/tnt/ - Tournaments & Events

This board is for hosting tournaments and other organized competitions, be it either events, contests, or anything where a winner must be determined through votes or otherwise. Just for this board, image duplicates are enabled and the bump limits are set extra high. Roleplaying is encouraged, unless event hosts ask otherwise.


Thread stats: 14 posts, 2 files (2 image(s))

Replying to /tnt/237795
Options
No.237795
Mr./Ms. /co/ Off-Season Discussion Thread #23Anonymous
Image:177916400789.jpg(2.31MB, 2783x2785)toonami.jpg
Only on Toonami edition
No.237797
Anonymous
Replies:>>237798
Toonami will never be allowed in the /co tourneys.
No.237798
Anonymous
>>237797
…unless it's specifically referring to TOM and SARA. They're cool and /co/ legal.
No.237800
Anonymous
Replies:>>237807
Image:177916571009.png(676kB, 1920x1080)1748054395958929.png
>Thread for western comics and cartoons
>Anime OP image
No.237803
Anonymous
Replies:>>237808
>there's an anon absolutely seething over TADC in the last thread
All because people want one zoomer pick to win.
No.237807
Anonymous
>>237800
When are only options are pick related and Circuslop, I'd go with an anime OP image too.
No.237808
Anonymous
>>237803
Spinel has already won tho.
No.237810
Anonymous
Why are people so desperate to return to ms. /co/ 2021 after Frankie and Raven?
No.237811
Anonymous
Replies:>>237812
>>237810
FARTS is sitting this year out aside from Fraudzula who is a tier below the rest of the acronym powerhouses
No.237812
Anonymous
>>237811
>Fraudzula who is a tier below the rest of the acronym powerhouses
Does that really matter when she's a 2000s character?
No.237813
Anonymous
>>237810
I think a large portion of anons now simply weren't around for Ms. /co/'s before 2024 so don't know or care about all the meta baggage in the tourney.
No.237814
Anonymous
Replies:>>237815
Interesting how people complaining about the /co/ OPs yet /v/ had an OP that was just Kevin Nash and BBC and no one bat an eye.
No.237815
Anonymous
Replies:>>237816
>>237814
/v/ having shit OP's means it's okay we have shit OP's?
No.237816
Anonymous
>>237815
Yeah, kind of.