propane can get in.
OC has been made for both rounds.
No.10911
Anonymous
>>10909
>fucking Virginia Arnoldson got more OC than any of the Amphibia girls
Based
No.10912
Anonymous
Replies:>>10914
>>10910
Trannies/traps were allowed in qualifiers. With NSA only grandfather clause would allow them.
No.10913
Anonymous
It’s gotten so bad people have been advocating to replace Nightshift with Temp.
No.10914
Anonymous
Replies:>>10915
>>10912
Princess Marco and Blaue Elise both weren't allowed despite they were grandfathered in
No.10915
Anonymous
>>10914
Princess Marco was allowed. Did you even look at the fucking doc?
No.10916
Anonymous
Replies:>>10917
>>10909
Goddamn I'm missing shit cause of work, when the fuck was MonMythos qualified for this?
No.10917
Anonymous
>>10916
>when the fuck was MonMythos qualified for this?
Not the entire thing, just a few characters. Freedom for example was disqualified but Virginia was fine
No.10918
Anonymous
Replies:>>10919
Tourney's kind of boring now tbh.
No.10919
Anonymous
Replies:>>10920
>>10918
I'm rooting for Shirley, TBH
No.10920
Anonymous
>>10919
Kek, me too.
No.10921
Anonymous
Image:166249410121.png(59kB, 391x430)MM_TFW.PNG
>>10909
Little inspired to nominate Everett into Mr /co/ to see if he can follow suit
No.10922
Anonymous
Image:166249947725.jpg(755kB, 2926x4096)AE124802-022A-4EF0-AE41-918A09C7A3FD.jpeg
>Tigress starts to actually get some love and attention
>For some reason anons instantly try to demonize her for absolutely no fucking reason

Aside from the fact that one mentality deranged anon said he’d rather see a fucking propane gas win than Tigress, I genuinely don’t understand what Tigress has done to get people to hate her.
No.10923
Anonymous
>>10922
My only guess is antifurries and frogfags
No.10924
Anonymous
Time for Round 2 is over, but the poll is still open.
Better to close it before someone alters the votes, and get Nightshift called rigger.
No.10925
Orel Peterson
https://vocaroo.com/1nMVbdxbZG6H
No.10930
Anonymous
Replies:>>10931
>>10922
I don’t know but her interaction with Azula was kino.
No.10931
Anonymous
>>10930
I really hope someone screencapped that
No.10934
Anonymous
Image:166259215615.png(15kB, 643x166)Capture.PNG
Rigs confirmed
No.10936
Anonymous
Replies:>>10938
>>10934
Im at work what happen?
No.10937
Anonymous
aight what's going on NSA, explain it here
No.10938
Anonymous
Replies:>>10939
>>10936
Seemly there has been some fishy patern of voting that made NightShiftAnon suspect there has been some rigging for one lady.
According to NightShift, Fang and Propane aren't suspiciosly at all, and most anon think the ones that are being rigged are Amelia, Shirley ad Nani, but for the time being is unknown.
No.10939
Anonymous
>>10938
Welp unless it has to do with my girl getting a second chance ive already washed my hands of this for the year
No.10940
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>10941
Hello there.
No.10941
Anonymous
>>10940
General Kenobi, who be the ones riggering this round?
No.10942
Anonymous
It was the furries against F.A.R.T.S Night revealed
Tigress, Karen, Brisby, Nicole, Shirley, Judy
No.10943
Anonymous
Image:166259559304.jpg(95kB, 696x460)7926031B-B571-47DB-9FB3-84A809ECECF5.jpeg
Nightshift anon, if you’re reading this:

First off, you’re a faggot.
Second, The way you actually did the “exposing” of the rigger is flawed and retarded.

1. Your counting did not consider if the rigger was voting one character while the others were there just voting victims, which makes your claims for other candidates being rigged already insufficient to claim as “exposing the rigger”
2.Can you like… check the emails for any patterns? If you see a 20 votes in the same character, why not C+P those emails in a notepad and check for the next round if those emails appear in the same exact pattern. That’s exactly how you exactly know it was 100% rigging.
3.Shut the fuck up and never bring anything about rigging in the first place retard. If you’re talking about there being riggers, then you’re being one yourself by directly trying to influence the bracket.
No.10944
Anonymous
what was even the fucking point of bringing up the rigging if you weren't even going to ask if wanted to continue or have them removed?
I'm not voting for the rigged characters
No.10945
Anonymous
temp you are not taking over fucking stop it
No.10946
Anonymous
Replies:>>10948
Image:166259612393.jpg(16kB, 320x381)94F3C00F-15A6-4C87-97C8-6BF3CABE0830.jpeg
>>10943
Also just removing votes from the said rigger would be more than enough.
No.10947
Anonymous
>>10934
Disqualify the cheater, and make the voting pattern public to support the decision.

No mercy.
No.10948
Anonymous
Image:166259663162.jpg(45kB, 500x371)A3343EE0-E4F4-495B-8331-8CCD87A8D57E.jpeg
>>10943
>>10946
Not to fucking mention 50 votes has fuck all influence on a 1000+ vote tournament.
Like what? 5% influence?
That said Influence can be easily beaten by another rigger who is voting the opposite character, something that Nightshiftanon has taken absolutely no fucking consideration.
No.10949
Anonymous
Image:166259668865.jpg(905kB, 1875x937)Conspiracy Theory Kevin.jpg
https://voca.ro/137JOy5wEGoR
No.10950
Anonymous
Replies:>>10952
>lowercase, _____they do it for _____

FUCKING HOW!?!?!;?;!?;?;?;?!??!??!????
No.10952
Anonymous
Replies:>>10953
>>10950
>Knows about plus and /tnt/
>Doesn't know how much they get paid
How?
No.10953
Anonymous
Replies:>>10954
>>10952
Just tell me I don't know what the fuck is that word becusse fucking how plus I live in some random third world country so I didn't know better
No.10954
Anonymous
Image:166259884000.gif(2.90MB, 200x170)161344443141.gif
>>10953
No.10955
Anonymous
So what do you guys think about my idea for a different custom poll?
>Check linking origin to prevent brigading.
>Use a host that's not allowed to be linked in Twitter/Facebook/Reddit/Discord.
>Track IPs to avoid duplicate votes (schizos shouldn't vote anyways).
>A custom key on the url that can be refreshed whenever external linking is suspected to invalidate any previous link to the poll.
>30min timeout before voting with the use of custom token with a one time use.
>reCAPCTHA to avoid bots (as long as the tournament doesn't go beyond 1M uses it's free to use).
No.10956
Anonymous
Replies:>>10962
>>10955
Its sounds solid but how could it be done?
No.10957
Anonymous
Replies:>>10962
>>10955
I say we should test it first, I'm just tired of this, even after this tournament much more riggers are just going to show up and the situation will get worse.
No.10958
Anonymous
Replies:>>10959
Please tell me what Temp is saying in the thread is just made up stuff
No.10959
Anonymous
>>10958
Iggnore Temp.
No.10962
Anonymous
Replies:>>10965
>>10956
>>10957
Let me see first if I can get some more support behind. I'm all for start right now but that's some ~15 hours of work I don't want wasted
No.10965
Anonymous
Replies:>>10966
>>10962
Well, I believe in you Anon. Temp is an attentionwhore and an incompetent retard, Fern is only support, Nightshift is shady as fuck, Ghost is never around, and Numnuts is a spaz.

So yeah, I'll root for a custom site assuming you're not tourneyanon in a trenchcoat
No.10966
Anonymous
>>10965
>tourneyanon
I don't even know who that is. I'm just an autistic anon that likes to do websites.
No.10967
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
I don't get it.

I legitimately don't get it. You have a way to know exactly who only won due to cheating, you can fix the results and save the girls who got screwed over(Mothra, April, Frankie)....and yet you people don't want to? We'd have killed for something like this last time when Tourney sabotaged fucking everything, fucking riggers are everywhere. And yet despite having an out none of you want to fix the results and just let the cheaters march on.

I don't get it. Someone please explain it to me. Otherwise I'll clearly fuck off because the reaction obliviously indicates I'm in the wrong even if I don't understand how.
No.10968
Anonymous
>>10967
Nightshift is just a biased faggot is all. Takes like 30 years to get results, vetoes shit through emails and says nothing about rulechanges. Plus, he threw other contestants under the bus when its not even confirmed if the rigger was rigging a specific character and chose to choose the same ones from habit.
No.10969
Anonymous
Replies:>>10971
>>10967
Temp calm the fuck down, you can't take over the tourney on /co/ without going over with the mods first.
That seems to be your main problem, you act before asking
No.10970
Anonymous
>>10967
I saw your post and all the replies instantly where 'fuck off' so clearly these are our riggers
No.10971
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>10969
.....But that's exactly what happened to me in Tag Team last year. People didn't like my shitty qualifiers speed so ditched me and let Dominos and Tourney run things.

Then when they fucked up I did the same thing. That's how this seems to work.

Nightshift was going through a similar thing, and I wanted to go in and save the real winners so we didn't end up with ANOTHER *. I saw Spinel, I saw the aftermath of last year with what Tourney did, never again. I want the riggers punished and not allowed to continue.

Mothra, Frankie, April, must I name them all? What of our honour? Our purity? Do you WANT another 2019?

Some people seemed to agree with me.....I just thought....I just thought it would fix things
No.10972
Anonymous
>>10971
Move on.
No.10973
Anonymous
Make new poll here lol.
No.10974
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>10973
But if people actually cared they'd have backed it. Clearly the popular opinion is that the riggers are fine and it's not worth fixing anything. I made an effort, the support just isn't there......

I just don't get /co/ voters.....I guess...
No.10975
Anonymous
>>10971
Let the other anon try that new thing, if his method works then you and everyone here we can kiss rigging goodbye forever.
No.10977
Anonymous
>>10973
Ms /co/ 2022 with blackjack and hookers
No.10978
Anonymous
Replies:>>10979
>>10971
it's literally just you and me in this temp, it's so fucking gay
the only reason I can see as to why we can't do it over is some anons might miss the new poll and they'll have autism fits
No.10979
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>10978
...Am I supposed to know you? Fern, is that you?
No.10980
Anonymous
>>10979
nah I'm not fern, don't have a tripcode or name to go by just another anon
No.10981
Anonymous
>>10979
Temp, listen to what this guy is proposing. It should be the solution to all our problems.
>>10955
No.10982
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Either way, doesn't matter now, I'm banned for 60 days on /co/ so unless Fern coups Nightshift he's getting his way and allowing the rigged girls to move on.
No.10983
Anonymous
Image:166260278161.png(1.63MB, 1974x842)quite the tale mitch.png
>>10982
No.10985
Anonymous
Image:166260282132.png(262kB, 600x528)40 keksdrias.png
>>10982
git fucked
No.10988
Anonymous
>>10982
>I'm banned for 60 days on /co/
Good, think about what you've done
No.10989
Anonymous
>>10982
fucking rip
No.10992
Anonymous
Image:166260305045.png(985kB, 1365x1440)9797FCED-7539-40AA-93F3-265A6FB73D98.png
>>10982
Oh temp, you’re still incompetent as ever are you?
No.11003
Anonymous
>>10948
Every vote counts. Four of the rigged characters won due to the rigged votes.
No.11005
Anonymous
>>10943
This tourney doesn't even check emails. If the rigger voted and the pure girls were dragged into it then they would have won with the rigs removed. They didn't from the doc.
>Ignore rigging.
Go back to peru.
No.11006
Anonymous
Replies:>>11007
So are we going to overthrow NightShift?
No.11007
Anonymous
>>11006
replace him with dayshift
No.11008
Anonymous
>>10948
He said it was 100 duplicate votes. So if all dups are removed and another rigger is rigging then said characters would be removed too.
No.11009
Anonymous
I'll be real here. Propane shouldn't have gotten in in the first place. It's just an item with no character.
No.11010
Anonymous
Replies:>>11013
>>11009
You would think that we would have learned our lesson with ebony and ivory
No.11011
Anonymous
Seems that the janitor keeps deleting the deathwatch guy's posts
Shame too, seems that he took people's advice on reducing his posts and just doing highlights
No.11012
Anonymous
Replies:>>11014
>>11009
It's the one gag character that everyone looks at. Princess Marco was the same way. Banning gag picks is going against the spirit of the tourney. But now it's powered by spite and the host saying it's the only true vote amongst the controversial picks.

I just want a rules poll. Are we getting one this year?
No.11013
Anonymous
>>11009
>>11010
So who allowed this to happen, Fern, NightShift or both?
No.11014
Anonymous
>>11012
>Banning gag picks is going against the spirit of the tourney.
This gag has gone too far and it was never supposed to be allowed because it goes against the rules.
No.11015
Anonymous
Replies:>>11018
>>11013
I'm gonna go with both and they thought it wouldn't get that must traction
Just like how sneed and chuck got in and everyone thought they were gonna go far only to loose in the first round
No.11016
Anonymous
Replies:>>11078
Fern, if you're here, please reveal the emails.
We know that there's bullshit going on because you confirmed it by letting us know that there's email that'll reveal it.
You can't just reveal that there's behind the scenes shadiness and just keep the secret like this.
No.11017
Anonymous
Replies:>>11019
>>11013
Since NightShift has said time and time again he is in charge of the polls then he is responsible for letting it stay. Fern is barely here as it is.
Seems like Fern just funposts while Night handles the poll. So I'd blame him.
No.11018
Anonymous
>>11015
>only to loose in the first round
Actually they lost in the second round but i digress.
I honestly now feel bad for spite voting against Jucika considering that if i didn't it would have been a tie and she would have won by seed.
I just thought that she would have destroyed propane.
No.11019
Anonymous
Replies:>>11021
>>11017
Well Fern should get part of the blame considering he's the one NightShift got to send him all of the names.
No.11021
Anonymous
Replies:>>11024
>>11019
>he's the one NightShift got to send him all of the names.
What? Anon Night shift gets the final say. So Fern isn't even able to stop him if he tried.
What was in the emails Nightschizt apparently tried to hide? Was it incriminating or was it just casual conversation? Night hasn't even addressed them. Either it's a nothing burger or something big. But if it was something big then why didn't Fern speak up? That makes him just as complicit.
If it wasn't then Fern is attention seeking for no reason. Which makes sense because he's been attention seeking since nominations.
No.11022
Anonymous
Replies:>>11023
If you haven't voted your opinion, please help out a brother in deciding if it's worth the effort
https://strawpoll.com/polls/NMnQBKONAg6
No.11023
Anonymous
>>11022
Didn't Nightshift try this last year and it didn't pan out?

No site is free.
IPs can be changed easily.
People want pictures.

It's wasted effort because rigging will happen regardless.
No.11024
Anonymous
>>11021
Well i'm saying that Fern is the one who gave NightShift the propane name for him to use in the first place.
No.11025
Anonymous
Replies:>>11026
Where's the new thread?
No.11026
Anonymous
Replies:>>11028
>>11025
Either
A. Tournaments cancelled
B. Temp ruined our good faith with the mods
C. Its just taking a little while for some reason
No.11027
Anonymous
Is LazyDayAnon legit?
No.11028
Anonymous
>>11026
Its C. some more drama is happening behind the scenes
No.11029
Anonymous
>>11027
No, he said so himself
No.11030
Anonymous
>>11027
>Mods kept Days thread and deleted Nights
Shit
No.11031
Anonymous
Replies:>>11033
NSA can you verify if LDA is legit?
No.11033
NightShift
Replies:>>11034
>>11031
No, it's just a random posting the thread. Probably thought to do it because my router had to be reset so 10 minutes passed before I could get back on.
I have no idea who he is. Other hosts are asleep. There is no bickering going on.

But regardless even when the luna poster was here the plan was always to post a thread and if the real one was pruned then we just have to post in the fake thread with the OP. This was discussed with mods over a week ago.
No.11034
Anonymous
Replies:>>11035
>>11033
Can you clarify this on the main thread?
No.11035
NightShift
>>11034
I did but anons are more concerned about me not being the thread OP.
"Just in case it's not actually the right link. This was always the plan of action whenever someone makes another thread and jannies don't prune the right one."

To not muddy up the main board and allow the mood to get back to normal, if there's questions anons have for me I'll answer them here.
No.11036
Anonymous
Replies:>>11038
>>11035
>if there's questions anons have for me I'll answer them here
Will you be doing Mr. /co/ after all this?
What about queen and king /v/?
No.11037
Anonymous
Replies:>>11039
>>11035
Maybe you should just take a break for the night and go to sleep.
No.11038
NightShift
>>11036
I only ever wanted to host Mr./co/ that is the only tourney I ever wanted to lay claim to. I thought stats would come back for Ms. /co/ but he didn't.
I wanted other anons to be the main host of /v/'s tourneys. I only ever should be handling the nominations, vote collections, poll setup, rigging checks, and thread posting at night.

Mr. /co/ I would be the actual host. I know fuck all about vidya and /v/'s board. If someone would like to learn with me handling the legwork then I'm more than happy to just be the sheets guy for you.

The only tourney I have is Mr. /co/.
No.11039
NightShift
>>11037
I'm fine. I'm just telling what happened. To people who really want to know.
Also I know I have to post the next thread, because I don't want a spammer to ruin the tourney by pretending to be the host.
No.11040
Anonymous
Replies:>>11045
>>11039
He's not pretending, even he admitted to not being a real host.
No.11041
NightShift
Replies:>>11042
>>11039
pretending to be host and derailing the thread with a fake poll.
No.11042
Anonymous
>>11041
It's not even a fake poll.
No.11043
Anonymous
Replies:>>11045
>>11035
Why'd you make that sneaky tranny rule?
No.11044
Anonymous
Replies:>>11045
>>11035
How do we know you're the real NightShift if you don't have a trip?
No.11045
NightShift
>>11040
He also said he knew the hosts were fighting which is trying to create issues that don't exist. It was more than likely a joke, but because some anons take it seriously to continue drama posting I have to step in.
And it's not just him I'm concerned about, it's anyone pretending. If he makes the thread sure he did it the same way I would, and I would of let it slide just saying I have the next thread and explain my router needing a reset. But then he had to pretend fighting was going on which would give him credence to some anons who think he's legit.
I didn't fully read the OP I'm just reposting it just in case.

Worse if someone else does the same thing with a fake thread just to troll then I have to do the same thing again.
>>11044
I never had a trip here. Originally I was just NightShift and stayed that way. No one cares enough to impersonate me on here.

>>11043
Was never a rule. It was a host discussion. The same way other characters that are controversial are removed. All trannies weren't banned. They were just up for discussion amongst hosts. This is why loved characters like Alice were allowed in.
Marco isn't even a tranny. It's just a guy in disguise. He was grandfathered in, and I just didn't remember.
No.11046
Anonymous
Replies:>>11048
>>11045
>They were just up for discussion amongst hosts.
How about among anon's? Tired of hosts deciding tournament technicalities with no consensus or forewarning.
No.11047
Anonymous
Replies:>>11053
>>11045
Can you tell us what the deal was with Fern threatening to leak emails?
No.11048
NightShift
>>11046
The anons in threads didn't even care about the blocks for the most part. Princess Marco didn't even get in nor did any other trans character.
If you want anons to discuss something then how do you quantify that with just anonymous posts from anons you can't count?
There's simply some decisions that have to be made in the moment, and then asked about in the poll so all anons can vote. If I went by what the minority of anons voted for in nominations then you get "characters" like propane.
Rules voting comes at the end of the finals poll, and I'll ask what questions and choices anons want on the form.
No.11049
Anonymous
>>11048
Can you explain why propane is in the tournament despite just being an ordinary object?
No.11050
Anonymous
If it's any consolation NSA I think you've been doing fine, I would just suggest not engaging with the threads besides posting new ones and results. I wish I knew of a good solution to the rigging problem but I don't think there is one. Not even Stats knew what to do.
No.11051
Anonymous
Replies:>>11056
>>11048
Ideally you shouldn't change anything from the previous standard before or during the tournament. It would've been better to leave it alone altogether until after the tournament for the rules voting like you said, and then only if it caused blatant problems. Anon's before were never really complaining about tranny stipulations.
No.11052
Anonymous
Replies:>>11054
>>11049
It was a meme nomination that got lucky, but I do think we should consider addressing that issue once Ms. /co/ is over.
No.11053
NightShift
>>11047
I told Fern not to share our emails because it stirrs up anons into a tizzy. Most hosts try to interact as little as possible so anons can make OC and have fun without being concerned about everything we say.

It's like the creepy janitor trying to join in on the fun a real mood killer.

What was in the emails? The same stuff I'm telling you.

>I'm only interested in Mr. /co/
>No I'm not rigging I don't care about this tourney other than keeping it going and fair.
>If there's characters that are controversial discuss them with us.
>I need to find a host for the other tourneys who aren't fusefag or Tourney anon and know board culture.
>Stop trolling in the threads.

I ignored him, because there's nothing of consequence in the emails. I just didn't want to make unnecessary stress for anons trying to have fun.
No.11054
NightShift
>>11049
See
>>11052
Just like last year where a bunch of guys who were in disguise got in, the objects were just silly little gags. I have actually been watching the propane matches just to see if it is cheating so I could alert anons immediately. It's why results took a bit to show in other rounds.
In the first round a contestant was almost voted out due to rigging, but anons handled it and round two they got rid of almost all of the cheaters but one from what I remember.
For this round I just wanted to watch propane again to kick it out for cheating if it started.
I removed 100 duplicate votes. Saw propane was still winning, checked the round one cheater and she was losing in the sheets but winning in the poll. Then I checked all characters. It's when I saw each of these girls cheating into a win.

Rigging happens for all characters. But it is only when they move forward when they shouldn't that it becomes a problem.
No.11055
Anonymous
>>11054
And yet, you didn’t toss the votes and allow the real winners to proceed?
No.11056
NightShift
Replies:>>11063
>>11051
Anons never got to vote on it to decide. Plenty complained about them, but none ever made bracket. I felt like it would cause issues especially knowing the site we are on. So I made the decision to restrict them but discuss with hosts.
Fern did not want to discuss with me, and just did his own thing. Which to be fair, removed a literal building from a popular meme. It would have been better if Fern actually took the time to discuss things with me before he did them instead of rushing to anons to "blackmail?" me with things I make obvious in the docs.

In the nominations sheet it states characters I'm not allowing in. I should have reiterated anons could make arguments for why their character should get in.
No.11057
Anonymous
trump won
and by a lot
No.11058
Anonymous
>>11055
I could see why NSA might feel that's dishonest. I think it would've been the best thing to do in hindsight, but I can see why he'd think being honest is the best course of action, especially considering how people are still mad over a contest from three years ago. And this whole thing has brought to light the ugly truth that there's probably never been a clean win in any of these contests, it's too easy to rig.
No.11059
Anonymous
Replies:>>11062
>>11054
So do you regret letting in propane?
No.11060
NightShift
>>11055
If I start tossing votes anons become suspicious. What happens when I toss votes, but the poll says different? The poll is what anons go by.
It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't.

So the next best thing was to tell anons and figure out where to go next. Most said tell them who the cheaters are, and move on with the rounds to let anons handle it in their votes.
I wanted to push the right girls forward, but was advised against it by anons. There were several good ideas, but at this point I had to make a choice and move the event along.

In the finals I can ask what anons want done to characters who rig?

>Move to the next round and alert anons.
>Say nothing.
>Move them to the next round with their past opponent, and have a three way vote.
>Remove them myself and alert anons then show proof of rigging.
No.11061
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>11073
I can comprehend getting stuck with something you never wanted to do, you know? Wilkinsposting was supposed to be a one off meme while I tried to figure out what to do with Dan, but people really really liked it. And I had to keep going and going until I broke down.

You don’t seem like a bad guy. I’m sorry this happened to you. You don’t deserve the wrath of 4chan. You deserve something? So do I after all I’ve done. But not quite that.

But you fucked up. Unlike me, or Stats in 2019, you had a pretty damn good idea who was rigged in. Frankie, Shego, Mothra, and April were robbed. You had the power to fix it and the proof to back it up. And you didn’t. And you’ve probably condemned whoever wins to an eternal asterisk…just like Tourney did last year. I tried to fix Tag Team, and there was too much to fix. You had a fixable problem, and you didn’t fix it. And for that, I will forever be mad. If the new guy decided to start the current round over with the right girls in I would back it, assuming it’s not ducking Tourney again.

Patience, my friend. Perhaps sometime you’ll get your dream job. Perhaps someday I’ll get mine. But I don’t think either of us were quite ready to handle the heat.

We’ll never be Stats. Never.
No.11062
NightShift
>>11059
I only regret it if anons vote for the object rule.

My only true regret is what happened to Nyarly, because I didn't word myself properly.
No.11063
Anonymous
Replies:>>11073
>>11056
>Anons never got to vote on it to decide.
Well then wait after the tournament to have that vote.
>Plenty complained about them
Not really. They're pretty much understood to be a joke that gets R1 the farthest, but regardless it's a standard that shouldn't be changed prior with your own consultation. As you see changing it caused more drama than if you had just let it alone, and set a bad tone for your status as host.
No.11064
Anonymous
>>11060
In retrospect it's surprising we didn't figure out a protocol for rigging after Spinel and then (probably) Emmy.
No.11065
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>11060
If this was a Spinel situation where it was caught months late or like Tag Team last year where the whole thing was rotten to the start, I could absolutely understand that. But you had a pretty damn good method for sniffing it out. You had the data. You had a chance.

Frankie Foster. Mothra the Kaiju. April O’Neil. Shego. They were robbed today. Robbed of perhaps their last chance at the E8.

Shirley, Karen, Nicole, the 4th one, they are illegitimate, and I can only hope they fail hard. They don’t deserve any more.
No.11066
Anonymous
>>11065
Bro don't be so fucking dramatic
No.11067
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
If Ms. and Mr. /co/ are truly our boards grand traditions, something we started and can be proud of, then we ought to treat them with dignity. I’m frankly appalled at the rapid decline in quality since 2020. I miss Stats. And frankly I failed myself last year at trying to solve a rigging situation. But just ignoring it will lead to asterisk winners and a lot of very bitter fans who will be spitevoting into the future. The worse the spitevoting problem and rigging problem get the more innocent OC makers are hurt. We ought to fix the problem with haste and yet I’ve seen very little.

….Is Fern here?
No.11068
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
I can’t even bear to look on the thirds on /co/ right now. The chaos has run wild and driven most of the good OC makers away.


What have we done….
No.11069
Anonymous
Replies:>>11070
Anyway when this is over I propose we make a thread here to hash out a system for when rigging is suspected/confirmed, that way future hosts know what to do. Now I'm going to bed, don't let the fags get to you NSA.
No.11070
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>11069
I will argue for tossing out confirmed or highly suspect votes and resetting a round if a cheater got in until the cows come home. NS had everything at his disposal to do that, he didn’t, and look where it got us. If the Janitors weren’t a problem I’d still want him to just fucking undo it and give Mothra and Frankie their rightful places
No.11071
Anonymous
Replies:>>11072
>>11065
out of these I only cared for Mothra, she could've won it and those digits she got would've been memetic poetry
No.11072
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>11074
>>11071
I still feel bad for Frankie being screwed over in 2019 by Spinel and last year by the spite psyop. She needed a comeback and to have it stolen again is just sad. Same with Shego and her curse. Mothra was just fun, and I never liked that bat rabbit thing. No comment on April. Those are the legit results. April, Mothra, Frankie, and Shego were robbed, plain and simple. 2 of them were going to the Elite 8 and cheaters will take their place. I am not happy. Not happy at all. The whole E8 will be an * because confirmed cheaters will be getting in.

I can only pray Raven wins. She’s the most legit contestant left and she has the same history of being screwed over as Frankie.
No.11073
NightShift
>>11061
First off, making that kind of decision is the worst thing I could have done, and it's the exact reason why you aren't in charge. Anons don't want another Captain America, or Tag Team tourney. Jannies don't want a repeat of rounds there is a timeframe that jannies allow this tourney on the board. You have no idea how to host.

Second off you will never host again. Nobody wants you. You are the entire reason I'm even hosting Ms. /co/ in the first place. I have done 3 tourneys back to back. Enjoy (you)r ban from the board.

>>11063
Anon Alice from Superjail got 50 votes.
Marco with a boost got 89.
The girl with the most votes has 249 votes. Most anons did not care and others argued it shouldn't be in. The complaints died out less than a thread later. If it was truly a big issue anons would have spoken up for far longer.
But I do see what you are saying and I agree, big decisions shouldn't just be decided.
But the problem is in the moment when should a host step in? Each host will veto a character they find controversial in nominations. It was said to step in when Propane got voted in, but then where do I draw the line? By posts? By nominations votes?
There will always be a Propane or Marco in these tourneys. Either spite voted up, or just something funny people want in. In Queen /v/ the set of guns were voted out by the anons without host interference.
No.11074
Anonymous
Replies:>>11075
>>11072
>acting this fucking biased
Well, I understand why you aren't hosting anything.
No.11075
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>11074
The only character I ever had significant bias for was in the men’s tournament and I let him die in R1 in Tag last year. I’m a lot of things, but a biased rigger aint one of them.

I mean, I’ve never even seen a piece of media with April O Neil or Mothra in it. I just know they won and the cheaters didn’t
No.11077
fern avatarfag !ma9qovM58k
>>11067
Temp, go away.
No.11078
fern avatarfag !ma9qovM58k
Replies:>>11100
>>11016
I'm not revealing the emails for two reasons.
Firstly, there's not really anything to reveal. It's just NightShift being NightShift. My threat was just to get him to resolve the situation in a timely manner.
Secondly, despite everything that has happened I do want to see this tournament to the end and would prefer to avoid any further shitstorms.
>>11009
I've been refraining from talking about the propane situation because they're still in the running, but I will say that letting items in was NightShift's idea.
No.11079
Anonymous
Replies:>>11088
>>11067
>If Ms. and Mr. /co/ are truly our boards grand traditions,
They aren't.
>something we started and can be proud of,
There's nothing to be proud of.
>then we ought to treat them with dignity.
There is not, and will never be, any dignity associated with this.

NightShift is a cool fren, he explains himself rationally, makes it clear that he's just trying to make the best of a bad situation, and expresses doubts like a normal human bean. You're a moron who's convinced that you're always right no matter what, which is why you tried to split the vote and NEARLY GOT THE WHOLE EVENT BANNED even when most people were telling you to sit down and shut up. Your gigantic ego has an inflated sense of your own usefulness and skill, despite the fact that you are ridiculously incompetent, as shown by the fact that your competing threads and polls weren't even done correctly. The sooner you leave, the better.
No.11081
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Yeah I’ve done enough. Nobody cared so I’m deleting the fixed poll.

FYI Frankie would have absolutely wrecked Shego based on what I saw, and April would be moving on too. Won’t mention the other results to avoid messing up the main poll
No.11082
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>11084
Or…I would have. I keep getting incorrect password error so I dunno
No.11084
Black Hand ## Developer
Replies:>>11086
>>11082
You might have inadvertently deleted your cookies.
No.11086
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>11084
Oh ok.

What are cookies and how do they work?
No.11087
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Actually wait never mind I think I figured it out
No.11088
Anonymous
>>11079
Not him but this post is just pessimistic.
No.11089
Anonymous
>>11086
Congrats Temp you're the new Yoel.
No.11090
Anonymous
So what are your thoughts on Fang possibly getting rigged by /trash/ scalies?
No.11092
Anonymous
Replies:>>11094
Image:166266889403.png(183kB, 723x666)merigging.png
I said this year felt like a climax of sorts and now I see how. it's the year its legitimacy is completely, openly thrown out the window and will never recover. I kneel to the riggerchads.
No.11093
Black Hand ## Developer
>>11086
>What are cookies and how do they work?

Cookies are delicious delicacies.
No.11094
Anonymous
>>11092
So, is there any point in doing it in 2023?
No.11095
Anonymous
>>11094
see how far your girl gets before getting btfo by riggers or falseflagged rigging turns people against her. The eventual winner would be the survivor of the spiters and riggers cancelling eachother out
No.11096
Anonymous
>>11094
well yeah there is, so long as people want to do it
let's wait until Mr./co/ ends and we'll have a more broader picture
hell maybe years 6-10 we swap ms/mr times around so mr is in september and ms in october
No.11097
Anonymous
>>11094
We're too far in to stop now
No.11098
Anonymous
Wew the propane tank got eliminated, thank god otherwise hank would never get to participate ever again
No.11099
Anonymous
Replies:>>11101
Image:166268153916.png(67kB, 821x1100)deshrug.png
>>11094
If hundreds of people still wanna do it then yeah I guess. It's prestige has been radically devalued though. Basically just become a place to waifu and OC dump and funpost.
It was probably my fault for ever taking it even a little serious though.
No.11100
Anonymous
Replies:>>11102
>>11078
So can you tell us what you think about propane now?
No.11101
Anonymous
>>11099
As the coom oc artist for dem, it's the only place to draw something and be creative.
the polls are just fluff. but the fun of cheering on my gurl will always be fun.
No.11102
fern avatarfag !ma9qovM58k
>>11100
a mistake
No.11103
Anonymous
Replies:>>11105
>>11102
can you explain why you kept attentionfagging? it was to the deficient of the tourney.
No.11104
Anonymous
Replies:>>11105
>>11102
Can you explain the feud you guys were having? Why did you keep trying to shit on the other hosts? And is it true you guys were fightiong and that's why you didn't post the night thread?
No.11105
fern avatarfag !ma9qovM58k
Replies:>>11112
>>11104
what do you mean by the "night thread"? I just make threads during the day so Nightshift can rest.
As for the feud, we have different views on interacting with the thread. I think audiences should be up to date on what the hosts are discussing, Nightshift thinks doing so leads to unnecessary worry. And I can see that somewhat.
>>11103
The jokes during nominations and qualifiers were because I thought it'd be funny.
Threatening to leak the emails was, in hindsight, really retarded. I should have at least given him a lighter nudge before I started throwing that around. So, sorry, fwiw.
No.11106
Anonymous
Replies:>>11107
>>10800
>get banned till the end of ms co cuz i posted lewd OC
bros i cant take this
No.11107
Anonymous
Image:166269425500.jpg(78kB, 680x838)1660322099621897.jpg
>>11106
No.11108
Anonymous
Ghost up to make the next thread?
No.11110
Anonymous
Replies:>>11111
>>11102
I know right.
A lot of good girls got robbed because of it.
No.11111
Anonymous
Replies:>>11114
>>11110
Except Jucika.
No.11112
Anonymous
>>11105
Lazy day anon said you were arguing. Which is why the thread wasn’t posted. Sounds accurate tbqh based on how you’ve acted towards him so far.
>Nightshift thinks doing so leads to unnecessary worry.
It did. Hosts don’t bring their conversations into the thread. You’re supposed to speak to each other. You caused a lot of anons to believe night was hiding things and it led to them shitting on your other host for no other reason than for you to have fun at his expense.
You knew he was checking for rigging then rushed him to reveal shit fucking over the other girls for every tourney to come. Brisby is gonna get asterisked and so is Shirley and Nicole, because you thought it was funny to kick a guy when he’s down. What was your advice when he discovered rigging that round?
No.11113
fern avatarfag !ma9qovM58k
Replies:>>11115
>>11112
first of all lazy day is a fag who is not host
secondly, nightshift had already checked for rigging by the time he made his initial post. he said he was going to double check, but he was mainly asking what should be done about it.
when I threatened to leak the emails, 40 minutes had already passed. If you don't think that's enough time, alright, but I do and I wanted some sort of resolution to the whole ordeal. I'm fine with the decision he came to, even if it's not perfect.
No.11114
Anonymous
>>11111
checked
No.11115
Anonymous
Replies:>>11125
>>11112
>>11113
I think we've gotten all the info out of this incident that we can, I don't see a point to continue arguing about it
No.11116
Anonymous
Image:166273294250.jpg(21kB, 253x300)Spoiler image
This tournament, the shitshow, the rigging? It was me.
No.11117
Anonymous
Image:166274776082.jpg(149kB, 905x1280)1505619236.png
Got banned on 4chan until Monday for posting Nicole lewds. Have some Nicole cute instead. VOTE NICOLE!
No.11118
Anonymous
Image:166274851352.jpg(6kB, 480x360)point and laugh.jpg
>>11117
No.11119
Anonymous
Image:166275497817.jpg(25kB, 480x480)1618940454165.jpg
>>11117
No.11120
Anonymous
Image:166275955785.jpg(35kB, 672x500)1658811050708340.jpg
>>11117
No.11121
Anonymous
Image:166276595140.png(496kB, 787x726)db8jnbx-a0469304-a203-40a8-81e5-c75635ae5e6a.png
SHE DID IT! SHE MADE IT TO THE SEMI FINALS!
No.11122
NightShift
Why post it here? To not fill up the main thread with rulesfagging.

Post questions or rules you want voted on IN THE FINALS with solutions included.
Current questions and solutions.

What should hosts do when they dicover a character rigging and winning unjustly due to it?
>Say nothing and let them through.
>Say nothing and remove rigged votes (this means you will only see results through google sheets) and push the true winner through. (this makes the next round take longer to post and set up)
>Alert the voters and reveal who rigged in the thread show the real amount, and then let them through.

Should a character be sentient? Aka not just an object, unless they are treated like a character such as Plank.
>No
>Yes

Should gag characters be allowed in? Ie men/women in disguise/objects/etc (Princess Marco, Propane)
>No
>Yes
>Yes, only if they make it in through qualifiers
>Yes, but only one.

Should trans characters be allowed in?
>Yes
>No


If you have other questions or solutions feel free to offer them.
No.11123
Anonymous
>>11122
>Say nothing and let them through
>No
>No
>No
No.11124
Anonymous
Image:166276671227.jpg(371kB, 1200x675)23D41E38-3A31-4F08-90D0-F3AE821A3B70.jpeg
>>11122
>Should a character be sentient?

Nigga, this isn’t a rule?
Aside from the plank, what other non-sentient motherfucker is there? Even the said character in question isn’t that noteworthy of a character, literally being 1-1 as a gag character.
No.11125
Anonymous
>>11115
I think so as well. I think it's safe to say that a solid rules vote will help improve the process and prevent things like these specific instances from reoccurring.

There will ALWAYS be some dumb bullshit when we're talking about the autism of /co/ let loose, but process improvement does just that. It improves things.
No.11126
Anonymous
>>11124
Yeah it isn't a rule because nobody thought Propane would qualify and then almost make it to the elite 8.
No.11127
NightShift
>>11123
This is not a vote here. That is in the finals of the tourney.
>>11124
Cartoons are made every year. This is just future proofing. Non sentient characters are usually for laughs, but can also take off in a tourney due to spite. There are objects in plenty of shows that have names but are just imagined from stress or Wilson parodies.
No.11129
Anonymous
>>11122
>What should hosts do when they dicover a character rigging and winning unjustly due to it?
Alert the voters and reveal who rigged them, then remove the rigged votes and determine from that. Might take a while, but it's better to get that shit out of the way sooner rather than just making a mess of things and don't say a thing
>Should a character be sentient?
If it's treated like a legittimate character, then sure, go nuts
>Should gag characters be allowed in?
Qualifiers aside, where pretty much everyone makes it in, do gag characters even get in the tournament frequently? If they make it through the qualifiers, might as well let them stay
>Should trans characters be allowed in?
Do these types of characters even make it in? Because I've never seen a single one of 'em even making it past the qualifiers, let alone be nominated. What are they even gonna nominate? Fucking Questionable Content characters?
No.11131
NightShift
Replies:>>11132
>>11129
I'll add that response to the list of answers.

Propane made it in, and all it really takes is some dedicated anons to push em through. There were Questionable content characters in the qualifiers, Sally Mae is a man and so is Alice from Super Jail. It's more so because just like gag charaters they can be powered by spite and this leads to anger from voters. Trannies, objects, disguise charaters are mostly gag or trolling canidates. So if they make it in they can pick up steam.
No.11132
Anonymous
Replies:>>11143
>>11131
you can't remove spite, if objects and trannies are gone then the spite voters would just latch onto any character they can
trying to stop spite is just an unwinnable battle that's just not the effort to prevent
No.11133
Anonymous
Replies:>>11145
>>11122
Alert the voters and get rid of the riggers.
Yes.
Yes, only if they make it through qualifiers.
Yes, doubt it'll help much though.
No.11134
Anonymous
Replies:>>11136
>>11129
>Do these types of characters even make it in? Because I've never seen a single one of 'em even making it past the qualifiers, let alone be nominated. What are they even gonna nominate? Fucking Questionable Content characters?
There's trans characters in hazbin or helluva boss.
No.11135
Anonymous
Replies:>>11145
>>11122
Alert the voters.

>Should a character be sentient? Aka not just an object, unless they are treated like a character such as Plank.
No.

>Should gag characters be allowed in? Ie men/women in disguise/objects/etc (Princess Marco, Propane)
Yes. Isn't having to make it through qualifiers a given?

>Should trans characters be allowed in?
Yeah.
No.11136
Anonymous
>>11134
yeah but they're not popular enough to get in
No.11137
Anonymous
Replies:>>11145
>>11122
>What should hosts do when they dicover a character rigging and winning unjustly due to it?
TBH I have no idea what to do with rigged contestants. I guess the 3rd option.
>Should a character be sentient? Aka not just an object, unless they are treated like a character such as Plank.
No. meme picks are fun
>Should gag characters be allowed in? Ie men/women in disguise/objects/etc (Princess Marco, Propane)
No.
>Should trans characters be allowed in?
hell no

I think matches should be randomized from now on. It would really help prevent metagaming. Metagaming has gone to far this year and the last and I think it's time we do something about it.
No.11138
Anonymous
>>11122
1. The second option. waiting isn't as big a deal as the anons make it look.
2. Yes
3.No
4.Yes (cannot be eligible for the tourney of the opposite gender)
No.11139
Anonymous
>>11123
Why say no to the second rule when you also say no to the third rule?
No.11140
Anonymous
man these results are horrible
No.11141
Anonymous
>>11122
>2nd
>No
>Yes
>Yes
No.11142
Anonymous
>>11122
I'm undecisive about the others but first question go for second one
No.11143
NightShift
>>11132
I agree but others might not see it that way. But if a character was spite voted up then at least it was a character. Which is some people's view. So I can understand their point of view.
No.11144
Anonymous
Replies:>>11146
>>11122
1. I have no idea why "let the rigged votes through" is even a fucking option. Why run these things at all at that point? Just remove them and push who they would've beaten through. If you're cheating so much that you get caught that should be a forfeit.
2. Sentient or sapient? They're not the same thing.
3. Yes, they're not gonna make it past qualifiers anyway
4. Yes, they're not gonna make it past qualifiers anyway. I'll agree to locking them into one tournament though.
No.11145
NightShift
>>11135
>Yes. Isn't having to make it through qualifiers a given?
Yes. Isn't having to make it through qualifiers a given?
I messed up the last option.
>>11133
>Alert the voters and get rid of the riggers.
I'll add this option.
>>11137
>Should a character be sentient? Aka not just an object, unless they are treated like a character such as Plank.
No. meme picks are fun
>Should gag characters be allowed in? Ie men/women in disguise/objects/etc (Princess Marco, Propane)
No.

You contradicted yourself. Gag and meme characters are the same.

>I think matches should be randomized from now on. It would really help prevent metagaming. Metagaming has gone to far this year and the last and I think it's time we do something about it.

I will add this to the poll. But you also might get subpar finals. If all the big girls go against each other then you get boring finals. If a seed 127 goes against a seed 4 then you know the real winner right there. Low seeds usually fight their way up and campaigning is the best way for that to happen. Frankie has no campaigning, and you see losses in some girls who don't campaign.
No.11146
NightShift
>>11144
1. I have no idea why "let the rigged votes through" is even a fucking option.
It was some anons requested answer.
2.)It's more specifically targeting objects not arguing sapience. That is too in depth for me to do. Really just being alive and more of a "character".
No.11147
Anonymous
Replies:>>11150
>>11146
What are you gonna do about the latest /trash/ rigging controversy.
No.11148
Anonymous
Replies:>>11150
>>11146
>It was some anons requested answer.
There were also some anons that suggested cancelling the entire tournament. And that's ironically more sensible than letting blatant cheating rock.
As for the objects/sentience/character debate I say let them all in on qualifiers, same as the memes and trans.
No.11149
Anonymous
Replies:>>11150
>>11122
Just want to say I disagree with the notion that characters that got rigged for should be called out. Whether you let them through or not, it will completely ruin the following threads like what happened this time to Round 4. Also it will allow rigging to be weaponized, not to have characters win but to have them shamed.
"Say nothing and remove rigged votes" is the only correct way.
No.11150
NightShift
Replies:>>11151
>>11147
I don't have a way to check who is rigging from what board, discord, facebook, etc. I'm not the CIA.
I'm also not reading the threads right now, so if you can explain the issue to me I'd appreciate it.
>>11148
I agree ignoring it is ridiculous, there's rules for a reason. But anons have actually voted out rigged characters since round 1 without my help.
>>11149
The only rigging that gets mentioned is rigging that enabled a win for the round. But I agree. I don't want to shame girls and ruin their chances in the current tourney and next.
No.11151
Anonymous
>>11150
>I'm also not reading the threads right now, so if you can explain the issue to me I'd appreciate it.
OK.
Well it has recently been found out that people on /trash/ has been rigging for Fang ever since the qualifiers.
No.11152
Anonymous
Replies:>>11153
>>11151
Crossposting to other BOARDS isn't rigging imo, at least not on the same level as dumping a link in a private discord server is. You have no way of knowing how many people in /trash/ voted for Fang or anyone else or how many of them frequent /co/.
No.11153
Anonymous
Replies:>>11154
>>11152
Allow me to raise another question.
How do we know if one of them isn't rigging with dozens of alt accounts?
No.11154
Anonymous
Replies:>>11155
>>11153
How do we know they aren't?
No.11155
Anonymous
Replies:>>11157
>>11154
And how do we know if only a small amount of people from /trash/ voted? Or if they don't care about /co/ and just want to see their fetish character win?
No.11156
NightShift
>>11151
I need to wait until after the threads to explain what I noticed. But the trash accusations of rigging on Fang make less sense when I explain things I saw after the tourney ends.
No.11157
Anonymous
>>11155
There's no way to know or tell. And guess what's going to happen if you making cross-boarding a bannable offense? People are going to do exactly that to get the characters they don't like kicked.
No.11159
Anonymous
>>11122
>What should hosts do when they dicover a character rigging and winning unjustly due to it?
Say nothing and remove the rigged votes. Avoids drama.

>Should a character be sentient? Aka not just an object, unless they are treated like a character such as Plank.
No, unless like you said they are treated like an actual character. Objects being referred to as a particular sex, like a boat traditionally might be, are not female. They lack character. Plank is a character as they are treated like one.

>Should gag characters be allowed in? Ie men/women in disguise/objects/etc (Princess Marco, Propane)
Only Princess Marco to honour the grandfather clause.

>Should trans characters be allowed in?
No.
No.11162
NightShift
Replies:>>11167
>>11159
The grandfather clause would allow in Propane too.
No.11164
Anonymous
Replies:>>11169
NSA we need a new thread
No.11166
Anonymous
What actually is wrong with tranny characters if they are considered female in the show?
No.11167
Anonymous
>>11162
Hey Nightshift, did you read what >>10955 brought up? This could be the solution to all our problems. Well, in general, not using Google Forms would be the one solution to everything.
No.11169
NightShift
>>11164
Sorry I'm a bit slow tonight trying to set up Mr. /co/'s dates with the jannies and announce it in the thread.
No.11170
NightShift
>>11167
I'm just responding to you right now to let you know I'll read it in a moment.
No.11171
NightShift
>>11167
I've been looking for alts to google forms since last year. So yes I'm very interested! I just couldn't find a poll that was either free or inexpesnsive for me to use. We'd need to test it on here first before it would ever be implemented in a main tourney.
No.11172
DeathWatch Announcers !Ep8pui8Vw2!!QYFNkxPrs0C
Image:166279090000.jpg(134kB, 938x386)Banned death.jpg
>>10800
To the person who predicted I'd get banned, your prediction
Well I had a nice time with this event despite the hiccups
Hope to see you all for the other tourneys
No.11175
Anonymous
Video:166280439613.mp4(2.57MB / 0:00:16 / avc1, 1920x1080)this_was_a_long_time_ago.mp4
>>10800
Season 1 or bust.
No.11176
Anonymous
Replies:>>11177
>>11159
What about Blaue Elise?
No.11177
Anonymous
Replies:>>11181
>>11176
Isn't that just the anteater? We taking a male character except for one country as a girl? Cool, I nominate Ruby from Steven universe. She was a man in Russia. Oh and because the aardvark is nominated for Ms /co/ then he can't be in Mr /co/ because it's the same character.
No.11179
Anonymous
As I’ve done every year (the results have no bearing on my position) I am advocating for the elimination of Elite 8 exclusion rule.
The Elite 8 was created in 2018 because people were afraid the same girls would win every year. We’ve had 4 years since then, and this HAS NOT come to pass. Tastes clearly change every year.

The Elite 8 exclusion rule should be removed for the following reasons:
A. The handicap makes the win less special
B. The E8 causes narratives/fanbases to be broken because so much happens every year, giving an unfair advantage to non E8ters (see martianfags)
C. E8 gives more room in the bracket for spite, memes and top seed fodder like this year. Meanwhile, obscure characters that actually have fans do well.
D. E8 exclusion does all of the above, without any benefit. Reinstate the competition to its no holds barred glory. Vote No on E8, and see a tournament that is simply unriggable (too many girls people like participating)
No.11180
Anonymous
Replies:>>11182
No.11181
Anonymous
Replies:>>11194
>>11177
Look, all I'm saying is its a double standard to let Princess Marco in while denying other characters who have a similar thing. Elise was grandfathered in as she made it to Qualifiers last year. I'll never nominate Elise again, I have a lot of more traditional waifus
No.11182
Anonymous
>>11180
If 2018 was the gold standard, maybe we could learn a thing or two from it. The original ruleset has a 100% success rate.
No.11183
Anonymous
Replies:>>11185
>>11179
That's an awful idea. It would just turn into GameFAQs tournaments where the same few characters always make it to quarter-finals. If anything it would just encourage more spite-voting so the same characters aren't in Elite Eight year after year, effectively making the removal of that rule pointless. How many characters would even benefit from removing the rule? I can only think of Eggman and Kiryu.
No.11185
Anonymous
Replies:>>11214
>>11183
The data points to this not being the case, if it was, the E8 would swap out every year and former E8 members would win every year. Neither has happened.

I’m only talking about /co/ I don’t know how /v/s tournaments have gone and its none of my business.

>Who would benefit
Everyone, since there would be less power for Spite (too many girls to take down) and memes (will lose eventually). The E8 has only harmed Ms /co/ since its inception, and was ratified by people mad that a popular girl won a waifu contest. We have enough data to know that this “same result over and over” nonsense is hogwash.
No.11187
Anonymous
Replies:>>11189
>>11179
We got three returnees this year. Out of them, one is likely going to sweep the entire tournament and another got in with next to no campaigning. The rule is fine.
No.11189
Anonymous
Replies:>>11190
>>11187
Fang is only sweeping because her show is ending right now, it has nothing to do with the E8.
No.11190
Anonymous
>>11189
This. Fang is in a similar position Ms. Dr. Monarch was in, a beloved show about to end versus a beloved show that was cancelled. Chel, Nicole, and Shirley's franchises on the other hand haven't had new content in years.
No.11191
Anonymous
Replies:>>11192
In case there's a consensus on trashing the Elite Eight rule after Ms. /co/ ends, will it still apply for Mr. /co/ this year?
No.11192
Anonymous
>>11191
The characters who were going win were going to be the same characters from the elite 8. Only reason they are out is because of rigging. Any retard who agrees to this should be killed.
No.11193
Anonymous
Replies:>>11195
>>11192
I don't agree with it anyway, I was only asking just in case.
No.11194
Anonymous
Replies:>>11196
>>11181
Elise is not the same as P Marco. It's not a silly concept or gag. It's just the same character but in a different language. It opens the flood gate to more of the same character, and they would be blocked from entering the tourney they should be in.

Elise didn't make it to brackets. That's not grandfathered in.
No.11195
Anonymous
Replies:>>11207
>>11193
Nightshift don't add this stupid fucking question. It will just lead to the same girls in the top 8 every time.
No.11196
Anonymous
>>11194
Alright, I see your point.
No.11197
Anonymous
>>11192
Lmao no
No.11200
Anonymous
Image:166285129258.jpg(53kB, 750x747)bb6.jpg
Hey, can someone do me a favor and post this in the thread?
I'd do it myself but i'm banned.
No.11201
Anonymous
>Chel lost by four votes
This doesn't feel right... especially when she has been rigged for before.
No.11202
Anonymous
Image:166285150726.png(335kB, 958x595)ff2.png
Aww, she lost. But third or fourth place isn't so bad I guess. At least she made it this far. Much better than people were expecting.
No.11203
Anonymous
Honestly it's not that Chel lost, it's that she lost to a character who's only in the Elite 8 due to rigging.
How those many people can actually vote for Shirley at this point is beyond my understanding and comprehension.
No.11205
Anonymous
>>11203
At this point I may vote for Shirley so she can't appear again and not start another rigging-accusing shenanigans.
Also, if Fang lost she wouldn't appear next year, and she would not be as popular the year after than, so in some way, is a double win.
No.11206
Anonymous
>>11205
Don't do it.
A Shirley win is an undeserved win. Vote for who deserves it more.
No.11207
Anonymous
>>11195
Verifiably false and put it up.
No.11208
Anonymous
>>11203
I honestly blame the /trash/ rigging.
There's at least several furfags who wandered into the tournament from there because of it.
No.11209
Anonymous
Replies:>>11210
>>11192
Any retard who looks at the past 5 years and think gimping top tiers is a good idea after years of spitevotes, memefaggotry and FOTM domination is in denial.

The E8 has no consistent pattern, and neither do these tournaments. It needs to go for the health of the contest.
No.11210
Anonymous
>>11209
Not him but NightShift himself confirmed that two of the Elite 8 are rigged for.
Apologies if you were agreeing and if that's the case then i misunderstood your post.
No.11211
Anonymous
Replies:>>11213
Did you REALLY not put in the E8 vote after this year?
No.11212
Anonymous
Replies:>>11231
Image:166285344140.jpg(57kB, 885x568)1445B9EF-19A5-4FEE-876D-A43D14A6E27B.jpeg
I think Shirley has went a bit too far now and this is coming as someone who supported Shirley up until the elite eight.

Like, the character I didn’t know even existed in a fucking show i watched as child apparently beat some of the most iconic characters in the fucking board unironically baffles me. No amount of campaign would has such an effect man, and she’s already outed as rigging target since the fucking start. I like Shirley, but she’s literally the most unworthy character for a Ms. /co/ title in the fucking tourney. I can name more than seventy characters that didn’t make into qualifiers that are more worthy of a Ms. /co/ title than her. I could tolerate her a bit when she entered quarter finals but then the semi finals and the fucking finals???

She is without a doubt, the least deserving character of a Elite eight status of any character in any tournament in 4chan.
No.11213
Anonymous
Replies:>>11214
>>11211
What do you mean?
You could have voted for the 5-8th spots.
No.11214
Anonymous
Replies:>>11225
>>11213
The E8 exclusion clause.
See:
>>11179
>>11185

The "Back and forth" theory of girls trading off on odd years now has two full cycles of not being the case.

Fang will almost certainly win, but it's because her show is ending, so it's more of a Spinel situation than a genuine E8 win.

The E8 rule was drafted out of fear and no information, we now have a ton of information that says top tiers are not in balance with the rogues. 2018 was our most balanced year and we should return to form, or suffer the same spiterigging fate for the THIRD year in a row.
No.11216
Anonymous
>>11205
Shirley won't have the rigging energy in 2 years time, but do yo want to see fang gang over and over again?
No.11217
Anonymous
are voters from off-board worse than voters that're off-site?
No.11218
Anonymous
Replies:>>11230
>>11217
Not at all. /trash/ raiding Ms. /co/ isn't as bad as Discord or Facebook groups raiding.
No.11219
Anonymous
No.11222
Anonymous
>>11217
Off board at least browses /co/ sometimes. Off site doesn’t give a fuck.
No.11223
Anonymous
Ms. /co/ proving once again its inherent inferiority to every other contest. At the very least I can say this year had some great moments and OC compared to last time, but the order of this elite eight is completely fucked.
No.11224
Anonymous
Replies:>>11225
need new thread plz
No.11225
NightShift
Replies:>>11226
>>11224
Internet is dogshit in this hotel.
>>11214
I'm not even awake until around 3pm. I missed your question, but it wasn't malicious. I'll try to remember it for Mr co.


Did that person have a new poll site recommendation? I'm still interested.
No.11226
Anonymous
Replies:>>11228
>>11225
>Did that person have a new poll site recommendation? I'm still interested.
I'm also interested, in order to get rid of rigging once and for all though. Also I was proposing the idea of making a limit to nominees, something like a 512 characters rule.
No.11228
NightShift
>>11226
I can understand your idea but all it takes are a couple anons who want to cause problems replying to their own post. Not only that, it doesn't account for different timezones.
No.11230
Anonymous
>>11218
But still pretty bad considering half of the Elite 8 was voted on to appease their furry fetishes.
I'm also convinced that the furry rigger is from /trash/.
No.11231
Anonymous
>>11212
The fact that she's probably going to win fucking boggles the mind
No.11232
Anonymous
what kind of drugs do I need to take to be like the ena trans/spinel asterisk poster?
No.11233
Anonymous
Another semen slurping year. 2021 was marginally better because there was at least no confirmed rigging of the E8's.
No.11237
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>11247
I’m disappointed in everything
No.11238
Anonymous
Here's hoping 2023 is better
No.11239
Anonymous
Replies:>>11240
ENA...
No.11240
Anonymous
No.11241
Anonymous
Replies:>>11242
should I make a new thread?
No.11242
Anonymous
>>11241
nightshift said to do so if fern isn't around so I'll go ahead and do so
No.11247
Anonymous
>>11237
What happened this time?
No.11248
Anonymous
HeELLO THREAD PLS?
No.11249
Anonymous
WHERE'S THE THREAD
No.11250
Anonymous
Image:166292300699.png(381kB, 996x575)raspt.png
>>10800
https://voca.ro/15WQD9zWKmgU
No.11252
Anonymous
really hope nsa doesn't make us wait long to see the results
No.11253
Anonymous
Oh shit it's almost time!
No.11254
Anonymous
Replies:>>11255
Why is the poll still open?
No.11255
Anonymous
Replies:>>11256
>>11254
>Inb4 NSA executed a Temp and now is giving extra time for whatever mess happened to fix itself.
No.11256
Anonymous
>>11255
the poll's closed now but idk if nsa is just waiting for a new thread or they're trying to do a reveal, i'm not touching the thread on /co/ right now
No.11257
Anonymous
FANG WON
No.11258
Anonymous
Image:166293956627.png(337kB, 2850x986)Shirley Tweet.png
No.11259
Anonymous
Did NSA make a typo or did they just confirm Shirley was rigging by naming Chel second place?
No.11260
Anonymous
>>11259
oh my god he did
No.11261
Anonymous
what a fucking retard
No.11262
Anonymous
Replies:>>11280
>>11200
Sure thing anon.
No.11263
Anonymous
Replies:>>11268
>>11259
Shirley has been rigging since round 3. Nicole too. NSA should've just tossed out rigged votes and let the actual winners move forward and put out a message clarifying the actual winners would have lost if the rigged votes were counted. That's what they do for fucking Ms. /mlp/. Why not do the same here?
No.11264
Anonymous
Replies:>>11267
>naming a character who wasn't in the finals the second place winner
what the absolute fuck is the rationale for this
No.11265
Anonymous
NSA did his best to save it. Fuck furriggers, this is the best outcome possible with what was had.
No.11266
Anonymous
>>11265
Based Scalies
No.11267
Anonymous
>>11264
he's malding about furries
No.11268
Anonymous
>>11263
>That's what they do for fucking Ms. /mlp/. Why not do the same here?
Because these contests are held together by paperclips, bubblegum and concentrated autism. There was no protocol to dealing with cheaters. In 2020 when someone found out the contest was being linked on a facebook group for Emmy votes, Stats literally admitted to not knowing what to do and then said he'd leave Emmy in for the voters to deal with, and we did. NSA brought up the rigging in the third round, and the majority response was to do the same and the characters would be voted out, and they weren't. The voters had the knowledge of riggers and weren't able to do anything about them. I'm glad NSA stepped in before a minor character from five episodes total won the whole thing.
No.11269
Anonymous
So I guess this is a new milestone
I think this is the first time that a character who was in elite eight in a previous year has won a tournament
No.11270
Anonymous
No.11271
Anonymous
Replies:>>11272
>>11269
Yup. Elite 8 curse is no longer a thing.
No.11272
Anonymous
>>11269
>>11271
Who will break the Elite Eight curse in Mr. /co/ and the /v/ tournaments? I'm predicting Hank Hill for Mr. /co/, Tifa for Qo/v/, and Kiryu for Ko/v/.
No.11273
Anonymous
Replies:>>11275
I wonder how long it will take for people to realize that this also happened in Mr. /co/ 2018. Cap was rigged to the finals, results revealed this and Johnny was declared winner, but because Jack lost to Cap before we will never know if Johnny would have actually endured a fight againts Jack.
In other words, if you think this year deserves an * then Mr. /co/ 2018 might as well too.
No.11274
Anonymous
Replies:>>11282
>>11272
Hank is completely and absolutely fucked after the PROPANE shitshow. Idk about Tifa and Kyriu but I don’t see it either.
No.11275
Anonymous
>>11272
Probably Hank yeah.

>>11273
Yeah not saying NSA did a clean job (I'm mixed on Chel getting bumped up to second) but I don't know what I would've done in his place.
No.11276
Anonymous
Replies:>>11281
Image:166294254295.jpg(136kB, 942x942)91C6DF6B-2A22-4948-823F-BB42D509080B.jpeg
>>11269
Indeed it is a new milestone for any tourney. I know the folks in those threads are mad as usual but really I’m very glad for the fang gang, she would’ve probably won 2020 if it weren’t for ms monarch getting her show canceled. This may also guarantee chel the possible win for 2024
No.11277
Anonymous
Replies:>>11278
>>11272
I'm thinking Daffy myself
No.11278
Anonymous
>>11277
This.
No.11279
Anonymous
Image:166294273219.jpg(1.99MB, 3508x2480)94C27948-6C28-4611-8BD4-82F316F705C4.jpeg
Fanggang, we won!
No.11280
Anonymous
>>11262
>>11200
Ok here you go:
https://boards.4channel.org/co/thread/132935972#p132935985
No.11281
Anonymous
Image:166294289475.png(2.12MB, 1849x2048)164525257005.png
Congratulations to Fang! I will be making the Murder Games tomorrow or the next day after it. Got some family stuff to attend.
>>11276
This is why I rather stay in /tnt/. Place is way more chill.
No.11282
Anonymous
>>11274
Tifa has a shot after the massive shitshow that was the Qo/v/ 2020 finals. Kiryu on the other hand has a great shot of winning due to him coasting his way to semi-finals easily both years he's been in.
No.11284
Anonymous
Replies:>>11288
Image:166294388071.png(218kB, 1022x529)fang.png
Folks, it's been quite the wild ride. I'll see you all next year (or October; I SHOULD be here for Mr. /co/lympus. My move was delayed...joy.)

Nominations:
https://voca.ro/11qbH3jaVZpy

Qualifiers:
https://voca.ro/1nxGzbZyfv5q

Round 1:
https://voca.ro/1oAUMsL1qG2K

Round 2:
https://voca.ro/1cr65ONYhlh9

Round 3:
https://voca.ro/1fFlahqcyy9k

Round 4:
https://voca.ro/1cObNDesovxq

Quarterfinals:
https://voca.ro/1mPsIM4sAYyR

Semifinals:
https://voca.ro/1bo3bok49Okb

Final Fight:
https://voca.ro/1ne5ISOOtsgn

Finale (New!):
https://voca.ro/15FJ0RVjGEeo
No.11288
Anonymous
>>11284
Thanks again for everything radioanon
No.11290
Anonymous
Replies:>>11294
All in favor for banning NightShiftAnon in hosting any further Ms. /co/ and Mr. /co/ ?
He ultimately made Fang look bad and ruined multiple contestants and when he finally decided to intervene, there was no point in intervention needed as Fang would have won anyways but without the massive outrage of people finding out how NSA handled it
No.11291
Anonymous
Replies:>>11292
>round 3 ends
>nsa: hey there's cheating
>everyone: oh it's fine keep going
>skip to finale
>fang wins
>zomg rigged finale wtf
No.11292
Anonymous
>>11291
I lost respect for NSA because of that. He's just adding fuel to the fire in the current thread. Is he really that immature? What does fern think about all of this? Saying this as someone pissed he didn't give Chel a second chance.
No.11294
Anonymous
No.11295
Anonymous
>>11292
what I'm getting at is, you can't fully blame the guy if everyone told him not to do it, he did what most hosts do and keep out of it
No.11296
Anonymous
Replies:>>11339
>>11265
He absolutely should have done a finals match-up of Chel vs Fang if he knew Shirley was cheating. The downside is I don't know if the mods would let us stay an extra day.
No.11297
Anonymous
Replies:>>11300
>>11295
that being said, at least all the rigged characters got fucked over
yeah if round 3 results where altered perhaps it would've been different but as far as things go it's better than nothing
No.11298
Anonymous
Replies:>>11299
As a Fang bro not giving Chel a second chance and fucking over Shirley only now is fucking stupid. Like sure Fang winning is good for me and all but at the end of the day it's really not a clean win
No.11299
Anonymous
Replies:>>11301
>>11298
What's with his childish behavior in the thread? I'm too part of the Fang gang but no need to still carry on with the drama.
No.11300
Anonymous
>>11295
>>11297
Yeah he did what people told him to do. The one thing I'm not really feeling is him switching Chel's and Shirley's placings respectively without asking. Then again if he stopped right before the finals and said "hey Shirley is still definitely rigging, you guys sure about this?" people would've spewed their autism all over him. Tbh I'd be ok with ignoring it and keeping Shirley in 2nd and Chel in 3rd.

NSA absolutely fucking get out of the thread rn, you have to give these weirdos time to calm down or else in a few weeks you're going to lose Mr. /co/ to Temp.
No.11301
Anonymous
>>11299
he's got the 'tism
No.11302
fern avatarfag !ma9qovM58k
Image:166294841360.png(55kB, 252x252)you never truly leave the chair.PNG
>>11292
>What does fern think about all of this?
No.11303
Anonymous
>>11300
>NSA absolutely fucking get out of the thread rn, you have to give these weirdos time to calm down or else in a few weeks you're going to lose Mr. /co/ to Temp.
I approve of what NSA did, I'm glad that the riggers got rekt, but I highly advise that he step down from all future tournaments voluntarily.

Going forward, any tournament hosted by NSA will be completely infested by salty drama about him as a host.
No.11304
Anonymous
>>11303
He deserves the drama. He should have handled this shit back in round three, not let the retards vote to ignore it and then get salty himself about the final results later on.
No.11305
Anonymous
>>11302
I'm so sorry you had to go through this again man.
No.11310
Anonymous
Replies:>>11340
>>11303
This, all of the rigging should have been addressed the moment it was brought up.
I was flabbergasted when the rigged votes were called out and then just allowed through, but even more surprised at the change of heart at the end that destroyed any chance of consistency.
It was a bit of a shit show, unfortunately.
No.11311
Anonymous
>>11303
him doing nothing for the finals wouldn't have caused any of the outrage to begin with, he practically fucked himself over just to what? own the riggers by himself instead of you know, Fang who would have won eitherway without needing him to remove votes? This wasn't in any way smart
No.11312
Anonymous
Replies:>>11315
Image:166295262364.gif(1.43MB, 360x238)1650800818249.gif
>>11302
What do you think you are? Better?
Fuck no chum, you're as, if not more incompetent than NSA. What have you done in literally any tournament history? You guessed it, make the :| face as if you're the competent one here.

I'll give it to you, at least you're smart enough to make yourself appear the most retarded out of any host.
No.11315
Anonymous
Replies:>>11320
Image:166295470898.jpg(36kB, 640x480)ruthion30-817337174127505408-20170106_064902-img1.jpg
>>11312
>t. NSA on full-blown damage control
>pic related, it's (You)
No.11316
Anonymous
Replies:>>11322
>>11303
Yes, and one of the salt sowers would be me. The minimum I want for a host is consistency, not whatever the hell he tried to do at the last second there.
No.11318
Anonymous
tournament was suck but fun
No.11319
Anonymous
Replies:>>11321
This tournament was fun to laugh at, way to go NightShift.
Please never host again.
No.11320
Anonymous
>>11315
But he literally is in full-blown damage control, just look at his behavior.
What's the argument here?
That you have no argument?
Message conveyed
No.11321
Anonymous
>>11319
Seconding.
No.11322
Anonymous
>>11316
Literally the only thing I'm mad at NightShift for, right here.
No.11323
Anonymous
Replies:>>11324
guessing there's no afterparty this time, mods always seem fussy when it comes to that
No.11324
NightShift
>>11323
There were a few. We had until the 11th. I went to mods just to check if they consider after party threads a part of the main tourney. They do.
I wasn't even asking for an extension just clarification, and the moment a mod thought I was asking for another date they made it clear they were upset.

The first thing I learned on there is, if you ask mod for something then ask another for something because you didn't like their first response, they will ban you. It puts the entire tourney in danger.

I told you anons, we have a time limit. There could never be a redo round. We had a schedule, and we needed to stick to it.
No.11328
Anonymous
Replies:>>11330
>>11302
You didn't even do anything to help him. You just kept trolling in the threads. NSA was running a tourney. What were you doing?
>>11300
Temp is banned isn't he? I don't think he'll lose the mr. They know he's the one doing it. I think he should have disqualified them earlier, but then the riggers would of hopped on other girls. There was no winning.
No.11329
Anonymous
>>11269
Indeed it is, and also, with Fang winning, the record of Spinel being the youngest winner has been broken, as Primal aired in October 2019, one month after Steven Universe: The Movie premiered, making Fang the youngest winner in both Ms. /co/ and Mr. /co/lympus.
No.11330
Anonymous
>>11328
>Make thread after jannies say no.
>Only 47 anons in the thread.
>Some aren't even seething, just shitting on riggucks.
https://boards.4channel.org/co/thread/132945941
>Lost so hard they have to hope a new host takes over.

Riggers are the dumbest people on the board. Between voting for an option that points them out as riggers, to crying about chad NSA for removing them. It should go without saying that hosts can disqualify riggers that get a win only by cheating. I was amazed this wasn't already in the rules. It has been 4 years without rigging clauses.

Oh and some anon is so mad he's making a rigging discord.
No.11331
Anonymous
>>11330
Yeah, it’s funny seeing them meltdown towards the end here but all in all seriousness I had fun in his tournament and it was most certainly not the worst one. I think mr /co/ is gonna be significantly better as always so I’ll be keeping an eye out on that date (oct 7th). See you all later
No.11333
Anonymous
>>11324
thanks for the response and yeah they do seem to assume things rather quickly
actually the 2nd afterparty thread archived at 6am gmt which would make sense cus that's just after midnight est and like you said we had until the 11th and that'd make it the 12th
No.11336
Anonymous
Replies:>>11337
The current after party thead up on /co/ is the last one? I thought they had 24 hours after the final poll closed. They should still have a while to go in that case.
No.11337
Anonymous
>>11336
usually it's the case but I wouldn't hate it if it the last thread

also catching up with the other thread, love how we're considered "off-boarders" rigging the tourney
No.11338
Anonymous
>They think it's over
It's rigging time.
No.11339
Anonymous
>>11296
They won't. NSA said so. But he did offer for them to battle it out on Mr. /co/.
No.11340
Anonymous
>>11310
I don't think it was a change of heart. NSA had been following the rules closely. He wanted to remove rigged votes from the start but didn't have clearance. Then he got it in the finals.
No.11341
Anonymous
Replies:>>11344
>>11340
Yeah but that means wiki writers don't count the tourney as legitimate. We should listen to them too. Why did Nightshift ignore them?
>>11324
Why didn't you listen to wiki writers?
No.11342
Anonymous
Replies:>>11414
>>11324
Hi there. I don't know if you can answer it when you have time but, is the "Say nothing but remove votes" gonna be applied to King and Queen too? Also just hope you don't hold a grudge against any character or fans just because of the riggers though.
No.11343
Anonymous
>>11330
The rigging discord is run by Brisby fags. He was right to out them.
No.11344
Anonymous
Replies:>>11346
>>11341
I think it was really petulant. Allowing a rigged character 2nd place is an awful idea. You might as well say 2022 didn't happen since you don't believe in the host's decisions. He already made a decision round three listening to spamming anons. Why accept that as legitimate unless you have a motive?
>>11340
This.
No.11345
Anonymous
>Fang fucking won
Cartman kills himselfyoutube thumb
No.11346
Anonymous
>>11344
I don't know what they were thinking ignoring the majority of people to dab on Nightshift. It's no different than him dabbing on riggers. Only the difference is. They dabbed on him for riggers.
No.11348
Anonymous
Image:166299999234.png(928kB, 1361x709)e8.png
No.11349
Anonymous
>didn't have clearence
he can do whatever he wants,
why do you think you need public opinion on dealing with cheaters? Especially when they tell you to ignore LMFAO
should have kept quiet or done it the moment it was known and not in the end
No.11350
Anonymous
The guy defending NSA here is the ass Chelanon btw
No.11351
Anonymous
Replies:>>11355
>>11324
>I told you anons, we have a time limit. There could never be a redo round. We had a schedule, and we needed to stick to it.
This is what I've said multiple times but people don't listen. We can't do a lightning rematch in the last day when most people aren't going to be following the thread anymore. I wouldn't even suggest doing a fake Fang vs Chel poll in Mr. /co/ because that's going to reopen old wounds. Can't we just let Chel compete in 2023?
No.11352
Anonymous
Replies:>>11353
Ok, I'm dumb, who officially won Ms. /co/?
No.11353
Anonymous
>>11352
Fang.
No.11355
Anonymous
>>11351
No. She already beat a nonrigged character in the Elite 8 during quarterfinals.
No.11356
Anonymous
>"the backash from spitevoting the previous year means this year will be a cleaner battle between all stars and genuine love for characters"
lol
No.11358
Anonymous
>>11356
Autism and horny is a dangerous combination.
No.11359
Anonymous
So, what is the closest incoming tourney?
mr. /co/, ms. /aco/ or ms. /mlp/?
No.11360
Anonymous
>>11359
I think Mr. /co/ and Ms. colorful equine happen around the same time?
No.11361
Anonymous
>>11356
I told you it would be a bloodbath, I told you all
No.11362
Anonymous
>>11359
Ms /aco/ ended earlier and queen tyranne was the winner of that. Mr /co/lympus is next and I have zero interest in any rainbow ungulate contest
No.11363
Anonymous
>>11359
>>11362
What's up with Ms. /aco/? Is it basically just Ms. /co/ except you can post porn?
No.11364
Anonymous
Replies:>>11365
Image:166300974689.jpg(24kB, 640x364)cherri.jpeg
>>11363
Yes, Tourneymaster is supposed to return in October and host Ms. /aco/. When and how will announce it that's another story, I gave him the link to this place but I'm not sure if he will return.
No.11365
Anonymous
Replies:>>11385
>>11364
Gotcha, I might participate in that whenever it happens. Hopefully Tourneymaster doesn't disappear like what happens to other hosts. I still miss Macho Manon
No.11369
Anonymous
Replies:>>11382
All those in favor for a Fang vs. Chel Grudge Match as an extra final in next year's finals?
No.11371
Anonymous
It ended
No.11372
Anonymous
>>11363
Basically, yes, is like Ms. /co/, but it also involve characters from games, such Midna or Shantae.
I believe any female character that appears in western porn can be nominated.
No.11375
Anonymous
welp time to wait for mr./co/
No.11381
Anonymous
Replies:>>11385
Image:166302741662.png(695kB, 1199x800)The Queen.png
No.11382
Anonymous
Replies:>>11739
>>11369
Just wait until 2024, when Chel "The Uncrowned Queen" can campaign on a platform of "It Was Her Turn" and "She Was Robbed" to comfortably coast her way to an easy legitimate victory.

As we've seen for Fang, if you bend the rules, then everybody will argue ceaselessly about whether or not the victory was legitimate. Rematching them in 2023 would just lead to pointless drama that steals attention away from the rest of the 2023 contestants.
No.11385
Anonymous
Replies:>>11387
Image:166303222803.jpg(15kB, 374x322)a7b917bc8a7c4e93e336c43e0141f207263c9669_hq.jpg
>>11365
Who is Macho Manon?
>>11381
One day I hope either Izzy or Cherri can get in there. Anyway, I have started working in the Murder Games, it's going to be tomorrow Sep, 13 at 8PM Est or maybe later the same day. I'll try to create a thread much later today so anons can discuss if they want.
No.11386
Anonymous
Replies:>>11388
Anyone got the winner sheet thing? I want to make the real one.
No.11387
Anonymous
Image:166303360435.jpg(731kB, 1064x710)macho.jpg
>>11385
Macho Manon a.k.a. Bracket Anon was the original host of Queen and King of /v/. He put together the tournaments that year and they went off without a hitch. He was the best host, super chill, never took sides, never made drama, and would just hang out in the threads with the voters. Last he's been heard of was before Queen of /v/ 2020, where he said he had some personal business to take care off but never came back, but who knows, seeing as the original Ms. /co/ host made an appearance this year, maybe Macho Manon will come back too. Probably not but a man can dream.
No.11388
Anonymous
Replies:>>11389
>>11386
The only thing wrong with Fang's is she's facing the wrong way.
No.11389
Anonymous
Replies:>>11391
>>11388
No, Chel got second place.
No.11390
Anonymous
Replies:>>11392
Image:166303440212.jpg(24kB, 521x389)073c48fece1b2584be6252d9e45f2267831c222fr1-521-389v2_uhq.jpg
>>11362
>>11363
That means Amelia has a second chance if Livesey wins Mr. /co/. I was laughing seeing both Betty and Tyr'ahnne last year as part of Grievous' harem.
No.11391
Anonymous
>>11389
If you want to make a version where Chel is 2nd to make yourself feel better go ahead, but the picture is already on the wiki and Shirley's listed as 2nd place everywhere else.
No.11392
Anonymous
Replies:>>11429
>>11390
Three, if Temp makes Tag Team. Come to think of it, Livesey and Amelia can be teamed up together.
No.11393
Anonymous
>>11391
Eh, I don't agree that a rigging character should be allowed to get second place. I'm going to make the real one. Wiki guys listening to riggers is really stupid.
No.11394
Anonymous
Replies:>>11401
>>11387
hol up, 2018 dude was here?
No.11396
Anonymous
>>11393
It's petty drama. Create the sheet you think won.
No.11397
Anonymous
>>11393
Like I said, go ahead.
No.11398
Anonymous
>>11393
I've been working on second place art for Chel. Since in my opinion she deserves it.
No.11399
Anonymous
Replies:>>11405
>>11393
>Eh, I don't agree that a rigging character should be allowed to get second place.
take it up with Nightshift then. he was the one who let Shirley into the finals, after all.
No.11400
Anonymous
Replies:>>11409
>>11393
As someone who supported Shirley, Chel can take the second place. Go ahead. Hopefully the new rules will prevent this from ever happening.
No.11401
Anonymous
Replies:>>11404
>>11394
Seems like it yea. Tripcode is the same. He only showed up for one post in qualifiers though. Still if it is actually him, cool to see he's still out there.
https://desuarchive.org/_/search/boards/co.desu.meta/tripcode/%21vLTteyo%2FXk/page/1/
No.11402
Anonymous
>>11393
Wiki guys saying something and the hosts saying something different just means you should probably look at it objectively.
>Do other tourneys disqualify people who cheat?
>Do you think Chel deserves it?
That's all there is to it.
>>11391
>Shirley is listed winner everywhere else.
The wiki? On the actual tourney bracket it says Chel won. And the host says Chel won. Psyanon said Chel won. I'm not gonna listen to wikifags just because they're mad rigging characters got punished the way they should have from the start.
No.11403
Anonymous
Replies:>>11406
>>11402
Tbh I don't mind or care, I just don't want there to be edit fights on the wiki if that's understandable. When I do Chel's page I'll even make a note that her placement is contested.
No.11404
Anonymous
Replies:>>11411
>>11402
I agree that Chel won too, she deserves it more and more applying to the new rules, Shirley supporter here.
>>11401
Why did he keep changing his name?
No.11405
Anonymous
>>11399
And he was the one who kicked her out. If we listened to him there then should we listen to him here? It's a contradiction.
No.11406
Anonymous
Replies:>>11408
>>11403
The wiki should reflect the actual tourney. The poll doesn't decide the winner. The sheets do. I'd say they should write about how Chel is second place, Shirley was demoted to third. This is the first incidence where rigging to win results in a disqualification. Which is what's going to happen in future tournaments too.

I just think it makes wiki anons look bad. Because it seems like they agree with cheating. The host's job is to reduce cheating, and run the tourney. And removing a cheating character is the bare minimum power he should have like most people agreed.
No.11407
Anonymous
Replies:>>11411
Image:166303728438.png(348kB, 540x662)Cherri.png
>>11387
I'm a little confused. So there's a "Bracket Anon" and also a "Brackets Anon"?
No.11408
Anonymous
>>11406
I meant to say, "seems like they agree with cheating" Saying the wiki could result in an editing war when only people trolling think Shirley should have 2nd place is just appealing to bad behavior.
No.11409
Anonymous
Replies:>>11410
>>11400
I wonder if Night took all the OC and campaigns into account when he thought about the reveal? If characters have been cheating but have great OC should they be removed?
No.11410
Anonymous
Replies:>>11414
>>11409
Yes. Just because there's a great campaign, doesn't mean that gives a pass for rigging. If Night used this as a basis for his choice it's understandable, but not acceptable.
No.11411
Anonymous
>>11404
>Why did he keep changing his name?
The Spinel shitshow. He wasn't expecting it or was prepared for it, so he stepped down during semis. I don't know why he came back this year and only for one post, but it's still interesting.
>>11407
Yea two different people. Most people call him Macho Manon or the Macho Man host due to him always posting Randy Savage. As far as I know, he hasn't shown up since before Qo/v/ 2020, either with his trip or without. The OG Ms. /co/ host returning does give me a little hope that he and/or Stats might come back, but we'll just have to see.
No.11412
Anonymous
Hey NSA instead of doing Chel vs Fang in Mr. /co/ (which would really serve no point) who not do Chel vs Shirley again?
No.11413
Anonymous
Replies:>>11414
>>11412
wait nvm that's a stupid idea. I'm fine with changing Chel to 2nd place on the wiki, like I said I just don't want there to be back and forth passive aggressive edits.
No.11414
NightShift
I’m not trying to start issues with wiki guys. I know you have to protect your site. I’m sorry if I came off gruff or rude. I deserve the criticisms.

I’m willing to do a Chel vs Fang but most anons didn’t want it, and reading the posts here and seeing the results, people really don’t want cheating to proliferate. I was dumb for listening to (you)s instead of disqualifying cheaters from the start. I really did think letting you all know would stomp em out. I tried to be hands off the entire time, and I avoided talking in the threads unless it was nessassary.

I’m willing to drop out if my approval ratings are low at the end of this year.

>>11412
>>11413
I’m scared riggers would cheat for Chel, and it would drag her name in a Fang v Chel rematch.
Chel vs Shirley would just result in cheating for Shirley.
>>11410
I didn’t. It was something I considered though. What made me speak was there being a pattern, and too many girls being used for rigging. Which I’m sure was to get rid of the top seeds.
>>11342
I’m going to have that rule there. I would vote on it, but it really is just common sense to stop rigging when you see it.
I’m not the main host. LazyDay is. I’m not well versed in /v/ like him. He’s going to be helping me in Mr. /co/ this year so he can start small. Learn the ropes, and I’ll be monitoring/assisting him in Queen /v/. Then once he’s past his apprentice period he can run the tourneys on /v/ without me handholding.
No.11415
NightShift
>>11414
Oh and I’m still looking for that alt to google forms.
No.11416
Anonymous
Replies:>>11418
>>11414
I can see. Please be specific towards him about the rule so he acts silently when removing suspicious votes, we don't want more characters tainted by riggers, if everything goes well he may as well host tag team this year. So, you're not mad towards the characters?
No.11417
Anonymous
>>11414
>I really did think letting you all know would stomp em out.
To be fair I thought we would too since we voted Emmy out in 2020. I'll rip the band-aid off and switch Shirley and Chel on the wiki, but we're going to need a new Elite 8 image if the anon who made it is around and is willing to edit it.
No.11418
NightShift
>>11416
No. I was mad that riggers aped good characters, and used their good will from campaigns to force top characters out. No character deserved what they got because of cheaters. Of course. Every past host should try to teach new hosts. Vet them and spread the wealth. He’s been watching the tourney and I hope he recognizes how important clarity, and PR is.
Now that I have at least one other host on rotation it’s less stress. If anons want to learn how to do these I’m willing to take new blood.

I just want to stay hosting Mr. /co/, and I guess Ms. /co/ is mine now until I vet another anon. At first it felt like a burden, but seeing anons have fun is a great feeling.
No.11419
Anonymous
Replies:>>11422
>>11414
>>11418
Are you gonna let Fern host? You said you have one in rotation. Why not Fern too? Didn’t he help out? I swear you mentioned teaching him.
Also are you gonna post all the art from the tourney? I don’t think you should repost asterisk shit.
>>11417
I’ll find the png. I’m Chel artist anon.
No.11420
Anonymous
Replies:>>11421
>>11418
> I was mad that riggers aped good characters, and used their good will from campaigns to force top characters out.

If you're mad you should probably not passive aggressively mass reply to people and let them fight it out instead with a poll. Rigged or not this stuff already gets hectic enough without the only guy actually running this thing fumbling and showing weakness with hindsight.
No.11421
NightShift
>>11420
What do you mean, by fight it out? You mean just let them argue? I just go by the poll/sheet.
I think what I’ve taken from this is just host, don’t talk unless it’s simple (harmless) questions, and make it more clear in nominations you could argue for a character.
No.11422
NightShift
>>11419
Didn’t notice this, and yes I was hoping to let a fern become a full host. I was vetting him. That didn’t pan out. I just have the one audition now.
I’m gonna go through the OC em later.
No.11424
Anonymous
The entire thing was an obvious Fang rig and you fucked up massively by making claims you knew nothing about.

FangGangers rigged out all of her competition, and you let them. You even gave them the win in the final by choosing not to run Chel.
No.11425
Anonymous
Replies:>>11427
>>11424
I only recall Fang seeking votes from other threads, however I still find fishy the fact she managed to beat Raven.
No.11426
Anonymous
Image:166305976928.png(208kB, 768x768)mima copium.png
>>11424
No.11427
Anonymous
>>11425
Fang stomped over Starfire during the 2020 quarter-finals and she got in the top 8 before Raven ever could, it isn't fishy at all.
No.11428
Anonymous
Replies:>>11436
>>11417
I finally finished.
https://files.catbox.moe/sf0za4.png
https://files.catbox.moe/7c1ryk.png

Two versions. Pick whichever looks better.
I gotta finish my Chel art now.
No.11429
Anonymous
Image:166306292879.jpg(86kB, 651x486)4e95dafe2fd1bbc82c957c44be5ac41c.jpg
>>11392
>Not pairing Amelia with her Soviet counter-part.
No.11430
Anonymous
Image:166306300869.png(1.85MB, 811x1411)57e.png
>>11429
Dr. Livesey also could very well work considering he's literally the chadder version of Dr. Doppler.
No.11432
Anonymous
>>11414
Thanks for being comprehensive, NightShift. I don't agree with all of the decisions you have taken through the course of this tournament, but if you are willing to step out for the sake of our enjoyment then I can only respect you.
Really, the best you can do is avoid drama at all costs, and making sure to keep out riggers without tainting characters is the best course of action.
No.11436
Anonymous
Image:166307209007.jpg(25kB, 300x244)19BA59B9-9F15-498B-93ED-4AEACD8427E5.jpeg
>>11428
>Made two.
>Both have lots of quality to em. Cave one is my favorite.
>the losers have color to them and aren’t Betty Boop knockoffs.
>Primal writing
>Spear is in both cheering her on.

I hope they use the cave one for the wiki.
No.11437
Anonymous
>>11429
I was referencing more that unused concept art of Livesey and Amelia but he works too.
No.11460
Anonymous
Image:166309231376.gif(1.49MB, 480x319)19E6AB95-2E89-4DA1-8049-6EFE1ADFE426.gif
Riggers cope and seethe
No.11461
Anonymous
Image:166309287354.jpg(1.66MB, 3502x4798)7F4E5C16-828D-47E0-9083-2D7B91948658.jpeg
>>11460
That’s the spirit.
I’m working on a new trophy to go alongside The Jenny.
I call it The Starry.
Now second place will have something too.
No.11471
Anonymous
>>11461
I love it
No.11473
Anonymous
Replies:>>11600
>>11460
The riggers successfully fucked the entire tournament.
If anyone's seething here it's you lol
No.11474
Anonymous
Image:166309911976.png(326kB, 1000x561)spinel9.png
I don't really feel strongly either way about Fang's run but I think it'd be funny to have OC of Spinel riding Fang as a mount into battle, leading an army of Peruvians and muscular giggarigga chads.
No.11476
Anonymous
>>11418
They all deserved what they got.
This is 4chan, not your hug box.
No.11597
Anonymous
>>11417
Hey, are you going to make the change?
No.11600
Anonymous
>>11473
And it's crazy to think they "deserved what they got", when chances are some legit votes were removed while other riggers got away scot free.
No.11605
Anonymous
Image:166317474072.jpg(1.11MB, 3502x4798)524F4009-1CBE-40B3-BF6C-14A773B63D88.jpeg
>>11461
Finished
No.11606
Anonymous
Image:166317571008.jpg(57kB, 1024x576)1602683299445.jpg
>>11605
that's pretty good
No.11611
Anonymous
Replies:>>11616
>>11605
That's great lol.
I think it's cool to give Starfire some recognition again too. She has a stronger history than any of the "FARTS" but gets pretty much no mention ever.
No.11614
Anonymous
Image:166318326023.jpg(1.60MB, 1170x1981)151CBFE5-A23B-4C95-9744-3CBFE59C6991.jpeg
Here’s my recap, I definitely went too far in a few places. If I do it again it’ll HAVE to be shorter for my sake.

Enjoy anons: https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/132986541/#132986541
No.11616
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>11611
She’s part of SCK Coalition isn’t she?
No.11617
Anonymous
Image:166318799761.png(2.25MB, 3168x5788)2022 recap.png
>>11614
No.11618
Anonymous
>>11617
good lord
No.11619
Anonymous
Replies:>>11623
Image:166318834466.png(2.92MB, 3168x5788)2022 recap with arrow.png
>>11614
>>11617
and here's a version with a helpful arrow because in my effort to minimize empty space i fucked up the rows
No.11622
Anonymous
>>11614
Holy fucking based
Make sure to repost this during Mr /co/, you deserve the (you)s
No.11623
Anonymous
Image:166319370109.png(81kB, 480x480)1576398513897.png
>>11614
>>11617
>>11619
thank you for your service brave and noble dongposter
man it's crazy to look back at what can happen in a week, I was going through each thread like you were and even I missed out on some of this stuff
one of the highlights for me was that one jucikafag crying about anime and all the responses where anime with "..."
I hope shit gets less busy for you so you can both enjoy the threads and give us epic recaps
No.11626
Anonymous
>>11614
Based
No.11688
Anonymous
Image:166341597147.png(291kB, 428x428)19648662528387.png
The tournament ended almost a week ago but I was wondering, what exactly did Jucika have that made so many people turn againts her? As someone who enjoyed the Rolon posting and found Skippy anon's doodles very amusing, I will never understand why Jucika received so much spite meanwhile other characters who are just as guilty if not ten times more of having a "cumbrained" fanbase without any other redeeming factors didn’t become the spotlight for spite until much later. Hell, Jucika at very least had around two or three skilled drawfags campaigning for her, you almost never see that with the other heavy hitters.
No.11691
Anonymous
>>11688
one of the bakifags campaigning for her here, I have no clue honestly
like maybe because she's just a comic character and that most of her panels are sexual jokes in nature, but every character was being sexualized
maybe people hate non-pure girls but she has a heart of gold? who knows honestly
No.11728
Anonymous
>>11688
I think she's like a "new show" character. Although her strip is old her fame is recent, so she's sort of on level with a recent series character in the tournaments. There's also the amount of attention her fans have brought to her when Jucika's sort of a divisive character. It's easy to see what's basically a comic strip gimmick character as being very overrated. And of course she's made prior E8. Overall it paints a target.
tbh I've never been a fan of her so eh.
No.11729
Anonymous
Replies:>>11731
>>11688
Probably jealousy as she was part of a class of old school sex appeal that many modern characters don’t have, classy but also not outright lewd, something some people don’t understand completely because standards have changed over the past 60 years, and yet this didn’t stop Betty but that was because she’s a classic legacy character and not an obscure Hungarian comic strip character that resurged after being left behind nearly 50 years since her series ended. Regardless this won’t be the last we’ll be seeing her in these tournaments as she won’t have to wait out a year this time. As always I’ll be backing her when given the chance.
No.11731
Anonymous
Replies:>>11734
>>11688
>>11729
Jucika only lost by three votes which was definitely more because of strategic and meme voting than an actual grudge against her character, I'd say. I don't even remember her getting a lot of shit in the threads before she lost to Propane.
No.11732
Anonymous
>>11688
she's just not a good character. and unlike most sexy characters, a lot of her fans aren't aware enough to realize or admit that she's only good for a rub.
No.11733
Anonymous
Replies:>>11735
>>11732
Bro I would struggle to call more than half of the Ms. /co/ heavy hitters good characters.
No.11734
Anonymous
>>11731
I sincerely hope Propane doesn’t make the cut again. I supported it at first because when /v/ did the same with E&I it resulted into funny banter and some great OC, but this was just nonstop vitriol. Ironically enough Propaniacs tried to be subtle about their seethe after their pick lost because getting mad went against their entire facade, but in the end they became the exact kind of faggots they always insisted they were better than.
No.11735
Anonymous
Replies:>>11737
>>11734
Since Hank will be able to compete again next year I'm afraid Propane will make it back in but yeah, it was funny at first and then it almost made it into the elite 8. It was learning experience, I guess.

>>11732
>>11733
Honestly what makes a good character is really subjective. I personally wouldn't consider Jucika a good character, but not due to a lack of failure on the author's part. It's a newspaper comic with no dialogue and no ongoing character arcs. For what she is, which is a sexy and sweet young woman, Jucika is fine, and I can see myself voting for with the right setup. But other than that it's a Swan Princess "what else is there?" question for me. I'm not saying she HAS to be super deep, like she does what the author set out to do with her very well, but she's just not really exciting either. I think she'll always have strong legs in Ms. /co/, she just got handed a shit hand this year. I'm not sure she could ever win though, unless she got really lucky and ended up going against like an Owl House character in the finals.
No.11737
Anonymous
Replies:>>11738
>>11734
I think I get propaniacs. I would unironically rather have a clean propane win than a blatant rigged character win. The way I understood propane sort of became a spite against bullshit option, and then a "nuclear option" in protest. It getting removed while rigged characters continued into the E8 kind of stomped out cordiality.
>>11735
That would assume by an even greater stroke of luck an Owl character makes it to the finals.
No.11738
Anonymous
>>11737
Not really, propane had a whole narrative built around throwing the tournament into chaos waaay before we had any confirmation of rigging. They eventually took all their seethe to ENA, one of the legitimate characters in the Elite Eight that just so happened to have defeated them, who mind you was up againts a rigged character during the quaterfinals.
No.11739
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>11746
>>11382
That didn’t work for Raven and Frankie though…..

Also, is NSA confirmed for Mr. /co/? Because I’m pretty sure I’ll be busy when that happens.
No.11740
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
Replies:>>11786
Also, wait, are we suddenly pro-throwouttheriggervotes? That’s what I was argueing for from the start. Frankie was robbed…again. April was robbed. Mothra was robbed :(
No.11741
Anonymous
>>11418
Late I know, but thanks for clarifying that, and for the new rule, hopefully this will be the last time something like this happens if it's applied properly. I wanted to also mention to you to be careful about LazyDay. Tourney/Num hasn't been active in a while and chances are it could be him with another name.
No.11746
Anonymous
>>11739
Pretty sure he told the moderators the date which is October 7th so yeah he is running that as well
No.11786
Anonymous
>>11740
Get over it and follow the new rules. Are you making Tag Team?
No.11807
Anonymous
>>11786
After last year Tag Team should never come back
No.11809
TempAnon !vHqM1sfAlM
>>11786
I make my own rules, my friend. Nightshift is a troublesome one.

Yes I’m doing Tag Team.
No.11814
Anonymous
>>11809
>Not going to remove the suspicious votes
It's expected you will screw it up then the moment you happen to mention the characters who are "rigged". Take this as an advice if you want to avoid drama, but as I can see you will stick to your own rules rather than picking the safest choice. You will see it in Mr. /co/ when the new rule is applied and hopefully you will reconsider. Also you aren't in the position to judge others after the mess you pulled in 2021 and this tournament. Also, be careful if any new anon wants to help you host, if you accept it, watch over them and make sure it's not Tourney/Num. Thanks for the confirmation.
No.11816
Anonymous
Image:166361857011.jpg(140kB, 609x498)16343457968.jpg
No.11817
Anonymous
>>11816
More like Ms. /co/ 2022 if Slappy successfully vored Jucika.
No.11818
Anonymous
>>11816
More like Ms. /co/ 2022 if Tigress and Azula's wedding actually happened.
No.11820
Anonymous
>>11816
More like Ms. /co/ 2022 if it didn't happen at all
No.11821
Anonymous
>>11816
More like Ms. /co/ if Propane lost round 1.
No.11822
Anonymous
>>11816
They're too powerful for Mrs /co/
No.11825
Anonymous
Replies:>>11942
>>11809
At least NightShift apologized about his behavior and poor decision of not disqualifying the rigged characters back in Round 3. I'm still neutral about him but following the rule of removing votes silently is the best for everyone, characters and anons included. Including you Temp, especially since you were once naive enough to tell in the thread the current votes of a team back in Tag Team. You did well in /co/-/v/ but forgetting about it afterwards is one strike.
No.11826
Anonymous
>>11816
More like Ms. /co/ 2022 if the elite eight were all goth chicks
No.11827
Anonymous
Replies:>>11832
So the "upper-mid" winner prediction was all wrong. The E8 were two tops (Chel, Fang) and the rest mid-lows. I'm done predicting anything about ms. /co/. Between spiting, rigging, changing taste, and circumstantial factors it's foolish.
No.11829
Anonymous
>>11816
more like ms./co/ is bejita won instead of goku
No.11832
Anonymous
>>11827
I mean everyone besides Fang got rigged out
No.11833
Anonymous
>>11816
More like Ms. /co/ if Captain Amelia was in the E8 instead of Chel.
No.11842
Anonymous
Image:166370651769.png(187kB, 1145x567)7D5D3797-F526-406D-8053-EA33E49F6502.png
>people are still trying to give Fang (non cheater) an asterisk (symbol of cheating)
Lol, lmao even
No.11858
Anonymous
>>11842
*
Tripcode up.
No.11859
Dominos
Replies:>>11861
>>11858
Ok, you got me.
No.11861
Fuse
>>11858
>>11859
um I think you mean me
No.11868
Anonymous
Image:166383028780.jpg(5kB, 121x129)7jVIxNpa-RVnXobf.jpg
>>11809
Care to give an specific date for it? Remember that was one of your fatal errors last year since almost no one knew when was Tag Team going to be hosted and pushed you-know-who to spam threads for attention.
No.11942
Anonymous
>>11825
So who are all the hosts, how many strikes do they have and why?
No.11943
Anonymous
>>11942
Here's a couple that I know of
>Dominos Anon
Would be confrontational and kind of a dick in the threads, also lied about Nyarlathotep being rigged during King of /v/ 2021
>Original Mr. /co/ host
Rigged Captain America to the finals, stepped down after he revealed that. Has said since then that his rigging was because supposedly Johnny Bravo was rigged, which nobody believes except for Temp
>TempAnon
Incompetent idiot who mismanaged Tag Team 2021, also tried to split the Ms. /co/ 2022 vote after round 3 which got him banned from /co/. He has a big ego now for some reason too
>TourneyAnon
Read this: >>11727
Recently he also tried invading Queen and King of /v/ for this year but he got found out and subsequently banned from being involved in it.
>NightShiftAnon
Fucked up during Ms. /co/ this year by announcing some characters were being rigged but let them through, then listed Chel as 2nd place even though she wasn't in the finals
>Fern Avatarfag
Would just drama post during Tag Team 2021 and Ms. /co/ 2022 and indirectly made the situation worse in the latter

Those are the ones I'm most familiar with. I didn't mention Stats, Sheets, TagTeam, and Macho Manon since they were overall fine.
No.11946
Anonymous
>>11943
I believe what nightshiftanon did was an afterthought so that in the future situations like that wouldn’t happen again, you got to give him some credit for finally ridding of the rigging problem in these tournaments for good. This also means that mr /co/ is gonna be considerably more stable
No.11947
Anonymous
>>11946
What are the chances Stats NEVER deleted or even checked the votes for rigging? When the Perú reveal came out he was completely clueless.
No.11949
Anonymous
>>11946
I like and respect NightShift the most out of the other hosts who had strikes against them, just what happened this year was major enough to warrant a mention. I'm fine with him hosting Mr. /co/ and the /v/ tournaments as long as he doesn't have a total fuckwad co-hosting.
>>11947
Most likely considering he was barely paying attention when it happened. Maybe he did after the reveal but who knows.
No.11950
Anonymous
Replies:>>11954
Image:166420685758.png(383kB, 812x509)1651500255318.png
>>11947
>>11949
Stats honestly took the best approach towards rigging and that's not even giving a shit about it in the first place. As soon as you start manipulating votes, you're not better than the rigger's themselves. Stats was hosting proper tournaments, and fuck he was good at it.
No.11951
Anonymous
>>11943
How was Dominos a dick? I never noticed speaking in the threads until the Nyarly stuff.
No.11954
Anonymous
Replies:>>11957
>>11950
That's bullshit though. Stats was great at hosting efficiency but I don't suck his dick and I don't think I ever agreed with a ruling of his. The tournament is the point of the event. For all the bullshit it's still a competition of sorts with campaigning, speculation, seethe/celebration ect. It becomes far less fun if it's basically a fake tournament.
No.11956
Anonymous
Replies:>>12101
>>11946
>you got to give him some credit for finally ridding of the rigging problem in these tournaments for good
As if.
No.11957
Anonymous
Replies:>>11958
>>11954
Honestly, the only way one can confidentially find a rigger is if he writes down the emails that he suspects that are rigger votes, then wait for the next round if he sees said emails in similar/identical pattern like the last round. That's from my understanding the only 100% riggerproof method that can work.
No.11958
Anonymous
Replies:>>11960
>>11957
Isn't it pretty easy to find a botted 50 vote anomaly? I'm not saying it can stop every instance, but it can stop the huge tournament-altering ones.
No.11960
Anonymous
Replies:>>11963
>>11958
No, that's simply Nightshifts way of lazily removing an obvious rigger and leaving some other big fish out there.

Like, here's me for example. I am a massive faggot with a total of 24 alts (even more previously) but I don't make myself so obvious to see. For example, If I wanted to vote my main and not make some difference with others I'd vote option a with one account and vote option b with the second account. Sometimes even voting against my main every three or four alts.

I did this because when I first came in these tournaments with Ms. /co/ 2019, when stats was hosting I had over 50+ accounts but at some point around round 4, I wasn't allowed to use more than three accounts and half of my accounts were banned from google. And yes, I was voting for Spinel just for the spite.
No.11962
Anonymous
>>11946
>>11949
trip on nightshift
No.11963
Anonymous
Replies:>>11966
>>11960
Well it kind of relies on there not being such massive faggots like you. If you're actually going through that much effort for the rig then your own proposal isn't going to stop you.
Really, it comes down to an ethical thing. If the host see's a blatant rig, and especially if that rig changes the winner, then it's simply right that he remove the votes if the tournament aspect of the tournament matters at all. I support the new measures, however effective against the more extreme autism.
No.11966
Anonymous
>>11963
What I feel bad about this is that if I hadn’t voted Shirley she wouldn’t have even made it to elite eight. She would’ve lost two times if it wasn’t for me.
No.11967
Anonymous
Replies:>>11975
Image:166422501147.jpg(201kB, 823x1079)01D3C6E1-A25B-4A2A-8D0E-756FFC850911.jpeg
>>11966
Words can’t describe the amount of fucking anger I’m feeling you nigger
No.11975
Anonymous
Image:166423130488.jpg(26kB, 587x522)tom.jpeg
>>11966
>>11967
The saddest thing, is that after all of this she will inevitably get support again 2024 more likely without rigging. Why? Because of the good amount of OCs and the relationships between characters in each round that happened between days have increased her chances of at least make it past qualifiers. Fuck, I've already seen that chibi Shirley posted like for the seventh time now since the afterparty. Saying this as someone who supported Shirley and will too in 2024. However, if by some reason she's doing TOO well, quickly check those votes again. Thankfully the new rule will be applied for the new hosts to come.
No.11982
Anonymous
Replies:>>12077
Image:166425514468.jpg(259kB, 1171x800)zorak.jpg
>>11943
What upsets the most is that /mlp/ of all goddamn places had the best solution all along to avoid both drama and riggers and it took us this long to solve this on our own. Either that or hosts like Dominos were just attention seekers as proven by the drama surrounding the character with the Hitler pic. From now on anyone willing to host must follow Nightshift's approved rule as main requirement, for the nominees' sakes and for everyone's sakes too.
No.12063
Anonymous
Replies:>>12064
>>11842
Host mismanagement will always put Fang’s win* into question.
No.12064
Anonymous
>>12063
>Still caring
Anon, the tournament ended weeks ago and she won fair and square, it’s time to move on
No.12066
Anonymous
Replies:>>12069
>>12064
>"why do you care?" -guy who very clearly cares just as much as you do
No.12069
Anonymous
Replies:>>12074
>>12066
not him but he's right, ms./co/ ended for this year and we're still talking about it
if anything fang won fair and square and 2nd to 5th places are * worthy but it's nowhere near spinel levels
No.12074
Anonymous
>>12064
>>12069
Not him but we don't even know if Fang won fairly due to NightShift's fuck up.
No.12075
Anonymous
Replies:>>12078
Image:166456291219.jpg(40kB, 400x400)F6DFDBF9-6257-4852-916C-53FE99E503AC.jpeg
>>12074
Get over it, she would’ve beat chel anyway
No.12077
Anonymous
Replies:>>12101
>>11982
>Nightshift's approved rule
Didn't he just make those to bait riggers and what he unjustly assumed to be riggers?
No.12078
Anonymous
>>12075
We don't even know if this is true due to NightShift's fuck up.
No.12079
Anonymous
Replies:>>12083
Image:166456506954.jpg(55kB, 800x800)31FB2DBB-3C84-46EA-A20C-57891112F10B.jpeg
>>12078
No.12081
Anonymous
Replies:>>12083
We also can't assume Johnny Bravo would have beat Jack in 2018 because Cap was rigged, but I don't see anyone arguing in favor of giving Johnny an asterisk for this reason.
Holy shit, just shut the fuck up and get over it.
No.12083
Anonymous
Image:166456570163.jpg(41kB, 628x628)z50xp-1619719725-16226-list_items-no.jpg
>>12079
>>12081
>get over it
No.12086
Anonymous
Replies:>>12093
>>12083
Then continue seething till the end of time, we already moved on. End of conversation
No.12088
Anonymous
Replies:>>12091
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO FANG WON LEGITIMATELY! SHE SHOULDN'T HAVE AN ASTERISK! SHE WON FAIR AND SQUARE!!!!!!! JUST G-GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!!
No.12091
Anonymous
Replies:>>12093
>>12088
And he’s finally lost it, good to know you have admitted defeat, good day sir
No.12093
Anonymous
Replies:>>12101
>>12086
>End of conversation
It will never end.
>>12091
That Anon isn't me though.
No.12094
Anonymous
So what you people are saying is that even if a host fucks up, rigs the tournament and causes an illegitimate finals then we should just get over it, let the characters off squeaky clean and let the host get away with it and perhaps even let him host the next tournament even?
No.12097
Anonymous
>>12094
its just one or two guys who're still up in arms about this, it'll die off soon
No.12101
Black Hand ## Developer
>>11942
>>11956
>>12074
>>12077
>>12078
>>12083
>>12093
>>12094
Dear numnuts, please stop abusing the report function. Just because someone posts something you don't like, doesn't make it a rule violation. You need to get over it.
No.12102
Anonymous
>>12101
Joel*
No.12103
Anonymous
>>12101
*Cumnuts
No.12104
Anonymous
>>12101
All of my reports are fair and just.
No they are not.
No.12106
Anonymous
Image:166459417451.png(537kB, 600x900)1564151271468.png
>>12104
Tourney BTFO'd
No.12114
Anonymous
Image:166460648967.jpg(23kB, 640x480)aeee9f0c-6b66-4538-a933-60eb2587a945_screenshot.jpg
>>12104
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No.12116
Anonymous
>>12104
OH NO NO NO
No.12127
Anonymous
Image:166465835119.png(333kB, 552x510)unknown (1).png
>>12104
No.12129
Anonymous
>>12104
Cumnuts, everyone.
No.12132
Anonymous
Image:166466727589.png(161kB, 456x543)823.png
>>12104
How is it possible for one moderator to be this based and one loser to be this stupid
No.12161
Anonymous
>Post the truth about *
>Some sperglord schizos out and gets b&
Love to see it
No.12295
Anonymous
Velma's chances have tanked next year.
No.12392
Black Hand ## Developer
And he is *still* making bogus reports....
No.12395
Anonymous
Image:166553293379.jpg(23kB, 421x369)1594238491778.jpg
>>12392
>Tourney is actually this much of a faggot
You can't make this shit up
No.12398
Anonymous
Image:166554069211.jpg(141kB, 1024x828)1580084487335.jpg
>>12392
when will it end?
No.12406
Anonymous
Replies:>>12415
>>12392
Is it true you banned Numnuts from this site?
No.12415
Black Hand ## Developer
>>12406
He is on extended leave for the remainder of the year.
No.14951
Anonymous
Image:166998942087.jpg(363kB, 1920x1440)ms colympus.jpg
Sorry for resurrecting the thread, but those slowpokes finally delivered...
No.14954
Anonymous
>>14951
Pizdec
No.14955
Anonymous
Replies:>>14956
>>14951
imagine getting killed by the ms./co/ rocket
No.14956
Anonymous
>>14955
that's what happened to Stats last year