/pco/ - Promotions

>>200400
Think about something else

Everything I try to post is duplicate on some other thread...

>>200452
edit it, put a dot with paint

>>200455
or if it's a .png change it in paint to a . jpg

here is a pic of Saoirse from the Irish animated movie Song of the Sea made by Fuchur >>199883

>>200397
I love Fuchur's stuff but I dont see why this thread exists. Hes on hiatus. There is no point in this thread.

>>200539
It's only because people were shitting up the request thread talking about him.

>>200538
Fuchur did this?
Damn fine job!

>>201417
Damn that really sucks. Some people are just plain morons.

PFF Fuchur quits drawing. As if. :P

>>201417
we already know this...It is a real shame especially with the list of on model loli he was probably going to do....

only when he does 3d models he quits....damn very unfortunate he could of really made so dreamy stuff...

Just think all this loli law bullshit started with one guy in the airport ruining it for all of us.

Was never a problem before till now fuck this world we live in where even drawing is possible jail sentence.

>>201417
Bummer.

>>201423
Tumblr Witch hunts just compounding that problem.

Can we keep politics off this board, please? If not feel free to head to another chan.

>>201444
Trips confirm. /pco/ is for porn, not politics.

He says he quit drawing.. didn't say anything about digital art

>>201461
>quits drawing
>digital art
>DRAWING
>ART

You are one dense motherfucker, or in the context of this board, a dense kiddyfucker.

>>201464
he is probably talking about the rendered stuff.

>>201465
Which takes a fuck-long more time to create that drawing, what with the modelling multiple characters, rigging, texturing, rendering.

If he's quit drawing, what makes you think he'd continue to pursue something that easily takes 50x longer to create?

>>201465
Yeah sorry I meant to say the computer generated imagery he's been dabbling in lately, as opposed to organic hand drawn art. I'm hopeful he hasn't quit building models which can be shared as others can construct porn of his creations that way.

>>201464
>>201466
You gonna be okay?

>>201466
>If he's quit drawing, what makes you think he'd continue to pursue something that easily takes 50x longer to create?
I doubt you would understand it when it's all a matter of time to you.

>>201471
And I doubt anyone who selfishly cares more about getting their kiddy fap than an artist's wellbeing will understand the concepts of 'empathy' and 'burn out'.

>>201473
Fuchur can't stop drawing, any more than he can hold back the tide. He'll be back. That's all we're hoping for.

>>201460
Err... last time I posted that pic i got banned for a day for Bestiality posting

>Beastiality bans
>on a R34 boards

Fail.

>>201477
yeah, they've really got shit for brains.

>>201477
>>201478
It was only for a day but i was very surprised myself i didn't know you could get banned for that...

it like getting a ban for posting censored loli or evening requesting loli on 4chan if its not fully posted I really don't see how that is a reason to ban some one.

>>201479
I guess there's so little traffic the mods are that desperate for attention, they'll enforce misguided rules no matter how ridiculous.

>>201484
Or you could just follow the rules.

>>201486
>the rules justify themselves

Or you could just post somewhere else. Usually what happens.

>>201488
Rules keep boards on topic so yea hate to say it, if one does not like the rules, one should piss off elsewhere.

>>201494
the topic is cartoon and comic pornography, they banned cartoon pornography

It's like /co/ banning some cartoons because they happen not to like them.

>>201500
And your point is..?

>>201480
If the owner of a website does not want content posted and you post it or request it, you are going to get banned. Censored porn is porn.

Nooooo, I never got that Bridge to Terabithia request!

Why God, why?!

>>201460
>>201476
Well this guy didn't get banned and his pic removed but this guy did...looks like the mods are playing favorites.

>>201533
Didn't he say he did that but choose not to post it..

>>201561
How are they playing favourites they don't know anybody on a personal level, it's an anonymous message board

>>201587
who ever was harassing him mod should've banned them..but they didn't...now one of the best artist are gone forever.

>>201566
Maybe by the ip address? that is how they ban you.

>>201587
Fucker crossed the line with that 3D toddler pic.

>>201564
Yes, he tortured me

>>201604
that's right he makes sure everyone knows he has a loud of work no one will ever see.

funny how the main attraction of this site is artists posting here and mods do nothing about anons trying to drive them away

>>201609
like who?

>>201621
they know who they are.

>>201460
lol big red letters

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Well i'm glad i'm not the only one but now i feel guilty. XD

>>201624
Banned for what?
Did their file feature beastiality?
Missed it.

>>201626

Yes It did it was here since yesterday morning it was the 3rd one of this set had a puppy doing her in the ass. >>200439 >>200440

>>201627
-_-
Tough stuff.
We all have our preferences, but beastiality, guros, gays and dickgirls aren't mine.

>>201635
Not into it either i'm more into the girl then the dog it just done very well.

There was a pic of kids cumming on a dog is it beastiality if the dicks are not in the animal or vice versa?

>>201644
I'm sure feral animals in a pornographic image with humans is enough to call bestiality.

ITT pedos dicsussing if it's right if an animal, not a human, fucks an underage character. While the mods are like "Hmm no, bestiality on a rule 34 board where everyone and everything fucks everyone and everything goes too far!"

Blech.

>>201702
>the "P" word
If you mean pedophile, then don't censor it. You insist the word is not an insult, so don't act like it is. Also it looks childish.

>>201701
It's a shitpost thread. There are around ten images. What do you expect?
>While the mods are like "Hmm no, bestiality on a rule 34 board where everyone and everything fucks everyone and everything goes too far!"
The mods aren't saying anything. Rules are set, and staff ensure that posts abide to them. They've been that way for years.

who cares about bestiality just be grateful we can post loli here

>>201644
>There was a pic of kids cumming on a dog is it beastiality if the dicks are not in the animal or vice versa?
If you need this strictly outlined, you my have gone too far down the rabbit hole. (Yes, it's bestiality.)

>>201727
I just put quoted how the guy said it, that's why i said "P" word. Should've read my post to the end.

>>201733
So far i've seen two posts by admins on this board (actually admin and a mod, i think) and i can't tell if they're being ironic or not. One was when the guy said he would report someone to authorities for posting an UAB comparison picture and calling UAB "problematic", and in this case the guy on a board that is ONLY alive because no one wants to host lolicon calling bestiality "too far down the rabbit hole". Pretty funny.

I don't have a problem with no besti\guro whatever rules, it's just the choice of words is amusing.

>>201733
I was really just asking causes i wanted to make sure...

>>201727
Indeed. It's quite amusing how these guys will jerk off to all sorts of underaged porn, but still vehemently deny being a pedophile.

>>201769
Drawing a nude cartoon of a child does not make them a pedophile just like drawing someone dead does not make them a murderer.


This hole what you draw is what you are thing is fucking stupid.

>>201777
if you have a sexual attraction to children or sexually enjoy pornography of children, you are by definition a pedophile. Not a child molester, a pedophile.

If you enjoy porn of dead people, you are a necrophiliac. Doesn't mean you fuck dead people.

>>201733
Hey moose, should this thread be treated as /pco/'s version of pol thread?

>>201780
>Hey moose, should this thread be treated as /pco/'s version of pol thread?
Eh. Sure, though I won't enforce it. Topics like this flare up and down.

>>201780
Thank you. I must say, the level of denial I've seen in these threads is staggering.

>>201780
The definition also pertainable to child-like proportions of cartoon characters.
If you stuck Lilo's head on Nani's body, would pedo's still find all-grown-up Lilo attractive?

>>201808

Nani's body is NEITHER cute OR chubby!


So... no.

>>201817
And of course, nani is not a 3ft tall kiddie height. Gotta like them small, easy to stuff into suitcases and smuggle across Thailand borders.

>>201818
Aren't you that self-proclaimed self-hating pedo? At least shitpost on 4chan's /pol/ and not here, you can even post pictures of little girls there, from what i've seen.

>>201820

He has to be. THAT, or just one low-blow-hitting troll!

>>201820
>you can even post pictures of little girls there, from what i've seen.
wat

>>201823
IKR?

>>201823
>>201844
Well i mean, not inappropriate ones. Just regular stuff. I was just saying that if he wants to angrily shitpost about loli=pedo he can do that on a much bigger platform where he can even attach relevant pictures.

Here's why Fuchur should share his 3D models

http://rule34hentai.net/post/view/159592

It's like waving raw meat in front of a starving dog. It's not fair.

>>201880
I don't get it.

>>201913
So we can all play with them like models on a casting couch and create pornographic images of them

>>201914
That thing you posted is probably Fuchur's worst nightmare. Not only is the model shit, but now people are making it look even worse with their terrible animations. It's the reason why he should not share his models.

>>201920
It's already happening. 3D is the new frontier. Thanks to SFM and XNALara, users need no artistic talent, only the ability to pose CG models, to create porn. We just need the models.

>>201923
>users need no artistic talent
A lot of non-artists seem to believe this nonsense. Which is why 90% of all 3D porn look like utter shit. The animation part requires just as much artistic skill as building the characters. Some people need more time than others to realize this.

>>201923
This was a good chuckle.

http://rule34hentai.net/image/147778

>>201928
I just meant that these days you don't need the technical know-how to build a character, say, Lara Croft, digitally, from scratch, and rig her with mechanics, to make porn of her, because chances are some other person with such know-how and talent, be it game developer or master sculptor like Fuchur, has already built the loli Riley Anderson model the world covets >___<

>>202472
no its a repost
and he said "I have a job though. So no time for private projects at all, which is why I quit." yesterday

>>202474
But maybe as a hooby at free time could work
Anyway in the end he took a decision with this no matter how good his art is

I wonder how many commissions he did.

Ones that we'll never see...

>>202502
It all depends if someone's willing to share....

>>202758
Well, I go between wanting to share and wanting it private. I can never really decide