/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Due to the recent cyberattacks on 4chan, the boards are currently on Red Alert.
Stay vigilant.

Thread stats: 306 posts, 104 files (97 image(s), 7 video(s))

Replying to /co/438701
Options
No.438701
The SimpsooooooonsAnonymous
Image:163190425529.jpg(411kB, 800x1200)SF1.jpg
I'm feeling nostalgic, let's have a Simpsons thread.
It can be for anything, just wanna post funny bullshit related to the series? Want to wax lyrical over the good old days when you loved it? Want to bitch over how fucking terrible it is now as a lumbering zombie of a series? Go nuts!

Gonna storytime this fan comic as a starter, cuz its not bad at all.
No.438702
Anonymous
Replies:>>438703
Image:163190426794.jpg(813kB, 800x1200)SF2.jpg
>>438701
No.438703
Anonymous
Replies:>>438704
Image:163190434423.jpg(832kB, 800x1200)SF3.jpg
>>438702
In alot of places the writing feels much like the official Simpsons comics in terms of humour.
No.438704
Anonymous
Replies:>>438705
Image:163190443510.jpg(775kB, 800x1200)SF4.jpg
>>438703
No.438705
Anonymous
Replies:>>438706
Image:163190448304.jpg(862kB, 800x1200)SF5.jpg
>>438704
Its a fighting tournament, so of course here comes the anime
No.438706
Anonymous
Replies:>>438707
Image:163190458225.jpg(833kB, 800x1200)SF6.jpg
>>438705
>MEL-KUN! YAMATE!
No.438707
Anonymous
Replies:>>438708
Image:163190460932.jpg(846kB, 800x1200)SF7.jpg
>>438706
No.438708
Anonymous
Replies:>>438709
Image:163190468461.jpg(744kB, 800x1200)SF8.jpg
>>438707
It wouldn't be anime, or Simpsons, without some hard hitting family drama
No.438709
Anonymous
Replies:>>438710
Image:163190478358.jpg(729kB, 800x1200)SF9.jpg
>>438708
Seriously for a retard Homer has done alot with his life.
And since the creator was clearly a fan of the show there's alot of callbacks sprinkled across this comic, as you have well seen up to this point.
No.438710
Anonymous
Replies:>>438711
Image:163190481223.jpg(803kB, 800x1200)SF10.jpg
>>438709
No.438711
Anonymous
Replies:>>438712
Image:163190483437.jpg(699kB, 800x1200)SF11.jpg
>>438710
>DUN DUN DUN!
No.438712
Anonymous
Replies:>>438713
Image:163190485638.jpg(749kB, 800x1200)SF12.jpg
>>438711
There's that anime again
No.438713
Anonymous
Replies:>>438714
Image:163190488039.jpg(809kB, 800x1200)SF13.jpg
>>438712
No.438714
Anonymous
Replies:>>438715
Image:163190489904.jpg(747kB, 800x1200)SF14.jpg
>>438713
No.438715
Anonymous
Replies:>>438716
Image:163190494629.jpg(831kB, 800x1200)SF15.jpg
>>438714
More callbacks abound
No.438716
Anonymous
Image:163190500606.jpg(246kB, 800x1200)SF16.jpg
>>438715
HERE IT COMES! THE ULTIMATE TECHNIQUE!
No.438717
Anonymous
Image:163190508404.jpg(778kB, 800x1200)SF17.jpg
>>438716
oh no, throttling the life out of my small child whenever I get pissed off is actually pretty fucked up
No.438718
Anonymous
Replies:>>438719
Image:163190510045.jpg(263kB, 800x1200)SF18.jpg
>>438717
No.438719
Anonymous
Replies:>>438720
Image:163190511534.jpg(856kB, 800x1200)SF19.jpg
>>438718
No.438720
Anonymous
Image:163190521067.jpg(261kB, 800x1200)SF20.jpg
>>438719
And the heartwarming finish~
No.438721
Anonymous
Here's the source link while I'm at it.
https://twitter.com/joechoui/status/1436030573559046149

Get to posting, don't make my sweat and sacrifice in creating this thread all be for naught.
No.438724
Anonymous
oh yeah, I saw this on twitter before. It's a really nice comic.

Les Kassos just did a Simpsons episode right now, but I'm not sure if it's funny, other than highlighting how dysfunctional the Simpsons are.
Les Simplon - Les Kassos #74youtube thumb
No.438725
Anonymous
>>438724
Jesus that's fucked up. Those wacky Frogs.
No.438728
Mister Twister
Replies:>>438755
>>438724
Did it say anything about how Lisa became an insufferable know-it-all who the writers always give the viewpoint they themselves consider correct?
No.438729
Anonymous
Image:163198486291.png(671kB, 1437x1124)bart attack.png
Blue or Red shirt
No.438739
Anonymous
Image:163209290882.jpg(43kB, 541x960)Spoiler image
No.438755
Anonymous
>>438728
Why bring all this up when she wasn't even in the sketch?
Seems pretty obsessed.
No.438768
Anonymous
Replies:>>445658
Image:163272701242.jpg(354kB, 879x1317)1632726687384.jpg
No.438875
Anonymous
What even fucking season are they up to by now, haven't watched an episode of the simpsons in yonks since I don't watch teevee.
>The series is currently in its 32nd broadcast season, and has already been renewed for two more.
For fucks sake!
No.438882
Anonymous
>>438875
Simpsons has been going on for 32 fucking years.
god damn.
No.438884
Mister Twister
>>438882
Zombies don't count.
No.438886
Anonymous
Image:163455056969.jpg(217kB, 1594x892)90s kid.jpg
>>438875
>>438882
No.439050
Anonymous
Replies:>>439051
Image:163643330285.jpg(215kB, 1242x910)1.jpg
No.439051
Anonymous
Image:163643331430.jpg(161kB, 1242x866)2.jpg
>>439050
No.439319
Anonymous
Video:163827127377.webm(6MB / 0:03:10 / vp8, 480x360)Black Springfield.webm
prepare for unforeseen consequences
No.439323
Anonymous
Replies:>>439335
>>439322
The whole "Don't take the money you're owed just because it comes from a Bad Guy" cliche is so bloody stupid.

By taking the money you're at least draining it away from their resources, and if you really want to show off how moral you are why not spend/donate that money towards aiding a worthwhile cause rather than on yourself.

Its just egotistical showboating and pointless to the point of being counterproductive as a Good person.
No.439328
Swift
Image:163829088262.png(1.30MB, 1920x1080)Képernyőfelvétel (82894).png
LOL. That's where he got all his parenting ideas from
No.439335
Mstr Twstr
>>439323
It is okay to take money from "bad" people, if you're PlayTonic.
No.439350
Anonymous
>>439349
I never minded Principal and the Pauper.

Certainly was way less dumb than some of the plot or 'lore' twists that came later.
No.439473
Anonymous
Image:163942006376.png(153kB, 1016x1530)hb.png
No.439486
Anonymous
Image:163955751058.jpg(252kB, 900x1436)0421462607271.jpg
>>438701
No.439558
Anonymous
It occurs to me that both Marge and Homer have cheated on each other (not talking about the near affairs with Jacques & Mindy)
Homer probably fucked his Vegas wife while drunk, Marge engaged in efficient-German-sex with the Homer impersonating replacement with the heavy accent in the episode that was a cheap parody of The Prisoner.
No.439674
Anonymous
Image:164084807882.jpg(1.31MB, 4960x7429)Its not stealing in the engine if you lift an object and carry it out of their sight without adding it to your inventory.jpg
These images are an entire thing online, fusing Fallout with the Simpsons.
No.439988
Anonymous
Replies:>>473603
Image:164410159796.jpg(192kB, 1920x1080)1644086888931.jpg
>>438875
>>438886
For fucks sake to the extreme.
No.440086
Anonymous
No.440366
Anonymous
Image:164555876836.png(872kB, 714x890)554.png
No.440372
Anonymous
>>440086
How about some Lego steamed ham?
Steamed Hams but it's in LEGOyoutube thumb
No.440450
Anonymous
Replies:>>440457
So why has Steamed Hams seemingly become the #1 most popular Simpsons moment out of all of them?
No.440452
Anonymous
No.440457
Deon
>>440450
Absurdity and Banality go together like caramel and salt.
The banality of the outdated boss over for dinner sitcom plot combined with the absurdity of Skinner's denials pumped up to 11 combine to make a masterpiece.
Skinner straight up gets out of a tight spot by resetting the conversation by exiting the room an immediately coming back in.
No.440513
Anonymous
Replies:>>440514
Image:164709081401.jpg(559kB, 1733x2596)1647048769415.jpg
There's alot of these kind of simpsons images out there but I particularly like this one.
No.440514
Deon
Image:164711993011.gif(1.96MB, 480x360)D10472BC-749B-43D0-BC6C-FE2BEF704F2F.gif
>>440513
No.440531
Anonymous
Image:164724847928.jpg(163kB, 729x1946)1647223364668.jpg
No.440588
Anonymous
Image:164765652907.jpg(123kB, 1240x832)Crank Simpsons.jpg
No.440602
Anonymous
Image:164776033766.jpg(133kB, 828x1241)rollin.jpg
This hurts my soul.
No.441107
Anonymous
Image:164921249164.jpg(67kB, 500x754)haha.jpg
>>440602
No.441149
Anonymous
Replies:>>441179
Is there anything at all that people still LIKE about the Simpsons?
No.441178
Anonymous
Image:164955126087.jpg(576kB, 1616x1050)retired.jpg
>>441174
No.441179
Mstr Twstr
No.441228
Anonymous
Image:164994885724.jpg(221kB, 1046x1950)6436465.jpg
>>440602
No.441284
Swift
Replies:>>441285
>>441218
What the fuuuuu....
Was that some reference to some fighting game?
No.441285
Anonymous
>>441284
Shin Megami Tensei V
No.441398
Anonymous
Image:165125739769.jpg(165kB, 1242x1853)Lisa is a bitch.jpg
No.441450
Anonymous
Image:165154087329.png(1.94MB, 600x2242)65622626.png
No.441534
Anonymous
Image:165246220403.jpg(164kB, 1304x1747)11.jpg
No.441691
Anonymous
Image:165378473781.jpg(299kB, 1145x1131)4324.jpg
No.441699
Anonymous
Replies:>>443292
Image:165389021441.jpg(83kB, 1079x660)oh those wacky springfield police.jpg
No.441751
Anonymous
Image:165434691911.png(765kB, 975x600)324.png
No.442422
Anonymous
Image:165526904900.jpg(180kB, 1280x960)Arminposting.jpg
No.443292
Anonymous
>>441699
The fact Chief Wiggum bloodily ground up two youths who were spraypainting a wall into burger meat with a giganto turbine-powered jetpack in a non-treehouse of horror episode is messed up.
No.443329
Anonymous
Video:165705434909.webm(3.07MB / 0:00:22 / vp8, 1920x1080)1656431226032.webm
No.443331
Anonymous
Video:165705832614.webm(780kB / 0:00:12 / vp8, 512x384)mighty faggot.webm
haha

the changing meaning of words over the passage of time and the human usage of them
No.443368
Anonymous
Video:165714771249.webm(1.20MB / 0:00:10 / vp8, 624x480)65747.webm
No.443795
Anonymous
Replies:>>443805
This is interesting.
Someone is putting a ridiculous amount of work into remastering that old Simpsons Hit & Run videogame.
The Simpsons Hit And Run REMASTERED MOD And Its Cutscenes 2youtube thumb
No.443805
Mstr Twstr
>>443795
Did not know, highly impressed. I always thought the in-game character models looked MEH due to time constraints and the dev team not being the best at designing something that looks good and moves good while not having too many polygons.
No.444525
Anonymous
Image:166071814428.png(375kB, 640x480)Justin Trudeau Brown Face.png
O Canada - Anthem by "Céline Dion" (South Park)youtube thumb
No.444571
Anonymous
Image:166095119451.jpg(279kB, 1198x1686)Spoiler image
>>440086
This one is pretty good.
No.444845
Anonymous
Image:166176754180.gif(3.27MB, 458x354)DANCE DANCE DANCE DANCE.gif
No.444862
Anonymous
Image:166179885505.gif(3.05MB, 520x390)disturbing attraction to butterfinger.gif
When was the last time you saw the Simpsons being used to sell products?
No.445290
Anonymous
Replies:>>445481
Image:166241801619.png(3.30MB, 1524x4913)the memes jack.png
Mankind's capacity for evolution is terrifying...
No.445481
Meester Tweester
>>445290
Mankind's ability to survive is astonishing. His inability to heal is tragic.
No.445487
Anonymous
Image:166291870085.png(1.28MB, 1440x1337)1662916863875927.png
No.445547
Anonymous
Image:166318798379.jpg(441kB, 2000x2000)No Truce With The Simpsons.jpg
No.445643
Anonymous
Video:166360074122.webm(1.66MB / 0:00:14 / vp8, 932x720)1662678639183834.webm
>>441218
No.445658
Anonymous
Image:166373393180.gif(1.05MB, 480x384)1663729626031245.gif
>>438768
No.446073
Anonymous
Replies:>>446132
Image:166533984662.jpg(1.14MB, 2867x4096)waterworld.jpg
Hey guys you remember WaterWorld?
https://macaw45.itch.io/kevin-costners-waterworld

It's BACK! In fangame form.
No.446115
Anonymous
Video:166549619805.webm(1.18MB / 0:00:15 / vp8, 640x360)1665444699216960.webm
No.446132
Anonymous
Replies:>>446141
>>446073
>Hey guys you remember WaterWorld?
yeah, and I need to re-watch it now that the Ulysses cut is out.
No.446141
Meester Tweester
Replies:>>446147
>>446132
There is a new cut of WaterWorld out? Is this for real??
No.446147
Anonymous
Replies:>>446179
>>446141
Are you a big fan of the movie Tweester..?
No.446179
Meester Tweester
>>446147
No, just saw it once and thought nothing about it was "bad".
No.446221
Anonymous
No.446318
Anonymous
Image:166657918876.jpg(446kB, 592x1400)waxy ass.jpg
The humorous edits of existing scenes people make are the only worthwhile part of Simpsons left
No.446339
Anonymous
Replies:>>446388
Image:166678631108.jpg(221kB, 2048x1152)Ff7qRSVWQAAqjj2.jpg
No.446437
Anonymous
Image:166781890366.jpg(96kB, 640x960)upset.jpg
No.446564
Anonymous
Image:166833299870.jpg(111kB, 904x711)gas.jpg
No.446656
Anonymous
Image:166955472732.jpg(80kB, 632x1023)1669529978135769.jpg
Was the Simpsons Arcade beat-em-up as great as I remember or is that just the power of nostalgia?
No.446953
Anonymous
Image:167122387656.jpg(185kB, 900x960)Spirit Borealis.jpg
This variant on the joke is pretty good I think
No.447155
Anonymous
Replies:>>447290
Has there been some pushback going around in recent times about the removal of Apu from the Simpsons?

Don't know the details specifically, just heard about it in passing.
Like its actual Indian people that want him back who aren't the kind of brats that want to get rid of characters such as Apu or Speedy Gonzales for being 'stereotypical'?
No.447290
Anonymous
Replies:>>447341
>>447155
The guy who rose a stink about it in the first place claims that he didn't actually want them to remove him from the show; just change him to be less stereotypical. Most people just chalked it up as another reason not to watch the Simpsons. I think most Indians never gave a shit about him. He wasn't like how Speedy Gonzales is to Mexicans; he was very specifically an 80s joke that no one really cared about.
No.447341
Anonymous
>>447290
>He wasn't like how Speedy Gonzales is to Mexicans
Speaking of-
The New Speedy Gonzales | Gabriel Iglesiasyoutube thumb
No.447391
Anonymous
Image:167456093967.jpg(465kB, 1280x1024)Simpsons Twisted Metal.jpg
No.448089
Anonymous
Replies:>>448377
Image:167868304954.jpg(912kB, 1200x1800)cggukkovqcna1.jpg
God Dammit
No.448377
Swift
Replies:>>448386
>>448089
What episode was this in?
No.448386
Mister Twister
Replies:>>448438
>>448377
This is so obviously a shoop.
No.448438
Anonymous
>>448386
Hey now, don't go destroying a poor pokefuckers dreams.
No.448440
Anonymous
Image:168054368216.jpg(65kB, 639x960)Steamed Chungus.jpg
No.448776
Anonymous
Image:168247088505.jpg(249kB, 1280x1927)pcqgnlhww4wa1.jpg
Remember the episode with homer's car being impounded at the world trade centre?
No.449880
Anonymous
Image:168761681242.gif(1.35MB, 498x367)wattba.gif
No.450074
Anonymous
Image:168875119330.jpg(150kB, 917x1378)perfect.jpg
No.450939
Anonymous
Image:169342790793.png(1.22MB, 2039x2894)sweetsimpsons.png
No.451011
Anonymous
Wolfcastle was one of the more amusing parodies in the Simpsons.
When you make a 10 strength and 10 intellect character in Falloutyoutube thumb

It was weird when they actually used Ahnold in the movie instead of him.
No.451066
Anonymous
Steamed Hams but it was banned in the USSRyoutube thumb
This is one fancy take on it.
No.451094
Anonymous
Image:169443834215.jpg(64kB, 750x914)cry.jpg
No.451355
Anonymous
Image:169560339393.png(1.83MB, 1372x2048)9087.png
No.451393
Anonymous
Replies:>>451937
No.452279
Anonymous
Image:169706994026.gif(43kB, 151x269)got the.gif
No.454891
Anonymous
Image:169895259279.jpg(238kB, 1019x2241)tude.jpg
Pretty old joke.
No.455626
Anonymous
Replies:>>455627
Image:169951871521.jpg(186kB, 1280x1024)damn kids ruining my interwebs.jpg
No.455627
Mister Twister
>>455626
I member demotivational posters...
No.456139
Anonymous
Replies:>>456157
Image:170005552915.jpg(119kB, 1280x720)mr burns is helping me find my gun.jpg
Simpsons itself is garbage but all the jokes and edits spunoff it by the internet are hilarious
No.456157
Mister Twister
>>456139
Do not conflate Zombie Simpsons with pre-2000 Simpsons.
No.457134
Anonymous
Replies:>>457955
>>456299
Why is Dagoth so memeworthy?
No.458211
Anonymous
Image:170322056592.jpg(569kB, 706x1080)rsmb2.jpg
Okay, now this is a pretty good one.
No.458665
Anonymous
Image:170382075357.png(660kB, 800x808)Seymour Adventure.png
Something for all the Sonicfags to appreciate.
No.459010
Anonymous
Replies:>>459476
No.459172
Anonymous
Image:170454216474.jpg(759kB, 2000x2589)1704488524564841.jpg
>>438716
>>438717
No.461401
Anonymous
Video:170779142754.mp4(152kB / 0:00:01 / avc1, 1000x700)seed training.mp4
>>447278
No.462105
Anonymous
Image:170881994869.jpg(223kB, 800x800)ashish-rana-book-club.jpg
No.462106
Anonymous
Image:170882007207.jpg(47kB, 400x400)ashish-rana-number-4-2.jpg
No.462533
Anonymous
Image:170954040254.png(1.23MB, 2297x3217)8567.png
Homer seems pretty Orange.
No.464385
Anonymous
Image:171279003767.jpg(73kB, 841x960)aavv1u5ihktc1.jpeg
No.464568
Anonymous
Image:171364627162.jpg(180kB, 1370x2048)NESmen.jpg
I like this one
No.467633
Anonymous
No.472454
Anonymous
Image:172013945838.jpg(346kB, 1536x864)Flatlander Woman.jpg
Not really worth starting a new Image Humor thread on /cog/ for one picture.
No.472675
Anonymous
Image:172664733227.png(927kB, 949x789)433246324.png
No.472812
Anonymous
No.472883
Anonymous
Replies:>>473206
Image:173359828506.jpg(82kB, 640x959)Imagine if the Simpsons could actually be this topical.jpg
No.473206
Anonymous
Image:173553359579.png(66kB, 168x189)9b55ff3f9e66c52e91e1cc5f1d07cc7774463ae265ea5410954968e05d16dd08.png
>>472883
No.473525
Anonymous
Image:174281294590.jpg(112kB, 640x960)Breasts Hentai.jpg
You could hardly even pay me to watch episodes of the simpsons but the jokes made with screenshots from the show still hit the funny bone.
No.473603
Anonymous
No.473805
Anonymous
Image:174474423296.png(182kB, 533x895)1533030967155.png
No.473892
Anonymous
So Homer totally did fuck Mindy and just pretended it was Marge, right?
No.474178
Anonymous
Image:174475289097.jpg(42kB, 640x480)7668876767877.jpg
>As Roger Meyers Jr., the owner of the park I'd like to thank you for stopping the killer robots, and to show my appreciation, here are two free passes.
>But there are five of us.
>Here are _two_ free passes.
No.474180
Anonymous
Sneed
No.474222
Anonymous
Replies:>>474223
Lisa is built for BMC (Big Milhouse Cock)
No.474223
Anonymous
>>474222
>t. Milhouse
No.474236
Anonymous
Milhouse would be like 3 inches hard lol.
No.474314
Anonymous
Replies:>>474729
Image:174475710360.jpg(32kB, 640x480)4443.jpg
>You know that dead body they found behind the mayor's house?
>Jimbo killed him!?
>No. But he poked him with a stick.
No.474712
Anonymous
Image:174481146025.jpg(45kB, 640x480)hqdefault.jpg
>No offense, Homer, but your half-assed underparenting was a lot more fun than your half-assed overparenting.
>But I'm using my whole ass.
No.474721
Anonymous
Is this just some sort of bot spamming random screenshots and greentexted lines from episode scripts?
No.474729
Anonymous
>>474314
Now kiss.
No.474758
Anonymous
Al Jean had sent the NoHomers admit the following email back around 2004:

"As you well know, Mr. Shearer has been vocal in his criticism of the show's quality in recent years. Thus, I am forwarding you this email and would like you to repost it in my name.

Our show has won every award it could possibly get in the past year. Dan Castallaneta received an Emmy for his performance in Today I Am A Clown. All this was made possible thanks to people who worked much harder than Mr. Shearer. He complains about his gradually-reduced roles in the show. Whenever I schedule a Thursday afternoon table read, I can never be sure that he will show up. Many times I've been told that he wasn't coming. Therefore I've made sure not to give him too much to do in any given episode.

Mr. Shearer has told me that he's upset with the show's current state and he was happier in Season 4. Well, I ran Seasons 3 and 4 along with Mike Reiss and I don't remember him being very happy back then. In particular, I remember him strongly objecting to Homer At The Bat, an episode that is now regarded as a classic.

In addition, Mr. Shearer has said that he feels cheated by the show financially. He is set to make just shy of 5.5 million dollars this year for what can generously be described as a few hours of work a week. When I consider how much our firefighters and teachers make, this attitude makes me want to vomit.

-- Al Jean"
No.474762
Anonymous
>blah blah blah teachers and firefighters blah blah blah look at all the cool awards we got
Not an argument, Al.
No.474764
Anonymous
>>474762
>>474758
I love the part where he thinks awards are proof of quality instead of industry people giving them to their friends.
No.474766
Anonymous
afaik Shearer stopped actually coming into the studio and just recorded his lines from home at some point in the early 2000s
No.474826
Anonymous
>>474758
>>474762
I've often heard the term "Jeanisms" within his episodes, and while I think I have an idea of what that means, I need more explanation to what that means.

So the question is what to you, are what makes a Jean episode, a Jean episode, and therefore, a godawful or bad episode (or good episode)?
No.474829
Anonymous
>>474826
>having to explain the joke to the audience
>jokes around Homer's grotesque appetite
>bad visual gags, usually related to body humor as well (cf. Smart and Smarter)
>rushed story development
No.474831
Anonymous
>>474826
To me it's mostly forcing celebrities to play themselves without adding anything meaningful to the episode. Another aspect would be nonstop "Marge and Homer have a fight" plots . And characters often being reduced to their most obvious character trait only makes it worse (Bart - prankster, Lisa - smart adult in a kid's body, Marge - mum, Homer - dumb, fat alcoholic).
No.474840
Anonymous
>>474826
Including all of the following:

>celebrity appearances that do nothing but dick suck the guest star ala Lady Gaga
>explaining the joke to the audience as anon said above
>overly long couch or blackboard gags
>marriage crisis episodes (are 3-4 of those per season really necessary?)
>B plots that are inserted for no reason. If the episode is about the adults, the subplot is about the kids, and vice versa--often they don't intersect and only exist to fill time or give Bart and Lisa something to do
>Flanderizing characters
No.474848
Anonymous
Replies:>>474850
>>474840
And also:

>Refusal to think outside the box. There’s a lot of reports that Jean likes to shoot down any episode pitch that deviates too far from his personal vision of how the show should work, choosing instead to go for the same kind of episode every single time. This has led to entire seasons of his work feeling samey, making them all feel like this unified blob of gray mush aside from the occasional standout.
No.474850
Anonymous
>>474848
i sometimes think he gets inspiration from ZAZ movies (Airplane, Naked Gun etc) which would be fine if the episodes didn't pretend they want to tell a story, but yet again they try to have a plot/stakes which often completely doesn't work for the same reason.
No.474852
Anonymous
>>474850
not sure I agree here, there were definitely ''outside the box'' episodes under Jean (Seemingly never-ending story, 24 minutes, The man who came to be dinner etc.) especially around the movie, just not that much in regards of his whole career.
No.474854
Anonymous
>>474850
>i sometimes think he gets inspiration from ZAZ movies (Airplane, Naked Gun etc) which would be fine if the episodes didn't pretend they want to tell a story, but yet again they try to have a plot/stakes which often completely doesn't work for the same reason.
^this x100 but the hilarious part is that none of his comedy is ever worth it to make this structure feel needed. He wants to be Airplane but all he gets is a boomer's Facebook feed minus the AI.
No.474857
Anonymous
>>474762
that sure sounds like a boomer's facebook posting alright
No.474860
Anonymous
I think he just has a box where he’s most comfortable. It seems weird for such a longstanding writer to have a comfort zone, but he definitely seems to have one perhaps out of a sense of pride. Usually, he dismisses criticism for his work with the excuse that the show still earns Emmys. Obviously that means everything is fine and we don’t need to change anything. So not only does he stay within his comfort zone and rarely leave, he comes up with any cope and excuse to stay there.
No.474862
Anonymous
Replies:>>475082
>>474840
regarding marriage crisis plots: Homer and Marge are a couple, they surely love each other, this has been shown many times over the series but in Jean episodes their idyll must be interrupted by anything else. Because in his view in reality couples can't live in calm or have mutual understanding - true love is too ideal to be implemented, even in a cartoon.
No.474868
Anonymous
>>474840
Dare I say Jean always kind of had problems structuring episodes as far back as the classic seasons as well as getting enough material to fill 22 minutes. This was somewhat apparently in Seasons 3-4 when you had stuff like Sideshow Bob stepping on rakes to pad out the run time (the writers also admitted that Itchy & Scratchy episodes were often used to burn time).
No.474871
Anonymous
Image:174482680032.jpg(62kB, 640x637)bnz3.jpg
>>474868
The limitations of Jean's showrunning abilities with story length, pacing and whatnot did show a bit back then in the classic era such as with some of the Jean & Reiss episodes which you stated with your examples: The last third of Season 4 I think had some elements that were early indicators of the fallacies of his showrunning such as a bit wonky/thin writing and bit of padding such as extra jokes or extensions. The jokes and gags were still usually really funny and made up for the shortcomings, but I think many do not see that even then there were some slight problems (I am aware that both Jean & Reiss were the showrunners back then and for the most part things worked out, but I don't think Jean is excempt for blame with things like structuring problems).

When Jean took over full time, it started to become all the more apparent with more noticeable instances of episodes that didn't quite work in terms of showrunning and things getting more egregious in the HD episodes, especially as Jean really started to get long in the tooth with more of the limitations of his showrunning becoming all the more apparent with each passing year.
No.474879
Anonymous
Replies:>>474904
>>474871
>>474868
depending on who you ask he and Mike Reiss were responsible for the golden age of the show.

>but Season 4 felt off-kilter towards the end
that's rather easily understandable because the staff were extremely tired by that point. most of the OG writers left after the 8Fxx episodes were done and showrunners could only stand two seasons before they'd had enough. i'm sure Mike Reiss never wanted to come back again for that reason. Cape Feare was 100% the result of a totally tapped out staff who knew they would be leaving the show anyway.
No.474904
Anonymous
>>474871
>>474879
anyone who has their doubts about Al Jean need only check out his DVD commentaries, interviews, and Twitter posts to realize that he always played second fiddle to Mike Reiss and really should not have been made solo showrunner.

>Reiss is a naturally funny guy, still is--check out his book Springfield Confidential
>hearing Jean talk about the show you always get the impression that he wanted it to be like Family Guy with cynical characters that are always at each other's throats
>i'm sure he'd do a plot where Homer gets drunk and molests Lisa if he could get away with it on network TV
>in most of the DVD commentaries while the rest of the staff are like "aw, this scene is so heartwarming" or "you can feel Bart's pain" Al is like yeah Homer is a dick nobody should be like him or Bart was a real cunt for what he did to Mrs. Krabapple in Bart The Lover

tl;dr he seems to get off on the idea of characters who want to kill each other most of the time and it goes a long way to explaining why the show turned out the way it did after he took over in Season 13
No.474907
Anonymous
Replies:>>474910
>>474904
I never explored the DVD commentaries much so I guess I missed out on a lot of insight there, or lack of it on Jean's end. But it does fit with how he was on Twitter. It always seemed like he was disinterested compared to some of the other staff, at least the ones that used Twitter. Though it's probably fair to say he liked Lisa, since she was almost the only one actually presented positively even if she really wasn't acting good in context a lot of the time.

Though the assessment of Homer not being likeable wouldn't be entirely wrong. In many ways he is not a good person at all. But the thing that still makes him click is not "we shouldn't act like Homer" but because most of us do act like him from time to time. He's absolutely a jerk to Flanders but many people have that one guy who just rubs them the wrong way even if everyone else loves 'em. People can be petty, impulsive, thoughtless and even volatile and in a way it makes Homer very relatable. He can make people laugh at the parts of themselves that suck.
No.474910
Anonymous
Replies:>>475016
>>474904
>>474907
i wouldn't say Jean was without his positives but you do get the impression he doesn't really "get" the characters a lot of the time
No.474919
Anonymous
Replies:>>475776
>>474904
It does seem he needed Reiss as a foil. Once he proved he could function as a solo writer during the Scully era he became a valuable asset to the show and there was really a lack of other viable options to succeeed Mike Scully and they thought he had showrunning experience and was very organized and disciplined.

Jean's particular takes on the characters became increasingly apparent including continuing asshole Homer from the Scully seasons (framing Marge for DUI is still in the top 5 worst things Homer has ever done). He never liked Bart very much so Bart became increasingly irrelevant as time went on. Lisa of course was his perfect daughterfu who can do no wrong. Marge is the totally helpless victim of Homer's douchebaggery.
No.474961
Anonymous
fuck Al Jean though
No.475001
Anonymous
Having seen a fair amount of Season 13-16, their biggest sin if anything is being...functional. They rarely do anything grossly wrong, but while Scully tends to have the feeling of a show unable to figure out what it wants to be, Jean is 100% content in doing absolutely the bare minimum of anything creatively. Most of his stories are so automatic that they barely even register as actual stories, the only really change they register is how increasingly sloppy his basic construction becomes as time passes.
No.475016
Anonymous
>>474910
The Jean era turned to absolute garbage during season 17 and then it somehow managed to sink lower than that around season 21.
No.475038
Anonymous
Replies:>>475122
The Simpsons in the classic seasons worked because they had relatively regular turnovers of the show's staff. Oakley and Weinstein had threatened to leave the show if they didn't get to be made showrunners. They happened to think Season 2 was the show's peak and wanted to recreate that with their own twist on things. Like the previous showrunners they got tired out after two seasons and quit.

Easy as it is to shit on Mike Scully, it makes sense why he became showrunner. He'd been there since Season 5 and John Swartzwelder and George Meyer had no interest in the job. Again if Scully had only stayed two seasons like his predecessors it might have been ok but he was afraid to step down because he thought the show would be ending soon and he wanted the credit for being the last showrunner. Scully also got it to the point where the writers were a lot lazier than before, they'd put in a few hours a week instead of staying up all night reworking scripts like they formerly did. I would guess Jean made things even lazier.

I mean any institution needs new people once in a while; twenty years of the same guy running things leads to stagnation.
No.475075
Anonymous
Oakley and Weinstein began the decline of the Simpsons; Season 8 was a minor step down in quality at the time, and the infamous The Principal and the Pauper aired at the end of their time as showrunners. However, Mike Scully perpetuated the show's downfall and is far more to blame for changing the series from a provocative comedy to just a commercialized sitcom.
No.475082
Anonymous
Replies:>>475106
>>474862
I will say that I definitely don't think the marriage crisis stories as a concept is bad per se but it's just that the immense overexposure to it in the post classic era by Al Jean (who is obsessed with this type of premise, it seems) has actively done a lot of damage to the premise and tarred its reputation by loads of uninspired, if not forced, marriage crisis plots, many of which feel poorly written and at worst turns Marge into kind of a monster when Homer hasn't really done anything to deserve it and sometimes being assumed to be the bad guy, but this we have discussed in other threads so I won't get into that again). A good marriage crisis episode is still good, but yeah, seem like at this point the premise is so overdone all too many attack those on principle.
No.475097
Anonymous
TheRealJims did a video where he counts 76 different episodes involving some variation of the Marge and Homer have a fight plot.
No.475106
Anonymous
>>475082
FWIW Al Jean's "defense" with marriage crisis episodes is that IRL married couples fight all the time so those plots make perfect sense. Which leaves me...very concerned about Jean's views on marriage.
No.475107
Anonymous
>>475106
sure it happens but these episodes specifically Jean's make it sound like every trivial dispute is worth a divorce
No.475112
Anonymous
Replies:>>475119
>>475107
That seems to be the distinction. It's normal for couples to have occasional disputes but being kicked out of the house or contemplating divorce shouldn't happen almost every time as it does here. If you're having too many fights, you have to consider whether the relationship is toxic. It has gone beyond normal marital squabbling at that point.

The part of the video when Jims covered the more petty fights reminded me that I'd be okay with more of that from the show. I'm less okay with episodes that imply Homer and Marge really shouldn't be together because the premise of the show is that they should.
No.475116
Anonymous
Replies:>>475119
Homer Gets a Job or Marriage Crisis episodes. Both grossly overused plots but which do you personally prefer, /co/?
No.475119
Anonymous
>>475116
>>475112
>>475107
>>475106
i hate marriage crisis episodes so much damn why can't they do something else with Homer and Marge's relationship? Homer gets a job plots at least have comedic potential. Maybe a more interesting poll would be marriage crisis vs Bart gets a girlfriend vs Lisa feels insecure and sad.
No.475121
Anonymous
marriage crisis plots are always exactly the same thing

>Homer does something douchebaggy like frame Marge for DUI but be forgiven almost instantly
>Homer and Marge both act like douchebags this has happened so much that Marge is almost as unlikeable as Homer
>Marge acts like a douchebag either Homer didn't do anything or he did some trivial thing that doesn't warrant the overreaction she produces the wacky nature of the act makes her less sympathetic for being angry about it or my personal favorite they don’t want to present Marge as being in the wrong so a Marge centric episode will suddenly turn into a marriage crisis in the third act out of nowhere.
No.475122
Anonymous
>>475038
A pretty good example of Scully's problems (in part because it's easily one of the least cartoonish premises of his latter three seasons) is Insane Clown Poppy. Despite the basic idea being very simple and if anything quite grounded (Krusty dealing with the child of a past relationship), the episode wastes no less than seven minutes on filler up until Sophie actually appears on screen, then another two on the extended Gulf War flashback. The episode is more or less halfway done by the time the actual premise is established and then much of the latter half is left on mafia shenanigans rather than on Sophie's character and how she effects Krusty. We learn pretty much nothing about her beyond that she plays the violin.
No.475124
Anonymous
What if Moe got Ipad
No.475125
Anonymous
>>475122
Actually that raises a very legitimate question--what were the potential reasons for the sudden and dramatic drop in quality from 5F to AA production runs? While there is pretty well-agreed to be a run-off in Scully's first production season, it genuinely feels like the scripting quality utterly self-destructed the moment his second season as showrunner began.
No.475126
Anonymous
Replies:>>475127
>>475122
yeah he should have just stayed a writer. i will say in his defense that he was always really great at writing Bart+Lisa interactions.
No.475127
Anonymous
>>475126
That's probably because Scully had a brother growing up and has kids of his own so he understands how to write those plots. You can tell with some writers like Oakley and Weinstein or Swartzwelder who don't have kids and don't really know how to write child characters.
No.475131
Anonymous
>>475106
i kind of agree that Jean has a very weird and uncomfortable idea of what relationships are like and he really doesn't seem to get Homer and Marge's dynamic at all
No.475132
Anonymous
i mean in the classic seasons Homer and Marge are plenty of times shown to be soul mates and have an active sex life but Jean just always wants to show them as being ready to kill each other--in the Mr. Plow DVD commentary he even asks wtf does Marge find this gross lardass attractive for?
No.475134
Anonymous
Replies:>>475135
Let’s not pretend Jean is the only one who writes shitty marriage episodes and/or Marge as a jerkass. Werking Mom was a Carolyn Omine episode. Just saying.
No.475135
Anonymous
Replies:>>475136
>>475134
this doesn't actually mean much. The credited writer for an episode only actually writes the first draft, not the finished episode. Everything after that is the collective work of the writers' room, directors, and most primarily the showrunner. Marge being the subject of Strong Arms of Ma for example wasn't even Omine's idea - it was supposed to be Homer until Jean wanted the "Marge becomes a bodybuilder" angle. (Which means he can be blamed for the rape joke)
No.475136
Anonymous
Replies:>>475147
>>475135
oh well i guess Omine did the best she could with the mandate Jean imposed on her
No.475143
Anonymous
Image:174484810123.jpg(96kB, 483x679)576557888644.jpg
I'd say Life on the Fast Lane, Two Cars in Every Garage and Three Eyes On Every Fish and a few others like, of course, A Brush With Greatness, did show Marge had more potential. Actually it goes for a lot of female characters that existed during the Season 1-2 period where Groening/Simon/Brooks were showrunners. And of those three, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it's mostly down to James L. Brooks. He's in a way the real creator of Lisa Simpson as she's shown past the Tracy Ulman shorts. Noted in one David Silverman Twitter post that they basically had nothing to work with for her and it was up to Brooks to give her more of a character.
No.475147
Anonymous
>>475136
too bad really because the premise of the episode seemed like a good one but Jean completely fucked it up and it's easy to see which parts were and weren't Omine's
No.475149
Anonymous
>>475143
Brooks was also a co-creator of the Mary Tyler Moore show, credited as groundbreaking for having a lead that was not only a woman but one who wasn't married or dependant on a man at all. And if he also had a hand in some of the side characters at the time, it'd explain a fair bit. They actually had some cool female characters that even if they might've had some connection to a male character, weren't truly defined by them. Except Maude, I suppose. Brooks seemed like a pretty cool fella for the time! But they were always gonna be fighting against Sam Simon enforcing a boys' club in the writers' room in particular. And the effects felt pretty quick once Brooks was no longer a showrunner (probably compounded by one of the new showrunners being our old friend Al Jean).
No.475152
Anonymous
>>475149
thing is Maude wasn't really intended to be a character in the sense that, say, Mrs. Krabapple was, her main purpose was just to show that Ned is happily married and nothing more than that. that also applied to the other wife characters like Luann (pre-A Milhouse Divided), Bernice, Sarah, etc. all of whom exist strictly to show that Homer isn't the only married man in Springfield.

one of the reasons they could kill Maude off was that she was a virtually disposable character and Alone Again Natura-Diddly even kind of makes that point. Yet because of the dramatic effect it had on Ned's character and the substantial amount of attention that was given to the episode in marketing, the character has taken on a retroactive degree of importance that she literally never had, both in the show and outside of it.

which, incidentally, makes Helen the very conspicuous outlier in being an actual character with her own personality separate from her husband. We really were robbed on getting stuff with the Lovejoys, huh?
No.475154
Anonymous
>>475152
but most of the screentime Maude had separate of her husband show her as part of the gang of gossipy ladies who exist only to hassle Marge ala The Twisted World of Marge Simpson
No.475155
Anonymous
Replies:>>475159
>>475152
ok so in the five major Ned episodes of the classic seasons (When Flanders Failed, Dead Putting Society, Homer Loves Flanders, Home Sweet Home Dum Doodly, and Hurricane Neddy) Maude barely does anything and her dialog is merely incidental to the story. because, again, Maude's entire purpose isn't to be a character, it's to accentuate Ned's status as the happy and perfect family man, just as much as Rod and Todd exist to be overly cliche "good Christian boys" who are saccharine to the point of irritating both the audience and Bart (that's a nuance I don't see people bring up often - Bart dislikes the Flanders sons almost as much as his father dislikes Ned).
No.475156
Anonymous
>>475143
>>475149
oh i see he did. fuck that guy then.
No.475157
Anonymous
Maude being changed into more of an openly judgemental and hostile character in the HD episodes do bother me. There were some signs of it in the classic era but they never crossed any lines with it and kept her an alright side character to Ned and who had a bunch of fun moments, even though she was pretty one-dimensional, but as soon as they started essentially demonizing her in a sense (such as in 'Manger Things' pretty much openly hating Homer in spite of him not having done anything to earn it but for merely existing), it started to go too far.

I think they could hsve done a much better job at trying to add more character and development to Maude than essentially making her a posthumous Helen Lovejoy 2.0 by giving her a nasty streak (but then again, seems like most of the Springfield women, ranging from Helen to Luann to Bernice etc. fall into the stereotype of "judgemental women criticizing Marge and her family/kids", which I've noted before).
No.475159
Anonymous
Replies:>>475175
>>475157
>>475155
I wouldn't know for sure how Maude could be best handled but I kind of like the idea of focusing on how she's the one non-genetic Flanders. Sure she wasn't truly intended to be more than "Ned's wife" but tbqh, being stuck on rigid framing or whatever else is death on creativity. I doubt the problems in the Jean era especially would have gotten so bad if they weren't so laser-focused on intent and framing and all that junk. Sure it's interesting to look at it as a means of examining why things turned out like they did but treating intent and stuff as some unbreakable golden rule just leads to characters flattening and acting unnaturally or looking worse than they should or storylines being stale and repetitive. A lot of problems feel like they could be summed up by only looking at what is vs what could be.

Also I agree they never really did know how to write female characters a lot of the time.
No.475175
Anonymous
>>475159
Absolutely agree with that The way a character was conceived and originally introduced doesn't mean they have to stay in that initial box forever. Characters develop and their roles in the series can change and expand as the series itself develops and that's a very good thing! You already mentioned this in a previous post and I know I'm comparing the shorts and the series here (which are quite different things), but Lisa wouldn't be very much of a character if she never evolved past a vague sidekick for Bart's antics.
No.475179
Anonymous
Image:174485117172.gif(1.23MB, 480x360)6577777.gif
On the topic of Maude specifically though I agree there was a little more to her than just being Ned's wife even if we didn't see much too much of it. There are moments like this

which paint her as someone with strong feelings about what the "right" and "wrong" approaches to motherhood and family life are which gives her a way to potentially be in conflict with Marge similar to how their husbands are. There's little things like her usually being seen with Helen that makes me imagine her as the potential number two in that group and stuff like that as well. I do think it makes it more of a shame that she was killed off really because of all the "wife" characters (besides Helen of course who doesn't really fit into that category) she did seem like the one with the most potential to stand on her own two feet with enough development since there were some fleeting signs of an actual character there unlike say Sarah Wiggum.
No.475185
Anonymous
>>475157
yeah...they use Luann a bit more but even so she's never really had any consistent character and varies depending on the needs of the plot.
No.475187
Anonymous
>>475179
they killed her off for entirely spiteful reasons too (her voice actor asked for a raise?)
No.475198
Anonymous
>>475187
At the time Mike Scully claimed they killed off Maude to open new storylines for Ned similar to to Apu getting married and it had nothing to do with Maggie Roswell's pay dispute. But at the same time it's a little hard to believe since while they didn't kill any of her other characters the timing of the episode's production seems to line up perfectly with when she left (in about April 1999 and AAND aired February 2000 and Mike Reiss said each production run of episodes takes about nine months from start to finish.)

Reiss said that when he came back to work on the movie he'd not been involved with the show for quite a number of years and was unaware that they'd killed Maude off in the meantime. He wanted to include a Ned/Maude interaction in the movie script and as he recalled it the writers looked around the room nervously for a few moments before Ian Maxtone-Graham said "Ah ha ha ha sorry but we kind of...killed her off."
No.475213
Anonymous
How Maude died felt almost petty.

>"I'm the one who drove her out of her seat"
>"I'm the one who provoked the lethal barrage of T-shirts"
>"I'm the one who parked in the ambulance zone, preventing any possible resuscitation."
>"But there's no point in playing the blame game."

That's Scully Homer alright.

If they wanted to make new storylines for Ned, maybe killing Maude off might not be the greatest idea to do when there's many other options to choose.
No.475216
Anonymous
>>475187
the issue of Maggie Roswell's salary was between her and Fox, the writers had nothing to do with that. also Roswell has been fairly open about exactly what happened there since the show passed to Disney's ownership and she's no longer beholden to Fox.
No.475226
Anonymous
To this day I haven't found a clue that really points to the staff at the time killing off Maude to take revenge on Roswell or something like that. The payi dispute was related to FOX as far as I know. The 'death plot' was of course an idea that came after Roswell had left the show, but I truly don't think there was any bad blood. I mean, Luann didn't have a single line of dialog between Seasons 10 and 13. As far as we know they just thought it was a good change to Ned for Season 11, like Apu's paternity or Barney's sobriety.
No.475228
Anonymous
>>475179
i find it amusing how in the HD episodes they actually developed Sarah Wiggum into a character and gave her a back story that she used to be a petty criminal who met her husband while in jail.
No.475234
Anonymous
>>475149
it was always a pretty significant fault/limitation of the Simpsons that they were unable to develop most of the female cast very much while many newer shows do not have a problem fleshing out their female characters. though i will say when they tried fleshing out Miss Hoover some it was at least consistent with her character as she'd always been shown unlike Sarah or Brandine where they basically invented personalities for them out of thin air.
No.475262
Anonymous
>>475228
ok but still they made Sarah into something completely different and i don't mean just her voice although i can understand why they did it; the voice Pamela Haydn had always used for her would have gotten really grating to hear over an entire episode.
No.475264
Anonymous
>>475228
That's kind of unfair because even though in Seasons 1-9 the only secondary female characters to be significantly developed were Mrs. Krabapple and Selma, in total only a dozen secondary characters did get any significant development those including Apu, Ned, Burns, Krusty, Skinner, and (arguably) Milhouse. And while I would say Marge is also the most underdeveloped of the main four characters, it's a little false to say they never cared about the female cast at all, even if Mrs. Krabapple and Selma's episodes are largely the same lonely femcel plot.

It also seems that among other bad changes that happened in the Scully era there was an increased emphasis on gag characters like Duffman, Crazy Cat Lady, and Rich Texan. Plus Mrs. K and especially Selma became a lot less relevant after Season 8 (Goo Goo Gai Pan was the first real story Selma got since I think A Fish Called Selma) so the show really had no secondary female characters (unless maybe Shauna but she gives you the ick anyway)
No.475266
Anonymous
>>475157
>but then again, seems like most of the Springfield women, ranging from Helen to Luann to Bernice etc. fall into the stereotype of "judgemental women criticizing Marge and her family/kids", which I've noted before
those kind of women were meant to represent the typical judgemental nagging shrew GI/Silent Generation housewives of the writers' childhoods and it was a trope that was already obsolete by the time the show started.
No.475280
Anonymous
>>475264
>It also seems that among other bad changes that happened in the Scully era there was an increased emphasis on gag characters like Duffman, Crazy Cat Lady, and Rich Texan.

characters like Mrs. Krabapple (jaded public school teacher) and Chief Wiggum (corrupt retard cop) were based on IRL archetypes and they served an important purpose for social satire. Even Comic Book Guy represented an archetypical nerd. But characters like Frink and Disco Stu are just cartoony gag characters that serve no point beyond that. Which was why the female characters sort of became irrelevant because they weren't immediately funny the way the Sea Captain was and especially by the Scully seasons the show had turned to be mostly cheap gags without involved writing.
No.475293
Anonymous
Replies:>>475322
btw if anyone ever wondered about Al Jean and who he's always been let it be known that he absolutely _loves_ Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiali-d'oh-cious. Mike Reiss has said that he pitched the plot for it as early as Season 2, but in 2014 he went so far as to say it was one of the show's top five "essential" episodes next to Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire, Homer at the Bat, Eternal Moonshine of the Simpson Mind, and Once Upon a Time in Springfield. It says a lot about Jean that this episode ends with an entire musical number about how shitty and retarded the Simpsons are and features Shari Bobbins sucked into an airplane engine but even worse of all the hundreds of episodes he could have picked was one that he pitched, personally worked on, is a satire of one of his favorite movies of all time, and was the last episode Mike Reiss had a writing credit on. Note also that OUATIS was written by his wife. It's really quite a revealing glimpse into his mentality.
No.475296
Anonymous
Replies:>>475301
>>475264
Then again, other ones who do have those quirks and act outside of being the love interest (or being flatly "nice") are also the ones people keep calling for to be killed off. Or ignore entirely. it figures that Alex Whitney gets so forgotten that she's not even in tapped out. A quirky, fun, interesting female character with no attachment to any male ones whatsoever and a personality that goes beyond "nice girl" who can actually carry her own jokes too? Never stood a chance. And that sucks ass, legitimately. Whether or not she was intended to be a regular or anything, she deserves so much more credit.
No.475301
Anonymous
Replies:>>475305
>>475296
Um no? Alex isn't brought up as often because Lard of the Dance is well past when the majority of people note the classic series as ending, it has nothing to do with people having some kind of grudge against her being a female character not attached to any male ones. If anything, the fact that Alex is remembered at all is evidence of some fan attachment - the vast majority of post-classic guest characters are forgotten entirely, I'm not really sure where you're getting this assumption from.
No.475305
Anonymous
>>475301
For a start, I didn't say grudge. You're putting words in my mouth to strawman. And that's even if I wasn't using Alex as an example of someone who goes forgotten, which she does. She's not in Tapped Out, she barely ever cameoed even in the comics and most Simpsons fans seem to barely remember her as well. Besides, Sophie exists even further beyond the classic era but not only gets brought up but gets to be part of the show too. Incidentally, as an attachment to a male character.
No.475309
Anonymous
>>475305
you're suggesting Alex was forgotten because of sexism or some other bullshit reason Which doesn't hold up I would say, because by that logic Allison would also be "forgotten", and she most definitely is not. Also remember Alex isn't the only well-remembered guest character absent from Tapped Out - Karl and John are also both missing. It likewise took 7 years for Allison to be added, six for Jacques, literally none of the Allison clones have been added, Mike was only added recently despite Go Big or Go Homer airing in mid-2019, Richard still hasn't been added after more than a decade...there's a lot of oddities in Tapped Out's priorities. The comics were likewise often very cagey about using guest characters connected to the kids most likely so to not risk contradicting the show in some fashion (this is in large why they kept falling back on the twins to fill the "girl" role, in spite of them having as much nuance to their personality as a sack of doorknobs).
No.475313
Anonymous
>>475309
IDK while she isn't as forgotten as Alex, I would say Allison is pretty forgotten about too. Then again, I would say that for majority of the kid characters outside Bart, Lisa, Milhouse, Nelson and maybe Martin, and by extension Sherri and Terri Then again, I'm thinking about the more casual viewers who aren't into the fandom, or those that like the series but just don't care for the kid characters.

I will say that Alex is more memorable than the other Allison clones, ESPECIALLY Tumi & Sam.

When it comes to the sexism accusation, I would want to see proof if anything, but part of me wouldn't be surprised by it somewhat.
No.475317
Anonymous
>>475305
>Besides, Sophie exists even further beyond the classic era but not only gets brought up but gets to be part of the show too. Incidentally, as an attachment to a male character.
Sophie was resurrected because of Al Jean's ego, he had a large part in creating her even though she has never been popular with fans or anything.
No.475319
Anonymous
>>475309
>The comics were likewise often very cagey about using guest characters connected to the kids most likely so to not risk contradicting the show in some fashion (this is in large why they kept falling back on the twins to fill the "girl" role, in spite of them having as much nuance to their personality as a sack of doorknobs).
That is something I noticed as well, its usage of guest characters is surprisingly small, and it's usually background appearances. Even Jessica & Allison, who did appear a bit more than Alex, were mostly relegated to the background, although it didn't help that Allison was often drawn to look like Jessica and vice versa with Jessica looking like Allison.
No.475322
Anonymous
Replies:>>475330
>>475293
i don't think you should fault Jean too much for being biased towards episodes he personally worked on
No.475330
Anonymous
>>475322
I get that and the other showrunners have also upboated episodes they were involved with making but in their case it was the ones they considered their greatest achievements. who the fuck thinks Once Upon a Time in Springfield was any kind of series highlight?
No.475338
Anonymous
>>475309
Ah, the classic sidestep. Funny thing, outside pedo waifufags I rarely see anyone care much about Allison either. Certainly nowhere near to the extent of pretty much any of Bart's girlfriends. And oh yeah, none of the other Lisa friends are in Tapped Out. Yet they added Annika, Gina, Nikki and even Jenda, who all happen to revolve around male characters. Kind of adds to my point.

Also yes I read the comics. They were actually pretty spammy about guest stars. There's even several plots involving Dr. Colossus of all people. Bear Patrol and Bartman were just facts of the comics' continuity also, and several characters had extra relatives. They even gave Sideshow Mel a whole backstory about being a super ace at everything but his parents wanted him to be a sidekick and also an origin story for his hairdo and bone too. So yeah, excuses.

Also it's totally backwards, Jessica would be shoehorned constantly for a token "girl" role, usually because of her looks or how she used to date Bart. Even that "Scooby Don't" comic was blatantly her being cast because her looks alone. Not because of any biased measurement of being a "real character" that's never been an actual factor in anything. Daphne is considered the "pretty girl" of the bunch. That's literally it.
No.475342
Anonymous
>>475338
that's true i wager most non-pedos don't care about Allison and i bet a lot of Simpsons fans find the Homer subplot in Lisa's Rival more memorable than the main plot. ofc there is the fact that a lot of Simpsons fans will care more for the adult characters than the kid characters which does make sense given that most of us are also not pedos.
No.475348
Anonymous
Replies:>>475349
>>475342
Yeah it's a bit unfortunate. Even if probably a rather low key character, it feels like she could have been used in some capacity. Probably more one of those ones for world building but it's still value of a sort, being some sort of "always someone better" figure to Lisa. Or like her own personal Ned Flanders (character who has a better family and out-performs her that she's constantly jealous of)
No.475349
Anonymous
>>475348
i mean Allison wasn't really that interesting or appealing to fans the way Jessica could be so it's not entirely a sexism thing
No.475437
Anonymous
for a character to develop there needs to be _something_ there to work with. Sherri and Terri just weren't that compelling characters and don't really do anything outside bug Bart and Lisa. that would explain why they were rather quickly dropped despite the staff's plans to use them more--this is mentioned in the Season 1 DVD commentaries where they say audiences also found them grating. That Bart and Lisa had no developed relationships amongst their recurring classmates is a structural issue undeniably, but that issue ironically goes to show some of the show's creative strengths in how it was able to develop actually strong characterization with just a single episode.

but i mean Allison does interact with Lisa in a meaningful way that stuff could be developed off of while, say, Janey despite being a recurring character has nothing to work with and serves no real purpose.
No.475453
Anonymous
>>475338
i never got Simpsons fans' love of Jessica Lovejoy. the writers honestly had a lot better judgement in figuring that she didn't have much use beyond the immediate episode she was in.

>Jessica is simply a punk/smart alleck with no positive qualities
>has a non-sequitor excuse for it
>despite being written around the plot still needed another character to act as a crutch
>and has no other obvious character traits ouside of "boys"
>so little personality or independence from men means she has no interactions with Helen or Lisa
>she isn't even written like a 10 year old, more like a sociopathic teen
>and if standards towards Sherri & Terri are applied with any consistency then Jessica is just generic femme fatale, completely boy-centered to the point where she has no interactions with Helen or Lisa let alone a relationship, making anything said about either a matter of extrapolation at best.

if your standards to S&T are applied at all to Jessica then no she wouldn't make a good antagonist of Lisa. No, she's not neglected that's head canon. Even if wanting attention actually added up. She has no relationship with Helen at all and the closest we get is Helen being at least attentive enough to know her daughter's averages. And how exactly is their relationship complicated? Especially at the end? Jessica moved on, already got a new bf. Bart was over her crap, the ending even having him only pretend to fall for her request, vowing to deliberately do a second-rate job and get her in trouble again.

If not for some good Lisa writing (the actual interesting relationship) and some good Homer and Lovejoy gags Bart's Girlfriend would be as bad as any Zombie Simpsons episode. "Bart gets treated like crap by a sociopath." There's zero ambiguity or nuance about the relationship, even Moonshine River got that much.
No.475463
Anonymous
>>475453
and Allison factually isn't Lisa's equal. She's better. That was so obviously her point. Lisa disliked her for it. In the original draft she even fantasizes about snapping Allison's spine (yeah figure a typical Mike Scully gag). Allison took her place as "the best" and Lisa couldn't deal with it. That "me too" obviously was making fun of Allison repeating herself. Also their friendship is extremely thin if, again, we apply standards with any consistency. The only episode where they're truly friends is Lard of the Dance. She tries to be encouraging and Lisa yells at her. That's it. In the "grand narrative" they were friends that barely did anything then I guess Allison got sick of Lisa and decided to hang with the other girls instead (I mean you'd probably get sick of Lisa too). Anything else is headcanon and theoreticals and I'm not entertaining the double standards. It doesn't even seem like a lot of people see her as a significant friend, not anymore. If we deal only in facts, she's had less of a friendship than even Janey, and the latter is supposed to be not particularly strong. Isabel at least got to bond a little with Lisa too because they actually did start as friends.

But even then, considering the show as a whole narrative, most guest stars are meaningless blips, that's why I don't like overrelying on them instead of characters that'll exist after the credits. Extremely few manage to have any real significance like Mona or Herb. Even then it's mostly to someone else. Allison could be argued to have some significance as her episode showed a bad side to Lisa that was an interesting part of her character. The closest to real significance Jessica had was probably inspiring the "children written as teenagers" trend and a bunch of romance episodes.
No.475472
Anonymous
>>475463
>In the original draft she even fantasizes about snapping Allison's spine (yeah figure a typical Mike Scully gag)
yikes. i agree the original draft of LR (which btw was mainly Mike Scully's writing which proves who he was all along) had some pretty godawful moments that seem to predict what was coming in Seasons 10-12 and fortunately at that point there were smarter people in the room to edit out his worst tendencies.
No.475480
Anonymous
>>475472
Scully isn't alone in that tendency, a lot of draft scripts have really excessive or sociopathic gags that were edited out in the finished version. for example in the draft of Homer's Odyssey Sherri & Terri torture Bart a lot more than they do in the actual episode.
No.475488
Anonymous
>>475453
I'd make an argument that Jessica is not flat-out evil with nothing redeeming about her.

She does exhibit a lot of signs of being a sociopath (the lack of empathy and tendency to manipulate), but I still think that her episode does give her some character depth to show that she's a tragic character whom turned out like she did much due to her parent's neglecting her, making her insecure and giving her some obvious mental problems to some degree. She is definitely not a saint and very rotten, but I'd at least her give her some credit for not being some pure evil character but having some depth and nuances. But this is my interpretation of the character and you can have yours, even though I disagree.

That said, I do think you make some good points such as her being written more like a teenager and is pretty much a walking femme fatale trope and lacking in interactions with other characters such as Lisa and her mother (which do show that she was more of a gimmick character that many fans took to being fans), but that doesn't mean that someone else's opinion is not valid or made up. This is definitely not some clear cut black & white issue but a matter of interpretations that should be respected.
No.475617
Anonymous
Replies:>>475619
>>475453
>i never got Simpsons fans' love of Jessica Lovejoy
because pedophiles
No.475618
Anonymous
>>475472
oh yeah i forgot the draft script of Lisa's Rival where the sugar subplot originally ran 3x as long and Homer throws acid in Mrs. Glick's face
No.475619
Anonymous
>>475342
>>475338
>>475617
>pedos pedos pedos!
I'd swear Redwood came back from the dead here.
No.475627
Anonymous
Image:174489592660.jpg(36kB, 640x480)dds.jpg
>The winner will join such other memorable mascots as the Atlanta Whatzit and the Montreal Vampire.
No.475633
Anonymous
>>475463
they've always had a weird inability to write stories involving the kid characters outside the main cast
No.475634
Anonymous
Replies:>>475720
>>475633
even Milhouse, Nelson etc were never really explored in that much depth
No.475636
Anonymous
Replies:>>475649
>>475463
One offs were generally not that big a part of the classic era. What happens when you force them to be the main focus above all else? Everything else gets neglected. It stagnates. Martin for instance slid out of relevance until Russi died (and that pisses me off so much, Russi's talent was wasted) and even while we still had Mrs. K the classroom scenes were fizzling out, because they often needed him too. Milhouse and Nelson became Bart's Lenny and Carl so it was effectively Bart, Mrs. K and nobody else unless there was a guest star.
No.475640
Anonymous
Replies:>>475657
>>475437
>say, Janey despite being a recurring character has nothing to work with and serves no real purpose.
Anything is possible with enough effort. As someone else said Ullman shorts Lisa was a total blank the writers had to build a character from. There are other examples as well. So they could have absolutely made Janey or somebody into a proper character if they really wanted to.
No.475649
Anonymous
>>475636
>>475453
>>475437
if you saw the DVD commentaries they were quite adamant about characters like Jessica being plot devices and they never intended to use them again. i don't get why so many Simpsons fans can't seem to figure that out.
No.475657
Anonymous
>>475640
I understand they were trying to do that with CBG but it didn't really work because Kumiko didn't push or challenge him far enough. I wish they went cartoonier and more stereotypical with her portrayal.
No.475661
Anonymous
Replies:>>475664
One of the worst moves they made was not bothering with Martin or the twins. All of which were introduced really well, actually.
No.475664
Anonymous
>>475661
yeah I agree about Martin but Sherri & Terri are seriously not funny or even endearing and serve no point beyond harrassing Bart and Lisa, the show's staff figured this out early on
No.475675
Anonymous
they could use Allison for something there's some potential there. as for the resurrection of Sophie that was just because the writers needed a girl to round out Bart's e-sports team and fill the Marie role in the When Harry Met Sally homage and and in both instances there happens to be literally only one character who happens to fill the very specific conditions of being a defined girl character Bart/Lisa's age with a relatively available voice actor. Why he decided to recast Sophie specifically is another question but not really relevant here.

again Sherri and Terri don't have any character traits beyond annoying Bart and Lisa so wtf can do you with them?
No.475677
Anonymous
I'm not a fan of how Grey Delise does S&T's voice anyway it's just her Tootie voice and sounds really off coming from them.
No.475679
Anonymous
Replies:>>475681
>>475664
You can't really write twin characters well anyway it just comes off as awkward (yes I know TLH kind of pulls it off) which is why in most cartoons where twins exist they're background or gimmick characters.
No.475681
Anonymous
>>475679
>>475664
if you think Sherri & Terri should have been developed more you probably also think Disco Stu or Duffman should have been made a major character even though that would obviously be horrible. besides it would be like Rerun Van Pelt whom nobody cares about because he was only relevant in the last 12 years of Peanuts when nobody paid attention to it anymore.
No.475683
Anonymous
Replies:>>475684
>>475633
Do one thing and you gotta sacrifice something else. Maybe if they did more plots with the kid characters you'd be complaining they didn't give enough focus to Burns or Flanders or somesuch.
No.475684
Anonymous
>>475683
i think it was always apparently that the Simpsons staff didn't really have much interest in the child characters. it's not like Bob's Burgers where the kids gets lots of stories and screentime, actually to the show's detriment at times.
No.475706
Anonymous
Replies:>>475713
i always thought it would be really cool to have an interlude between the show's "present day" and when "future" episodes usually are set.

Maggie in elementary school--I'm visualizing Billi Bruno's Gracie as the elementary school Maggie.
No.475708
Anonymous
>>475681
I don't think it's strictly impossible to have twin characters both work in tandem and apart from one other. The Loud House as anon said sort of pulled it off by giving Lana and Lola separate identities as characters.

Then again this is all theoreticals--Selma has a child and a pet iguana and Patty is a lesbian and I haven't seen any of those things matter in forever, they're still basically just a unit.
No.475709
Anonymous
>>475681
>besides it would be like Rerun Van Pelt whom nobody cares about because he was only relevant in the last 12 years of Peanuts when nobody paid attention to it anymore.
every time we had a Peanuts thread on /co/ over the years it was mostly just Charlie Brown/Lucy/Peppermint Patty shipping anyway and i never heard Rerun mentioned once because hey who cares about him, right?
No.475711
Anonymous
>>475708
Giving Selma a kid kind of ruined the essential point of her character which was that she was an aging lonely femcel and there was nothing else really to do with her after that.
No.475713
Anonymous
>>475708
>>475706
ok we don't really need to bring up Ling or any plots involving Maggie in grade school because it smacks too hard of MS Paint Chinese baby guy and nobody needs to revisit that bullshit
No.475716
Anonymous
>>438875
Marge's voice actor sounds like a corpse that has been reanimated after 300 years.
No.475717
Anonymous
>be me
>rewatch The Bart Wants What It Wants
>observe that post-Season 8 eps try too hard to make these stories into adult romance plots
if you compare New Kid on the Block and Bart's Girlfriend they're much more innocent and kid-like in how the episodes are constructed--Bart has an innocent crush on an older girl and Jessica is just toying with Bart/making him her simp/fall guy. But TBWWIW? Greta is an absolutely pointless character and in all these eps there's either an overly creepy age gap (Bart/Shauna or Lisa and that cowboy douchebag in Dude Where's My Ranch) or the love interest is just a total nonentity. Even Nikki is just a more psychotic and less subtle Jessica.
No.475720
Anonymous
Replies:>>475757
>>475634
Milhouse really hasn't been developed all that much. His screentime is 90% about his friendship with Bart which isn't explored that much and his having a love interest in Bart's Friend Falls In Love. But he's also too important to the show to just make a totally irrelevant filler character like Janey, so what do you do? Well, Lisa.

And that's funny because in Seasons 1-8 Milhouse didn't really display any romantic interest in Lisa, it was more a Zombie Simpsons development and even then he's mostly shown to be pathetic/creepy/a stalker. So tl;dr his relationship with Bart has very little depth to it and his relationship with Lisa is borderline creepy and makes him come off as a would-be rapist.
No.475757
Anonymous
Replies:>>475772
>>475720
i know Matt Selman has been open about disliking Lisa love stories because he thinks it's stupid and also borderline creepy for a 2nd grader to fall in love
No.475765
Anonymous
Life depends on change and renewal but The Simpsons never really did.

try for example Musicradio 77 WABC (NYC, NYS) in the last 'real' year of its Top 40 format (1978) to WABC as it was in its first full year of that format (1961) -- same format but very different music flow, jingles, promos, adverts it chose to air and what the DJs were allowed to say and how often they could crack open the mic because of course a _lot_ had changed in culture and society over 17 years. Much more than today, the difference between 1961 and '78 was much more vast than the difference between 2025 and 2008. Yes a lot has changed since 2008 but nowhere near as dramatically as it did back in that time.
No.475767
Anonymous
Replies:>>475770
while we're on this subject, can anyone figure out just what the point of making Barney sober was especially since they never really followed up on it?
No.475770
Anonymous
>>475767
I had heard that the writers starting in Season 5 had almost run out of good gags that could be done with Barney to the point of even considering making him the gunman in Who Shot Mr Burns and getting rid of him by having him go to jail and it's significant that Barney gets a lot less screentime in Season 6 onward and by the Scully era they're mostly using Lenny and Carl as Homer's foils.
No.475772
Anonymous
>>475757
Selman really likes Marge episodes for some reason even though it doesn't work because her voice actor is 80% dead by this point.
No.475773
Anonymous
>>475772
Didn't they always say on the DVD commentaries that Marge episodes were really hard to write and nobody liked doing them?
No.475774
Anonymous
>>475773
it's true. Marge is difficult to write for even fanfic writers don't want to bother with her most of the time.
No.475776
Anonymous
Replies:>>475778
>>474919
>He never liked Bart very much so Bart became increasingly irrelevant as time went on
what were you supposed to do with Bart post-Season 9 anyway? Bartmania died with the 90s if not before the decade was over.
No.475778
Anonymous
>>475776
My impression is that they buried Bart because they hate his voice actor.
No.475787
Anonymous
Replies:>>475789
Now if only the writers rememembered Maggie (whom have been conspiciously absent in this current season)
No.475789
Anonymous
>>475787
Maggie really feels like a vestige of the early developmental phase of the show (much like Sherri & Terri) that became irrelevant as soon as they got the main cast's characterizations down pat. In the Ullman shorts and some of Season 1 she's a third wheel between Bart and Lisa but that angle was quickly dropped.
No.475790
Anonymous
Replies:>>475799
>>475772
At least he doesn't seem obsessed with shitting on Bart constantly the way Al Jean did.
No.475792
Anonymous
>>475773
It's more a matter of liking the character or not. When it's a character you really like you have no problem coming up with storylines for them almost effortlessly. I mean you see how Schulz quickly dropped Frieda from the Peanuts cast because he just didn't like her that much and came up with the excuse that there were only 2 or so gags he could do with the character. If he actually liked Frieda he could have easily used her more but he didn't and that was that.
No.475793
Anonymous
Replies:>>475794
Season 27 had a whopping seven Lisa episodes in it which I think is a record in Simpsons history beaten only by Season 9 which had nine Lisa eps, and then Season 28 had none for some odd reason.
No.475794
Anonymous
Replies:>>475795
>>475793
>Season 27 had a whopping seven Lisa episodes in it which I think is a record in Simpsons history beaten only by Season 9 which had nine Lisa eps, and then Season 28 had none for some odd reason.
oh that's easily explained. Yeardley Smith was injured in an accident around that time and was recuperating so they didn't do any Lisa episodes for a season so she could get some rest.
No.475795
Anonymous
Replies:>>475796
>>475794
wow damn i never even heard about that one
No.475796
Anonymous
Replies:>>475797
>>475795
She fell down a staircase and fractured a couple of bones. It was pretty bad actually.
No.475797
Anonymous
>>475796
why couldn't that have happened to Al Jean? or better yet he got accidentally sucked into an airplane engine.
No.475799
Anonymous
Replies:>>475800
>>475790
And it's almost ironic, really, because in the process of people arguing that Lisa is "the favorite" or "the writers' pet," it becomes more and more obvious that Bart is the fandom's pet.
No.475800
Anonymous
>>475799
yeah I agree there's a lot of autists who shit on Lisa but also defend any shitty stuff that Bart does
No.475801
Anonymous
Replies:>>475804
>>475800
This kind of shines another light onto many of these obsessive anti-Lisa, pro-Bart autists whom not only comes off as misogynistic and deluded (to some degree) to idolize and whitewash Bart while Lisa is constantly shit on, but sounds kind of like /pol/ and /r9k/ escaped from their containment boards, speak of "chads" and "stacies" and various other much more troubling things, are active with their meme talk, hate "feeeemales" and feminism &and generally sneer at everything progressive, etc.

So yeah, I can't help by be really concerned about many of these Lisa haters whom think Bart is to idealize, such as this of his string of one-off relationships (and which they seem treat as being one of his admirable aspects, rather than his creativity, for instance).
No.475802
Anonymous
Lisa is a douchebag anyway.
No.475803
Anonymous
>>475800
^This times 100.
No.475804
Anonymous
>>475801
Lisa absolutely cannot really do or represent anything without getting the collective dismay and ire of the hater fandom as, much like I said, the ideals, morals and various personality traits and aspects she represent tend to be those reasons that a lot of folks out there don't take kindly to.
No.475837
Anonymous
the idea of Lisa being a totally friendless aspie always ground my gears a little bit because even an annoying liberal douche like her can find friends, IRL she would just hang out with other liberal douches and they would all sit around complaining about toxic masculinity and whatnot
No.475851
Anonymous
No.475864
Anonymous
Replies:>>475865
>>475837
it never made sense to me why Lisa apparently does have friends and holds a sleepover party in Flaming Moe's
No.475865
Anonymous
>>475864
that doesn't mean much. a lot of times IRL kids will hang out with each other just because they're the only people available and as they get older lose interest in one another.
No.475867
Anonymous
Classic Lisa got Valentines, Ralph was the outcast she felt sorry for and shared a card out of pity. Nu Lisa would probably complain about the over-commercialization of Valentine's and ruin it just like she ruined Love Day.

I'm somewhat joking around here. I still like the character but prefer when she is sensitive and empathetic and not sounding like a jaded college liberal with a ton of student loan debts and whose only relationships are tinged with regret.