>>439719 Its weird a character who only existed in a single deleted scene for a really bad move managed to become a FotM on /co/ proper. Like its more of a reach than usual for these things. Slapping a NSFW spoiler on this just in case.
>>440453 Considering what good ol' Pepe is like this image makes him look like a groomer. Think its the expression on his face and the ensemble that do it
>>440554 The archie cast of characters are just awful. You can say that about alot of the SONIC FRIENDS that were introduced to the franchise of the years but the archie comics specifically are terrible with the soap opera dramas.
>A woman in man’s clothing fucking a man in woman’s clothing is still by all accounts still straight because both types of genitalia are present and both gender roles are being fulfilled.
Was browsing through my image folder that has been carried through multiple computers. Some images are so very small now that resolution has increased over time.
>>473586 That reminds me of the behind the scenes reasons for Jiji to not have a line at the end of the film. Most know the regular explanation, but I heard that once Miyazaki said "Jiji does not speak there because I had nothing to say at the time". I believe the second version.
>>477997 This is true of really any 80s or 90s movie tie-in cartoon. You get the broad strokes, but the details are off. Not necessarily a bad thing though.
>>482357 Is she /co/? She seems more /a/ than anything. We used to have a random image posting thread on /baw/ where anything went, but it hit autosage a long time ago.
Isn't there a specific ritual in the Catholic Church when it comes to new Popes to specifically check they aren't a crossdressing woman?