/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


File allowance: 3MB mp4, 3MB webm, 3MB swf, 3MB mp3, 3MB gif, 3MB png, 3MB jpg

Stats: 32 posts, 7 images (total attachments: 7)

Toggle poster info Replying to /tnt/8537 Close window
Options
No.8537
Removal of any thread mentioning the tournaments Anonymous
save file
image:164470751704.png(312kB , 458x485 , 1643597372819.png)
Is there a reason why jannies remove threads that even slightly mention the tournaments?
No.8538
Anonymous
>>8537
It's a whole thing where the mods consider the tournaments to be meta and thus must be banned
At least on /co/ that is
No.8539
Anonymous
Replies:>>8540
>>8537
Something something meta therefore off-topic, something something roleplaying.
But I have my own conspiracy theory that this is just the works of one specific jannie/mod and his personal bias againts the tournaments, like with almost every other jannie on /co/.
No.8540
Anonymous
Replies:>>8724
>>8539
it has to be, because if you think about it just making a thread and talking about certain aspects of the tournaments isn't really that meta, it's like any other thread on the board
No.8575
Anonymous
Replies:>>8576
>>8537
Are they doing it on /v/ too?
No.8576
Anonymous
Replies:>>8584
>>8575
The two last afterparty threads of King /v/ were deleted, but outside of that nothing else.
No.8584
Anonymous
>>8576
I don't think that was a mod being malicious though I think they just had enough and didn't think we needed a full 24 hours for an afterparty thread
No.8724
Anonymous
Replies:>>8728>>8729
save file
image:164780225059.png(707kB , 1108x1010 , 1647627598811.png)
>>8540
For what's worth, I can more or less give confirmation that the jannie responsible for getting tournament discussion threads removed is the same one who has been deleting Homestuck threads for years.
These two were deleted around the same time yesterday.
desuarchive.org/co/thread/129432886
desuarchive.org/co/thread/129419358
Maybe it's a little bit far-fetched on my part, but an interesting consideration nonetheless.
No.8728
Anonymous
save file
image:164781774407.jpg(14kB , 366x332 , wtf.jpg)
>>8724
For what is essentially an anarchic board where everything related to a certain topic can be posted, those rules genuinely confuse me.
No.8729
Anonymous
Replies:>>8741
>>8724
>desuarchive.org/co/thread/129432886
to be fair with the channel pic and obscure question I reckon the janny thought it was a low-effort thread and just cleaned it up
No.8732
Anonymous
Replies:>>8736
Just made another stealth tournament thread on /co/ to see how long it will last at this time.
No.8736
Anonymous
Replies:>>8739>>8740
>>8732
The jannie is too fucking dumb to actually detect stealth threads. Sadly most other anons are on a similar camp, so these threads still end up getting archived quite early.
No.8739
Anonymous
Replies:>>8746
>>8736
Well here's the link if you're interested.
https://boards.4channel.org/co/thread/129465193
No.8740
Anonymous
>>8736
That’s a good thing though, the more subdue the better. If everyone caught on so would janny
No.8741
Anonymous
>>8729
Doubt it. I can't recall Channel threads getting deleted, and a similar tournament discussion thread was made a few days prior, just with a picture of Jenny instead.
desuarchive.org/co/thread/129362340/
No.8746
Anonymous
>>8739
The thread actually had decent success. Good job everyone.
No.8779
Anonymous
Replies:>>8780
>>8537
>Janny deleted post mentioning Ms and Mr /co/ on a /co/ meta thread right before deleting said /co/ meta thread

Yikes
No.8780
Anonymous
>>8779
They really, REALLY want to kill the board.
No.8901
Anonymous
save file
image:165127723330.png(2MB , 7504x4971 , 1651265364198.png)
>>8537
I was browsing through /co/ deleted threads archive and found this thing. Is anyone of you working on this? because looks like a cool idea
https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/130308002
No.8902
Anonymous
Replies:>>8904
>>8901
The link isn't working.
No.8903
Anonymous
Was the orel peterson thread deleted by the mods?
No.8904
Anonymous
Replies:>>8906>>8912
save file
image:165128590683.png(5kB , 1311x264 , Captura.PNG)
>>8902
Works fine to me, nevertheless, There isn't anything else outside from the pic related.
No.8905
Anonymous
Replies:>>8907
save file
image:165129634317.png(348kB , 540x662 , Cherri.png)
>>8901
Now that I think about it, did this Tag Team even had a bracket made?
No.8906
Anonymous
Replies:>>8915
>>8904
Seems very redundant since we already have Ms. /co/.
The rules don't even make much sense either.
No.8907
Anonymous
>>8905
No. Due to Temp starting the tournament right after King /v/ with no warning Bracketanon just never showed up most likely because he never knew the tournament existed.
No.8912
Anonymous
>>8901
>>8904
Kek, that's just a poor, lost newfag.
No.8915
Anonymous
Replies:>>8917
>>8906
Sure, but that's for 2000s stuff only, so basically any FoTM is out, so It could be more interesting in that regard.
No.8916
Anonymous
>>8901
well someone can’t handle waiting..
No.8917
Anonymous
Replies:>>8918
>>8915
2010s characters have almost no presence here. It certainly makes no sense to make yet another spin-off tournament when 2000s stuff has proven time and time again to be the dominant force of these contests.
No.8918
Anonymous
Replies:>>8919>>8920
save file
image:165151535203.jpg(46kB , 553x665 , wrgr.jpg)
>>8917
Not him but.
>Fang
>Hilda
>Johanna
>Lord Dominator
>Pearl
>Peridot
>No presence
Three out of four Ms. /co/ Elite Eights have two 2010s characters. And no, i am not counting Spinel.
No.8919
Anonymous
>>8918
ALMOST no presence. Those are still six characters out of the 28 who are part of the female Elite Eight, not even going to mention the guys' elite has no 2010s representation whatsoever.
And I'm not making a case as to why newer characters should participate (I barely watch modern cartoons), just saying that the idea of a 2000s exclusive tourney is dumb as bricks.
No.8920
Anonymous
>>8918
>still not counting spinel
JUST