/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Thread stats: 54 posts, 14 files (14 image(s))

Replying to /co/477560
Options
No.477560
DC Thread #2: Thread of Two WorldsAnonymous
Replies:>>480934
Image:174510653464.jpg(341kB, 624x960)Flash of Two Worlds.jpg
A thread for all things DC.

Previous thread: >>227246
No.477610
Anonymous
Image:174511055866.jpg(2.24MB, 2584x2276)DC Recommendation Chart.jpg
Feel like we need to update this chart. Suggestions? What should be kept, what should be removed?
No.477617
Anonymous
>>477610
Does /co/ still like New Super-Man?
No.477682
Anonymous
Image:174511634704.jpg(7.60MB, 5000x3868)The New History of the DC Universe #1.jpg
How many literal who's can you recognize here?
No.477683
Anonymous
Image:174511640164.jpg(1.35MB, 2048x1585)The New History of the DC Universe #2.jpeg
Or here?
No.477719
Anonymous
>>477683
>bottom left
Red Bee my beloved.
No.477816
Anonymous
>>477683
>The DC Universe as we know it begins to take shape as a mysterious ship crash-lands in Smallville, and years later, Superman makes his debut. Meanwhile, in Gotham City, Batman emerges from the shadows to clean its crime-ridden streets, and after years of isolation from Man's World, Wonder Woman leaves the paradise of Themyscira for modern society.
Unless there's a catch, it looks like they'll actually be making Diana part of the Silver Age of heroes with Clark and Bruce, so I wonder if the Golden Age WW from the first issue will actually just be Hippolyta.
No.477828
Anonymous
>>477617
DEI Superman, you mean?
No.478003
Anonymous
Image:174516834662.jpg(1.79MB, 2999x2288)COIE.jpg
There's something very DC about putting out a book meant to simplify their continuity for new readers, only to spaghetti junction things by constantly hitting the Crisis reset button.
No.478018
Anonymous
Replies:>>478153
>>477610
Pretty solid chart. I can't think of much that could be added, maybe something from Geoff Johns' Green Lantern (Sinestro War ?) since it's such a classic /co/ favorite.
If you wanted to add some more modern stuff, I did enjoy that Superman's Pal: Jimmy Olsen comic from a couple years back.
No.478073
Anonymous
Replies:>>478075
>>478003
I dunno if this is a hot take or not, but I kinda dig DC's complicated history.
No.478075
Anonymous
Replies:>>480929
>>478073
It's not a bad thing in itself, it's just funny that COIE did the opposite of what it was meant to do.
No.478153
Anonymous
>>478018
Some of the choices in the chart feel very specific to the time it was created, like Dial H and 52. I can't remember the last time a /co/mrade so much as mentioned them.

That might not mean anything though, given that the general quality of discussion on /co/ Prime has been shit for a decade.
No.478175
Anonymous
>Waid is using New 52 Justice League origin for his upcoming DC History Guide
Fucking why, not even New 52 zoomers like Cyborg as a League founder
No.478300
Anonymous
>>478175
Lame, I was hoping DC had given up on that shit by now.
No.478331
Anonymous
Replies:>>478406
>>478153
>I can't remember the last time a /co/mrade so much as mentioned them.

Perhaps it has to do with the fact that these are comics at this point are already 13/19 years old so their relevance has long since disappeared from people’s minds. Especially since they were basically isolated miniseries essentially. How many people talk about a series like Resurrection Man, outside of the times DC has tried to revive it for another series? Or post-IC Shadowpact run? Chase? Chronos? Kate Spencer Manhunter?


There’s also the undeniable fact that most people these days don’t post about comics they like or do recommendations anymore because now the board basically is all about just complaining how everything sucks and you’re a shill if you say you like anything new. Because people don’t actually read anything anymore so they don’t have any knowledge about anything beyond a point where they rage quit or whatever so they just react to things based on what they see other people saying, which is usually someone purposefully stirring shit or making up things for bait, or even more depressingly they get their information from an outrage grifter channel.

>>478175
Cyborg being a JL member was the best thing that had happened to the character in forty years. Yet Titans fanboys do nothing but complain about it like it was the end of the world even though they can’t cite anything positive about Cyborg beyond the fact they liked him when he debuted as a Titan and thus he can’t ever grow or move on from the book.
No.478337
Anonymous
>>478175
Will they try to make it so J'onn was also a founder at the same time and the JL was originally 8 before Cyborg went off to the Teen Titans?
No.478376
Anonymous
>>477617
Yep

>>477828
Spoken like a true incel imbecile
No.478406
Anonymous
Replies:>>478423
>>478331
>Perhaps it has to do with the fact that these are comics at this point are already 13/19 years old so their relevance has long since disappeared from people’s minds.
Yeah, that's what I meant by them being specific to the moment the chart was made. They looked significant at the time, but time's passed and they turned out not to have staying power.

But that's a problem that besets all these charts and lists, even ones put together by professional critics. You look at examples from 10 and 20 years ago and you'll always find some flash-in-the-pan stuff mixed in with the old and modern classics.

>There’s also the undeniable fact that most people these days don’t post about comics they like or do recommendations anymore because now the board basically is all about just complaining how everything sucks and you’re a shill if you say you like anything new.
Exactly, yes. The unsubtle culture war recruitment threads (posted by actual shills) and irony-poisoned "too cool to enjoy anything" dorks (useful idiots) smothered any sincere effort at engaging with new comics. Hell, even old comics didn't seem to give modern /co/ any real pleasure, and only existed for many anons as totemic examples of a vanished "golden age".
No.478423
Anonymous
Replies:>>478472
>>478406
The thing with staying power is that fandoms love way too much obsessing over stupid shit so they keep talking about the same handful of nitpicked, largely superfluous shit like what they think x,y and z comics are “important” or worse, storylines they hate. And the latter gets talked about endlessly for years (even when it’s usually just regurgitating how you hate it and the writer) while people completely ignore discussions about things that are just enjoy even if they aren’t perhaps the most iconic stories.
No.478472
Anonymous
Image:174524567701.jpg(271kB, 976x1500)LOSH.jpg
>>478423
>fandoms love way too much obsessing over stupid shit
It's called maladaptive behavior. They learn one (bad) strategy for engaging with other people, in this case over a shared hobby, and for many it becomes their only strategy. No room for personal growth.

>even when it’s usually just regurgitating how you hate it and the writer
This. You could create a thread celebrating the Waid/Kitson LOSH (which Old /co/ loved!) and it would just devolve into endless bitching about Waid himself.
No.478490
Anonymous
Replies:>>478555
>>477617
issue 3 had one of the most Morrison moments ever seen in a DC comic book and we shit bricks when we saw it
Also it's a great comic book on its own merits and it stays
No.478492
Anonymous
>>477828
go back to the sharty, retard
No.478555
Anonymous
>>478490
NTA but it's been a minute since I read a Superman book. Can you talk a bit about this one? The "Morrison moment" sounds intriguing.
No.478785
Anonymous
Image:174526653103.jpg(221kB, 1200x1004)batgirls.jpg
Kinda funny how Babs isn't the original or most competent or strongest Batgirl, yet she's the one everyone knows and is usually the only Batgirl to appear in most Bat-media.
No.478796
Anonymous
>>478785
She happened to be the one most 'grew up with' and got featured in pivitol media so she became the default.

Even though she's shit and only ever worth a damn as Oracle where she actually had a niche in the batfamily.
No.478811
Anonymous
>>478796
I have a bit of a soft spot for her. I just wish DC would assign someone who can actually do a good job of writing her as Batgirl.
No.478883
Anonymous
Replies:>>478899
>>478153
I bring up Dial H semi-often in conversations about good comics from DC in the modern era.
You're right that it doesn't get brought up often, but like you said discussion on /co/ prime is shit. Being more representative of older /co/ tastes is a good thing!
No.478894
Anonymous
>>478796
>Even though she's shit

She’s not though.
No.478899
Anonymous
>>478883
>Being more representative of older /co/ tastes is a good thing!
True.
No.479895
Anonymous
Image:174535865443.jpg(254kB, 805x1024)Psycho Pirate.jpg
>>478003
No.480906
Anonymous
Image:174548653175.png(11kB, 1051x66)1738049353495.png
No.480929
Anonymous
>>478075
COIE did clear up, and uncomplicate, a huge swath of things for a good while, but the problem is editorial not doing their jobs, or ignoring their jobs, as DC did for the Nu52, in allowing Cereal Lord to keep his spectrum and other Lantern BS, and even more so, the nonsense with Bruce being all of sudden in his 20s but having two adult former Robins, Tim AND the fucking demon spawn around as teens.
No.480933
Anonymous
>>480929
Neverending comicbook universes are all an utterly convoluted cancerous mess, and the succession of people working it are never up to the task of maintaining quality & cohesion.

Capeshit writers in particular seem bad at it, since even examples of settings that are only semi-extended like Invincible are also badly written/worldbuilt.
No.480934
Anonymous
Image:174548963629.gif(2.61MB, 600x600)sad kara.gif
>>477560
>all things DC
TIL that "Waffles Waffles Waggles" is the longest running animated DC adaption ever.
No.480978
Anonymous
>>480929
I just don't think that anything that followed COIE made junking Earth-One and Earth-Two worthwhile. The continuity "problems" of those settings really only mattered to a handful of loud wonks and simply weren't as issue to most readers.
No.481119
Anonymous
Replies:>>481134
>>480978
It absolutely did. Earth-2 was just a lazy gimmick you occasionally did a crossover with. You got way better stories when everyone is on the same Earth
No.481134
Anonymous
Replies:>>481152
>>481119
I fundamentally disagree with you, but I don't contest your moral right to be wrong.
No.481152
Anonymous
>>481134
That is indeed an opinion
No.481183
Anonymous
Replies:>>481206
>>480978
>really only mattered to a handful of loud wonk
I agree with the anon saying that the Mainline Canon universe was better when the teams were on the same Earth - that said, personally, what COIE should have done, versus killing off people needless (e.g. Kara, and by extension someone like PeeGee so there's only one Kryptonian), was getting rid of the unnecessary and needless characters.

This was all before the Demon Spawn, and before the unnecessary additions two other female Robins, but we still had three Robins; they should have just gotten rid of Jason, for example, and made Tim the eventual replacement for Dick - and by eventually, I mean years down the road, not straight away. I'm mean this is just spitballing, but what made continuity confusing (which was the point of COIE) was shit like - similar with X-Dudes and LoSH, and other large teams. Same shit with the Hawks, THAT's what COIE could have (and to a lesser extent did) fix/fixed.

tl;dr LOUD WONKS aren't casuals and normies - the audience (e.g. point) wasn't LOUD WONKS, it was casuals and normies.
No.481206
Anonymous
>>481183
>getting rid of the unnecessary and needless characters.
I don't think that had to be done either. Characters who appeared superfluous or who weren't being used could simply have been parked until a creative team came along and found uses for them.
No.481414
Anonymous
Replies:>>481508
>>481206
That’s exactly what CoIE did in practice.
No.481435
Anonymous
Replies:>>481460
>>481206
>>481206
People are bitching today and for the past few years because (a) there's too many bat books and (b) where is a (i) zatanna book, (ii) grifter/authority/gen13, etc. book, (iii) or whatever else pops up, which DC has at least been trying with mini-series to meet and then people complain about those.
No.481460
Anonymous
>>481435
Turns out fans will always complain and never be happy
No.481498
Anonymous
Replies:>>481499
so what does /co in exile teach us?
it's not that anons no longer care about DC
it's that anons can be fussed about waifus and cartoons
but not about comics
and yes, you weeb-heads, that means your manga shit as well.
No.481499
Anonymous
No.481508
Anonymous
Replies:>>481544
>>481414
In practice, COIE either eliminated them or reintroduced them into books that of necessity had no continuity with their Earth-One or Earth-Two originals.
No.481544
Anonymous
Replies:>>481550
>>481508
Yes it’s called parking characters until you found a way to reintroduce them
No.481550
Anonymous
>>481544
No, it's called overkill. You don't need to junk Earth-One and Earth-Two just to park characters who weren't being used. You can park them while keeping E-1 and E-2 with their continuities stretching back decades, in E-2's case back to the genesis of the DC shared universe.
No.481556
Anonymous
Replies:>>481558
Image:174559605604.png(1.45MB, 1207x899)Screenshot_1078.png
watching BTAS right now
No.481558
Anonymous
Replies:>>481562
Image:174559628211.jpg(463kB, 1171x1800)tales-of-the-batman-steve-englehart.jpg
>>481556
You're making me nostalgic for the Steve Englehart run. Such a classic.
No.481559
Anonymous
Image:174559633263.png(1.54MB, 1163x899)Screenshot_256.png
i also watched STAS some time ago, i thought that BTAS would be boring but every episode surprise me
No.481562
Anonymous
Image:174559642861.png(1.49MB, 1440x900)Screenshot_1058.png
>>481558
nice cover, i really like when batman is scared, laugh or smile