/baw/ - General Discussion

>>410553
Britain again:

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-nireland-appeal-idUKKCN12S15T?

Yes, I am aware of this blog’s bias, but still: http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/johnwright/trump_claims_election_workers_are_throwing_away_30_of_mail_in_ballots

“I don’t love the concept of ballots.” — Donald Trump, 2016 Republican candidate in the election for the office of President of the United States

Finally found a case of in-person voter fraud for the conservatives to get mad at--a Trump voter voted by mail and then voted in person because she wanted to "de-rig" the election.

And was almost immediately caught because we actually do keep track of whether or not a person has voted, making all this fuss people make about in-person voter fraud all the stupider.

The vision of a man standing on a corner, naked but for a sandwich board, screaming about "YouTube Truths!"

>>410572
His eyes wild, his hair unkempt. He has neither bathed nor shaved for weeks. He doesn't have time. He must make sure all the blind people of this world see the truth. That the only man who can save this world is an amoral idiot billionaire with a bad fake tan and a worse toupee.

>>410573
>billionaire
FAKE billionaire, in fact

>>410574
Heretic!

>>410577
I mean, he's not going to win so sorry Probably the UK, Brexit still wins out for Most Embarrassing Political Direction From A First World Nation.


Or, well, DID until South Korea swept in for an unexpected dark horse victory. What the fuck, seriously.

>>410578
Touché.

>South Korea swept in for an unexpected dark horse victory
I don't think I heard about this. Please explain.

Also, just saw a short news story on Hillary campaigning with Jennifer Lopez. It's odd seeing an entertainer blatantly showing off their ass (no, for real, they even put a fan underneath her to blow up her dress) right next to an older woman running for President. It seems to be an odd mix. Still, has nothing on that le maymay angle she went for (13 year olds and manchildren don't vote, remember?).

>>410578

>he's not going to win

No. Stop being complacent as fuck. Trump has a chance, slim though it may be, to win this election: If Clinton supporters become so confident of her impending victory that they don’t bother to vote, Trump could win states that would otherwise go to Clinton, which would secure the electoral votes he needs to become POTUS. The only way to stop Trump is to vote for Clinton, no matter what you think of her—and that means you have to get off your ass, go to your polling place, and fucking vote for Clinton.

>>410580
I've already voted. I've done my part. From here it's just waiting for the results, for me.

>>410580
>No. Stop being complacent as fuck.
Already voted.
>>410579
>I don't think I heard about this. Please explain.
It turns out that the long-standing, ludicrous conspiracy theory that President Park was the puppet of this cult lady and her friends was true. As in like, she apologized for it on TV. Among other things, the cult lady appointed ministers, wrote speeches, DRESSED HER (in deliberately cheap clothes), set North Korean policy, and was given control of massive amounts of classified information and the budget (much of which she and her friends embezzled).

This woman, and her father the cult founder before her, appear to basically been gaslighting Park since she was in her 20's.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/30/politics/donald-trump-write-in-ballots/index.html

So Donald Trump’s “solution” to the supposed “rigging” of the election is…endorsing in-person voter fraud.

This dumb orange fuck is not only a complete idiot, he doesn’t even respect the basic fucking tenets of democracy. He can’t lose soon enough.

>>410588
>We like BEING respectable instead of just LOOKING respectable.
Sort of a moot point considering we're accomplishing neither.

>>410590
We won't no matter who wins this election either.
The other guy was right, we've not had a good election in decades.

>>410588
Hitler dubs.

>>410589
This is why everyone was mad over the DNC leaks.

>>410588
>LOL. We haven't had a good president since before Bush Sr.
I'd go as far as Kennedy.

Every election since then has been giant douche vs turd sandwich, including this election, with no end in sight.

inb4 giant douche fans complain

>>410588
>We haven't had a good president since before Bush Sr.
Yes, I too hated when Clinton brought us economic prosperity, environmental protection and, while still leaving a lot of room for improvement, improved civil rights for minorities compared to the status quo before his term. And hated when Obama saved us from the economic clusterfuck Bush put us in, finally broke the heinous embargo we've been engaging in on Cuba, improved diplomatic relations with all the countries that hated us after we went crazy post 9/11, forced insurance companies to provide better service to those they were already covering and provide any service for people who they weren't covering, slowed the average rate of increase of insurance premiums, created jobs, tried to salvage our crumbling infrastructure, and did all of that while squaring off against the most obstructive and childish Congress in history.

>>410593
>inb4 giant douche fans complain
It's funny how you realized even when you said all this that what you were saying was wrong. But what do you expect from someone who thinks things were best for the country when segregation was still going on.

>>410583
>This woman, and her father the cult founder before her, appear to basically been gaslighting Park since she was in her 20's.
Fuark. I don't even know what to say about that.

Suddenly I don't feel so bad about any of the Five Eyes' political states.

>>410595
This

>>410595
Nothing that you said is correct.

>Clinton brought us economic prosperity
That wasn't Clinton, that was the world wide web and collapse of the second world which opened new markets.

>improved civil rights for minorities
Clinton signed his Crime bill, which put blacks in prison longer than whites. Remember superpredators?

>evironmental protection
I don't remember Clinton getting anywhere with Kyoto, and his presidency had some of the worst environmental disasters ever. NAFTA pretty much shat on any possibility of environmentalism being established in Mexico.

>the economic clusterfuck Bush put us in
Clinton deleted Glass-Steagall, signed away the protections we've had since the great depression. Which in turn created predatory lending, conglomeration and the 2008 recession. Bush didn't put us in economic clusterfucks, he put us in political and legal clusterfucks with his wars and patriot acts.

Clinton and Bush are the same kind of shitfuck, both are a direct continuation of Bush Sr.

>finally broke the heinous embargo we've been engaging in on Cuba
Embargo is still in place, Obama just announced plans to improve relations, he did fuck all. Even the idea to improve relation wasn't his, it was Collin Petersons. Although it's interesting how you don't mention that Clinton expanded the embargo...

>improved diplomatic relations with all the countries that hated us after we went crazy post 9/11
The entire Muslim world hates us now due to expansions of drone strikes in dozens of different countries under Obama. We're entering a new cold war with Russia because of Obama supporting the Clintons so hard, he's managed to turn the Democratic party into a bunch of McCarthyist warhawks.

>forced insurance companies to provide better service to those they were already covering and provide any service for people who they weren't covering
What a rosy view of the ACA, which has raised premiums for everyone, and which insurance companies are ignoring.

>slowed the average rate of increase of insurance premiums
[citation needed]

>created jobs
The president doesn't "make jobs", he's not the jobs fairy.

>tried to salvage our crumbling infrastructure
[citation needed]

>and did all of that while squaring off against the most obstructive and childish Congress in history.
The reason the GOP had sweeping wins in congress is the lack of popularity in Obamas policies. The GOP wouldn't have had a chance of filling the house and senate if Obama delivered the change he promised.

Obama has been a sort of mediocre president whose only real achievement is boosting American image abroad. He hasn't accomplished anything at home, not even boosting local morale.

Are you retarded or just incredibly young? I can't tell.

>>410600
Keep on trying~ Keep on lying~


God I'm excited for the next couple of years. Trump's ravaged the GOP, and if the Dems play their cards right, this is the best chance they're going to get to break the right as a stable political entity once and for all. It'd shift our political center of gravity to that of proper, civilized countries, such that the Progressives and Centrists in the Dem primary are the real fight and the actual election is more of a formality. It'd be a beautiful thing.

>>410602
Terrifying.

>>410603
For backwards creatures like you, yes.

>>410603

Only if you prefer the political Overton Window where it is right now instead of where it could be without the Religious Right and the Alt-Right pulling one edge of it back toward the 1950s.

>>410588
Regular British guy here: not the one you're replying to. I'm doing almost everything I can to help fix this shit, aside from calling out my shitheel MP for lying down and going along with this shit, and I plan on taking care of that over the next week.

>>410608
I'm the guy he was replying to. (I'm Australian.)

Good luck bro.

>>410605
I prefer a sense of balance, some amount of internal regulation. Two sides keeping each other from becoming extremists.

>>410614
Yeah I agree, the Republicans have to go.

>>410614

Yeah well that ship has sailed in regards to the GOP—look at the obstructionist bullshit they’ve pulled with Obama as an example. The party needs its modern principles annihilated at the polls for it to ever have a chance of saving itself.

>>410618
>look at the obstructionist bullshit they’ve pulled with Obama as an example
Yes, that is the kind of just awful nonsense that occurs when political extremists accept ONLY THEIR VIEWS as EVEN A POSSIBILITY, and want nothing more than the ELIMINATION OF THE OTHER PARTIES, agreed. I, also, wish to avoid that entirely

>>410619

I don’t want the GOP dead. I want the principles for which it stands in 2016—obstructionism of the federal government, “fuck compromise” governing where only Republicans get to decide what laws should be made, the revocation of civil rights for LGBT people, unfettered and irresponsible gun ownership, the repeal of the ACA without any sort of actual replacement in mind, policies such as gerrymandering and voter ID laws to ensure Democrats are given the shaft at the polls, and the re-criminalization of abortion—to die in a hellfire.

>>410620
Agreed, but that's not what the guy i was replying to said.

>>410621

Actually, it is. I should know—I was the guy you were replying to.

>>410622
Breh.
>>410602
>>410603

>>410623

You should’ve mentioned WHICH reply you were talking about, then.

>>410620
Stone I have news for you, that means you want the GOP dead.

And it SHOULD be dead. A functional, modern country cannot be responsibly run by the right. It must be a pull between the left and center.

>>410624
To most, it was obvious, i would think.

>>410625

I have news for you: if the GOP dies, the “center” would likely become the “right” because of the shift in the Overton Window.

>>410627
Nationally yes, but they would remain, in proper global parlance, the center. The Progressive caucus, likewise, is leftist by global measure.

>>410605
>>410628
I'd think any real liberal would want the overton window as wide as possible, considering free exchange of ideas is a keystone of liberal philosophy.

If your enemies ideas are so flawed, then why do you want to hide them? Why not expose the flaws?

The fact that you want to shut down discussion is proof positive that you aren't liberal.

And if you define yourself as progressive, it's only because you are progressing towards fascism.

>>410629
At what point did I suggest I want to hide you (incidentally I'm a centrist, not a progressive, I don't believe in single payer)? I don't want you hidden, you'll be free to rattle around your little Alt-Right monkey cage with all your freaky friends. You'll just be politically neutered, running around with the Johnsons and Steins of the nation, where you belong.

>>410630
I hope you stop being a paranoid hypocritical bastard after the election is over. It's not offensive, but simply annoying.

>>410631
I mean I figure we've got about a week before y'all start rolling out your carefully prepared macros about how the whole thing was rigged by the (((Rothschilds))) but we'll happily accommodate you until then.

"Lol we're not Alt-Right you crazy!" says man posting Alt-Right materials at the same time.

Speaking of Alt-Right dumbasses, that Sam B segment on them is gooooold.

>>410637
Tbh, if Clinton really is on the verge of death, it only makes her victory more appealing to me. I'd happily take Kaine over any of the Big 4.

>>410643
>Tbh, if Clinton really is on the verge of death,
Spoiler alert, she's not.

>>410645
>>410646

Both of you just made horrible posts.

>>410647
Agreed. I hope my parody shitpost image wasn't to blame.

>>410647
Oh, yes, they're very comparable.

Grow a spine, Stone. You can speak out against suicide bait by Your Team without pretending "the world would be better without this politician" is remotely on the same level.

>>410647
>>410650
Then again, i guess you've seen where criticizing the extremists of your own side gets you, since that's where this hatred towards me originated, bofofo

>>410651
The hatred against you originated from your own actions as a steadfast defender of Alt-Right ideology and action, stop trying to cover your ass.

>>410652
Nah. Not sure why I'd lie to try to impress people who routinely tell me to kill myself, lol
>>410653
Sure, whacha wanna talk about.

>>410654
>Nah. Not sure why I'd lie to try to impress people who routinely tell me to kill myself, lol
You're not "lying," just demonstrating your longstanding inability to understand that your reputation is the consequences of your own shitty behavior.

Somehow someone making exactly the same (terrible) post as Slowpoke but substituting Slowpoke's name with Hillary's "crossed a line" in Slowpoke's mind, while his didn't. How very odd that Slowpoke judges his own actions on a different rubric than he does other people's.

>>410655
Oh no, i fully agree. I stepped out of line by critiquing the poor behavior of +4's liberals, and despite once being one of the most liberal people on this site, speaking against The Group proved i was secretly always an alt-right plant.
Okay I'm gonna drop the condescension but that's basically what happened originally, some years ago. Then people acting poorly against me made me criticize them more, which snowballed into uh, this.
>>410656
Can you see why saying "Ted Nugent is dumb as rocks and should just stop talking" to someone is less inflammatory than "you're dumb as rocks and should just stop talking" is?
If not, just feel free to compare the number of deaths Clinton is personally responsible for to the number of deaths I'm personally responsible for, maybe you'll find something there.

>>410630
>im a centrist
>uses "alt right" insult unironically
lol

>Johnsons and Stein
>alt right
LOL

>>410657
>Can you see why saying "Ted Nugent is dumb as rocks and should just stop talking" to someone is less inflammatory than "you're dumb as rocks and should just stop talking" is?

Only in the sense that when the person you're insulting is in the room, you suddenly remember you're supposed to treat them like human beings.

>If not, just feel free to compare the number of deaths Clinton is personally responsible for to the number of deaths I'm personally responsible for, maybe you'll find something there.

Oh, it's just a numbers game now, is it? So then do you believe that Hillary Clinton is personally responsible for more deaths than, say, Abraham Lincoln?

>>410659
Here. If NOTHING else, one will hurt no one, one has the potential to be incredibly harmful to an individual.
Will Ted Nugent ever hear that person complain? Will Clinton ever know that I assume the world would be better if she had died before she ever gained any sort of power?
No, probably not.
But telling that person directly ensures that they hear it, and thus demonstrates active malevolence--an effort put forward to hurt someone.

I don't know, and I think Lincoln was a douche too, so even if not, uh...

>>410657
>Oh no, i fully agree. I stepped out of line by critiquing the poor behavior of +4's liberals, and despite once being one of the most liberal people on this site, speaking against The Group proved i was secretly always an alt-right plant.
>Okay I'm gonna drop the condescension but that's basically what happened originally, some years ago. Then people acting poorly against me made me criticize them more, which snowballed into uh, this.
Hahaha you are such a lying piece of shit. You have repeatedly defended Alt-Right harassment campaigns, praised MRAs, attacked feminists, shielded /pol/-kun and friends when people called them out for being racist/sexist/etc.

>>410666

Hey, now! I’m more of a blood clot than an intestinal parasite.

>>410666

But for the sake of argument…

>Liberals believe in free speech, ESPECIALLY of their opponents.

As do I. But hey, guess what? That runs both ways. I’m allowed to critique and criticize the speech of others, regardless of whether you like it; that’s a consequence of speaking your mind around and to other people. “Free speech” does not mean “consequence-free speech”, and you’d do well to remember that.

>Liberals are anti-war and believe in good relations with all countries, especially other superpowers like Russia.

You’re thinking of idealistic liberals who want “world peace” and other such pie-in-the-sky hippie horseshit. Pragmatic liberals don’t want war—what they want is for the US military to stop playing World Police.

>Liberals believe in individual liberty, and noninterference from government.

I believe in freedom so long as someone else doesn’t use their freedom in an attempt to curtail my rights. You wanna worship God, Allah, Buddah, or Darth Vader? Go with the Sith, my son. But don't use your religion as an excuse to kick me out of my home or refuse to employ me.

>ally themselves with rich fucks to fuck over the working class

Realistically, I’d like to see some of those rich fucks give up their hoards of wealth to those who actually need it. Whether they do it of their own volition or because the government taxed them all to hell…well, whatever works.

But I’m also aware that those same rich fucks have a lot of economic/political power. And they will do everything possible to avoid giving up that power until they’re in the grave. Short of a “revolution” where we eat the rich (figuratively or literally), they’re not going away any time soon. So I don’t know what you expect anyone to do other than shake their fist at the sky and bitch about Peter Thiel trying to become a literal vampire.

>Since when is the Democratic Party calling for McCarthyist trials to be held?

Haven’t the Republicans promised to immediately impeach Hillary post-Inauguration?

>>410671

>Not if your method of critique is yelling louder so the other guy is drowned out.

Show me where that’s against the law.

>Is this a fucking threat?

No. I don’t make threats. Why would I make a threat if I can just do the thing I’d threaten to do?

>The ONLY consequence for speaking my mind in a free society are being proven wrong and losing the argument.

You can also destroy your reputation by speaking your mind in a way that others deem offensive or insulting. That’s a consequence you forgot about—and it’s one you’d do well to remember, lest you fuck up your reputation further.

>I'm thinking of people who don't want to increase suffering in the world, or get vaporized.

Violence doesn't solve the world’s problems, but sometimes you have to deal with a stubborn son of a bitch who thinks it does. Diplomacy, no matter how good, is not going to win everyone over.

>being employed by whoever i want is a right
>being a twat to my roommates with no consequences is a right
>Incorrect.

Being employed or housed is not a right; being employed or housed without fear of being fired or evicted for certain characteristics—including being LGBT, at least in some states—is a right upheld by government.

>hillary is one of those who needs it
>Incorrect.

Did I say that? Show me where I said that. Show me where I said the Clintons shouldn't be taxed at a higher rate than the average American based on them being the Clintons/politicians/millionaires/whatever.

>the barons (domestic and international)

Whatever globalist conspiracy you think exists: It doesn’t. There is no Illuminati. There is no grand plan amongst the world's leaders to shortchange the average regular jackoff. We are all rudderless.

>The progressive cancer in the Democratic Party is calling for purges of the FBI (because progressives are so fucking retarded they can't conceive of Hillary doing something bad) and are blaming the FBI investigation on VLADIMIR PUTIN.

Considering how Comey acted outside protocol to release a statement about emails that might have already been seen by the FBI in their initial investigation of Clinton—emails that were neither to or from Clinton, in fact—just days before the election, I’m not surprised he’d be at the top of Clinton’s “fire this dumb motherfucker” list. As for the Russian bit…yeah I got nothin’, but let’s not act like Russia’s in the bag for Hillary, okay?

>>410673

>Yeah I think you're fucking threatening me.

Paranoid much? Besides, I don’t have ban powers, and the mods told me not to delete posts in threads I’m active in, so I couldn’t even really do anything to you. Take a pill, then a deep breath.

>DNC leaks suggest otherwise.

And if you actually believe a global cabal of people with their own interests can actually work together to control all the world’s major markets—and would shift the economy into a wealth gap so wide that regular jackoffs won't be able to prop the economy—you have more issues than a Playboy archive.

>Comey acted outside of protocol when he recommended that Clinton not be punished in the first place

Not as far as I know. If anything, the breach of protocol—even if just superficially—was in his sharing the opinion that Clinton acted like a dumbass in re: the emails. Alls he really had to do was just announce that she hadn’t done anything to warrant criminal charges.

And last I heard, the emails being investigated right now were neither to nor from Clinton, and there may even be duplicates of emails already seen by the FBI in its initial investigation, so his reporting this “new” information without knowing what the information was (and doing so days ahead of the election) reeks of Comey trying to put his finger on the electoral scale, even if that wasn’t his actual intent.

>The new email source has 650,000 emails.

How many of those have any relevance to the original investigation, though?

>You're discussing a suspect of a criminal investigation being elected president and then using her new power to crush the policeman and shut down the investigation.... why would she do this if she wasn't guilty?

Comey shat in his own bed with his breaches of protocol; I can’t imagine why Clinton would keep him around after she wins the election, even if he clears her of all charges again. And who says she’s shutting down the investigation? If anything, I’d think her confidence in being cleared of any wrongdoing (i.e., committing any criminal acts) would make her willing to let the investigation go on.

>Russia WAS in the bag for Hillary at the start of the election

Key word: “was”. Now they’re sucking Trump’s shriveled dick.

>The problem is that when the national campaign began she started blaming everything on Russia, which completely fucked up any chance of them ever doing diplomacy with her.

And what would diplomacy with Putin under a Trump administration look like—the two of them all but making out in the Oval Office while Russia bombs the shit out of Ukraine? I'd rather our country have an antagonistic relationship with a hyper-authoritarian asshole like Putin than a buddy-buddy relationship where we let him do whatever he wants so he’ll “play nice” with us.

>>410682

>the elites

Oh, like Donald Trump, the billionaire New York business mogul and entertainer who was born into wealth and used every trick in the book to retain the wealth he earned by stiffing middle-to-lower-class workers and rerouting contributions from his charitable organization back to himself? That kind of “elite”?

>>410683
No, he means (((the elites)))

>>410683
Trump is an elite that broke from the elites, that's why they hate him so much, he's a traitor.

>rerouting contributions from his charitable organization back to himself?
Clinton Foundation in Haiti?

>>410684
Fucking racist.

Panicking /pol/-kun is my favorite version of said poster

>>410685
Trump is hated by the majority of the country and world because he's an idiot and a monster.

>>410686
source pls

>>410688
go easy on the condescending posts, you of all anons haven't earned the right to use them

>>410689
My country (for one) doesn't hate him because he is a monster (?), simply that he's an immature delusional idiot and will have authority over nuclear weapons.

>>410690
>an immature delusional idiot and will have authority over nuclear weapons.
Just out of curiosity, if an immature delusional idiot with nuclear weapons isn't a monster, what is?

We won't even get into all the things he's accused of that would make him a monster even if he doesn't win, like all the sexual assaults, history of abusing SLAPP lawsuits, business scams, potential tax fraud, racism, inciting violence, eroding the foundations of democracy, rape, and most recently, death threats.

>>410690
>go easy on the condescending posts, you of all anons haven't earned the right to use them
I'll mock Alt-Right losers all I want.

>>410691
>Just out of curiosity, if an immature delusional idiot with nuclear weapons isn't a monster, what is?
I wouldn't call someone a monster just because they are scary. But I guess I don't call any person a monster, so it's mainly personal preference of description here, rather than disagreement. I just think "slimy douchebag" is more appropriate.

>>410692
As long as you realize you're twice as bad as they are when you act this childish.

>>410694
No I'm pretty good saying I'm better than the literal neonazis.

>>410694
>twice as bad
This just in: being condescending on the internet makes you twice as bad as people who set black churches on fire and sabotage illegally placed signs so that election workers will injure themselves taking them down according to "Some rando."

>>410696
>>410696
Actually you're twice as bad because you're a classical nazi, not for being "condescending".

>>410700
I like how you're using the word "troll" in place of the more accurate word "criminal."

>>410703
In the United States this sort of thing is considered election fraud--in fact, it's the most commonly prosecuted variant of election fraud. That's why Twitter suspended the account and is assisting law enforcement on tracking down the person responsible. Whoever they are, they're fugitives on the run from justice.

>>410704
And I'll add a citation since I know you're going to point to your out of date infographic up above instead of keeping track of what actually happens:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/twitter-user-suspended-after-tweeting-misleading-voting-info

>>410702
1) no
2) idiots shouldn't vote anyway. win win

>>410707
And yet it sounds like you're planning on voting anyway.

>>410706
Oh, you're denying the overlap of the neonazis with Trump supporters even after the "Jew S A!" and "Lugenpress" things and razor-blades-in-the-Trump-signs trick taken straight out of European neonazis' playbooks?

Two times cartoons predicted the 2016 Trump Campaign:

//youtube.com/watch?v=POB3Dr0uonc

//youtube.com/watch?v=rshem5ejOh8

Wow, /pol/-kun is full on imploding huh? Taking the high court decision and impending Trump loss hard huh buddy?

>>410682
It's hilarious that anybody would think this was anthing but a test of their website that accidentally got published. Just how paranoid one would have to be?

>>410713
No, don't you see, obviously these people are competent enough to juggle a nationwide, bipartisan conspiracy to control election results and impugn an illiterate millionaire-posing-as-a-billionaire, with total domination over most of the media, half of the voters in the country, and all of the government, but they're not competent enough to not upload their website early. What seems far-fetched about that?

Meanwhile, our greatest ongoing humanitarian crisis in North Dakota continues to receive no real action from Washington.

Lol an Ohio judge just slapped the Trump campaign and related organization with a restraining order on poll "watching" activities, eat shit Agent Orange.

So it turns out the FBI is a wing of the RNC, and has been leaking information to the Trump campaign since the beginning. Are we still supposed to pretend the fact they were "investigating" Clinton has any merit when they're so blatantly partisan?

>>410721
Man the housecleaning after this election is going to be legendary.

>>410712
What high court decision?

>>410721
>So it turns out the FBI is a wing of the RNC
Fucking lol, Obama literally chose the guy currently in charge, the GOP fought him every step of the way. The same FBI chief dropped the investigation in the first place, despite there being evidence of Hillarys guilt, simply because Obama asked him to.

You're like a goldfish, your memory lasts a few months max.

The only reason the investigation is reopened is because Comey had no choice. He gave testimony under oath to congress that the emails he received were 100% accounted for, the discovery of new ones meant that he lied under oath, which could potentially have crushed his career if he didn't send a letter to congress and reopen the damn investigation.

Blame Huma for keeping a blackmail file on her pedophile husbands computer.

Like a goldfish you've got no foresight either. How long do you think a Hillary presidency will last with these scandals? If she's elected, she'll do 4 years, and the next 5 presidents will be republican. Goldfish tier imagination as wll... what if Comey hadn't found the emails? What would Huma have done with the blackmail file, with all the dirt she had on Hilldog? Some shady character could literally blackmail and control the POTUS. If this doesn't worry you, it's probably because you're too stupid to feel worried.

>>410727
>How are you not a nazi?
Well I'm not voting for Trump, for starters.

>>410726
>the next 5 presidents will be republican
Ahhh, already the new narrative is being spun. Have fun with your right wing delusion I guess.

>>410726
You don't follow the news that isn't shared on /r/the_donald, I'm guessing. It's been publically revealed that the FBI has been leaking information on Clinton to Trump's campaign and Giulianni even bragged about it. This is not a matter of opinion: the FBI has become politicized and it is supporting Trump, not Clinton.

The other fun part of that is that it proves that Trump is just as much a part of the "Establishment" as any other candidate, contrary to your wet dreams.

Also, >>410727, you're not very informed about the laws of this country. The FBI is not allowed to interfere in partisan elections, and it's not allowed to favor one candidate over the other. Anyone who is publically aiding the Trump campaign in the FBI is breaking the law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act_of_1939

Britain here again. Only one thing happened this week - that High Court ruling.

The reactions from Leave voters and campaigners was even worse than I thought it would be: every right-wing newspaper called the judges )who correctly pointed out that a government can't ignore its own constitution just because it feels like it) "enemies of the people" and immediately demanded they all be fired. All the neo-nazi groups in the UK like Britain First and the EDL are talking about rioting and killing anyone who might block Brexit. I haven't made any of that up.

The government's pretending that nothing's changed, and have outright said that Article 50 will still be triggered mid-March 2017, and that they'll appeal the decision to the British Supreme Court (some wags have pointed out that they could always appeal to the EU's Court of Justice). However, there are rumours of a General Election to be held next Spring, but even then it's entirely possible that May will win that by pandering to racist dipshits. Hell, one Tory MP has resigned, saying that may's turning it into "UKIP-lite".

Really, all it means is that the government will have to discuss their strategy for Brexit with the whole of Parliament... which will be one short conversation, judging by the last couple of months.

>>410733
This is the saddest attempt you've made since trying to pass of fascism as left wing.

>>410744
And what is your plan for when that doesn't happen?

Hilldog just tried to assassinate The Donald.

He's fine, praise Jesus.

Those brave boys at the Secret Service did their jobs.

The flying monkey has been captured.

>>410746
>Hilldog just tried to assassinate The Donald.
bzzzzzzzzzzzt
>RENO — Donald Trump was rushed off stage Saturday night during a campaign rally here as security officials swarmed, but the candidate emerged back on stage after a few minutes and finished his speech.

>The U.S. Secret Service later said in a statement that it took action after “an unidentified individual shouted ‘gun’” in front of the stage. Agents apprehended the person, but found no gun, the statement said, adding that an investigation into the incident continues.

>Trump concluded his rally without further incident.

>>410749
protip, dont post a youtube link without context. No-one's got time for that.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-director-comey-says-agency-wont-recommend-charges-over-clinton-email/2016/11/06/f6276b18-a45e-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html?tid=a_breakingnews&hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar

Wow, it's fucking nothing, WHO COULD HAVE GUESSED?

>>410760

Everyone except Republicans and die-hard Trump supporters.

>>410762

Blargh, my cookies cleared out. That post is mine.

>>410762
>>410763
The very same Trump supporters who tried to pass off the crowd beating a Republicans Against Trump protestor as an assassination attempt yes.

>>410760
He didn't recommend charges the first time, although it's nice to see all of you eating one of your own.

Thanks for the hilarious week long conspiracy theories of FBI being allied with Trump and Putin because he said something that could maybe sorta kina be interpreted as REMOTELY critical of Hillary.

>>410751
You had time to make that post...

>>410770
>Thanks for the hilarious week long conspiracy theories of FBI being allied with Trump and Putin because he said something that could maybe sorta kina be interpreted as REMOTELY critical of Hillary.
He violated the Hatch Act and is still likely to be sacked or prosecuted. Comey is right wing, he's just run afoul of the usual right wing problem with pinning something on the Clintons: there's really nothing to pin.

Please look forward to your loss tomorrow.

The Alt-Right street preaching is really ramping up as the walls come crashing down around them.

>>410770

>although it's nice to see all of you eating one of your own.

Wait, what? Most of the Democrats I know were pissed about Comey’s initial “we found no evidence of wrongdoing” statement for going all “…but Hillary is still a fucking idiot”. If that wasn’t a Hatch violation, it was right on the line, and that’s what got Democrats pissed off at him. When Hillary wins, he’ll be out of a job; the only question is whether he’ll resign or wait to be fired.

>>410773

If you can prove either of the latter two are happening, feel free to post the evidence. Same goes for>>410774 — if you have the evidence necessary to support the charge, you might want to show it.

>>410777

I’ve seen a few pro-Trump ads on YouTube whenever I use the YT app on my phone or tablet. Don’t get pissy because his campaign didn’t spend as much money on digital advertising as Hillary’s did.

I literally saw a trump YT ad this morning. It was arguing against Hillary on the grounds that she wants the Redskins renamed.

>>410777
>Youtube is telling me who to vote fooooor!
>posts ad that clearly labels who paid for said ad

>>410776
>>410771
It was actually two Hatch violations, for protecting Clinton. She lied twice to congress, that's perjury, and punishable by jail, and yet FBI recommended not to pursue. Ergo FBI violated the Hatch act twice in her favor.

>>410777
You know what it's called when government colludes with corporations? Fascism. Gotta make those trains run on time, Mussolini!

>>410781
>You know what it's called when government colludes with corporations?
Literally any government besides communism?

>>410781

>You know what it's called when government colludes with corporations?

Capitalism.

>>410784
>and it's enough to convince me not to vote for the hag
ahahaha yeah because you totally were open to the notion

>>410784
That's not how search engines work.

The dogs of the right are on the run ladies and gentlemen. Vote tomorrow if you haven't already, deliver the killing blow!

>>410784

>Capitalism specifically forbids government interference in economy, you fucking idiot.

Pure capitalism, sure. But America isn’t running on pure capitalism. It’s more capitalism mixed with socialism — what with Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid and public schools all that. In pure capitalism, wouldn’t everything be privatized?

>>410782
>government
>communism
We're talking about economic systems, not political. Communism, socialism and mercantilism all have governments colluding with corps. In the case of communism, the government owns the corps.

Only capitalism avoids this.

>>410785
Maybe if all of y'all did the experiment in June like everyone else, you wouldn't be whinging about Hillary anymore.

>>410788
>It’s more capitalism mixed with socialism — 
(pssst! you're talking about corporatism! which is a decentralized version of socialism!)

And yes, America hasn't been capitalist since the new deal and the war on poverty bullshit. It blows my mind that people think we're capitalist still.

>>410789
>you wouldn't be whinging about Hillary anymore
I'm not, in fact, doing so. I voted for her, because Trump, and you, are unacceptable.

>>410789
>We're talking about economic systems, not political.
You specifically mentioned fascism which is totally political.

>>410789

>Only capitalism avoids this.

Two words shake up your entire argument: Privatized prisons.

>>410792
How does that shake up the argument?

>>410791
That's not me idiot, and fascism is a political system not economic. Look up #9 on this list: https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html

Answering that comment with
>Literally any government besides communism?
Is you being double wrong.

>>410793
>That's not me idiot, and fascism is a political system not economic
Yes, I just said that.
>Is you being double wrong.
That's not me idiot.

>>410776
What level of proof are you looking for?

>>410796

Showing me verifiable evidence reported in multiple sources outside of the Alt-Right Angry Dome would be a hell of a start. If you’re just gonna link to a Breitbart column with a clickbait headline or some YouTube video with an attention-grabbing thumbnail, don’t waste your time or mine.

Scott Adam's attempts to not look like he leaned toward Trump from the start instead of merely predicting him are getting very silly.
>http://blog.dilbert.com/post/152734465316/unhypnotizing-a-clinton-supporter
Aside from "unhypnotizing" being a concept he never promoted at any point, and the fact that his entire coverage of the election fits his own description of persuasion as described in his series on persuasion including his coverage of the election perefectly (even the fact that he's describing how he tries to persuade people was itself mentioned as a persuasion technique), I'll go ahead and refute the first entry on his lsit of reasons to trust Trump:

>Trump’s Tough Talk Inspires violence: Ask Clinton supporters if they have seen the Project Veritas video of Clinton operatives talking about paying people to incite violence at Trump rallies. The people on the video have been fired, and we haven’t seen violence at Trump rallies since.
I would think that if Clinton supported the actions of people inciting vioence, she either wouldn't punish them or would have someone in place to continue inciting such violence after the initial perpetrators are fired. It seems that she hasn't, meanwhile Trump has made no indication of firing himself from his own campaign despite being directly responsible for his own words.

>>410801
If project Veritas tells you the sky is blue, you can safely assume it has turned red. It's run by James O'Keefe, the notorious compulsive liar and fraud who had never released a video he hasn't edited to say something defamatory in his entire career.

>>410810
You've been previously informed that posting this kind of thing is literally illegal.

Regardless of who wins, the shitstorm will be imminent.

Mark my anonymous words.

>>410812
Uh huh.

>>410812
That is bullshit.

>>410814
Going to grab your musket?

>>410821

For what, a user-generated electoral map that has no bearing on the actual election results and is little more than your personal fantasy?

>>410823

>your only chance is vote rigging

And here I thought the Republicans were the ones that gerrymandered state districts, gutted the Voting Rights Act, and exploited said VRA-gutting by immediately passing new laws that make access to voting harder for minorities and the poor.

>>410824
None of his delusional fantasies will save Agent Orange.

>>410823
Is this for real?

>>410826

Probably. Voting machines are not the most reliable technology in terms of properly functioning 100% of the time. At least we still have paper ballots.

>>410828
They do, it's just that Trump's little band of morons are the only ones who are stupid enough to think that an error you can see when you go to vote is more likely to be "tampering" than "a shitty machine." The adults in the room realize that actual tampering wouldn't be visible until votes were tabulated, so they just ask for a paper ballot.

>>410829
>the only ones
Are you including the voting machine programmer who testified they're easy to rig and HAVE been rigged in the past?

>>410828
>FIRST REPUBLICAN SINCE REAGAN TO DO SO
I was just talking the other day about how there's a lot of similarities between the two.
Like, not in a good way tho.

>>410830
I'm sure they've been rigged. I'm also sure that if anyone was going to actually try to steal the election that way they would do it in a way that would make it so people couldn't tell that their vote was counted wrong. You're an idiot if you think a voting machine that's rigged, rather than malfunctioning, is going to tell you who it's going to report you voted for.

Meanwhile, in California:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-azusa-shooting-injuries-20161108-story.html

>manipulate polls so that opponent is ahead
>use this to encourage lazy people to vote, or else opponent will be elected
>???
>profit

I reckon it would work. Like a reverse Brexit.

>>410833
Do you think that because I don't support Trump, I do support Clinton?